Sheratyldr 604 Ethicspaper
Sheratyldr 604 Ethicspaper
Sheratyldr 604 Ethicspaper
Scott Heraty
Advertising is a very important tool for companies or groups. When used for its natural
purpose it can educate a group of consumers about the benefits of a particular topic. This topic
could be a consumer product or political issue or any myriad of issues. The purpose is to change
the target viewer of said advertising into agreeing with the message. A company’s goal is to
convince you that you need their product. A political candidate will try and convince you that
they are the right choice for your vote. The mere existence of advertising is to sway opinions.
This truth lends itself to controversy. When one party tries to convince another of something that
can cause blow back. Any link in the chain of advertising can find issue with the message or
means of relaying that message. This paper will show research of this subject and its effects on
groups, especially children. As a father and healthcare provider, I find this subject very pertinent
Internet advertising
In the age of social media and internet marketing, advertising on the internet is a valuable
tool for companies and groups. Metadata on internet users provides advertisers with valuable
information when developing target marketing. I have experienced this first hand when
marketing an ad on Facebook for a target market. I can advertise to a specific region, age range,
income level, interests, education level, etc. However, advertising in the internet age must
quickly grab one’s attention. When scrolling through social media advertisers must find a way to
make you stop and watch. They may make their ad specifically controversial to draw attention.
Ads that are controversial can be defined as “advertising which aims to shock or offend
3
audiences through the violation of norms, and such ads are perceived by audiences to be
provocative or obscene” (Moraes & Michaelidou, 2017). These ads main goal is to shock you
into looking. Many ads have to categorize themselves so some parental controls can block these
from showing up when children are using the internet. These ads also get play on platforms such
as YouTube. This drives the urge to become controversial so that they will get the added
attention of press and free YouTube views. Pepsi and Burger King created ads years ago that
placed them in the crosshairs of controversy. Pepsi’s ad depicted an act of suicide and Burger
King advertised a search for “virgin” Whopper eaters. The backlash created press and free
advertising in the coverage. These instances through negative press can actually boost a
company’s bottom line (Zerillo, 2008). Super Bowl ads are very commonly designed to quickly
grab your attention. They also get many people to search them out on YouTube and rewatch
them. This saves a company ad dollars. Social media giants such as Google and Facebook
attempt to be neutral by providing means for users to advertise their wares and views. However,
estimates have shown that digital advertising is now surpassed television and radio in ad dollars
Advertising to children
service that allow children to watch videos on many different topics without delay or channel
accessibility. However, advertisements played before, during or after the videos are most often
something completely unrelated to the subject. This can cause a child to see an advertisement for
a horror movie prior to watching a toy unboxing video. This has affected my children in the past.
4
They may have permission to watch a particular video but the content I cannot control, the ads, I
may deem inappropriate. Advertisers feel the need to be controversial or edgy on these platforms
to attract the youth-based demographics that frequent them (Allossery, 1999). Advertisers also
use deception techniques to advertise to kids. Kids have a more limited understanding and
education level naturally so advertisers don’t have to work as hard to sell them. Deceptions can
and phrases, and distracting attention (Barry, 1980). This is a common practice when advertising
to kids. An ad may show a table full of toys and the children in it are very excited. The deception
may lie in the fact that the ad is for only one of those toys. The cost seems fair to the child
because they think they are getting it all but bound to be let down when they only get the single
action figure. They may not have the cognitive ability to understand the person reading “other
toys sold separately” very quickly at the end of the commercial. In addition, ads can portray
sexual role stereotypes. These stereotype driven ads can have belittling language related to its
message. It can relay that only males or females are meant for this product. It can do this by only
including one gender in the advertising or using language specifically speaking to one gender.
Many researchers have given advertisers data to find the ideal times and content to pair their ads
with (Macklin & Kolbe, 1984). Research has shown that pairing ads with known characters kids
trust can be beneficial for advertisers. The younger demographics will relate and trust what a
favorite character is telling them. Data has shown that this can also be a malicious way to
deceive children. The controversial practice of using cartoons to advertise tobacco has been
abolished. Cartoons can also give children a false sense of a desired outcome. A cartoon can
make it appear to children that a certain food can give them super strength or abundance of
5
energy. It can also make basketball shoes seem to have the ability to increase your jump by feet
(Stuart Van Auken & Subhash, 1985). These unrealistic and leading ads can be unfair and
deceptive to children. The stakeholders are many when it comes to advertising product to
children. From companies, to suppliers to YouTube channels that review and use these products.
The stakeholders rely on maximum sales and positive press. If deceptive techniques are used to
advertise to kids then this can affect the whole chain of stakeholders.
Advertisements for tobacco and alcohol are regulated but incredibly effective. Ad execs
attempt to relay a sense of fun to be had by using their products. The younger demographics also
respond to this message. More has been done to curb these influences on youth. Also, anti-
smoking campaigns have made an impact. Researchers have found that ads showing the effect of
health long term do not resonate with kids. They believe they will live forever. Advertising the
anti-smoking message to kids is difficult to do. Each child may find a different reason important
enough to stay away. Ads using individuals’ kids respect or look up to has found success. If an
athlete explains why he or she chooses not to smoke a child has a higher chance of resonating
with that due to a similar sport they may play (Ono, 1995). Alcohol advertisements attempt to
use humor and fun to attract younger people. Showing their product associated with youth-
oriented music and activities attracts multiple age brackets. Adults wish to remain young and
younger people want to enjoy the good times depicted in the humorous ads. Young people derive
from these images and scenes what they believe the experience of alcohol is before ever drinking
any. They perceive the positive influence it has on the actors and they believe it will also be
6
positive for them (Waiters, Treno, & Grube, 2001). These advertisements have been regulated
over the years. Much has been done to address this issue. Socially, when these ads to cross the
line a negative response can bring these companies in check. The shareholders include the
customer and they have the ultimate voice. If a company does not present itself with malice and
deceptive intent the consumer can boycott the product and create negative press.
Conclusion
Many advertisers use deception and illusion to sell their products. It may be intentional or
simply the use of hard researched data. The fact is that advertisers know they have minimal time
to attract the maximum number of potential consumers. Stakeholders are many in these
companies. Execs, suppliers, retailers, internet influencers, and consumers all have an equal role
in the success of a product. Advertisers have to quickly influence the consumer into loving what
they have to offer. I believe that all advertising is persuasive by nature but it is subjective that is
may be deceptive or controversial. What may offend one consumer may be acceptable to
another. In regards to my personal experience I know I have been persuaded to make many
purchases for good and for bad. My children have used to videos on YouTube, that I know have
been paid advertisements, to round out a Christmas or birthday wish list. As a stakeholder myself
I know all I can do is show my patronage to products and companies I believe in and refuse those
I deem deceptive.
7
References
Allossery, P. (1999, Apr 30). Broad future for controversial ads Every subgroup will have an
Macklin, M., & Kolbe, R. H. (1984). Sex role stereotyping in children's advertising; Current and
Moraes, C., & Michaelidou, N. (2017, Mar). Introduction to the Special Thematic Symposium on
the Ethics of Controversial Online Advertising. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(2), 231-
233.
Nicas, J. (2017, Mar 22). Google Steps Up Effort to Keep Ads Away From Controversial
Content; Alphabet unit acts after backlash over ads displayed next to fake news or
terrorist videos including content that attacks or harasses. Retrieved from Wall Street
Journal:
8
https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.sienaheights.edu/docview/1879409201/5989BE931
B6F4F08PQ/3?accountid=28644
Ono, Y. (1995, Aug 30). Advertising: Teenagers tell which antismoking ads work. Wall Street
Journal, p. B1.
Stuart Van Auken, L., & Subhash, C. (1985). Children's perceptions of characters: Human versus
14(000002), 13.
Waiters, E. D., Treno, A. J., & Grube, J. W. (2001, Winter). Alcohol advertising and youth: A
focus-group analysis of what young people find appealing in alcohol advertising. 28(4),
695-718.
Zerillo, N. (2008, Dec 15). Controversial ads can help boost a brand. U.S. ed, 11(49), 4.