Electric 20 Fields 20 in 20 The 20 Human 20 Body 20 Due 20 To 20 Electrostatic 20 Discharges
Electric 20 Fields 20 in 20 The 20 Human 20 Body 20 Due 20 To 20 Electrostatic 20 Discharges
Electric 20 Fields 20 in 20 The 20 Human 20 Body 20 Due 20 To 20 Electrostatic 20 Discharges
net/publication/8399256
CITATIONS READS
32 2,690
3 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Maria Stuchly on 11 May 2015.
Abstract—Electrostatic discharges (ESDs) occur when two responsible for health effects, most notably childhood leukemia
objects at different electric potentials come close enough to arc [3]. Numerical modeling indicates that the electric fields in
(spark) across the gap between them. Such discharges may be human tissue resulting from typical contact currents are much
either single-event or repetitive (e.g., 60 Hz). Some studies have
indicated that ESDs may be a causative factor for health effects in greater than those induced from typical exposures to electric
electric utility workers. Moreover, a hypothesis has recently been and magnetic fields at power line frequencies [4].
forwarded imperceptible contact currents in the human body may An ESD consists of two phases: a relatively slow build-up
be responsible for health effects, most notably childhood leukemia. of charges on objects (resulting in a voltage differential) and a
Numerical modeling indicates that the electric fields in human
rapid transfer of the charges due to the breakdown of air. In the
tissue resulting from typical contact currents are much greater
than those induced from typical exposures to electric and magnetic case of 50 or 60 Hz, the build up of charges of opposite po-
fields at power line frequencies. Numerical modeling is used here larity occurs every half cycle; e.g., 100 or 120 times per second.
to compute representative spark-discharge dosimetry in a realistic In alternating (ac) fields, ESD is described in terms of the cur-
human adult model. The frequency-domain scalar potential finite rent peak value, wave shape (frequency spectrum), and repeti-
difference method is applied in conjunction with the Fourier
transform to assess electric fields in selected regions and tissues of
tion rate [5]. These parameters depend on many factors and can
interest in the body. Electric fields in such tissues as subcutaneous vary widely. However, typical discharges and relevant character-
fat (where peripheral nerves may be excited), muscle and bone istics of the human body have been agreed upon in testing im-
marrow are of the order of kilovolts per meter in the lower arm. munity of electronic equipment. An equivalent circuit consisting
The pulses, however, are of short duration ( 100 ns). of resistances and capacitances leading to ground represents the
Index Terms—Dosimetry, electrostatic spark discharges, human characteristics of the human body. This circuit and the charac-
body, modeling, tissue electric field. teristics of the spark determine the waveform of ESD events.
A specific waveform has been agreed upon in the compatibility
I. INTRODUCTION test standards [6]–[8], and is shown in Fig. 1 for a potential dif-
ference of 2 kV. For other potential differences the current scales
E LECTROSTATIC discharges (ESDs) occur when two
objects at different electric potentials come close enough
to arc (spark) in the gap between the objects. In electric utilities
linearly, while the rise time of the pulse remains approximately
0.7–1 ns. The spectrum of a typical ESD discharge extends up
to about 1 GHz.
or under high-voltage transmission lines, spark discharges
While numerous simulations and measurements have been
occur between an ungrounded person and an isolated con-
performed on ESD interactions with various electronic devices,
ducting object in the electric (or magnetic) field, or vice versa.
Discharges associated with a static field (as in the case of only relatively limited research is available on interactions with
walking on a carpet) are usually nonrepetitive phenomena human tissue. Reilly [9] discusses the characteristics of ESD
(self-extinguishing). On the other hand, for time-varying fields interactions with humans and relevant experimental results.
(50 or 60 Hz), the discharges can be repetitive due to the The most advanced numerical modeling to date involved a
recharging of the bodies (provided that the gap between the human model consisting of 11 interconnected spheres repre-
bodies is maintained sufficiently small). Previous laboratory senting basic anatomical parts (head, upper and lower torso,
studies and analyzes of blood samples from electric power and upper and lower limbs) [10]. A diakoptic method was
employees have suggested that chromosomal anomalies may used to compute capacitances to ground of the body parts,
result from exposure to spark discharges [1], [2]. Recently, a equivalent circuit components of the body parts, and currents
hypothesis has been forwarded that imperceptible currents in at the junctions of the body parts. The analysis showed that
the human body due to contact with charged objects may be high-frequency components of the pulse were short-circuited
by the capacitances between the lower arm and ground.
In this contribution, electric fields resulting from a single typ-
Manuscript received June 17, 2003; revised January 2, 2004. This project was
supported by an EPRI contract and by an NSERC/BC Hydro/Bell Mobility/Al- ical ESD event are computed in the human body. The analysis
taLink industrial research chair. Asterisk indicates corresponding author. is limited to frequencies of the pulse below 40 MHz, as the
T. W. Dawson, deceased, was with the Department of Electrical and Computer spectral power density decreases with frequency, as shown in
Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 3P6, Canada.
*M. A. Stuchly is with the Department of Electrical and Computer En- Fig. 1(b). A heterogeneous, anatomically representative model
gineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 3P6, Canada (e-mail: of the human body is used. Computations are performed with the
mstuchly@ece.uvic.ca). scalar potential finite difference (SPFD) code, which assumes
R. Kavet is with the EPRI—Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA
94304-1344 USA. quasistatic conditions [4]. At frequencies below 1 MHz, the dis-
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TBME.2004.828047 placement currents are less than a small fraction of one percent.
0018-9294/04$20.00 © 2004 IEEE
DAWSON et al.: ELECTRIC FIELDS IN THE HUMAN BODY DUE TO ESDs 1461
and, hence, its spectral content. The most critical factors include
impedances between the human body and the ground (strongly
dependent on the posture), and characteristics of the contact
impedance between the current entry area and the charged ob-
ject. Therefore, the data can be considered as representative but
do not encompass all possible ESD events. The data cannot be
used directly to evaluate biological effects reported in [1], [2].
However, the results presented are useful in comparing elec-
tric fields in tissue due to ESD with those resulting from other
events. Should animal experiments be designed to test chromo-
somal aberrations due to spark discharges, the data presented in
this paper may be of assistance.
II. METHODS
A. Numerical Method and Model
The computations are based on the quasistatic frequency-do-
main SPFD method [4]. In the absence of any magnetic fields,
the electric field at position within the body and at
harmonic frequency may be defined in terms of a scalar po-
tential as
(1)
Fig. 1. Top: typical ESD pulse for 2-kV potential difference (dashed line), its
40-MHz bandwidth content (solid line), and reconstruction of the latter from Under the quasistatic approximation, the internal current density
the 42 point subsampled band-limited spectrum (circles): Middle: Real (solid)
and imaginary (dashed) parts of the spectrum of the full ESD pulse, showing is conserved, so that
part of a slowly decaying tail which extends to over 500 MHz and is associated
with the discharge spike. Bottom: real (solid) and imaginary (dashed) parts of (2)
the spectrum filtered to 40 MHz. The crosses on the real part and circles on the
imaginary part indicate the 42 nonuniformly spaced frequency samples used to Hence, the heart of the SPFD method is the solution of the equa-
represent this spectrum. The inverse DFT of these spectral points give the curve
indicated by the circles in the top panel. tion
(3)
Above 10 MHz, the errors due to neglecting displacement cur-
rents are of the order of a few percent. Thus, only conduction This is subject to the mixed boundary conditions of conservation
currents are computed. While each human tissue is represented of total current
solely by its conductivity, capacitances between the body parts
and ground are incorporated via the waveform of the applied (4)
ESD current pulse. Effects due to contact capacitance and non-
at any surface point(s) with local outward normal through
linear effects of the skin [9] on the total impedance are not di-
which external applied current enters the body, or the
rectly incorporated in the modeling.
condition
Complete dosimetry data are obtained for several tissues of
interest, namely bone marrow, heart, muscle, and fat. For these (5)
tissues, the electric-field magnitude is given in the time domain.
The waveforms are illustrated and the summary data, such as at any grounded surface points. Thus, for each fixed frequency,
the averages in various body parts and tissues, and the 99th per- the problem is essentially one of harmonic contact currents [4].
centile electric fields (i.e., the values not exceeded in 99% of the The SPFD method assigns potentials at the nodes, and elec-
volume of the tissue), are given. The results for ESD are com- tric-field vectors at the edge centers. The second-order partial
pared to the fields in tissue reported for contact currents [4]. differential equation (3) governing the scalar potential leads to
The selection of tissues of interest is based on the possible in- a seven-point computational star and consequently a heptadiag-
teraction mechanisms, namely the hypothesized leukemia link onal matrix representing the underlying mixed boundary-value
to strong electric fields in bone marrow [3], and the established problem. Solution is efficiently obtained using the conjugate
interaction with excitable tissue, namely heart, muscle and fat gradient method, as explained in [4].
(where peripheral nerves are located). The brain is not explic- The human body model used in the present modeling is the
itly considered, as the associated electric fields due to ESD in- same as in [4], and is illustrated therein (see also Fig. 5). It con-
volving limb-to-limb paths are very low. sists of approximately cubic voxels. Each voxel is ho-
The data presented have several limitations. The waveforms mogeneous (of constant conductivity), with 3.6-mm edges. Ap-
and numerical results are limited to a single representative pulse, proximately 80 tissues and organs are segmented in the whole
as defined and shown in Fig. 1. As discussed by numerous au- body. The body is grounded via the soles of both feet. At each
thors ([5]–[9]), various factors can change the shape of the pulse frequency, the ESD event is modeled as a contact current en-
1462 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, VOL. 51, NO. 8, AUGUST 2004
(6)
TABLE I
TISSUE CONDUCTIVITIES (S/m) AT REPRESENTATIVE FREQUENCIES
Fig. 4. Average (solid) and 99th percentile (dashed) electric fields in fat in the
distal limbs: (a) right arm; (b) left arm; (c) right leg; and (d) left leg. Note that
the side lobes in (b) are a result of numerical round-off error in the solution, as Fig. 5. Cross-sectional average electric-field amplitudes in the right arm and
the fields in the lower left arm are negligible. both legs as a function of height above the soles of the feet. The data are for
tissue conductivities at a single frequency, namely 10 kHz.
TABLE II
GLOBAL MEASURES OF PULSES OVER ALL VOXELS OF THE INDICATED TISSUES AND REGIONS. THE ESD PULSE IS NORMALIZED TO 1 A PEAK IN TIME
TABLE III
MEASURES OF ELECTRIC FIELD PULSES TAKEN AT 71% OF THE MAXIMUM VALUE, FOR A 1-A PEAK ESD PULSE
TABLE IV
MEASURES OF CURRENT DENSITY PULSES TAKEN AT 71% OF THE MAXIMUM VALUE, FOR A 1 A PEAK ESD PULSE
temporal peak. The next pair of columns gives the average Two general observations apply to these dosimetric measures
and maximum field values at for the electric fields and current density in tissue resulting from
these levels. The final pair of columns gives the area under ESD. First, very high field and current density occur in some
the pulses at the 71%-of-maximum level for the average field locations where excitable cells are located, namely in subcuta-
and maximum field . Table IV neous fat where peripheral nerves are located, and in muscle.
presents the analogous data for the current density pulses. All Also, bone marrow fields and current densities are high. Second,
values correspond to a 1-A peak ESD pulse. It can be noted that the duration over which the tissue experiences these strong
the time-integrals of the current density pulses have the units of fields is short ( ns) compared to the duration of typical
a surface charge density, i.e., nC/m . The pulse duration at the cell time constants (e.g., 0.1–3 ms for excitable cells [9]).
71%-of-peak level is about to 45 to 50 ns for the electric fields,
and slightly shorter for the current density. C. Comparison With Contact Current Dosimetry
Table V contains similar data to those in Table IV, but taken A previous numerical investigation into the effects of 60-Hz
at 50% of the per-voxel peak. This table reports the average and contact currents considered adult and child human models,
maximum electric-field pulse widths and values in columns 3–6. with a particular emphasis on bone marrow electric fields [4].
The final two columns report the time-integral of the current One scenario involved contact current flowing from the left
density pulse. The pulse duration at the 50%-of-maximum level hand to ground through both feet. This scenario is similar
is about 65–75 ns. to the ESD model, (except for the surface area and arm of
DAWSON et al.: ELECTRIC FIELDS IN THE HUMAN BODY DUE TO ESDs 1467
TABLE V
MEASURES OF ELECTRIC FIELD AND CURRENT DENSITY PULSES TAKEN AT 50% OF THE MAXIMUM VALUE FOR A 1-A PEAK ESD PULSE
TABLE VI to those due to contact currents, when the ESD values are
ELECTRIC FIELDS IN BONE MARROW PRODUCED BY 60-Hz CONTACT normalized (reduced) according to their short duration.
CURRENTS AND ESD. THE FIELDS, DUE TO CONTACT CURRENT, ARE 99TH
PERCENTILE VALUES FOR 0.1 mA. THE ESD VALUES ARE THE AVERAGE AND
99TH PERCENTILE PER PULSE AT 71% PEAK IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4, WHILE
COLUMNS 5 AND 6 CONTAIN THE AVERAGES OF THE ESD PULSES OVER IV. CONCLUSION
A 120-Hz (BIPOLAR) REPETITION RATE. THE ESD VALUES CORRESPOND
TO THE 4-A PEAK LEVEL SHOWN IN Fig. 1(d) Typical ESD through a human body has peak currents of the
order of a few to several tens of amperes and a relatively short
duration of the order of 100 ns. Most of the ESD pulse energy is
contained at frequencies below 40 MHz. At these low frequen-
cies, quasistatic approximation can be used to evaluate the elec-
tric fields in human tissue. Numerical evaluation of the electric
field and current density from ESD has been performed for a het-
erogeneous model of the human body. The computations have
used the FT to obtain the spectrum of the ESD part, which is
the band-limited to 40 MHz. Thus, the frequency-domain SPFD
code and inverse FT permitted computation of the fields in var-
ious tissues.
Waveforms computed in selected tissues indicate that ESD
contact). Table VI gives a comparison of electric fields in produces the highest fields in the lower part of the arm when
bone marrow between ESD and contact currents. The second ESD occurs via a small area of the hand. The computations in-
column contains the temporal rms 99th percentile fields in dicate electric fields of about 25-kV/m and 100-ns duration in
the contact arm and the right leg bone marrow. The con- subcutaneous fat, where peripheral nerves may be stimulated.
tact current level is set at 0.1 mA for easy normalization to Also relatively high fields occur in muscle and bone marrow.
other levels. The resulting electric fields range from about Electric fields in the heart and spinal cord are lower (of the order
30–460 mV/m. The table also contains the ESD time-averaged of hundreds of volts per meter), and in the brain are very low.
electric fields over the 71%-of-maximum levels. Specifically, Electric fields in human tissue from ESD are much higher
the values given are (column 3) and than those associated with other environmental or occupational
(column 4) from Table III. The final exposures, such as contact currents, or electric and magnetic
two columns give the time average values for a 120-Hz bipolar fields at power line frequencies (50 or 60 Hz). However, the ESD
repetition rate. All data in this table correspond to the 4-A level fields are of very short duration. In the case of repetitive ESD
of the low-frequency ESD pulse model in Fig. 1. events, which may occur in power-line environments(mostly in
Contact currents vary considerably in residential settings. occupational settings), time-averaged fields are comparable to
Typical imperceptible currents are of the order of tens of those resulting from contact currents.
microamperes [4]. However, up to between 0.5 and 5 mA are Biological significance of the computed tissue electric fields
the limits recommended in safety standards [4], [18]. Contact needs to be evaluated. Interactions such as stimulation of ex-
currents up to about 1 mA may occur also under high voltage citable tissue are an obvious phenomenon that may be expected.
transmission lines (in 10 kV/m) [4]. Thus, the electric fields in Possible effects on cells can be evaluated by applying the elec-
bone marrow produced by 60-Hz ESD currents are comparable tric-field waveforms in a tissue into its cells.
1468 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, VOL. 51, NO. 8, AUGUST 2004
APPENDIX REFERENCES
THE FILON–TRAPEZOIDAL RULE [1] I. K. Nordenson, K. H. Mild, S. Nordstrom, A. Swein, and E. Birke,
“Clastrogenic effects in human lymphocytes of power frequency electric
In the Filon–Trapezoidal Rule [11], the data is prescribed at fields: In vivo and in vitro studies,” Radiat. Environ. Biophysics, vol. 23,
time samples with associated data sam- pp. 191–2001, 1984.
ples and the interval is chosen to contain [2] I. Nordenson, K. H. Mild, U. Ostman, and H. Ljungberg, “Chromosomal
effects in lymphocytes of 400 kV-substation workers,” Radiat. Environ.
the support of . One interpolates the function linearly Biophys., vol. 27, pp. 39–47, 1988.
on each th subinterval of length , [3] R. Kavet and L. E. Zaffanella, “Contact voltage measured in residences:
and obtains the FT approximation Implications to the association between magnetic fields and childhood
leukemia,” Bioelectromagnetics, vol. 23, pp. 464–74, 2002.
[4] T. W. Dawson, K. Caputa, M. A. Stuchly, and R. Kavet, “Electric fields
in the human body resulting from 60-Hz contact currents,” IEEE Trans.
Biomed Eng., vol. 48, pp. 1020–1026, Sept. 2001.
[5] D. W. Deno and L. E. Zaffanella, “Field effects of overhead transmission
lines and stations—Currents induced by spark discharges,” in Transmis-
(13) sion Line Reference Book, 345 kV and Above, 2nd ed. Palo Alto, CA:
Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), 1982, ch. 8, pp. 372–373.
The integrands can be integrated analytically, thereby reducing [6] W. Rhoades and J. Maas, “New ANSI ESD standard overcoming the de-
ficiencies of the worldwide ESD standards,” in Proc. 1998 IEEE Electro-
problems with integrating rapidly oscillating exponentials at magnetic Compatibility Symp., Denver, CO, Aug. 1998, pp. 1078–1082.
high frequencies. The resulting approximation is [7] Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC), Part 4, Testing and Measurement
Techniques—Section 2: Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test, IEC, Std.
61 000-4-2, 1995.
[8] M. Angeli and E. Cardelli, “Numerical modeling of electromagnetic
fields generated by electrostatic discharges,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol.
33, pp. 2199–2202, Mar. 1997.
(14) [9] J. P. Reilly, Electrical Stimulation and Electropathology. New York:
Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992.
[10] V. Amoruso, M. Helali, and F. Lattarulo, “An improved model of man
where the star denotes complex conjugation, and the auxiliary for ESD applications,” J. Electrostat., vol. 49, pp. 225–244, 2000.
[11] C. J. Tranter, Integral Transforms in Mathematical Physics. London,
function is U.K.: Chapman and Hall, 1974.
[12] A. V. Oppenheim and R. Schafer, Digital Signal Processing.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1975.
[13] S. Gabriel, R. W. Lau, and C. Gabriel, “The dielectric properties of bi-
ological tissues—II: Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20
GHz,” Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 41, pp. 2251–2269, 1996.
[14] , “The dielectric properties of biological tissues—III: Parametric
(15) models of the dielectric spectrum of tissues,” Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 41,
pp. 2271–2293, 1996.
The indicated bracketing for the general form of [15] T. W. Dawson and M. A. Stuchly, “High resolution organ dosimetry for
human exposure to low frequency magnetic fields,” IEEE Trans. Magn.,
gives the best numerical accuracy. These results permit vol. 34, pp. 708–718, May 1998.
evaluation of at any desired frequency. Note that the [16] V. Raicu, N. Kitagawa, and A. Irimajiri, “A quantitative approach to the
transform approximation directly gives the required property dielectric properties of the skin,” Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 45, no. 2, pp.
L1–L4.
for the spectrum of a real function . The [17] T. W. Dawson, M. Potter, and M. A. Stuchly, “Evaluation of modeling
inverse FT on a nonuniformly spaced set of frequency samples accuracy of power frequency field interactions with the human body,”
is immediately seen to have the ACES J., vol. 16, pp. 162–172, 2001.
[18] International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (IC-
approximation NIRP), “Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, mag-
netic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz),” Health Phys., vol.
74, pp. 494–522, 1998.
(16)
T. W. Dawson (M’95–SM’98), deceased, photograph and biography not avail-
able at the time of publication.
where .
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
M. A. Stuchly (M’71–SM’76–F’91), photograph and biography not available
This paper is dedicated to the Memory of Dr. Trevor Dawson, at the time of publication.
who passed away suddenly in December 2003. The authors
thank Dr. K. Caputa, from the University of Victoria, and
Dr. M. Okoniewski, from University of Calgary, for helpful
discussions related to signal processing. R. Kavet, photograph and biography not available at the time of publication.