Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Xiiiiiiiiy 8R+L+-Trk+0 7Zpp+-Zppvlp0 6-+-Zp-Snp+0 5Wq-+-+-+-0 4-+P+P+-+0 3+-Sn-Vlp+-0 2Pzp-Wq-+Pzp0 1Tr-+-Mkl+R0 Xabcdefghy

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

(The annotations to this game, by R. D. Kholmov, are from '64' (№ 42, 1971).

The translation
from the original Russian is by Douglas Griffin.)

Petrosian – Fischer
4 match-game, Candidates’ Final, Buenos Aires, 12th October 1971
th

1.c4 c5 2.Nf3
More natural seems 2.Nc3, but after this continuation Black rapidly establishes control over d4
and obtains a comfortable game. For example, after 2...g6 3.Nf3 Bg7 4.d4 cxd4 5.Nxd4 Nc6 the
knight has to spend a tempo on withdrawal, or White has to reconcile himself to 6.e3, which does
not promise him much. After the quieter continuation 2...g6 3.g3 Bg7 4.Bg2 Nc6 5.Nf3 e6 6.0–0
Nge7 followed by ...d7–d5 Black satisfactorily solves the problem of the opening.

2...g6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nc6 5.e4


Seemingly, the occupation of the centre should secure White an advantage, but in recent times
with the efforts of theoreticians, many reliable ways to neutralise this advantage have been found for
Black.

5...Nf6 6.Nc3 d6
Fischer chose the same order of moves in the 2nd game of his match with Larsen.

7.f3
In this position Larsen played 7.Be2 and later there unexpectedly arose difficulties for White on
account of the fact that the e4–pawn proved to be insufficiently defended. This was a consequence
of the excessively sharp attack by Larsen, f2–f4–f5. Petrosian, however, likes to post the pieces
more reliably and securely.

7...Nxd4 8.Qxd4 Bg7 9.Be3 0–0 10.Qd2 Qa5


XIIIIIIIIY
8r+l+-trk+0
7zpp+-zppvlp0
6-+-zp-snp+0
5wq-+-+-+-0
4-+P+P+-+0
3+-sN-vLP+-0
2PzP-wQ-+PzP0
1tR-+-mKL+R0
xabcdefghy
All of this has already occurred many times in the practice of modern chessplayers. Seemingly,
White has good prospects due to his predominance in the centre. However, Black has the
possibility of creating counter-play of his own.

11.Rc1 Be6 12.b3


After 12.Nd5 Qxd2+ 13.Kxd2 Bxd5 14.cxd5 White has a definite advantage. But the latest
studies of the theoreticians have shown that with 12...Qxa2! 13.Nxe7+ Kh8 14.Be2 Ng8! 15.Nxg8
Kxg8 16.Bd4 Bxd4 17.Qxd4 Qa5+ 18.Kf2 Qe5! Black has everything in order.

12...Rfc8 13.Be2 a6 14.Nd5


It was considered that White obtains an advantage after 14.0–0. However, after 14...b5!
15.Nb1! b4! he has nothing. The black knight transfers via d7 to c5 with a good game. In the
case of 16.a3 Rab8 17.Qe1 Nd7 White does not have time to play 18.Bd2 on account of the check
at b6. However, to move the king away - 18.Kh1 - is too late, since Black establishes the knight at
c5 in good time, with an attack on b3.

14...Qxd2+ 15.Kxd2
Now the game forcibly transposes into a completely level ending.

15...Nxd5 16.cxd5
Possibly, a more interesting struggle would have arisen after 16.exd5, but then too one can hardly
speak of any sort of advantage for White.

16...Bd7 17.Rxc8+ Rxc8 18.Rc1 Rxc1 19.Kxc1 Kf8 20.Kc2 e6


XIIIIIIIIY
8-+-+-mk-+0
7+p+l+pvlp0
6p+-zpp+p+0
5+-+P+-+-0
4-+-+P+-+0
3+P+-vLP+-0
2P+K+L+PzP0
1+-+-+-+-0
xabcdefghy
On the suggestion of T. Petrosian - agreed drawn. In the 3rd game of the second
Spassky-Petrosian match a further 20 moves were played, but without a decisive result. Neither
player managed to demonstrate an advantage.

You might also like