Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

What Is The Communicative Approach?

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

COMMUNICATIVE APPROACH

What is the communicative approach?

The Communicative Approach – or Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) – is a teaching


approach that highlights the importance of real communication for learning to take place. In this
post, you’ll find definitions, examples and ideas for classroom activities.

The communicative approach is based on the idea that learning language successfully comes
through having to communicate real meaning. When learners are involved in real communication,
their natural strategies for language acquisition will be used, and this will allow them to learn to
use the language.

Example
Practising question forms by asking learners to find out personal information about their
colleagues is an example of the communicative approach, as it involves meaningful
communication.

In the classroom
Classroom activities guided by the communicative approach are characterised by trying to produce
meaningful and real communication, at all levels. As a result there may be more emphasis on skills
than systems, lessons are more learner-centred, and there may be use of authentic materials.

In the Communicative Approach, real communication and interaction is not only the objective in
learning, but also the means through which it takes place. This approach started in the 70s and
became prominent as it proposed an alternative to the then ubiquitous systems-oriented
approaches, such as the Audiolingual method. That means that, instead of focusing on the
acquisition of grammar and vocabulary (grammatical/linguistic competence), the Communicative
Approach aimed at developing the learner’s competence to communicate in the target language
(communicative competence), with an enhanced focus on real-life situations.

According to Jack C. Richards, a learner can develop communicative competence by:

This change has had a huge impact on


classroom materials, course books, teaching techniques and the teacher’s role in the
classroom, and still influences English language teaching and learning up to this day. 

Some key features of the Communicative Approach 

● Lessons have communicative aims


Communicating meaning is the main goal in CLT, and language is seen as a tool for learners to
reach this aim. For this reason, the syllabus of courses that adopt a Communicative Approach
to teaching favour lesson aims that will help students practice and develop their linguistic
competence, rather than their grammatical competence. In order to achieve this, different
types of syllabi were created, amongst them, the functional-notional syllabus, that enables
learners to focus on the meaning (function) of language and practice it in a realistic setting:

Besides that, the syllabus might also include work on the four skills (Reading, Writing, Listening
and Speaking), as their development is vital for students to perform real-life goals. The skills are
many times worked with simultaneously in what is known as integrated-skills approach. For
instance, in a listening lesson, students can be asked to watch a video online and post their
opinion about it in the comment section. Instead of just asking learners to leave their comment,
the teacher might work on the appropriate language, vocabulary and register for this text
explicitly, integrating the writing skill in a listening lesson.

This is desirable when adopting the Communicative Approach because it seems more realistic: in
genuine communication, skills are seldom employed in isolation, and an integrated-skills approach
simulates what happens in real life. The source of the texts in skills lessons is also important. In the
Communicative Approach, authentic texts are usually favoured, as they might provide learners
with exposure to a more genuine use of language.  

● Teacher acts as a facilitator in the learning process

In the Communicative Approach, learners are at the centre of instruction. That means that the
teacher’s role has changed when compared to previous methodologies such as Audiolingualism
and the Direct Method. The teacher is now seen as a facilitator in the learning process, and some
of the responsibilities attributed to them are:

● Fluency and accuracy practice


In order to help learners improve their communicative competence, it is important to provide a
range of practice activities. Although the ultimate aim is genuine communication, there is room for
activities and exercises that ensure students practice language in a more controlled manner,
focusing on the development of accuracy. These should not, however, be the only source of
language practice. Activities that focus on the development of fluency are a vital part of a
Communicative Approach lesson, as they give learners the opportunity to communicate meaning

Activity types and classroom tips:

As the teacher is not the centre of instruction anymore, activities in the Communicative Approach
usually favour student-student interaction and maximise learners opportunities to speak. The
activities below can be used to provide learners with practice of the language, and the level of
support given might vary depending on the stage of the lesson, the lesson aim, and the students’
level of ability. Nevertheless, it is important to stress that preparing students to perform tasks is a
vital step for the successful completion of activities and the development of their communicative
competence. Here are some activities that can be used in a Communicative Approach lesson:

⮚ Role-plays: In role-plays, learners are given an imaginary situation and are asked to
perform a different role or act as themselves in a particular scenario. Role-plays enable
learners to imagine themselves in realistic situations and “rehearse” before they need to
use English in real life. They are also fun and motivating for some learners.  

⮚ Information-gap activities: Information-gap activities require learners to talk to each


other and find out missing information they need to perform a certain task. The
information missing might include words, numbers and even drawings. The main point is
to get students to talk and work collaboratively to share all information they need.

⮚ Jigsaw activities: Jigsaw activities involve learners reading, listening or performing


different tasks at the same time and later sharing what they have done with their peers.
For example, half of the students can be asked to watch a video on a certain topic and the
other half can be asked to watch a different video, with a different viewpoint. After
learners watch the videos and complete tasks for comprehension, they are asked to share
what they had found out with their peers.  

⮚ Open-ended discussions and debates: Debates and discussions can be a useful tool for
fluency practice. They enable learners to share their own views on topics and use their
communicative resource to convey ideas, make points, and agree and disagree with
others. Debates are usually engaging and provide a rich resource for teachers to assess
their learners’ communicative competence. However, preparation for debates should be
done thoroughly to help students succeed.

Developments of the Communicative Approach

After its advent in the 70s, the Communicative Approach branched out into different approaches
and methodologies that aim at helping learners develop their communicative competence and is
now a term that encompasses different approaches to teaching and learning. Some of these
approaches are:Project-based learning, Task-based learning, Content-based instruction, Dogme
ELT
The origins of the Communicative Approach have arisen both in linguistics and in language
teaching as a “reaction against the view of language as a set of structures” (Brumfit and Johnson
3). Formerly, linguistics was concerned mainly with the structure of a language, and as language
teaching is closely connected to contemporary linguistic view, language teachers were mainly
interested in grammatical correctness. In other words, “the „form‟ rather than the „meaning‟ has
dominated the teaching“ (Brumfit and Johnson 2). Eventually, it had been found that the
knowledge of grammar rules itself does not enable students to use the language for
communicative purposes sufficiently.

You might also like