My Mathematics SBA

My Mathematics
SBA
Table of Content
1. Project title……………………………………………5
2. Introduction…………………………………………......6
3. Method of Investigation………………………………7
4. Presentation of data…………………………………......8
5. Analysis of data……………………………………….9
6. Discussion of finding……………………………………10
7. Conclusion……………………………………………11
Acknowledgement
I would like to thank my class mates for helping me to complete this

school based assignment. I would also like to thank my teacher Mr.
Campbell for guiding me so that I could complete this SBA.
Introduction
In this SBA are real averages of student’s performance in mathematics.
To determine if the science group at school Perform better in
mathematics than the General and business Group, were the researcher
had to grant permission to get the 4th Form students' performance overall
in mathematics. The researcher Want to find out if the statement is true
and what can be put in place to improve students’ performance in
mathematics.
Topic for SBA
To determine if the 4th form science group at our school perform better
in math than the other groups.
Method of Investigation
To conduct this research, the researcher use raffle to randomly select a
total of 60 Students. The researcher arrange their names in alphabetical
Order with their classes and averages. To determine if the science group
Perform better than the general and business group. Twenty students
each were selected from the general, business as well as the science
Group.
General Group
First Name Last Name Class Average
Akeem Bailey 4A1 41.5
Deshaun Barnett 4A1 26.3
Oneil Blackman 4A2 10.7
Amanda Brown 4A3 78
Shakeem Dacosta 4A3 55
Ryheem Embden 4A2 63.7
Joel Facey 4A2 5.7
Malieke Facey 4A1 35.7
Romario Gilzean 4A2 49.4
Lemarie Grant 4A1 17.2
Sakeem Green 4A1 58.2
Asheca Hall 4A1 82.9
Mace Hardware 4A2 55.6
Shantay Hyatt 4A2 61.5
Joseph Martin 4A2 39.1
Adrian Mcfarlane 4A3 72.5
Jermaine Mills 4A2 25.3
Odane Richards 4A3 39.6
Devoney Rose 4A2 55
Zehiem Smith 4A2 28.6
Science Group
Zavon Armstrong 4A5 86
Garneth Bailey 4A5 69.9
Jasette Brown 4A5 58.9
Sashena Brown 4A5 66.2
Abigale Campbell 4A5 61.2
Sordia Daley 4A5 72.1
Abigale Edwards 4A5 91.1
Chenelle Ergus 4A5 82.6
Dwayne Fraser 4A5 75
Gregory Goulborne 4A5 19.8
Tashena Green 4A5 77.9
Kimone Harrison 4A5 84.6
Devantaye Harris 4A5 86.4
Shyan Mitchell 4A5 62.4
Yanique Morgan 4A5 43.1
Deneisha Nembard 4A5 25.4
Jaheim Rowet 4A5 69.5
Zachary Tracey 4A5 46.5
Anniecia Walcom 4A5 34.7
Lashem Wongsam 4A5 88
Business Group

Ronda Bartley 4A4 52
Chris-Ann Beech 4A4 39.7
Aliyah Forbes 4A4 41.8
Rajae Fullwood 4A4 35.4
Roshanae Gooden 4A4 52.5
Natteika Grant 4A4 9.5
Sadeon Gray 4A4 87.6
Alicia Griffiths 4A4 57.8
Ashanti Griffiths 4A4 93.8
Shannon Jackson 4A4 17.1
Brittney Mccleary 4A4 38.8
Micheal Miller 4A4 59.4
Ashley Minzie 4A4 52.3
Jordon Newman 4A4 27.6
Marissa Provost 4A4 78.5
Makada Stewart 4A4 48.3
Kimoya Taylor 4A4 32.6
Ajanay Walker 4A4 62.2
Tikola Weathely 4A4 49.5
Abigail Wright 4A4 72.5
Presentation of data
Table 1
Class Marks
Science 86 69.9 58.9 66.2 61.2 72.1 91.1 82.6 75 19.8
77.9 84.6 86.4 62.4 43.1 25.4 69.5 46.5 34.7 88
Business 52 39.7 41.8 35.4 52.5 9.5 87.6 57.8 93.8 17.1
38.8 59.4 52.3 27.6 78.5 48.3 32.6 62.2 49.5 72.5
General 41.5 26.3 10.7 78 55 63.7 5.7 35.7 49.4 17.2
58.2 82.9 55.6 61.5 39.1 72.5 25.3 39.6 55 28.6
Table 2
Class Number of Number of % 0 -59 % 60 - 100

students students
passed failed
Science 14 6 30% 70%
General 5 15 75% 25%
Business 5 15 75% 25%
Calculations of Mean (x)
Mean x =Sum of all scores in the sample

___________________________________________________
Number of scores in the sample
Mean for science group = 1,301.3

___________ = 65.06%
20
Mean for General group = 901.5
___________ = 45.07%
20
Mean for Business = 1,008.9
___________ =50.44%
20
Bar Graph showing averages of the 3 grades

70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Science Group General Group Business
Analysis of data
A total of sixty students were selected overall and twenty each were selected from
the General, Business and science group. In the General group fifteen students
failed with a 75% percentage and only five student pass with a 25% percentage. In
Business group they also have the amount of students that pass and fail has in the
general group with 15 student failing with a 75% percentage and Five (5) passing
with a 25% percentage. In the science group a total of 14 passed with a 70%
percentage and 6 students failed with a 30% percentage.
Discussion of Finding
The researcher aim for this investigation was to determine if the science group
perform better than the general and business group. The research has been confirm
and it is true that the science group perform better than the business and general
group because only six students out of twenty fail the subject and fifteen out of
twenty failed in the business and general group.
Conclusion
Is to determine if the 4th form science group at our school perform better in
mathematics than the other groups.

My Mathematics SBA

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

My Mathematics SBA

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

My Mathematics SBA

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

My Mathematics

I would like to thank my class mates for helping me to complete this

First Name Last Name Class Average

Class Number of Number of % 0 -59 % 60 - 100

Calculations of Mean (x)

Mean x =Sum of all scores in the sample

Number of scores in the sample

Mean for science group = 1,301.3

Mean for General group = 901.5

Mean for Business = 1,008.9

Bar Graph showing averages of the 3 grades

You might also like