Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Banco Filipino V NLRC Case Digest

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Banco Filipino v NLRC

Facts:

BANCO FILIPINO SAVINGS AND MORTGAGE BANK was placed under receivership
and was later ordered to be liquidated by the Monetary Board of the Central Bank.

FORTUNATO M. DIZON. Jr., who was then the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating
Officer of the bank received a letter from the Central Bank that all management authority in the
bank had been assumed by the Central Bank appointed liquidators and that his employment is
being terminated.

Mr. Dizon filed with the liquidator a request for the payment to him of the cash equivalent of his
vacation and sick leave credits and unused reimbursable allowance.

He was not paid by the liquidator because Dizon's claim should be treated as a claim of a
creditor and therefore be processed pursuant to the liquidation plan as approved by the
Monetary Board.

So, Dizon filed a complaint with the labor arbiter against the bank for recovery of unpaid salary,
the cash equivalent of his accumulated vacation and sick leaves, termination pay under Article
283 of the Labor Code and moral damages and attorney's fees.

Issue:
Whether unpaid wages of employees are preferred credits

Ruling:

In Republic v. Peralta the SC pointed out that the Article 110 of the Labor Code did not
upgrade the worker's claim as absolutely preferred credit.

The provision did not alter Articles 2241 and 2242 of the Civil Code that creditors with
liens over a certain property are still given special preference over the proceeds of that property.

And it is only after these specially preferred credits are satisfied may the ordinary
preferred credits under Article 2244 of the Civil Code be paid according to their order of priority.

Therefore not being an absolutely preferred credit, as taxes are under Articles 2241 (1)
and 2242 (1), Dizon's claims cannot be paid ahead of other credits and outside of the liquidation
proceeding because the "free property" or the property left after the creditors mentioned in
Articles 2241 and 2242 are paid has not yet been determined

Thus, Dizon's adjudicated claims should be submitted to the liquidators for processing. If
it is later determined that Banco Filipino's liquidation is improper then the NLRC'S decision may
be executed under normal procedure. If the contrary is proven, however, and the bank's
liquidation should proceed, Dizon's established claims should be treated as an ordinary
preferred credit enjoying first preference under Art. 2244 of the Civil Code.

You might also like