Some Properties of Finite Morphisms On Double Poin
Some Properties of Finite Morphisms On Double Poin
Some Properties of Finite Morphisms On Double Poin
net/publication/231964796
CITATIONS READS
3 36
3 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Hassan Haghighi on 11 April 2016.
0. Introduction
1. Preliminaries
+ A = {b ∈ B | ∀x ∈ Spec(A), bx ∈ Ax + R(Bx )}
B
The length of each factor in the above may be interpreted as ”the mul-
tiplicity of a branch of X 0 ”. Therefore we can say that the multiplicity
of X 0 at y is the sum of the multiplicities of the branches of X 0 at y.
From now on, we will only consider the points on X 0 with mul-
tiplicity 2. Since the fi∗ ’s are local homomorphisms, the length of
each factor of the product in (?) is at least one. Thus, either d = 2
and each of the two factors in (?) is isomorphic to k, or, d = 1 and
length(O bX,x /f ∗ (my )O bX 0 ,y ∼
bX,x ) = 2. In the first case, O =ObY,y /ker(fb∗ )∩
1
∗
ker(fb2 ), where, O bY,y /ker(fb ) ∼
∗
= ObX,x for i = 1, 2, thus X 0 has two sim-
i i
ple branches at y. In the latter case, X 0 has an analytically irreducible
double point at y.
0 → OX 0 → f∗ OX → f∗ OX /OX 0 → 0.
LEMMA 2.1. Let P1 and P2 be prime ideals in R and let R/P1 , R/P2
be regular. Then the conductor of R/P1 × R/P2 is reduced in R/P1 ∩ P2
if and only if it is reduced in R/P1 × R/P2 .
Some Properties of Finite Morphisms on Double Points 7
LEMMA 2.3. With the assumption as above, let the singular locus of
X 0 be of local dimension 2r − m at y = f (x1 ) = f (x2 ). Then D is a
complete intersection at y, and ∆ is a complete intersection at x1 and
x2 .
ϕ(u1 ), · · · , ϕ(um ). Since the B-module B/ϕ(mR )B has length two, and
since ϕ is a local homomorphism, we may assume that ϕ(mR )B =
(t1 , · · · , tr−1 , t2r ). Thus by some linear change of variables in R, it can
be assumed that
ϕ(ui ) = ti ; i = 1, · · · , r − 1,
ϕ(ur ) ≡ t2r mod(t1 , · · · , tr−1 , t3r ). (?)
In particular we get i) and the first part of ii0 ). Let A0 = k[[u1 , · · · , ur ]]
and let m0 be the maximal ideal of A0 . We first claim that B is a finite
A0 -module. Observe that
ϕ(ur ) ≡ (1 + h(tr ))t2r mod(ϕ(m0 )B),
where h is a non-unit power series in tr . Thus t2r ∈ ϕ(m0 )B, i.e.,
ϕ(m0 )B is primary for mB . Therefore B is a finite A0 -module (see
[27] Vol. II, page 211). While B/ϕ(m0 )B is now generated by 1̄ and
t̄r , by Nakayama’s lemma (or equivalently, by [4], Theo. 30.6), B is
generated by 1 and tr as an A0 -module. Therefore, t2r = ϕ(g)tr + ϕ(h)
for some non-unit power series g, h ∈ A0 , which gives a relation of
integral dependence of tr over A0 . Now we claim that we may assume
that h = ur . Observe that by (?),
ϕ(ur ) = (1 + a(t1 , · · · , tr−1 ))t2r + b(t1 , · · · , tr−1 )tr
+ c(t1 , · · · , tr−1 ) + d(t1 , · · · , tr )t3r ,
where a, b, c and d are power series and a is non-unit. By the change
of variable ur − c(u1 , · · · , ur−1 ) to ur , we may assume that c = 0. By
changing ur /(1 + a(u1 , · · · , ur−1 )) to ur , it can be assumed that a = 0.
Thus we have
ϕ(ur ) = t2r + b(t1 , · · · , tr−1 )tr + d(t1 , · · · , tr )t3r , (??)
where b is non-unit, because otherwise, tr ∈ ϕ(m0 )B ⊂ ϕ(mR )B, so
that ϕ(mR )B = mB which contradicts Lemma 3.1. Now consider the
relation ϕ(h) = t2r − ϕ(g)tr , which may be written as
h(t1 , · · · , tr−1 , ϕ(ur )) = t2r − g(t1 , · · · , tr−1 , ϕ(ur ))tr .
Substituting from (??), since b is non-unit, the coefficient of t2r on the
right hand side of the above equality is a unit. Since b2 will also be
a non-unit, in order to get a unit coefficient for t2r on the left hand
side of the above equality, the coefficient of ur in the linear part of
h(u1 , · · · , ur ) must be nonzero. Consequently, we may change h to ur
to arrive to
ϕ(ur ) = t2r + ϕ(g0 )tr = t2r + g0 (t1 , · · · , tr−1 , ϕ(ur ))tr .
10 Haghighi, Roberts, and Zaare-Nahandi
as an ideal in A. 2
COROLLARY 3.4. With the notation as in Prop. 3.3 and its proof:
i) C = Γ ⊕ Γtr ,
ii) B/C ∼= A0 /Γ ⊕ (A0 /Γ)tr ,
iii) A/C ∼= A0 /Γ, and
∼
iv) B/A = (A0 /Γ)tr .
In particular, B/A is a free A/C-module of rank 1.
Proof. i) Follows from Prop. 3.3 and the fact B is a free A0 -module
generated by 1, tr .
ii) Follows from this latter fact and i).
iii) This is a direct consequence of Prop. 3.3.
iv) This follows from ii) and iii).
The statement about B/A follows from iii). 2
∼
=
Proof. Let ϕ̄ : T /kerϕ → S be the isomorphism induced by ϕ. Thus
ϕ̄−1 (I) = (f¯1 , · · · , f¯m ), and hence ϕ−1 (I) = (f1 , · · · , fm ) + kerϕ. 2
and
Proof. The first claim follows from Prop. 3.3, Lemmas 3.7 and 3.8.
Since g1 , · · · , gm−r form a regular sequence in k[[u1 , · · · , ur ]], it is clear
that g1 , · · · gm−r , ur+1 , · · · , um will also form a regular sequence in R.
Therefore R/ϕ−1 (C) ∼ = A/C is a complete intersection. 2
LEMMA 3.10. Let t̄r be the class of tr in B/A. Then the conductor as
an ideal in A, is equal to AnnA (t̄r ).
r = 2n + 2 , m = 3n + 2 ,
dimA/C = 2r − m,
3r − 2m + 1 = 2r − m,
depth OX 0 ,y = 2r − m + 1.
0 → A → B → B/A → 0.
depthA B = depth B = r.
A/C ∼
= R/(P1 + P2 ),
and,
B/C ∼
= R/(P1 + P2 ) × R/(P1 + P2 ).
Consequently, the exact sequence of A/C-modules
Proof. This follows by Lemma 2.3, Cor. 3.5 and Cor. 3.9. 2
Some Properties of Finite Morphisms on Double Points 15
4. Weak Normality
In this section we will keep the notations used in the previous sections.
We will assume that char(k) 6= 2. We will check seminormality and
weak normality of the varieties and schemes introduced in the earlier
sections at the double points. In particular, we will prove that when the
conductor, as a subscheme of X, is reduced, then X 0 = f (X) is WN at
double points. This implies the global result that when ∆ is reduced,
X 0 is WN provided that it has no triple point. Assuming that Sing(X 0 )
has the expected dimension, this result is strengthened.
Proof. By assumption O bX 0 ,y ∼
= R/P1 ∩ P2 , where R/P1 and R/P2
are regular. Since OX 0 ,y is SN, OX 0 ,y is SN. To see OX 0 ,y is WN, it is
b
sufficient to show that ObX 0 ,y is WN ([11], II,3). Let A = R/P1 ∩P2 , then
the integral closure of A is B = R/P1 ×R/P2 ([4], Ch. V, Prop. 9). So by
Prop. 1.2, we need to check that for b ∈ B, if pb, bp ∈ A, for some prime
integer p then b ∈ A. Let b = (α, β) ∈ B, then pb = (pα, pβ) = (γ, γ) for
some γ ∈ R. If p 6= chark, since k ⊂ O bX 0 ,y , 1 γ ∈ A which is mapped to
p
b = ( p1 γ, p1 γ). If p = char k , and bp ∈ A, then (αp , β p ) = (δ, δ) for some
δ ∈ R, thus αp − δ ∈ P1 , β p − δ ∈ P2 and hence αp − β p = (α − β)p is in
P1 +P2 . Since A is SN, P1 +P2 is radical in A, therefore α−β ∈ P1 +P2 .
Let α − β = g + h with g ∈ P1 , h ∈ P2 . Thus the class of α − g = β + h
in A maps to (α, β), i.e., b ∈ A. 2
Since (A/C)¯ ⊂ (B/C)¯ (see [20], the proof of Prop. 4.1), by ([6], Prop.
1.5(b)), A/C is SN. 2
The following generalizes ([1], Theo. 2.7), ([10], Prop. 3.5) and ([19],
Prop. 4.4).
THEOREM 4.8. With the notation as above, if ∆ is a reduced scheme,
then X 0 = f (X) is WN.
depth OX 0 ,ξ = depth(B/A)P + 1 = h + 1.
For a local ring (A, m), let Spex(A) = Spec(A) \ {m}. A result of M.
Vitulli together with Theo. 4.9, yield the following necessary and suf-
ficient version of Hartshorne’s depth-connectivity result (see [7], Prop.
2.1).
point.
and,
0 = a1 g1 + a2 ur+1 + · · · + a2(m−r) um .
Since g1 , · · · , gm−r form a regular sequence, and they are polynomials in
u1 , · · · , ur , the sequence g1 , ur+1 , g2 , ur+2 , · · · , gm−r , um is also regular,
i.e., the second column of M form a regular sequence. By a well known
result in commutative algebra, the module of syzygies of a regular
sequence is generated by the so called ”trivial syzygies”. These are,
by definition, syzygies of the form
g = (ur+1 )2 − ur g12 ,
COROLLARY 5.3. With the notation as above, the 1-st Fitting ideal
of B as an R-module is equal to the conductor of B in A (as an ideal
in R, see Remark 3.6).
project. The third author would like to thank IMPA, and the Third
World Academy of Science for their financial support during his visit
of IMPA in July-August 1995. He also likes to thank B. Teissier for
some discussions on weak normality.
References
22. C. Traverso, Seminormality and Picard group, Ann. Sc. Norm. Sup. Pisa 24
(1970) 585-595.
23. M. Vitulli, On grade and formal connectivity of weakly normal varieties, J.
Algebra 81 (1983), 23-28.
24. H. Yanagihara, Some results on weakly normal ring extensions, J. Math. Soc.
Japan, 35, 4 (1983), 649-661.
25. R. Zaare-Nahandi, Seminormality of certain generic projections, Comp. Math.
52 (1984), 245-274.
(q)
26. R. Zaare-Nahandi, Certain structures on the singular loci at S1 -type singu-
larities, Rend., Sem., Mat. Univ. Politec. Torino 49,2 (1991), 299-314.
27. O. Zariski, P. Samuel, Commutative Algebra Vol. I and II, Springer, New York
1975.
28. S. Di Rocco, K. Ranestad, On surfaces in P6 with no trisecant lines, Preprint
of Institut Mittag-Leffler.