U.S.

Department of Education
Office of Elementary and Secondary Education
Office of Safe and Supportive Schools
Washington, D.C. 20202-6450

Fiscal Year 2019

Application for New Grants Under

the Project Prevent Grant Program

CFDA 84.184M

Dated Material - Open Immediately

Closing Date: July 15, 2019

Approved OMB Number: 1894-0006

Expiration Date: 11/30/2019
 Paperwork Burden Statement
According to the Paperwork reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a
collection of information unless such collection displays a valid OMB control number. The valid
OMB control number for this information collection is: 1894-0006. Public reporting burden for
this collection of information is estimated to average 28 hours per response, including the time
for reviewing instructions, searching existing data resources, gathering and maintaining the data
needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. The obligation to respond
to this collection is required to obtain or retain a benefit EDGAR (34 CFR 75.104(a)).

If you have comments or concerns regarding the status of your individual submission of
this form, write directly to: Nicole White, Project Prevent Grant Program, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW, Room #3E326, Washington D.C. 20202-6450. [Note:
Please do not return the completed application to this address.]

2
 Table of Contents

Project Prevent Grant Fast Facts ............................................................................................ 5

Program Information ............................................................................................................. 6
Background: Effects of Children’s Exposure to Violence and the Federal Response ............................... 6
Frequently Asked Questions ................................................................................................................... 17
Technical Assistance Workshops for Prospective Applicants ................................................................ 25
Tips for Preparing and Submitting an Application................................................................. 26
Application Submission Procedures ..................................................................................... 28
Application Transmittal Instructions ....................................................................................................... 28
Submitting Applications with Adobe Reader Software........................................................................... 31
Grants.gov Submission Procedures and Tips for Applicants .................................................................. 31
Application Instructions ....................................................................................................... 36
Electronic Application Format................................................................................................................. 36
Electronic Application Submission Checklist........................................................................................... 37
Part 1: Preliminary Documents .............................................................................................................. 38
Part 2: Budget Information .................................................................................................................... 45
Part 3: ED Abstract Form ........................................................................................................................ 48
Part 5: Budget Narrative ........................................................................................................................ 53
Important Information Regarding Indirect Costs .................................................................................... 56
Part 6: Other Attachment Form .............................................................................................................. 57
Part 7: Assurances and Certifications ..................................................................................................... 58
Part 8: Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs (Executive Order 12372) ................................ 61
Reporting and Accountability .............................................................................................. 62
Legal and Regulatory Information ........................................................................................ 67
Notice Inviting Applications .................................................................................................................... 67
Authorizing Legislation............................................................................................................................ 92

3
 United States Department of Education
OFFICE OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION
OFFICE OF SAFE AND SUPPORTIVE SCHOOLS

Dear Colleague:

Thank you for your interest in the Project Prevent Grant Program, administered by the Office of
Elementary and Secondary Education of the U.S. Department of Education (Department). This
grant competition will provide funds to local educational agencies (LEAs) to increase their
capacity to help schools in communities with pervasive violence to better address the needs of
affected students and to break the cycle of violence.

Please take the time to review the applicable priorities, selection criteria, and all of the
application instructions thoroughly. An application will not be evaluated for funding if the
applicant does not comply with all of the procedural rules that govern the submission of the
application or the application does not contain the information required under the program
(EDGAR §75.216 (b) and (c)). This competition has three priorities - one absolute priority, and
two competitive preference priorities. The absolute priority and competitive preference priorities
are being established in accordance with section 437(d)(1) of the General Education Provisions
Act (GEPA), 20 U.S.C. 1232(d)(1).

For this competition it is mandatory for applicants to use the government-wide website,
Grants.gov (http://www.grants.gov), to apply. Please note that the Grants.gov site works
differently than the Department’s e-Application System. We strongly encourage you to
familiarize yourself with Grants.gov and strongly recommend that you register and submit early.
Applications submitted to Grants.gov for the Department will now be posted using Adobe forms.
Therefore, applicants will need to download the latest version of Adobe reader (Grants.gov
recommends Adobe Reader 10.1.14). Please review the Submitting Applications with Adobe
Reader Software and Education Submission Procedures and Tips for Applicants forms
found within this package for further information and guidance related to this requirement.

Using fiscal year 2019 funds, the Department expects to award approximately $10,000,000 for
new grants under this competition. We will award discretionary grants on a competitive basis for
a project period of up to 60 months. Grants are expected to be awarded by September 30,
2019.

Please visit our program website at http://www2.ed.gov/programs/projectprevent/index.html

for further information. If you have any questions about the program after reviewing the
application package, please contact Nicole White by telephone at (202) 453-6729 or via email at
Project.Prevent@ed.gov

Paul Kesner, Director

Office of Safe and Supportive Schools

4
Project Prevent Grant Fast Facts

Eligible Applicants: Local educational agencies (LEAs), i.e., public school districts including
charter schools that are considered LEAs under State law.

Purpose: The purpose of the Project Prevent Grant Program is to provide grants to LEAs to
increase their capacity to help schools in communities with pervasive violence to better address
the needs of affected students and to break the cycle of violence.

Application Deadline Date: July 15, 2019

Application Submission: Applications must be submitted electronically via Grants.gov

(www.grants.gov)

Project Period: Up to 60 months

Estimated Available Funds: $10,000,000

Estimated Range of Awards: $250,000 to $1,000,000

Estimated Average Size of Awards: $487,500 (for each year of funding requested)

Estimated Number of Awards: 20

Competition Manager:

• Nicole White at Project.Prevent@ed.gov or (202) 453-6729

5
Program Information

Background: Effects of Children’s Exposure to Violence and the Federal Response

Children’s exposure to violence, whether as victims or witnesses, is often associated with long-
term physical, psychological, and emotional harms. These harms include, among others,
depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic disorders; failing or having difficulty in school; and
delinquency or criminal behavior, including violent acts.1

In December 2018, the Federal Commission on School Safety (FCSS) released its final report.2
The report offers several recommendations for States, local communities, and the Federal
government to improve school safety. The Project Prevent grant program supports activities
directly linked with recommendations identified in the FCSS. Under this program, grantees may
use funds to address some of those FCSS recommendations in their local districts as they
develop approaches to improving school engagement, school safety, and the school environment
for all students.
Project Prevent grants will enable LEAs to increase their capacity to identify, assess, and serve
students exposed to pervasive violence, helping LEAs to offer affected students mental health
services for trauma or anxiety; support conflict resolution programs; and implement other
school–based violence prevention strategies in order to reduce the likelihood that these students
will later commit violent acts.

Eligibility
This competition limits eligibility to LEAs, including charter schools that are considered LEAs
under State law.

Authority
This competition is authorized under 20 U.S.C. 7131; the U.S. Department of Education
Appropriations Act, 2019, Title III of Division H of P.L. 113-76.

Official Documents Notice

The official document governing this competition is the Notice Inviting Applications published
in the Federal Register on June 5, 2019 (See Section III -- [Legal and Regulatory Documents] of
this application package), hereafter referenced as the Notice Inviting Applications. This notice
also is available electronically at the following Web sites: www.ed.gov/legislation/FedRegister
and www.gpoaccess.gov/nara.

1 https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/227744.pdf.
2 https://www2.ed.gov/documents/school-safety/school-safety-report.pdf.

6
Project Period
The project period for these grants is up to 60 months (5 budget periods of 12 months each).
The exact start date is not known at this time. We estimate awards will be announced by late
September 2019. Projects will be funded for the first year with an option for four additional
years contingent upon demonstration of substantial progress by the grantee and the availability of
future funds. Note: Applicants must submit ED Form 524 and a detailed budget narrative
for each budget period that funding is requested (see instructions and sample following in
this application package).

Estimated Award Information

We estimate we will make approximately 20 new awards. Projects will be funded for
approximately $250,000 to $1,000,000 depending on the scope of work. These figures are only
estimates and do not bind the U.S. Department of Education (the Department) to a specific
number of grants or amount of any grant. Contingent upon the availability of funds and the
quality of applications, we may make additional awards in fiscal year (FY) 2020 from the list of
unfunded applications from this competition.

Matching Funds
This program does not require a matching contribution from the grantee, however, if it proposes
matching funds, we will monitor the grant to ensure the match is met and the grantee will be
expected to report annually on the matching funds as well as Federal funds.

Private School Participation

In order to ensure that grant program activities address the needs of private school children, the
applicant must engage in timely and meaningful consultation with appropriate private school
officials during the design and development of the proposed grant project. This consultation
must take place before the applicant makes any decision that affects the opportunities of eligible
private school children, teachers, and other educational personnel to participate. Administrative
direction and control over grant funds must remain with the grantee (See section 9501,
Participation by Private School Children and Teachers, of the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act of 1965 (ESEA), as amended).
Project Director Time Commitment
Applicants are requested to provide the percent of the Project Director’s time that will be
dedicated to the grant project if funded. For example, if the Project Director works 40 hours per
week and spends 20 hours of that week working on grant activities, then the time commitment
for the Project Director would be 50 percent. We suggest that applicants include this information
in the budget narrative or that they add this information to the Project Director line on the
Supplemental Information for Standard Form 424

Travel Budget
Applicants must budget funds for the Project Director and one additional staff member to attend
the Office of Safe and Supportive Students National Conference each year of the grant. For
planning purposes, applicants should include funds for transportation, lodging for two nights and
three days, and per diem costs. If this conference is not held, the funding budgeted for this
activity may be used for another professional development opportunity. Also, applicants must

7
budget funds for one person to attend the Project Director’s Meeting, only required in Year 1of
the grant. Applicants should include funds for transportation, lodging for one night, and per
diem costs. There are no meeting or registration costs for our grantees. Both meetings will most
likely be held in Washington, DC.

E-Mail Addresses
As part of our review of the application, we may need to contact the applicant with questions for
clarification. Please be sure your application contains valid e-mail addresses for the Project
Director and Authorized Representative (or another party designated to answer questions in the
event the Project Director and Authorized Representative are unavailable).

Application Due Date

All applications must be submitted electronically through the Grants.gov portal and must be
submitted before 11:59:59 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the deadline date for applications.

Applications may not be emailed or faxed.

Note: Under very extraordinary circumstances, the Department may change the closing date for
a competition. When this occurs, we announce such a change in a notice published in the
Federal Register. Waivers for individual applications failing to meet the deadline will not be
granted, except in the circumstances described in the section under electronic submission of
applications.

Review of Applications and Notification of Award

The review of applications and notification of awards for this grant competition requires
approximately 8 to 10 weeks depending on the number of applications we receive. We expect to
notify successful applicants of their grant awards by late September 2019. Unsuccessful
applicants will be notified within 60 days after awards are announced.

Human Subjects Research Activities

Please see Item 3 of the instructions for Supplemental Information for Standard Form 424 in
Section IV of this application package. Projects funded under this grant program may be subject
to protection of human subjects research requirements. If you have any questions about your
responsibilities under these requirements, please contact the Department’s Protection of Human
Subjects Coordinator at 202-245-8090.

The U.S. Department of Education’s Expectations

By submitting an application for this program, applicants agree to fully cooperate with any
evaluation efforts conducted by the Department and its contractors. At a minimum, grantees are
expected to maintain records on how their program is operating; maintain records on the extent
to which their program objectives are being met; include specific performance measures in their
evaluation plan; and make ongoing project information, findings, and products available to
ensure the dissemination of knowledge gained from this effort during the grant period.

8
Reports
Each grantee is required to submit an annual and final report to demonstrate progress toward
meeting program performance measures and project objectives. For multiple-year projects, these
reports are also evaluated to determine whether substantial progress has been made to justify a
continuation award. For projects funded for one year, only a final report is required.

Absolute Priority
For FY 2019 and any subsequent year in which we make awards from the list of unfunded
applicants from this competition, this priority is an absolute priority. Under 34 CFR
75.105(c)(3), we consider only those applications that meet this priority.

◼ Expand the capacity of LEAs to assist schools in communities with pervasive

violence to break the cycle of violence by better meeting the needs of affected
students.

Under this priority, we provide funding for projects to expand the capacity of LEAs to
more effectively assist impacted schools in communities with pervasive violence to better
meet the needs of students directly or indirectly exposed to pervasive violence.
Applicants must address each of the following four subparts of this absolute priority.
Projects must offer students: (1) access to school-based counseling services, or referrals
to community-based counseling services, for assistance in coping with trauma or anxiety;
(2) school-based social emotional and behavioral supports for students to help address the
effects of violence; (3) conflict resolution and other school-based strategies to prevent
future violence; and (4) activities designed to promote a safer and improved school
environment, which may include activities designed to decrease the incidence of
harassment, bullying, fighting, gang participation, sexual assault, and substance abuse.

Note: Applicants that fail to meet the absolute priority will be considered ineligible and not
considered for funding.

Projects funded under this priority may use up to 12 months during the first year of the project
period for program planning. Applicants that propose to use this option must provide sufficient
justification for why this program planning time is necessary, provide the intended outcomes of
program planning in Year 1, and include a description of the proposed strategies and activities to
be supported, such as developing baseline Government Performance and Results Act of 1993
data as described in the Performance Measures section of this notice.

Competitive Preference Priorities

For FY 2019 and any subsequent year in which we make awards from the list of unfunded
applicants from this competition, these priorities are competitive preference priorities. Under 34
CFR 75.105.(c)(2)(i), we award an additional eight points to an application that meets
Competitive Preference Priority 1 and an additional two points to an application that meets
Competitive Preference Priority 2.

9
Note: Applicants may address either of the competitive preference priorities or both. An
applicant must identify in the abstract section of its application the competitive preference
priority or priorities it wishes the Department to consider. The Department will not review or
award points under any competitive preference priority for any application that fails to do so.

These priorities are:

◼ Competitive Preference Priority 1 - - Collaboration with a Local Mental Health
Agency (0 or 8 points).

An application that includes a memorandum of agreement (MOA) or memorandum of

understanding (MOU) signed by the authorized representative of a local mental health
agency that agrees to collaborate with the applicant on the proposed project and provide
resources and/or administer services that are likely to substantially contribute to positive
outcomes for the proposed project.

◼ Competitive Preference Priority 2 - - Fostering Knowledge and Promoting the

Development of Skills that Prepare Students to be Informed, Thoughtful, and
Productive Individuals and Citizens (up to 2 points).

Supporting projects likely to improve student academic performance and better prepare
students for employment, responsible citizenship, and fulfilling lives, including by
preparing children or students to do one or more of the following:
• Develop positive personal relationships with others.
• Develop determination, perseverance, and the ability to overcome obstacles.
• Develop self-esteem through perseverance and earned success.
• Develop problem-solving skills.
• Develop self-regulation in order to work toward long-term goals.

Application Requirements
The following requirements apply to all applications submitted under this competition:

(1) Description of the severity and magnitude of the problem and identification of
schools to be served by the proposed project.

Applicants must describe how pervasive violence in the community is specifically

affecting students in schools to be served by project activities. Applicants must describe
the nature of the problem for a specific geographic area, based on information such as,
but not limited to, incidents of community domestic violence or violent crime; rates of
child abuse and neglect; school crime and safety data; student mental health screenings or
assessments; surveys of school climate; surveys of student engagement; or other relevant
data and information as appropriate. The description may also include demographic data
provided by U.S. Census surveys. In order to assess the magnitude of the problem and
ensure the schools selected have the greatest need, data cited must be compared to similar
data at the State or local level, and on a per capita basis (such as homicides per 100,000
persons) when available.
10
(2) Collaboration and coordination with related Federal, State, and local initiatives.

Applicants must describe how they intend to work collaboratively with Federal, State and
local juvenile justice, mental health, public health, child welfare, and other community
agencies to achieve project goals and objectives. Applicants must also describe proposed
coordination with existing federally funded efforts related to youth violence prevention
and mental health promotion (such as the National Forum on Youth Violence Prevention,
Defending Childhood, and other violence prevention-related grants administered by the
U.S. Department of Justice, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration, and
the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), if applicable. Evidence of collaboration
and coordination must be provided through letters of support from local or state agencies
and other federally funded projects, if applicable. Finally, applicants must describe how
they will use Project Prevent Grant Program funds to complement, rather than duplicate,
existing, ongoing, or new efforts to reduce youth violence and mitigate the effects of
pervasive violence on students.

(3) Expand and improve LEA capacity to serve students exposed to pervasive violence
and ensure affected students receive mental health services, as appropriate.

Applicants must describe the specific activities they will conduct to expand and improve
LEA capacity to serve students exposed to pervasive violence, ensure that affected
students receive appropriate mental health services, and break the cycle of violence. To
meet this requirement, the applicant must propose three or more of the following:

a) Professional development opportunities for LEA and school mental health staff
(e.g., counselors, psychologists, social workers, and psychiatrists) on how to screen for
and respond to violence-related trauma and implement appropriate school-based
mitigation strategies.
b) Improving the range, availability, and quality of school-based mental health
services by hiring qualified school psychologists, school counselors, or school social
workers with expertise or training in violence prevention and responding to the mental
health needs of students who have experienced trauma as a result of exposure to violence.
c) Providing training to select school staff (e.g., teachers, administrators, and support
staff), community partners, youth, and parents on the problem of student exposure to
pervasive violence, as well as the importance of screening students and providing
interventions to help students cope with traumatic events.
d) Addressing the needs of students in affected schools by developing or improving
processes to better target services to these students and developing or improving
processes to assess students who are exposed to pervasive violence and who may be
experiencing resulting mental, emotional, or behavioral disorders.
e) Enhancing linkages between LEA mental health services and community mental
health systems to ensure affected students receive referrals to treatment as appropriate,
including linkages that leverage new opportunities under the Patient Protection and

11
 Affordable Care Act, such as the expansion of mental health and substance use disorder
coverage.

(4) Delivery of a continuum of evidenced-based programs and practices in selected

schools to promote conflict resolution, improve school climate and safety, and other
school-based strategies to break the cycle of violence.

Applicants must provide a description of the continuum of the evidence-based programs

and practices that will be implemented at the school level to break the cycle of violence.
The threshold for evidence-based programs is those that, at a minimum, are supported by
evidence of promise (as defined in 34 CFR 77.1(c)). These programs and practices must
include all of the following:

a) Interventions and activities that serve all students in a school, regardless of risk
level, with the goal of preventing negative or violent behavior (such as bullying, fighting,
gang participation, and sexual assault) and enhancing student knowledge and skills
regarding positive behavior (such as conflict resolution and other skills);
b) Interventions and activities (such as those related to anger management, conflict
resolution, promotion of positive behavior, and development of protective factors) that
target individual students or a sub-group of students whose risk of developing mental or
behavioral disorders is significantly higher than average; and
c) Interventions and services that target individual students who are at risk for, and
have shown signs of, mental, emotional, or behavioral disorders; exhibit aggressive,
violent, or disruptive behavior; or participate in gangs.

To meet this requirement, applicants must discuss the research and evidence supporting
the proposed programs and practices and the estimated effects on the target population.
Applicants may use the Federal registries listed in the application package for identifying
such programs and practices.

12
Definitions
The following definitions apply to this competition:

Ambitious means promoting continued, meaningful improvement for program participants or for
other individuals or entities affected by the grant, or representing a significant advancement in
the field of education research, practices, or methodologies. When used to describe a
performance target, whether a performance target is ambitious depends upon the context of the
relevant performance measure and the baseline for that measure.

Baseline data means the starting point from which performance is measured and targets are set.

Evidence of promise means there is empirical evidence to support the theoretical linkage(s)
between at least one critical component and at least one relevant outcome presented in the logic
model for the proposed process, product, strategy, or practice. Specifically, evidence of promise
means the conditions in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section are met:
(i) There is at least one study that is a—
(A) Correlational study with statistical controls for selection bias;
(B) Quasi-experimental study that meets the What Works Clearinghouse
Evidence Standards with reservations;
(C) Randomized controlled trial that meets the What Works Clearinghouse
Evidence Standards with or without reservations.3
(ii) The study referenced in paragraph (a) found a statistically significant or substantively
important (defined as a difference of 0.25 standard deviations or larger), favorable
association between at least one critical component and one relevant outcome presented
in the logic model for the proposed process, product, strategy, or practice.

High-poverty school means a school in which at least 50 percent of students are eligible for free
or reduced-price lunches under the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act or in which at
least 50 percent of students are from low-income families as determined using one of the criteria
specified under section 1113(a)(5) of the ESEA, as amended. For middle and high schools,
eligibility may be calculated on the basis of comparable data from feeder schools. Eligibility as
a high-poverty school under this definition is determined on the basis of the most currently
available data.

Local educational agency (LEA) means:

(1) A public board of education or other public authority legally constituted within a State for
either administrative control or direction of, or to perform a service function for, public
elementary schools or secondary schools in a city, county, township, school district, or other
political subdivision of a State, or of or for a combination of school districts or counties that is

3 What Works Clearinghouse Procedures and Standards Handbook (Version 2.1, September 2011), which can
currently be found at the following link: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/DocumentSum.aspx?sid=19.

13
recognized in a State as an administrative agency for its public elementary schools or secondary
schools.
(2) The term includes any other public institution or agency having administrative control
and direction of a public elementary school or secondary school.
(3) The term includes an elementary school or secondary school funded by the Bureau of
Indian Affairs but only to the extent that including the school makes the school eligible for
programs for which specific eligibility is not provided to the school in another provision of law
and the school does not have a student population that is smaller than the student population of
the local educational agency receiving assistance under this Act with the smallest student
population, except that the school shall not be subject to the jurisdiction of any State educational
agency other than the Bureau of Indian Affairs.
(4) The term includes educational service agencies and consortia of those agencies.
(5) The term includes the State educational agency in a State in which the State educational
agency is the sole educational agency for all public schools.

School engagement means participation in school-related activities, and the quality of school
relationships, which may include relationships between and among administrators, teachers,
parents and students.

Project Prevent Grant Program Resource List

American Counseling Association provides counseling professionals and educators with
resources, services, and information. http://www.counseling.org/

American School Counselor Association provides resources suggested by school counselors.

http://www.schoolcounselor.org

MentalHealth.gov is a website created to educate and guide those interested in mental health
issues. http://www.mentalhealth.gov

National Association of School Psychologists (NASP) is a not-for-profit association representing

more than 25,000 school psychologists from across the United States and abroad.
www.nasponline.org

The National Center on Safe Supportive Learning Environments (NCSSLE) provides training
and support to state administrators, school and district administrators, institutions of higher
education, teachers, support staff at schools, communities and families, and students. It also
seeks to improve schools' conditions for learning through measurement and program
implementation, so that all students have the opportunity to realize academic success in safe and
supportive environments. http://safesupportivelearning.ed.gov

National Institutes of Mental Health (NIMH) the mission of NIMH is to transform the
understanding and treatment of mental illnesses through basic and clinical research, paving the
way for prevention, recovery, and cure.

14
http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/suicide-in-the-us-statistics-and-
prevention/index.shtml

School Social Worker Association of America (SSWAA) is dedicated to promoting the

profession of school social work and the professional development of school social workers in
order to enhance the educational experience of students and their families.
http://www.sswaa.org/

The National Center for Trauma-Informed Care (NCTIC) is the Substance Abuse and Mental
Health Services Administration’s technical assistance center dedicated to building awareness of
trauma-informed care and promoting the implementation of trauma-informed practices in
programs and services. http://www.samhsa.gov/nctic/

Youth.gov was created by the Interagency Working Group on Youth Programs (IWGYP), which
is composed of representatives from 18 federal government agencies that support programs and
services focusing on youth. Through the Youth Topics series on the website, the IWGYP
provides information, strategies, tools, and resources for youth, families, schools and community
organizations related to a variety of cross-cutting topics that affect youth, such as: youth
violence prevention, gang prevention, school climate, youth mental health, and more.

Project Prevent Grant Program Resource List: Federal Registries Useful for
Selecting Evidenced-based Programs and Practices

What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) is an initiative of the Institute for Education Sciences at the
U.S. Department of Education. The goal of the WWC is to be a resource for informed education
decision making. To reach this goal, the WWC identifies studies that provide credible and
reliable evidence of the effectiveness of a given practice, program, or policy (referred to as
“interventions”), and disseminates summary information and reports on the WWC website at
http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/default.aspx

Youth.gov is a Federal government resource that allows website users to search for youth
focused evidence-based programs. It allows for a search by risk and protective factor or using a
keyword search. Finally, it contains information about selecting, implementing, and evaluating
evidence-based and innovative strategies and programs to support youth.

The National Registry of Evidence-based Programs and Practices (NREPP) is a searchable

online database of mental health and substance abuse interventions. All interventions in the
registry have met NREPP’s minimum requirements for review and have been independently
assessed and rated for Quality of Research and Readiness for Dissemination.
www.nrepp.samhsa.gov

CrimeSolutions.gov is an online resource to help practitioners and policymakers understand what

works in justice-related programs and practices. Its purpose is to assist in practical decision
making and program implementation by gathering information on specific justice-related

15
programs and practices and reviewing the existing evaluation and meta-analysis research against
standard criteria. www.crimesolutions.gov

U.S. Department of Justice, Listing of Resources on Evidence-Based Programs and Practices.

www.bja.gov/evaluation/evidence-based.htm

NOTE: The Department does not endorse any of the programs or practices listed above in the
federally supported registries, nor does inclusion in registries mean they meet the minimum
threshold for evidenced-based programs and practices as defined in the Notice Inviting
Applications. It is also possible that certain programs and practices meet this minimum
threshold but, for various reasons, are not included in any of the registries. This resource list is
intended for informational purposes only, and to aid applicants in researching appropriate
evidenced-based program and practices that respond to the absolute priority and application
requirements and meet the unique needs of their target population.

16
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the deadline date for this competition?
➢ The competition deadline for the Project Prevent Grant Program is July 15, 2019.

May I get an extension of the deadline date?

➢ Waivers for individual applications failing to meet the deadline will not be granted,
except in the circumstances described in the Federal Register notice. Under very
extraordinary circumstances the Department may change the closing date for a grant
competition. When this occurs, the Department announces such a change in a notice
published in the Federal Register.

What is an indirect cost?

➢ An indirect cost is an expense that you incur that is necessary to implementing the grant,
but may be difficult to identify directly with your grant. For example, indirect costs may
include money spent for heat, light, rent, telephone, security, accounting, and Internet
use.
➢ See page 17 of this application package and the section “Important Information
Regarding Indirect Costs” for further information.

How do I obtain a negotiated, restricted indirect cost rate?

➢ Your organization may already have a negotiated, restricted indirect cost rate with a
Federal government agency. If your organization has not negotiated this rate in the past,
please contact the Department’s Indirect Cost Group at Indirectcostgroup@ed.gov.

Who in my organization may be able to provide information about our

negotiated, restricted indirect cost rate?
➢ If you do not know your negotiated, restricted indirect cost rate, please contact your
business office. In most cases, State educational agencies (SEAs) calculate and assign
indirect cost rates to its LEAs. Please note you will need to submit proof of this cost rate,
such as a signed letter or a page from a State Web site. This proof of your cost rate will
need to be uploaded to the Other Attachments Form section in Grants.gov.

17
What is an administrative cost?
Administrative costs are normal and customary expenses of administering the grant. For
example, since the project director is responsible for administering the grant, their salary and
benefit costs are taken out of the administrative cost threshold, as well as any other costs the
applicant may have for carrying out the grant.

For my GEPA 427 statement (see page 59) is it adequate to state that our
organization does not discriminate on the basis of race, religion, sex, etc.?
➢ No. An organization’s non-discrimination statement is not sufficient to meet the GEPA
requirements. A GEPA statement should outline an entity’s potential barriers and
solutions to equal access, specific to the proposed project.

How does the Freedom of Information Act affect my application?

➢ The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) provides that any person has the right to request
access to federal agency records or information. All U.S. Government agencies are
required to disclose records upon receiving a written request for them, except for those
records that are protected from disclosure by the nine exemptions listed in the FOIA. All
applications submitted for funding consideration under this grant competition are subject
to the FOIA. To read the text of the FOIA, visit
http://www.ed.gov/policy/gen/leg/foia/foiatoc.html.

Is this program covered by Executive Order 12372?

➢ Yes. This means applicants must submit a copy of their application to their State Single
Point of Contact for review and upload the transmittal letter in the Other Attachments
Form section in Grants.gov (refer to page 56). On the application for Federal Assistance
(Standard Form 424), you must check box (a) in item 19 and provide the date on which
you made your application available for review. Note that the Department is prohibited
from making an award to an entity that has not provided an opportunity for its State to
review the application. The only exceptions to this requirement are applicants from
States that have chosen not to participate or have indicated they do not wish to review
applications from this competition. In either of these cases, applicants should check box
(b). Do not check box (c) since this grant program is covered by Executive Order
12372. For more information about this requirement, see the Intergovernmental Review
of Federal Programs section in this application package.

What is required from an applicant whose State Single Point of Contact

indicates that they are not reviewing applications for this grant competition?
➢ Applicants should include a copy of such a response from the State Single Point of
Contact in their application package submitted to the Department and check the
appropriate line on the SF 424 form.

18
By what date do applicants have to submit their application to their State
Single Point of Contact, if participating?
➢ Applicants must submit their application to the State Single Point of Contact by the
deadline date for transmitting their application to the Department.

What steps should the applicant’s Authorized Representative take before

signing a grant application?
➢ The standard form that serves as a cover sheet for grant applications includes a
certification statement that accompanies the authorized representative’s signature. That
certification indicates that the authorized representative’s signature means that the
information provided in the grant application is true, complete, and to the best of the
authorized representative’s knowledge, and that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent
statements or claims may subject the authorized representative to administrative, civil, or
criminal penalties. As a result, an authorized representative should carefully review a
grant application before signing in order to be sure that all of the information contained in
the application package is correct. Additionally, an authorized representative should be
sure that the application describes a project that has the organization’s support and
reflects an approach that the organization is committed to implementing.

What kinds of activities are likely to be “human subject research”?

➢ The Department’s regulations for the protection of human subjects, 34 CFR Part 97,
defines research as a systematic investigation (including program evaluation) designed to
develop or contribute to general knowledge. A “systematic” investigation typically uses
scientific methods (such as adequate sample sizes, surveys, control groups, and/or
randomization). Research becomes “human subjects” research when the researcher
obtains data about an individual through an intervention or otherwise obtains identifiable
private information about individuals for research purposes. For additional information
on human subjects research go to:
http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocfo/humansub.html.

Are there guidelines for how much money can be spent on consultants?

➢ No. Under EDGAR 75.515, a grantee must use its general policies and practices when it
hires, uses, and pays a consultant as part of the project staff. However, grant funds may
not be used to pay a consultant unless there is a need in the project for the services of that
consultant and the grantee cannot meet that need by using an employee rather than a
consultant.

Are there any restrictions related to external entities or individuals (who are
not LEA employees) who assist the LEA in writing the grant application and
19
who wish to potentially work on grant activities if an award is made?
➢ All procurement transactions by grantees using federal funds must be conducted in a
manner providing full and open competition, consistent with the standards in Section
80.36 (for SEAs and LEAs) of the Education Department General Administrative
Regulations (EDGAR). This section requires that grantees use their own procurement
procedures (which reflect State and local laws and regulations) to select contractors or
other vendors, provided that those procedures meet certain standards described in
EDGAR.

EDGAR is available online at: www.ed.gov/policy/fund/reg/edgarReg/edgar.html

If a vendor or individual not employed by the applicant assists in preparing an application

for a Department grant, and subsequently is interested in providing contract services after
the applicant receives a grant award, a close examination of all activities may be
warranted to ensure the above procurement procedures were followed, consistent with
fair and open competition, and other restrictions not violated.

What is the project and budget period for these grants?

➢ The project period for this grant is up to five years (60 months). Each grant year is
considered its own budget period. The application should include a description of the
proposed activities for all five years, as well as a budget narrative that includes
information about Federal and non-Federal funds for each budget year. Continuation
awards are made based on an applicant’s ability to demonstrate substantial progress in
their required annual performance reports.

An applicant may propose a project period of less than five years (60 months) if the goals
and objectives of the project can be achieved in that time.

Projects funded under this priority may use up to 12 months during the first year of the
project period for program planning. Applicants that propose to use this option must
provide sufficient justification for why this program planning time is necessary, provide
the intended outcomes of program planning in Year 1, and include a description of the
proposed strategies and activities to be supported, such as developing baseline
Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 data as described in the Performance
Measures section of this notice.

What priority and application requirements must all applicants address to be

considered?
➢ Applicants must address the absolute priority: Expand the Capacity of LEAs to Assist
Schools in Communities with Pervasive Violence to Break the Cycle of Violence by
Better Meeting the Needs of Affected Students.

20
 ➢ Applicants must also address the application requirements: (1) Description of the severity
and magnitude of the problem and identification of schools to be served by the proposed
project; (2) Collaboration and coordination with related Federal, State, and local
initiatives; (3) Expand and improve LEA capacity to serve students exposed to pervasive
violence and ensure affected students receive mental health services, as appropriate; and
(4) Delivery of a continuum of evidenced-based programs and practices in selected
schools to promote conflict resolution, improve school climate and safety, and other
school-based strategies to break the cycle of violence.

Who is eligible to apply?

➢ This competition limits eligibility to LEAs, as defined in the notice inviting application.
➢ NOTE: Only entities that meet the definition of LEA may receive funding under this
program. If the definition of LEA is based on special considerations under state law
(such as charter schools, charter management organizations, area educational districts,
educational service center, or other similar entities) proof of LEA status should be
uploaded as an attachment with the application. If possible, this should take the form of a
letter from the applicable SEA verifying the status of the entity as an LEA.

May I submit an application as a school or on behalf of my local school?

➢ No. The only eligible recipients are LEAs (school districts) including charter schools that
are considered LEAs under State law. An application submitted by an individual school,
or on behalf of the school by education foundations, consultants, and community-based
organizations, will not be considered unless it meets the definition of an LEA. See the
note above under who is eligible to apply.

Are colleges or universities eligible to apply for this grant?

➢ No. Colleges and universities are not considered as LEAs and thus are not eligible for
this grant. Only entities that meet the definition of an LEA may receive funding under
this program. See the note above under who is eligible to apply.

Are charter schools eligible for this program?

➢ Charter schools that are considered LEAs under State law are eligible to apply for
funding under this program. If funded, the administration of the project must be
maintained at the Charter school. Charter schools should provide proof of LEA status.
See the note above under who is eligible to apply.

21
Are Area Educational Districts, Educational Service Centers or other similar
entities eligible for this program?
➢ If these entities are considered LEAs under State law, they are eligible to apply for
funding under this program. See the note above under who is eligible to apply.

May an LEA submit multiple applications — each proposing to serve

different schools?

➢ No. LEAs may only submit one application. If multiple applications are submitted, we
will ask for clarification prior to reviewing them about which application the LEA wishes
to be considered.

Do I have to submit my application electronically?

➢ Yes. Unless you qualify for an exception in accordance with the instructions found in the
Notice Inviting Applications, you must submit your application electronically.

How do I submit my grant electronically?

For more information on using Grants.gov, please refer to the Notice Inviting
Applications for this competition published in the Federal Register; the Grants.gov
Submission Procedures and Tips document found in this application package; and/or visit
www.grants.gov.

How do I register to submit my grant electronically?

➢ If you are a new user, you will need to register to use Grants.gov. For detailed
information on the Registration Steps see the Grants.gov Submission Tips and Procedures
for Applicants on pages 32-35 of this document or please go to:
http://www.grants.gov/applicants/get_registered.jsp.

How should I submit forms with signatures?

➢ We strongly encourage you to scan and upload signed versions of the forms, in a .PDF
format, to the Other Attachments Form section of the application package on
Grants.gov or you may fax the signed forms to the Department.
➢ These documents may be faxed to the attention of Nicole White at 202-453-6742 and
must be received within three days of your application submission.

Are there any compatibility restrictions?

➢ You must submit your application in a .PDF (Portable Document) format in order for
your application to submit successfully to the Department. If you submit your

22
 application in any other format, we will not be able to access your document. Applicants
must submit individual .PDF files only when attaching files to their application.
Specifically, the Department will not accept any attachments that contain files within a
file, such as PDF Portfolio files, or an interactive or fillable .PDF file. Any attachments
uploaded that are not .PDF files or are password protected files will not be read. If you
need assistance converting your files to a .PDF format, please refer to this Grants.gov
webpage with links to conversion programs:
http://www.grants.gov/help/download_software.jsp#pdf_conversion_programs

What should I use as the project start date?

➢ Should you receive a grant, the start date for a project may have to be flexible, depending
on when funds can be awarded, and funds obligated. If necessary, your proposed project
start date will be modified to a date shortly after the award date.

Can grant funds be used to support professional development activities?

➢ Yes. Grant funds may be used to support professional development activities, as long as
the activities directly support the purposes and intent of this grant program. See
application Requirement 3.

Can grant funds be used to hire mental health professionals?

➢ Yes. Under application Requirement 3 the applicant must propose three or more
activities which may include: improving the range, availability, and quality of school-
based mental health services by hiring qualified school psychologists, school counselors,
or school social workers with expertise or training in violence prevention and responding
to the mental health needs of students who have experienced trauma as a result of
exposure to violence.

Are we required to identify in the abstract section of the application the

competitive preference priority (or priorities) we address for purposes of
earning competitive preference priority points?

➢ Yes. Applicants may address either of the competitive preference priorities or both. An
applicant must identify in the abstract section of its application the competitive
preference priority or priorities it wishes the Department to consider. The Department
will not review or award points under any competitive preference priority for any
application that fails to do so.

What additional information should be provided to address the competitive

preference priority (or priorities) and where should we provide supporting

23
information to address the competitive preference priority (or priorities) for
the purposes of earning competitive preference priority points?

➢ You should discuss in detail in the application narrative and how you will be addressing
the competitive preference priority (or priorities), as part of the overall proposed project
goals and objectives in the application narrative.

What level of evidence is required to meet application Requirement 4

(Delivery of a continuum of evidenced-based programs and practices in
selected schools)?

➢ The threshold for evidence-based programs is those that, at a minimum, are supported by
evidence of promise (as defined in 34 CFR 77.1(c)):

Evidence of promise means there is empirical evidence to support the theoretical

linkage(s) between at least one critical component and at least one relevant outcome
presented in the logic model for the proposed process, product, strategy, or practice.
Specifically, evidence of promise means the conditions in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this
section are met:
(i) There is at least one study that is a—
(A) Correlational study with statistical controls for selection bias;
(B) Quasi-experimental study that meets the What Works Clearinghouse
Evidence Standards with reservations;
(C) Randomized controlled trial that meets the What Works Clearinghouse
Evidence Standards with or without reservations.
(ii) The study referenced in paragraph (a) found a statistically significant or
substantively important (defined as a difference of 0.25 standard deviations or
larger), favorable association between at least one critical component and one
relevant outcome presented in the logic model for the proposed process, product,
strategy, or practice.

NOTE: What Works Clearinghouse Procedures and Standards Handbook (Version 2.1,
September 2011), which can currently be found at the following link:
http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/DocumentSum.aspx?sid=19.

Are there resources to help applicants find evidenced-based programs and

practices for meeting the requirements of this grant competition?
➢ Yes. On page 15 we list several funded registries and resources for examining the
evidence related to various programs and practices.

24
Who do I contact for more information about this grant competition?
➢ Any questions pertaining to this grant competition should be directed to Nicole White,
U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20202-
6450, Phone: 202-453-6729, Fax: 202-453-6742, Email: Project.Prevent@ed.gov

Technical Assistance Workshops for Prospective Applicants

Technical Assistance – The Office of Safe and Supportive Schools will conduct technical
assistance (TA) conference calls designed to assist applicants who might have questions related
to the application process and procedure for this grant program. Applicants are encouraged to
read through the entire application package before participating in a TA call. The tentative dates
and times are listed below. Applicants should reference our website at:
http://www2.ed.gov/programs/projectprevent/index.html for follow-up information related to
these conference calls.

• June 26, 2019 at 2:00 P.M., Washington, DC time

25
Tips for Preparing and Submitting an Application

Beginning the Application Process

• Read this application package in its entirety and make sure you follow all of the
instructions.
• Use the tools we have provided to help you, including:
✓ Frequently Asked Questions section in this application package.
✓ Resources related to this specific grant competition on our Web site at
http://www.ed.gov/programs/elseccounseling/index.html
• If you do not understand an instruction or requirement, contact Nicole White, U.S
Department of Education, Office of Safe and Supportive Schools at 202-453-6729 or
Project.Prevent@ed.gov for information about this grant competition.

Preparing Your Application

• Organize your narrative according to the selection criteria headings and respond
comprehensively.
• Be thorough in your responses. Write so that someone who knows nothing about your
community and the proposed activities, curricula, programs, and services can understand
what you are proposing and why.
• Make sure your budget provides sufficient itemization and detailed descriptions about
planned expenditures so Department staff can easily determine how amounts were
calculated.
• Link your planned expenditures to the proposed activities, curricula, programs, and
services. Do not request funds for miscellaneous purposes. Make sure you demonstrate
that your proposed expenditures are necessary to carry out your program.

Submitting Your Application

• Use the checklist provided in this application package to ensure your application is
complete before submitting it.
• Make sure all required forms are included and signed by an authorized representative of
your organization.
• Transmit your application by the deadline date and time. When submitting your
application electronically, you must use Grants.gov at: www.grants.gov. Unless you
qualify for an exception in accordance with the instructions found in the Notice Inviting
Applications, you must submit your application electronically.

26
What Happens Next?
• If you submit your application electronically, the PR/Award number will be generated
automatically when you submit your application. Please refer to this PR/Award number
if you need to contact us about your application.
• Staff members screen each application to ensure that all program eligibility requirements
are met and that all forms are included and signed by the Authorized Representative.
• Your application will be assigned to a three-person panel of independent reviewers who
will evaluate and score your proposal according to the selection criteria in this package.
Your application will receive a score from 0 to 100, depending upon how well it
addresses the selection criteria. Agency staff will award any appropriate competitive
preference points. Competitive preference points will be in addition to points awarded by
peer reviewers.
• A Grant Award Notification will be sent to applicants whose proposals rank high enough
to be awarded a grant. Both successful and unsuccessful applicants will receive peer
reviewers’ comments approximately 6 to 8 weeks after grant awards are announced.
Unsuccessful applicants also will receive a notification letter. Please be sure your
application contains a valid mailing address for both the Project Director and the
Authorized Representative so that reviewers’ comments can be successfully delivered.

27
Application Submission Procedures

The deadline for submission of the Project Prevent Grant Program application through
Grants.gov is July 15, 2019.

Application Transmittal Instructions

Attention Electronic Applicants: This program requires the electronic submission of
applications--specific requirements and instructions can be found in the Federal Register notice.
Please note that you must follow the Application Procedures as described in the Federal Register
notice announcing the grant competition.

We will reject your application if you submit it in paper format unless, as described in the
Federal Register notice for this competition, you qualify for one of the exceptions to the
electronic submission requirement and submit, no later than two weeks before the application
deadline date, a written statement to the Department that you qualify for one of these exceptions.

Applications Submitted Electronically

Applications for grants under this program must be submitted electronically using the
Governmentwide Grants.gov Apply site at http://www.Grants.gov. Through this site, you will be
able to download a copy of the application package, complete it offline, and then upload and
submit your application. You may not e-mail an electronic copy of a grant application to us.

Your application must be fully uploaded and submitted and must be date and time stamped by
the Grants.gov system no later than 11:59:59 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application
deadline date. Except as otherwise noted in Federal Register notice for this competition, we
will not consider your application if it is date and time stamped by the Grants.gov system later
than 11:59:59 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date.

You should review and follow the Education Submission Procedures for submitting an application
through Grants.gov that are included in this application package to ensure that you submit your
application in a timely manner to the Grants.gov system.

Please note the following:

• You must attach any narrative sections of your application as files in a .pdf (Portable
Document) format. If you upload a file type other than a .pdf file, or submit a password-
protected file, we will not review that material.

• Grants.gov cannot process an application that includes two or more files that have the same
name within a grant submission.

• When attaching files, applicants should limit the size of their file names. Lengthy file names
could result in difficulties with opening and processing your application. We recommend
28
 your file names be less than 50 characters. The amount of time it can take to upload an
application will vary depending on a variety of factors, including the size of the application
and the speed of your Internet connection. Therefore, we strongly recommend that you do
not wait until the application deadline date to begin the submission process through
Grants.gov.

• Your electronic application must comply with any page-limit requirements described in this
application package.

• If you are experiencing problems submitting your application through Grants.gov, please
contact the Grants.gov Support Desk, toll free, at 1-800-518-4726. You must obtain a
Grants.gov Support Desk Case Number and must keep a record of it.

According to the instructions found in the Federal Register notice, only those requesting
and qualifying for an Exception to the electronic submission requirement may submit an
application via mail, commercial carrier or by hand delivery.

Submission of Paper Applications by Mail:

If you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission requirement, you may mail (through
the U.S. Postal Service or a commercial carrier) your application to the Department. You must
mail the original and two copies of your application, on or before the application deadline date,
to the Department at the following address:

U.S. Department of Education

Application Control Center
Attention: (CFDA Number 84.184M)
LBJ Basement Level 1
400 Maryland Avenue, SW.
Washington, DC 20202-4260

You must show proof of mailing consisting of one of the following:

(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service postmark.
(2) A legible mail receipt with the date of mailing stamped by the U.S. Postal Service.
(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or receipt from a commercial carrier.
(4) Any other proof of mailing acceptable to the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Education.

If you mail your application through the U.S. Postal Service, we do not accept either of the
following as proof of mailing:
(1) A private metered postmark.
(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by the U.S. Postal Service.
If your application is postmarked after the application deadline date, we will not consider your
application.

Note: The U.S. Postal Service does not uniformly provide a dated postmark. Before relying on
this method, you should check with your local post office.
29
Submission of Paper Applications by Hand Delivery:

If you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission requirement, you (or a courier
service) may deliver your paper application to the Department by hand. You must deliver the
original and two copies of your application by hand, on or before the application deadline date,
to the Department at the following address:

U.S. Department of Education

Application Control Center
Attention: (CFDA Number 84.184M)
550 12th Street, SW.
Room 7039, Potomac Center Plaza
Washington, DC 20202-4260

The Application Control Center accepts hand deliveries daily between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30
p.m..m., Washington, DC time, except Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal holidays.

Note for Mail or Hand Delivery of Paper Applications:

If you mail or hand deliver your application to the Department--
(1) You must indicate on the envelope and--if not provided by the Department--in Item 11 of the
SF 424 the CFDA number, including suffix letter, if any, of the competition under which you are
submitting your application; and
(2) The Application Control Center will mail to you a notification of receipt of your grant
application. If you do not receive this notification within 15 business days from the application
deadline date, you should call the U.S. Department of Education Application Control Center at
(202) 245-6288.

30
Submitting Applications with Adobe Reader Software
The Department of Education, working with Grants.gov, is currently moving from using
PureEdge software to using Adobe Reader software exclusively and applications submitted to
Grants.gov for the Department of Education will be posted using Adobe forms. Applicants will
no longer need to use the PureEdge software to create or submit an application.
Please note: The compatible version of Adobe Reader is required for viewing, editing and
submitting a complete grant application package for the Department of Education through
Grants.gov. Applicants should confirm the compatibility of their Adobe Reader version before
downloading the application. To ensure applicants have a version of Adobe Reader on their
computer that is compatible with Grants.gov, applicants are encouraged to visit Grants.gov
BEFORE attempting to submit an application to check compatibility

Important issues to consider:

• If the applicant opened or edited the application package with any software other than the
compatible version of Adobe Reader, the application package may contain errors that will be
transferred to the new package even if you later download the compatible Adobe Reader
version.
• Applicants cannot copy and paste data from a package initially opened or edited with an
incompatible version of Adobe Reader and will need to download an entirely new package
using the compatible version of Adobe Reader.
• Some applicants using an incompatible version of Adobe Reader may have trouble opening
and viewing the application package while others may find they can open, view and complete
the application package but may not be able to submit the application package through
Grants.gov.
• Grants.gov does not guarantee to support versions of Adobe Reader that are not compatible
with Grants.gov.
• Any and all edits made to the Adobe Reader application package must be made with the
compatible version of Adobe Reader.

Applicants are reminded that they should submit their application a day or two in advance of the
closing date as detailed in the Federal Register Notice. If you have any questions regarding this
matter, please email the Grants.gov Contact Center at support@grants.gov or call 1-800-518-
4726

Grants.gov Submission Procedures and Tips for Applicants

To facilitate your use of Grants.gov, this document includes important submission procedures
you need to be aware of to ensure your application is received in a timely manner and accepted
by the Department of Education.

31
ATTENTION – Adobe Forms and PDF Files Required
Applications submitted to Grants.gov for the Department of Education will be posted using
Adobe forms. Therefore, applicants will need to download the latest version of Adobe reader (at
least Adobe Reader 10.1.14). (Please note that in early 2013, Grants.gov discovered an issue
with the newest version of Adobe Reader XI but it was subsequently resolved.) We strongly
recommend that you review details on how to submit an application on www.Grants.gov before
completing and submitting your application. In addition, applicants should submit their
application a day or two in advance of the closing date as detailed below. Also, applicants are
required to upload their attachments in .pdf format only. (See details below under “Attaching
Files – Additional Tips.”) If you have any questions regarding this matter, please email the
Grants.gov Contact Center at support@grants.gov or call 1-800-518-4726.

1) REGISTER EARLY – Grants.gov registration involves many steps including registration

on SAM (www.sam.gov) which may take approximately one week to complete, but could
take upwards of several weeks to complete, depending upon the completeness and accuracy
of the data entered into the SAM database by an applicant. You may begin working on your
application while completing the registration process, but you cannot submit an application
until all of the Registration steps are complete. Please note that once your SAM registration
is active, it will take 24-48 hours for the information to be available in Grants.gov, and
before you can submit an application through Grants.gov. For detailed information on the
Registration Steps, please go to: http://www.grants.gov/web/grants/register.html [Note:
Your organization will need to update its SAM registration annually (formerly Central
Contractor Registry (CCR)*.]

Primary information about SAM is available at www.sam.gov . However, to further assist

you with obtaining and registering your DUNS number and TIN in SAM or updating your
existing SAM account, the Department of Education has prepared a SAM.gov Tip Sheet
which you can find at: http://www2.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/sam-faqs.html

2) SUBMIT EARLY – We strongly recommend that you do not wait until the last day
to submit your application. Grants.gov will put a date/time stamp on your
application and then process it after it is fully uploaded. The time it takes to upload
an application will vary depending on a number of factors including the size of the
application and the speed of your Internet connection, and the time it takes Grants.gov to
process the application will vary as well. If Grants.gov rejects your application (see step
three below), you will need to resubmit successfully to Grants.gov before 11:59:59 p.m.
Washington, DC time on the deadline date.

Note: To submit successfully, you must provide the DUNS number on your
application that was used when you registered as an Authorized Organization
Representative (AOR) on Grants.gov. This DUNS number is typically the same
number used when your organization registered with the SAM (formerly CCR -
Central Contractor Registry). If you do not enter the same DUNS number on your

32
 application as the DUNS you registered with, Grants.gov will reject your
application.

3) VERIFY SUBMISSION IS OK – You will want to verify that Grants.gov received your
application submission on time and that it was validated successfully. To see the
date/time your application was received, login to Grants.gov and click on the Track My
Application link. For a successful submission, the date/time received should be earlier
than 11:59:59 p.m. Washington, DC time, on the deadline date, AND the application
status should be: Validated, Received by Agency, or Agency Tracking Number Assigned.
Once the Department of Education receives your application from Grants.gov, an Agency
Tracking Number (PR/award number) will be assigned to your application and will be
available for viewing on Grants.gov’s Track My Application link.

If the date/time received is later than 11:59:59 p.m. Washington, D.C. time, on the
deadline date, your application is late. If your application has a status of “Received” it is
still awaiting validation by Grants.gov. Once validation is complete, the status will either
change to “Validated” or “Rejected with Errors.” If the status is “Rejected with Errors,”
your application has not been received successfully. Some of the reasons Grants.gov
may reject an application can be found on the Grants.gov site:
http://www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants/applicant-faqs/tracking-an-application.html.

For more detailed information on troubleshooting Adobe errors, you can review the
Adobe Reader Error Messages document at:
http://www.grants.gov/web/grants/support/technical-
support/troubleshooting/encountering-error-messages.html.

If you discover your application is late or has been rejected, please see the instructions
below. Note: You will receive a series of confirmations both online and via e-mail about
the status of your application. Please do not rely solely on e-mail to confirm whether
your application has been received timely and validated successfully.

Submission Problems – What should you do?

If you have problems submitting to Grants.gov before the closing date, please contact Grants.gov
Customer Support at 1-800-518-4726 or http://www.grants.gov/web/grants/about/contact-
us.html, or access the Grants.gov Self-Service web portal at: https://grants-
portal.psc.gov/Welcome.aspx?pt=Grants

If electronic submission is optional and you have problems that you are unable to resolve before
the deadline date and time for electronic applications, please follow the transmittal instructions
for hard copy applications in the Federal Register notice and get a hard copy application
postmarked by midnight on the deadline date.

If electronic submission is required, you must submit an electronic application before 11:59:59
p.m., unless you follow the procedures in the Federal Register notice and qualify for one of the
exceptions to the electronic submission requirement and submit, no later than two weeks before
33
the application deadline date, a written statement to the Department that you qualify for one of
these exceptions. (See the Federal Register notice for detailed instructions.)

Helpful Hints When Working with Grants.gov

Please note, once you download an application from Grants.gov, you will be working offline and
saving data on your computer. Please be sure to note where you are saving the Grants.gov file
on your computer. You will need to logon to Grants.gov to upload and submit the application.
You must provide the DUNS number on your application that was used when you
registered as an Authorized Organization Representative (AOR) on Grants.gov.

Please go to http://www.grants.gov/web/grants/about/contact-us.html for help with Grants.gov.

For additional tips related to submitting grant applications, please refer to the Grants.gov Submit
Application FAQs found on the Grants.gov
http://www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants/applicant-resources.html.

Dial-Up Internet Connections

When using a dial up connection to upload and submit your application, it can take significantly
longer than when you are connected to the Internet with a high-speed connection, e.g. cable
modem/DSL/T1. While times will vary depending upon the size of your application, it can take
a few minutes to a few hours to complete your grant submission using a dial up connection. If
you do not have access to a high-speed connection and electronic submission is required,
you may want to consider following the instructions in the Federal Register notice to obtain
an exception to the electronic submission requirement no later than two weeks before the
application deadline date. (See the Federal Register notice for detailed instructions.)

MAC Users
For MAC compatibility information, review the Operating System Platform Compatibility Table
at the following Grants.gov link: http://www.grants.gov/web/grants/support/technical-
support/recommended-software.html. If electronic submission is required and you are
concerned about your ability to submit electronically as a non-windows user, please follow
instructions in the Federal Register notice to obtain an exception to the electronic
submission requirement no later than two weeks before the application deadline date. (See
the Federal Register notice for detailed instructions.)

Attaching Files – Additional Tips

Please note the following tips related to attaching files to your application, especially the
requirement that applicants only include read-only, non-modifiable .PDF files in their
application:

1. Ensure that you attach .PDF files only for any attachments to your application, and
they must be in a read-only, non-modifiable format. PDF files are the only
Education approved file type accepted as detailed in the Federal Register application
notice. Applicants must submit individual .PDF files only when attaching files to
their application. Specifically, the Department will not accept any attachments that
contain files within a file, such as PDF Portfolio files, or an interactive or fillable
34
 .PDF file. Any attachments uploaded that are not .PDF files or are password
protected files will not be read. If you need assistance converting your files to a .pdf
format, please refer to the following Grants.gov webpage with links to conversion
programs under the heading of additional resources:
http://www.grants.gov/web/grants/support/technical-support/software/pdf-
conversion-software.html

2. Grants.gov cannot process an application that includes two or more files that have the
same name within a grant submission. Therefore, each file uploaded to your
application package should have a unique file name.

3. When attaching files, applicants should follow the guidelines established by

Grants.gov on the size and content of file names. Uploaded files must be less than 50
characters in the file name, contain no spaces, no special characters (example: -, &, *,
%, /, #, \) including periods (.), blank spaces and accent marks. Applications
submitted that do not comply with the Grants.gov guidelines will be rejected at
Grants.gov and not forwarded to the Department.

4. Applicants should limit the size of their file attachments. Documents submitted that
contain graphics and/or scanned material often greatly increase the size of the file
attachments and can result in difficulties opening the files. For reference, the average
discretionary grant application package totals 1 to 2 MB. Therefore, you may want to
check the total size of your package before submission.

*Please note that the Central Contractor Registry (CCR) was replaced by the System for
Award Management (SAM) effective July 30, 2012. For more information on the
migration of CCR data to SAM, grant applicants should read this information located on
Grants.gov:
http://grants-gov.blogspot.com/2012/07/information-about-pending-
migration.html#!/2012/07/information-about-pending-migration.html

11/2013

35
Application Instructions
Electronic Application Format
Applications for grants under this competition must be submitted electronically, unless you
qualify for an exception to the electronic submission requirement in accordance with the
instructions in this application package.

In accordance with EDGAR §75.216 (b) and (c), an application will not be evaluated for funding
if the applicant does not comply with all of the procedural rules that govern the submission of the
application or the application does not contain the information required under the program.

Important note: Applications submitted to Grants.gov for the Department of Education will be
posted using Adobe forms. Therefore, applicants will need to download the latest version of
Adobe reader (at least Adobe Reader 8.1.2).

Information on computer and operating system compatibility with Adobe and links to download
the latest version is available on Grants.gov. Also, please review the Submitting Applications
with Adobe Reader Software and Education Submission Procedures and Tips for
Applicants forms found within this package for further information and guidance related to this
requirement.

We strongly recommend that you review these details on www.Grants.gov before completing
and submitting your application. In addition, applicants should submit their application a day or
two in advance of the closing date as detailed below. Applicants will no longer need to use the
PureEdge software to create or submit an application. If you have any questions regarding this
matter, please email the Grants.gov Contact Center at support@grants.gov or call 1-800-518-
4726.

Note: Please do not attach any narratives, supporting files, or application components to
any forms unless it is specifically required by the instructions for the individual section of
the application. Although several forms accept attachments, the Department of Education
will only review materials/files attached in accordance with the instructions provided
within this application package.

36
Electronic Application Submission Checklist
It is recommended that your electronic application be organized in the following manner and
include the following parts in order to expedite the review process. Instructions for all parts and
forms of the application are found either on the following pages of the application package or
individually for each form on Grants.gov.
Review your electronic application to ensure you have completed the following forms and
sections:
Part 1: Preliminary Documents
❑ Table of Contents
❑ Application for Federal Assistance (form SF 424)
❑ ED Supplemental Information for SF 424
Part 2: Budget Information
❑ ED Budget Information Non-Construction Programs (ED Form 524)
Part 3: ED Abstract Form
❑ Project Abstract
Part 4: Project Narrative Attachment Form
❑ Application Narrative
Part 5: Budget Narrative Attachment Form
❑ Budget Narrative
Part 6: Other Attachments Form
❑ Individual Resumes for Project Directors & Key Personnel
❑ Letter of Support for Promise Zone Priority (If applicant applies under this priority)
❑ Executive Order 12372 Transmittal Letter (If State Participates – refer to page 60)
❑ Indirect Cost Rate Agreement
Part 7: Assurances and Certifications
❑ Assurances for Non-Construction Programs (SF 424B Form)
❑ Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (Standard Form LLL)
❑ Grants.gov Lobbying Form
❑ General Education Provisions Act (GEPA) Requirements – Section 427 (ED GEPA427
form)

Part 8: Intergovernmental Review (Executive Order 12372)

❑ State Single Point of Contact (SPOC) List

37
Part 1: Preliminary Documents
❑ Application for Federal Assistance (Form SF 424)
❑ ED Supplemental Information for SF 424
These forms require basic identifying information about the applicant and the application. Please
provide all requested applicant information (including name, address, e-mail address and DUNS
number).

When applying electronically via Grants.gov, you will need to ensure that the DUNS
number you enter on your application is the same as the DUNS number your organization
used when it registered with the System for Award Management.

Applicants are advised to complete the Application for Federal Assistance (Form SF 424) first.
Grants.gov will automatically insert the correct CFDA and program name automatically
wherever needed on other forms.

NOTE: Please do not attach any narratives, supporting files, or application components to the
Standard Form (SF 424). Although this form accepts attachments, the Department of Education
will only review materials/files attached in accordance with the instructions provided within this
application.

38
INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE SF-424

This is a standard form required for use as a cover sheet for submission of pre-applications and applications and related information under
discretionary programs. Some of the items are required and some are optional at the discretion of the applicant or the federal agency (agency).
Required fields on the form are identified with an asterisk (*) and are also specified as “Required” in the instructions below. In addition to these
instructions, applicants must consult agency instructions to determine other specific requirements.

Item Entry: Item: Entry:

1. Type of Submission: (Required) Select one type of 10. Name Of Federal Agency: (Required) Enter the name of the
submission in accordance with agency instructions. federal agency from which assistance is being requested with
• Pre-application this application.
• Application
• Changed/Corrected Application – Check if this submission 11. Catalog Of Federal Domestic Assistance Number/Title:
is to change or correct a previously submitted application. Enter the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance number and
Unless requested by the agency, applicants may not use this title of the program under which assistance is requested, as
form to submit changes after the closing date. found in the program announcement, if applicable.
2. Type of Application: (Required) Select one type of 12. Funding Opportunity Number/Title: (Required) Enter the
application in accordance with agency instructions. Funding Opportunity Number (FON) and title of the opportunity
under which assistance is requested, as found in the program
• New – An application that is being submitted to an agency announcement.
for the first time.
• Continuation - An extension for an additional funding/budget 13. Competition Identification Number/Title: Enter the
period for a project with a projected completion date. This competition identification number and title of the competition
can include renewals. under which assistance is requested, if applicable.
• Revision - Any change in the federal government’s financial
obligation or contingent liability from an existing obligation. If
a revision, enter the appropriate letter(s). More than one may 14. Areas Affected By Project: This data element is intended for
be selected. If "Other" is selected, please specify in text box use only by programs for which the area(s) affected are likely
provided. to be different than the place(s) of performance reported on the
SF-424 Project/Performance Site Location(s) Form. Add
A. Increase Award D. Decrease Duration attachment to enter additional areas, if needed.
B. Decrease Award E. Other (specify)
C. Increase Duration
3. Date Received: Leave this field blank. This date will be 15. Descriptive Title of Applicant’s Project: (Required) Enter a
assigned by the Federal agency. brief descriptive title of the project. If appropriate, attach a map
showing project location (e.g., construction or real property
projects). For pre-applications, attach a summary description
of the project.
4. Applicant Identifier: Enter the entity identifier assigned buy
the Federal agency, if any, or the applicant’s control number
if applicable.
5a. Federal Entity Identifier: Enter the number assigned to your 16. Congressional Districts Of: 16a. (Required) Enter the
organization by the federal agency, if any. applicant’s congressional district. 16b. Enter all district(s)
5b. Federal Award Identifier: For new applications, enter NA. affected by the program or project. Enter in the format: 2
For a continuation or revision to an existing award, enter the characters state abbreviation – 3 characters district number,
previously assigned federal award identifier number. If a e.g., CA-005 for California 5th district, CA-012 for California 12
changed/corrected application, enter the federal identifier in district, NC-103 for North Carolina’s 103 district. If all
accordance with agency instructions. congressional districts in a state are affected, enter “all” for the
6. Date Received by State: Leave this field blank. This date district number, e.g., MD-all for all congressional districts in
will be assigned by the state, if applicable. Maryland. If nationwide, i.e. all districts within all states are
7. State Application Identifier: Leave this field blank. This affected, enter US-all. If the program/project is outside the US,
identifier will be assigned by the state, if applicable. enter 00-000. This optional data element is intended for use
8. Applicant Information: Enter the following in accordance only by programs for which the area(s) affected are likely to be
with agency instructions: different than place(s) of performance reported on the SF-424
Project/Performance Site Location(s) Form. Attach an
additional list of program/project congressional districts, if
needed.
a. Legal Name: (Required) Enter the legal name of applicant 17. Proposed Project Start and End Dates: (Required) Enter the
that will undertake the assistance activity. This is the proposed start date and end date of the project.
organization that has registered with the Central Contractor
Registry (CCR). Information on registering with CCR may be
obtained by visiting www.Grants.gov.
b. Employer/Taxpayer Number (EIN/TIN): (Required) Enter 18. Estimated Funding: (Required) Enter the amount requested,
the employer or taxpayer identification number (EIN or TIN) or to be contributed during the first funding/budget period by
as assigned by the Internal Revenue Service. If your each contributor. Value of in-kind contributions should be
organization is not in the US, enter 44-4444444. included on appropriate lines, as applicable. If the action will
result in a dollar change to an existing award, indicate only the

39
Item Entry: Item: Entry:
amount of the change. For decreases, enclose the amounts in
parentheses.

c. Organizational DUNS: (Required) Enter the 19. Is Application Subject to Review by State Under Executive
organization’s DUNS or DUNS+4 number received from Dun Order 12372 Process? (Required) Applicants should contact
and Bradstreet. Information on obtaining a DUNS number the State Single Point of Contact (SPOC) for Federal
may be obtained by visiting www.Grants.gov. Executive Order 12372 to determine whether the application is
subject to the State intergovernmental review process. Select
the appropriate box. If “a.” is selected, enter the date the
application was submitted to the State.
d. Address: Enter address: Street 1 (Required); city 20. Is the Applicant Delinquent on any Federal Debt?
(Required); County/Parish, State (Required if country is US), (Required) Select the appropriate box. This question applies to
Province, Country (Required), 9-digit zip/postal code the applicant organization, not the person who signs as the
(Required if country US). authorized representative. Categories of federal debt include;
but, may not be limited to: delinquent audit disallowances,
loans and taxes. If yes, include an explanation in an
attachment.
e. Organizational Unit: Enter the name of the primary 21. Authorized Representative: To be signed and dated by the
organizational unit, department or division that will undertake authorized representative of the applicant organization. Enter
the assistance activity. the first and last name (Required); prefix, middle name, suffix.
Enter title, telephone number, email (Required); and fax
f. Name and contact information of person to be number. A copy of the governing body’s authorization for you
contacted on matters involving this application: Enter the to sign this application as the official representative must be on
first and last name (Required); prefix, middle name, suffix, file in the applicant’s office. (Certain federal agencies may
title. Enter organizational affiliation if affiliated with an require that this authorization be submitted as part of the
organization other than that in 7.a. Telephone number and application.)
email (Required); fax number.
9. Type of Applicant: (Required) Select up to three applicant
type(s) in accordance with agency instructions.
A. State Government M. Nonprofit
B. County Government N. Private Institution of
C. City or Township Higher Education
Government O. Individual
D. Special District P. For-Profit
Government Organization (Other
E. Regional Organization than Small Business)
F. U.S. Territory or Q. Small Business
Possession R. Hispanic-serving
G. Independent School Institution
District S. Historically Black
H. Public/State Colleges and
Controlled Institution of Universities (HBCUs)
Higher Education T. Tribally Controlled
I. Indian/Native Colleges and
American Tribal Universities (TCCUs)
Government (Federally U. Alaska Native and
Recognized) Native Hawaiian
J. Indian/Native Serving Institutions
American Tribal V. Non-US Entity
Government (Other W. Other (specify)
than Federally
Recognized)
K. Indian/Native
American Tribally
Designated
Organization
L. Public/Indian Housing
Authority

[U.S Department of Education note: As of spring, 2010, the FON discussed in Block 12 of the instructions can be found via the
following URL: http://www.grants.gov/applicants/find_grant_opportunities.jsp.]

40
 Instructions for U.S. Department of Education
Supplemental Information for the SF-424

1. Project Director. Name, address, telephone and fax numbers, and e-mail address of the person to be contacted on matters involving this
application. Items marked with an asterisk (*) are mandatory.

2. Novice Applicant. Check “Yes” if you meet the definition for novice applicants specified in the regulations in 34 CFR 75.225 and included
on the attached page entitled “Definitions for U.S. Department of Education Supplemental Information for the SF-424”). By checking “Yes”
the applicant certifies that it meets these novice applicant requirements. Check “No” if you do not meet the definition for novice applicants.

This novice applicant information will be used by ED to: 1) determine the amount and type of technical assistance that a novice might need, if
funded, and 2) determine novice applicant eligibility in discretionary grant competitions that give special consideration to novice applications.
Certain ED discretionary grant programs give special consideration to novice applications, either by establishing a special competition for
novice applicants or by giving competitive preference to novice applicants under the procedures in 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2). If special
consideration is being given to novice applications under a particular discretionary grant competition, the application notice for the competition
published in the Federal Register will specify this information

3. Human Subjects Research. (See I. A. “Definitions” in attached page entitled “Definitions for U.S. Department of Education Supplemental
Information for the SF-424.”)

3a. If Not Human Subjects Research. Check “No” if research activities involving human subjects are not planned at any time during the
proposed project period. The remaining parts of Item 3 are then not applicable.

3a. If Human Subjects Research. Check “Yes” if research activities involving human subjects are planned at any time during the proposed
project period, either at the applicant organization or at any other performance site or collaborating institution. Check “Yes” even if the
research is exempt from the regulations for the protection of human subjects. (See I. B. “Exemptions” in attached page entitled “Definitions for
U.S. Department of Education Supplemental Information for SF-424.”)

3b. If Human Subjects Research is Exempt from the Human Subjects Regulations. Check “Yes” if all the research activities proposed are
designated to be exempt from the regulations. Check the exemption number(s) corresponding to one or more of the six exemption categories
listed in I. B. “Exemptions.” In addition, follow the instructions in II. A. “Exempt Research Narrative” in the attached page entitled
“Definitions for U.S. Department of Education Supplemental Information for the SF-424.”

3b. If Human Subjects Research is Not Exempt from Human Subjects Regulations. Check “No” if some or all of the planned research
activities are covered (not exempt). In addition, follow the instructions in II. B. “Nonexempt Research Narrative” in the attached page entitled
“Definitions for U.S. Department of Education Supplemental Information for the SF-424.”

3b. Human Subjects Assurance Number. If the applicant has an approved Federal Wide Assurance (FWA) on file with the Office for
Human Research Protections (OHRP), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, that covers the specific activity, insert the number in
the space provided. (A list of current FWAs is available at: http://ohrp.cit.nih.gov/search/asearch.asp#ASUR) If the applicant does
not have an approved assurance on file with OHRP, enter “None.” In this case, the applicant, by signature on the SF-424, is declaring that it
will comply with 34 CFR 97 and proceed to obtain the human subjects assurance upon request by the designated ED official. If the application
is recommended/selected for funding, the designated ED official will request that the applicant obtain the assurance within 30 days after the
specific formal request.

3c. If applicable, please attach your “Exempt Research” or “Nonexempt Research” narrative to your submission of the U.S Department of
Education Supplemental Information for the SF-424 form as instructed in item II, “Instructions for Exempt and Nonexempt Human Subjects
Research Narratives” in the attached page entitled “Definitions for U.S. Department of Education Supplemental Information for the SF-424.”

Note about Institutional Review Board Approval. ED does not require certification of Institutional Review Board approval with the
application. However, if an application that involves non-exempt human subjects research is recommended/selected for funding, the designated
ED official will request that the applicant obtain and send the certification to ED within 30 days after the formal request.
No covered human subjects research can be conducted until the study has ED clearance for protection of human
subjects in research.

Paperwork Burden Statement. According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of
information unless such collection displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is
1894-0007. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average between 15 and 45 minutes per response,
including the time to review instructions, search existing data resources, gather the data needed and complete and review the information
collection. If you have any comments concerning the accuracy of the estimate(s) or suggestions for improving this form, please write to: U.S.
Department of Education, Washington, D.C. 20202-0170. If you have comments or concerns regarding the status of your individual submission
of this form write directly to: (insert program office), U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20202.

41
 Definitions for U.S. Department of Education
Supplemental Information for the SF-424

Definitions: —Human Subject

Novice Applicant (See 34 CFR 75.225) The regulations define human subject as “a living individual
about whom an investigator (whether professional or student)
For discretionary grant programs, novice applicant means any conducting research obtains (1) data through intervention or
applicant for a grant from ED that— interaction with the individual, or (2) identifiable private
information.” (1) If an activity involves obtaining information
• Has never received a grant or subgrant under the about a living person by manipulating that person or that
program from which it seeks funding; person’s environment, as might occur when a new instructional
technique is tested, or by communicating or interacting with the
• Has never been a member of a group application, individual, as occurs with surveys and interviews, the definition
submitted in accordance with 34 CFR 75.127-75.129, of human subject is met. (2) If an activity involves obtaining
that received a grant under the program from which it private information about a living person in such a way that the
seeks funding; and information can be directly or indirectly linked to that
individual, the definition of human subject is met [Private
• Has not had an active discretionary grant from the information includes information about behavior that occurs in a
Federal government in the five years before the context in which an individual can reasonably expect that no
deadline date for applications under the program. For observation or recording is taking place, and information which
the purposes of this requirement, a grant is active until has been provided for specific purposes by an individual and
the end of the grant’s project or funding period, which the individual can reasonably expect will not be made
including any extensions of those periods that extend public (for example, a school health record).]
the grantee’s authority to obligate funds.
B. Exemptions.
In the case of a group application submitted in accordance with
34 CFR 75.127-75.129, a group includes only parties that meet Research activities in which the only involvement of human
the requirements listed above. subjects will be in one or more of the following six categories of
exemptions are not covered by the regulations:

PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS IN RESEARCH (1) Research conducted in established or commonly accepted
educational settings, involving normal educational practices,
such as (a) research on regular and special education
I. Definitions and Exemptions
instructional strategies, or (b) research on the effectiveness of or
the comparison among instructional techniques, curricula, or
A. Definitions.
classroom management methods. If an educational practice is
being introduced to the site and is not widely used for similar
A research activity involves human subjects if the activity is
populations, it is not covered by this exemption.
research, as defined in the Department’s regulations, and the
research activity will involve use of human subjects, as defined
(2) Research involving the use of educational tests (cognitive,
in the regulations.
diagnostic, aptitude, achievement), survey procedures, interview
procedures or observation of public behavior, unless: (a)
—Research information obtained is recorded in such a manner that human
subjects can be identified, directly or through identifiers linked
The ED Regulations for the Protection of Human Subjects, Title to the subjects; and (b) any disclosure of the human subjects’
34, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 97, define research as “a responses outside the research could reasonably place the
systematic investigation, including research development, subjects at risk of criminal or civil liability or be damaging to
testing and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to the subjects’ financial standing, employability, or reputation. If
generalizable knowledge. Activities which meet this definition the subjects are children, exemption 2 applies only to research
constitute research whether or not they are conducted or involving educational tests and observations of public behavior
supported under a program that is considered research for other when the investigator(s) do not participate in the activities
purposes. For example, some demonstration and service being observed.
programs may include research activities.
Exemption 2 does not apply if children are surveyed or
interviewed or if the research involves observation of public
behavior and the investigator(s) participate in the activities
being observed. [Children are defined as persons who have not
attained the legal age for consent to treatments or procedures
42
involved in the research, under the applicable law or jurisdiction more than one narrative, be sure to label each set of responses as
in which the research will be conducted.] to the project they address.

(3) Research involving the use of educational tests (cognitive,

diagnostic, aptitude, achievement), survey procedures, interview
procedures or observation of public behavior that is not exempt A. Exempt Research Narrative.
under section (2) above, if the human subjects are elected or If you marked “Yes” for item 3.b. and designated exemption
appointed public officials or candidates for public office; or numbers(s), attach the “exempt research” narrative to the U.S.
federal statute(s) require(s) without exception that the Department of Education Supplemental Information for the SF-
confidentiality of the personally identifiable information will be 424. The narrative must contain sufficient information about the
maintained throughout the research and thereafter. involvement of human subjects in the proposed research to
allow a determination by ED that the designated exemption(s)
(4) Research involving the collection or study of existing data, are appropriate. The narrative must be succinct.
documents, records, pathological specimens, or diagnostic
specimens, if these sources are publicly available or if the B. Nonexempt Research Narrative.
information is recorded by the investigator in a manner that If you marked “No” for item 3.b. you must attach the
subjects cannot be identified, directly or through identifiers “nonexempt research” narrative to the U.S. Department of
linked to the subjects. [This exemption applies only to Education Supplemental Information for the SF-424. The
retrospective studies using data collected before the initiation narrative must address the following seven points. Although no
of the research.] specific page limitation applies to this section of the application,
be succinct.

(5) Research and demonstration projects which are conducted (1) Human Subjects Involvement and Characteristics:
by or subject to the approval of department or agency heads, and Provide a detailed description of the proposed involvement of
which are designed to study, evaluate, or otherwise examine: human subjects. Describe the characteristics of the subject
(a) public benefit or service programs; (b) procedures for population, including their anticipated number, age range, and
obtaining benefits or services under those programs; (c) possible health status. Identify the criteria for inclusion or exclusion of
changes in or alternatives to those programs or procedures; or any subpopulation. Explain the rationale for the involvement of
(d) possible changes in methods or levels of payment for special classes of subjects, such as children, children with
benefits or services under those programs. [The standards of disabilities, adults with disabilities, persons with mental
this exemption are rarely met because it was designed to apply disabilities, pregnant women, prisoners, institutionalized
only to specific research conducted by HHS at the time the individuals, or others who are likely to be vulnerable
regulations were established. We will strictly construe this
exemption because it was not intended to apply to ED (2) Sources of Materials: Identify the sources of research
research.] material obtained from individually identifiable living human
subjects in the form of specimens, records, or data. Indicate
whether the material or data will be obtained specifically for
(6) Taste and food quality evaluation and consumer acceptance research purposes or whether use will be made of existing
studies, (a) if wholesome foods without additives are consumed specimens, records, or data.
or (b) if a food is consumed that contains a food ingredient at or
below the level and for a use found to be safe, or agricultural (3) Recruitment and Informed Consent: Describe plans for
chemical or environmental contaminant at or below the level the recruitment of subjects and the consent procedures to be
found to be safe, by the Food and Drug Administration or followed. Include the circumstances under which consent will
approved by the Environmental Protection Agency or the Food be sought and obtained, who will seek it, the nature of the
Safety and Inspection Service of the U.S. Department of information to be provided to prospective subjects, and the
Agriculture. method of documenting consent. State if the Institutional
Review Board (IRB) has authorized a modification or waiver of
II. Instructions for Exempt and Nonexempt Human the elements of consent or the requirement for documentation of
Subjects Research Narratives consent.

If the applicant marked “Yes” for Item 3.b. of the U.S. (4) Potential Risks: Describe potential risks (physical,
Department of Education Supplemental Information for the SF psychological, social, legal, or other) and assess their likelihood
424, the applicant must attach a human subjects “exempt and seriousness. Where appropriate, describe alternative
research” or “nonexempt research” narrative to the U.S. treatments and procedures that might be advantageous to the
Department of Education Supplemental Information for the SF- subjects.
424 form. If you have multiple projects and need to provide

43
(5) Protection Against Risk: Describe the procedures for
protecting against or minimizing potential risks, including risks
to confidentiality, and assess their likely effectiveness. Where
appropriate, discuss provisions for ensuring necessary medical
or professional intervention in the event of adverse effects to the
subjects. Also, where appropriate, describe the provisions for
monitoring the data collected to ensure the safety of the
subjects.

(6) Importance of the Knowledge to be Gained: Discuss the

importance of the knowledge gained or to be gained as a result
of the proposed research. Discuss why the risks to subjects are
reasonable in relation to the anticipated benefits to subjects and
in relation to the importance of the knowledge that may
reasonably be expected to result.

(7) Collaborating Site(s): If research involving human subjects

will take place at collaborating site(s) or other performance
site(s), name the sites and briefly describe their involvement or
role in the research.

Copies of the Department of Education’s Regulations for the

Protection of Human Subjects, 34 CFR Part 97 and other
pertinent materials on the protection of human subjects in
research are available from the Office of the Chief Financial
Officer, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C.
20202-4331, telephone: (202) 245-8090, and on the U.S.
Department of Education’s Protection of Human Subjects in
Research Web Site:
http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocfo/humansub.html

NOTE: The State Applicant Identifier on the SF-424 is for

State Use only. Please complete it on the SF-424 in the upper
right corner of the form (if applicable).

44
Part 2: Budget Information
❑ ED Budget Information Non-Construction Programs (ED Form 524)
This part of your application contains information about the Federal funding you are requesting.
Remember that you must provide all requested budget information for each year of the project
(up to 60 months) and the total column in order to be considered for Federal funding. Specific
instructions for completing the budget forms are provided within this application package.

Instructions for completing ED Form 524 Section A:

Name of Institution/Organization: Enter the name of the applicant in the space provided.

Personnel (Line 1): Enter project personnel salaries and wages only. Include fees and expenses
for consultants on Line 6.

Fringe Benefits (Line 2): The institution’s normal fringe benefits contribution may be charged to
the program. Leave this line blank if fringe benefits applicable to direct salaries and wages are
treated as part of the indirect cost.

Travel (Line 3): Indicate the travel costs of employees and participants only. Include travel of
persons such as consultants on Line 6.

Equipment (Line 4): Indicate the cost of tangible, non-expendable personal property that has a
usefulness greater than one year and acquisition costs that are the lesser of the capitalization
level established by the applicant entity for financial statement purposes or $5,000 per article.
Lower limits may be established to maintain consistency with the applicant’s policy.

Supplies (Line 5): Show all tangible, expendable personal property. Direct supplies and
materials differ from equipment in that they are consumable, expendable, and of a relatively low
unit cost. Supplies purchased with grant funds should directly benefit the grant project and be
necessary for achieving the goals of the project.

Contractual (Line 6): The contractual category should include all costs specifically incurred with
actions that the applicant takes in conjunction with an established internal procurement system.
Include consultant fees, expenses, and travel costs in this category if the consultant’s services are
obtained through a written binding agreement or contract.

Construction (Line 7): Not applicable.

Other (Line 8): Indicate all direct costs not covered on Lines 1-6. For example, include costs
such as space rental, required fees, honoraria and travel (where a contract is not in place for
services), training, and communication and printing costs. Do not include costs that are included
in the indirect cost rate.

Total Direct Costs (Line 9): The sum of Lines 1-8.

45
Indirect Costs (Line 10): Indicate the applicant’s approved indirect cost rate, per sections 75.560
– 75.564 of EDGAR. If an applicant does not have an approved indirect cost rate agreement
with a cognizant Federal agency, the applicant must apply to the Department for a temporary
indirect cost rate if it wishes to charge indirect costs to the grant. For more information, go to the
Department's website at: http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocfo/fipao/icgindex.html.

Training Stipends (Line 11): This line item is not applicable to this program. The training
stipend line item only pertains to costs associated with long term training programs and college
or university coursework, not workshops or short-term training supported by this program.
Salary stipends paid to teachers and other school personnel for participating in short-term
professional development should be reported in Personnel (line 1).

Total Cost (Line 12): This should equal to sum of Lines 9-11 (total direct costs + indirect +
stipends). The sum for column one, labeled Project Year 1 (a), should also be equal to item 15a
on the application cover sheet (SF Form 424).

46
 Instructions for ED 524

General Instructions restricted indirect cost rate that is included on your approved Indirect Cost governmental entities, and 80.24, applicable to governments, and
Rate Agreement or whether you are using a restricted indirect cost rate that the applicable Office of Management and Budget (OMB) cost
This form is used to apply to individual U.S. Department of Education complies with 34 CFR 76.564(c)(2). Note: State or Local government principles for your entity type regarding donations, capital assets,
(ED) discretionary grant programs. Unless directed otherwise, provide the agencies may not use the provision for a restricted indirect cost rate specified depreciation and use allowances. OMB cost principle circulars are
same budget information for each year of the multi-year funding request. in 34 CFR 76.564(c)(2). Check only one response. Leave blank, if this item is available on OMB’s website at:
Pay attention to applicable program specific instructions, if attached. You not applicable. http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/index.html]
may access the Education Department General Administrative
Regulations, 34 CFR 74 – 86 and 97-99, on ED’s website at: Section B - Budget Summary 3. If applicable to this program, provide the rate and base on which
http://www.ed.gov/policy/fund/reg/edgarReg/edgar.html Non-Federal Funds fringe benefits are calculated.

You must consult with your Business Office prior to submitting this If you are required to provide or volunteer to provide cost-sharing or matching 4. If you are requesting reimbursement for indirect costs on line 10,
form. funds or other non-Federal resources to the project, these should be shown for this information is to be completed by your Business Office.
each applicable budget category on lines 1-11 of Section B. Specify the estimated amount of the base to which the indirect cost
Section A - Budget Summary rate is applied and the total indirect expense. Depending on the
U.S. Department of Education Funds Lines 1-11, columns (a)-(e): For each project year, for which matching funds grant program to which you are applying and/or your approved
or other contributions are provided, show the total contribution for each Indirect Cost Rate Agreement, some direct cost budget categories
All applicants must complete Section A and provide a break-down by the applicable budget category. in your grant application budget may not be included in the base
applicable budget categories shown in lines 1-11. and multiplied by your indirect cost rate. For example, you must
Lines 1-11, column (f): Show the multi-year total for each budget category. multiply the indirect cost rates Training grants" (34 CFR 75.562)
Lines 1-11, columns (a)-(e): For each project year for which funding is If non-Federal contributions are provided for only one year, leave this column and grants under programs with “Supplement not Supplant”
requested, show the total amount requested for each applicable budget blank. requirements ("Restricted Rate" programs) by a “modified total
category. direct cost” (MTDC) base (34 CFR 75.563 or 76.563). Please
Line 12, columns (a)-(e): Show the total matching or other contribution for indicate which costs are included and which costs are excluded
Lines 1-11, column (f): Show the multi-year total for each budget each project year. from the base to which the indirect cost rate is applied.
category. If funding is requested for only one project year, leave this
column blank. Line 12, column (f): Show the total amount to be contributed for all years of When calculating indirect costs (line 10) for "Training grants" or
the multi-year project. If non-Federal contributions are provided for only one grants under "Restricted Rate" programs, you must refer to the
Line 12, columns (a)-(e): Show the total budget request for each project year, leave this space blank. information and examples on ED’s website at:
year for which funding is requested. http://www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.
Section C - Budget Narrative [Attach separate sheet(s)]
Line 12, column (f): Show the total amount requested for all project years. Pay attention to applicable program specific instructions, You may also contact (202) 377-3838 for additional information
If funding is requested for only one year, leave this space blank. if attached. regarding calculating indirect cost rates or general indirect cost rate
information.
1. Provide an itemized budget breakdown, and justification by project
Indirect Cost Information: If you are requesting reimbursement for indirect year, for each budget category listed in Sections A and B. For grant
costs on line 10, this information is to be completed by your Business projects that will be divided into two or more separately budgeted major 5. Provide other explanations or comments you deem necessary.
Office. (1): Indicate whether or not your organization has an Indirect Cost activities or sub-projects, show for each budget category of a project
Rate Agreement that was approved by the Federal government. year the breakdown of the specific expenses attributable to each sub- Paperwork Burden Statement
If you checked “no,” ED generally will authorize grantees to use a project or activity.
temporary rate of 10 percent of budgeted salaries and wages subject to the According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are
following limitations: required to respond to a collection of information unless such collection
(a) The grantee must submit an indirect cost proposal to its 2. For non-Federal funds or resources listed in Section B that are used to displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number
cognizant agency within 90 days after ED issues a grant award meet a cost-sharing or matching requirement or provided as a voluntary for this information collection is 1894-0008. The time required to
notification; and cost-sharing or matching commitment, you must include: complete this information collection is estimated to vary from 13 to 22
(b) If after the 90-day period, the grantee has not submitted an hours per response, with an average of 17.5 hours per response,
indirect cost proposal to its cognizant agency, the grantee may not charge including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources,
its grant for indirect costs until it has negotiated an indirect cost rate a. The specific costs or contributions by budget category; gather the data needed, and complete and review the information
agreement with its cognizant agency. b. The source of the costs or contributions; and collection. If you have any comments concerning the accuracy of the
(2): If you checked “yes” in (1), indicate in (2) the beginning c. In the case of third-party in-kind contributions, a description of how time estimate(s) or suggestions for improving this form, please write to:
and ending dates covered by the Indirect Cost Rate Agreement. In the value was determined for the donated or contributed U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C. 20202-4537. If you
addition, indicate whether ED, another Federal agency (Other) or State goods or services. have comments or concerns regarding the status of your individual
agency issued the approved agreement. If you check “Other,” specify the submission of this form, write directly to (insert program office), U.S.
name of the Federal or other agency that issued the approved agreement. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, S.W., Washington,
(3): If you are applying for a grant under a Restricted Rate [Please review ED’s general cost sharing and matching regulations, D.C. 20202..
Program (34 CFR 75.563 or 76.563), indicate whether you are using a which include specific limitations, in 34 CFR 74.23, applicable to non-

47
Part 3: ED Abstract Form
This section should be attached as a single document to the ED Abstract Form in accordance
with the instructions found on Grants.gov and should be organized in the following manner and
include the following parts in order to expedite the review process.

Ensure that you only attach the Education approved file types detailed in the Federal Register
application notice (read-only, non-modifiable .pdf files). Also, do not upload any password-
protected files to your application.

Please note that Grants.gov cannot process an application that includes two or more files that
have the same name within a grant submission.

When attaching files, applicants should limit the size of their file names. Lengthy file names
could result in difficulties with opening and processing your application. We recommend your
file names be less than 50 characters.

❑ Project Abstract
The project abstract should not exceed one double spaced page and should include a concise
description of the following information:

• Project objectives and activities,

• Applicable priorities
• Proposed project outcomes
• Number of participants to be served

Note: Applicants may address either of the competitive preference priorities or both. An applicant
must identify in the abstract section of its application the competitive preference priority or
priorities it wishes the Department to consider. The Department will not review or award points
under any competitive preference priority for any application that fails to do so.

In addition, an applicant must describe and list by name in the application narrative the school(s)
that will be served under competitive preference priority 1, including information on how each of
those school(s) meets the definition of high-poverty school, as defined in this notice. Applicants
should submit a letter from the lead organization of a designated Promise Zone attesting to the
contribution that the proposed activities would make, and supporting the application. A list of
designated Promise Zones and lead organizations can be found at www.hud.gov/promisezones.

48
Part 4: Project Narrative Attachment Form

This section should be attached as a single document to the Project Narrative Attachment Form in
accordance with the instructions found on Grants.gov and should be organized in the following
manner and include the following parts in order to expedite the review process.

Ensure that you only attach the Education approved file types detailed in the Federal Register
application notice (read-only, non-modifiable .pdf files). Also, do not upload any password-
protected files to your application.

When attaching files, applicants should limit the size of their file names. Lengthy file names could
result in difficulties with opening and processing your application. We recommend your file names
be less than 50 characters.

❑ Table of Contents (The table of contents should cover the entire application – not just the
Project Narrative)
The Table of Contents shows where and how the important sections of your proposal are organized
and should not exceed one double spaced page.

❑ Application Narrative
The application narrative responds to the selection criteria found in this application package and
should follow the order of the selection criteria.

Applicants must limit this section of the application to the equivalent of no more than 50 double-
spaced typewritten pages and adhere to the following guidelines:

• A “page” is 8.5" x 11", on one side only, with 1" margins at the top, bottom, and both sides.
• Double space (no more than three lines per vertical inch) all text in the application narrative.
• Titles, headings, footnotes, quotations, references, and captions, as well as all text in charts,
tables, figures, and graphs can be single spaced.
• Use a font that is either 12 point or larger or no smaller than 10 pitch (characters per inch).
• Use one of the following fonts: Times New Roman, Courier, Courier New, or Arial. An
application submitted in any other font (including Times Roman or Arial Narrow) will not
be accepted.

Reviewers will not read any pages of your application that exceed the page limit.

The narrative must contain evidence that the applicant meets the absolute priorities and should
contain and follow in sequence the information requested for each selection criterion. Applicants
should ensure that the narrative addresses all of the application and program requirements listed and
that the narrative is easy to read and logically developed in accordance with the selection criteria.

49
Selection Criteria for Program Narrative
The maximum score for all selection criteria is 100 points. The points or weights assigned to each
criterion are indicated in parentheses. Non-Federal peer reviewers will review each application.
They will be asked to evaluate and score each program narrative against the following selection
criteria:

[Note: The criteria may contain weighted subcriteria. Applicants must address each subcriterion
to qualify for the maximum number of points for each criterion.]

1) Need for Project – 15 points

2) Significance – 15 points
3) Quality of the Project Design – 15 points
4) Quality of the Project Services – 25 points
5) Quality of the Management Plan – 15 points
6) Quality of the Project Evaluation – 15 points

1. Need for Project (5 points)

In determining the need for the proposed project, the following factors are considered:
A. The magnitude of the need for the services to be provided or the activities to be carried out by
the proposed project. (10 points)
B. The extent to which specific gaps or weaknesses in services, infrastructure, or opportunities
have been identified and will be addressed by the proposed project, including the nature and
magnitude of those gaps or weaknesses. (5 points)

Note: In addressing this criterion, applicants may want to consider providing the description and
information called for in Application Requirement as listed in the Notice Inviting Applications.

2. Significance (15 points)

In determining the significance of the proposed project, the following factors are considered:
A. The extent to which the proposed project is likely to build local capacity to provide, improve or
expand services that address the needs of the target population. (15 points)

Note: In addressing this criterion, applicants may want to consider providing a description of the
information called for in Application Requirements as listed in the Notice Inviting Applications.

3. Quality of the Project Design (15 points)

In determining the quality of the design of the proposed project, the following factors are
considered:
A. The extent to which the design of the proposed project is appropriate to, and will successfully
address, the needs of the target population or other identified needs. (5 points)

50
B. The extent to which the proposed project will integrate with or build on similar or related efforts
to improve relevant outcomes (as defined in 34 CFR 77.1(c)), using existing funding streams
from other programs or policies supported by community, State, and Federal resources. (5
points)
C. The extent to which the proposed project is supported by evidence of promise (as defined in 34
CFR 77.1 (c)). (5 points)

Note: In addressing this criterion, applicants may want to consider providing a description of how
the absolute priority will be met as well as the description and information called for in the
Application Requirements as listed in the Notice Inviting Applications.

4. Quality of the Project Services (25 points)

In determining the quality of the management plan of the proposed project, the following factors are
considered:

A. The quality and sufficiency of strategies for ensuring equal access and treatment for eligible
project participants who are members of groups that have traditionally been underrepresented
based on race, color, national origin, gender, age, or disability.
B. The extent to which the training or professional development services to be provided by the
proposed project are of sufficient quality, intensity, and duration to lead to improvements in
practice among the recipients of those services.

Note: Applicants should discuss in detail in the application narrative how you will be addressing the
competitive preference priority (or priorities), as part of the overall proposed project goals and
objectives in the application narrative.

5. Quality of the Management Plan (15 points)

In determining the quality of the management plan of the proposed project, the following factors are
considered:
C. The adequacy of the management plan to achieve the objectives of the proposed project on time
and within budget, including clearly defined responsibilities, timelines, and milestones for
accomplishing project tasks. (15 points)

Note: Applicants may address this criterion in any way that they want. However, the applicant
may want to consider providing a description of how the project will be structured and managed.
Applicants may also wish to consider providing information on staff roles and responsibilities.

51
 6. Quality of the Project Evaluation (15 points)

In determining the quality of the evaluation of the proposed project, the following factors are
considered:
A. The extent to which the methods of evaluation are thorough, feasible, and appropriate to the
goals, objectives, and outcomes of the proposed project. (15 points)

Note: Under this criterion, applicants must provide a description and information related to the
Project Evaluation and collection and reporting of performance information, called for in Section
VI: Award Information (Performance Measures) of the Notice Inviting Applications as well as
discussed on pages 63-67 of the application package (“Reporting and Accountability” section).

Note: If the applicant does not have experience with collection and reporting of performance data
through other projects or research, the applicant should provide other evidence of capacity to
successfully carry out data collection and reporting for its proposed project.

52
Part 5: Budget Narrative
This section should be attached as a single document to the Budget Narrative Attachment Form in
accordance with the instructions found on Grants.gov. It should be organized in the following
manner and include the following parts in order to expedite the review process.

Ensure that you only attach the Education approved file types detailed in the Federal Register
application notice (read-only, non-modifiable .pdf files). Also, do not upload any password-
protected files to your application.

When attaching files, applicants should limit the size of their file names. Lengthy file names could
result in difficulties with opening and processing your application. We recommend your file names
be less than 50 characters.

Each application must also provide a Budget Narrative (which serves to meet the requirements of
ED Form 524, Section C) for requested Federal funds. The Budget Narrative for requested Federal
funds should provide a justification of how the money requested for each budget item will be spent.

This section requires an itemized budget breakdown for each project year and the basis for
estimating the costs of personnel salaries, benefits, project staff travel, materials and supplies,
consultants and subcontracts, indirect costs and any other projected expenditures. Be sure to
complete an itemized budget breakdown and narrative for each year of the proposed project (up to
36 months).

The Budget Narrative provides an opportunity for the applicant to identify the nature and amount of
the proposed expenditures. The applicant should provide sufficient detail to enable reviewers and
project staff to understand how requested funds will be used, how much will be expended, and the
relationship between the requested funds and project activities and outcomes.

Important Notes
• Applicants are encouraged to review OMB Circular A-21, Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions (codified at 2 CFR 220); OMB Circular A-87, Cost Principles
for State, Local, and Indian Tribal Governments (codified at 2 CFR 225); or OMB
Circular A-122, Cost Principles for Nonprofit Organizations (codified at 2 CFR 230) in
preparing their budget and budget narrative.
• OMB Circular A-21 may be found at the following link:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/a021/a21_2004.html

• OMB Circular A-87 may be found at the following link:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/a087/a87_2004.html

• OMB Circular A-122 may be found at the following link:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/a122/a122_2004.html

53
Suggested Guidelines for the Budget Narrative
In accordance with 34 CFR 75.232, Department of Education staff perform a cost analysis of the
each recommended project to ensure that costs relate to the activities and objectives of the
project, are reasonable, allowable and allocable. We may delete or reduce costs from the budget
during this review.

To facilitate the review of your Budget Narrative, we encourage each applicant to include the
following information for each year of the project:

1. Personnel
• Provide the title and duties of each position to be compensated under this project.
• Provide the salary for each position under this project.
• Provide the amounts of time, such as hours or percentage of time to be expended by each
position under this project.
• Explain the importance of each position to the success of the project.
• Provide the basis for cost estimates or computations.

2. Fringe Benefits
• Give the fringe benefit percentages of all personnel included under Personnel.
• Provide the rate and base on which fringe benefits are calculated.

3. Travel
• Explain the purpose of the travel, how it relates to project success, how it aligns with the
project goals and objectives and which program participants or staff will participate.
• Submit an estimate for the number of trips, points of origin and destination, and purpose
of travel.
• Submit an itemized estimate of transportation and/or subsistence costs for each trip.
• Provide the basis for cost estimates or computations.

4. Equipment
• Indicate the estimated unit cost for each item to be purchased.
• Identify each type of equipment.
• Provide adequate justification of the need for items of equipment to be purchased.
• Explain the purpose of the equipment, and how it relates to project success.
• Provide the basis for cost estimates or computations.

5. Supplies
• Provide an itemized estimate of materials and supplies by nature of expense or general
category (e.g., instructional materials, office supplies, etc.).
• Explain the purpose of the supplies and how they relate to project success.
• Provide the basis for cost estimates or computations.

6. Contractual
• Provide the purpose and relation to project success.
• Describe the products to be acquired, and/or the professional services to be provided.
• Provide the cost per contractor.

54
 • Provide the amount of time that the project will be working with the contractor(s).
• For professional services contracts, provide the amounts of time to be devoted to the
project, including the costs to be charged to this proposed grant award.
• Provide a brief statement that you have followed the procedures for procurement under
34 CFR Parts 74.40 - 74.48 and Part 80.36.
• Provide the basis for cost estimates or computations.

7. Construction
• Not applicable.

8. Other
• List and identify items by major type or category (e.g., communications, printing,
postage, equipment rental, etc.).
• Provide the cost per item (printing = $500, postage = $750).
• Provide the purpose for the expenditures and relation to project success.
• Provide the basis for cost estimates or computations.

9. Total Direct Costs

• The amount that is the sum of expenditures, per budget category, of Lines 1-8.

10. Indirect Costs

• Identify indirect cost rate (if the applicant will charge indirect costs to the grant)
• Note: remember to provide a copy of the most recent approved indirect cost agreement
in the Other Attachments form section of the application.

11. Training Stipends

• Please provide total cost for training stipends.

12. Total Costs

• Sum total of direct costs, indirect costs, and stipends.
• Please provide total costs for each year of the project as well as grand total cost for the
entire project (up to 60 months).

55
Important Information Regarding Indirect Costs
The Department of Education (ED) reimburses a grantee for part of its indirect costs incurred in
projects funded by the Project Prevent Grant Program (CFDA 84.184M).

For this grant competition, you may charge indirect costs using the restricted negotiated rate with
your cognizant federal agency (e.g., Department of Education, Department of Health and Human
Services, Department of the Interior). Be sure to include evidence of a federally negotiated
indirect cost rate.

Note: Applicants should use the appropriate program or operations rate specified in their
institution’s federally approved indirect cost rate agreement in their proposed project budgets.
Individuals who apply for any grant competition through ED are not allowed to budget for an
indirect cost rate. If you budget for contractual services, please note that indirect costs may be
applied only to the first $25,000 of each subcontract for each year of the project.

You are encouraged to give priority to direct services to students by limiting the indirect costs
charged to the project. You will not be penalized for failure to reduce indirect costs nor will you
gain competitive advantage if you do.

If you claim indirect costs in the budget for your proposed project and do not have a negotiated
rate with the federal government, ED will establish a temporary indirect cost rate for your project
(i.e., 10 percent of the direct salaries and wages included in the budget for the project). Grantees
will be allowed to draw at the temporary rate during the first 90 days after ED made the grant, as
determined by the date of the Grant Award Notification. If a grantee does not submit an indirect
cost rate proposal to its cognizant agency within that first 90 days, the grantee will not be
allowed to draw any more funds for indirect costs until it obtains a federally recognized indirect
cost rate from its cognizant agency. For more information about indirect cost rates, visit
www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocfo/intro.html .

56
Part 6: Other Attachment Form
Attach one or more documents to the Other Attachments Form in accordance with the
instructions found on Grants.gov. You may provide all of the required information in a single
document, or in multiple documents.

Ensure that you only attach the Education approved file types detailed in the Federal Register
application notice (read-only, non-modifiable .pdf files). Also, do not upload any password-
protected files to your application.

Please note that Grants.gov cannot process an application that includes two or more files that
have the same name within a grant submission.

When attaching files, applicants should limit the size of their file names. Lengthy file names
could result in difficulties with opening and processing your application. We recommend your
file names be less than 50 characters.

❑ Individual Resumes for Project Directors and Key Personnel: Provide brief resumes or
job descriptions that describe their qualifications for the responsibilities they will carry out
under the project.

❑ Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) or Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with a

Local Mental Health Agency: If an applicant applies under competitive preference priority
1, attach the MOA or MOU in this section.

❑ Executive Order 12372: You must attach a copy of the Single Point of Contact transmittal
letter.

❑ Indirect Cost Rate Agreement: You must attach a copy of the indirect cost rate agreement.

57
Part 7: Assurances and Certifications

Be certain to complete all required assurances and certifications in Grants.gov, and include all required
information in the appropriate place on each form. The assurances and certifications required for this
application are:

❑ Assurances for Non-Construction Programs (SF 424B Form)

❑ Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (SF LLL Form)
❑ Certification Regarding Lobbying (ED 80-0013 Form)
❑ General Education Provisions Act (GEPA) Requirements – Section 427

58
 INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETION OF SF-LLL, DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES

This disclosure form shall be completed by the reporting entity, whether subawardee or prime Federal recipient, at the initiation or
receipt of a covered Federal action, or a material change to a previous filing, pursuant to title 31 U.S.C. section 1352. The filing of a
form is required for each payment or agreement to make payment to any lobbying entity for influencing or attempting to influence an
officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of
Congress in connection with a covered Federal action. Complete all items that apply for both the initial filing and material change
report. Refer to the implementing guidance published by the Office of Management and Budget for additional information.

1. Identify the type of covered Federal action for which lobbying activity is and/or has been secured to influence the outcome of
a covered Federal action.

2. Identify the status of the covered Federal action.

3. Identify the appropriate classification of this report. If this is a follow-up report caused by a material change to the
information previously reported, enter the year and quarter in which the change occurred. Enter the date of the last
previously submitted report by this reporting entity for this covered Federal action.

4. Enter the full name, address, city, State and zip code of the reporting entity. Include Congressional District, if known. Check
the appropriate classification of the reporting entity that designates if it is, or expects to be, a prime or subaward recipient.
Identify the tier of the subawardee, e.g., the first subawardee of the prime is the 1st tier. Subawards include but are not
limited to subcontracts, subgrants and contract awards under grants.

5. If the organization filing the report in item 4 checks “Subawardee,” then enter the full name, address, city, State and zip code
of the prime Federal recipient. Include Congressional District, if known.

6. Enter the name of the federal agency making the award or loan commitment. Include at least one organizational level below
agency name, if known. For example, Department of Transportation, United States Coast Guard.

7. Enter the Federal program name or description for the covered Federal action (item 1). If known, enter the full Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number for grants, cooperative agreements, loans, and loan commitments.

8. Enter the most appropriate Federal identifying number available for the Federal action identified in item 1 (e.g., Request for
Proposal (RFP) number; Invitations for Bid (IFB) number; grant announcement number; the contract, grant, or loan award
number; the application/proposal control number assigned by the Federal agency). Included prefixes, e.g., “RFP-DE-90-
001.”

9. For a covered Federal action where there has been an award or loan commitment by the Federal agency, enter the Federal
amount of the award/loan commitment for the prime entity identified in item 4 or 5.

10. (a) Enter the full name, address, city, State and zip code of the lobbying registrant under the Lobbying Disclosure Act of
1995 engaged by the reporting entity identified in item 4 to influence the covered Federal action.

(b) Enter the full names of the individual(s) performing services, and include full address if different from 10(a). Enter Last
Name, First Name, and Middle Initial (MI).

11. The certifying official shall sign and date the form, print his/her name, title, and telephone number.

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act, as amended, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid
OMB control Number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is OMB No. 0348-0046. Public reporting burden for this
collection of information is estimated to average 10 minutes per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding the burden
estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the Office of Management and
Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0348-0046), Washington, DC 20503

59
Instructions for Meeting the General Education Provisions Act (GEPA)
Section 427 Requirements
All applicants for new awards must include information in their applications to address this new
provision in order to receive funding under this program.

Section 427 requires each applicant for funds (other than an individual person) to include in its
application a description of the steps the applicant proposes to take to ensure equitable access to,
and participation in, its Federally assisted program for students, teachers, and other program
beneficiaries with special needs.

This provision allows applicants discretion in developing the required description. The statute
highlights six types of barriers that can impede equitable access or participation: gender, race,
national origin, color, disability, or age.

A general statement of an applicant’s nondiscriminatory hiring policy is not sufficient to meet

this requirement. Applicants must identify potential barriers and explain steps they will take to
overcome these barriers.

Please review the Notice to all Applicants (included in the electronic application package in
Grants.gov) for further information on meeting the provisions in the Department of Education's
General Education Provisions Act (GEPA).

Applicants are required to address this provision by attaching a statement (not to exceed three
pages) to the ED GEPA427 form that is included in the electronic application package in
Grants.gov.

60
Part 8: Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs (Executive Order
12372)

This program falls under the rubric of Executive Order 12372 (Intergovernmental Review of
Federal Programs) and the regulations in 34 CFR Part 79. One of the objectives of the Executive
order is to strengthen federalism--or the distribution of responsibility between localities, States,
and the Federal government--by fostering intergovernmental partnerships. This idea includes
supporting processes that State or local governments have devised for coordinating and
reviewing proposed Federal financial grant applications.

The process for doing this requires grant applicants to contact State Single Points of Contact for
information on how this works. Multi-state applicants should follow procedures specific to each
state.

Further information about the State Single Point of Contact (SPOC) process and a list of names
by State can be found at:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants_spoc

Absent specific State review programs, applicants may submit comments directly to the
Department. All recommendations and comments must be mailed or hand-delivered by the date
indicated in the actual application notice to the following address: The Secretary, EO 12372--
CFDA# 84.215E, U.S. Department of Education, room 7E200. 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20202.

Proof of mailing will be determined on the same basis as applications (see 34 CFR §75.102).
Recommendations or comments may be hand-delivered until 4:30 p.m. (eastern time) on the
closing date indicated in this notice.

Important note: The above address is not the same address as the one to which the applicant
submits its completed applications. Do not send applications to the above address.

Not all states have chosen to participate in the intergovernmental review process, and therefore
do not have a SPOC. If you are located in a State that does not have a SPOC, you may send
application materials directly to the Department as described in the Federal Register notice.

61
Reporting and Accountability

Successful Applicants with multi-year grants must submit an annual performance report
demonstrating their progress in meeting approved project objectives. Grantees must also provide
the most current financial and performance measure data for each year of the project.

At the end of the project period, applicants will also be required to submit a final performance
report.

Under the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA), performance measures have been
established to evaluate the overall effectiveness of the Project Prevent Grant Program.

The GPRA measures for this program are:

(1) The percentage of grantees that report a measurable decrease in violent, aggressive,
and disruptive behavior in schools served by the grant.
(2) The percentage of grantees that report a measurable increase in the number of
students in schools served by the grant receiving school-based and community
mental health services to address student needs resulting from exposure to violence.
(3) The percentage of grantees that report a measurable increase in the school
engagement (as defined in the Notice Inviting Applications) of students served by
the grant.
(4) The percentage of grantees that report a measurable increase in the quality of
family engagement and grantee engagement with community-based organization(s),
as defined and measured by the grantee.

These GPRA measures constitute the Department’s indicators of success for this program.
Consequently, applicants for a grant under this program should give careful consideration to
these measures in developing their projects, and particularly to how they will collect and report
data for these measures. Grantees will be expected to collect and report data to the Department in
their annual performance report and final performance reports
(www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/ed524b_coverfill.pdf and
www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/ed524b_statusfill.pdf).

We will aggregate data provided by grantees for these GPRA measures and use these data for a
variety of purposes, including developing future budget proposals and improving the
performance of the program. We also will share this performance data with Congress and may
publish results from individual grants to illustrate how grant sites are making progress toward
program objectives.

The Department has established project performance measures for assessing the effectiveness of
the Project Prevent Grant Program.

The project performance measures for this program are:

62
 (1) Annual decrease in violent, aggressive, and disruptive behavior in schools served by
the grant.
(2) Annual increase in the number of students in schools served by the grant receiving
school-based and community mental health services to address student needs
resulting from exposure to violence.
(3) Annual increase in the school engagement (as defined in the Notice Inviting
Applications) of students served by the grant.
(4) Annual increase in the quality of family engagement with community-based
organization(s), as defined and measured by the grantee.

Baseline Data – Applicants must provide baseline data (as defined in the Notice Inviting
Applications) for each of the project performance measures listed above and explain why each
proposed baseline is valid; or, if the applicant has determined that there are no established
baseline data for a particular performance measure, an explanation of why there is no established
baseline and of how and when, during the project period, the applicant would establish a valid
baseline for the performance measure.

Performance Measure Targets – The applicant must also propose annual targets for the
measures listed on pages 61-64 of this application. Applications must provide the following
information as directed under 34 CFR 75.110(b) and (c):

(1) Why each proposed performance target is ambitious (as defined in the Notice Inviting
Application) yet achievable compared to the baseline for the performance measure.

(2) The data collection and reporting methods the applicant would use and why those
methods are likely to yield reliable, valid, and meaningful performance data; and (b) the
applicant’s capacity to collect and report reliable, valid, and meaningful performance
data, as evidenced by high-quality data collection, analysis, and reporting in other
projects or research.

Note: If the applicant does not have experience with collection and reporting of
performance data through other projects or research, the applicant should provide other
evidence of capacity to successfully carry out data collection and reporting for its proposed
project.

Reviewers of each application will score related selection criteria on the basis of how well an
applicant has considered these project performance measures, the requirements for baseline data,
and performance targets in conceptualizing the approach and evaluation of the project.

Please use the most recent data available and indicate the year in which the data was collected.
Below is a sample table for each project performance measure. Applicants are encouraged to use
the tables and methodology below to provide the required baseline data for school year 2013-
2019.

Performance Measure 1: Annual decrease in violent, aggressive, and disruptive behavior

in schools served by the grant.

63
 Schools Number of students to be served by Number of incidents for
participating in the grant associated behavior
the grant (Baseline) (Baseline)
(2018-2019) (2018-2024)

XYZ Elementary 475 221

ABC Elementary 350 45

JKL Elementary 535 163

TOTAL 1,360 429

NOTE: The behavior reported must include incidents that involved referrals for disciplinary
reasons in which a student was referred to school personnel (including, but not limited to, the
principal, the vice principal, school security, or school-based mental health professionals) for
violations of the LEA’s discipline code, and any provisions related to violent, aggressive, and
disruptive behavior.

Performance Measure 2: Annual increase in the number of students in schools served by

the grant receiving school-based and community mental health services to address student
needs resulting from exposure to violence.

Schools Number of students to be served by Number of students

participating in the grant receiving services
the grant (Baseline) (Baseline)
(2018-2019) (2018-2024)

XYZ Elementary 475 85

ABC Elementary 350 58

JKL Elementary 535 79

TOTAL 1,360 222

NOTE: Students counted as receiving services should be those proposed to be served by the
grant and currently receiving school-based mental health services, or those provided by a
community mental health service provider as a result of a referral from the school or LEA – in
both cases to address student needs resulting from exposure to violence.

64
Performance Measure 3: Annual increase in the school engagement (as defined in the
Notice Inviting Applications) of students served by the grant.

Schools Number of students to be served by Number of students

participating in the grant engaged in school
the grant (Baseline) (Baseline)
(2018-2019) (2018-2024)

XYZ Elementary 475 201

ABC Elementary 350 166

JKL Elementary 535 284

TOTAL 1,360 651

NOTE: There are multiple instruments schools and LEAs may use to measure student
engagement. A 2011 report funded by the U.S. Department of Education reviewed the
characteristics of 21 instruments that measure student engagement in upper elementary through
high school. It summarizes what each instrument measures, describes its purposes and uses, and
provides technical information on its psychometric properties. The report is available online at:
http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/projects/project.asp?ProjectID=268

Performance Measure: Annual increase in the quality of family engagement with

community-based organization(s), as defined and measured by the grantee.

Schools Number of students to be served by Number of families

participating in the grant engaged in community-
the grant (Baseline) based organization(s)
(2018-2019) (Baseline)
(2018-2024)

XYZ Elementary 475 201

ABC Elementary 350 166

JKL Elementary 535 284

TOTAL 1,360 651

NOTE: There are multiple instruments schools and LEAs may use to measure student
engagement. A 2011 report funded by the U.S. Department of Education reviewed the
characteristics of 21 instruments that measure student engagement in upper elementary through

65
high school. It summarizes what each instrument measures, describes its purposes and uses, and
provides technical information on its psychometric properties. The report is available online at:
http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/projects/project.asp?ProjectID=268

For specific requirements on grantee reporting, please go to the ED Performance Report Form
524B at http://www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.

66
Legal and Regulatory Information
Notice Inviting Applications
4000-01-U

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Applications for New Awards; Project Prevent Grant Program

AGENCY: Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, Department of Education.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Department of Education (Department) is issuing a notice inviting

applications for fiscal year (FY) 2019 for the Project Prevent grant program, Catalog of Federal

Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number 84.184M. This notice relates to the approved information

collection under OMB control number 1894-0006.

DATES:

Applications Available: [INSERT DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL

REGISTER].

Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: [INSERT DATE 40 DAYS AFTER DATE OF

PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER].

Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: [INSERT DATE 100 DAYS AFTER DATE OF

PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER].

ADDRESSES: For the addresses for obtaining and submitting an application, please refer to our

Common Instructions for Applicants to Department of Education Discretionary Grant Programs,

published in the Federal Register on February 13, 2019 (84 FR 3768), and available at

www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-02-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf.

67
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicole A. White, U.S. Department of

Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW, room 3E326, Washington, DC 20202-6450. Telephone:

(202) 453-6729. Email: Project.Prevent@ed.gov.

If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text telephone (TTY), call the

Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-800-877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description

Purpose of Program: The Project Prevent grant program provides grants to local educational

agencies (LEAs) to increase their capacity to help schools in communities with pervasive

violence to better address the needs of affected students and to break the cycle of violence in

those communities.

Background:

Children’s exposure to violence, whether as victims or witnesses, is often associated with

long-term physical, psychological, and emotional harms. These harms include, among others,

depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic disorders; failing or having difficulty in school; and

delinquency or criminal behavior, including violent acts.4

In December 2018, the Federal Commission on School Safety (FCSS) released its final report.5

The report offers several recommendations for States, local communities, and the Federal

government to improve school safety. The Project Prevent grant program supports activities

directly linked with recommendations identified in the FCSS. Under this program, grantees may

4 https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/227744.pdf.
5 https://www2.ed.gov/documents/school-safety/school-safety-report.pdf.

68
use funds to address some of those FCSS recommendations in their local districts as they

develop approaches to improving school engagement, school safety, and the school environment

for all students.

Project Prevent grants will enable LEAs to increase their capacity to identify, assess, and

serve students exposed to pervasive violence, helping LEAS to offer affected students mental

health services for trauma or anxiety; support conflict resolution programs; and implement other

school–based violence prevention strategies in order to reduce the likelihood that these students

will later commit violent acts.

Priorities: This competition includes one absolute priority and two competitive preference

priorities. We are establishing the absolute priority and Competitive Preference Priority 1 for the

FY 2019 grant competition and any subsequent year in which we make awards from the list of

unfunded applications from this competition, in accordance with section 437(d)(1) of the General

Education Provisions Act (GEPA), 20 U.S.C. 1232(d)(1). In accordance with 34 CFR

75.105(b)(2)(ii), Competitive Preference Priority 2 is from the Department’s Notice of Final

Supplemental Priorities and Definitions for Discretionary Grant Programs (Supplemental

Priorities), published in the Federal Register on March 2, 2018 (83 FR 9096).

Absolute Priority: This priority is an absolute priority. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3) we consider

only applications that meet this priority.

This priority is:

Expanding the Capacity of LEAs to Assist Schools in Communities with Pervasive

Violence to Break the Cycle of Violence by Better Meeting the Needs of Affected Students.

69
 Under this priority, we provide funding for projects to expand the capacity of LEAs to more

effectively assist impacted schools in communities with pervasive violence to better meet the

needs of students directly or indirectly exposed to pervasive violence.

Applicants must address each of the following four subparts of this absolute priority.

Projects must offer students: (1) access to school-based counseling services, or referrals to

community-based counseling services, for assistance in coping with trauma or anxiety; (2)

school-based social emotional and behavioral supports for students to help address the effects of

violence; (3) conflict resolution and other school-based strategies to prevent future violence; and

(4) activities designed to promote a safer and improved school environment, which may include

activities designed to decrease the incidence of harassment, bullying, fighting, gang

participation, sexual assault, and substance abuse.

Projects funded under this priority may use up to 12 months during the first year of the project

period for program planning. Applicants that propose to use this option must provide sufficient

justification for why this program planning time is necessary, provide the intended outcomes of

program planning in Year 1, and include a description of the proposed strategies and activities to

be supported, such as developing baseline Government Performance and Results Act of 1993

data as described in the Performance Measures section of this notice.

Competitive Preference Priorities: These priorities are competitive preference priorities. Under

34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(1), we award an additional eight points to an application that meets

Competitive Preference Priority 1, and we award up to an additional two points to an application,

depending on how well the application meets Competitive Preference Priority 2, for a maximum

of ten possible additional points under the competitive preference priorities. An applicant must

70
clearly indicate in the abstract section of its application that it is addressing a competitive

preference priority or priorities, including which of the priorities its application addresses.

These priorities are:

Competitive Preference Priority 1--Collaboration with a Local Mental Health Agency (up to 8

points).

An application that includes a memorandum of agreement (MOA) or memorandum of

understanding (MOU) signed by the authorized representative of a local mental health agency

that agrees to collaborate with the applicant on the proposed project and provide resources and/or

administer services that are likely to substantially contribute to positive outcomes for the

proposed project.

Competitive Preference Priority 2--Fostering Knowledge and Promoting the Development of

Skills that Prepare Students to be Informed, Thoughtful, and Productive Individuals and Citizens

(up to 2 points).

Supporting projects likely to improve student academic performance and better prepare

students for employment, responsible citizenship, and fulfilling lives, including by preparing

children or students to do one or more of the following:

(i) Develop positive personal relationships with others.

(ii) Develop determination, perseverance, and the ability to overcome obstacles.

(iii) Develop self-esteem through perseverance and earned success.

(iv) Develop problem-solving skills.

(v) Develop self-regulation in order to work toward long-term goals.

71
Requirements: We are establishing these application requirements for the FY 2019 grant

competition and any subsequent year in which we make awards from the list of unfunded

applications from this competition, in accordance with section 437(d)(1) of GEPA, 20 U.S.C.

1232(d)(1).

Application Requirements: Applicants must describe the following in their applications:

(a) The severity and magnitude of the problem and identification of schools to be served by

the proposed project.

Applicants must identify the schools to be served by project activities and describe how

pervasive violence in the community is specifically affecting students in those schools.

Applicants must describe the nature of the problem for the LEA, based on information such as,

but not limited to, incidents of community domestic violence or violent crime; rates of child

abuse and neglect; school crime and safety data; student mental health screenings or

assessments; surveys of school climate; surveys of student engagement; or other relevant data

and information. The description may also include demographic data provided by U.S. Census

surveys. In order to assess the magnitude of the problem and ensure the schools selected have

the greatest need, school data cited must be compared to similar data at the State or local level,

and on a per capita basis (such as homicides per 100,000 persons) when available.

(b) Collaboration and coordination with related Federal, State, and local initiatives.

Applicants must describe how they intend to work collaboratively with Federal, State,

and local juvenile justice, mental health, public health, child welfare, or other community

agencies to achieve project goals and objectives. Applicants must also describe proposed

coordination with existing federally funded efforts related to youth violence prevention and

mental health promotion (such as other violence prevention-related grants administered by the

72
U.S. Department of Justice, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration,

and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention6), if applicable. Evidence of collaboration

and coordination must be provided through letters of support or MOAs/MOUs from local or

State agencies and other federally funded projects, if applicable. Finally, applicants must

describe how they will use Project Prevent grant program funds to supplement, rather than

supplant, existing, ongoing, or new efforts to reduce youth violence and mitigate the effects of

pervasive violence on students.

(c) Building greater and more effective family engagement in the education of their

children or students.

Applicants must describe how the proposed project will encourage or improve family

engagement.

(d) Creating or expanding partnerships with community-based organizations to provide

supports and services to students and families.

Applicants must describe how they will partner with community-based organizations

(e.g., local civic or community service organizations, local faith-based organizations, or local

foundations or non-profit organizations) to provide support to students and families.

(e) Activities that will expand and improve LEA capacity to serve students exposed to

pervasive violence and ensure affected students receive mental health services.

Applicants must describe the specific activities they will conduct to expand and improve

LEA capacity to serve students exposed to pervasive violence and to ensure that affected

6 See, for example, https://www.justice.gov/ovw,

https://www.justice.gov/ovw/domestic-violence, https://www.ovc.gov/,
https://www.samhsa.gov/grants, and https://www.cdc.gov/grants/index.html.

73
students receive appropriate mental health services. To meet this requirement, the applicant

must propose to conduct three or more of the following:

(1) Professional development opportunities for LEA and school mental health staff (e.g.,

counselors, psychologists, and social workers) on how to screen for and respond to violence-

related trauma and implement appropriate school-based mitigation strategies or trauma-informed

care.

(2) Activities designed to improve the range, availability, and quality of school-based

mental health services by hiring school and clinical psychologists, school counselors, or school

social workers with expertise or training in violence prevention and trauma-informed care and

qualified to respond to the mental health needs of students who have experienced trauma as a

result of exposure to violence.

(3) Training for school staff (e.g., teachers, administrators, and support staff),

community partners, youth, and parents on the problem of student exposure to pervasive

violence, as well as the importance of screening students and providing interventions to help

students cope with traumatic events.

(4) Activities that address the needs of students in affected schools by developing or

improving processes to better target services to these students and developing or improving

processes to assess students who are exposed to pervasive violence and who may be

experiencing resulting mental, emotional, or behavioral disorders.

(5) Activities designed to enhance linkages between LEA mental health services and

community mental health systems to ensure affected students receive referrals to treatment as

appropriate.

74
 (f) The delivery of a tiered continuum of evidence-based programs and practices in

selected schools to promote conflict resolution, improve school climate and safety, and

implement other school-based strategies to break the cycle of violence.

Applicants must describe the continuum of evidence-based programs and practices that

will be implemented at the school level and how these programs and practices will be organized

to provide differentiated support based on student need and to break the cycle of violence. These

programs and practices must include all of the following:

(1) Interventions and activities that are available to all students in a school, regardless of

risk level, with the goal of preventing negative or violent behavior (such as harassment, bullying,

fighting, gang participation, sexual assault, and substance abuse) and enhancing student

knowledge and skills regarding positive behavior (such as expected school behavior and conflict

resolution).

(2) Interventions and activities (such as those related to anger management, conflict

resolution, promotion of positive behavior, and development of protective factors) that target

individual students or a sub-group of students whose risk of developing mental or behavioral

disorders is significantly higher than average.

(3) Interventions and services that target individual students who are at risk for, and have

shown signs of, mental, emotional, or behavioral disorders; exhibit aggressive, violent, or

disruptive behavior; or participate in gangs.

To meet this requirement, applicants must discuss the research and evidence supporting

the proposed programs and practices and the expected effects on the target population.

Applicants may use the Federal registries listed in the application package for identifying such

programs and practices.

75
 (g) The framework for planning, implementation, and sustainability.

Applicants must describe how the proposed project is integrated and aligned with the

mission and vision of the LEA, including a description of the relationship of the project to the

LEA’s existing school safety or related plan. Applicants must include a description of

anticipated challenges to success of the project and how they will be addressed, such as

mitigating turnover at the LEA leadership, school leadership, and staff levels. Applicants must

also include a timeline of activities for--

(1) Planning, which includes: conducting a needs assessment that is comprehensive and

examines areas for improvement related to learning conditions that create a safe and healthy

environment for students, creating a logic model, completing resource mapping, selecting

evidence-based programs, developing evaluation plans, and engaging partners and stakeholders;

(2) Implementation, which includes: training on evidence-based programs, executing

evidence-based programs, continuing engagement with stakeholders, communicating and

collaborating strategically with community partners, and evaluating program implementation;

and

(3) Sustainability, which includes: further developing and expanding on the project’s

successes beyond the end of the grant, at the school and community levels, in alignment with

other related efforts.

Definitions: We are establishing the definition of “school engagement” in this notice for the FY

2019 grant competition and any subsequent year in which we make awards from the list of

unfunded applications from this competition, in accordance with section 437(d)(1) of GEPA, 20

U.S.C. 1232(d)(1). The definition of “local educational agency” is from 20 U.S.C. 7801(30).

76
The definitions of “ambitious,” “baseline,” “evidence-based,” “experimental study,” “logic

model,” “project component,” “promising evidence,” “quasi-experimental design study,”

“relevant outcome,” and “What Works Clearinghouse Handbook” are from 34 CFR 77.1.

These definitions are:

Ambitious means promoting continued, meaningful improvement for program participants or

for other individuals or entities affected by the grant, or representing a significant advancement

in the field of education research, practices, or methodologies. When used to describe a

performance target, whether a performance target is ambitious depends upon the context of the

relevant performance measure and the baseline for that measure.

Baseline means the starting point from which performance is measured and targets are set.

Evidence-based means the proposed project component is supported by promising evidence.

Experimental study means a study that is designed to compare outcomes between two groups

of individuals (such as students) that are otherwise equivalent except for their assignment to

either a treatment group receiving a project component or a control group that does not.

Randomized controlled trials, regression discontinuity design studies, and single-case design

studies are the specific types of experimental studies that, depending on their design and

implementation (e.g., sample attrition in randomized controlled trials and regression

discontinuity design studies), can meet What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) standards without

reservations as described in the WWC Handbook:

(a) A randomized controlled trial employs random assignment of, for example, students,

teachers, classrooms, or schools to receive the project component being evaluated (the treatment

group) or not to receive the project component (the control group).

77
 (b) A regression discontinuity design study assigns the project component being evaluated

using a measured variable (e.g., assigning students reading below a cutoff score to tutoring or

developmental education classes) and controls for that variable in the analysis of outcomes.

(c) A single-case design study uses observations of a single case (e.g., a student eligible for a

behavioral intervention) over time in the absence and presence of a controlled treatment

manipulation to determine whether the outcome is systematically related to the treatment.

Local educational agency (LEA) means:

(a) A public board of education or other public authority legally constituted within a State for

either administrative control or direction of, or to perform a service function for, public

elementary schools or secondary schools in a city, county, township, school district, or other

political subdivision of a State, or of or for a combination of school districts or counties that is

recognized in a State as an administrative agency for its public elementary schools or secondary

schools.

(b) The term includes any other public institution or agency having administrative control

and direction of a public elementary school or secondary school.

(c) The term includes an elementary school or secondary school funded by the Bureau of

Indian Education but only to the extent that including the school makes the school eligible for

programs for which specific eligibility is not provided to the school in another provision of law

and the school does not have a student population that is smaller than the student population of

the local educational agency receiving assistance under the ESEA with the smallest student

population, except that the school shall not be subject to the jurisdiction of any State educational

agency other than the Bureau of Indian Education.

78
 (d) The term includes educational service agencies and consortia of those agencies.

(e) The term includes the State educational agency in a State in which the State educational

agency is the sole educational agency for all public schools.

Logic model (also referred to as a theory of action) means a framework that identifies key

project components of the proposed project (i.e., the active “ingredients” that are hypothesized to

be critical to achieving the relevant outcomes) and describes the theoretical and operational

relationships among the key project components and relevant outcomes.

Project component means an activity, strategy, intervention, process, product, practice, or

policy included in a project. Evidence may pertain to an individual project component or to a

combination of project components (e.g., training teachers on instructional practices for English

learners and follow-on coaching for these teachers).

Promising evidence means that there is evidence of the effectiveness of a key project

component in improving a relevant outcome, based on a relevant finding from one of the

following:

(a) A practice guide prepared by WWC reporting a “strong evidence base” or “moderate

evidence base” for the corresponding practice guide recommendation;

(b) An intervention report prepared by the WWC reporting a “positive effect” or “potentially

positive effect” on a relevant outcome with no reporting of a “negative effect” or “potentially

negative effect” on a relevant outcome; or

(c) A single study assessed by the Department, as appropriate, that—

(1) Is an experimental study, a quasi-experimental design study, or a well-designed and well-

implemented correlational study with statistical controls for selection bias (e.g., a study using

79
regression methods to account for differences between a treatment group and a comparison

group); and

(2) Includes at least one statistically significant and positive (i.e., favorable) effect on a

relevant outcome.

Quasi-experimental design study means a study using a design that attempts to approximate

an experimental study by identifying a comparison group that is similar to the treatment group in

important respects. This type of study, depending on design and implementation (e.g.,

establishment of baseline equivalence of the groups being compared), can meet WWC standards

with reservations, but cannot meet WWC standards without reservations, as described in the

WWC Handbook.

Relevant outcome means the student outcome(s) or other outcome(s) the key project

component is designed to improve, consistent with the specific goals of the program.

School engagement means participation in school-related activities, and the quality of school

relationships, which may include relationships between and among administrators, teachers,

parents, and students.

What Works Clearinghouse Handbook (WWC Handbook) means the standards and

procedures set forth in the WWC Procedures and Standards Handbook, Version 3.0 or Version

2.1 (incorporated by reference, see 34 CFR 77.2). Study findings eligible for review under

WWC standards can meet WWC standards without reservations, meet WWC standards with

reservations, or not meet WWC standards. WWC practice guides and intervention reports

include findings from systematic reviews of evidence as described in the Handbook

documentation.

80
Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking: Under the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553), the

Department generally offers interested parties the opportunity to comment on proposed priorities,

definitions, and requirements. Section 437(d)(1) of GEPA, however, allows the Secretary to

exempt from rulemaking requirements regulations governing the first grant competition under a

new or substantially revised program authority. This is the first grant competition for this

program under section 4631(a)(1)(B) of the ESEA (20 U.S.C. 7281) and therefore qualifies for

this exemption. In order to ensure timely grant awards, the Secretary has decided to forgo public

comment on the priorities, definitions, and requirements under section 437(d)(1) of GEPA.

These priorities, definitions, and requirements will apply to the FY 2019 grant competition and

any subsequent year in which we make awards from the list of unfunded applications from this

competition.

Program Authority: Section 4631(a)(1)(B) of the ESEA (20 U.S.C. 7281).

Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General Administrative Regulations in

34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84, 97, 98, and 99. (b) The Office of Management and Budget

Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) in 2

CFR part 180, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR part 3485. (c)

The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal

Awards in 2 CFR part 200, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR

part 3474. (d) The Supplemental Priorities.

II. Award Information

Type of Award: Discretionary grants.

Estimated Available Funds: $10,000,000.

81
 Contingent upon the availability of funds and the quality of applications, we may make

additional awards in FY 2020 and subsequent years from the list of unfunded applications from

the competition announced in this notice.

Estimated Range of Awards: $250,000 to $1,000,000.

Estimated Average Size of Awards: $500,000.

Estimated Number of Awards: 20.

Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this notice.

Project Period: Up to 60 months.

III. Eligibility Information

1. Eligible Applicants: LEAs, including charter schools that are considered LEAs under

State law.

2. Cost Sharing or Matching: This program does not require cost sharing or matching.

3. Subgrantees: A grantee under this competition may not award subgrants to entities to

directly carry out project activities described in its application.

4. Limitation on Awards: The Department will award only one grant per LEA.

IV. Application and Submission Information

1. Application Submission Instructions: Applicants are required to follow the Common

Instructions for Applicants to Department of Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published

in the Federal Register on February 13, 2019 (84 FR 3768), and available at

www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-02-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf, which contain requirements

and information on how to submit an application.

82
 2. Intergovernmental Review: This program is subject to Executive Order 12372 and the

regulations in 34 CFR part 79.

3. Funding Restrictions: We reference regulations outlining funding restrictions in the

Applicable Regulations section of this notice.

V. Application Review Information

1. Selection Criteria: The selection criteria for this program are from 34 CFR 75.210. The

maximum score for all selection criteria is 100 points. The points or weights assigned to each

criterion are indicated in parentheses. Non-Federal peer reviewers will evaluate and score each

application program narrative against the following selection criteria:

(a) Need for project (15 points).

(1) The Secretary considers the need for the project.

(2) In determining the need for the project, the Secretary considers the following factors:

(i) The magnitude of the need for the services to be provided or the activities to be carried out

by the proposed project. (10 points)

(ii) The extent to which specific gaps or weaknesses in services, infrastructure, or

opportunities have been identified and will be addressed by the proposed project, including the

nature and magnitude of those gaps or weaknesses. (5 points)

(b) Significance (15 points).

(1) The Secretary considers the significance of the proposed project.

(2) In determining the significance of the proposed project, the Secretary considers the

extent to which the proposed project is likely to build local capacity to provide, improve, or

expand services that address the needs of the target population.

83
 (c) Quality of the project design (15 points).

(1) The Secretary considers the quality of the design of the proposed project.

(2) In determining the quality of the design of the proposed project, the Secretary

considers the following factors:

(i) The extent to which the design of the proposed project is appropriate to, and will

successfully address, the needs of the target population or other identified needs. (5 points)

(ii) The extent to which the proposed project will integrate with or build on similar or related

efforts to improve relevant outcomes (as defined in this notice), using existing funding streams

from other programs or policies supported by community, State, and Federal resources. (5

points)

(iii) The extent to which the proposed project is supported by promising evidence (as defined

in this notice). (5 points)

(d) Quality of the project services (25 points).

(1) The Secretary considers the quality of the services to be provided by the proposed

project.

(2) In determining the quality of the services to be provided by the proposed project, the

Secretary considers the quality and sufficiency of strategies for ensuring equal access and

treatment for eligible project participants who are members of groups that have traditionally been

underrepresented based on race, color, national origin, gender, age, or disability.

(3) In addition, the Secretary considers the extent to which the training or professional

development services to be provided by the proposed project are of sufficient quality, intensity,

and duration to lead to improvements in practice among the recipients of those services.

(e) Quality of the management plan (15 points).

84
 (1) The Secretary considers the quality of the management plan for the proposed project.

(2) In determining the quality of the management plan for the proposed project, the

Secretary considers the adequacy of the management plan to achieve the objectives of the

proposed project on time and within budget, including clearly defined responsibilities, timelines,

and milestones for accomplishing project tasks.

(f) Quality of the project evaluation (15 points).

(1) The Secretary considers the quality of the evaluation to be conducted of the proposed

project.

(2) In determining the quality of the evaluation, the Secretary considers the extent to

which the methods of evaluation are thorough, feasible, and appropriate to the goals, objectives,

and outcomes of the proposed project.

2. Review and Selection Process: We remind potential applicants that in reviewing

applications in any discretionary grant competition, the Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR

75.217(d)(3), the past performance of the applicant in carrying out a previous award, such as the

applicant’s use of funds, achievement of project objectives, and compliance with grant

conditions. The Secretary may also consider whether the applicant failed to submit a timely

performance report or submitted a report of unacceptable quality.

In addition, in making a competitive grant award, the Secretary also requires various

assurances including those applicable to Federal civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in

programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department (34 CFR

100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).

85
 3. Risk Assessment and Specific Conditions: Consistent with 2 CFR 200.205, before

awarding grants under this program the Department conducts a review of the risks posed by

applicants. Under 2 CFR 3474.10, the Secretary may impose specific conditions and, in

appropriate circumstances, high-risk conditions on a grant if the applicant or grantee is not

financially stable; has a history of unsatisfactory performance; has a financial or other

management system that does not meet the standards in 2 CFR part 200 subpart D; has not

fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant; or is otherwise not responsible.

4. Integrity and Performance System: If you are selected under this competition to receive an

award that over the course of the project period may exceed the simplified acquisition threshold

(currently $250,000), under 2 CFR 200.205(a)(2) we must make a judgment about your integrity,

business ethics, and record of performance under Federal awards--that is, the risk posed by you

as an applicant--before we make an award. In doing so, we must consider any information about

you that is in the integrity and performance system (currently referred to as the Federal Awardee

Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS)), accessible through the System for

Award Management. You may review and comment on any information about yourself that a

Federal agency previously entered and that is currently in FAPIIS.

Please note that, if the total value of your currently active grants, cooperative agreements, and

procurement contracts from the Federal Government exceeds $10,000,000, the reporting

requirements in 2 CFR part 200, Appendix XII, require you to report certain integrity

information to FAPIIS semiannually. Please review the requirements in 2 CFR part 200,

Appendix XII, if this grant plus all the other Federal funds you receive exceed $10,000,000.

VI. Award Administration Information

86
 1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your U.S. Representative and

U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award Notification (GAN); or we may send you an email

containing a link to access an electronic version of your GAN. We may notify you informally,

also.

If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding, we notify you.

2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify administrative and

national policy requirements in the application package and reference these and other

requirements in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice.

We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of an award in the

Applicable Regulations section of this notice and include these and other specific conditions in

the GAN. The GAN also incorporates your approved application as part of your binding

commitments under the grant.

3. Open Licensing Requirements: Unless an exception applies, if you are awarded a

grant under this competition, you will be required to openly license to the public grant

deliverables created in whole, or in part, with Department grant funds. When the deliverable

consists of modifications to pre-existing works, the license extends only to those modifications

that can be separately identified and only to the extent that open licensing is permitted under the

terms of any licenses or other legal restrictions on the use of pre-existing works. Additionally, a

grantee or subgrantee that is awarded competitive grant funds must have a plan to disseminate

these public grant deliverables. This dissemination plan can be developed and submitted after

your application has been reviewed and selected for funding. For additional information on the

open licensing requirements please refer to 2 CFR 3474.20.

87
 4. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a grant under this competition, you must ensure that

you have in place the necessary processes and systems to comply with the reporting requirements

in 2 CFR part 170 should you receive funding under the competition. This does not apply if you

have an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b).

(b) At the end of your project period, you must submit a final performance report, including

financial information, as directed by the Secretary. If you receive a multiyear award, you must

submit an annual performance report that provides the most current performance and financial

expenditure information as directed by the Secretary under 34 CFR 75.118. The Secretary may

also require more frequent performance reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific

requirements on reporting, please go to www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.

5. Performance Measures: The Department has established the following Government

Performance and Results Act of 1993 performance measures for the Project Prevent grant

program:

(a) Annual decrease in violent, aggressive, and disruptive behavior in schools served by

the grant.

(b) Annual increase in the number of students in schools served by the grant receiving

school-based and community-based mental health services to address student needs resulting

from exposure to violence.

(c) Annual increase in the school engagement (as defined in this notice) of students served

by the grant.

(d) Quality of family engagement and grantee engagement with community-based

organization(s), as defined and measured by the grantee.

88
 These measures constitute the Department’s indicators of success for this program.

Consequently, we advise an applicant for a grant under this program to give careful

consideration to these measures in conceptualizing the approach and evaluation for its proposed

project. Each grantee will be required to provide, in its annual performance and final reports,

data about its progress in meeting these measures. This data will be considered by the

Department in making continuation awards.

Consistent with 34 CFR 75.591, grantees funded under this program must comply with the

requirements of any evaluation of the program conducted by the Department or an evaluator

selected by the Department.

Baseline data: Applicants must provide baseline data (as defined in this notice) for each of

the performance measures listed above and explain why each baseline is valid; or, if the

applicant has determined that there are no established baseline data for a particular performance

measure, explain why there is no established baseline and explain how and when, during the

project period, the applicant will establish a valid baseline for the performance measure.

Performance measure targets: In addition, applicants must propose annual targets for the

measures listed above in their application. Applicants must also provide the following

information as directed under 34 CFR 75.110(b) and (c):

(1) Why each proposed performance target is ambitious (as defined in this notice) yet

achievable compared to the baseline for the performance measure.

(2) (a) The data collection and reporting methods the applicant would use and why those

methods are likely to yield reliable, valid, and meaningful performance data; and (b) the

applicant’s capacity to collect and report reliable, valid, and meaningful performance data, as

evidenced by high-quality data collection, analysis, and reporting in other projects or research.

89
Note: If the applicant does not have experience with collection and reporting of performance

data through other projects or research, the applicant should provide other evidence of capacity

to successfully carry out data collection and reporting for its proposed project, which may

include contracting with providers who have relevant expertise.

The reviewers of each application will score related selection criteria on the basis of how well

an applicant has considered these measures in conceptualizing the approach and evaluation of the

project.

All grantees must submit an annual performance report and final performance report with

information that is responsive to these performance measures.

6. Continuation Awards: In making a continuation award under 34 CFR 75.253, the

Secretary considers, among other things: whether a grantee has made substantial progress in

achieving the goals and objectives of the project; whether the grantee has expended funds in a

manner that is consistent with its approved application and budget; and, if the Secretary has

established performance measurement requirements, the performance targets in the grantee’s

approved application.

In making a continuation award, the Secretary also considers whether the grantee is operating

in compliance with the assurances in its approved application, including those applicable to

Federal civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities receiving Federal

financial assistance from the Department (34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).

VII. Other Information

Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this document and a copy of the

application package in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc)

90
on request to the program contact person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT.

Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this document is the document

published in the Federal Register. You may access the official edition of the Federal Register

and the Code of Federal Regulations at: www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can view this

document, as well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal Register,

in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF). To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat

Reader, which is available free at the site.

You may also access documents of the Department published in the Federal Register by

using the article search feature at: www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced

search feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published by the Department.

Dated:

________________________________
Frank T. Brogan,
Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary
Education.

91
Authorizing Legislation
Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended

Title IV, Part A, Subpart 2, Section 4121 – Federal Activities

(a) Program Authorized—From funds made available to carry out this subpart under section
4003(2), the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the
Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, and the Attorney General, shall carry out
programs to prevent the illegal use of drugs and violence among, and promote safety and
discipline for, students. The Secretary shall carry out such programs directly, or through grants,
contracts, or cooperative agreements with public and private entities and individuals, or through
agreements with other federal agencies, and shall coordinate such programs with other
appropriate federal activities. Such programs may include:
1) the development and demonstration of innovative strategies for the training of school
personnel, parents, and members of the community for drug and violence prevention
activities based on State and local needs;
2) the development, demonstration, scientifically based evaluation, and dissemination of
innovative and high quality drug and violence prevention programs and activities, based
on State and local needs, which may include-
a) alternative education models, either established within a school or separate and
apart from an existing school, that are designed to promote drug and violence
prevention, reduce disruptive behavior, reduce the need for repeat suspensions
and expulsions, enable students to meet challenging State academic standards, and
enable students to return to the regular classroom as soon as possible;
b) community service and service-learning projects, designed to rebuild safe and
health neighborhoods and increase students’ sense of individual responsibility
c) video-based projects developed by noncommercial telecommunications entities
that provide young people with models for conflict resolution and responsible
decision-making; and
d) child abuse education and prevention programs for elementary and secondary
students;
3) the provision of information on drug abuse education and prevention to the Secretary of
Health and Human Services for dissemination;
4) the provision of information on violence prevention and education and school safety to
the Department of Justice for dissemination;
5) technical assistance to chief executive officers, State agencies, local educational agencies,
and other recipients of funding under this part to build capacity to develop and implement
high-quality, effective drug and violence prevention programs consistent with the
principles of effectiveness in section 4115(a);
6) assistance to school systems that have particularly severe drug and violence problems,
including hiring drug prevention and school safety coordinators, or assistance to support
appropriate response efforts to crisis situations;
7) the development of education and training programs, curricula, instructional materials,
and professional training and development for preventing and reducing the incidence of
crimes and conflicts motivated by hate in localities most directly affected by hate crimes;

92
 8) activities in communities designated as empowerment zones or enterprise communities
that will connect schools to community-wide efforts to reduce drug and violence
problems; and
9) other activities in accordance with the purpose of this part, based on State and local
needs.

(b) Peer Review—The Secretary shall use a peer review process in reviewing applications for
funds under this section.

93