Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 26 views

    In P02a Big STR DRS 0054 - 2178

    Uploaded by

    karthikmr85
    The document is a review sheet for a proposed methodology to repair rebar that was cut during bearing installation for the Indore Metro Rail Project. In the first sentence, the general consultant notes that the proposed methodology of cutting and welding rebars is not allowed and not accepted. In the second sentence, they refer to a previous email from February 16th conveying this. In the third sentence, the document provides the status code of "E" meaning the methodology was not approved.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    In P02a Big STR DRS 0054 - 2178

    Uploaded by

    karthikmr85
    26 views1 page
    The document is a review sheet for a proposed methodology to repair rebar that was cut during bearing installation for the Indore Metro Rail Project. In the first sentence, the general consultant notes that the proposed methodology of cutting and welding rebars is not allowed and not accepted. In the second sentence, they refer to a previous email from February 16th conveying this. In the third sentence, the document provides the status code of "E" meaning the methodology was not approved.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    IN-P02A-BIG-STR-DRS-0054_2178

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document is a review sheet for a proposed methodology to repair rebar that was cut during bearing installation for the Indore Metro Rail Project. In the first sentence, the general consultant notes that the proposed methodology of cutting and welding rebars is not allowed and not accepted. In the second sentence, they refer to a previous email from February 16th conveying this. In the third sentence, the document provides the status code of "E" meaning the methodology was not approved.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    26 views1 page

    In P02a Big STR DRS 0054 - 2178

    Uploaded by

    karthikmr85
    The document is a review sheet for a proposed methodology to repair rebar that was cut during bearing installation for the Indore Metro Rail Project. In the first sentence, the general consultant notes that the proposed methodology of cutting and welding rebars is not allowed and not accepted. In the second sentence, they refer to a previous email from February 16th conveying this. In the third sentence, the document provides the status code of "E" meaning the methodology was not approved.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    PROJECT NAME Indore Metro Rail Project PROJECT NO/CONTRACT ID.

    : IN 2A/01 Indore

    DISCIPLINE: STR DOCUMENT TYPE: Document Review Sheet (DRS ) Issue Comment Status by The Engineer

    ORIGINATOR: General Consultant 1. Major 1. Pending


    2. Minor 2. Hold
    DRS NUMBER: IN-P02A-BIG-STR-DRS-0054 0
    3. Closed
    REV.:

    DATE: 06-Apr-23

    TRANSMITTAL NO./ LETTER No. & DATE: IN-P02A-DBL-DCM-LTR-2178, dated 19-01-2023

    SUBJECT: FCR for repair methodology of rebar cut during Bearing installation

    Document references
    Comment Status by The
    No. Initials Reviewers Comments (GC) Issue Contractors/Suppliers Answers Closure Date
    Engineer
    Doc / Rev Clause Page No:

    Cutting and welding of rebars is not allowed, therefore the proposed methodology is not
    1 SMJ/MRK General Major
    accepted. The same was already conveyed through mail dated: 16-02-2023

    Status Code Legend:


    A. Approved C. SONO : Statement of No Objection E. Fail/Not approved
    Document Review Status Code: E
    B. Approved with comments D. NOWC: No Objection with comments F. Responded/Reviewed/Actioned

    Please note that as per GCC Sub Clause 3.2; any acceptance, agreement, approval, check, certificate, comment, consent, disapproval, examination, inspection, instruction, Notice, No-objection, record(s) of meeting, permission, proposal, record, reply, report, request, Review, test, valuation, or similar act (including the absence
    of any such act) by the Engineer, the Engineer's Representative or any assistant shall not relieve the Contractor from any duty, obligation or responsibility the Contractor has under or in connection with the Contract.

    General Consultant CONTRACTOR


    Discipline Head /
    Initials Positions SIGN ISSUED BY Reviewer’s Name Approved By:
    Coordinator

    S.M.Jampani PBR Chief Structural Expert NAME: Simon Fourie Name Name

    Reviewers Initials Positions SIGN POSITION: The Engineer Position: Position:

    M.R.Karthik MRK Design Expert


    M.R.K Digitally signed
    by M.R.Karthik
    SIGN:
    Date Date

    arthik
    Date: 2023.04.06
    Sign Sign
    18:06:31 +05'30'

    Document Review Sheet(DRS) 1

    You might also like