Diagnosis and Management of Katigatavata (Low Back Pain) in Ayurveda: A Critical Review
Diagnosis and Management of Katigatavata (Low Back Pain) in Ayurveda: A Critical Review
Diagnosis and Management of Katigatavata (Low Back Pain) in Ayurveda: A Critical Review
10(12), 964-970
Article DOI:10.21474/IJAR01/15929
DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/15929
RESEARCH ARTICLE
DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT OF KATIGATAVATA (LOW BACK PAIN) IN AYURVEDA: A
CRITICAL REVIEW
The prevalence of LBP in Indian population has been found to vary between 6.2% (in general population) to 92%
(in construction workers). Such large variation can be attributed to the heterogenicity of the population under study
as twenty three out of thirty-one studies reporting prevalence were conducted in different occupational groups.
Variation in obtained data may be another objective of study, various demographic characteristics of subjects in
study and definition may be used for the study. 2
In Ayurveda it can be correlated with KatigataVata. Some ancient texts also describe few disorders having
resemblance such as KatiGraha, TrikaGraha, PrushthaGraha, KatiVayu, TrikaShoola, PrushthaShoola,
VatajaShoola, TrikaVedana, and Gridhrasi3. Description of KatigataVata is not given separately as much as and not
included in NanatmakaBheda of Vata. In this entity Vata dosha vitiated due to various causes, as mentioned in
CharakaSamhita under the term “SandhigataAnila”, here Vata gets located in the KatiSandhi and result in
KatiSandhigataVata. MadhavNidana also describes as a Hantisandhigata: sandhinshoolatopokarotich which means
this diseases joints damaged by Vata are having symptoms like pain sensation, crepitation in joints.
This problem apparently has a favorable natural history, although it can be remarkably disabling, and has challenged
the health care providers. The medical system frequently fails to identify this complaint beforehand and therefore
leads to a disproportionate quantum of medical and economic expenses 4.
In allopathy, this is treated by Analgesics, Anti-inflammatory agents, Corticosteroids, Muscle relaxants, Calcium
and Vitamin D supplements, Lumbar Belt, Traction, and Physiotherapy to offer. But these medicines have egregious
side goods which limit their use for a long period. Further, progressive worsening of symptoms may affect in
Lumbar conduit Stenosis, which needs surgical intervention like Hemi facetectomy, Laminectomy Slice excision,
etc. with due threat.5
This outcome generates an opportunity for Ayurveda to manage it with conservative treatment, therapies or
interventions which are cost-effective, day-care procedure, easy to perform along with its low economical expense
and having less side effects.
Definition
Charakamentioned that when vitiated Vataget localized inSandhiand produce sign and symptoms like
Sandhishool(pain in joint), Vataapurnadrutisparsh, Sotha (swelling), PrasaranaakunchanyopravartischVedna(pain
on movement of joint)6
Nidana
SamanyaNidana–
Nidanafor SandhigataVata is not given individually butNidanaofVataVyadhiis considered asNidanafor
SandhigataVata
VishesaNidana7:
Special causative factors are as shown in Table 1
965
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 10(12), 964-970
In addition to above Charaka also mentioned Nidana as Dhatukshaya, Abighatat and Marmaghata as a Nidana for
VataVyadhi
AcharyaSushruta also mentioned some VyadhijaHetu as cause of Katishool or Katigraha-
1. PurvarupaofBhagandara- “Katikapaal Vedna “
2. LakshanaofVankshan-” Vidradhi -Katiprusthgrahstivro”
3. PurvarupaofVridhi- “VastikatimushakmedresuVedna”
4. AsanprasavaLakshana – “KatiprusthamPratiSamantadvedna”
SAMPRAPTI8
Vata Prakopaka Nidana Atisevana
Vata Prokopa
Roksya,ParushayaandKharaGunaVridhiatSrotas
Dhatu khsaya
Purvarupa-
No specific description is available for Kati-SandhigataVaita but Purvarupa of VataVyadhi can be considered as
Purvarupa of SandhiGata Vata which is also given as” AvyaktanamLakshana”10.
Roopa/Lakshana–
Clinical signs and symptoms as per different Ayurvedic literature is mentioned in Table 3
966
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 10(12), 964-970
2 Shotha + + + + - + +
3 Prasarana Akunchanyo + - + + - - -
Pravartisch Vedna
4 Hantisandhi - + - - + + +
5 Shoola - + - - + + +
6 Atopa - - - - + - -
*C.S.- Charaka Samhita, S.S- Sushruta Samhita, A.H. Ashtanga Hridayam, A.S.- Ashtanga Samgraha, M.N.-
Madanapala Nighantu, B.P.- Bhavaprakasha, Y.R.- Yogaratnakara
Sadhyata-Asadhyata-
If SandhigataVata is occurs newly, having strong immunity not making any complication than it is Sadhya.
Otherwise, it is KrichhaSadhya. More over if there is dominance of the VataDosha& patients develop complication
of VataVyadhi then it is Yapya11
SandhigataVatais one of the VataVyadhi, therefore it is Kasthasadhyabecause it occurs in aged people and is
situated in Marmasthana, it is MadhyamaRogaMarga, and it is Asthi, and Majja Dhatu Ashrita12
Chikitsa –
Aim of all the treatment modalities described in Ayurveda is to control the Vatadosha and increase the
ShleshakaKaph in Kati Sandhi to its proper functioning with suppression of other associated symptoms. Various
aspects of treatment are mentioned for SandhigataVata according to various classics which are listed below
AcharyaSushruta had given a variety of modalities such as when VataDosh situated in Snayu and Sandhi can be
managed by Snehana, Upanaha, Agnikarma, Bandhan and Mardanakarma13 and aggravated Vatalocalized in whole
body then Siravedha should be done and if it is localized in one place then ShringaYantra can be used to manage
it 14.Use of Kshaum, Karpas, or Karnika made bandage is used tie at various part of body where there is Shoola and
Stambha15.
Yogaratnakara also supported the protocol of Shusruta to some extent, in which treatment is given as, Agnikarma,
Snehana, SwedanforSandhigataVata.
Bhavaprakash mentioned Dahana, Snehana, Upanaha as a therapeutic modality along with this he also mentioned
use of Indervarunimool and Pippali in KarshaMatra with honey. 19Other various treatment modalities by different
classics of Ayurveda are mentioned in Table 4.
967
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 10(12), 964-970
Pathya-Apathya
Use of Sarpi, Tail, Vasa, Majja, Abhyanga, Basti, Snehana, Swedana, useofNivatasthan, Pravarana, Mansa Rasa,
Kshira, Madhur -Amala- Lavana Rasa, Bhojana and Bhranhana Dravya intake.20
Etio-Pathogenesis
The high prevalence of contemporaneous degenerative changes to the intervertebral disk, vertebral body,
and associated joints suggestsa progressive anddynamic medium, with
interdependent changes being secondary to disk space narrowing. Intervertebral disks are believed to undergo First”
Degenerative cascade” of three overlapping phases that may occur over the course of decades.
Narrowed Intervertebral canal‟s dimensions get approximated by adjacent pedicles. Due to rebounding of
longitudinal ligaments, laxity allows bulging of ligamentum flavum and spine instability potential. Increased spine
movement permits subluxation of the superior articular process (SAP), causing a narrowed anteroposterior
dimension of the intervertebral and upper nerve root canals. Laxity may also translate into altered weight
mechanisms and pressure relationships on vertebral bone and joint spaces believed to influence osteophyte
formation and facet hypertrophy to both inferior and superior articular processes with risks for projection into the
intervertebral canal and central canal, respectively. Oblique orientations of the articular processes may further cause
retro-spondylolisthesis, with resulting anterior encroachment of the spinal canal, nerve root canal,and intervertebral
canal22
Clinical Features
Symptoms begin as low backache, initially worst during activity, but later present almost all the time. There may be
a feeling of „a catch‟ while getting up from a sitting position, which improves as one walks a few steps. Pain may
radiate down the limb up to the calf (sciatica) because of irritation of one of the nerve roots. There may be
complaints of transient numbness and paraesthesia in the dermatome of a nerve root, commonly on thelateral side of
leg or foot (L5, S1roots) respectively23
Treatment
It is a degenerative condition so it cannot be prevented to further progression but there are several majors to pain
relief and stiffness reduction to some extent.
Conservative
1. NSAIDs like ibuprofen, diclofenac, ketorolac etc.
2. Opiates intake- Codeine, oxymorphone etc.
3. Muscle relaxants – Serretopeptidase and tranquilizers like Tricyclic antidepressants
968
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 10(12), 964-970
Discussion:-
KatisandhigataVata is not described in detail but Panchnidana of VataVyadhi is well explained in ayurvedaclassics
in which Nidana include the VataProkopaAharaja, Viharaja, MansikaHetu. Its disease of Vriddhaavastha in which
there is pre-dominance of Vatadosha which further increase its prevalence. And Sandhi is a union of Asthi which is
Ashrya of Vata dosh so as its vitiation progress, its RukshaGuna also increases which lead to Dhatukshaya and
Snehansh reduction So Asthi and Sandhi related Vikaras also show progression.
SampraptiChakra and sign and symptoms also suggest that Shotha, Shoola,
PrasaranaAkunchanyoPravartischVedna and Stambha of KatiSandhi which are very similar to degenerative
disorders of modern science.
To treat SandhigataVata all the classics aims to manage the VataDosh and to again increase the Snehans in Asthi-
Sandhi. and as a favor to this from above we can say that all the classics mentioned the use of Snehana and
UpanahaKarma which will control RukshaGuna of Vatadosha. Agnikarma also has a UshanaGuna property which
will control Vatadosha and KaphaDosha both. Rest of modalities like Bandhankarma, Shringayantra based
Raktamokshana and AushadhaKarma also aim for the same.
Conclusion:-
KatisandhigataVata is a very peculiar entity to manage with modern treatments available but remedies mentioned in
Ayurveda classics may boost up the options to manage it with less efforts, maximum benefits, and least side effects.
References:-
1
Supreet Bindra1, Sinha A.G.K., Benjamin A. Epidemiology of Low Back Pain in Indian Population: A Review,
International Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Sciences; 5 (1); 2015. 166-176
2
Supreet Bindra1, Sinha A.G.K., Benjamin A. Epidemiology of Low Back Pain in Indian Population: A Review,
International Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Sciences; 5 (1); 2015. 166-176
3
Dwivedi Amarprakash, Pathrikar Anaya. Management of „Katigata Vata‟ w.s.r. to Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
AYUSHDHARA, 2017;4(4):1224-1229
4
Sanjay Gupta, Radheshyam Sharma. Comparative clinical study of Kati Basti, Patra Pinda Sveda and Matra Basti in
Kati Shoola (low backache), Journal of Ayurveda and Holistic Medicine (JAHM); 3(6); 2015: 19-35.
5
Ukhalkar VP, Effect of Mashadi Tailam Anuvasanbasti in management of Kati Vata with special reference to
Lumbar spondylosis, Int. j. Res. Ayurveda Pharm. 2013, 4(3): 410-413.
6
Shastri K Pt., Chaturvedi G, editors. Charaka Samhita of Agnivesha, Vidyotani Hindi Commentary Chikitsa
Sthana.Ch. 28, Ver. 37. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthan; 2015. p. 783.
7
Shastri K Pt., Chaturvedi G, editors. Charaka Samhita of Agnivesha Vidyotani Hindi Commentary, Vidyotani Hindi
Commentary Chikitsa Sthana. Ch. 28, Ver. 15-18. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthan; 2015. p. 779
8
Kaviraj Gupta Atrideva Ashtang Hridayam of Vagbhata Nidana sthana, Vata Vyadhi Nidana 5, verse Varanasi:
Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthan; 2017 5-6 p374
9
Neha Navalchand Jain et al: A Short Review on Sandhigata Vata W.S.R. To Osteoarthritis. International Ayurvedic
Medical Journal {online} 2018 {cited September, 2018}
10
Shastri K Pt., Chaturvedi G, editors. Charaka Samhita of Agnivesha, Vidyotani Hindi Commentary Chikitsa
Sthana.Ch. 28, Ver. 19. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthan; 2015. p. 780
11
Shastri K Pt., Chaturvedi G, editors. Charaka Samhita of Agnivesha, Vidyotani Hindi Commentary Chikitsa
Sthana. Ch. 28, Ver. 74. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthan; 2015. p.790
12
Shastri K Pt., Chaturvedi G, editors. Charaka Samhita of Agnivesha, Vidyotani Hindi Commentary Sutra Sthana.
Ch. 11, Ver. 48. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthan; 2014. p. 573
13
Shastri Ambikadatt, editor. Sushruta Samhita of Sushruta, Chikitsa Sthana. Ch. 4, Ver. 8. Varanasi: Chaukhambha
SanskritSansthan; 2015. p. 34
14
Shastri Ambikadatt, editor. Sushruta Samhita of Sushruta, Chikitsa Sthana. Ch. 4, Ver.11. Varanasi: Chaukhambha
SanskritSansthan; 2015. p. 34
969
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 10(12), 964-970
15
Shastri Ambikadatt, editor. Sushruta Samhita of Sushruta, Chikitsa Sthana. Ch. 4, Ver. 16-17. Varanasi:
Chaukhambha SanskritSansthan; 2015. p. 34
16
Shastri K Pt., Chaturvedi G, editors. Charaka Samhita of Agnivesha, Vidyotani Hindi Commentary Chikitsa
Sthana. Ch. 28, Ver. 93. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthan; 2015. p.793
17
Shastri K Pt., Chaturvedi G, editors. Charaka Samhita of Agnivesha, Vidyotani Hindi Commentary Sutra Sthana.
Ch. 28, Ver. 27. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthan; 2014. p. 573
18
Kaviraj Gupta Atrideva Ashtang Hridayam of Vagbhata Chikitsa sthana, Vata Vyadhi Chikitsa 21, verse 22
Varanasi: Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthan; 2017 5-6 p 568
19
Shri Hariprasad Panday editor Bhav Prakash Dwitiya bhag VidyotaniHindi commentary Chikitsa prakarn
Adhikara 24 verse 259 p.271
20
Shastri K Pt., Chaturvedi G, editors. Charaka Samhita of Agnivesha, Vidyotani Hindi Commentary Chikitsa
Sthana. Ch. 28, Ver. 104-105. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthan; 2015. p.796
21
Joshi F, Mahanta V, Dudhamal TS, Gupta SK. Effect of Agnikarma (therapeutic heat burns) and Raktamokshana
(therapeutic bloodletting) in the management of Kati Sandhigata Vata (lumbar spondylosis). Ayu 2019; 40:79-88.
22
Middleton, K., Fish, D.E. Lumbar spondylosis: clinical presentation and treatment approaches. Curr Rev
Musculoskeletal Med 2, 94–104 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-009-9051-x
23
J. Maheshwari Essential Orthopaedics Fifth Edition 2015 Degenerative disorders chap 13 p.298.
970