Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 72 views

    Comment To FOE - GRP 1

    Uploaded by

    Glorianne Esperanza
    The prosecution objects to several exhibits offered by the defense in the criminal case of People vs Nelly R. Fowler. The prosecution argues that Exhibit 1 does not establish the innocence of the accused. Exhibit 2 and 3 are objected to as being self-serving. Exhibit 4 is irrelevant to proving the accused did not commit the crime. Exhibit 5 is objected to as being misleading based on contradictory statements in another exhibit. The prosecution admits the existence of the exhibits but objects to their purpose.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Comment To FOE - GRP 1

    Uploaded by

    Glorianne Esperanza
    72 views3 pages
    The prosecution objects to several exhibits offered by the defense in the criminal case of People vs Nelly R. Fowler. The prosecution argues that Exhibit 1 does not establish the innocence of the accused. Exhibit 2 and 3 are objected to as being self-serving. Exhibit 4 is irrelevant to proving the accused did not commit the crime. Exhibit 5 is objected to as being misleading based on contradictory statements in another exhibit. The prosecution admits the existence of the exhibits but objects to their purpose.

    Original Description:

    Comment to Formal Offer of Evidence

    Original Title

    Comment to FOE - Grp 1

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The prosecution objects to several exhibits offered by the defense in the criminal case of People vs Nelly R. Fowler. The prosecution argues that Exhibit 1 does not establish the innocence of the accused. Exhibit 2 and 3 are objected to as being self-serving. Exhibit 4 is irrelevant to proving the accused did not commit the crime. Exhibit 5 is objected to as being misleading based on contradictory statements in another exhibit. The prosecution admits the existence of the exhibits but objects to their purpose.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    72 views3 pages

    Comment To FOE - GRP 1

    Uploaded by

    Glorianne Esperanza
    The prosecution objects to several exhibits offered by the defense in the criminal case of People vs Nelly R. Fowler. The prosecution argues that Exhibit 1 does not establish the innocence of the accused. Exhibit 2 and 3 are objected to as being self-serving. Exhibit 4 is irrelevant to proving the accused did not commit the crime. Exhibit 5 is objected to as being misleading based on contradictory statements in another exhibit. The prosecution admits the existence of the exhibits but objects to their purpose.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 3

    Republic of the Philippines

    FIRST JUDICIAL REGION


    MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT IN CITIES
    Branch 6
    Baguio City

    PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES,


    Plaintiff,
    Criminal Case No. 08282
    For: QUALIFIED THEFT
    –versus-
    NELLY R. FOWLER,
    Accused.
    x - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x
    COMMENT TO THE FORMAL OFFER OF EVIDENCE
    OF THE DEFENSE
    The Prosecution, with the assistance of the, through the undersigned
    counsel and unto this Honorable Court, most respectfully submits his
    Comment to the Formal Offer of Evidence of the Defense, to wit:

    EXHIBITS DOCUMENT/OBJECT COMMENT


    “1” Judicial Affidavit of Mr.
    Riano Innocente The prosecution objects to the
    purpose of the offer specifically that
    which seeks to establish the
    whereabouts of the accused after
    the time of the commission of the
    alleged crime.
    The time he saw the accused is
    contradicting to the official recorded
    time of the incident in the complaint
    and police blotter filed by the
    complainant, as the interval of 9:30
    am to 9:40 am would have been too
    short of a time for the accused to
    leave the premises.

    Further, the silence of the accused


    when asked about the incident does
    not establish the innocence of the
    accused, despite the state of shock
    she was in.
    Certification of Police
    The prosecution admits only the
    Blotter - Police Station 9,
    existence of the exhibit but objects
    Baguio City
    “2” to the purpose for which they are
    Blotter Entry: 01-1156 being offered for being self-serving.
    Page Number: 456

    The prosecution admits only the


    existence of the exhibit but objects
    to the purpose for which they are
    being offered for being self-serving.
    “3” Medical Certificate
    It does not establish that those
    injuries were directly caused by Mr.
    Hermita and Ms. Pagsamo at the
    time of the incident.

    The prosecution admits only the


    existence of the exhibit but objects
    to the purpose for which it was
    offered for being irrelevant.

    “4” Employment Contract of It only establishes the fact that Ms.


    Ms. Margaret Pagsamo Pagsamo is the head housekeeper
    with whom trust and confidence
    were reposed in her by the plaintiff,
    but it does substantiate the claim of
    the accused that she did not commit
    the alleged crime with grave abuse
    of confidence against her employers
    “5” Judicial Affidavit of Mr. The prosecution admits only the
    Garde E. Nero existence of the exhibit but objects
    to the purpose for which it was
    offered for being misleading.

    In Mr. Hermita’s judicial affidavit,


    he recounts that the accused
    borrowed his tools the night before
    the incident and that the accused
    would use the tools to fix her room.
    This contrasts with Mr. Nero’s
    statement that he borrowed the
    tools in the morning of August 22 nd
    for his own use.

    With these contradictory


    statements, it does not disprove the
    claim that the accused used the
    tools to commit the crime alleged.

    WHEREFORE, premises considered, it is most respectfully prayed of this


    Honorable Court that the foregoing comment to the exhibits offered by the
    defense be considered in resolving the Defense’s Formal Offer of Evidence.
    Respectfully submitted this th
    day of 2019 at.

    By:

    Copy furnished: (by personal service)

    Assistant Provincial Prosecutor


    OFFICE OF THE PROVINCIAL PROSECUTOR

    You might also like