Chemical Equilibrium

A Study of Chemical Equilibrium
(By Shweta)
Mphil/4148/CHE/2008J
A STUDY OF CHEMICAL
EQUILIBRIUM
Devoted to the Global Open University, Nagaland
to award degree of
Master of Philosophy (M. Phil) in Chemistry
Academic Year – 2008-2009
Submitted by : Shweta
Enrollment No. : M.phil / 4148 / CHE / 2008J
Under the Guidance of : Dr. Ashok Kumar Yadav

(Ph.D. in Chemistry)
Lecturer, Department of Chemistry, B.N. Mandal
University, Lalu Nagar, Madhepura, Bihar.
(By Shweta)
Contents
Part A
1. Devotion
2. Declaration
3. Certification
4. Acknowledgment
5. About the Thesis
Part B
6. Chemical Changes: How Far, How Fast?
7. What is Equilibrium?
8. What is Chemical Equilibrium?
9. What is a reversible reaction?
10. What is the Law of Mass Action?
11. How do we know when a reaction is at equilibrium?
12. What is the le Châtelier Principle and why is it important?
13. How do changes in temperature affect equilibria?
14. How do changes in pressure affect equilibria?

(By Shweta)
15. What is the Haber process and why is it important?
16. What is the equilibrium quotient?
17. Does everything stop when equilibrium is reached?
18. Using concentration and pressure terms in equilibrium
expressions
19. Do equilibrium constants have units?
20. Heterogeneous reactions: the vapor pressure of solid
hydrates
21. How can we find the equilibrium constant for a series of
reactions?
22. Measuring and calculating equilibrium constants
23. How can we predict equilibrium compositions?

(By Shweta)
DEVOTION
The Thesis “A Study of Chemical Equilibrium” is devoted to the Global Open
University, Nagaland to award degree of Master of Philosophy (M. Phil) in
Chemistry.
Submitted by : Shweta
Enrollment No. : Mphil / 4148 / CHE / 2008J
Under the Guidance of : Dr. Ashok Kumar Yadav

(By Shweta)
DECLARATION
I hereby declare that the thesis titled “A Study of Chemical Equilibrium” submitted
for the Master in Philosophy (M.Phil) is my original work and the dissertation has not
formed the basis or award of any degree, associationship, fellowship, or any other
similar title.
(Shweta)
Deponent
(By Shweta)
CERTIFICATE
It is certified that the thesis titled “A Study of Chemical Equilibrium” is a bonafide

research work carried out by Smt. Shweta a student of Master of Philosophy (M.Phil),
Chemistry, the Global Open University, Nagaland, during the academic year 2008-
2009 in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the award of degree of Master of
Philosophy (M.Phil) in Chemistry and that the dissertation has not formed from the
basis of the award of any previous degree, diploma, associateship, fellowship or
other similar title.
Dr. Ashok Kumar Yadav

(By Shweta)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
It gives me great pleasure to present the work before the esteemed university for kind
consideration and evaluation.
I thank my all teachers including Mr. K.K. Jha who have guided me in many ways in
writing the dissertation.
I specially thank Dr. Ashok Kumar Yadav, my guide and teacher without whose
encouragement and help I might have not written this dissertation.
(Shweta)
(By Shweta)
About the Thesis
The dissertation has been prepared under the guidance of Dr. Ashok Kumar Yadav. It
is my endeavor to present the work in easy and lucid language. Main topics are kept
in question answer format for better clarity. In respect of some topics summaries are
also given just following the concerned topic. All endeavors are made to present the
work without any error. However despite the best effort some error may creep in, for
this I heartily apologize.
(By Shweta)
Chemical change: how far, how fast?
Chemical change occurs when the atoms that make up one or more substances
rearrange themselves in such a way that new substances are formed. These substances
are the components of the chemical reaction system; those components which
decrease in quantity are called reactants, while those that increase are products.
A given chemical reaction system is defined by a balanced net chemical equation

which is conventionally written as
reactants → products
Chemical change is one of the two central concepts of chemical science, the other
being structure. The very origins of Chemistry itself are rooted in the observations of
transformations such as the combustion of wood, the freezing of water, and the
winning of metals from their ores that have always been a part of human experience.
It was, after all, the quest for some kind of constancy underlying change that led the
Greek thinkers of around 200 BCE to the idea of elements and later to that of the
atom. It would take almost 2000 years for the scientific study of matter to pick up
these concepts and incorporate them into what would emerge, in the latter part of the
19th century, as a modern view of chemical change.
The first thing we need to know about a chemical reaction represented by a balanced
equation is whether it can actually take place. If the reactants and products are all
substances capable of an independent existence, then the answer is always "yes", at
least in principle. This answer must always be qualified, however, by the following
two considerations:
• Does the reaction take place to a sufficient extent to produce useful (or
even detectable) quantities of products?
(By Shweta)
This refers to the thermodynamics (energetics) of the reaction, which

controls its tendency to occur. The concept of chemical equilibrium
which we treat in this chapter addresses this question directly. Later
on, in another part of the course, we will learn that the tendency of a
reaction to occur can be predicted entirely from the properties of the
reactants and products through the laws of thermodynamics. This is
the macroscopic aspect of chemical change in that it makes no
assumptions about the mechanistic details of how the atoms rearrange
themselves as the reactants are transformed into products.
• What is the mechanism of the reaction?
What happens, at the atomic or molecular level, when reactants are

transformed into products? What intermediate species (those that are
produced but later consumed so that they do not appear in the net
reaction equation) are involved? This is the microscopic, or kinetic
view of chemical change, and unlike the macroscopic aspects
described in the preceding paragraph, cannot be predicted by theory as
it is presently developed and must be inferred from the results of
experiments. The variable we commonly observe that relates to the
kinetics of a reaction is the rate at which it takes place. These rates can
be extremely high (a mole per microsecond) or very low (a mole per
year), and they are very frequently indistinguishable from zero. The
rate of a given reaction can be highly influenced by factors such as
particle size, the presence of a catalyst, or in some cases even the
shape of the container.
A reaction that is thermodynamically possible but for which no reasonably rapid

mechanism is available is said to be kinetically limited. Conversely, one that occurs
rapidly but only to a small extent is thermodynamically limited. As we will see later,
(By Shweta)
there are often ways of getting around both kinds of limitations, and their discovery
and practical applications constitute an important area of industrial chemistry.
Next page will describe about equilibrium.

(By Shweta)
What is Equilibrium?
Basically, the term refers to what we might call a "balance of forces". In the case of
mechanical equilibrium, this is its literal definition. A book sitting on a table top
remains at rest because the downward force exerted by the earth's gravity acting on
the book's mass (this is what is meant by the "weight" of the book) is exactly
balanced by the repulsive force between atoms that prevents two objects from
simultaneously occupying the same space, acting in this case between the table
surface and the book. If we pick up the book and raise it above the table top, the
additional upward force exerted by our arm destroys the state of equilibrium as the
book moves upward. If we wish to hold the book at rest above the table, we adjust the
upward force to exactly balance the weight of the book, thus restoring equilibrium.
An object is in a state of mechanical equilibrium when it is either static (motionless)
or in a state of unchanging motion. From the relation f = ma , it is apparent that if the
net force on the object is zero, its acceleration must also be zero, so if we can see that
an object is not undergoing a change in its motion, we know that it is in mechanical
equilibrium.
Another kind of equilibrium we all experience is thermal equilibrium. When two

objects are brought into contact, heat will flow from the warmer object to the cooler
one until their temperatures become identical. Thermal equilibrium is a "balance of
forces" in the sense that temperature is a measure of the tendency of an object to lose
thermal energy. A metallic object at room temperature will feel cool to our hand
when we first pick it up because the thermal sensors in our skin detect a flow of heat
from our hand into the metal, but as the metal approaches the temperature of our
hand, this sensation diminishes. The time it takes to achieve thermal equilibrium
depends on how readily heat is conducted within and between the objects; thus a
wooden object will feel warmer than a metallic object even if both are at room
temperature because wood is a relatively poor thermal conductor and will therefore
(By Shweta)
remove heat from our hand more slowly. Thermal equilibrium is something we often
want to avoid, or at least postpone; this is why we insulate buildings, perspire in the
summer and wear heavier clothing in the winter.
Next page will describe as to what is “chemical equilibrium.”

(By Shweta)
What is Chemical Equilibrium?
When a chemical reaction takes place in a container which prevents the entry or
escape of any of the substances involved in the reaction, the quantities of these
components change as some are consumed and others are formed. Eventually this
change will come to an end, after which the composition will remain unchanged as
long as the system remains undisturbed. The system is then said to be in its
equilibrium state, or more simply, "at equilibrium".
“A chemical reaction is in equilibrium when there is no tendency for the quantities of

reactants and products to change.”
The direction in which we write a chemical reaction (and thus which components are
considered reactants and which are products) is arbitrary. Thus the two equations
H2 + I2 → 2 HI "synthesis of hydrogen iodide"
2 HI → H2 + I2 "dissociation of hydrogen iodide"
represent the same chemical reaction system in which the roles of the components are
reversed, and both yield the same mixture of components when the change is
completed.
This last point is central to the concept of chemical equilibrium. It makes no

difference whether we start with two moles of HI or one mole each of H2 and I2; once
the reaction has run to completion, the quantities of these two components will be the
same. In general, then, we can say that the composition of a chemical reaction
system will tend to change in a direction that brings it closer to its equilibrium
composition. Once this equilibrium composition has been attained, no further change
(By Shweta)
in the quantities of the components will occur as long as the system remains
undisturbed.
It's the same both ways
The two diagrams below show how the concentrations of the three components of this
chemical reaction change with time (under the conditions in which this particular
reaction is usually carried out, the time scale is typically 10 to 100 minutes.) Examine
the two sets of plots carefully, noting which substances have zero initial
concentrations, and are thus "products" of the reaction equations shown. Satisfy
ourself that these two sets represent the same chemical reaction system, but with the
reactions occurring in opposite directions. Most importantly, note how the final
(equilibrium) concentrations of the components are the same in the two cases.
The equilibrium state is independent of the direction from which it is approached.

Whether we start with an equimolar mixture of H2 and I2 (left) or a pure sample of
hydrogen iodide (shown on the right, using twice the initial concentration of HI to keep
the number of atoms the same), the composition after equilibrium is attained (shaded
regions on the right) will be the same.
(By Shweta)
What is a reversible reaction?

A chemical equation of the form A → B represents the transformation of A into B,
but it does not imply that all of the reactants will be converted into products, or that
the reverse reaction B → A cannot also occur.
In general, both processes (forward and reverse) can be expected to occur, resulting in
an equilibrium mixture containing finite amounts of all of the components of the
reaction system. (We use the word components when we do not wish to distinguish
between reactants and products.)
If the equilibrium state is one in which significant quantities of both reactants and
products are present (as in the hydrogen iodide example given above), then the
reaction is said to incomplete or reversible.
The latter term is preferable because it avoids confusion with "complete" in its other
sense of being finished, implying that the reaction has run its course and is now at
equilibrium.
If it is desired to emphasize the reversibility of a reaction, the single arrow in the

equation is replaced with a pair of hooked lines pointing in opposite directions, as in
A B. There is no fundamental difference between the meanings of A → B and
A B, however. Some older textbooks even use A = B.
A reaction is said to be complete when the equilibrium composition contains no

significant amount of the reactants. However, a reaction that is complete when written
in one direction is said "not to occur" when written in the reverse direction.
In principle, all chemical reactions are reversible, but this reversibility may not be
observable if the fraction of products in the equilibrium mixture is very small, or if
the reverse reaction is kinetically inhibited (very slow.)
(By Shweta)
How did Napoleon Bonaparte help discover reversible

reactions?
We can thank Napoleon for bringing the concept of reaction reversibility to
Chemistry. Napoleon recruited the eminent French chemist Claude Louis Berthollet
(1748-1822) to accompany him as scientific advisor on the most far-flung of his
campaigns, the expedition into Egypt in 1798. Once in Egypt, Berthollet noticed
deposits of sodium carbonate around the edges of some the salt lakes found there. He
was already familiar with the reaction
Na2CO3 + CaCl2 → CaCO3 + 2 NaCl
which was known to proceed to completion in the laboratory. He immediately

realized that the Na2CO3 must have been formed by the reverse of this process
brought about by the very high concentration of salt in the slowly-evaporating waters.
This led Berthollet to question the belief of the time that a reaction could only
proceed in a single direction. His famous textbook Essai de statique chimique (1803)
presented his speculations on chemical affinity and his discovery that an excess of the
product of a reaction could drive it in the reverse direction. Unfortunately, Berthollet
got a bit carried away by the idea that a reaction could be influenced by the amounts
of substances present, and maintained that the same should be true for the
compositions of individual compounds. This brought him into conflict with the
recently accepted Law of Definite Proportions (that a compound is made up of fixed
numbers of its constituent atoms), so his ideas (the good along with the bad) were
promptly discredited and remained largely forgotten for 50 years. (Ironically, it is
now known that certain classes of compounds do in fact exhibit variable composition
of the kind that Berthollet envisioned.)
(By Shweta)
What is the Law of Mass Action?
Berthollet's ideas about reversible reactions were finally vindicated by experiments

carried out by others, most notably the Norwegian chemists (and brothers-in-law)
Cato Guldberg and Peter Waage. During the period 1864-1879 they showed that an
equilibrium can be approached from either direction (see the hydrogen iodide
illustration above), implying that any reaction
aA + bB → cC + dD is really a competition between a "forward" and a "reverse"
reaction. When a reaction is at equilibrium, the rates of these two reactions are
identical, so no net (macroscopic) change is observed, although individual
components are actively being transformed at the microscopic level.
Guldberg and Waage showed that the rate of the reaction in either direction is
proportional to what they called the "active masses" of the various components:
in which the proportionality constants k are called rate constants and the quantities in
square brackets represent concentrations. If we combine the two reactants A and B,
the forward reaction starts immediately; then, as the products C and D begin to build
up, the reverse process gets underway. As the reaction proceeds, the rate of the
forward reaction diminishes while that of the reverse reaction increases. Eventually
the two processes are proceeding at the same rate, and the reaction is at equilibrium:
Rate of Forward Reaction = Rate of Reverse Reaction

(By Shweta)
How do we know when a reaction is at equilibrium?
Clearly, if we observe some change taking place— a change in color, the emission of
gas bubbles, the appearance of a precipitate, or the release of heat, we know the
reaction is not at equilibrium. However, the absence of any sign of change does not
by itself establish that the reaction is at equilibrium, which is defined above as the
lack of any tendency for change to occur; "tendency" is not a property that is directly
observable! Consider, for example, the reaction representing the synthesis of water
from its elements:
2 H2 + O2 → 2 H2O
We can store the two gaseous reactants in the same container indefinitely without any
observable change occurring. But if we create an electrical spark in the container or
introduce a flame, bang! After we pick ourselves up off the floor and remove the
shrapnel from what's left of our body, we will know very well that the system was not
initially at equilibrium! It happens that this particular reaction has a tremendous
tendency to take place, but for reasons that we will discuss in a later chapter, nothing
can happen until we "set it off" in some way- in this case by exposing the mixture to a
flame, or (in a more gentle way) by introducing a platinum wire, which acts as a
catalyst. A reaction of this kind is said to be highly favored thermodynamically,
but inhibited kinetically. The hydrogen iodide reaction, by contrast, is only
moderately favored thermodynamically (that's why it is incomplete), but its kinetics
are reasonably facile.
It is almost always the case, however, that once a reaction actually starts, it will
continue on its own until it reaches equilibrium, so if we can observe the change as it
occurs and see it slow down and stop, we can be reasonably certain that the system is
in equilibrium. This is by far the chemist's most common criterion.
(By Shweta)
There is one other experimental test for equilibrium in a chemical reaction, although
it is really only applicable to the kind of reactions we described above as being
reversible. As we shall see later, the equilibrium state of a system is always sensitive
to the temperature, and often to the pressure, so any changes in these variables,
however, small, will temporarily disrupt the equilibrium, resulting in an observable
change in the composition of the system as it moves toward its new equilibrium state.
Similarly, addition or removal of one component of the reaction will affect the
amounts of all the others. If carrying out any of these operations fails to produce an
observable change, then it is likely that the reaction is kinetically inhibited and that
the system is not at equilibrium.
Make sure we thoroughly understand the following essential ideas which have been
presented above. It is especially important that we know the precise meanings of all
the highlighted terms in the context of this topic.
• Any reaction that can be represented by a balanced chemical equation can take
place, at least
In principle. However, there are two important qualifications:
• The tendency for the change to occur may be so small that the quantity of
products formed may be very low, and perhaps negligible. A reaction of this
kind is said to be thermodynamically inhibited. The tendency for chemical
change is governed solely by the properties of the reactants and products, and
can be predicted by applying the laws of thermodynamics.
• The rate at which the reaction proceeds may be very small or even zero, in
which case we say the reaction is kinetically inhibited. Reaction rates depend
on the mechanism of the reaction— that is, on what actually happens to the
atoms as reactants are transformed into products. Reaction mechanisms cannot
(By Shweta)
generally be predicted, and must be worked out experimentally. Also, the

same reaction may have different mechanisms under different conditions.
• As a chemical change proceeds, the quantities of the components on one side

of the reaction equation will decrease, and those on the other side will
increase. Eventually the reaction slows down and the composition of the
system stops changing. At this point the reaction is in its equilibrium state,
and no further change in composition will occur as long as the system is left
undisturbed.
• For many reactions, the equilibrium state is one in which components on both
sides of the equation (that is, both reactants and products) are present in
significant amounts. Such a reaction is said to be incomplete or reversible.
The equilibrium composition is independent of the direction from which it is

approached; the labeling of substances as "reactants" or "products" is entirely a
matter of convenience. (See the hydrogen iodide reaction plots above.)
The law of mass action states that any chemical change is a competition between a
forward reaction (left-to-right in the chemical equation) and a reverse reaction. The
rate of each of these processes is governed by the concentrations of the substances
reacting; as the reaction proceeds, these rates approach each other and at equilibrium
they become identical.
(By Shweta)
From the above, it follows that equilibrium is a dynamic process in which

microscopic change (the forward and reverse reactions) continues to occur, but
macroscopic change (changes in the quantities of substances) is absent.
When a chemical reaction is at equilibrium, any disturbance of the system, such as a

change in temperature, or addition or removal of one of the reaction components, will
"shift" the composition to a new equilibrium state. This is the only unambiguous way
of verifying that a reaction is at equilibrium. The fact that the composition remains
static does not in itself prove that a reaction is at equilibrium, because the change may
be kinetically inhibited.
(By Shweta)
What is the le Châtelier Principle and why is it

important?
If a reaction is at equilibrium and we alter the conditions so as to create a new
equilibrium state, then the composition of the system will tend to change until that
new equilibrium state is attained. (We say "tend to change" because if the reaction is
kinetically inhibited, the change may be too slow to observe or it may never take
place.) In 1884, the French chemical engineer and teacher Henri le Châtelier (1850-
1936) showed that in every such case, the new equilibrium state is one that partially
reduces the effect of the change that brought it about.
This law is known to every Chemistry student as the le Châtelier principle. His
original formulation was somewhat complicated, but a reasonably useful paraphrase
of it reads as follows:
le Châtelier principle: If a system at equilibrium is subjected to a change of

pressure, temperature, or the number of moles of a component, there will be a
tendency for a net reaction in the direction that reduces the effect of this change.
To see how this works (and we must do so, as this is of such fundamental importance
that we simply cannot do any meaningful Chemistry without a thorough working
understanding of this principle), look again at the hydrogen iodide dissociation
reaction
2 HI H2 + I2
Consider an arbitrary mixture of these components at equilibrium, and assume that

we inject more hydrogen gas into the container. Because the H2 concentration now
exceeds its new equilibrium value, the system is no longer in its equilibrium state, so
a net reaction now ensues as the system moves to the new state. The le Châtelier
(By Shweta)
principle states that the net reaction will be in a direction that tends to reduce the
effect of the added H2. This can occur if some of the H2 is consumed by reacting with
I2 to form more HI; in other words, a net reaction occurs in the reverse direction.
Chemists usually simply say that "the equilibrium shifts to the left".
To get a better idea of how this works, carefully examine the diagram below
which follows the concentrations of the three components of this reaction as they
might change in time (the time scale here will typically be about an hour):
Disruption and restoration of equilibrium. At the left, the concentrations of

the three components do not change with time because the system is at
equilibrium. We then add more hydrogen to the system, disrupting the
equilibrium. A net reaction then ensues that moves the system to a new
equilibrium state (right) in which the quantity of hydrogen iodide has increased;
in the process, some of the I2 and H2 are consumed. Notice that the new
equilibrium state contains more hydrogen than did the initial state, but not as
much as was added; as the le Châtelier principle predicts, the change we made
(addition of H2) has been partially counteracted by the "shift to the right".
The following table contains several examples showing how changing the quantity of
a reaction component can shift an established equilibrium.
(By Shweta)
system change result

Shift to the right.
a drying agent is added to Continuous removal of a
CO2 + H2 H2O(g) + CO
absorb H2O product will force any
reaction to the right
No change; N2 is not a
component of this
H2(g) + I2(g) 2HI(g) Some nitrogen gas is added reaction system.
Because HCl is a gas

that can escape from the
system, the reaction is
NaCl(s) + H2SO4(l) reaction is carried out in an
forced to the right. This
Na2SO4(s) + HCl(g) open container
is the basis for the
commercial production
of hydrochloric acid.
Continuous removal of
water vapor forces the
water evaporates from an open
H2O(l) H2O(g) reaction to the right, so
container
equilibrium is never
achieved.
Shift to right; the
product [H+][CN—]
HCN(aq) H+(aq) + CN–(aq) the solution is diluted
diminishes more rapidly
than does [HCN].
Shift to left due to
increase in Cl–
some NaCl is added to the
AgCl(s) Ag+(aq) + Cl–(aq) concentration. This is
solution
known as the common
ion effect on solubility.
>No change. Catalysts
affect only the rate of a
a catalyst is added to speed up reaction; the have no
N2 + 3 H2 2 NH3
this reaction effect at all on the
composition of the
equilibrium state.
The le Châtelier principle in physiology:
(By Shweta)
Oxygen transport and carbon monoxide poisoning.
Many of the chemical reactions that occur in living organisms are regulated
through the le Châtelier principle. Few of these are more important to warm-
blooded organisms than those that relate to aerobic respiration, in which oxygen is
transported to the cells where it is combined with glucose and metabolized to
carbon dioxide, which then moves back to the lungs from which it is expelled.
hemoglobin + O2 oxyhemoglobin
The partial pressure of O2 in the air is 0.2 atm, sufficient to allow these molecules
to be taken up by hemoglobin (the red pigment of blood) in which it becomes
loosely bound in a complex known as oxyhemoglobin. At the ends of the
capillaries which deliver the blood to the tissues, the O2 concentration is reduced
by about 50% owing to its consumption by the cells. This shifts the equilibrium to
the left, releasing the oxygen so it can diffuse into the cells.
Carbon dioxide reacts with water to form a weak acid H2CO3 which would cause
the blood pH to fall to dangerous levels if it were not promptly removed as it is
excreted by the cells. This is accomplished by combining it with carbonate ion
through the reaction
H2CO3 + CO32– 2 HCO3–
which is forced to the right by the high local CO2 concentration within the tissues.
Once the hydrogen carbonate (bicarbonate) ions reach the lung tissues where the
CO2 partial pressure is much smaller, the reaction reverses and the CO2 is
expelled.
Carbon monoxide poisoning. Carbon monoxide, a product of incomplete

combustion that is present in automotive exhaust and cigarette smoke, binds to
hemoglobin 200 times more tightly than does O2. This blocks the uptake and
transport of oxygen by setting up a competing equilibrium
O2-hemoglobin hemoglobin CO-hemoglobin
Air that contains as little as 0.1 percent carbon monoxide can tie up about half of
the hemoglobin binding sites, reducing the amount of O2 reaching the tissues to
fatal levels. Carbon monoxide poisoning is treated by administration of pure O2
which promotes the shift of the above equilibrium to the left. This can be made
even more effective by placing the victim in a hyperbaric chamber in which the
pressure of O2 can be made greater than 1 atm.
(By Shweta)
How do changes in temperature affect equilibria?
Virtually all chemical reactions are accompanied by the liberation or uptake of heat.
If we regard heat as a "reactant" or "product" in an endothermic or exothermic
reaction respectively, we can use the le Châtelier principle to predict the direction in
which an increase or decrease in temperature will shift the equilibrium state. Thus for
the oxidation of nitrogen, an endothermic process, we can write
[heat] + N2 + O2 2 NO
Suppose this reaction is at equilibrium at some temperature T1 and we raise the

temperature to T2. The le Châtelier principle tells us that a net reaction will occur in
the direction that will partially counteract this change, meaning that the system must
absorb some of this additional heat, and the equilibrium will shift to the right.
Nitric oxide, the product of this reaction, is a major air pollutant which initiates a
sequence of steps leading to the formation of atmospheric smog. Its formation is an
unwanted side reaction which occurs when the air (which is introduced into the
combustion chamber of an engine to supply oxygen) gets heated to a high
temperature. Designers of internal combustion engines now try, by various means, to
limit the temperature in the combustion region, or to restrict its highest-temperature
part to a small volume within the combustion chamber.
(By Shweta)
How do changes in pressure affect equilibria?
We will recall that if the pressure of a gas is reduced, its volume will increase;
pressure and volume are inversely proportional. With this in mind, suppose that the
reaction
2 NO2(g) N2O4(g)
is in equilibrium at some arbitrary temperature and pressure, and that we double the
pressure, perhaps by compressing the mixture to a smaller volume. From the le
Châtelier principle we know that the equilibrium state will change to one that tends to
counteract the increase in pressure. This can occur if some of the NO2 reacts to form
more of the dinitrogen tetroxide, since two moles of gas is being removed from the
system for every mole of N2O4 formed, thereby decreasing the total volume of the
system. Thus increasing the pressure will shift this equilibrium to the right.
It is important to understand that the changing the pressure will have a significant
effect only on reactions in which there is a change in the number of moles of gas. For
the above reaction, this change
∆ng = (nproducts – nreactants) = 1 – 2 = –1.
In the case of the nitrogen oxidation reaction described previously, –ng = 0 and
pressure will have no effect.
The volumes of solids and liquids are hardly affected by the pressure at all, so for
reactions that do not involve gaseous substances, the effects of pressure changes are
ordinarily negligible. Exceptions arise under conditions of very high pressure such as
exist in the interior of the Earth or near the bottom of the ocean. A good example is
(By Shweta)
the dissolution of calcium carbonate CaCO3(s) Ca2+ + CO32–. There is a slight

decrease in the volume when this reaction takes place, so an increase in the pressure
will shift the equilibrium to the right, so that calcium carbonate becomes more soluble
at higher pressures.
The skeletons of several varieties of microscopic organisms that inhabit the top of the
ocean are made of CaCO3, so there is a continual rain of this substance toward the
bottom of the ocean as these organisms die. As a consequence, the floor of the
Atlantic Ocean is covered with a blanket of calcium carbonate. This is not true for the
Pacific Ocean, which is deeper; once the skeletons fall below a certain depth, the
higher pressure causes them to dissolve. Some of the seamounts (undersea mountains)
in the Pacific extend above the solubility boundary so that their upper parts are
covered with CaCO3 sediments.
The effect of pressure on a reaction involving substances whose boiling points fall
within the range of commonly encountered temperature will be sensitive to the states
of these substances at the temperature of interest.
For reactions involving gases, only changes in the partial pressures of those gases
directly involved in the reaction are important; the presence of other gases has no
effect.
Example 1
The commercial production of hydrogen is carried out by treating natural gas with
steam at high temperatures and in the presence of a catalyst (“steam reforming of
methane”):
CH4 + H2O CH3OH + H2

(By Shweta)
Given the following boiling points: CH4 (methane) = –161°C, H2O = 100°C, CH3OH
= 65°, H2 = –253°C, predict the effects of an increase in the total pressure on this
equilibrium at 50°, 75° and 120°C.
Solution: Calculate the change in the moles of gas for each process:
temp equation ∆ng shift

50° CH4(g) + H2O(l) CH3OH(l) + H2(g) 0 none
75° CH4(g) + H2O(l) CH3OH(g) + H2(g) +1 to left
120° CH4(g) + H2O(g) CH3OH(g) + H2(g) 0 none
(By Shweta)
What is the Haber process and why is it important?

The Haber process for the synthesis of ammonia is based on the exothermic reaction
N2(g) + 3 H2(g) 2 NH3(g)
The le Châtelier principle tells us that in order to maximize the amount of product in
the reaction mixture, it should be carried out at high pressure and low temperature.
However, the lower the temperature, the slower the reaction (this is true of virtually
all chemical reactions.) As long as the choice had to be made between a low yield of
ammonia quickly or a high yield over a long period of time, this reaction was
infeasible economically.
Nitrogen is available for free, being the major component of air, but the strong triple
bond in N2 makes it extremely difficult to incorporate this element into species such
as NO3– and NH4+ which serve as the starting points for the wide variety of nitrogen-
containing compounds that are essential for modern industry. This conversion is
known as nitrogen fixation, and because nitrogen is an essential plant nutrient,
modern intensive agriculture is utterly dependent on huge amounts of fixed nitrogen
in the form of fertilizer. Until around 1900, the major source of fixed nitrogen was the
NaNO3 (Chile saltpeter) found in extensive deposits in South America. Several
chemical processes for obtaining nitrogen compounds were developed in the early
1900's, but they proved too inefficient to meet the increasing demand.
Although the direct synthesis of ammonia from its elements had been known for
some time, the yield of product was found to be negligible. In 1905, Fritz Haber
(1868-1934) began to study this reaction, employing the thinking initiated by le
Châtelier and others, and the newly-developing field of thermodynamics that served
as the basis of these principles. From the le Châtelier law alone, it is apparent that this
exothermic reaction is favored by low temperature and high pressure. However, it
was not as simple as that: the rate of any reaction increases with the temperature, so
(By Shweta)
working with temperature alone, one has the choice between a high product yield
achieved only very slowly, or a very low yield quickly. Further, the equipment and
the high-strength alloy steels need to build it did not exist at the time. Haber solved
the first problem by developing a catalyst that would greatly speed up the reaction at
lower temperatures.
The second problem, and the development of an efficient way of producing hydrogen,
would delay the practical implementation of the process until 1913, when the first
plant based on the Haber-Bosch process (as it is more properly known, Carl Bosch
being the person who solved the major engineering problems) came into operation.
The timing could not have been better for Germany, since this country was about to
enter the First World War, and the Allies had established a naval blockade of South
America, cutting off the supply of nitrate for the German munitions industry.
Bosch's plant operated the ammonia reactor at 200 atm and 550°C. Later, when
stronger alloy steels had been developed, pressures of 800-1000 atm became
common. The source of hydrogen in modern plants is usually natural gas, which is
mostly methane:
CH4 + H2O CO + 3 H2 formation of synthesis gas

CO + H2O CO2 + H2 shift reaction carried out in reformer
The Haber-Bosch process is considered the most important chemical synthesis

developed in the 20th century. Besides its scientific importance as the first large-scale
application of the laws of chemical equilibrium, it has had tremendous economic and
social impact; without an inexpensive source of fixed nitrogen, the intensive crop
production required to feed the world's growing population would have been
impossible. In 1918, Haber was awarded the 1918 Nobel Prize in Chemistry in
recognition of his work. Carl Bosch, who improved the process, won the Nobel Prize
in 1931.
(By Shweta)
Much has been written about some of the more controversial and tragic aspects of
Haber's life. Shown here are the major figures in the cast in the 2005 Vancouver
production of Vern Thiessen's play Einstein's Gift which centers on the conflict and
tragedy in Fritz Haber's life. His first wife, Clara, was his former student and a
chemist; Haber's decision to help Germany develop chlorine as a war gas led to her
suicide.
Summary
• A system in its equilibrium state will remain in that state indefinitely as long
as it is undisturbed. If the equilibrium is destroyed by subjecting the system to
a change of pressure, temperature, or the number of moles of a substance, then
a net reaction will tend to take place that moves the system to a new
equilibrium state. le Châtelier's principle says that this net reaction will occur
in a direction that partially offsets the change.
• The le Châtelier Principle has practical effect only for reactions in which
significant quantities of both reactants and products are present at
equilibrium— that is, for reactions that are thermodynamically reversible.
• Addition of more product substances to an equilibrium mixture will shift the
equilibrium to the left; addition of more reactant substances will shift it to the
right. These effects are easily explained in terms of competing forward- and
reverse reactions— that is, by the law of mass action.
(By Shweta)
• If a reaction is exothermic (releases heat), an increase in the temperature will

force the equilibrium to the left, causing the system to absorb heat and thus
partially offsetting the rise in temperature. The opposite effect occurs for
endothermic reactions, which are shifted to the right by rising temperature.
• The effect of pressure on equilibrium is significant only for reactions which
involve different numbers of moles of gases on the two sides of the equation.
If the number of moles of gases increases, than an increase in the total
pressure will tend to initiate a reverse reaction that consumes some the
products, partially reducing the effect of the pressure increase.
• The classic example of the practical use of the le Châtelier principle is the
Haber-Bosch process for the synthesis of ammonia, in which a balance
between low temperature and high pressure must be found.
(By Shweta)
What is the equilibrium quotient?
In the previous section we defined the equilibrium expression for the reaction
aA+bB→cC+dD as
In the general case in which the concentrations can have any arbitrary values
(including zero), this expression is called the equilibrium quotient and its value is
denoted by Q (or Qc if we wish to emphasize that the terms represent molar
concentrations.) If the terms correspond to equilibrium concentrations, then the above
expression is called the equilibrium constant and its value is denoted by K (or Kc .)
K is thus the special value that Q has when the reaction is at equilibrium
The value of Q in relation to K serves as an index how the composition of the reaction
system compares to that of the equilibrium state, and thus it indicates the direction in
which any net reaction must proceed. For example, if we combine the two reactants A
and B at concentrations of 1 mol L–1 each, the value of Q will be 0÷1=0. If instead
our mixture consists only of the two products C and D, Q will be indeterminately
large (1÷0). It is easy to see (by simple application of the Le Châtelier principle) that
the ratio of Q/K immediately tells us whether, and in which direction, a net reaction
will occur as the system moves toward its equilibrium state. The three possibilities are
shown in the table below.
Q/K
Product concentration too high for equilibrium;

>1
net reaction proceeds to left.
=1 System is at equilibrium; no net change will occur.
<1 Product concentration too low for equilibrium;
(By Shweta)
net reaction proceeds to right.
It is very important that we be able to work out these relations for ourself, not by
memorizing them, but from the definitions of Q and K.
A visual way of thinking about Q and K
The formal definitions of Q and K are quite simple, but they are of limited usefulness
unless we are able to relate them to real chemical situations. The following diagrams
illustrate the relation between Q and K from various standpoints. Take some time to
study each one carefully, making sure that we are able to relate the description to the
illustration.
Each tiny dot on the graph represents a possible combination of NO2 and N2O4
concentrations that produce a certain value of Q for the chemical reaction system
N2O4 2 NO2. (There are of course an infinite number of possible Q's of this system
within the concentration boundaries shown on the plot.) Only those dots that fall on
the red line correspond to equilibrium states of this system (those for which Q = K ).
The line itself is a plot of [NO2] = ([N2O4]K)0.5. If the system is initially in a non-
equilibrium state, its composition will change in a direction that moves it to one on
the line.
One of the simplest equilibria we can write is that between a solid and its vapor.
Using the sublimation of iodine I2(s) I2 (g) as an example, we see that the possible
equilibrium states of the system (shaded area in the diagram) are limited to those in
which at least some solid is present, but that within this region, the quantity of iodine
(By Shweta)
vapor is constant (red line) as long as the temperature is unchanged. The arrow shows
the succession of states the system passes through when 0.29 mole of solid iodine is
placed in a 1-L sealed container; the unit slope of this line reflects the fact that each
mole of I2 removed from the solid ends up in the vapor.
The decomposition of ammonium chloride

NH4Cl(s) NH3(g) + HCl(g) is another
example of a solid-gas equilibrium. Arrow 1
traces the states the system passes through
when solid NH4Cl is placed in a closed
container. Arrow 2 represents the addition of
ammonia to the equilibrium mixture; the
system responds by following the path 3 back
to a new equilibrium state .which, as the
Le Châtelier principle predicts, contains a
smaller quantity of ammonia than was added. Lines 1 and 3 have unit slopes because
changes in the quantities of HCl and NH3 are identical when the system undergoes
any spontaneous change as it returns to an equilibrium state.
(By Shweta)
Does everything stop when equilibrium is reached?
When a reaction system is not at equilibrium, the quantities of reactants or products

will change until Q = K, at which point no further change will occur as long as the
system remains at the same temperature and pressure. So all net change does come to
an end when equilibrium is reached. But the absence of any net change does not
mean that nothing is happening! Since all reactions are reversible at least in principal,
we can regard an equilibrium A B as the sum of two processes
A B forward reaction ratef = kf [A]
B A reverse reaction rater= kr [B]
The expressions given in the rightmost column above simply reflect the fact that the
rate at which a substance undergoes change should be proportional to its
concentration; this is just another statement of the Law of Mass Action. The
proportionality constants kf and kr are the forward and reverse rate constants. If we
start with substance A alone, the absence of B means that the forward reaction alone
is proceeding. Then, as the concentration of B begins to build up, the reverse reaction
comes into operation, the rate of the forward reaction diminishes due to the reduction
in the concentration of B. At some point these two processes will come into exact
balance so that the forward and reverse rates are the same, at which point we can
write
and combine the k’s to obtain

(By Shweta)
thus showing that the equilibrium constant can in a sense be regarded as the resultant
of the two opposing rate constants. If the rate constant of the forward reaction
exceeds that of the reverse step, then the equilibrium state will be one in which the
product dominates. (Note carefully that although the two rate constants will generally
be different, the forward and reverse rates themselves will always be identical at
equilibrium.)
The preceding paragraph shows how the concept of the equilibrium constant follows
from the Law of Mass Action, but it is not a proper derivation of the formula for
equilibrium constants in general, which must be done through the laws of
thermodynamics.
The single most important idea for we to carry along with we from this section is that
equilibrium is a dynamic process in which the forward and reverse reactions are
continually opposing each other in a dead heat.
To see if we really understand this, try explaining to ourselves how the Le Châtelier
Principle as it applies to concentrations of reaction components follows directly from
the idea of opposing reaction steps.
Although it is the ratio of kf/kr that determines K, the magnitudes of these rate
constants also make a difference; if they are small (or as is often the case, zero) then
the reaction is kinetically inhibited and equilibrium will be achieved slowly or not at
all. When their values are large, equilibrium is achieved quickly; the equilibrium is
said to be facile and the reaction is fast. Sometimes a very slow equilibrium can be
made more facile in the presence of a suitable catalyst.
(By Shweta)
Summary
• When arbitrary quantities of the different components of a chemical reaction

system are combined, the overall system composition will not likely
correspond to the equilibrium composition. As a result, a net change in
composition ("a shift to the right or left") will tend to take place until the
equilibrium state is attained.
• The equilibrium state is characterised by the value of the equilibrium
expression, whose formulation is defined by the coefficients in the balanced
reaction equation; it may be expressed in terms of concentrations, or in the
case of gaseous components, as partial pressures.
• The various terms in the equilibrium expression can have any arbitrary value
(including zero); the value of the equilibrium expression itself is called the
equilibrium quotient Q.
• If the concentration or pressure terms in the equilibrium expression
correspond to the equilibrium state of the system, then Q has the special value
K, which we call the equilibrium constant.
• The ratio of Q/K thus serves as an index of how far the system is from its
equilibrium composition, and its sign indicates the direction in which the net
reaction must proceed in order to reach its equilibrium state.
• When this ratio is unity (Q = K), then the equilibrium state has been reached,
and no further net change will take place as long as the system remains
undisturbed.
(By Shweta)
Using concentration and pressure terms in

equilibrium expressions
Although we commonly write equilibrium quotients and equilibrium constants in

terms of molar concentrations, any concentration-like term can be used, including
mole fraction and modality. Sometimes the symbols Kc, Kx, and Km are used to denote
these forms of the equilibrium constant. Bear in mind that the numerical values of K’s
and Q’s expressed in these different ways will not generally be the same.
Most of the equilibria we deal with in this course occur in liquid solutions and
gaseous mixtures. We can express Kc values in terms of moles per liter for both, but
when dealing with gases it is often more convenient to use partial pressures. These
two measures of concentration are of course directly proportional:
so for a reaction A(g) B(g) we can write the equilibrium constant as
All of these forms of the equilibrium constant are only approximately correct,
working best at low concentrations or pressures. The only equilibrium constant that is
truly “constant” (except that it still varies with the temperature!) is expressed in terms
of activities, which we can think of as “effective concentrations” that allow for
interactions between molecules. In practice, this distinction only becomes important
(By Shweta)
for equilibria involving gases at very high pressures (such as are often encountered in
chemical engineering) and in ionic solutions more concentrated than about 0.001 M.
We will not deal much with activities in this course.
For a reaction such as CO2(g) + OH–(aq) → HCO3–(aq) that involves both gaseous
and dissolved components, a “hybrid” equilibrium constant is commonly used:
Clearly, it is essential to be sure of the units when we see an equilibrium constant

represented simply by "K".
Don't show unchanging concentrations!
Substances whose concentrations undergo no significant change in a chemical

reaction do not appear in equilibrium constant expressions.
How can the concentration of a reactant or product not change when a reaction
involving that substance takes place? There are two general cases to consider.
The substance is also the solvent
This happens all the time in acid-base chemistry. Thus for the hydrolysis of the
cyanide- ion
CN–+ H2O → HCN + OH–, we write
(By Shweta)
in which no [H2O] term appears. The justification for this omission is that water is
both the solvent and reactant, but only the tiny portion that acts as a reactant would
ordinarily go in the equilibrium expression. The amount of water consumed in the
reaction is so minute (because K is very small) that any change in the concentration of
H2O from that of pure water (55.6 mol L–1) will be negligible.
Be careful about throwing away H2O whenever we see it. In the etherification
reaction
CH3COOH + C2H5OH → CH3COOC2H5 + H2O
that we discussed in a previous section, a [H2O] term must be present in the

equilibrium expression if the reaction is assumed to be between the two liquids acetic
acid and ethanol. If, on the other hand, the reaction takes place between a dilute
aqueous solution of the acid and the alcohol, then the [H2O] term would not be
included.
The substance is a solid or a pure liquid phase.
This is most frequently seen in solubility equilibria, but there are many other
reactions in which solids are directly involved:
CaF2(s) → Ca2+(aq) + 2F–(aq)
Fe3O4(s) + 4 H2(g) → 4 H2O(g) + 3Fe(s)
These are heterogeneous reactions (meaning reactions in which some components are
in different phases), and the argument here is that concentration is only meaningful
when applied to a substance within a single phase. Thus the term [CaF2] would refer
to the “concentration of calcium fluoride within the solid CaF2", which is a constant
(By Shweta)
depending on the molar mass of CaF2 and the density of that solid. The
concentrations of the two ions will be independent of the quantity of solid CaF2 in
contact with the water; in other words, the system can be in equilibrium as long as
any CaF2 at all is present.
Throwing out the constant-concentration terms can lead to some rather sparse-looking
equilibrium expressions. For example, the equilibrium expression for each of the
processes shown in the following table consists solely of a single term involving the
partial pressure of a gas:
CaCO3(s) → Thermal decomposition of limestone, a first step in

CaO(s) + CO2(g) the manufacture of cement.
Na2SO4•10
Sodium sulfate decahydrate is a solid in which H2O
H2O(s) →
molecules (“waters of hydration") are incorporated
Na2SO4(s) + 10
into the crystal structure.)
H2O(g)
sublimation of solid iodine; this is the source of the
I2(s) → I2(g) purple vapor we can see above solid iodine in a
closed container.
Vaporization of water. When the partial pressure of
H2O(l) →
water vapor in the air is equal to K, the relative
H2O(g)
humidity is 100%.
The last two processes represent changes of state or phase equilibria which can be
treated exactly the same as chemical reactions. In each of the heterogeneous
processes shown in the table, the reactants and products can be in equilibrium (that is,
permanently coexist) only when the partial pressure of the gaseous product has the
value consistent with the indicated Kp. Bear in mind also that these Kp s all increase
with the temperature.
(By Shweta)
Example
What are the values of Kp for the equilibrium between liquid water and its vapor at
25°C, 100°C, and 120°C? The vapor pressure of water at these three temperatures is
23.8 torr, 760 torr (1 atm), and 1489 torr, respectively.
Comment: These vapor pressures are the partial pressures of water vapor in
equilibrium with the liquid, so they are identical with the Kp's when expressed in units
of atmospheres.
Solution:
25°C 100°C 120°C
This temperature The only way to heat water

The partial pressure of H2O
corresponds, of course, to above its normal boiling point
above the surface of liquid
the boiling point of water. is to do so in a closed
water in a closed container at
The normal boiling point container that can withstand
25°C will build up to this value.
of a liquid is the the increased vapor pressure.
If the cover is removed so that
temperature at which the Thus a pressure cooker that
this pressure cannot be
partial pressure of its operates at 120°C must be
maintained, the system will
vapor is 1 atm. designed to withstand an
cease to be at equilibrium and
internal pressure of at least
the water will evaporate.
2 atm.
Significance of the numerical value of an equilibrium constant
Our ability to interpret the numerical value of a quantity in terms of what it means in
a practical sense is an essential part of developing a working understanding of
Chemistry. This is particularly the case for equilibrium constants, whose values span
the entire range of the positive numbers. Although there is no explicit rule, for most
practical purposes we can say that equilibrium constants within the range of roughly
(By Shweta)
0.01 to 100 indicate that a chemically significant amount of all components of the
reaction system will be present in an equilibrium mixture and that the reaction will be
incomplete or “reversible”. As an equilibrium constant approaches the limits of zero
or infinity, the reaction can be increasingly characterized as a one-way process; we
say it is “complete” or “irreversible”. The latter term must of course not be taken
literally; the Le Châtelier principle still applies (especially insofar as temperature is
concerned), but addition or removal of reactants or products will have less effect.
Although it is by no means a general rule, it frequently happens that reactions having
very large or very small equilibrium constants are kinetically hindered, often to the
extent that the reaction essentially does not take place.
The examples in the following table are intended to show that numbers (values of K),
no matter how dull they may look, do have practical consequences!
reaction K remarks
5 10–31 at These two very different values of K illustrate very
N2(g) + O2(g) 25°C, nicely why reducing combustion-chamber
→ 2 NO(g) 0.0013 at temperatures in automobile engines is
2100°C environmentally friendly.
3 H2(g) +
7 105 at 25°C, See the discussion of this reaction in the section on
N2(g) → 2
56 at 1300°C the Haber process.
NH3(g)
10–36 at 25°C, Dissociation of any stable molecule into its atoms
H2(g) → 2
6 10–5 at is endothermic. This means that all molecules will
H(g)
5000° decompose at sufficiently high temperatures.
H2O(g) →
8 10–41 at we won’t find water a very good source of oxygen
H2(g) + ½
25°C gas at ordinary temperatures!
O2(g)
This tells us that acetic acid has a great tendency to
CH3COOH(l) decompose to carbon, but nobody has ever found
Kc = 1013 at
→ 2 H2O(l) + graphite (or diamonds!) forming in a bottle of
25°C
2 C(s) vinegar. A good example of a super kinetically-
hindered reaction!
(By Shweta)
Do equilibrium constants have units?
The equilibrium expression for the synthesis of ammonia

3 H2(g) + N2(g) → 2 NH3(g) is
so Kp and Qp for this process would appear to have units of atm–1, and Kc and Qc
would be expressed in mol–2 L2. And yet these quantities are often represented as
being dimensionless. Which is correct? The answer is that both forms are acceptable.
There are some situations (which we will encounter later) in which K’s must be
considered dimensionless, but in simply quoting the value of an equilibrium constant
it is permissible to include the units, and this may even be useful in order to remove
any doubt about the units of the individual terms in equilibrium expressions
containing both pressure and concentration terms. In carrying out our own
calculations, however, there is rarely any real need to show the units.
Strictly speaking, equilibrium expressions do not have units because the
concentration or pressure terms that go into them are really ratios having the forms(n
mol L–1)/(1 mol L–1) or (n atm)/(1 atm) in which the unit quantity in the denominator
refers to the standard state of the substance; thus the units always cancel out. For
substances that are liquids or solids, the standard state is just the concentration of the
substance within the liquid or solid, so for something like CaF2(s), the term going into
the equilibrium expression is [CaF2]/[CaF2] which cancels to unity; this is the reason
(By Shweta)
we don’t need to include terms for solid or liquid phases in equilibrium expressions.
The subject of standard states would take us somewhat beyond where we need to be
at this point in the course, so we will simply say that the concept is made necessary
by the fact that energy, which ultimately governs chemical change, is always relative
to some arbitrarily defined zero value which, for chemical substances, is the standard
state.
Equilibrium expressions and the reaction equation

It is important to remember that an equilibrium quotient or constant is always tied to a
specific chemical equation, and if we write the equation in reverse or multiply its
coefficients by a common factor, the value of Q or K will be different.
The rules are very simple:
• Writing the equation in reverse will invert the equilibrium expression;
• Multiplying the coefficients by a common factor will raise Q or K to the

corresponding power.
Here are some of the possibilities for the reaction involving the equilibrium between
gaseous water and its elements:
2 H2 + O2→ 2 H2O(g) 10 H2 + 5 O2 → 5 H2O(g) H2 + ½ O2 → H2O(g) H2O(g) → H2 + ½ O2

(By Shweta)
Heterogeneous reactions: the vapor pressure of solid

hydrates
Heterogeneous reactions are those

involving more than one phase. Some
examples:
air-oxidation of metallic iron (formation of

rust)
Fe(s) + O2(g) → FeO2(s)
dissolution of calcium fluoride in water

CaF2(s) → Ca(aq) + F+(aq)
sublimation of ice (a phase change)

H2O(s) → H2O(g)
formation of carbon dioxide gas from

NaHCO3(s) + H+(aq) → CO2(g) + sodium bicarbonate when water is added to
Na+(aq) + H2O(g) baking powder (the hydrogen ions come
from tartaric acid, the other component of
(By Shweta)
baking powder.)
A particularly interesting type of heterogeneous reaction is one in which a solid is in

equilibrium with a gas. The sublimation of ice illustrated in the above table is a very
common example. The equilibrium constant for this process is simply the partial
pressure of water vapor in equilibrium with the solid— the vapor pressure of the ice.
Many common inorganic salts form solids which incorporate water molecules into
their crystal structures. These water molecules are usually held rather loosely and can
escape as water vapor. Copper(II) sulfate, for example forms a pentahydrate in which
four of the water molecules are coordinated to the Cu2+ ion while the fifth is
hydrogen-bonded to SO42–. This latter water is more tightly bound, so that the
pentahydrate loses water in two stages on heating:
These dehydration steps are carried out at the temperatures indicated above, but at
any temperature, some moisture can escape from a hydrate. For the complete
dehydration of the pentahydrate we can define an equilibrium constant
CuSO4·5H2O(s) → CuSO4(s) + 5 H2O(g) Kp = 1.14 10–10

(By Shweta)
The vapor pressure of the hydrate (for this reaction) is the partial pressure of water
vapor at which the two solids can coexist indefinitely; its value is Kp1/5 atm. If a
hydrate is exposed to air in which the partial pressure of water vapor is less than its
vapor pressure, the reaction will proceed to the right and the hydrate will lose
moisture. Vapor pressures always increase with temperature, so any of these
compounds can be dehydrated by heating.
Loss of water usually causes a breakdown in the structure of the crystal; this is
commonly seen with sodium sulfate, whose vapor pressure is sufficiently large that it
can exceed the partial pressure of water vapor in the air when the relative humidity is
low. What one sees is that the well-formed crystals of the decahydrate undergo
deterioration into a powdery form, a phenomenon known as efflorescence. When a
solid is able to take up moisture from the air, it is described as hygroscopic. A small
number of anhydrous solids that have low vapor pressures not only take up
atmospheric moisture on even the driest of days, but will become wet as water
molecules are adsorbed onto their surfaces; this is most commonly observed with
sodium hydroxide and calcium chloride. With these solids, the concentrated solution
that results continues to draw in water from the air so that the entire crystal eventually
dissolves into a puddle of its own making; solids exhibiting this behavior are said to
be deliquescent.
vapor pressure, torr

name formula
25°C 30°C
sodium sulfate decahydrate Na2SO4·10H2O 19.2 25.3
copper(II) sulfate pentahydrate CuSO4·5H2O 7.8 12.5
calcium chloride monohydrate CaCl2·H2O 3.1 5.1
(water) H2O 23.5 31.6
Example
(By Shweta)
At what relative humidity will copper sulfate pentahydrate lose its waters of hydration
when the air temperature is 30°C? What is Kp for this process at this temperature?
Solution: From the table above, we see that the vapor pressure of the hydrate is 12.5
torr, which corresponds to a relative humidity (we remember what this is, don’t we?)
of 12.5/31.6 = 0.40 or 40%. This is the humidity that will be maintained if the hydrate
is placed in a closed container of dry air
For this hydrate, Kp = P(H2O)0.5, so the partial pressure of water vapor that will be in
equilibrium with the hydrate and the dehydrated solid (remember that both solids
must be present to have equilibrium!), expressed in atmospheres, will be (12.5/760)5
= 1.20E-9.
One of the first hydrates investigated in detail was calcium sulfate hemihydrate
(CaSO4·½ H2O) which LeChâtelier (he of the “principle”) showed to be the hardened
form of CaSO4 known as plaster of Paris. Anhydrous CaSO4 forms compact,
powdery crystals, whereas the elongated crystals of the hydrate bind themselves into
a cement-like mass.
(By Shweta)
How can we find the equilibrium constant for a series

of reactions?
Many chemical changes can be regarded as the sum or difference of two or more
other reactions. If we know the equilibrium constants of the individual processes, we
can easily calculate that for the overall reaction according to this rule:
The equilibrium constant for the sum of two or more reactions

is the product of the equilibrium constants for each of the steps.
Example
Given the following equilibrium constants:
CaCO3(s) → Ca2+(aq) + CO32–(aq) K1 = 10–6.3

HCO3–(aq) → H+(aq) + CO32–(aq) K2 = 10–10.3
Calculate the value of K for the reaction CaCO3(s) + H+(aq) → Ca2+(aq) + HCO3–(aq)
Solution: The net reaction is the sum of reaction 1 and the reverse of reaction 2:
2+ 2– –6.3
CaCO3(s) → Ca (aq) + CO3 (aq) K1 = 10
+ 2– – –(–10.3)
H (aq) + CO3 (aq) → HCO3 (aq) K–2 = 10
+ 2+ – (-8.4+10.3) +1.9
CaCO3(s) + H (aq) → Ca (aq) + HCO3 (aq) K = K1/K2 = 10 = 10
Comment: This net reaction describes the dissolution of limestone by acid; it is

responsible for the eroding effect of acid raine on buildings and statues. This an
example of a reaction that has practically no tendency to take place by itself (small
K1) being "driven" by a second reaction having a large equilibrium constant (K–2).
From the standpoint of the LeChâtelier principle, the first reaction is "pulled to the
right" by the removal of carbonate by hydrogen ion. Coupled reactions of this type
(By Shweta)
are widely encountered in all areas of chemistry, and especially in biochemistry, in

which a dozen or so reactions may be linked.
The individual coupled reactions do not need to actually take place in the overall
process; very frequently we use their equilibrium constants in order to calculate the
equilibrium constant of another reaction.
Problem Example 4
The synthesis of HBr from hydrogen and liquid bromine has an equilibrium constant
Kp = 4.5¥1015 at 25°C. Given that the vapor pressure of liquid bromine is 0.28 atm,
find Kp for the homogeneous gas-phase reaction at the same temperature.
Solution: The net reaction we seek is the sum of the heterogeneous synthesis of HBr
and the reverse of the vaporization of liquid bromine:
H2(g) + Br2(l) → 2 HBr(g) Kp = 4.5 1015

Br2(g) → Br2(l) Kp = (0.28)–1
H2(g) + Br2(g) → 2 HBr(g) Kp = 1.6 1019
Summary
• The equilibrium quotient Q is the value of the equilibrium expression of a

reaction for any arbitrary set of concentrations or partial pressures of the
reaction components.
• The equilibrium constant K is the value of Q when the reaction is at
equilibrium. K has a unique value for a given reaction at a fixed temperature
and pressure.
(By Shweta)
• Q and K can be expressed in terms of concentrations, partial pressures, or,

when appropriate, in some combination of these.
• For a reaction in which all the components are gases, Qc and Kc will have
different values except in the special case in which the total number of moles
of gas does not change.
• Concentration terms for substances whose concentrations do not change in the
reaction do not appear in equilibrium expressions. The most common
examples are [H2O] when the reaction takes place in aqueous solution (so that
[H2O] is effectively constant at 55.6 M), and in heterogeneous reactions
involving solids, in which the concentration of the solid is determined by the
density of the solid itself.
• A reaction whose equilibrium constant is in the range of about 0.01 to 100 is
said to be incomplete or [thermodynamically] reversible.
• Q and K are conventionally treated as dimensionless quantities, and need not
ordinarily have units associated with them.
• Heterogeneous reactions are those in which two or more phases are involved;
homogeneous reactions take place in a single phase. A common type of
heterogeneous reaction is the loss of water of crystallization by a solid hydrate
such as CuSO4·5H2O.
• The equilibrium expression can be manipulated and combined in the
following ways:
o If the reaction is written in reverse, Q becomes Q–1;
o If the coefficients of an equation are multiplied by n, Q becomes Qn;
o Q for the sum of two reactions (that is, for two reactions that take
place in sequence) is the product (Q1)(Q2).
(By Shweta)
Measuring and calculating equilibrium constants

Clearly, if the concentrations or pressures of all the components of a reaction are
known, then the value of K can be found by simple substitution. Observing individual
concentrations or partial pressures directly may be not always be practical, however.
If one of the components is colored, the extent to which it absorbs light of an
appropriate wavelength may serve as an index of its concentration. Pressure
measurements are ordinarily able to measure only the total pressure of a gaseous
mixture, so if two or more gaseous products are present in the equilibrium mixture,
the partial pressure of one may need to be inferred from that of the other, taking into
account the stoichiometry of the reaction.
Example
In an experiment carried out by Taylor and Krist (J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1941: 1377),
hydrogen iodide was found to be 22.3% dissociated at 730.8°K.
Calculate Kc for 2 HI(g) H2(g) + I2(g).
Solution:
No explicit molar concentrations are given, but we do know that for every n moles of
HI, 0.223n moles of each product is formed and (1–0.233)n = 0.777n moles of HI
remains. For simplicity, we assume that n=1 and that the reaction is carried out in a
1.00-L vessel, so that we can substitute the required concentration terms directly into
the equilibrium expression.
(By Shweta)
Example
Ordinary white phosphorus, P4, forms a vapor which dissociates into diatomic
molecules at high temperatures:
P4(g) 2 P2(g)
A sample of white phosphorus, when heated to 1000°C, formed a vapor having a total
pressure of 0.20 atm and a density of 0.152 g L–1. Use this information to evaluate the
equilibrium constant Kp for this reaction.
Solution: Before worrying about what the density of the gas mixture has to do with
Kp , start out in the usual way by laying out the information required to express Kp in
terms of an unknown x.
P4 2 P2
Since K is independent of the number of
initial moles: 1 1-x
moles, assume the simplest case.
moles at
1-x 2x x is the fraction of P4 that dissociates.
equilibrium:
The denominator is the total number of
eq. mole
moles:
fractions:
(1-x) + 2x = 1+x.
eq. partial Partial pressure is the mole fraction times
pressures: the total pressure.
Expressing the equilibrium constant in terms of x gives

(By Shweta)
Now we need to find the dissociation fraction x of P4, and at this point we hope we
remember those gas laws that we were told we would be needing later in the course!
The density of a gas is directly proportional to its molecular weight, so we need to
calculate the densities of pure P4 and pure P2 vapors under the conditions of the
experiment. One of these densities will be greater than 0.152 gL–1 and the other will
be smaller; all we need to do is to find where the measured density falls in between
the two limits, and wef will have the dissociation fraction.
The molecular weight of phosphorus is 31.97, giving a molar mass of 127.9 g for P4.
This mass must be divided by the volume to find the density; assuming ideal gas
behavior, the volume of 127.9 g (1 mole) of P4 is given by RT/P, which works out to
522 L (remember to use the absolute temperature here.) The density of pure P4 vapor
under the conditions of the experiment is then
d = m/V = (128 g mol–1) (522 L mol–1) = 0.245 g L–1.
The density of pure P2 would be half this, or 0.122 g L–1. The difference between
these two limiting densities is 0.123 g L–1, and the difference between the density of
pure P4 and that of the equilibrium mixture is (.245 –.152) g L–1 or 0.093 g L–1. The
ratio 0.093 0.123 = 0.76 is therefore the fraction of P4 that remains and its fractional
dissociation is (1 – 0.76) = 0.24. Substituting into the equilibrium expression above
gives Kp = 1.2.
(By Shweta)
How can we predict equilibrium compositions?
This is by far the most common kind of equilibrium problem we will encounter:
starting with an arbitrary number of moles of each component, how many moles of
each will be present when the system comes to equilibrium? The principal source of
confusion and error for beginners at this relates to the need to determine the values of
several unknowns (a concentration or pressure for each component) from a single
equation, the equilibrium expression. The key to this is to make use of the
stoichiometric relationships between the various components, which usually allow us
to express the equilibrium composition in terms of a single variable. The easiest and
most error-free way of doing this is adopt a systematic approach in which we create
and fill in a small table as shown in the following problem example. We then
substitute the equilibrium values into the equilibrium constant expression, and solve it
for the unknown. This very often involves solving a quadratic or higher-order
equation. Quadratics can of course be solved by using the familiar quadratic formula,
but it is often easier to use an algebraic or graphical approximation, and for higher-
order equations this is the only practical approach. There is almost never any need to
get an exact answer, since the equilibrium constants we start with are rarely known all
that precisely.
Example
Phosgene (COCl2) is a poisonous gas that dissociates at high temperature into two
other poisonous gases, carbon monoxide and chlorine. The equilibrium constant Kp =
0.0041 at 600°K. Find the equilibrium composition of the system after 0.124 atm of
COCl2 is allowed to reach equilibrium at this temperature.
(By Shweta)
Solution: Start by drawing up a table showing the relationships between the

components:
COCl2 CO Cl2
initial pressures: 0.124 atm 0 0
change: –x +x +x
equilibrium pressures: 0.124 – x x x
Substitution of the equilibrium pressures into the equilibrium expression gives
This expression can be rearranged into standard polynomial form x2 +.0041 x –

0.00054 = 0 and solved by the quadratic formula, but we will simply obtain an
approximate solution by iteration. Because the equilibrium constant is small, we
know that x will be rather small compared to 0.124, so the above relation can be
approximated by
which gives x = 0.0225. To see how good this is, substitute this value of x into the
denominator of the original equation and solve again:
This time, solving for x gives 0.0204. Iterating once more, we get
(By Shweta)
and x = 0.0206 which is sufficiently close to the previous to be considered the final
result. The final partial pressures are then 0.104 atm for COCl2, and 0.0206 atm each
for CO and Cl2.
Note: using the quadratic formula to find the exact solution yields the two roots –
0.0247 (which we ignore) and 0.0206, which show that our approximation is quite
good.
Problem Example 4
The gas-phase dissociation of phosphorus pentachloride to the trichloride has Kp =

3.60 at 540°C:
PCl5 PCl3 + Cl2
What will be the partial pressures of all three components if 0.200 mole of PCl5 and
3.00 moles of PCl3 are combined and brought to equilibrium at this temperature and
at a total pressure of 1.00 atm?
Solution:
PCl5 PCl3 Cl2

initial moles: 0.200 3.00 0
change: –x +x +x
equilibrium
0.200 – x 3.00 + x x
moles:
eq. partial pressures:

(By Shweta)
The partial pressures in the bottom row were found by multiplying the mole fraction
of each gas by the total pressure: Pi = XiPt. The term in the denominator of each mole
fraction is the total number of moles of gas present at equilibrium: (0.200 – x) + (3.00
+ x) + x = 3.20 + x.
Substituting the equilibrium partial pressures into the equilibrium expression, we
have
whose polynomial form is 4.60 x2 + 13.80 x – 2.304 = 0.
Plotting this on a graphical calculator yields x = 0.159 as the positive root:
Substitution of this root into the expressions for the equilibrium partial pressures in
the table yields the following values: P(PCl5) = 0.012 atm, P(PCl3) = 0.94 atm, P(Cl2)
= 0.047 atm.
Effects of dilution on an equilibrium
In the section that introduced the LeChâtelier principle, it was mentioned that diluting
a weak acid such as acetic acid CH3COOH (“HAc”) will shift the dissociation
equilibrium to the right:
(By Shweta)
HAc + H2O H3O+ + Ac–
Thus a 0.10M solution of acetic acid is 1.3% ionized, while in a 0.01M solution, 4.3%
of the HAc molecules will be dissociated. This is because as the solution becomes
more dilute, the product [H3O+][Ac–] decreases more rapidly than does the [HAc]
term. At the same time the concentration of H2O becomes greater, but because it is so
large to start with (about 55.5M), any effect this might have is negligible, which is
why no [H2O] term appears in the equilibrium expression.
For a reaction such as CH3COOH(l) + C2H5OH(l) CH3COOC2H5(l) + H2O(l) (in

which the water concentration does change), dilution will have no effect on the
equilibrium; the situation is analogous to the way the pressure dependence of a gas-
phase reaction depends on the number of moles of gaseous components on either side
of the equation.
Example
The biochemical formation of a disaccharide (double) sugar from two

monosaccharides is exemplified by the reaction
fructose + glucose-6-phosphate sucrose-6-phosphate
(Sucrose is ordinary table sugar.) To what volume should a solution containing 0.050
mol of each monosaccharide be diluted in order to bring about 5% conversion to
sucrose phosphate?
Solution:
The initial and final numbers of moles are as follows:

(By Shweta)
fructose glucose-6-P sucrose-6-P

initial moles: 0.05 0.05 0
equilibrium moles: 0.0485 0.0485 0.0015
Substituting into the expression for Kc in which the solution volume is the unknown,
we have
Solving for V gives a final solution volume of 78 mL.
Phase distribution equilibria
It often happens that two immiscible liquid phases are in contact, one of which
contains a solute. How will the solute tend to distribute itself between the two phases?
One’s first thought might be that some of the solute will migrate from one phase into
the other until it is distributed equally between the two phases, since this would
correspond to the maximum dispersion (randomness) of the solute. This, however,
does not take into the account the differing solubilities the solute might have in the
two liquids; if such a difference does exist, the solute will preferentially migrate into
the phase in which it is more soluble. For a solute S distributed between two phases a
and b the process Sa = Sb is defined by the distribution law
in which Ka,b is the distribution ratio (also called the distribution coefficient) and [S]i
is the solubility of the solute in the phase.
(By Shweta)
The transport of substances between different phases is of immense importance in

such diverse fields as pharmacology and environmental science. For example, if a
drug is to pass from the aqueous phase with the stomach into the bloodstream, it must
pass through the lipid (oil-like) phase of the epithelial cells that line the digestive
tract. Similarly, a pollutant such as a pesticide residue that is more soluble in oil than
in water will be preferentially taken up and retained by marine organism, especially
fish, whose bodies contain more oil-like substances; this is basically the mechanism
whereby such residues as DDT can undergo biomagnification as they become more
concentrated at higher levels within the food chain. For this reason, environmental
regulations now require that oil-water distribution ratios be established for any new
chemical likely to find its way into natural waters. The standard “oil” phase that is
almost universally used is octanol, C8H17OH.
In preparative chemistry it is frequently necessary to recover a desired product

present in a reaction mixture by extracting it into another liquid in which it is more
soluble than the unwanted substances. On the laboratory scale this operation is carried
out in a separatory funnel in which the two phases are brought into intimate contact
by shaking. After the two liquids have separated into layers, the bottom layer is drawn
off. If the distribution ratio is too low to achieve efficient separation in a single step, it
can be repeated; there are automated devices that can carry out hundreds of
successive extractions, each yielding a product of higher purity. In these applications
our goal is to exploit the LeChâtelier principle by repeatedly upsetting the phase
distribution equilibrium that would result if two phases were to remain in permanent
contact.
This separatory funnel is used to extract a substance from one liquid into another in
which it is more soluble. The two immiscible liquids are poured into the funnel
through the opening at the top. The funnel is then shaken to bring the two phases into
intimate contact, and then set aside to allow the two liquids to separate into layers,
(By Shweta)
which are then separated by allowing the more dense liquid to exit through the
stopcock at the bottom
Example
The distribution ratio for iodine between water and carbon disulfide is 650. Calculate
the concentration of I2 remaining in the aqueous phase after 50.0 mL of 0.10M I2 in
water is shaken with 10.0 mL of CS2.
Solution:
The equilibrium constant is
Let m1 and m2 represent the numbers of millimoles of solute in the water and CS2
layers, respectively. Kd can then be written as (m2/10 mL) ÷ (m1/50 mL) = 650. The
number of moles of solute is (50 mL) × (0.10 mmol mL–1) = 5.00 mmol, and mass
conservation requires that m1 + m2 = 5.00 mmol, so m2 = (5.00 – m1) mmol and we
now have only the single unknown m1. The equilibrium constant then becomes
((5.00 – m1) mmol / 10 mL) ÷ (m1 mmol / 50 mL) = 650.
Simplifying and solving for m1 yields (0.50 – 0.1)m1 / (0.02 m1) = 650, with m1 =
0.0382 mmol. The concentration of solute in the water layer is (0.0382 mmol) /
(50 mL) = 0.000763 M, showing that almost all of the iodine has moved into the CS2
layer.
(By Shweta)
Summary
The six Problem Examples presented above were carefully selected to span the range
of problem types that students enrolled in first-year college chemistry courses are
expected to be able to deal with. If we are able to reproduce these solutions on our
own, we should be well prepared for an examination on this topic.
• The first step in the solution of all but the simplest equilibrium problems is to
sketch out a table showing for each component the initial concentration or
pressure, the change in this quantity (for example, +2x), and the equilibrium
values (for example, .0036 + 2x). In doing so, the sequence of calculations
required to get to the answer usually becomes apparent.
• Equilibrium calculations often involve quadratic- or higher-order equations.
Because concentrations, pressures, and equilibrium constants are seldom
known to a precision of more than a few significant figures, there is no need to
seek exact solutions. Iterative approximations or use of a graphical calculator
are adequate and convenient.
• Phase distribution equilibria play an important role in chemical separation
processes on both laboratory and industrial scales. They are also involved in
the movement of chemicals between different parts of the environment, and in
the bioconcentration of pollutants in the food chain.
Here the thesis ends with a Thanks to You

Chemical Equilibrium

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Chemical Equilibrium

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Chemical Equilibrium

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

A Study of Chemical Equilibrium

Devoted to the Global Open University, Nagaland

Master of Philosophy (M. Phil) in Chemistry

Academic Year – 2008-2009

Enrollment No. : M.phil / 4148 / CHE / 2008J

Under the Guidance of : Dr. Ashok Kumar Yadav

6. Chemical Changes: How Far, How Fast?

8. What is Chemical Equilibrium?

9. What is a reversible reaction?

10. What is the Law of Mass Action?

11. How do we know when a reaction is at equilibrium?

12. What is the le Châtelier Principle and why is it important?

13. How do changes in temperature affect equilibria?

14. How do changes in pressure affect equilibria?

15. What is the Haber process and why is it important?

16. What is the equilibrium quotient?

17. Does everything stop when equilibrium is reached?

18. Using concentration and pressure terms in equilibrium

19. Do equilibrium constants have units?

20. Heterogeneous reactions: the vapor pressure of solid

21. How can we find the equilibrium constant for a series of

22. Measuring and calculating equilibrium constants

23. How can we predict equilibrium compositions?

Enrollment No. : Mphil / 4148 / CHE / 2008J

Under the Guidance of : Dr. Ashok Kumar Yadav

It is certified that the thesis titled “A Study of Chemical Equilibrium” is a bonafide

Dr. Ashok Kumar Yadav

About the Thesis

Chemical change: how far, how fast?

A given chemical reaction system is defined by a balanced net chemical equation

This refers to the thermodynamics (energetics) of the reaction, which

• What is the mechanism of the reaction?

What happens, at the atomic or molecular level, when reactants are

A reaction that is thermodynamically possible but for which no reasonably rapid

Next page will describe about equilibrium.

Another kind of equilibrium we all experience is thermal equilibrium. When two

Next page will describe as to what is “chemical equilibrium.”

What is Chemical Equilibrium?

“A chemical reaction is in equilibrium when there is no tendency for the quantities of

H2 + I2 → 2 HI "synthesis of hydrogen iodide"

2 HI → H2 + I2 "dissociation of hydrogen iodide"

This last point is central to the concept of chemical equilibrium. It makes no

It's the same both ways

The equilibrium state is independent of the direction from which it is approached.

What is a reversible reaction?

If it is desired to emphasize the reversibility of a reaction, the single arrow in the

A reaction is said to be complete when the equilibrium composition contains no

How did Napoleon Bonaparte help discover reversible

Na2CO3 + CaCl2 → CaCO3 + 2 NaCl

which was known to proceed to completion in the laboratory. He immediately

What is the Law of Mass Action?

Berthollet's ideas about reversible reactions were finally vindicated by experiments

Rate of Forward Reaction = Rate of Reverse Reaction

How do we know when a reaction is at equilibrium?

In principle. However, there are two important qualifications:

generally be predicted, and must be worked out experimentally. Also, the

• As a chemical change proceeds, the quantities of the components on one side

The equilibrium composition is independent of the direction from which it is

From the above, it follows that equilibrium is a dynamic process in which