Chapter 8: Global City
Chapter 8: Global City
Chapter 8: Global City
Introduction:
“Medium and small cities, those which nobody knows about, are
going to grow faster in the future. Our century is about global
cities.”
- The Mayor of Istabul
Learning Objectives:
Discussion:
1|Pag e
locales (cities) according to a hierarchy of importance to the operation
of global system of finance and trade.
Saskia Sassen is the leading urban theorist of the global world. Her
work, The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo (1991) has shaped
the concepts and methods that other theorists have used to analyze
the role of cities and their networks in the contemporary world.
2|Pag e
Essential Traits of a Global City
3|Pag e
and commercial hubs of the Information age. With high levels
of information exchange, these cities are often located in
countries with some of the most stable governments fund
seed accelerators or have grants that attract the attention of
multinational companies seeking to tap into and grow the
ecosystem. Tel Aviv, for example, has one of the highest start-
up densities in the world with a strong entrepreneurial spirit
and 300 multinational R&D centers. Berlin, too, is a growing
regional hub, welcoming start-ups from London and Paris
that seek the city’s lower costs, openness to other
nationalities, and legacy of creativity. Finally, Bangalore has
become a center for young tech workers in India, with
entrepreneurial success stories in diverse industries from e-
commerce to healthcare (Taylor, et.al, 2011).
4|Pag e
8. Centres of media and communications for global networks.
5|Pag e
tourists of global cities also requires services requirements
especially in Tourism and Hotel Industries (Robinson, 2006).
6|Pag e
made these global cities as entertainment and tourism
capitals.
GaWC Study
7|Pag e
2018 CITY CLASSIFICATION
2. Beta - Beta level cities are cities that link moderate economic
regions to the world economy and are classified in three sections,
Beta +, Beta, and Beta − cities.
ALPHA
3. Alpha
Bangkok, Brussels, Buenos Aires, Chicago, Frankfurt,
Guangzhou, Istanbul, Jakarta, Kuala Lumpur, Los
Angeles, Madrid, Melbourne, Mexico City, Miami, Milan,
Moscow, Mumbai, São Paulo, Seoul, Taipei, Toronto,
Warsaw, Zürich
4. Alpha
Amsterdam, Barcelona, Bogotá, Budapest, Dublin,
Houston, Johannesburg, Lisbon, Luxembourg City, Manila,
Montreal, Munich, New Delhi, Prague, Riyadh, Rome, San
8|Pag e
Francisco, Santiago, Shenzhen, Stockholm, Vienna,
Washington, D.C.
BETA
1. Beta +
Athens, Atlanta, Auckland, Bangalore, Boston, Bucharest,
Cairo, Chengdu, Copenhagen, Dallas, Doha, Düsseldorf,
Hamburg, Hangzhou, Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City, Lima,
Perth, Tel Aviv, Vancouver
2. Beta
Abu Dhabi, Beirut, Berlin, Brisbane, Calgary, Cape Town,
Caracas, Casablanca, Chennai, Denver, Karachi, Kiev,
Kuwait City, Lagos, Manama, Minneapolis, Montevideo,
Nairobi, Nanjing, Oslo, Philadelphia, Rio de Janeiro, Sofia,
Tianjin, Wuhan, Zagreb
3. Beta
Almaty, Antwerp, Belgrade, Birmingham, Bratislava,
Changsha, Chongqing, Dalian, Dhaka, Edinburgh, Geneva,
George Town, Helsinki, Jeddah, Jinan, Kampala, Lyon,
Manchester, Monterrey, Nicosia, Panama City, Port Louis,
Qingdao, Quito, San José, San Juan, San Salvador,
Seattle, Shenyang, Stuttgart. Suzhou, Tunis, Valencia,
Xiamen
GAMMA
1. Gamma +
Accra, Adelaide, Cleveland, Colombo, Dar es Salaam,
Detroit, Glasgow, Guatemala City, Guayaquil, Harare,
Hyderabad, Lahore, Muscat, Osaka, Pune, Riga,
Rotterdam, Xi'an, Zhengzhou
2. Gamma
Ahmedabad, Algiers, Amman, Ankara, Asunción, Austin,
Baku, Baltimore, Belfast, Bilbao, Bristol, Charlotte,
Guadalajara, Hefei, Islamabad, Kolkata, Kunming, La Paz,
Ljubljana, Luanda, Lusaka, Phoenix, Porto, Saint
9|Pag e
Petersburg, San Diego, San Jose, Santo Domingo, St.
Louis, Taiyuan, Tallinn, Tampa, Tbilisi, Tegucigalpa, Turin,
Vilnius, Wellington
3. Gamma
Belo Horizonte, Cologne, Curitiba, Durban, Fuzhou, Johor
Bahru, Maputo, Medellín, Milwaukee, Minsk, Nantes,
Nashville, Orlando, Ottawa, Penang, Phnom Penh, Poznań,
Sacramento, San Antonio, Tirana, Wrocław, Yangon
SUFFICIENCY
1. High Sufficiency
Abidjan, Abuja, Dakar, Douala, Edmonton, Florence,
Gaborone, Hartford, İzmir, Kansas City, Kaohsiung,
Labuan, Las Vegas, Lausanne, Leeds, Managua, Nassau,
Ningbo, Porto Alegre, Querétaro, Raleigh, Skopje,
Southampton, Surabaya
2. Sufficiency
Aarhus, Aberdeen, Aguascalientes, Alexandria*,
Antananarivo, Baghdad*, Bandar Seri Begawan*,
Barranquilla*, Basel, Bergen, Birmingham, Blantyre,
Bologna, Bordeaux, Brasília, Bremen, Buffalo*, Bursa,
Cali, Campinas, Canberra, Cardiff, Cebu City, Changchun,
Chișinău, Christchurch, Cincinnati, Ciudad Juárez,
Columbus, Córdoba, Dammam, Des Moines, Dortmund,
Dresden, Dushanbe*, Fukuoka, Genoa, Goiânia,
Gothenburg, Graz, Grenoble, Guiyang*, The Hague,
Haikou*, Halifax, Hamilton, Hanover, Harbin, Hohhot*,
Indianapolis, Jacksonville, Jerusalem, Kabul,
Kathmandu*, Katowice, Kazan*, Kigali, Kingston,
Kinshasa*, Kochi, Kraków, Lanzhou*, Leicester, Leipzig,
León, Libreville, Liège, Lille, Limassol, Linz, Liverpool, Łódź,
Louisville, Macau, Madison, Málaga, Malmö, Marseille,
Memphis, Mérida, Mexicali, Montpellier, Nagoya,
Nanchang*, Nanning, Nantong*, Naples, New Orleans,
Newcastle upon Tyne, Nice, Nottingham*, Novosibirsk*,
Nuremberg, Nur-Sultan*, Oklahoma City, Palo Alto,
Pittsburgh, Podgorica, Port Elizabeth, Port Harcourt*, Port
of Spain, Portland, Pretoria, Puebla, Quebec City, Recife,
10 | P a g e
Reykjavík, Richmond, Rochester*, Rosario, Salt Lake City,
San Luis Potosí*, San Pedro Sula, Sanaʽa, Santa Cruz de la
Sierra, Sarajevo, Seville, Shijiazhuang*, Strasbourg,
Taichung, Tashkent, Tijuana, Toulouse, Trieste*, Tulsa,
Ulaanbaatar, Ürümqi, Utrecht, Valencia, Valparaíso,
Vientiane*, Weifang*, Windhoek, Winnipeg, Wuxi*, Xining*,
Yerevan, Zhuhai*
The GCI analyzes 128 Cities in Six World Regions. The Global
Cities Index examines the current performance of cities based on 27
metrics spanning five dimensions: business activity, human capital,
information exchange, cultural experience, and political engagement.
The Index provides insights into the global reach, performance, and
level of development of the world’s largest cities. It also allows for the
comparison of diverse cities and the identification of core strengths
and distinctive differences.
11 | P a g e
3. Those specialized service firms engaged tin the most complex
and globalized markets are subject to agglomeration economies.
12 | P a g e
border seamlessly. While globalization has blurred the distinction
between countries, the flow of economic resources, such as human
capital and financial capital, has become easier than ever before. In
effect, globalization redefines the relationships between economic
production and territoriality, social processes and institutions. This
borderless realm has also contributed to the rise of migration into
global cities. The contention is held that without the contribution by
international migrants, a person who moves from one place to another
to see a better living (Anderson, 2015), global cities might not be as
impactful as they are in the development of the global economy. Global
cities are attractive to firms due to the possibility of being able to tap a
diverse pool of highly skilled labor, including the expatriate (Brenner,
1998).
To what extent has the development of the Global City affected
migration?
According to Sassen (1991), the geography of globalization consists
both a dynamic dispersal and centralization. With globalization, the
increasing spatial dispersal of economic activities at metropolitan,
national, and global level has contributed to the need of a new
territorial centralization of top-level management and central
corporate functions.
As those central corporate functions, such as human resources,
technology, compliance, are becoming more complex, many large
global firms outsource them to highly specialized firms. To benefit
from agglomeration economies, these transnational companies would
operate in global cities, where they are closely clustered with
specialized service firms. In urban economics, firms can achieve
economies of scales and network effects when agglomerating with each
other; with more firms of related business engage in the clustering of
economic activity, cost of production decreases, hence increasing
returns to scale (Glaeser, 2011).
As such, both the large global firm and the specialized service
firm could benefit in operating closely in global cities. When those
specialized firms provided global services, their global network is
strengthened. In the long run, this business practice would positively
impact the global economy, since people’s employment is secured, and
at the same time, both firms who engage in the international trade in
services would be benefited. Therefore, it is clear that global cities are
central to the development of the global economy in general and
employment – oriented migration in particular (Alderson, et. al (2010).
Nowadays, many large corporations invest substantially in
corporate technology to streamline their business. As such,
13 | P a g e
technology-consulting companies, such as Accenture, IBM, receive
plenty of business opportunities (Taylor, 2004).
Other than outsourcing, many TNCs choose to near-shore or
offshore their central corporate functions to save cost and most
importantly, avoid the risk of customer’s data leak. A new-shoring
example would be Deutsche Bank and Morgan Stanley operating in
Birmingham and Glasgow respectively, where their technology and
compliance centers are located due to the lower operating cost,
compared to that of London, the global city. Additionally, many
financial institutions offshore their technology function to Bangalore –
Silicon Valley of India. While off shoring can benefit the global
economy, as it provides job security for employees in the offshore-
offices, over-reliance on certain type of services i.e. technology would
hinder the long-term development of a country. It could be argued that
such pigeonholding is a form of division of labor and economies of
scale, through which employees can do what they do best, and at the
same time, the employers can operate at a better cost-level. Equally
importantly, the off shoring business could provide a better standard
of living for people in the developing countries like India; nevertheless,
this may lead to wealth inequality between the offshore city and the
rest of the country, for instance, 39.93% of people in Chhatisgarh are
living below poverty line, which is almost double than that of
Karnataka (the state of Bangalore) with 29.91% (Reserve Bank of
India, 2014).
14 | P a g e
some cost savings over onshore and has the added benefit
of proximity for more frequent site visits, while retaining a
highly skilled labor pool.
15 | P a g e
‘diversity ratio’, many of the recruited international migrants are based
on non-client facing roles like the middle or back office in investment
banks (Lam, 2016). In effect, the argument holds that since the
opportunities are present and well defined in most global cities, the
tendency for migration to increase in these areas over time is also very
apparent and most likely to happen.
16 | P a g e
Investing in Public Transport
Banning cars may mitigate the traffic conditions but is not at all
an effective solution. One consideration is by investing on Public
railways (Brenner, 1998). Most alpha cities possess a very elaborate
yet so effective mass transport system. One has to look into the MTR
of Hongkong or the MRT of Taiwan and the generalization could be
made how an efficient mass train system can effectively lessen road
traffic. The city of Riyadh in Saudi Arabia is a good example of the
tremendous efforts that are being made in this area. Riyadh, which
has five million inhabitants and is still rapidly growing, is now
planning the world’s biggest subway project, which will be 175
kilometers long (Lam, 2016).
Multilateral agencies have put forward the improvement of
public infrastructure as a long-term solution to traffic congestion. The
study echoes this, pointing out that billion in rail infrastructure by
2022. The Philippine government is trying to address the poor
infrastructure situation with its Build, Build, Build campaign, which
seeks to raise public spending on infrastructure from 5.3% of the
gross domestic product (GDP) this year to 7.4% by 2022 in which a big
chunk will be funneled down towards improving the mass transport
system.
References:
Abelos, A.V., et. al. (2018). The Contemporary World. Chapter 10: The
Global Cities pp. 166-174. Mutya Publishing House, Inc.
Jim Iyoob. (June 27, 2012). “Onshore, Offshore, or Near Shore What
is the Difference?” Retrieved from
https://www.etechgs.com/onshore-offshore-near-shore-difference/
18 | P a g e