Roots of Transactional Analysis
Roots of Transactional Analysis
Roots of Transactional Analysis
In the early 20th century, Sigmund Freud first established that the human psyche is multi-faceted,
and that each of us has warring factions in our subconscious. Since then, new theories continue
to be put forward, all concentrating on the essential conviction that each one of us has parts of
our personality which surface and affect our behaviour according to different circumstances.
In 1951 Dr Wilder Penfield began a series of scientific experiments. Penfield proved, using
conscious human subjects, by touching a part of the brain (the temporal cortex) with a weak
electrical probe, that the brain could be caused to 'play back' certain past experiences, and the
feelings associated with them. The patients 'replayed' these events and their feelings despite not
normally being able to recall them using their conventional memories.
Penfield's experiments went on over several years, and resulted in wide acceptance of the
following conclusions:
The human brain acts like a tape recorder, and whilst we may 'forget' experiences, the
brain still has them recorded.
Along with events the brain also records the associated feelings, and both feelings and
events stay locked together.
It is possible for a person to exist in two states simultaneously (because patients replaying
hidden events and feelings could talk about them objectively at the same time).
Hidden experiences when replayed are vivid, and affect how we feel at the time of
replaying.
There is a certain connection between mind and body, i.e. the link between the biological
and the psychological, eg a psychological fear of spiders and a biological feeling of
nausea.
early transactional analysis theory and model
In the 1950's Eric Berne began to develop his theories of Transactional Analysis. He said that
verbal communication, particularly face to face, is at the centre of human social relationships and
psychoanalysis.
His starting-point was that when two people encounter each other, one of them will speak to the
other. This he called the Transaction Stimulus. The reaction from the other person he called the
Transaction Response.
The person sending the Stimulus is called the Agent. The person who responds is called the
Respondent.
Transactional Analysis became the method of examining the transaction wherein: 'I do
something to you, and you do something back'.
Berne also said that each person is made up of three alter ego states:
Parent
Adult
Child
These terms have different definitions than in normal language.
Parent
This is our ingrained voice of authority, absorbed conditioning, learning and attitudes from when
we were young. We were conditioned by our real parents, teachers, older people, next door
neighbours, aunts and uncles, Father Christmas and Jack Frost. Our Parent is made up of a huge
number of hidden and overt recorded playbacks. Typically embodied by phrases and attitudes
starting with 'how to', 'under no circumstances', 'always' and 'never forget', 'don't lie, cheat, steal',
etc, etc. Our parent is formed by external events and influences upon us as we grow through
early childhood. We can change it, but this is easier said than done.
Child
Our internal reaction and feelings to external events form the 'Child'. This is the seeing, hearing,
feeling, and emotional body of data within each of us. When anger or despair dominates reason,
the Child is in control. Like our Parent we can change it, but it is no easier.
Adult
Our 'Adult' is our ability to think and determine action for ourselves, based on received data. The
adult in us begins to form at around ten months old, and is the means by which we keep our
Parent and Child under control. If we are to change our Parent or Child we must do so through
our adult.
In other words:
When we communicate we are doing so from one of our own alter ego states, our Parent, Adult
or Child. Our feelings at the time determine which one we use, and at any time something can
trigger a shift from one state to another. When we respond, we are also doing this from one of
the three states, and it is in the analysis of these stimuli and responses that the essence of
Transactional Analysis lies. See the poem by Philip Larkin about how parental conditioning
affects children and their behaviour into adulthood. And for an uplifting antidote see the lovely
Thich Nhat Hanh quote. These are all excellent illustrations of the effect and implications of
parental conditioning in the context of Transactional Analysis.
At the core of Berne's theory is the rule that effective transactions (ie successful
communications) must be complementary. They must go back from the receiving ego state to the
sending ego state. For example, if the stimulus is Parent to Child, the response must be Child to
Parent, or the transaction is 'crossed', and there will be a problem between sender and receiver.
If a crossed transaction occurs, there is an ineffective communication. Worse still either or both
parties will be upset. In order for the relationship to continue smoothly the agent or the
respondent must rescue the situation with a complementary transaction.
Here are some simple clues as to the ego state sending the signal. You will be able to see these
clearly in others, and in yourself:
Parent
Physical - angry or impatient body-language and expressions, finger-pointing, patronising
gestures,
Verbal - always, never, for once and for all, judgmental words, critical words, patronising
language, posturing language.
Verbal - baby talk, I wish, I dunno, I want, I'm gonna, I don't care, oh no, not again, things never
go right for me, worst day of my life, bigger, biggest, best, many superlatives, words to impress.
Adult
Physical - attentive, interested, straight-forward, tilted head, non-threatening and non-threatened.
Verbal - why, what, how, who, where and when, how much, in what way, comparative
expressions, reasoned statements, true, false, probably, possibly, I think, I realise, I see, I believe,
in my opinion.
And remember, when you are trying to identify ego states: words are only part of the story.
To analyse a transaction you need to see and feel what is being said as well.
There is no general rule as to the effectiveness of any ego state in any given situation (some
people get results by being dictatorial (Parent to Child), or by having temper tantrums, (Child to
Parent), but for a balanced approach to life, Adult to Adult is generally recommended.
Transactional Analysis developed significantly beyond these Berne's early theories, by Berne
himself until his death in 1970, and since then by his followers and many current writers and
experts. Transactional Analysis has been explored and enhanced in many different ways by these
people, including: Ian Stewart and Vann Joines (their book 'TA Today' is widely regarded as a
definitive modern interpretation); John Dusay, Aaron and Jacqui Schiff, Robert and Mary
Goulding, Pat Crossman, Taibi Kahler, Abe Wagner, Ken Mellor and Eric Sigmund, Richard
Erskine and Marityn Zalcman, Muriel James, Pam Levin, Anita Mountain and Julie Hay
(specialists in organizational applications), Susannah Temple, Claude Steiner, Franklin Ernst, S
Woollams and M Brown, Fanita English, P Clarkson, M M Holloway, Stephen Karpman and
others.
Significantly, the original three Parent Adult Child components were sub-divided to form a new
seven element model, principally during the 1980's by Wagner, Joines and Mountain. This
established Controlling and Nurturing aspects of the Parent mode, each with positive and
negative aspects, and the Adapted and Free aspects of the Child mode, again each with positive
an negative aspects, which essentially gives us the model to which most TA practitioners refer
today:
parent
Parent is now commonly represented as a circle with four quadrants:
adult
Adult remains as a single entity, representing an 'accounting' function or mode, which can draw
on the resources of both Parent and Child.
child
Child is now commonly represented as circle with four quadrants: