Language 2023
Language 2023
Language 2023
GRADES 1–8
Language
2023
This file is an extract and may not reflect or represent the full Ontario Curriculum.
Printed on 2023-09-03
The Ontario Public Service endeavours to demonstrate leadership with respect to accessibility in Ontario.
Our goal is to ensure that Ontario government services, products, and facilities are accessible to all our
employees and to all members of the public we serve. This document, or the information that it contains,
is available, on request, in alternative formats. Please forward all requests for alternative formats to
ServiceOntario at 1-800-668-9938 (TTY: 1-800-268-7095).
Une publication équivalente est disponible en français sous le titre suivant : Le curriculum de l’Ontario
de la 1re à la 8e année – Français (2023)
A variety of overarching perspectives, themes, and skills are intentionally incorporated by educators, on
an ongoing basis, into teaching and learning across all subjects and disciplines of the curriculum – they
are part of “cross-curricular learning”. Educators plan programs to include learning in these areas, which
are relevant in the context of most curriculum subjects, and are critical to students in navigating their
world. They range from environmental education, Indigenous education, and financial literacy to social-
emotional learning, critical literacy, mathematical literacy, and STEM education. These various themes,
perspectives, and skills are explored in this section.
Another approach to teaching and learning “across subjects” is called “integrated learning”. This
approach differs from cross-curricular learning because it involves combining curriculum expectations
from more than one subject in a single lesson, and evaluating student achievement of the expectations
within the respective subjects from which they are drawn.
“Scope and sequence” resource guides are compilations of existing curriculum expectations, from all
subjects and disciplines, that relate to specific ministry priorities and initiatives. For example, scope and
sequence resource guides have been developed for environmental education (elementary and
secondary); financial literacy (elementary and secondary); First Nations, Métis, and Inuit connections
(elementary and secondary); and health and safety (elementary and secondary).
These documents identify expectations that involve learning about the particular topic, as well as
teacher supports that touch on the topic or that describe opportunities for addressing it. The teacher
supports include the examples, sample questions, teacher prompts, student responses, and/or
instructional tips that accompany the expectations and describe optional ways in which teachers can
elicit the learning described in the expectation. Teachers can glean ideas from the teacher supports,
based on their professional judgement and taking into account the interests of the students and the
local communities represented in their classrooms, for incorporating learning about these topics across
subjects. The scope and sequence resource guides can also support divisional/school planning on
particular topics or issues across classrooms and grades.
Integrated learning engages students in a rich learning experience that helps them make connections
across subjects and brings the learning to life. Integrated learning provides students with opportunities
to work towards meeting expectations from two or more subjects within a single unit, lesson, or activity.
It can be a solution to the problems of fragmented learning and isolated skill instruction, because it
provides opportunities for students to learn and apply skills in meaningful contexts across subject
boundaries. In such contexts, students have opportunities to develop their ability to think and reason
and to transfer knowledge and skills from one subject area to another. Although the learning is
integrated, the specific knowledge and skills from the curriculum for each subject are taught.
Elementary Curriculum
By linking expectations from different subjects within a single unit, lesson, or activity, elementary
teachers can provide students with multiple opportunities to reinforce and demonstrate their
knowledge and skills in a variety of contexts. Teachers then evaluate student achievement in terms of
the individual expectations, towards assigning a grade for each of the subjects involved.
One example would be a unit linking expectations from the science and technology curriculum and from
the social studies curriculum. Connections can be made between these curricula in a number of areas –
for example, the use of natural resources, considered from a scientific and an economic perspective;
variations in habitat and ecosystems across the regions of Canada, exploring both the biology and the
geography of those regions; historical changes in technology; and the impact of science and technology
on various peoples and on the environment. In addition, a unit combining science and technology and
social studies expectations could teach inquiry/research skills common to the two subjects, while also
introducing approaches unique to each.
Secondary Curriculum
Ontario’s secondary curriculum is designed to provide opportunities for educators to integrate student
learning across disciplines and subjects. Some secondary expectations are written to implicitly connect
with and support content learning and skill development outlined in other curricula. For example, the
secondary math and science curricula are aligned so that students can apply what they learn in math to
what they are learning in the sciences. For instance, in Grade 11 and 12 math courses, students learn
the mathematical concepts needed to support learning in chemistry and physics courses in those grades.
As another example, expectations in social sciences and humanities are aligned with some of the
expectations in the English curriculum.
The education system has a vital role to play in preparing young people to take their place as informed,
engaged, and knowledgeable citizens in the global economy. Financial literacy education can provide the
preparation Ontario students need to make informed decisions and choices in a complex and fast-
changing financial world.
Because making informed decisions about economic and financial matters has become an increasingly
complex undertaking in the modern world, students need to build knowledge and skills in a wide variety
of areas. In addition to learning about the specifics of saving, spending, borrowing, and investing,
students need to develop broader skills in problem solving, research and inquiry, decision making,
critical thinking, and critical literacy related to financial issues, so that they can analyse and manage the
risks that accompany various financial choices. They also need to develop an understanding of world
economic forces and the effects of those forces at the local, national, and global level. In order to make
wise choices, they will need to understand how such forces affect their own and their families’ economic
and financial circumstances. Finally, to become responsible citizens in the global economy, they will
need to understand the social, environmental, and ethical implications of their own choices as
consumers. For all of these reasons, financial literacy is an essential component of the education of
Ontario students in a twenty-first century context – one that can help ensure that Ontarians will
continue to prosper in the future.
Resource documents – The Ontario Curriculum, Grades 4–8: Financial Literacy Scope and Sequence of
Expectations, 2016 and The Ontario Curriculum, Grades 9–12: Financial Literacy Scope and Sequence of
Expectations, 2016 – have been prepared to assist teachers in bringing financial literacy into the
classroom. These documents identify the curriculum expectations and related examples and prompts, in
disciplines across the Ontario curriculum, through which students can acquire skills and knowledge
related to financial literacy.
STEM Education
View in ASL
K–12 STEM education is the study of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, including
cross-curricular and/or integrative study, and the application of those subjects in real-world contexts. As
students engage in STEM education, they develop transferable skills that they need to meet the
demands of today’s global economy and society.
STEM education helps students develop an understanding and appreciation of each of the core subjects
of mathematics, science, and technological education. At the same time, it supports a more holistic
understanding and application of skills and knowledge related to engineering design and innovation.
Engineering design and innovation engages students in applying the principles of science, technology,
and mathematics to develop economical and sustainable solutions to technical and complex societal
problems to meet human needs.
Among the transferable skills developed through STEM education are computational thinking, coding,
design thinking, innovating, use of the scientific method, scientific inquiry skills, and engineering design
skills. These skills are in high demand in today’s globally connected world, with its unprecedented
advancements in technology.
Approaches to STEM education may vary across Ontario schools. STEM subjects may be taught
separately, but with an effort to make cross-curricular connections a part of student learning. Problem-
solving application projects may be designed to combine two or more STEM subjects. Alternatively,
content from all four STEM subjects might be fully integrated to reinforce students' understanding of
each subject, by enhancing their understanding of the interrelationships among them, and by providing
the opportunity to apply a spectrum of knowledge and skills in novel ways in real-world contexts. As
STEM education is implemented, it is important to engage diverse perspectives and ways of thinking.
including those inherent in the arts and humanities. Diverse perspectives engage students in a variety of
creative and critical thinking processes that are essential for developing innovative and effective
solutions that impact communities or ecosystems.
A robust K–12 STEM education enables Ontario educators and students to become innovators and
leaders of change in society and the workforce, and creates opportunities in our diverse communities to
foster integrative thinking and problem solving.
Indigenous Education
View in ASL
To move forward on their learning journey, students must have a solid understanding of where we have
been as a province and as a country. Consistent with Ontario’s vision for Indigenous education, all
students will have knowledge of the rich diversity of First Nations, Métis, and Inuit histories, cultures,
perspectives, and contributions, as well as an awareness of the importance of Indigenous ways of
knowing in a contemporary context. Ontario is committed to ensuring that First Nations, Métis, and Inuit
survivors and communities bring their perspectives to students’ learning about our shared history.
It is essential that learning activities and resources used to support Indigenous education are authentic
and accurate and do not perpetuate culturally and historically inaccurate ideas and understandings. It is
important for educators and schools to select resources that represent the uniqueness of First Nations,
Métis, and Inuit histories, perspectives, and world views authentically and respectfully. It is also
important to select resources that reflect local Indigenous communities as well as First Nations, Métis,
and Inuit individuals and communities from across Ontario and Canada. Resources that best support
Cultural Safety
It is important to create a learning environment that is respectful and that makes students feel safe and
comfortable not only physically, socially, and emotionally but also in terms of their cultural heritage. A
culturally safe learning environment is one in which students feel comfortable about expressing their
ideas, opinions, and needs and about responding authentically to topics that may be culturally sensitive.
Educators should be aware that some students may experience emotional reactions when learning
about issues that have affected their own lives, their family, and/or their community, such as the legacy
of the residential school system. Before addressing such topics in the classroom, teachers need to
consider how to prepare and debrief students, and they need to ensure that appropriate resources are
available to support students both inside and outside the classroom.
Literacy
View in ASL
❝
Literacy is the ability to use language and images in rich and varied forms to
read, write, listen, speak, view, represent, discuss, and think critically about
ideas. Literacy enables us to share information and to interact with others.
Literacy is an essential tool for personal growth and active participation in a
democratic society.
Literacy skills are embedded in the expectations for all subjects and disciplines of the Ontario
curriculum. Each subject provides opportunities for literacy development, often in specialized ways.
Literacy needs to be explicitly taught in all subjects. Literacy demands, such as vocabulary acquisition
and accessing and managing information, become more complex across subjects and disciplines as
students progress through the grades.
In Ontario schools, all students are equipped with the literacy skills necessary to be critical and creative
thinkers, effective meaning-makers and communicators, collaborative co-learners, and innovative
problem-solvers. These are the skills that will enable them to achieve personal, career, and societal
goals. Students develop literacy skills as they think, express, and reflect.
In every subject, before, during, and after they read, view, listen, speak, or write, students select and
use a variety of literacy strategies and subject-specific processes. This helps them comprehend and
organize information and ideas, and communicate meaning. Teachers assist students in learning and
selecting appropriate literacy strategies based on assessment of their individual needs and learning
preferences.
Students learn to think, express, and reflect in discipline-specific ways. Teachers purposefully teach
students about the literacy demands of the particular subject area. Students learn the vocabulary and
terminology that are unique to a particular subject area and must be able to interpret symbols, charts
and diagrams. Cross-curricular and subject-specific literacy skills are essential to students’ success in all
subjects of the curriculum, and in all areas of their lives.
Critical thinking is the process of thinking about ideas or situations in order to understand them fully,
identify their implications, make a judgement, and/or guide decision making. It is an essential
1This page has been adapted from Adolescent Literacy Learning, Adolescent Literacy Guide: A
Professional Learning Resource for Literacy, Grades 7–12. Revised 2016, pages 4–19, and the 2016
Student Achievement Literacy Planning Resource: Grades 7–12, page 7.
Students use critical-thinking skills when they assess, analyse, and/or evaluate the impact of something
and when they form an opinion and support that opinion with a rationale. In order to think critically,
students need to ask themselves effective questions in order to interpret information; detect bias in
their sources; determine why a source might express a particular bias; examine the opinions, perspec-
tives, and values of various groups and individuals; look for implied meaning; and use the information
gathered to form a personal opinion or stance, or a personal plan of action with regard to making a
difference.
Students approach critical thinking in various ways. Some students find it helpful to discuss their
thinking, asking questions and exploring ideas. Other students may take time to observe a situation or
consider a text carefully before commenting; they may prefer not to ask questions or express their
thoughts orally while they are thinking.
Critical literacy is the term used to refer to a particular aspect of critical thinking. Critical literacy
involves looking beyond the literal meaning of a text to determine what is present and what is missing,
in order to analyse and evaluate the text’s complete meaning and the author’s intent. Critical literacy is
concerned with issues related to fairness, equity, and social justice. Critically literate students adopt a
critical stance, asking what view of the world the text advances and whether they find this view
acceptable, who benefits from the text, and how the reader is influenced.
Critically literate students understand that meaning is not found in texts in isolation. People make sense
of a text, or determine what a text means, in a variety of ways. Students therefore need to take into
account: points of view (e.g., those of people from various cultures); context (e.g., the beliefs and
practices of the time and place in which a text was created and those in which it is being read or
viewed); the background of the person who is interacting with the text (e.g., upbringing, friends,
communities, education, experiences); intertextuality (e.g., information that a reader or viewer brings to
a text from other texts experienced previously); gaps in the text (e.g., information that is left out and
that the reader or viewer must fill in); and silences in the text (e.g., the absence of the voices of certain
people or groups).
Students who are critically literate are able, for example, to actively analyse media messages and
determine possible motives and underlying messages. They are able to determine what biases might be
contained in texts, media, and resource material and why that might be, how the content of these
materials might be determined and by whom, and whose perspectives might have been left out and
why. Only then are students equipped to produce their own interpretation of an issue. Opportunities
should be provided for students to engage in a critical discussion of “texts”, including books and
textbooks, television programs, movies, documentaries, web pages, advertising, music, gestures, oral
The literacy skill of metacognition supports students’ ability to think critically through reflection on their
own thought processes. Acquiring and using metacognitive skills has emerged as a powerful approach
for promoting a focus on thinking skills in literacy and across all disciplines, and for empowering
students with the skills needed to monitor their own learning. As they reflect on their strengths and
needs, students are encouraged to advocate for themselves to get the support they need in order to
achieve their goals.
Mathematical Literacy
View in ASL
❝
Mathematical literacy is an individual’s capacity to formulate, employ, and
interpret mathematics in a variety of contexts. It includes reasoning
mathematically and using mathematical concepts, procedures, facts, and tools
to describe, explain, and predict phenomena. It assists individuals to recognize
the role that mathematics plays in the world and to make the well-founded
judgments and decisions needed by constructive, engaged, and reflective
citizens.
Mathematical literacy involves more than executing procedures. It implies a knowledge base and the
competence and confidence to apply this knowledge in the practical world. A mathematically literate
person can estimate; interpret data; solve day-to-day problems; reason in numerical, graphical, and
geometric situations; and communicate using mathematics.
As knowledge expands and the economy evolves, more people are working with technologies or
working in settings where mathematics is a cornerstone. Problem solving, the processing of information,
2Adapted from Leading Math Success: Mathematical Literacy, Grades 7–12 – The Report of the Expert
Panel on Student Success in Ontario, 2004, pages 10 and 24.
Mathematical literacy has several dimensions – for example, numerical literacy, spatial literacy, and data
literacy – and extends beyond the mathematics classroom to other fields of study.
Teachers should take advantage of the abundant opportunities that exist for fostering mathematical
literacy across the curriculum. All teachers have a responsibility to communicate the view that all
students can and should do mathematics.
Environmental Education
View in ASL
Environmental education is both the responsibility of the entire education community and a rich
opportunity for cross-curricular learning. It can be taught across subjects and grades, providing context
that can enrich and enliven learning in all subject areas. It also provides opportunities for critical
thinking, learning about citizenship, and developing personal responsibility. It offers students the
opportunity to develop a deeper understanding of themselves, their role in society, and their
dependence on one another and on the Earth’s natural systems.
The curriculum provides opportunities for students to learn about environmental processes, issues, and
solutions, and to demonstrate their learning as they practise and promote environmental stewardship at
school and in their communities.
Acting Today, Shaping Tomorrow: A Policy Framework for Environmental Education in Ontario Schools
outlines an approach to environmental education that recognizes the need for all Ontario students to
Resource documents – The Ontario Curriculum, Grades 1–8 and The Kindergarten Program:
Environmental Education, Scope and Sequence of Expectations, 2017 and The Ontario Curriculum,
Grades 9–12: Environmental Education, Scope and Sequence of Expectations, 2017 – have been
prepared to assist teachers in planning lessons that integrate environmental education with other
subject areas. They identify curriculum expectations and related examples and prompts in disciplines
across the Ontario curriculum that provide opportunities for student learning “in, about, and/or for” the
environment. Teachers can use these documents to plan lessons that relate explicitly to the
environment, or they can draw on them for opportunities to use the environment as the context for
learning. These documents can also be used to make curriculum connections to school-wide
environmental initiatives.
The development of social-emotional learning (SEL) skills helps students foster overall health and well-
being, positive mental health, and the ability to learn, build resilience, and thrive.
Social-emotional learning skills are an explicit component of learning in the elementary health and
physical education curriculum. However, there are opportunities for students to develop SEL skills in
connection with their learning in all subjects and disciplines. Skills to support mental health and well-
It is beneficial for students to make connections between SEL skills, transferable skills, and learning skills
and work habits (see Growing Success, 2010, Chapter 2). Taken together, these interrelated skills
support students’ overall health and well-being, positive mental health, and the ability to learn and to
become lifelong learners. They enhance students’ experience in school and beyond, preparing them to
succeed personally and to become economically productive and actively engaged citizens. School
Mental Health Ontario (SMHO) has resources to support the development of social-emotional learning
in Ontario schools.
Growing Success: Assessment, Evaluation, and Reporting in Ontario Schools, First Edition, Covering
Grades 1 to 12, 2010 sets out the Ministry of Education’s assessment, evaluation, and reporting policy.
The policy aims to maintain high standards, improve student learning, and benefit students, parents3,
and teachers in elementary and secondary schools across the province. Successful implementation of
this policy depends on the professional judgement4 of educators at all levels as well as on their ability to
work together and to build trust and confidence among parents and students.
A brief summary of some major aspects of the current assessment, evaluation, and reporting policy is
given below. Teachers should refer to Growing Success for more detailed information.
Fundamental Principles
View in ASL
The seven fundamental principles given below (excerpted from Growing Success, page 6) lay the
foundation for rich and challenging practice. When these principles are fully understood and observed
by all teachers, they will guide the collection of meaningful information that will help inform
instructional decisions, promote student engagement, and improve student learning.
To ensure that assessment, evaluation, and reporting are valid and reliable, and that they lead to the
improvement of learning for all students, teachers use practices and procedures that:
3 The word parent(s) is used on this website to refer to parent(s) and guardian(s). It may also be taken to
include caregivers or close family members who are responsible for raising the child.
4 “Professional judgement”, as defined in Growing Success (p. 152), is “judgement that is informed by
professional knowledge of curriculum expectations, context, evidence of learning, methods of
instruction and assessment, and the criteria and standards that indicate success in student learning. In
professional practice, judgement involves a purposeful and systematic thinking process that evolves in
terms of accuracy and insight with ongoing reflection and self-correction”.
Engaging in assessment from a CRRP stance requires that teachers gain awareness of and reflect on their
own beliefs about who a learner is and what they can achieve (see the questions for consideration
provided below). In this process, teachers engage in continual self-reflection – and the critical analysis of
various data – to understand and address the ways in which teacher identity and bias affect the
assessment and evaluation of student learning. Assessment from a CRRP stance starts with having a
deep knowledge of every student and an understanding of how they learn best.
The primary purpose of assessment is to improve student learning. Assessment for learning creates
opportunities for teachers to intentionally learn about each student and their sociocultural and linguistic
background in order to gather a variety of evidence about their learning in a way that is reflective of and
responsive to each student’s strengths, experiences, interests, and cultural ways of knowing. Ongoing
descriptive feedback and responsive coaching are essential for improving student learning.
Teachers engage in assessment as learning by creating ongoing opportunities for all students to develop
their capacity to be confident, independent, autonomous learners who set individual goals, monitor
their own progress, determine next steps, and reflect on their thinking and learning in relation to
learning goals and curriculum expectations. One way in which teachers differentiate assessment is by
providing tasks that allow multiple entry points for all students and that enable all students to design
and create personally meaningful assignments, projects, performances, and other demonstrations of
their learning.
The evidence that is collected about student learning, including through observations and conversations
as well as student products, should reflect and affirm the student’s lived experiences within their school,
home, and community, their learning strengths, and their knowledge of concepts and skills. This process
of triangulating evidence of student learning allows teachers to improve their understanding of how
each student is progressing in their learning.
When teachers engage in the process of examining their own biases regarding classroom assessment
and evaluation practices, they might consider some of the following questions:
• Are the tasks accessible to, and inclusive of, all learners? Do the tasks include appropriate and
varied entry points for all students?
• Do the tasks connect to students' prior learning and give them opportunities to be sense makers
and to integrate their new learning? Do the selected tasks reflect students’ identities and lived
experiences?
• Do all students have equitable access to the tools they need to complete the tasks being set?
• What opportunities can teachers build into their practice to offer students descriptive feedback
to enhance learning? Are graded assessment tasks used in a way that complements the use of
descriptive feedback for growth?
• How can information be conveyed about students’ learning progress to students and parents in
an ongoing and meaningful way?
• What is the purpose of assigning and grading a specific task or activity? Are student choice and
agency considered?
• How do teacher biases influence decisions about what tasks or activities are chosen for
assessment?
The development of learning skills and work habits is an integral part of a student’s learning. To the
extent possible, however, the evaluation of learning skills and work habits, apart from any that may be
included as part of a curriculum expectation in a course, should not be considered in the determination
of a student’s grades. Assessing, evaluating, and reporting on the achievement of curriculum
expectations and on the demonstration of learning skills and work habits separately allows teachers to
provide information to the parents and student that is specific to each of these two areas.
The six learning skills and work habits are responsibility, organization, independent work, collaboration,
initiative, and self-regulation.
The Ontario curriculum for Grades 1 to 12 comprises content standards and performance standards.
Assessment and evaluation will be based on both the content standards and the performance standards.
The content standards are the overall and specific curriculum expectations given in the curriculum for
every subject and discipline.
The performance standards are outlined in the achievement chart, also provided in the curriculum for
every subject and discipline (each achievement chart is specific to the subject/discipline; see the sample
charts provided). The achievement chart is a standard province-wide guide and is to be used by all
teachers as a framework for assessing and evaluating student achievement of the expectations in the
particular subject or discipline. It enables teachers to make consistent judgements about the quality of
student learning, based on clear performance standards and on a body of evidence collected over time.
It also provides teachers with a foundation for developing clear and specific feedback for students and
parents.
• provide a common framework that encompasses all curriculum expectations for all
subjects/courses across the grades;
• guide the development of high-quality assessment tasks and tools (including rubrics);
• help teachers plan instruction for learning;
• provide a basis for consistent and meaningful feedback to students in relation to provincial
content and performance standards;
• establish categories and criteria for assessing and evaluating students’ learning.
Assessment is the process of gathering information that accurately reflects how well a student is
achieving the curriculum expectations in a grade or course. The primary purpose of assessment is to
improve student learning. Assessment for the purpose of improving student learning is seen as both
“assessment for learning” and “assessment as learning”. As part of assessment for learning, teachers
provide students with descriptive feedback and coaching for improvement. Teachers engage in
assessment as learning by helping all students develop their capacity to be independent, autonomous
learners who are able to set individual goals, monitor their own progress, determine next steps, and
reflect on their thinking and learning.
Evaluation
View in ASL
Evaluation refers to the process of judging the quality of student learning on the basis of established
performance standards, and assigning a value to represent that quality. Evaluation accurately
summarizes and communicates to parents, other teachers, employers, institutions of further education,
and students themselves what students know and can do with respect to the overall curriculum
expectations. Evaluation is based on assessment of learning that provides evidence of student
achievement at strategic times throughout the course, often at the end of a period of learning.
All curriculum expectations must be accounted for in instruction and assessment, but evaluation focuses
on students’ achievement of the overall expectations5. Each student’s achievement of the overall
expectations is evaluated on the basis of the student’s achievement of related specific expectations. The
overall expectations are broad in nature, and the specific expectations define the particular content or
scope of the knowledge and skills referred to in the overall expectations. Teachers will use their
professional judgement to determine which specific expectations should be used to evaluate
achievement of the overall expectations, and which ones will be accounted for in instruction and
assessment but not necessarily evaluated.
Determining a report card grade involves the interpretation of evidence collected through observations,
conversations, and student products (tests/exams, assignments for evaluation), combined with the
5Beginning in the 2021–22 school year, schools are asked not to assess, evaluate or report on the
overall expectations related to social-emotional learning skills in The Ontario Curriculum, Grades 1–8,
Mathematics (2020) and The Ontario Curriculum, Grades 1–8, Health and Physical Education (2019). It is
the ministry’s expectation that instruction of the social-emotional learning skills will continue while
educators engage in ongoing professional learning.
Secondary
Seventy per cent of the final grade (a percentage mark) in a course will be based on evaluation
conducted throughout the course. This portion of the grade should reflect the student’s most consistent
level of achievement, with special consideration given to more recent evidence. Thirty per cent will be
based on a final evaluation administered at or towards the end of the course. This evaluation will be
based on evidence from one or a combination of the following: an examination, a performance, an
essay, and/or another method of evaluation suitable to the course content. The final evaluation allows
the student an opportunity to demonstrate comprehensive achievement of the overall expectations for
the course.
Elementary
Three formal report cards are issued in Ontario’s publicly funded elementary schools, as described
below.
The Elementary Progress Report Card shows a student’s development of learning skills and work habits
during the fall of the school year, as well as the student’s general progress in working towards
achievement of the curriculum expectations in each subject (reported as “progressing very well”,
“progressing well”, or “progressing with difficulty”).
The Elementary Provincial Report Card shows a student’s achievement at specific points in the school
year. The first Provincial Report Card reflects student achievement of the overall curriculum
expectations introduced and developed from September to January/February of the school year, as well
as the student’s development of learning skills and work habits during that period. The second reflects
achievement of curriculum expectations introduced or further developed from January/February to
June, as well as further development of learning skills and work habits during that period. The Provincial
Report Card for Grades 1–6 uses letter grades; the report card for Grades 7 and 8 uses percentage
grades.
Secondary
The Provincial Report Card, Grades 9–12, shows a student’s achievement at specific points in the school
year or semester. There are two formal reporting periods for a semestered course and three formal
Although there are formal reporting periods, communication with parents and students about student
achievement should be continuous throughout the year or course, by a variety of means, such as
parent-teacher or parent-student-teacher conferences, portfolios of student work, student-led
conferences, interviews, phone calls, checklists, and informal reports. Communication about student
achievement should be designed to provide detailed information that will encourage students to set
goals for learning, help teachers to establish plans for teaching, and assist parents in supporting learning
at home.
The categories represent four broad areas of knowledge and skills within which the expectations for any
given subject or course can be organized. The four categories should be considered as interrelated,
reflecting the wholeness and interconnectedness of learning.
The categories help teachers focus not only on students’ acquisition of knowledge but also on their
development of the skills of thinking, communication, and application.
Knowledge and Understanding. Subject-specific content acquired in each grade or course (knowledge),
and the comprehension of its meaning and significance (understanding).
Thinking. The use of critical and creative thinking skills and/or processes.
Application. The use of knowledge and skills to make connections within and between various contexts.
In all subjects and courses, students should be given numerous and varied opportunities to demonstrate
the full extent of their achievement of the curriculum expectations across all four categories of
knowledge and skills.
Teachers will ensure that student learning is assessed and evaluated in a balanced manner with respect
to the four categories, and that achievement of particular expectations is considered within the
appropriate categories. The emphasis on “balance” reflects the fact that all categories of the
achievement chart are important and need to be a part of the process of instruction, learning,
assessment, and evaluation. However, it also indicates that for different courses, the relative
To further guide teachers in their assessment and evaluation of student learning, the achievement chart
provides “criteria” and “descriptors”.
A set of criteria is identified for each category in the achievement chart. The criteria are subsets of the
knowledge and skills that define the category. The criteria identify the aspects of student performance
that are assessed and/or evaluated, and they serve as a guide to what teachers look for. Each curriculum
has subject- or discipline-specific criteria and descriptors. For example, in the English curriculum, in the
Knowledge and Understanding category, the criteria are “knowledge of content” and “understanding of
content”. The former includes examples such as forms of text and elements of style, and the latter
includes examples such as relationships among facts. “Descriptors” indicate the characteristics of the
student’s performance, with respect to a particular criterion, on which assessment or evaluation is
focused. Effectiveness is the descriptor used for each of the criteria in the Thinking, Communication, and
Application categories. What constitutes effectiveness in any given performance task will vary with the
particular criterion being considered. Assessment of effectiveness may therefore focus on a quality such
as appropriateness, clarity, accuracy, precision, logic, relevance, significance, fluency, flexibility, depth,
or breadth, as appropriate for the particular criterion.
Levels of Achievement
View in ASL
The achievement chart also identifies four levels of achievement, defined as follows:
Level 1 represents achievement that falls much below the provincial standard. The student
demonstrates the specified knowledge and skills with limited effectiveness. Students must work at
significantly improving in specific areas, as necessary, if they are to be successful in a subject or course in
the next grade.
Level 2 represents achievement that approaches the standard. The student demonstrates the specified
knowledge and skills with some effectiveness. Students performing at this level need to work on
identified learning gaps to ensure future success.
Level 4 identifies achievement that surpasses the provincial standard. The student demonstrates the
specified knowledge and skills with a high degree of effectiveness. However, achievement at level 4 does
not mean that the student has achieved expectations beyond those specified for the grade or course.
Specific “qualifiers” are used with the descriptors in the achievement chart to describe student
performance at each of the four levels of achievement – the qualifier limited is used for level 1; some for
level 2; considerable for level 3; and a high degree of or thorough for level 4. Hence, achievement at
level 3 in the Thinking category for the criterion “use of planning skills” would be described in the
achievement chart as “[The student] uses planning skills with considerable effectiveness”.
Three samples of the achievement chart are provided, from the following subjects/disciplines:
These three samples illustrate the consistent characteristics of the performance standards across all
subjects and disciplines and across all grades. The samples also illustrate how the achievement chart
varies – particularly with respect to the examples provided for the criteria in each category – to reflect
the nature of the particular subject or discipline. For instance, the examples for the criterion
“Application of knowledge and skills” in the Application category of the achievement chart for the arts
include performance skills, composition, and choreography, whereas those for science and technology
include investigation skills and safe use of equipment and technology.
As discussed in the preceding sections, the achievement chart identifies four categories of knowledge
and skills and four levels of achievement in the particular subject/discipline.
In addition to the considerations outlined in this curriculum context, all of the general "Program
Planning" sections on this site apply to this curriculum. Educators should review and implement these
general sections, as well as the components that appear below.
Language is the basis for thinking, communicating, and learning. Students need language skills to
comprehend ideas and information, to interact socially, to inquire into areas of interest and study, and
to express themselves clearly and demonstrate their learning. Learning to communicate by using
language with clarity and precision, and in a variety of media and modes, will help students to thrive in
the world beyond school and to become lifelong learners.
Literacy skills are embedded across the Ontario curriculum. However, literacy development lies at the
heart of the language curriculum. This curriculum emphasizes evidence-based systematic and explicit
instruction of foundational knowledge and skills, including oral language, word-level reading and
spelling, vocabulary, fluency, and comprehension. The systematic teaching of foundational knowledge
and skills is critically important. It requires focused and dedicated time and must follow a carefully
planned sequence for introducing specific concepts, knowledge, and skills. It must also happen in
purposeful and meaningful contexts where students are immersed in rich literacy experiences that
cultivate a sense of enjoyment about learning. These experiences must be grounded in responsive
teacher-student relationships.
Research has repeatedly demonstrated that strong oral communication skills are critical for academic
and vocational success as well as social-emotional well-being. Oral communication is a complex set of
skills that includes both oral language (i.e., listening comprehension and speaking) and non-verbal
Research shows that there is a strong connection between early oral language development and later
reading comprehension and writing ability. Strong reading comprehension occurs when students derive
meaning from oral language and combine it with fluency in reading words and texts. Oral language
continues to impact reading proficiency as students progress through school and build a growing
vocabulary. It is important to note that the process of reading acquisition will be different for students
whose first or primary language is American Sign Language (ASL). For these students, ASL and English
bilingual teaching methods are used for the development of biliteracy between ASL and English as a
second or additional language.
The language curriculum provides many opportunities for students to develop reading fluency and
comprehension as they progress through the elementary grades. A comprehensive and rigorous reading
program teaches students to read competently and critically, and provides students with opportunities
to read widely for the pleasure of reading and for the discovery of new information as well as for self-
discovery and self-enrichment. Reading materials should reflect the diversity of students in the
classroom and Canadian and world cultures, including First Nations, Métis, and Inuit cultures.
In the language program, students have the opportunity to read various forms of texts and to set
learning goals for their reading. This helps to develop and sustain their curiosity and excitement about
reading. In addition to reading teacher-selected materials that are well planned and purposefully chosen
to support instructional goals, students can choose from a wide variety of texts that are engaging and
relevant to their personal interests. In this way, literacy enhances students’ development of their sense
of self and their unique and shared identities. It fosters a deep appreciation of the diversity of human
experience and expression.
The language curriculum provides a strong foundation in both reading and writing, and emphasizes
teaching these two different skills in an interdependent way, so that one skill reinforces and strengthens
the other. The curriculum allows students to harness the power of the written word and develop higher-
order literacy skills. Students learn to research, synthesize, and organize information to create literary
and persuasive texts reflecting their thoughts, feelings, and ideas. Reading and writing enable students
to understand and tell stories about their communities, cultures, and histories, expressing their sense of
global citizenship or personal commitment. Through reading and writing, students become receptive to
new and varying ideas and perspectives and develop their ability to think independently and critically.
They can convince and be convinced and differentiate between what is true and what is misinformation.
In this way, literacy can help transform them and enable them to achieve their hopes and dreams.
The Ontario language curriculum recognizes the value of embedding literacy learning throughout the
day. Students must have authentic opportunities to apply their language and literacy skills in all subject
areas. The curriculum also recognizes the important role of other subject areas such as social studies,
history, geography, science, the arts, mathematics, and health and physical education in supporting the
growth of students’ vocabularies and background knowledge, both of which are critical components of
language comprehension. By building students’ foundational skills, the language curriculum enhances
each student’s learning across all subject areas. This fosters a love of learning and paves the way for
future success.
The study of language and the acquisition of literacy skills are not restricted to the language
program. Therefore, this curriculum emphasizes the integration of language and literacy
development across other subjects and disciplines. The curriculum provides examples to
illustrate how teachers can achieve this goal in the classroom.
Mandatory learning is described in the overall and specific expectations of the curriculum.
The overall expectations describe in general terms the knowledge and skills that students are expected
to demonstrate by the end of each grade. The specific expectations describe the expected knowledge
and skills in greater detail. The specific expectations are organized under numbered subheadings, each
of which indicates the strand and the overall expectation to which the group of specific expectations
corresponds (e.g., “B2” indicates that the group relates to overall expectation 2 in Strand B). This
organization is not meant to imply that the expectations in any one group are achieved independently of
the expectations in the other groups, nor is it intended to imply that learning associated with the
expectations happens in a linear, sequential way. The numbered headings are used merely as an
organizational structure to help teachers focus on particular aspects of knowledge, concepts, and skills
as they develop various lessons and learning activities for students.
In the language curriculum, the overall expectations outline standard sets of knowledge and skills
required for understanding and using the building blocks of language, understanding and responding to
texts, expressing ideas and creating texts, and making language and literacy connections in a diverse
range of contexts. For this reason, the overall expectations remain the same from Grades 1 to 8. The
curriculum focuses on developing the foundational knowledge and skills in the early primary grades. As
students progress into the middle and later elementary grades, these skills are reinforced and refined by
increasing the complexity of the texts they work with and the tasks they perform over time. This
approach reflects and accommodates the progressive nature of language learning.
The specific expectations reflect this progression in knowledge and skill development through changes
in the wordings of the expectations and through the introduction of new expectations, where
appropriate. The progression is captured by the increasing complexity of the teacher supports (see
below) associated with most expectations and by the increasing specificity of language and literacy
knowledge and skills, the diversity of contexts in which the learning is applied, and the variety of
opportunities presented for applying it. Note that all the skills specified in the early grades continue to
be developed and refined as students move through the grades, whether or not each of those skills
continues to be explicitly required in an expectation.
Teacher supports, such as the examples, teacher prompts, and instructional tips, are optional supports
that teachers can draw on to support teaching and learning, in addition to developing their own
supports that reflect a similar level of complexity. Whatever the specific ways in which the requirements
outlined in the expectations are implemented in the classroom, they must be inclusive and, wherever
possible, reflect the diversity of the student population and the population of the province.
The program in all grades is designed to ensure that students build solid foundations in language and
literacy, develop their analytical and critical thinking skills, and reflect on their learning. Acquiring the
knowledge and skills described in the expectations in the four strands of the language curriculum will
enable students to understand, respond to, appreciate, and create a full range of texts, including digital
and media texts.
Strand A is an overarching strand that focuses on literacy connections and applications that will enable
students to transfer skills and draw on knowledge from each of the other strands, other subjects, and
wider contexts. In strands B through D, students integrate Strand A expectations as they develop and
apply their understanding of strand-specific concepts. The chart below illustrates the relationships
among all four strands of this curriculum.
6The teacher supports will be made available at a later date, after the issuing of the curriculum
expectations and the curriculum context.
Students apply the seven transferable skills – critical thinking and problem solving; innovation,
creativity, and entrepreneurship; self-directed learning; collaboration; communication; global citizenship
and sustainability; and digital literacy – throughout their language and literacy learning. These skills help
students develop and express their unique voices and take ownership of and engage in their learning in
meaningful, authentic ways.
Students develop and apply digital media literacy knowledge and skills to support their learning. They
learn about their rights and responsibilities when interacting online and developing their digital identity,
learn to navigate online environments while managing their data, security, and privacy, including
seeking appropriate permission, and use digital and media tools to evaluate information and
demonstrate their learning. They learn and apply the conventions and techniques of digital and media
texts and analyze the relationship between text forms and content, audiences, and creators. They use
Students learn how to develop and apply their language and literacy knowledge and skills in their daily
lives and in cross-curricular and integrated learning contexts. As they explore the concepts of identity,
self, and sense of belonging and the lived experiences of a diversity of individuals within various
communities, including those in Canada, they can further develop an understanding of their own unique
identities. By analyzing themes in texts of various forms from First Nations, Métis, and Inuit individuals,
communities, groups, and nations, students can also develop their understanding of First Nations, Métis,
and Inuit identities, perspectives, relationships, legacies, and ways of knowing, being, and doing.
Oral and non-verbal communication are foundational components of language skills. Over the years,
students develop their listening and speaking abilities using a variety of strategies and skills, including
word choice and syntax, to become effective communicators.
In the early grades, students learn the beginning skills of word reading and spelling. These include
learning how to blend phonemes together to make up simple words and to segment words
into phonemes. This also includes learning grapheme-phoneme correspondences, and “sounding out”
by blending to read words and segmenting to spell words. In this way, phonemic awareness is largely
learned and practiced within the context of learning to read and spell words. Students learn to read by
applying knowledge of phonics, orthography, and morphology.
Throughout the grades, students continue to build and apply phonemic, phonics, orthographic,
morphological, and vocabulary knowledge to develop their spelling skills.
Students learn to understand and apply language conventions: syntax and sentence structure, parts of
speech, capitalization, and punctuation. In the contexts of oral communication and writing to
communicate meaning, students are continually learning these language conventions and applying their
knowledge and skills. They are becoming increasingly fluent readers and writers, which contributes to
their comprehension and written expression.
Strand B has two associated learning continua. The “Language Foundations Continuum for Reading and
Writing, Grades 1–4, Overall Expectation B2” in Appendix A provides an elaboration of the mandatory
learning. It describes the progression of foundational language knowledge and skills appropriate for
students in Ontario and is informed by evidence-based research on reading and language development.
The two continua show the progression of knowledge and skills in the following areas:
Language Foundations
• phonemic awareness
• alphabetic knowledge
• phonics: grapheme-phoneme correspondence
• word-level reading and spelling: using phonics knowledge
• word-level reading and spelling: using orthographic knowledge
• word-level reading and spelling: using morphological knowledge
• vocabulary
• reading fluency: accuracy, rate, and prosody
Language Conventions
As they read texts, students apply foundational knowledge and skills and draw on their vocabulary and
background knowledge. They integrate their developing knowledge of sentence structures, patterns,
and grammar to understand complex structures in individual sentences. They apply their understanding
of cohesive ties to integrate information within and across sentences in order to understand texts. They
learn about the patterns, features, and elements of style associated with various text forms and genres,
including digital, media, and cultural texts. They read, listen to, and view texts by creators with diverse
identities, perspectives, and experiences, including diverse First Nations, Métis, and Inuit creators.
Students develop comprehension strategies, drawing on their prior knowledge, visualizing to construct
mental models of texts, making and confirming predictions, and monitoring their comprehension by
asking questions and rereading.
Students learn printing, cursive, and word-processing skills. They learn to consider their purpose and
audience as they choose appropriate forms, genres, and media to create texts and to address various
topics of interest, including topics connected to their lived experiences. They use effective and
appropriate language to establish their voice, point of view, and perspectives, and to convey their
intended message. They apply their knowledge of language conventions in their writing and use text
patterns, features, and stylistic elements to express their ideas clearly and coherently and to achieve the
intended effects.
Across the grades, students learn to research and gather information. They develop the ability to verify
the reliability of sources and evaluate the currency, quality, bias, and accuracy of information. They
learn how to appropriately acknowledge the works of others using accepted forms of documentation.
Throughout the process of creating texts, students apply transferable skills and digital media literacy,
seek feedback from others, critically analyze their own texts, reflect on their use of techniques, tools,
and technology, and consider how to improve as text creators. They develop the competencies and
confidence to express ideas and communicate clearly and effectively using written language.
High-quality, evidence-based instruction, coupled with a classroom environment that promotes joy,
engagement, and motivation, is the key to students developing proficient language skills. Effective
language and literacy instruction begins with teachers having an understanding of the scientific research
related to language and literacy acquisition, knowing the complex identities and profiles of students,
having high academic expectations for and of all students, providing supports when needed, and
believing that all students are capable of becoming successful language learners.
Effective language and literacy instruction is grounded in scientific evidence and is student-centred and
asset-based. It builds on students’ lived experiences, strengths, passions, interests, and language and
cultural resources. It aims to build strong foundational skills while working to develop habits of mind
such as curiosity, flexibility, and open-mindedness; a willingness to question and think critically; and an
awareness of the value of literacy. It takes place in a safe and inclusive learning environment, where all
students are valued, empowered, engaged, and able to take risks, reflect on their learning, and
approach the learning in a confident manner. In such an environment, the sharing of literacy
experiences as a literacy community is critical to building a sense of student belonging and motivation.
Teachers use responsive instructional practices, including reading aloud everyday with fluency and
accuracy, direct instruction, and guided practice, with ongoing assessment of learning to develop
students’ skills.
Language is foundational to literacy and to learning in all other subject areas. Reading is one of the most
fundamental learning and life skills. It affects all academic achievement and is associated with social,
emotional, economic, and physical health. However, learning to read does not happen naturally.
Reading is a process involving specific skills that need to be taught through systematic and explicit
instruction, as outlined in the next section.
This curriculum emphasizes that foundational language and literacy knowledge and skills need to be
taught through evidence-based systematic and explicit instruction, often referred to as structured
literacy.
Educators will also take into consideration that all students come to school with different prior early
language experiences. Their use and understanding of oral language will be far more developed than
their early reading and writing skills, which require a higher degree of explicit systematic instruction.
Educators can use students’ existing oral language skills, developed through authentic interactions and
relationships, to begin to intentionally develop the early literacy skills required to access and understand
print.
Systematic instruction involves a carefully planned sequence for instruction of specific concepts, skills,
and procedures, with the prerequisite skills taught first.
The term systematic is often paired with the term explicit in reading instruction to refer to employing
instructional strategies that are evidence-based. For example, explicit systematic phonics instruction
involves:
Gathering timely and ongoing assessment data is crucial in identifying a student’s progress in acquiring
the language and literacy skills being taught. It can also help teachers to tailor classroom instruction to
meet an individual student’s needs, as well as support early identification of students who may require
intervention beyond classroom instruction.
Structured literacy instruction involves consideration of not only what is taught, but also how it is
taught. A structured literacy approach to language and literacy learning provides systematic and explicit
instruction that is carefully sequenced based on the language skill progression. It cumulatively builds on
previous knowledge, is adjusted to meet individual students’ needs, and is informed by ongoing
assessment.
More information on systematic and explicit strategies to teach early reading can be found in the
ministry publication Effective Early Reading Instruction: A Teacher's Guide, 2022.
Language instruction is not only about teaching the linguistic knowledge and skills involved in written
and spoken communication; it is also multimodal, and involves engaging students’ multiple sensory
modalities, from oral and visual to aural, gestural, and spatial. Multimodal literacy instruction focuses on
the interplay among the different modalities as students receive information, make meaning, represent
ideas, and express their thinking.
Multimodal literacy instruction highlights the diverse text forms, modes, and media used to
communicate meaning in various contexts and communities. Recognizing that today’s students engage
with texts in multiple modes, ranging from written, oral, visual, and audio texts to multimodal forms, as
well as text forms and genres from various cultures, and in print and digital environments, multimodal
instruction draws on a variety of teaching methods. These methods help students develop their ability
to make meaning of the texts they encounter and to create texts to communicate meaning using various
modes, media, forms, and technologies. Students connect their lived experiences and knowledge of
various language and text conventions to make sense of texts in new ways. Multimodal literacy
instruction also facilitates translanguaging – the use of different languages together – so that students
who communicate in more than one language can naturally and fluidly use their multiple linguistic,
literacy, and cultural resources to develop knowledge and skills in the instructional language.
The language program should provide rich opportunities for students to engage in both listening and
speaking. Students need many opportunities to interact with others to understand how oral
communication works (e.g., conversation, discussion, teamwork, oral presentation). To communicate
effectively, they need opportunities to engage in effective listening, to demonstrate understanding of
what is being said, and to consider various perspectives. Oral communication begins with all students
being able to express their needs and wants as well as being able to present and share their ideas
through commenting and questioning. Oral communication skills support students in discussing
strategies for solving a problem, presenting and defending ideas or debating issues, and offering
critiques of work produced by their peers. With practice and guidance, students gradually become able
to express themselves clearly and confidently.
Oral communication instruction should focus on the identification and development of the skills and
strategies students use to understand and interact effectively with others. It should also emphasize the
use of higher-order thinking skills to stimulate students’ interest and engage them in their own learning.
For all students to benefit from the opportunities provided for listening and speaking, differences in the
norms and conventions associated with oral communication in different social and cultural contexts
must be taken into account.
Teachers support students in developing the knowledge and skills to express their ideas and opinions by
developing norms and language for respectful discourse, including how to present and respond to each
other during discussions. They teach foundational knowledge and skills explicitly and systematically,
model learning strategies, encourage students to talk through and reflect on their thinking and learning
Students in every language classroom vary in their identities, lived experiences, linguistic resources,
personal interests, learning profiles, and readiness to learn new knowledge and skills. Universal Design
for Learning and differentiated instruction are robust and powerful approaches to support students in
developing the foundational knowledge and skills that they need to become critical thinkers and
problem solvers. To ensure that each student has opportunities to be challenged and to succeed
requires teachers to attend to student differences and provide flexible and responsive approaches to
instruction. Universal Design for Learning and differentiated instruction can be used in combination to
help teachers respond effectively to the strengths and needs of all students.
The aim of the Universal Design for Learning framework is to assist teachers in designing language
programs and environments that provide all students with equitable access to the language curriculum.
Within this framework, teachers engage students in multiple ways to support them in becoming
successful in their language learning. Teachers respond to students’ diverse learner profiles by designing
tasks that offer individual choice, are relevant and authentic, provide graduated levels of challenge, and
foster collaboration in the language classroom. Teachers also engage multimodalities to help students
become resourceful and flexible learners. For example, teachers use a variety of media to ensure that
students are provided with alternatives for auditory and visual information; they model the use of
language conventions and vocabulary; and they highlight text patterns, text structures, text features,
and stylistic elements of texts to support students in developing fluency and proficiency. Teachers
create an environment in which students can express themselves in multiple forms. For example,
teachers can improve access to tools or assistive devices that are necessary for learning; encourage the
use of students’ first or other language(s); vary ways in which students can demonstrate their
understanding of and respond to texts; support students in setting goals, planning, and organizing ideas
and information for text creation using multimodal digital tools; and engage students in reflective
practices throughout their language learning.
While Universal Design for Learning provides teachers with broad principles for planning language
instruction and learning experiences for a diverse group of students, differentiated instruction allows
them to address specific skills and learning needs. Differentiated instruction is rooted in assessment and
involves purposefully planning varied approaches to teaching the content of the curriculum. Teachers
will identify the areas of learning need and plan the instruction and learning that will address the needs
of individual students. Teachers identify the products and the ways in which students can best
demonstrate their learning, and consider how their learning is affected by the physical learning
environment. Differentiated Instruction is student-centred and involves a strategic blend of whole-class,
small-group, and individual learning activities to suit students’ differing strengths, interests, and levels of
readiness to learn.
The implementation of a tiered approach to language and literacy instruction is the responsibility of all
classroom teachers as well as other educators. It is not specifically or only the responsibility of special
education teachers. In the classroom, student progress is frequently monitored, and early and ongoing
assessment data is used to identify skill gaps and determine the appropriate level and intensity of
instruction. The intensity of instruction is increased in several ways: by reducing the group size; by
increasing the degree of explicitness and individualization; by sequentially targeting skill gaps of greater
number and/or depth; and by increasing the length (in minutes), frequency (per week), and duration
(number of weeks or months) of instructional sessions, as needed. A tiered approach designed to
address the diverse learning needs of students can be implemented as follows:
• Tier 1: Classroom-based assessment and instruction are planned for all students, with teachers
applying the principles of Universal Design for Learning and differentiated instruction.
Observation and progress monitoring are used to ensure that students who are experiencing
difficulty are provided with more intensive instruction in a timely fashion. To plan and provide
effective Tier 1 instruction, teachers are supported by other educators as needed (e.g., by
grade-level teams).
• Tier 2: In addition to Tier 1 instruction and based on assessment data, teachers provide more
intensive instruction and interventions in the classroom for small groups (three to five students)
and/or for individual students experiencing learning challenges in particular or general areas of
language and literacy. Students may be provided with Tier 2 instruction based on the number
and/or depth of skill gaps identified in initial assessments, or if Tier 1 progress monitoring shows
that they are not gaining the skills as expected. Student progress in response to this level of
intensity is closely monitored, and instruction is adjusted as needed. Teachers collaborate with
other educators as needed in order to provide effective support for the students.
• Tier 3: In addition to Tier 1 instruction and based on assessment data, teachers provide
intensive support and intervention for very small groups (two to three students) and/or for
individual students who are experiencing difficulties in particular areas of language and literacy,
regardless of whether they have an Individual Education Plan (IEP) or an identified special
education need. Students may be provided with Tier 3 instruction based on the number and/or
depth of skill gaps identified in initial assessments, or if Tier 1 or 2 progress monitoring show
that they are falling behind. Precise and personalized assessment and instruction are often
planned with the support of other educators, including a special education teacher, and student
progress in response to this level of intensity continues to be closely monitored.
The tiered approach ensures responsive, timely, and effective instruction that improves student
learning, reduces the likelihood that a student will struggle or develop language difficulties in the future,
and facilitates the earlier introduction of more intensive interventions for students with significant
learning difficulty, regardless of whether they have an identified learning disability or other special
education need. It is important to understand that Universal Design for Learning and differentiated
instruction are integral aspects of the tiered approach and of an inclusive language program. The
learning needs of a significant majority of students, including students with special education needs, can
be met using Tier 1 Universal Design for Learning and differentiated instruction principles and
approaches, along with evidence-based, systematic, and explicit instruction. More information on
Universal Design for Learning and differentiated instruction can be found in the ministry
publication Learning for All: A Guide to Effective Assessment and Instruction for All Students,
Kindergarten to Grade 12, 2013. Ministry guidance in Learning for All related specifically to reading
instruction and assessment has been superseded by this curriculum.
The language and literacy program builds on students’ prior knowledge, their cultures, and their
language experiences at home and in the community. Effective instruction offers students choices,
encourages a sense of agency in learning, and further motivates and engages students in language and
literacy learning and in the development of self-efficacy. Students should recognize themselves in their
language-learning experiences, in the literacy environment of the classroom, and in the broader physical
surroundings of the school while also having the opportunity to enjoy reading a wide variety of texts and
learning about diverse identities, abilities, experiences, families, cultures, and communities.
When educators plan for differentiated language and literacy instruction using various grouping
strategies, they purposefully select texts and learning resources to support student learning in a rich,
authentic, and meaningful context. They consider the following guiding questions:
• How are the selected texts and resources connected to and aligned with the curriculum
expectations?
• Are the learning resources and texts reflective of the students’ various identities, interests,
knowledges, lived experiences, and linguistic resources?
• Is the selection of learning resources, such as decodable texts used for decoding instruction,
grounded in scientific reading research that follows an evidence-based scope and sequence? Are
the resources developmentally appropriate to support students’ skill progression?
• For early readers with developing decoding skills, are texts carefully selected to provide
opportunities for more advanced language learning through read-alouds of books with rich and
diverse vocabulary, language structures, and content?
The following principles guide teachers in planning and teaching language programs for students with
special education needs and students with disabilities, and benefit all students in developing
foundational language and literacy skills:
• All teachers play a critical role in student success in language and literacy learning.
• Language and literacy instruction is based on an asset-oriented pedagogical model that draws
on the valuable funds of knowledge and the various identities, abilities, resources, and
experiences that all students bring to their language and literacy learning.
• Early assessment of students’ language and literacy skills is important for providing instruction
that prevents later learning difficulties. The ongoing assessment of foundational knowledge and
skills of students with special education needs and disabilities is critical in informing the
precision of the instruction and providing responsive tiered support.
An effective language and literacy learning environment and program that is inclusive of students with
special education needs and students with disabilities is purposefully planned with the principles of
Universal Design for Learning and differentiated instruction in mind and integrates the following
elements:
• employing student-centred strategies that actively build on students’ strengths, interests, and
motivations to improve their language and literacy learning and increase their engagement, by:
• providing ample opportunities for them to communicate their wants, needs, thoughts,
and opinions to others; to ask and respond to questions; and to demonstrate their
learning using a variety of modes of communication (e.g., linguistic, visual, gestural,
technologically assisted);
• encouraging the development of their critical thinking skills in literacy by building
foundational knowledge and skills;
• using direct instruction to systematically and explicitly teach foundational knowledge and skills,
and providing many opportunities for guided practice, descriptive feedback, modelling, and
coaching;
• considering students’ individual use of language and communication modalities; for example,
some students require the use of American Sign Language (ASL), Braille, or Augmentative and
Alternative Communications Systems;
• providing required instructional, environmental, and/or assessment accommodations and/or
modifications as specified in the student’s Individual Education Plan (IEP). Accommodations may
include the use of learning tools such as sound walls and visual dictionaries, augmentative and
alternative communication devices, and access to assistive technology such as text-to-speech
and speech-to-text programs;
• teaching the foundational knowledge and skills of receptive and expressive communication
while providing opportunities for students to practise specific and scaffolded grade-level skills in
social situations (e.g., engaging in reciprocal interaction with others, verbally or non-verbally);
• supporting students in the development of executive function skills through scaffolding,
modelling, and practicing the use of organizational tools, ensuring directions and explanations of
strategies are clear and explicit;
• Pedagogical approaches are multimodal and facilitate translanguaging, whereby students use
linguistic resources from their full linguistic repertoires. They emphasize language learners’
rights to develop and use their first language and voices in the classroom to inform their
learning.
• A multilingual classroom that encourages creative and strategic translingual practice enables
students to use their linguistic repertoire in a fluid and dynamic way, mixing and meshing
languages to communicate, interact, and connect with peers and teachers for a variety of
purposes, such as when developing foundational literacy knowledge and skills and when
making, creating, and communicating meaning through various texts and media. When students
are engaged in cross-curricular learning tasks, translanguaging also supports knowledge transfer
and affirms the cultural and linguistic identities of students.
• Culturally responsive and relevant pedagogy (CRRP) recognizes students’ various cultural and
linguistic identities as critical resources in language and literacy instruction and learning.
Knowledge of English language learners’ strengths, interests, and identities, including their
social and cultural backgrounds, is important. These funds of knowledge are historically and
culturally developed skills and assets that are central to creating a richer and more meaningful
learning experience for all students and promoting a socially and linguistically inclusive learning
environment.
• Cross-linguistic learning contexts enable students to draw on their languages, digital media,
visuals, and mediating devices to develop metalinguistic awareness and to further their
development and engagement in language and literacy learning.
• An initial assessment of newcomer students’ level of English-language proficiency is required in
Ontario schools. Where possible, at least part of the initial assessment should be conducted in
the student’s first language to gain a broader view of the student’s language and literacy
development.
In a supportive language and literacy learning environment, scaffolding the learning offers English
language learners the opportunity to:
• access their other language(s) (e.g., by using digital tools to access vocabulary and terminology
in their first language and multimodal representations of concepts), background knowledge, and
prior learning and language experiences;
• benefit from flexible language pedagogies that facilitate translanguaging, such as the use of and
creation of dual language books as an instructional strategy;
• develop identity texts within classrooms. Identity texts are artefacts created by students that
can be made by engaging a variety of modalities. These texts promote discussion about
students’ cultural and linguistic backgrounds;
• learn new concepts and skills in authentic, meaningful, and familiar contexts;
• engage in open and parallel tasks to allow for multiple entry points for learning;
• work in a variety of settings that support co-learning and multiple opportunities for practice
(e.g., with partners or in small groups, as part of cooperative learning, or in group conferences);
• access the language of instruction during oral, written, and multimodal instruction and
assessment, during questioning, and when encountering texts, learning tasks, and other
activities in the language program;
• use oral language in different strategically planned activities, such as “think-pair-share”, “turn-
and-talk”, and “adding on”, to express their ideas and engage in literacy discourse;
• develop both everyday and academic vocabulary, including domain-specific vocabulary in
context, through explicit instruction, through rephrasing and recasting by the teacher, and
through using student-developed bilingual word banks or glossaries;
• practise using sentence frames adapted to their English-language proficiency levels to
communicate their understanding, ask questions, express their ideas, and explain their thinking;
• use a variety of concrete and/or digital learning tools and engage multimodalities to
demonstrate their learning and thinking (e.g., orally, visually, kinesthetically), through a range of
representations (e.g., oral presentation, portfolios, displays, discussions, dramatization), and in
multiple languages (e.g., multilingual word walls and anchor charts);
Strategies used to differentiate instruction and assessment for English language learners also benefit
many other learners in the classroom, since programming is focused on leveraging all students’
strengths, meeting learners where they are in their learning, being aware of the language demands (e.g.,
the academic vocabulary) in the program, and making learning and thinking visible.
English language learners in English Literacy Development (ELD) programs in Grades 3 to 8 require
accelerated support to develop both their literacy skills and their English language proficiency. These
students have significant gaps in their formal education because of limited or interrupted prior
schooling. Culturally responsive and relevant practices are fundamental in recognizing and connecting to
the informal literacies these students may have. They may bring a deep knowledge of the local customs
and ways of knowing in their home culture, oral language skills, and/or social skills. These students often
require focused support over a longer period than students in English as a Second Language (ESL)
programs. The use of the student’s oral competence in languages other than English is a non-negotiable
scaffold. The strategies described above, such as the use of visuals, the engagement of multimodalities,
the development of everyday and academic vocabulary, the use of technology, and the use of oral
competence, are essential in supporting student success in ELD programs.
Supporting English language learners is a shared responsibility. Collaboration with administrators and
other teachers, particularly ESL/ELD teachers and relevant community representatives, where possible,
contributes to creating equitable outcomes for English language learners. Additional information on
planning for and assessing English language learners can be found in the “Planning for English Language
Learners” subsection of "Considerations for Program Planning”.
The strategic use of technology to support the achievement of the curriculum expectations requires a
strong understanding of:
Teachers will find various digital tools useful in their teaching practice, for student-centred learning, for
whole class instruction, and for the design of curriculum units that contain varied approaches to learning
to meet diverse student needs.
Technology can be used to support the processes involved in the language curriculum: to facilitate
access to information (e.g., accessing relevant and credible web-based content); and to allow better
communication and collaboration (e.g., working with peers in collaborative documents, connecting with
experts, and communicating with teachers). Assistive technologies are critical in enabling some students
with special education needs to have equitable access, meaningfully engage with curriculum material,
and take part in classroom activities and must be provided in accordance with students’ Individual
Education Plan (IEP), as required.
The use of technology in the language curriculum also provides opportunities for students to develop
their transferable skills, including digital literacy. When using technology to support the teaching and
learning of language, teachers consider the issues of student safety, privacy, and ethical responsibility,
respect and inclusion, and student well-being.
Although the internet is a powerful learning tool, all students must be made aware of issues of privacy,
safety, and responsible use, as well as of the ways in which the internet can be used to promote hatred.
In all grades, students also need to be reminded of the ethical issues relating to plagiarism and
appropriation. In a digital world that provides quick access to abundant information, it is very easy to
copy the words, music, or images of others and present them as one’s own. Both blatant and nuanced
Teachers understand the importance of technology and how it can be leveraged to support learning and
to ensure that the language curriculum expectations can be met by all students. Additional information
can be found in the “The Role of Information and Communications Technology” subsection of
“Considerations for Program Planning”.
In cross-curricular learning, students are provided with opportunities to learn and use related content
and/or skills in two or more subjects. For example, teachers can use social studies texts in their language
lessons, and incorporate instruction in how to read and view non-fiction texts into their social studies
lessons. In mathematics, students learn to apply their language and literacy skills to extract and interpret
relevant information from a variety of representations, such as a given table, a graph, or an equation, to
determine the 100th term of a pattern. They also learn when and how to use various modalities to
represent mathematical information and express their thinking. For example, students can create a
pattern using concrete materials and describe their pattern using gestures, words, algebraic expressions,
or equations.
In every subject, students learn subject-specific terminology and how to use it with precision to
communicate effectively. All subjects provide many opportunities for them to develop their language
and literacy skills with authentic purposes for reading, writing, listening, speaking, viewing, and
representing.
Creative and critical thinking are at the heart of learning in all subject areas. For example, in science,
students consider diverse perspectives as they develop innovative, ethical, and effective solutions to
societal and environmental problems. In language, students are encouraged from a very early age to
develop their ability to ask questions, to create texts addressing topics on diversity and inclusion, and to
explore a variety of possible answers to those questions. As they progress through the grades, students’
critical thinking skills become more sophisticated as they learn that all sources of information have a
particular point of view and that the recipient of the information has a responsibility to evaluate it,
identify explicit and implicit biases, determine its validity and relevance, and use it in appropriate ways.
The ability to locate, question, and validate information allows a student to become an independent,
lifelong learner.
Many expectations from the arts and language curricula can be linked to create integrated units and
provide students with rich literacy experiences. For example, students will apply their language and
literacy skills when describing and responding to works of art, and their arts literacy skills when
interpreting, creating, and publishing multimodal or multimedia texts. Role-playing7, a key component of
the Drama strand in the arts curriculum, can be used to enhance students’ understanding of texts, to
present a variety of points of view, and to explore new interpretations of texts. Students can draw
storyboards as they develop, evaluate, and revise multimedia texts. They can use their understanding of
cultural contexts and critical thinking skills to strengthen their critical analysis in the arts.
7When students are engaged in role-playing, the teacher should make important decisions about how
to apply drama strategies so that students are looking at the perspectives and retelling information, and
not speaking in first person through the lens of another person’s lived experiences, including those that
may involve topics pertaining to identity, racism, human rights violations, and acts of genocide.
8 The word parent(s) is used on this website to refer to parent(s) and guardian(s). It may also be taken to
include caregivers or close family members who are responsible for raising the child.
9 “Professional judgement”, as defined in Growing Success (p. 152), is “judgement that is informed by
professional knowledge of curriculum expectations, context, evidence of learning, methods of
instruction and assessment, and the criteria and standards that indicate success in student learning. In
professional practice, judgement involves a purposeful and systematic thinking process that evolves in
terms of accuracy and insight with ongoing reflection and self-correction”.
The achievement chart identifies four categories of knowledge and skills and four levels of achievement
in Language. (For important background, see “Content Standards and Performance Standards” in the
general "Assessment and Evaluation" section that applies to all curricula.)
Learning and assessment related to the expectations in Strand A occurs within the context of learning
related to strands B through D. Student achievement of the expectations in Strand A are to be assessed
and evaluated throughout the year and may be included in the comment section of the report card.
To guide teachers in their assessment and evaluation of student learning, the achievement chart
provides “criteria” and “descriptors” within each of the four categories of knowledge and skills.
A set of criteria is identified for each category in the achievement chart. The criteria are subsets of the
knowledge and skills that define the category. The criteria identify the aspects of student performance
that are assessed and/or evaluated, and they serve as a guide to what teachers look for. In the language
curriculum, the criteria for each category are as follows:
• knowledge of content (e.g., morphology; syntax; text features; text forms and genres; strategies
used when understanding and responding to texts and when expressing ideas and creating
texts)
• understanding of content (e.g., concepts; opinions; facts; perspectives; relationships among
facts, ideas, concepts, themes)
Thinking
• use of planning skills (e.g., identifying the purpose for reading; identifying the topic, purpose,
audience, form, and medium for writing; generating ideas; gathering information; researching;
organizing information and ideas)
• use of processing skills (e.g., making inferences, interpreting, analyzing, identifying bias,
synthesizing, evaluating, forming conclusions)
• use of critical/creative thinking processes (e.g., researching; comparing and evaluating strategies
and tools used by various creators; creating; considering and appreciating diverse perspectives;
reflecting on their learning)
Communication
Application
• application of knowledge and skills (e.g., concepts, strategies, processes) in familiar contexts
• transfer of knowledge and skills (e.g., concepts, strategies, processes) to new contexts
• making connections within and between various contexts (e.g., between the text and their own
knowledge and lived experiences, other texts, the world around them, and First Nations, Métis,
and Inuit perspectives and ways of knowing; between disciplines)
“Descriptors” indicate the characteristics of the student’s performance, with respect to a particular
criterion, on which assessment or evaluation is focused. Effectiveness is the descriptor used for each of
the criteria in the Thinking, Communication, and Application categories. What constitutes effectiveness
in any given performance task will vary with the particular criterion being considered. Assessment of
effectiveness may therefore focus on a quality such as appropriateness, clarity, accuracy, precision,
logic, relevance, significance, fluency, flexibility, depth, or breadth, as appropriate for the particular
criterion.
Language Foundations Continuum for Reading and Writing, Grades 1–4, Overall Expectation B2
These language conventions need to be introduced and developed within the contexts of writing,
reading, and oral communication, rather than in isolation, so that students can learn to use them to
communicate and comprehend in meaningful ways. Emphasis should be placed on the function and role
of a structure within a sentence, instead of simply its name. Although learning is embedded in context,
instruction should still follow a thoughtful, purposeful sequence, systematically teaching conventions
from simple to complex. Instruction should focus on supporting students in understanding the function
of these conventions in well-crafted sentences, and in using them to build correct, sophisticated
sentences that effectively communicate meaning.
Legend
Overall expectations
Throughout Grade 5, in connection with the learning in strands B to D, students will:
Specific expectations
Throughout Grade 5, in connection with the learning in strands B to D, students will:
Specific expectations
Throughout Grade 5, in connection with the learning in strands B to D, students will:
Digital Citizenship
A2.1 explain their rights and responsibilities when interacting online with appropriate permission, and
make decisions that contribute positively to the development of their digital identity and those of their
communities
Specific expectations
Throughout Grade 5, in connection with the learning in strands B to D, students will:
B. Foundations of Language
Overall expectations
By the end of Grade 5, students will:
Specific expectations
By the end of Grade 5, students will:
Specific expectations
By the end of Grade 5, students will:
Vocabulary
B2.2 demonstrate an understanding of a variety of words, acquire and use explicitly taught vocabulary in
various contexts, including other subject areas, and use generalized morphological knowledge to analyze
and understand new words in context
Specific expectations
By the end of Grade 5, students will:
i
For an at-a-glance view of the mandatory learning across grades, see Appendix B:
Language Conventions Continuum for Reading and Writing, Grades 1–9, Overall
Expectation B3.
Grammar
B3.2 demonstrate an understanding of the functions of parts of speech in sentences, including direct
objects for nouns, intensive and reflexive pronouns, proper adjectives, and correlative conjunctions, and
use this knowledge to support comprehension and communicate meaning clearly
Specific expectations
By the end of Grade 5, students will:
Elements of Style
C1.5 describe various elements of style in texts, including voice, word choice, word patterns, and
sentence structure, and analyze how each element helps create meaning and is appropriate for the text
form and genre
Specific expectations
By the end of Grade 5, students will:
Reflecting on Learning
C2.7 explain how strategies such as visualizing, making predictions, summarizing, and connecting to
their experiences have helped them comprehend various texts
Specific expectations
By the end of Grade 5, students will:
Literary Devices
C3.1 describe literary devices, including imagery and humour, in a variety of texts, and explain how they
help create meaning and are appropriate for the intended purpose and audience
Making Inferences
C3.2 make local and global inferences, using explicit and implicit evidence, to extend their
understanding of various texts
Analyzing Texts
C3.3 analyze various texts, including literary and informational texts, by identifying main and supporting
ideas, sequencing the events of multiple plots, recording relevant information, and explaining cause and
effect
Indigenous Contexts
C3.7 explain how texts created by First Nations, Métis, and Inuit individuals, communities, groups, or
nations are influenced by historical periods, cultural experiences, and events, and how they relate to
current lived experiences
Reflecting on Learning
C3.8 identify the critical thinking skills they used to analyze and evaluate various texts, and explain how
these skills have helped them better understand the texts
Specific expectations
By the end of Grade 5, students will:
Developing Ideas
D1.2 generate and develop ideas and details about various topics, such as topics related to diversity,
equity, and inclusion and to other subject areas, using a variety of strategies, and drawing on various
resources, including their own lived experiences
Organizing Content
D1.4 select and classify ideas and collected information, using appropriate strategies and tools, and
sequence content, taking into account the chosen text form, genre, and medium
Reflecting on Learning
D1.5 describe the strategies and tools that helped them develop ideas and organize content for texts of
the chosen forms, genres, and media, and explain how they helped them improve as a text creator
Specific expectations
By the end of Grade 5, students will:
Producing Drafts
D2.1 draft texts of various forms and genres, including narrative, persuasive, and informational texts,
using a variety of media, tools, and strategies
Voice
D2.3 establish a personal voice in their texts, using varied language and elements of style to express
their thoughts, feelings, and opinions about a topic, and using a tone appropriate to the form and genre
Revision
D2.5 make revisions to the content of draft texts and to elements of style, such as word choice, and add
or delete sentences, to improve clarity, focus, and coherence, seeking feedback
Specific expectations
By the end of Grade 5, students will:
Reflecting on Learning
D3.3 describe various strategies and tools that helped them communicate their intended message when
publishing and presenting texts, and suggest steps for future improvement as a text creator
Language, Grade 6
Expectations by strand
A. Literacy Connections and Applications
This strand focuses on students applying the seven transferable skills in language and literacy contexts,
developing digital media literacy skills, applying language and literacy learning in other contexts, and
engaging with texts that foster understanding of diverse identities, experiences, perspectives, histories,
Overall expectations
Throughout Grade 6, in connection with the learning in strands B to D, students will:
Specific expectations
Throughout Grade 6, in connection with the learning in strands B to D, students will:
Specific expectations
Throughout Grade 6, in connection with the learning in strands B to D, students will:
Digital Citizenship
A2.1 explain their rights and responsibilities when interacting online with appropriate permission, and
make decisions that contribute positively to the development of their digital identity and those of their
communities
Specific expectations
Throughout Grade 6, in connection with the learning in strands B to D, students will:
B. Foundations of Language
Overall expectations
By the end of Grade 6, students will:
Specific expectations
By the end of Grade 6, students will:
Specific expectations
By the end of Grade 6, students will:
Vocabulary
B2.2 demonstrate an understanding of a variety of words, acquire and use explicitly taught vocabulary in
various contexts, including other subject areas, and use generalized morphological knowledge to analyze
and understand new words in context
Specific expectations
By the end of Grade 6, students will:
Grammar
B3.2 demonstrate an understanding of the functions of parts of speech in sentences, including nouns
that are gerunds, distinguishing and converting between active and passive voice, and use this
knowledge to support comprehension and communicate meaning clearly
Specific expectations
By the end of Grade 6, students will:
Elements of Style
C1.5 identify various elements of style in texts, including voice, word choice, word patterns, and
sentence structure, and analyze how each element helps create meaning and is appropriate for the text
form and genre
Point of View
C1.6 identify the narrator’s point of view, including first, second, or third person, in a variety of texts,
providing evidence, and explain how using an alternative point of view would change each story
Specific expectations
By the end of Grade 6, students will:
Reflecting on Learning
C2.7 explain and compare how various strategies, such as visualizing, making predictions, summarizing,
and connecting to their experiences, have helped them comprehend various texts, and set goals to
improve their comprehension
Specific expectations
By the end of Grade 6, students will:
Literary Devices
C3.1 describe literary devices, including hyperbole and idioms, in a variety of texts, and explain how they
help create meaning and are appropriate for the intended purpose and audience
Analyzing Texts
C3.3 analyze various texts, including literary and informational texts, by identifying main and supporting
ideas, evaluating the quality of information and its relevance for a specific purpose, and formulating
conclusions
Indigenous Contexts
C3.7 assess the influence of historical periods, cultural experiences, and/or socio-political conditions and
events on texts created by First Nations, Métis, and Inuit individuals, communities, groups, or nations,
and how they relate to current lived experiences
Reflecting on Learning
C3.8 compare the critical thinking skills they used when analyzing and evaluating various texts, identify
the skills that best supported their understanding, and explain why they were effective
Specific expectations
By the end of Grade 6, students will:
Developing Ideas
D1.2 generate and develop ideas and details about various topics, such as topics related to diversity,
equity, and inclusion and to other subject areas, using a variety of strategies, and drawing on various
resources, including their own lived experiences
Research
D1.3 gather information and content relevant to a topic, using multiple textual sources; summarize the
information; verify the reliability of sources; and record the creator and source of all content created by
others
Organizing Content
D1.4 classify and sequence ideas and collected information, using appropriate strategies and tools, and
identify and organize relevant content, taking into account the chosen text form, genre, and medium
Reflecting on Learning
D1.5 explain and compare how the strategies and tools used helped them develop ideas and organize
content for texts of the chosen forms, genres, and media, and how they helped them improve as a text
creator
Specific expectations
By the end of Grade 6, students will:
Producing Drafts
D2.1 draft complex texts of various forms and genres, including narrative, expository, and informational
texts, using a variety of media, tools, and strategies
Voice
D2.3 establish a personal voice in their texts, using varied language and elements of style to express
their thoughts, feelings, and opinions about a topic, and using a tone appropriate to the form and genre
Revision
D2.5 make revisions to the content, elements of style, patterns, and features of draft texts, and add and
delete sentences to improve clarity, focus, and coherence, using various strategies and seeking and
selectively using feedback
Reflecting on Learning
D3.3 compare how various strategies and tools helped them communicate their intended message
when publishing and presenting texts, and suggest future steps for improvement as a text creator