Establish Quality Standard
Establish Quality Standard
Establish Quality Standard
Service standards are an important element of service management excellence; they help clarify
expectations for clients and employees, enable performance management, and support client
satisfaction. Over time, this Guideline will contribute to enhancing coherence across the
Government of Canada in the area of service standards. It also supports the work of the Red Tape
Reduction Commission that indicated a desire among stakeholders for clear service standards
from government.
A service standard is a public commitment to a measurable level of performance that clients can
expect under normal circumstances.
When developing service standards, the organization should consider its resources and expected
level of demand for regular day-to-day service operations (normal circumstances). Special
circumstances where regular service standards may not apply include holidays, the end of April
for tax filing, natural disasters, or emergencies. These are circumstances that are typically not
within the organization's control.
Service standards are integral to good client service and to effectively managing performance.
They help clarify expectations for clients and employees, drive service improvement, and
contribute to results-based management. Service standards reinforce government accountability
by making performance transparent, and increase the confidence of Canadians in government by
demonstrating the government's commitment to service excellence.
1
Service standards serve two key purposes:
To provide staff with performance targets ("Phone must be answered within three rings");
and
To inform clients what to expect ("Waiting time is less than 10 minutes").
Many organizations have implemented service standards that serve these purposes.
The purpose of the target is to help manage operations and track progress against overall delivery
objectives. The target is typically designed for management use but can also be made available to
the public. Table 1 below provides examples that distinguish between a service standard and an
operational performance target.
Keep in Mind
Operational performance targets are a good starting point. Working from a target to a meaningful
external service standard can save design time and effort.
Service standards are distinct from service pledges. Specifically, a service pledge is a public
commitment to a basic code of conduct and generally consists of a qualitative statement
expressed within values and principles. A pledge can provide the overarching service direction
for an organization and provide context to the service standard development process.
The following are examples of service pledges from the Economic Development Agency of
Canada for the Regions of Quebec: "We undertake to provide our clientele with quality service."
"We serve our clients courteously and professionally." "We serve our clients in the official
language of their choice."
2
Characteristics of a Good Service Standard
Relevant to the client: Service standards are consistent with client priorities and address
aspects of the service they value most within available resource allocations.
Based on consultation: Service standards are developed in consultation with clients,
managers, staff, and other partners in service delivery to ensure that they are meaningful
and match the organization's mandate.
Measurable: Service standards are quantifiable and linked to monitoring activities.
Consistent across government: Service standards should be consistent throughout
federal organizations providing similar services. Having similar service standards across
government for similar services helps both clients and government. Clients will find it
easier to deal with different organizations, and the organizations themselves will find it
easier to share best practices and adopt common approaches.
Ambitious but realistic: Service standards are realistic, based on analysis and consistent
with objectives, yet sufficiently challenging to service providers.
Endorsed by management: Service standards are understood and endorsed by senior
management.
Communicated: Service standards are clearly communicated to clients, employees, and
other stakeholders to help manage expectations.
Transparent: Service standards are monitored and reported to senior management, and
performance results are published to ensure transparency and client trust.
Continuously updated: Service standards are regularly reviewed and updated as
appropriate.
Note: These are general characteristics and practitioners should refer to policy-specific
requirements when developing their standards.
There are three types of service standards: access, timeliness, and accuracy. In deciding what
kinds of service standards to establish, organizations are encouraged to focus their efforts on
areas of greatest importance to the clients they serve and program
3
Diversification Canada
"Respond to written
[benefit and credit]
"WD will provide a funding
enquiries and to telephone
"We provide 90% of decision to a client within
referrals from the Call
Canadians with access to 90 business days of
Centres with the correct
our services within 50 receiving a complete
information, and process
kilometres of where they funding proposal. If the 90-
new recipient information,
live." day standard will not be met
including issuing a
on a project, the client will
payment, notice, or letter,
be contacted on the delay."
accurately."
Canada-Ontario Business
Service Centre Veterans Affairs Canada
Department of
Immigration and
"The information you "You will be advised in
Citizenship (Australia)
request will be provided by writing of our decision
your choice of fax, mail, or [relating to eligibility for
"We will regularly review
e-mail. Faxes and e-mails the Public Service Health
and update information to
will be sent within three Care Plan] within 4 weeks
ensure it is current and
hours of your call. Mail is of receiving your signed
meets your needs and
sent the same day if your and completed application
expectations."
call is received before 3:00 form."
p.m. (Eastern Time)."
Many services provided by the Government of Canada require clients to fulfill certain
obligations. Service standards can be conditional upon clients satisfying their obligations, in
which case they should be incorporated into the service standard.
When integrated with corporate planning and reporting activities, service standards are a useful
tool to support overall organizational management:
4
The Treasury Board Policy on Management, Resources and Results Structures requires
departments to establish a Program Alignment Architecture (PAA) identifying and
grouping related activities and linking them logically to the Strategic Outcomes they
support and providing "the framework to link expected results and performance measures
to each program at all levels of the PAA and for which actual results are reported."
Service standards comprise one source of information used to develop a
performance measurement framework related to services.
Part III of the Estimates process requires that departments prepare departmental
expenditure plans consisting of a Report on Plans and Priorities (RPP) and a
Departmental Performance Report (DPR). Service standards help express and
formulate performance objectives and should be incorporated into the business
planning process. Reporting on performance against service standards helps demonstrate
progress toward expected results.
The Management Accountability Framework (MAF) sets out the Treasury Board's
expectations for effective performance. One of the 10 elements that make up the MAF is
"citizen-focused service." Service standards are an essential component in achieving
service excellence and directly contribute to advancing results-oriented management
activities.
1. Establish priorities;
2. Plan and develop service standards;
3. Implement service standards;
4. Measure performance against service standards; and
5. Act on the results.
Figure 1 lays out the overall process (inside circle) and presents the specific steps included under
each phase (outside circle). While 5 phases and 15 steps are presented in a sequential order, some
can be undertaken concurrently. The remainder of this Guideline outlines this methodology and
provides helpful tools and guidance to successfully implement service standards throughout the
life cycle. Some organizations have experienced some common challenges and
5
Figure 1. Phases and Steps in Life-Cycle Management of Service Standards
6
Step 1: Take Stock
The first step to developing service standards is to review the services your organization delivers.
Consider the following:
Has government set priorities for service that should be taken into account?
What service standards already exist across the organization? Are there gaps that should
be addressed first?
Do other organizations offer similar services for which service standards already exist or
are being developed?
Is the organization compliant with existing policies and legislation with regard to service
standards?
Are other parts of the organization in the process of reviewing or establishing service
standards right now?
This review will help you understand the context, including government priorities related to
service. It will also raise awareness of similar services offered by other federal departments and
agencies. Where possible, comparable service standards should be considered for similar
services, and best practices shared across the organization.
Adopting an integrated management approach for service standard development, review and
oversight can further encourage the development of a balanced service portfolio. A service
inventory, or catalogue of the services that are delivered by an organisation, can assist in this
area and a separate guideline is devoted to this topic.
Service standard development and implementation can apply to internal and external services.
Please keep in mind that all government departments provide services to their employees and in
certain cases to other federal organizations. These internal services in turn can enable front-line
staff to deliver services to the public.
7
Step 2: Connect Service Standards to Organizational Priorities
Once you have taken stock, the next step is to identify which services should be priorities for
service standard development. To help decide where to focus efforts first, it is useful to ask the
following questions:
Which services have the broadest reach, largest impact on clients, or are rights and
benefits related?
Are there services that involve substantial risk for clients and government if expectations
and performance associated with service delivery are not clear?
How many services already have service standards in place? Are they up-to-date and
published?
Are there major services with their own distinct client groups that do not currently have
service standards? If so, do other organizations already have service standards in place
for similar services that could serve as a model?
Are there Treasury Board policies or applicable legislation requiring service standards?
Answering these questions will position the organization to decide where to focus efforts first.
The selection of priorities may involve balancing several considerations, including clients' needs,
resources, alignment with government or organizational priorities, and the existence of
comparable service standards in other organizations that could serve as a model (in order to save
time and effort, and promote alignment across organizations). Beginning with a manageable
number of priorities can help provide focus and create the opportunity for early successes.
Visible support and engagement from senior management in the development of service
standards are essential.
Including the development of a business case, a project brief, or a project charter helps secure
senior management approval from the outset. It explains the expected reach and impact of the
proposed service standards, clarifies roles and responsibilities, describes the overall service
standards project schedule, and provides essential details regarding the consultation and approval
process. Designating a service standard "champion" or sponsor can further help by integrating
and aligning service standard development efforts.
8
Checklist for Phase I
Phase II consists of: developing service standards, assessing monitoring capacity, validating
proposed service standards, and determining the performance methodology and measurement
framework.
9
Step 3: Develop Service Standards
This involves examining how the service standards will contribute to the organization's mandate
and business activities.
Consult
In addition to reviewing the service context, consultation can provide other valuable information
to develop and manage service standards. Input can shed light on aspects of the service that are
viewed as most important, such as current client satisfaction levels, changes in client needs and
expectations, and the roles and responsibilities of each party. Consultation can include focus
groups, telephone or online surveys, feedback forms, and one-on-one meetings.
Before engaging in consultation activities, consult your departmental Public Opinion Research
Coordinator for guidance and to ensure compliance with the Communications Policy of the
Government of Canada.
Consulting with front-line staff and considering innovative ideas for improving service.
Consulting with service delivery partners such as other organizations and private sector
partners to fully understand roles, responsibilities, and operational constraints.
Determining the aspects of service delivery that are most important to recipients of the
service.
Identifying areas where clients propose changes or problem areas that require
improvement.
Identifying client priorities relative to the targeted level of service.
Linking service standards to client satisfaction measurement allows an organization to target the
most relevant areas of improvement, ensuring that the standards are meaningful and easily
understood by the client and that progress is being made.
10
Identify the Service Standard Type
Reviewing the service context and consulting key stakeholders will assist in providing an
understanding of both what is valued from a client perspective and feasible from an
organizational perspective. It will also help identify which types of standards are the most
appropriate for the service.
As indicated earlier in Table 2, there are three types of standards: access, timeliness, and
accuracy. For example, what might be most important to clients applying to a grants and
contributions program is the time required to receive approval for their application. In this case, a
timeliness service standard best responds to client needs.
Service standards should be based on clients' needs and be expressed in a way that is easy to
understand, and consider available human and financial resources. Strike a balance between
client expectations, internal capacity and priorities. Adopting a risk management approach is an
important step in crafting strong services standards.
Over the past decade, the Institute for Citizen-Centered Service (ICCS) has conducted research
studies in the area of service needs and expectations. Chapter 5 of Citizens First 5 focuses on
service standards and on what Canadians consider timely services.
Developing clear statements that describe the public commitment to service, taking into
account the information collected through consultations, dialogue with legal and
communications service groups, your organization's communications strategy and overall
performance monitoring approach. For services that require a great deal of time to deliver
outputs, such as decisions on appeals, intermediate service standards could be set for
timeliness at different stages in the process to facilitate client expectations.
Developing realistic internal targets for each standard.
Crafting a monitoring strategy.
Establishing a process to collect constructive information and resolve issues raised by various
stakeholders is fundamental. Elements to consider include:
11
One example is a record that includes the nature, source and description of each
complaint.
Ensuring the redress mechanism is publicly available and easy to locate.
After reviewing comments, concerns and complaints, inform clients of any changes
made.
Performance against the service standard will be regularly monitored. An organization needs to
ensure it has sufficient capacity to monitor and evaluate performance, and report against the
service standards. This capacity will require the necessary resources and infrastructure to support
performance evaluation.
An evaluation branch or other similar unit that specialize in undertaking statistical analysis or
conducting internal audits can help identify successful and practical approaches to performance
measurement.
Your organization's legal services group should be involved in the development process for
service standards from the beginning and regularly review the proposed wording to eliminate
potential legal liabilities.
Ensure that the proposed standards are realistic, attainable, and measurable. Carrying out a pilot
project or test can help secure manager and staff support and verify that the standards are
meaningful to clients.
12
As part of the validation process, consider:
When developing performance methodology and timing for a suite of services, consider the
following:
Once performance indicators have been identified for the service standards, they will need to
integrate these into a performance framework. The framework should cover each of your service
standards and clearly indicate how the organization is assessing their progress. The aim should
be to provide a clear and comprehensive picture of the organization's achievements and should
be linked to the overall organizational performance framework.
Remember that performance activities should be relevant, timely, systematic, affordable, based
on evaluation parameters, and aligned with the other applicable planning, monitoring, and
accountability activities.
Once the service standards have been defined and a plan for tracking performance and measuring
achievements developed, approval should be sought from senior management. Be sure to include
next steps such as an implementation plan, publishing the results and making any future changes
to the service standards.
With the service standard priorities already established, an implementation plan indicates when,
where, and how service standards will be applied to departmental services.
Set time frames associated with key deliverables and milestones for each service partner
in the process.
Identify potential risks that might affect the implementation of service standards, and
establish mitigation strategies.
Examine constraints and opportunities for efficiency linked to standard implementation,
and develop strategies to address them.
Develop a strategy to monitor progress.
14
Implementing service standards may require restructuring existing processes or introducing new
systems. Decisions to modify or introduce new processes or systems should be carefully thought
out. Consider:
Which tools and resources are required? To maximize efficient service standard
implementation, determine which tools, such as a tracking database, and which resources,
such as who will be responsible for collecting the information, are required to
successfully move forward.
Does the change make sense? The decision should be based on a risk analysis exercise,
taking into account implications, including financial, to the organization. Consider if this
could be combined with another tool or system to reduce effort and cost.
When and how quickly should change be implemented? When assessing appropriate
timing to modify or introduce new processes, strike a balance between the drivers for
change and your organization's human and financial capacity.
What information and training are needed and for whom? To foster smooth
implementation, clearly communicate the expected benefits and the rationale for the
change and identify any training needs.
Training activities help ensure that employees and service delivery partners have the resources to
meet the service standards and understand what is expected of them. Training provides the
opportunity to clarify roles and responsibilities and answer questions that relate to the standards
and their implementation.
Assess the degree of formality required. Minor service changes call for informal training
sessions; more complex service changes require sophisticated training activities.
Determine the most appropriate structure, such as instructor-led courses, workshops, self-
service training modules, information sessions, Q&A workshops, and staff retreats.
Focus on essential knowledge and skills such as service process, complaint mechanisms,
and communication and analytical abilities needed to successfully meet the service
standards.
Always use plain language when communicating your service standards to clients. Ensure that
they are clear, easily understandable, and readily available to clients.
16
The measurement of service standard performance enables the analysis of trends and
identification of potential areas for improvement. A well-designed measurement process helps
determine:
Whether the service is consistent within and across delivery channels such as in person,
telephone, mail, and the Web.
How well the service is being performed compared with similar services provided by
other organizations (benchmarking); and
Whether the service performance level is improving over time and by how much.
Performance should be measured regularly to establish progress against baseline data, and
performance measures related to service standards should be incorporated into the overall
performance measurement strategy.
Objectivity:
Collect data through impartial sources such as Web hits.
Timeliness:
Review data periodically to ensure that the service is performing at the desired level and
to identify any needed adjustments.
Accuracy:
Verify data and confirm accuracy.
Consistency over time:
Measure performance in the same way for each assessment to facilitate results
comparison throughout the standard life cycle.
Clarity:
Data should present a clear picture of performance and make it easy to identify future
trends.
17
Examine overall performance against each individual standard such as access, timeliness,
and accuracy as appropriate.
Analyze the results of monitoring activities and identify trends, issues, and progress.
Compare standards and results with similar services both within the department and in
other organizations (benchmarking).
Consider other evaluation activities, such as client satisfaction measurement,
consultations, and operational reviews. Identify any gaps or successes.
The results of this evaluation should then be reported to senior management to provide
intelligence on how their organization is meeting its service goals and should highlight areas of
success and where additional attention may be required.
Communicating performance results can help manage client expectations about the level and
consistency of service. It can also provide staff with objective feedback on how well they are
meeting the standards.
18
9. Phase V: Act on the Results
The final phase is examining the performance-monitoring findings and acting on those results to
enhance performance.
Once evaluation of performance results has been completed, determine the future course of
action, including what measures should be taken to maintain or enhance service quality. Table 4
outlines three scenarios and possible courses of action.
In cases of reports or complaints regarding unmet service standards, determine what happened. A
first step is re-examining the reliability of the performance measurement system and its data. In
some cases, interviewing selected staff and clients can be helpful in diagnosing the issue. When a
genuine occurrence of unmet service standards is established, determine whether it was due to a
systemic issue that will cause performance to fall short on an ongoing basis or whether it was
due to unusual or exceptional one-time circumstances such as sudden increases in intake or
workload, sudden changes to legislation or practice, or a high level of absenteeism due to illness.
20
and changing
organizational
priorities into
account.
Engage employees and service delivery partners to offer suggestions for improvement
and identify potential solutions.
Monitor implementation of change to quickly identify any problem areas.
Show flexibility and allow for modifications to occur throughout the overall process.
10. Conclusion
When used effectively, service standards can be an important tool for organizations to manage
their portfolio of services for the public. This Guideline has outlined a clear process for service
standard development, measurement and improvement at an organizational level. When
developing service standards related to transfer payment programs, user fees, or regulation,
consult these policy centers for specific advice.
21