4.4.3 Talent and Knowledge Management
4.4.3 Talent and Knowledge Management
4.4.3 Talent and Knowledge Management
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
OBJECTIVES
- To impart the knowledge on talent and knowledge management.
its importance in contemporary business
OUTCOMES
- By the end of this course, a student would learn the new concepts
in talent and knowledge management and its relevance in the
corporate
2
MODULE 2 : 12 HOURS
Elements, benefits and challenges of Talent Management System -
Building blocks of talent management: competencies, performance
management, evaluating employee potential - Modern practices in
talent attraction, selection, retention and engagement. Talent
management & Social Media - Emerging Trends in Talent
Management
3
MODULE 3: 10 HOURS
Talent Planning – Succession management process - Cross
functional capabilities and fusion of talents - Talent development
budget - Value driven cost structure - Contingency plan for talent -
Building talent - Leadership coaching
4
MODULE 4: 6 HOURS
Return on talent (ROT) - ROT measurements - Optimizing investment
in talent - Integrating compensation with talent management -
Developing talent management information system - Psychometrics
for TM
5
MODULE 5: 12 HOURS
Knowledge economy - Understanding Knowledge management -
Types of knowledge - Knowledge centric organizations - Knowledge
management framework - Knowledge creation and capture -
Designing of Knowledge management strategy - Issues and
challenges in knowledge Management - Implementing knowledge
management strategy - Knowledge management metrics and audit.
6
MODULE 6: 8 HOURS
Conduct Interviews with five senior executives of two organisations
on their talent and knowledge management practices. Conduct
minimum one focus group discussion (FGD) on Knowledge
management Portal
5. PEDAGOGY
- Lectures
- Seminars and presentation
- Practical Exercises like industry and field visit – Individual and
Group
- Case Study discussion in each module 6. TEACHING/LEARNING
RESOURCES
ESSENTIAL READINGS
1. Berger, Lance A and Dorothy Berger (Eds.) The Talent
Management Handbook,
Tata McGraw Hill, New Delhi
2. Chowdhary, Subir, The Talent Era, Financial Times/Prentice Hall
International
3. Chowdhary, Subir, Organization 2IC, Pearson Education, New
Delhi
4. Masood,Anilkumarsingh and SomeshDhamija , Talent
management in Indiachallenges and
opportunities,Atlanticpublisher,New Delhi.
5. Elais M Awad, Hassan M Ghaziri, Knowledge management,:
Pearson
6. Sanjay Mahaopatra, Knowledge Management, Mcmillan
7. Waman s Jawadekar, Knowledge Management text and cases,
Mcgraw Hill
Return On Talent
How Talent
Management Is
Integrated With
Compensation
Planning
When it comes to workplace relationships, communication is the key.
Employers have to ensure that there is an enhanced and optimized
communication system across the organization and staff members can
connect even to them anytime, anywhere. Even a single case of
miscommunication can lead to disruption, decreased employee engagement,
poor performance, and low retention. One of the most common topics that is
often miscommunicated in an enterprise is compensation. It is the foundation
of satisfaction and motivation among employees and a tool for employers to
attract top talent and retain them. However, employers and employees are
never on the same page when we talk about compensation.
Contents hide
1 Integrated Talent Management System
2 Benefits of Talent Management Solution
3 Compensation Management: A Key Tool for Talent Management
4 Best Practices to Integrate Talent Management with Compensation Planning
4.1 Build a Pay-for-Performance Strategy
4.2 Incorporate Work-Life Balance
4.3 Improved Experience & Communication
Work performance
Responsibilities
Job market
Position
Experience
Company budget
However, this method can fail drastically if managers are not trained well as
they are often uncomfortable assessing others’ performance and speaking
openly about issues related to it. They also lack the expertise and skills
required for constructive feedback and goal setting, two components that are
significant for a successful pay-for-performance program. Also, ensure that
your strategies are combined with applicable data as people want proof and
relevant information attached can assist you in the whole process. Your plan
should fulfill three criteria:
Conclusion
Most of you may think that why go through all this trouble when you can
simply opt for the ‘talk about pay’ approach and get done with it. Just think
about it again. Can you maintain complete transparency and keep away from
all misperceptions by simply talking? No. By integrating talent management
and compensation planning, you can rely on clear communication, accurate
job description, and fair compensation. Employees will understand their true
value, get all the information instantly, and feel confident about being paid
fairly.
Discover:
Talent management in HR
You need to have a talent management strategy in place designed just for your
company to gain optimal results.
With top specialists in your organization, you can reach any goal.
Talent management is most effective of all when it combines three key
components: rapid talent allocation, positive employee experience, and a
strategic HR team.
3. It drives innovation
New technologies are always hitting the scene, whatever your industry.
Talented employees are able to find ways to harness the capabilities of new
tools and solve problems or come up with original ideas.
The appropriate talent management strategy will allow you to form a more
productive team. This is far more useful than just having a bunch of creative
and talented people in your organization.
5. It decreases turnover
When employees feel valued at a company, when they know they will have
plenty of opportunities to grow in the business, they are less likely to seek work
elsewhere.
Having inspiring talent on your team will motivate other employees and help
them grow.
However you choose to develop your model, it must include the following.
1. Planning
Planning aligns your talent management model in line with the overall goals of
your organization.
Only with the correct planning can you ensure that you seek talent with the right
skills and experience. In addition, it assesses current employees to see what is
working well for the company.
For instance, your needs may change or employees may take on new
responsibilities. Talent management ensures that you always have sufficient
staff to carry out all your operations and prevent heavy workloads that could
cause demotivation.
The right strategy will attract just the kind of workers you want at your
business. Such hires will be driven, skilled, and seeking to advance within the
company.
Even if you choose not to hire someone for a particular position, you still need
to create a positive experience. This will give you the opportunity to hire these
candidates for other jobs or use them as ambassadors to acquire other talent.
3. Developing
The development part of the model involves taking steps to help talent grow
within the company.
Talent management also looks at what will keep employees at your company
enthusiastic and willing to go the extra mile. It is necessary to provide
employees with value.
Motivation also requires the correct onboarding — to give new hires a great
impression of your company from the very beginning. This will increase the
chance that they stay with the company and work hard.
4. Retaining
Another purpose of talent management is to keep people at your company for
longer.
Through training and other types of engagement, employees have the chance to
create a career without leaving the company. You may achieve this by focusing
on compensation (monetary and otherwise) as well as company culture.
5. Transitioning
After hiring and developing their skills, you need to plan for employees’
transitions.
Your aim at this stage is to keep their knowledge within the company — this is
called knowledge management.
You organize the talent management process based on the talent management
strategy.
There are few different types strategies you can choose from.
It’s expensive, and will cost you even more if you end up needing
to hire someone else.
You can find talent faster. This may be necessary if you are in
urgent need for talent and have insufficient time to search for top
employees.
You can hire two, or even three, promising specialists for the same
amount as for one top performer.
The main disadvantages are:
Your company may grow slower.
The strategy may fail entirely and you’ll need to revert to option 1.
"Your team’s strength is not a function of the talent of individual members. It’s
a function of their collaboration, tenacity, and mutual respect."
Finally, the pros of combining the two above are:
3. Assign Responsibilities
Much of the talent management strategy is down to HR, but other people at
your company will also need to be involved. For instance, C-level executives
are responsible for succession planning.
Now you have an understanding of why you need talent management and what
it involves. Next, you need to take a look at the talent management process itself
and learn how to apply it to your company.
The following steps cover what you need to do to develop a continuous talent
management process for your organization.
It covers how to find the most talented people available and then help them stay
in your company.
Before you can go any further, you must determine what kinds of hires you
need and what requirements they should fill.
Know what tasks you will set them, have training sessions scheduled, and
assign current employees to support new workers settle in.
Step 4: Organize Learning and Development
Remember, it is often easier to develop the skills of your current employees
than to hire new talent.
Plus, even if you do hire top talent, they will likely want to learn something in
their new role.
Plan ways for your workers to learn and grow, such as through conferences,
courses, and a learning management system to create a learning environment.
This could save you hiring new talent and it may help an employee prepare for a
promotion.
Talents Make and Break the Rules; Knowledge Workers Conserve the
Rules
The main difference between talents and knowledge workers is that talents
break the rules, create, initiate, invent, direct, and send—talents take initiative,
they are proactive. Knowledge workers, in general, do not. Knowledge workers
take orders. They are studious and obedient people. Just because a person is
brilliant or has a Ph.D. does not mean that person is talented. One need not be a
genius to be a talent.
Breaking the rules is not necessarily the road to glory and wealth. The dot-
bombs broke all the rules of business leadership. Many had no visible means of
actually making money by offering something for sale. They simply sold their
ideas to people with money who clearly did not use diligence in recognizing
unrealistic business plans. They broke the rules and bombed out at the expense
of many broken lives.
Learning & Development is a great resource for building employee skills, enhancing
their motivation, and contributing to productivity and engagement. It is particularly
invaluable when learning activities are linked to the employees’ developmental
goals identified in the performance management process.
Better the talent a company possesses better the profit it can generate, as humans
are the ones who are responsible for bringing in the revenue.
📄 Contents
␡
1. Organizational Winning Strategy by Leveraging Talent
2. Talents versus Knowledge Workers
3. Talent Management System
4. Challenging Environment
⎙ Print
+ Share This
Talents Make and Break the Rules; Knowledge Workers Conserve the
Rules
The main difference between talents and knowledge workers is that talents break the rules, create, initiate,
invent, direct, and send—talents take initiative, they are proactive. Knowledge workers, in general, do not.
Knowledge workers take orders. They are studious and obedient people. Just because a person is brilliant
or has a Ph.D. does not mean that person is talented. One need not be a genius to be a talent.
In the 1950s, when W. Edwards Deming begged American companies to improve their quality, they didn't
listen. He continued to beg into the 1980s, when corporate America finally listened. Of course, by then
Japan had a 30-year head start, from which the Western world has never recovered. Deming identified
incredible persistence as a key characteristic of talent. His ideas provided a great service to society but
were slow to gain acceptance in the Western world.
Breaking the rules is not necessarily the road to glory and wealth. The dot-bombs broke all the rules of
business leadership. Many had no visible means of actually making money by offering something for sale.
They simply sold their ideas to people with money who clearly did not use diligence in recognizing
unrealistic business plans. They broke the rules and bombed out at the expense of many broken lives.
eople are a fundamental resource for any enterprise. Unless top leadership can
harness this asset, an organization risks being eclipsed in the so-called war for
talent. Executive leadership must be strategic about talent because the most
important levers for extending competitive advantage are all related to people.
The concept of the "value chain," introduced by Michael Porter in 1985, can be
applied to talent in the form of the following "people value chain": talent attraction,
targeted recruiting, high-accuracy hiring, proactive "on-boarding," talent
identification, performance enhancement, career acceleration and succession
management. Leadership that really "gets it" takes a strategic, long-term, patient and
disciplined approach to creating and maximizing the people value chain.
Finding and identifying the "best-fit people" and placing them in the "best-fit roles" is
basic and intuitive, but it is far from simplistic. There are only two tactics that will
deliver on that score: one, having a strategically grounded "culture brand" for
attracting and recruiting the best fits; and two, being able to carry out high-accuracy
hiring.
The foundation of a strategically grounded culture brand requires crystal clarity about
the organization’s reason for being (mission), its idealized future state (vision) and its
fundamental cultural principles (core values). With those in hand, the enterprise can
craft a compelling call to action (a strategy map and blueprint for execution).
High-accuracy hiring involves knowing how to precisely screen in and screen out,
knowing which tools to use to maximize the probabilities that you are accurately
identifying a best fit as a best fit and knowing how to standardize the selection
process and replicate it throughout the organization.
First, analyze your major job categories and identify their crucial competencies.
There is a universe of about 40 competencies, various subsets of which can pinpoint
the requirements for efficacy in most work roles. Second, build a set of tools that can
measure the desired traits and capabilities for a given candidate. These include
a competency model, a behaviorally-based interview protocol and guide, a
personality test that can measure "softer" indicators and an evaluation matrix that
can be used by all members of the hiring team to coordinate and synchronize the
assessment process. Third, methodically prepare hiring teams to gauge the answers
to three questions about every candidate:
Can he/she do this job? (Education, experience and acquired skill sets)
Will he/she do this job? (Vocational interests, motivation, work ethic and drive)
Will he/she fit here? (Values, sociability, independence, team orientation and
leadership/followership styles)
Proactive Onboarding
Key objectives of onboarding coaching include aligning the executive with the
corporate culture, developing the areas that bear closely on job success, facilitating
positive communication and ensuring positive relationships with his or her team and
other stakeholders. The onboarding process in a nutshell:
1. The consultant and new hire evaluate the corporate culture of the
organization, interviewing key personnel and examining the strategic
documents and various materials that highlight the nature of the
organization’s people practices.
2. The consultant assesses the onboarding candidate. The candidate responds
to assessment questionnaires related to emotional intelligence quotient (EQ)
abilities and leadership behavior and participates in an in-depth interview.
3. With these two assessments, cultural and individual, the core of the
onboarding process can begin. The candidate goes through an in-depth
debriefing with the coach to:
The new hire and coach are partners in developing strategies to integrate the
executive into his or her new role, culture and company. Together, they create an
early warning system for identifying emerging problems and initiate the steps
necessary to take the executive’s skill sets to the next level. The process is not very
different from the typical general executive coaching engagement. It simply has a
more specific focus.
Your mission, vision, core values and "strategy execution blueprint" will guide your
talent identification and development system. Once you understand how they
translate into cultural, leadership and talent management requirements, you can
make the case for talent management throughout the organization, align all levels of
management with the requirements and hold them accountable for delivering. That
delivery depends on the accurate use of a powerful weapon: a leadership
competency model that captures the essence of your mission, strategic imperatives
and talent requirements. Acting as a gyroscope, it describes and quantifies the
management and executive profiles you will need in high-value roles in the future.
Any talent management approach must synchronize with the organization’s strategy.
Reverse-engineer your succession management to the organization’s human
resources strategy, which, in turn, is reverse-engineered to the overall business
strategy. Then, turn the organizational culture into a meritocracy where managers
are held accountable, recognized and promoted for being successful talent scouts
and developers. Whether your organization seeks leaders from within or without, it is
always necessary to build them. The reason is leaders, for the most part, are not
born. They are made.
The Challenge
Successful companies know it’s not necessarily core business processes that give
them an edge anymore. Today’s competitive landscape comes down to
management and leadership expertise at all points along the people value chain.
In effect, all employees now can be classified as free agents and all fields of labor as
performing arts—places where field performance (not politics, popularity, personality,
potential, academic degrees, or social pedigrees) matters most, where the value a person adds
on the job is recognized and rewarded, where managers and administrators serve as coaches
and counselors and either become world-class leaders of talented people or lose their jobs.
For the first time at many business schools, M.B.A. graduates are choosing “talent tracks,”
performance fields, and entrepreneurial ventures over management positions in large
organizations, having witnessed the mass exodus of many managers in merged and
downsized companies.
We live in a talent economy. Today’s economy is “ideacentric” and talent driven. Good ideas
give birth to good products. Innovative ideas are driving the economy, creating wealth, and
making people rich. More important, some bold ideas are changing the world for the better.
Providing a climate where people feel free and motivated to cultivate and implement
constructive ideas is the challenge of talented leaders. Those who succeed in selling good
ideas to others win financially, gain power, and assume a leadership role. Indeed, the only
sustainable form of leadership is thought leadership—generating innovative ideas and making
market adjustments faster than the competition. Even though the bubble of instant “dot-com”
billionaires has burst, we have all been struck by the blinding light of the lasting truth: We
live in the age of ideas, and the talented person who generates, implements, and successfully
markets those innovative ideas wins exponentially more money, visibility, and credibility.
What every manager wants from a Talent is value-added contribution. But few managers
know how to achieve this aim. To explain how to achieve this aim, I present in this chapter
the Talent value chain.
The great scientist Albert Einstein said, “Imagination is more powerful than knowledge.”
Many of Einstein’s theories in his later life are based on his own imagination. He never wrote
“proof” of those theories. Scientists are still trying to prove some of them.
Knowledge can be acquired through reading, learning, and doing. But imagination must be
cultivated and applied by each individual Talent. Every innovation starts in someone’s
imagination.
Walt Disney exercised his imagination in creating a fantasy land for kids regardless of
cultural or language differences. If people come to Disneyland from Vietnam, South Africa,
or India, without speaking any English, these people still enjoy Disneyland. By the end of the
day their kids are excited and thankful for so much pleasure. There are no cultural boundaries
or language barriers. That is the phenomenal power of the imagination.
Henry Ford mixed imagination with knowledge. He believed that one day every American
family would own a car. And he had this belief when there were no paved highways.
Bill Gates, similarly, believed that every American family would want and need a personal
computer. “Computers will do micro-surgery within the next 20 years,” he predicts. If
someone cannot imagine this in the first place, how is it going to happen?
Michael Dell can boast that only one company in the world increased its earnings and
revenues at about 80 percent during its first eight years and at 55 percent per year for the next
six years—and that was his company, Dell Computer Corporation. He achieved this by
avoiding “traditional business thinking” and dealing directly with customers.
We are entering the age of excellence, an age with no geographic boundaries. In this age,
every individual, organization, product, and service faces tremendous competition. To
survive and grow, each individual and organization must keep improving. Mediocre work
will not stand the test of time. Mediocre people, products, and organizations will suffer
demise sooner or later. Only high-quality products, services, and strategies will guarantee
survival and success. Where there is tremendous competition, you need to do something
better and different.
CEO Michael Dell notes: “We surround ourselves with the best talent we can find and
structure our business for success, even to the point of dividing up people’s jobs. This has
now become part of our culture. The first time we did it, some people said, ’You’re cutting
my job in half.’ Six months later, because of growth, their job is the same size it was before,
and they say, ’Please cut my job in half again.’ We grow our business by dividing and
conquering different parts of the market, which also helps us acquire new talent.”
1. Anticipation
Anyone who wants to win in the marketplace must anticipate the next wave and learn how
not only to predict the next wave but also to create the next wave. With the intense
competition we have now, people depend more upon innovative ideas—ideas that anticipate
the next wave, start a trend, or at least ride a wave started by someone else.
For example, Michael Dell reports: “We strive to anticipate key trends in our business to gain
a greater share of a faster-growing market. The Internet is one example. We know that
virtually everybody will be buying computers over the Internet in five years. We want to
dominate that market and have a leadership position in sales of computers through this new
distribution channel. We also look aggressively for add-on businesses. We focus on
clearly connected businesses and services that our customers want, such as peripherals in
software, integration services, and financial services.”
2. Articulation
You may have a great idea, but if you can’t articulate it and express it well to others, it will
never see the light of day. Everyone knows of great products that have failed because the
message was not right.
For example, during the past few years, many entrepreneurs failed because they failed to
articulate their vision and mission to themselves or to others. They seemed to focus more on
having a successful IPO than on building a business. They failed to develop and articulate
their plans for success, and they ruthlessly failed their people.
3. Acceptance
After you come up with an idea, you have to make sure that the people who surround the idea
will accept it and embrace it and cherish it. You may have the best idea, but if the people you
depend on are not cherishing it, it is useless. If everyone in your environment embraces and
cherishes the idea, then you can build a successful organization and win customers’ hearts.
For example, when Jeff Bezos started Amazon.com, he made sure that all his people
cherished the idea of selling books over the Internet for the first time. At the beginning, many
people thought, “I’m not going to buy a book without touching it first.” But millions of
people are now doing it because somebody believed in the idea and led others to accept it and
bring it into reality.
4. Action
Even your best ideas may be obsolete within months, not years. So hurry. Fast action is
required. If you have a good idea, you need to turn that idea into a good product or good
service. You have to take the idea and make something out of it. Taking “action on time”
is an important characteristic of successful entrepreneurs. With the advent of new technology
and the growth of information technology and global competition, to become first you have
to act fast. Speed is a vital factor in today’s success. New products and new strategies emerge
almost daily.
For example, hundreds of dot-com companies around the globe are trying to copy eBay’s
success on the auction business; virtually none is successful. Chrysler’s PT Cruiser and 3M’s
Palm Pilot are still the leaders in their product lines due to “action on time.” Many companies
may try to copy them, but none has had similar success. The most important step that
successful leaders take is “action on time.” It is also the step where most ideas die. Almost
everyone has good ideas, but how many are acted upon? Commitment to fast action is the key
to success.
Proactive actions characterize market leaders. Michael Dell comments: “We’ve learned that
we can’t just follow the other guys. That approach won’t create a lot of value. We try to find
our own way and do things better. We may borrow good ideas from other companies when
we see them, but we’re not held to convention—and we’re not striving to be like other
companies. We’re not trying to remake our company or merge with other firms so that we
can have a different profile. We are building our own path.”
5. Leverage
The fifth link is leverage. Leverage the idea, capture market share, and create wealth. The
team who surrounds the individual Talent must leverage the idea into something much
bigger. Together they enlarge the scope and scale by leveraging the idea through alliances
and other means.
As Michael Dell comments: “We will continue to grow our business. Along with our talented
team of employees, we plan to take the company to its full potential—for our customers,
shareholders, and employees—for years to come.”
Talent drives this chain of events to turn good ideas into reality. The combination of these
five links yields the innovative product. Ideas die anywhere on this chain if there is not
commitment to the idea.
I—Invest in Yourself
Determination must be the first impulse toward becoming successful. Before you can find
anything, you must find yourself. Soar on your strengths and contain your weaknesses until
you can transform them into new strengths. Seek perfection—zero defects—in the product or
process by fostering a zero defect philosophy in your people. Invest in them and help them to
invest in themselves to gain the self-knowledge and self-confidence needed to help you win.
Without investing wisely and regularly in Talent, you can’t have great returns.
D—Different Thinking
In the future, there will be tremendous competition for everything, and the only way you can
compete is to do a different thing or do a common thing differently. The strong comeback of
Apple Computer Company is mostly credited to its founder, Steve Jobs, who characterizes
himself as well as his organization with a simple motto: “Think Different.” None of the other
computer manufacturers had ever thought about using multicolored plastic bodies for
personal computers before Jobs’s iMac. Its success is not necessarily due to the product
innovation or better performance, but rather to the “think different” strategy. Using the same
strategy, the United Kingdom’s most admirable entrepreneur, Anita Roddick, built her
cosmetics empire, The Body Shop. Roddick’s bold declaration: “Small chest, flabby thighs,
large hips, thick lips, BIG DEAL—love your body.” Different thinking creates value for the
organization and society. Cultivation of mind produces different thinking.
E—Emotional Commitment
Commitment with emotion is the key to any success. In India it is called sadhana. When the
famous sitarist Ravi Shankar was learning sitar from his guru, he didn’t leave his room for
many days until he learned the basics. He devoted all his time to sitar. That takes emotional
commitment. Throughout history, you see the greatest successes coming from those who
exhibited undying commitment. Michael Dell, Bill Gates, and Anita Roddick are emotionally
committed to their endeavors. Their emotional commitment has helped them succeed. They
all love their work. They have their own mission and commitment. Rather than jumping into
the dot-com frenzy, they focused on their own beliefs. They want to create organizations that
will dominate the economic landscape. They are passionate about making a contribution to
society and creating a business culture of enlightenment. They want to create and deliver real
value to their customers and shareholders. They have a “love it or leave it” philosophy. They
don’t do things only because they want to hit revenue numbers; rather, they “just do it”
because they have emotional commitment. Michael Dell had a dream to beat IBM while IBM
was the giant in the computer market. He succeeded by making the dream come true through
his own emotional commitment.
The success of General Electric (GE ) is largely credited to retired CEO Jack Welch’s
leadership in creating an “emotional bond” with employees. GE’s Six Sigma initiative is not
just a CEO-driven quality initiative. It is a management philosophy from top to bottom.
Everyone is learning the same language of Six Sigma’s revolutionary five-step process:
define, measure, analyze, improve, and control (DMAIC ). This philosophy creates an
emotional bond among employees. And the results show it: GE reported record results; 2000
earning per share $1.27, up 19 percent; 2000 revenues grew 16 percent to $130 billion;
earnings up 19 percent to $12.7 billion. Welch reported: “GE’s double-digit increases in 2000
demonstrate the benefits of the company’s emphasis on globalization, growth in services, Six
Sigma quality, and e-Business.”
Emotional commitment makes the difference between workers and fighters. Workers are
typical 8-to-5 performers; fighters are reaching for excellence. They want to be winners in
everything they do, whereas workers may not have that winning mentality. Workers are
contractually obligated to do their jobs; fighters are mentally obligated. Fighters are risk
takers, whereas workers are risk adverse. Above all, fighters are always emotionally
committed.
Most workers don’t have a winning mentality because they don’t have a sense of ownership.
If you own something, then you don’t want to lose it. Profit sharing, reward, recognition, and
bonuses are key ingredients to seed ownership within workers. In GE’s Six Sigma initiative,
“black belts” receive rewards for completing projects successfully and saving GE’s bottom
line. Contrast this level of commitment with that of many failed dot-coms whose owners
admitted to starting a business just to go public or to be bought out.
A—Action
The most important thing that successful entrepreneurs do is take “action on time,” as
mentioned earlier. The attitude of “Just do it”—the slogan of Nike’s founder and chairman,
Phil Knight—is necessary for any success. If you have a bright idea, you must act on it;
otherwise, someone else will eat your lunch. If you are not an implementer, find a partner
who is.
Michael Dell notes: “A lot of favorable economics occur when you take time out of the
process. Dell’s model has about eight days of inventory. One competitor has 81 days of
inventory and 40 more days of inventory in their distribution channel—16 weeks more than
our eight days. A competitor with that level of inventory can’t compete with Dell and make
any money doing it. As a result, our business is growing fast, and our profitability exceeds
that of all of our major competitors combined.”
We maintain an intense focus on the customer, even as we grow. Today, Dell is still ranked
number one in customer satisfaction surveys. Our account teams work face-to-face with all of
our large customers. We work with our suppliers to deliver materials on a pull basis. Instead
of waiting to build a machine until we have all the materials in the warehouse, and then
guessing what people will buy, we focus on how fast the inventory is moving. If we can
shorten that time, not only will we save our customers a lot of money, but also they’ll get a
superior product that meets their precise requirements.
The next frontier of competition is in the area of customer service quality. We’re constantly
looking for breakthroughs, such as our direct business model, that change the dynamics of
the game. Finding a new way to deliver a better customer experience and more value at less
cost is a good strategy.
By following the Talent value chain, you, too, can deliver a better experience for employees,
customers, and all other stakeholders.
Although Dell admits making mistakes, we learned from them. We’ve developed overly
ambitious products that tried to do everything for everybody—without a focus, they were
bound to fail. The answer is not having a brilliant conception of all the best ideas before you
start, but rather learning from your mistakes and not repeating them—and making sure that
those lessons are passed along. As Dell states:
“There is such a thing as excessive growth that is not only too fast but dangerous. We grew
in one year from $890 million in sales to $2.1 billion in sales. It was exciting, but one year
later we hit the wall. We had to learn how to understand the profitability of different parts of
our business, where our business was succeeding and where it wasn’t, and how to anticipate
and build an infrastructure to support growth.
When we had to focus on our best opportunities, we adopted the idea that return on invested
capital was a great way to measure different parts of our business. If the cost of capital is
about 15 percent and a business is earning 20 percent return on invested capital, it is
creating value for shareholders.
By segmenting our business, we found the path to grow into an organization that has many
different businesses. We have a business selling to large customers, to global customers, to
the consumer. And these businesses have different characteristics. You separate those, and
you create management opportunities. This approach allows us not only to aggressively
bring Talent into the company and grow Talent, but also to get very finely focused on the
unique needs of specialized customers and achieve high returns on invested capital.”
Vision is what the company wants to be at a given date in the future. What
business does it want to be in? How big does it want to be? How does it want
to behave politically and socially? What contribution to society does it wish
to make? What culture does it hope to cultivate?
Strategic intent is the actions and behaviors needed to achieve the vision.
Priorities are set and adjusted periodically to keep the company on course,
moving toward the vision. Priorities, for example, might include customer
delight and loyalty, employee delight and loyalty, market share leadership,
social and environmental responsibility, outstanding community citizenship,
sizzling revenue and profit growth, and astonishing return on assets.
Financial priorities are measures of how well people do their jobs and the
outcomes of other priorities. Tactical, short-term actions to cut costs and
increase sales tend to slow rather than accelerate long-term improvement
and growth toward the company’s vision and strategic intent. They are
deviations, backward steps from the strategic intent—often made necessary
by wrong forecasts or wrong actions to adjust to the forecasts.
Lighten up, have fun, be creative, foster innovation in everything you do.
With the vision, mission, strategic intent, and priorities in place, the
management team can establish a system capable of helping the team
achieve the current year’s priorities.
Treat Your Best Talents Like You Treat Your Best Customers
As a member of a management team, you want your Talents to buy what you
are offering. As with customers of your products and services, if your
offerings don’t meet the wants and needs of your Talents, they will seek
alternatives. And like customers, after Talents have left you, they seldom
return.
Effective methods for assessing the wants and needs of Talents include
surveys, interviews, and focus groups. Substantial preparation and planning
are required to conduct these activities. It is best to conduct all three because
different information is derived from each. A good sequence is:
focus groups
interviews
focus groups
interviews
survey
Focus groups and interviews should contain a mix of people who have and
have not participated in interviews and focus groups. The questions and the
style of interactions are revised after each cycle to reflect knowledge gained
from the previous cycles. The survey should go to the entire employee
population. Don’t forget the managers. They are also employees.
Finally, don’t let the process degenerate into a survey about how happy or
unhappy employees are. What you seek are the characteristics of an
organization that outstanding Talents want to join for life.
People factors dominate. Talents consistently cite three needs above all
others. The first is coworkers with whom they can develop a mutual respect
and trust, learn from, bang around ideas with, and collaborate with; and
bosses with whom they can develop a mutual respect and trust, learn from,
bang around ideas with, and collaborate with.
A third need is freedom from fear. Talents shy away from organizations that
exhibit even tiny amounts of fear. Fear is a strong negative attribute, and it
instantly repels Talent.
Other needs include freedom to pursue ideas and passions; a strong culture
of values like honesty, trust, respect, fairness, love, kindness, and
compassion; freedom to participate in outside activities such as professional
societies or universities to stay current and continue to learn; pay for
performance; competitive compensation and in some cases opportunities for
large awards for large contributions; and a dynamic, changing organization
with a winning attitude.
Coworkers
Boss
Company
Always ready to help
Enthusiastic teachers
Intense, continuous learners
Intense listeners for understanding
Supportive
Innovative
Kind and compassionate
Honest
Earnest
Trustworthy, dependable
Respectful
Care about society-environment
Care about our company
Care about our customers
Care about their coworkers
Care about their boss
Care about peers-subordinates
Care about their family
Exude enthusiasm
Exude a winning attitude
Exude a passion for excellence
Foster rapid change
Listen more than talk
Reliably get things done
Have outstanding interpersonal skills
Succession management process
Textual version
Identify which positions, if left vacant, would make it very difficult to achieve
current and future business goals
Identify which positions, if left vacant, would be detrimental to the health,
safety, or security of the Canadian public
STEP 2. Identify Capabilities for Key Areas and Positions
To establish selection criteria, focus employee development efforts, and set
performance expectations, you need to determine the capabilities required for the
key areas and positions identified in Step 1.
Succession plans for all key areas and positions are developed;
Key positions are filled quickly;
New employees in key positions perform effectively; and
Members of designated groups are adequately represented in feeder groups
for key areas and positions
When Developing Your Functional Skills you take action to improve your job, get
others to buy into your ideas, as well as participate in activities that elevate your own
exposure within your organization or field.
Some actions you can take to develop Functional Skills…
Create tools to proactively communicate your information: share goals and results
with others.
Make an effort to teach others: explain why certain things are important to you and
the company; helping others to understand your role.
Listen to feedback: seek out feedback from those you work with (your boss, other
departments, your employees and your customers). Understand the needs they have
when working with you and identify what you could do better to support them.
Participate in continuous education, seminars, etc.… to update your skills.
When Developing Your Cross Functional Skills you take action to study the
functional skills of other jobs or professions in order to develop a more well rounded view of
the business. It is not enough to look at the people you already interact with. Instead, you
must learn about ALL business functions. Every aspect of business relates to your job. By
developing your skills cross-functionally, you will be able to identify what key professional
relationships exist, and how to improve upon them.
Some actions you can take to develop Cross Functional Skills…
Learn the goals and results of other departments or other levels in your
company’s hierarchy.
Learn what is important to other departments and individuals in your
company (their needs). Understand different roles and the impact they have on the
business.
Establish a working understanding of what each functional area of your business
should be doing and how they should work together.
There Are Three Major Benefits to Developing Cross Functional
Skills
1. You will know how to talk with others so that they listen to you.
2. You will understand how to show others that you respect the value they bring and
communicate with them in terms they will be able to understand and act upon.
3. Another benefit of cross-functional development pertains to management and
leadership. Nobody has expertise in every field, but leaders are responsible for
managing people within various business roles. If you are managing others, you
should have a general understanding not only of their responsibilities, but the
expectation they should be setting for themselves. Managers can use cross-functional
skills as a means to set expectations for their employees.
4. The value of your personality and ability to get along with others is huge…and should
not be taken for granted. But once you develop cross-functional skills, your value
becomes an expertise that trumps personality. You bring value to your organization
by creating yourself as a central point resource. Very few people understand your
business, how things work, how things get done effectively (this point can’t be
stressed enough). If you can provide that value to all areas of your company, you will
set yourself up for more responsibility and future promotions.
Now, one question that always comes up on this subject is: It is a very valid question.
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA
What you are trying to do is chronicle process flows, understand the business and try to
integrate what you are doing to become more service oriented.
Be honest with people.
Explain to others that you want to learn the business.
Ask for a formal sit-down with people outside of your area of expertise to review your
understanding of what happens in each department and find out if your views are
accurate-having them fill in the blanks.
A TDB is not the same as a training and development budget. A training and
development budget is not allocated for attracting and holding Talent or
replacing Talent.
For example, if your CEO quits and goes to a competitor, and you have no
budget to replace that CEO, you suddenly must incur a significant,
unbudgeted expense. If you don’t have the budget, you don’t know what to
do when you suddenly lose a key person. And yet it is foolish not to
anticipate losing key Talent occasionally.
For example, when a Fortune 10 company announced its new CEO after one
of its most successful CEOs retired, three other people in consideration quit
immediately. They assumed that in the next ten to twenty years they might
not have a chance to become the CEO of the same organization. So, they
accepted positions in three different organizations. The company might have
anticipated this, but if it did not have replacement costs budgeted at that
time, it would have had to use unbudgeted funds, which is always awkward
at that level. Even if it promoted internal executives to fill those positions, it
would still incur a heavy replacement cost.
Flawless hiring of key executives is one of the critical factors for success. To
achieve flawless hiring, you must dedicate sufficient time to select the right
people, hire them, and bring them into the organization. You have to invest a
lot of money. You can’t just put an advertisement in Fortune or the Wall
Street Journal and be done.
After a company sets its goals and knows its capability, its management can
prepare a TDB and plan to fund its key resources to meet the goals. For
example, if a company plans to implement a Six Sigma initiative, its
management may set goals to train three thousand employees in two years,
spend $2 million on training and developing key Talent, and save $20 million
on the projects. After the company sets such performance goals,
management then allocates budget money to be spent in that way.
Talent can make a significant difference in any business. For example, if you
give the same brush and paints to an ordinary person and to a very talented
painter, you will see the difference in their artwork. Similarly in business,
outstanding Talent can produce outstanding results using the same
resources. To meet their goals, managers should decide if they should bring
in new Talents or train existing Talents. They should calculate the return on
investment in attracting, holding, and training Talent.
The costs of attracting and hiring include salary, benefits, and recruitment
costs. Holding costs include salary, compensation, and all other benefits
related to retaining Talent. Replacement costs include severance pay and all
other benefits paid to Talents who will be replaced and all other costs
associated with bringing in new Talents to those positions. Development and
training costs include all costs related to training Talent.
The first part of the Talent development budget is the cost of attracting and
holding Talent. A Talent may say, “I am doing this much work” and challenge
you or threaten you, saying, “If you don’t give me this, I will quit today. I
have a much better offer.” If you need that person in your organization, that
is a sudden and unnecessary cost. If you don’t have a budget, how can you
spend the money? Often managers lose some of their best people over a
small amount of money.
Employees who ask for more money must present a solid business argument.
If you feel the argument is valid, then use the budget and spend the money,
especially if you cannot afford to lose that Talent right now.
Calculating the true value of a Talent is not easy. Management should decide
the value of a Talent based upon performance, success, and goodwill. Hiring
and holding good people with the right value are challenging. It is difficult to
determine, for example, the exact value of your company’s president.
Difficult though it may be, the art of determining the value of Talent and
preparing a TDB will be the key to success.
When Talents are seen as a fixed cost, they will leave. Talents should be seen
as a variable cost. Most year-end bonuses depend on how many problems
you solve temporarily, but talented people who create long-term value
should be rewarded more than those who create short-term value. Most
organizations give a big bonus to the firefighters. Suppose I am a firefighter,
and you are a fire preventer. You are trying to design the product in such a
way that the defect would not exist in the first place. Both of us report to the
same boss, and he comes to me saying “This is a problem. Can you please
solve it within six months?” I solve the problem. You say, “I can’t solve this
problem in six months. I need nine months to a year.” But when you solve
the problem, that defect will never come back because you will solve it by
eliminating the defects from the root. In most cases, our boss will reward me
instead of you. Your reward should be five times more than my reward. As it
is, there is no reward for you, even though you are the true Talent.
The cost of Talent is highly variable. Organizations should pay their people
based on a performance measurement unit, the evaluation of performance
being the key element for determining salary. Performance should be based
upon the quality and quantity of work. Often, managers analyze short-term
operating performance but don’t assess long-term value, and so they don’t
know how much to spend to bring in talented people. Value here means the
price you pay for Talent relative to returns on your Talent investment.
Because there is no definitive market value for Talent, it is hard to hold good
people with the right value (price tag).
Determining the acquisition and replacement cost of Talent and the total
value of Talent is an art, not a science. It’s never easy to determine the value
of the people in an organization. When an organization wants to acquire new
Talents, management should estimate how much it should spend to acquire
those Talents by calculating the value of those Talents from past success and
any goodwill created by the Talents. Organizations should measure the
performance of their Talents. Based upon the performance and past success
and goodwill, management should put a price tag on Talents. If managers
want to acquire new Talents who don’t have any experience or past success,
they should implement a flexible, performance-based salary structure.
Managers can minimize losses that occur during this time gap by having a
standby team, making a proper contingency plan, and accelerating the hiring
process. If you don’t have a contingency plan, you will lose much time and
money. The time gap between when you lose a person and when you hire a
person will widen. It might widen to even three or four months. This gap
represents a high opportunity cost, a huge opportunity loss. A contingency
plan can reduce the damage from a loss of a key Talent. Once a friend called
to tell me his number one man in Japan had just quit. My friend had a
meeting with a client, and the employee who just quit had managed that
client’s account. “We are trying to expand our consulting service within this
client, and, now, our lead guy is gone. Can you assist me in any way?” Luckily,
I found somebody from our office to support my friend. If he had had a
contingency plan, he would not have been so desperate. He would have just
sent another person he was developing in the event that such a situation
arose.
Management has to be ready for Talent shifts by having an alternative plan
for key Talent. If you lose key Talent, you need to know what immediate
actions you can take. If you have an alternative plan, you can minimize the
impact of losing key Talent dramatically in terms of both time and cost.
Martin recalls that in the 1980s, Taco Bell was in trouble. The company had
experienced several years of negative sales growth. The stores were dark,
menus limited, and advertising flat. The industry joke was that Taco Bell was
such a well-kept secret that most people thought it was a Mexican phone
company. “When my management team came on board, we began a change,
starting with the way we listened to and responded to our employees and
customers. We asked them what they wanted, we listened, and we realized
that the products, systems, and prices that may have served us well in the
past wouldn’t satisfy our customers in the future. Following extensive market
research, we implemented the first phase of our value program and turned
our business upside-down to give our customers better quality, better service
and greater convenience—and all at a lower price.”
With the help of new technology, Taco Bell moved much of the slicing, dicing,
and cooking that took place in the back of its restaurants to consolidated
sites to allow employees to focus instead on final product assembly and
service. Martin reports:
These initiatives helped ensure food quality, order accuracy, speed of service,
enhanced safety, and improved quality of life for our people. The key to our
success is the empowerment we have given to our people. Our
empowerment philosophy is based on the premise that to change what
people believe they can do, you must first change their experience. We felt
that our people could do far more than our industry gave them credit for. If
we were serious about reaching our goals, we could either build a work force
of unmanageable proportions, or we could create an environment that
encouraged self-sufficiency and empowerment. We chose the latter. We
committed ourselves to leveraging the talent of our people, and the more
responsibility we gave them, the more they wanted. At every level, our
people exceeded our expectations. They were turned on by the opportunities
we presented and inspired by the challenges.
We are striving to break down the functional silos that limit what our people
have been told they can do. Today we are seeing more initiatives coming
from the field. By empowering our people, we have sent the message that
everything within our business is fair game.