Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Review: Plant Functional Traits With Particular Reference To Tropical Deciduous Forests: A Review

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 22

Review

Plant functional traits with particular reference to tropical


deciduous forests: A review

* AS RAGHUBANSHI and
RK CHATURVEDI 1, 2 JS SINGH 1
1 2
Ecosystems Analysis Laboratory, Department of Botany( and Institute of Environment and
Sustainable Development, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, India

*Corresponding author (Fax, 0542 2368174; Email, ravikantchaturvedi10@gmail.com)

Functional traits (FTs) integrate the ecological and evolutionary history of a species, and can potentially be used to
predict its response as well as its influence on ecosystem functioning. Study of inter-specific variation in the FTs of
plants aids in classifying species into plant functional types (PFTs) and provides insights into fundamental patterns
and trade-offs in plant form and functioning and the effect of changing species composition on ecosystem functions.
Specifically, this paper focuses on those FTs that make a species successful in the dry tropical environment.
Following a brief overview, we discuss plant FTs that may be particularly relevant to tropical deciduous forests
(TDFs). We consider the traits under the following categories: leaf traits, stem and root traits, reproductive traits,
and traits particularly relevant to water availability. We compile quantitative information on functional traits of dry
tropical forest species. We also discuss trait-based grouping of plants into PFTs. We recognize that there is
incomplete knowledge about many FTs and their effects on TDFs and point out the need for further research on
PFTs of TDF species, which can enable prediction of the dynamics of these forests in the face of disturbance and
global climate change. Correlations between structural and ecophysiological traits and ecosystem functioning should
also be established which could make it possible to generate predictions of changes in ecosystem services from
changes in functional composition.

[Chaturvedi RK, Raghubanshi AS and Singh JS 2011 Plant functional traits with particular reference to tropical deciduous forests: A review.
J. Biosci. 36 963–981] DOI 10.1007/s12038-011-9159-1

1. Introduction Cabido 2001). In recent years, the possible effects of


terrestrial plant diversity on ecosystem processes and
Plant functional traits (FTs) can be defined as ‘plant services are increasingly being documented (see Díaz et al.
characteristics that respond to the dominant ecosystem 2003; Mooney et al. 2009; Mooney 2010), and ecologists
processes’ (Gitay and Noble 1997). Examples of FTs are are trying to develop functional classifications of species to
leaf size, toughness and longevity, seed size and dispersal comprehend the complex diversity of life on earth
mode, canopy height and structure, ability to resprout (McIntyre et al. 1999; Weiher et al. 1999). Garnier et al.
and capacity for symbiotic fixation of nitrogen (Díaz and (2007) presented a standardized methodology that used FTs
to assess

Keywords. Ecosystem functioning; environmental change; functional traits; leaf traits; moisture stress; tropical deciduous forest

Abbreviations: Aarea, area-based leaf maximum photosynthetic rate; A mass, mass-based leaf maximum photosynthetic rate; ANPP, above
ground net primary production; ATP, adenosine triphosphate; Ca mass, mass-based calcium concentration; CC, leaf construction cost; Chl,
chlorophyll concentration; Cmass, mass-based carbon concentration; DBH, diameter at breast height; E, leaf transpiration rate; FT,
functional trait; gc, leaf stomatal conductance, K mass, mass-based potassium concentration; LA, leaf area; LAI, leaf area index; LDMC,
leaf dry matter content; LL, leaf life-span; LMA, leaf mass per area; LNC, leaf nitrogen concentration; LPC, leaf phosphorus
concentration; LSCmax, maximum leaf specific hydraulic conductivity; LWC, leaf water content; Na mass, mass-based sodium
concentration; Nmass, mass-based nitrogen concentration; PFT, plant functional type; P mass, mass-based phosphorus concentration; Rd area,
area-based dark respiration rate; Rd mass, mass-based dark respiration rate; Rd max, maximum rate of dark respiration; SLA, specific leaf
area; SSD, specific stem density; TDF, tropical deciduous forest; TDMC, twig dry matter content; WUEi, intrinsic water use efficiency

http://www.ias.ac.in/jbiosci J. Biosci. 36(5), December 2011, 963–981, * Indian Academy of Sciences


963
964 RK Chaturvedi, AS Raghubanshi and JS Singh
forests occurring in tropical regions which are characterized
the impacts of land-use changes on vegetation and
by pronounced seasonality in rainfall distribution with
ecosystem functioning. They studied 16 traits describing
several
plant stature, leaf characteristics and reproduction for the
most dominant species at 11 sites representing various types
of land-use changes occurring in marginal agro-ecosystems
across Europe and Israel. According to their results, the
functional traits were able to describe adequately the
functional response of vegetation to land-use changes.
Thus, a consideration of FTs makes it possible to seek
general explanations for differences in functioning of
climatically and edaphically diverse environments
(Pakeman 2004).
Understanding the mechanisms through which species
traits determine community structure is also a priority area
of research (Lavorel et al. 2007). A recent trait based
approach to community assembly helped to integrate
functional ecology and gradient analysis with community
ecology and coexistence theory (Ackerly and Cornwell
2007). Kraft et al. (2008) examined the co-occurrence
patterns of over 1100 tree species in a 25-hectare
Amazonian forest plot in relation to field measured
functional traits and showed that inter-specific differences
in trait-based ecological strategies contribute to the
maintenance of diversity in one of the most diverse tropical
forests in the world.
The complexity and diversity of natural systems makes
grouping of species essential for deriving general principles
of succession and ecosystem recovery following human
impact (Keddy 1992; Grime et al. 1997; Westoby 1998;
Aubin et al. 2009). Traditionally, species have been
grouped into plant functional types (PFTs) on the basis of
their physiological/ecological functions and common
evolutionary history (Noble and Gitay 1996). However,
there has also been a search for the functional description of
vegetation based on FTs that show a common response to
the environment, independent of phylogeny (Rusch et al.
2003). Mouchet et al. (2010) have inferred that in
combination with phylogenetic and taxonomic diversity,
functional diversity will ‘improve our understanding of how
biodiversity interacts with ecosystem processes and
environmental constraints’. In many poorly described plant
communities where taxo- nomic knowledge is limited, an
FT approach can be used to understand and predict
plant responses to changing management factors and
environment (Díaz et al. 2001). Plant functional groupings
are also potentially useful communication tools for land
managers, who may not necessarily relate to taxonomic
units, particularly when dealing with species-rich
ecosystems (Díaz et al. 2002).
According to Holdridge (1967), tropical forests comprise
about 52% of the global forest cover, and tropical dry
forests comprise 42% of tropical forests. In India, tropical
dry forests account for 38.2% of the total forest cover
(MoEF 1999). Tropical deciduous forests (TDFs) are

J. Biosci. 36(5), December 2011


Plant functional traits in tropical deciduous forests 965
Functional traits are directly or indirectly linked to plant
months of drought (Mooney et al. 1995). TDFs are population and ecosystem processes (Hillebrand and
typically dominated by deciduous trees where at least
50% of trees present are drought deciduous, the mean Matthiessen 2009). The provides insights into the
annual temperature is >25°C, total annual precipitation correlations between patterns and trade- offs in
ranges between 700 and 2000 mm, and there are 3 or structural and plant form and functioning
more dry months (with precipitation < 100 mm) every ecophysiological traits and (e.g. Poorter and Bergkotte
year (Sánchez-Azofeifa et al. 2005). Pennington et al. ecosystem functioning, 1992; Reich et al. 1992; Von
(2006) use a wider interpretation of TDF which includes including primary Willert et al. 1992; Grime et
vegetation that experiences a minimum dry season period productivity, decomposition al. 1997; Lambers et al.
of 5–6 months, resulting in strongly seasonal ecological and nutrient cycling, and 1998; Craine et al. 2001) and
processes and functions. water availability could reveals the effects of
TDFs have historically supported high human (changing) species
make it possible to predict
population densities because their climatic and edaphic composition on ecosystem
changes in ecosystem
characteristics are attractive for human settlement and functions (e.g. Schulze and
services from changes in
development (Tosi and Voertman 1964; Sánchez-Azofeifa Mooney 1994;
functional composition. MacGillivray et al. 1995;
et al. 2005). Dry forests are more threatened and less Changing species
protected than moist and wet forests (Gerhardt 1993; Wardle et al. 1998; Díaz et
composition can change FT al. 1999).
Powers and Tiffin 2010) and have decreased in area
composition, which in turn Geber and Griffen (2003)
considerably during the past decades. In central India they
affects the ecosystem defined a functional trait as
are threatened by lopping, burning, overgrazing and
functioning that depends any phenotypic character that
clearing for cultivation (Jha and Singh 1990), and as a
result, the forest cover in most regions is being converted, both on the traits of influences an organism’s
over the past several decades, into dry deciduous scrub, species that decline or fitness and reported that the
savanna and grasslands that are progres- sively species- disappear and the traits of influence of FTs on final
poor (Champion and Seth 1968; Sagar and Singh 2003). species that replace them fitness can be complex
These forests are vulnerable to stress during successional (Díaz et al. 2003; Suding et because of the
processes as they experience a severe and less predictable al. 2006; Lavorel et al. interrelationships among
environment (Murphy and Lugo 1986). 2007). FTs. They also argued that
Plant species in TDFs are subjected to water stress There is much variation FTs affect fitness through
during the dry season (Eamus 1999), and the length of dry in plant traits among species performance measures such
season is the controlling factor of vegetation structure and (Wardle et al. 1998; as growth rate, competitive
patterns (Gritti et al. 2010). Due to locational differences Kooyman and Westoby ability, herbivore resistance
in the extent and intensity of seasonal drought, TDFs are 2009) and across groups of to tolerance, attractiveness to
com- posed of a mosaic of different PFTs showing species (Garnier 1991).The pollinators, etc. The
varying adaptations to seasonal drought (Borchert 2000). relative importance of FTs performance measures, in
In the present article, following a brief background, we in determining ecosystem turn, affect fitness
review the literature on plant FTs which are particularly processes changes across components such as age-
relevant to TDFs in order to understand the relationship plant groups (Cornelissen specific rates of survival,
between FTs and functioning of plants in tropical and Thompson 1997; growth, fertility, or mating
deciduous forest ecosystems. We consider the traits under McLaren and Turkington success, and, eventually,
following categories: leaf traits, stem and root traits, 2010). Further, plant effects lifetime fitness. Violle et al.
reproductive traits and traits particularly relevant to water on any ecosystem process (2007) consider functional
availability and discuss their relevance to functioning of can be mediated by multiple traits as morpho-physio-
tropical deciduous forest ecosystems. We also discuss traits, and many of these phenological traits that affect
trait-based grouping of plants into PFTs. Finally, this traits vary independently fitness indirectly through
article compiles information on FTs of TDF species, and from one another (Eviner their effects on growth,
recognizes that there is incomplete knowledge about and Chapin 2003). Specific reproduction and survival.
many FTs and suggests the need for further research on processes could be affected Currently, the
FTs and their effects on TDFs. We suggest that a major by a combination of traits, construction of a large
focus of research should be to evaluate those FTs that while particular key traits database of FTs is gaining
make a species successful in relation to moisture gradient. could simultaneously high priority in the research
control multiple processes agenda of plant ecology
2. Plant functional traits and ecosystem processes (de Bello et al. 2010). A (e.g. Westoby and Wright
consideration of inter- 2006; TraitNet:
specific variation in FTs http://traitnet.ecoinformatics
J. Biosci. 36(5), December 2011
966 RK Chaturvedi, AS Raghubanshi and JS Singh
.org/) because it appears as et al. (2006), the efficiency A high priority goal to
3. Tropical help reduce the measuring
a fundamental step both to of whole-plant nitrogen
deciduous forest effort is
understand and to predict use, uptake and response
functional traits the identification of
the distribution of species increase monotonically
in the present and future relationships between tree
with decreasing soil physiology and tree (or
environments (Grime et al. As mentioned above,
tropical deciduous forests nitrogen and water, and it leaf) morphological and
1988; Keddy 1992; is higher on infertile (dry)
are characterized by phenological traits.
Westoby 1998), and to habitats than on fertile
warm temperatures and a Examples are leaf lifespan
relate the functioning of (wet) habitats.
dry period of 3 or more – photosynthesis or leaf
species to that of
months. Deciduousness is There are a number of conductance relations,
ecosystems (Grime 1997;
a phenological attribute FTs that can influence specific leaf area –
Chapin et al. 2000).
expressing adaptation to ecosystem processes in photosynthesis
seasonality and drought, TDFs. Starting with relationships (e.g. Reich et
resulting in reduced vegetative traits, various al. 1998), and tree height –
activities during the growth forms represent photosynthesis relations
unfavourable season and adaptations in response to (Zhang et al. 2009; Brienen
resumption of growth with et al. 2010). Data are now
grazing by different
variable rates of resource available on tropical
herbivores. Life forms
use during the short deciduous trees with
favourable season (Singh with perennating tissues respect to selected
and Singh 1992). The help in the survival of physiological attributes or
deciduousness of TDF plant species from functional relationships
species is affected by unpredictable such as (i) nitrogen and
rainfall, temperature and disturbances. Plant height water use efficiency
solar radiation and affects is associated with (Sobrado 1991), (ii)
intra- and inter-annual competitive vigour and photosynthetic
pattern of water, carbon whole plant fecundity characteristics and
and energy balance in (Cornelissen et al. 2003). associated traits (Kitajima
TDFs (Bohlman 2010). Clonality, spinescence and et al. 1997; Niinemets and
FTs that enable flammability are also Tenhunen 1997; Niinemets
acquisition of limiting important vegetative traits 1999; Niinemets et al.
nutrients and water are 2009; Posada et al. 2009),
of plant species in TDFs
important for TDF species. (iii) water and trait relations
(Saha and Howe 2003;
Plant water uptake (Olivares and Medina 1992;
Raherison and Grouzis Medina and Francisco
patterns from different 2005). 1994; Franco et al.
soil depths, which often
vary spatially and 2005; Wright et al. 2007; damage (Janzen 1970; Coley
temporally between Gotsch et al. 2010), (iv) and Barone 1996; Coley
different plant functional light- dependent leaf trait 1998; Arnold and Asquith
groups or types, can variations (Rozendaal et al. 2002; Campo and Dirzo
directly influence soil 2006; Markesteijn et al. 2003; Brenes-Arguedas et al.
water dynamics during the 2007), (v) nitrogen fixation 2009) and (viii) leaf flushing
growing season (Ryel et and nitrate/ ammonium and flowering phenology
assimilation capacities (Opler et al. 1980; Seghieri
al. 2008; Schwinning
(Schulze et al. 1991; et al. 2009; Hayden et al.
2010). Apart from water,
Högberg 1992; Högberg and 2010; Fallas-Cedeño et al.
nutrient supply also limits
Alexander 1995; Freitas et 2010). However, despite
growth rates in TDFs al. 2010), (vi) drought rapid progress in the field of
(Hedin et al. 2009) and effects on leaf conductance, dry tropical tree
may determine spatial leaf water status and ecophysiology, most studies
variation in growth of photosynthesis (Eamus (a) do not consider more than
individual species in these 1999; Brodribb et al. 2003; two or three FTs (which
forests (Swaine et al. Brodribb and Holbrook makes a multivariate analysis
1987). According to Yuan 2003a,b), (vii) herbivore of tree character sets

J. Biosci. 36(5), December 2011


Plant functional traits in tropical deciduous forests 967
difficult), (b) refer to tree Three such traits are SLA
saplings instead of adults (specific leaf area, i.e. the the whole plant level species (e.g. CC; Villar and
(which do not reveal the ratio of leaf area to dry (Grime et al. 1997; Poorter Merino 2001), values of
complete picture, because mass), LDMC (leaf dry and Garnier 1999; Lavorel other traits differ between
there are changes in many matter content. i.e. the ratio et al. 2007). the species of these two
biological processes as of leaf dry mass to saturated Data available on leaf habits. In the TDF,
organisms grow and age, fresh mass) and LNC (leaf various leaf traits of tree broad-leaved deciduous
leading to increased nitrogen concentration) species in TDFs are trees are reported to have
structural complexity) and (Cunningham et al. 1999; limited, and summarized greater SLA, LNC and
(c) are related to the Reich et al. 1999; Wilson et in table 1. There are photosynthetic rates as
neotropics, therefore al. 1999; Markesteijn et al. marked inter-specific and compared to broad- leaved
limiting generalizations 2007). Two of these traits inter-regional variations in evergreen trees (see
about the pattern of (SLA and LNC) have the values of most of the references in Powers and
functional trait already been compiled into a traits. Inter-specific Tiffin 2010). The mean
relationships worldwide database (Wright et al. variation in a majority of values of leaf life-span
(Díaz et al. 2004; Wright et 2004). SLA and LNC of cases was larger than the (LL) for desert (14 mo),
al. 2007). In the following component species may have inter-regional variation tropical evergreen (20 mo),
subsections, we review our a significant impact on (table 1). For example, temperate evergreen (44
understanding of functional primary productivity and while mean SLA of TDF mo), temperate deciduous
traits in TDFs. nutrient cycling at the species among six (13 mo) and tundra (7 mo)
ecosystem level (Reich et al. countries varied between species (Reich et al. 1998)
3.1 L 1992; Cornelissen et al. 8.5 mm2 mg−1 (Panama) to are greater than the value (6
e 1999; Aerts and Chapin 20.7 mm2 mg−1 (Bolivia), mo) observed by Prior et
a 2000). This is because a within a region (e.g. al. (2003) for deciduous
f combination of SLA and Argentina) the maximum species of Australia. Thus,
LNC, which are related to value of SLA was more mean LL is shorter and
t leaf lifespan, can predict than six times the LMA is lower in TDF
r accurately the maximum minimum value. The species compared to
a photosyn- thetic rate of a desert, tropical evergreen, evergreen woody species
i wide range of species (Reich temperate evergreen and (Wright et al. 2004a). In
t et al. 1997). A similar tundra species usually Argentina, the desert
s argument has been made for have lower SLA than the species showed greater
LDMC (Ryser and Urbas TDF species. For example, average leaf thickness (1.9
Leaf habit (i.e. 2000). The above traits are SLA ranged between 6.2 mm) and LWC (80%) as
deciduousness/evergreenne involved in a trade-off and compared to the average
ss) has been traditionally between rapid biomass 4.7 mm2mg−1 in desert leaf thickness (0.3 mm) and
considered as an important production and efficient species (Reich et al. LWC (60%) of deciduous
1998; species (Vendramini et al.
FT for grouping species nutrient conservation at
Vendramini et al. 2002), 2002). Among
into ecologically relevant
PFTs. However, Powers 5.9 and 9.7 mm2 mg−1 in ecophysiological traits, gc
and Tiffin (2010) analysed tropical evergreen of TDF species also varied
the potential of leaf habit as (Vendramini et al. 2002; substantially among the
a trait for defining Santiago 2003), 4.2 and regions and species (table
ecologically meaningful 4.8 mm2 mg−1 in 1). The reported values for
groups of tropical dry temperate evergreen gc from desert (329 mmol
forest species, and (Reich et al. 1995; Reich m−2 s−1; Horton et al.
concluded that leaf habit et al. 1998) and 3.3 and 2001), tropical evergreen
alone has little utility in 7.0 mm2 mg−1 in tundra (90 mmol m−2 s−1; Ishida
distinguishing PFTs in the species (Körner et al. et al. 2006) and temperate
Costa Rican TDFs. It has 1986; Reich et al. 1998) deciduous (190 mmol m−2
been rightly argued that a compared to the TDF s−1; Kubiske and Abrams
database of FTs must range of 8.5 to 18.6 mm2 1993) are lower compared
include all traits that are mg−1 (table 1). While to the values for TDF
relevant to acquisition and some leaf trait values of species (205 to 680 mmol
use of resources (Westoby TDF species are similar to m−2 s−1; table 1). On the
1998; Weiher et al. 1999). those of tropical evergreen contrary, Aarea, Nmass, Pmass
J. Biosci. 36(5), December 2011
968 RK Chaturvedi, AS Raghubanshi and JS Singh
and Cmass exhibited little
variation among regions
and species (table 1).
Generally, deciduous
trees maintain greater
Nmass than evergreen
species and consequently
maintain larger light
saturated assimilation rate
(Eamus 1999). Rdarea of
TDF species (0.6–1.9
μmol m−2 s−1; table 1) is
lower than that of desert
species (2.4 μmol m−2
s−1; Reich et al. 1998)
but is within

J. Biosci. 36(5), December 2011


Table 1. List of leaf traits of tree species in tropical deciduous forests

Species/Forest Mean Value Range ±1SE References


2 -1
Dry forest of Panama SLA
8.5 (n= 7) (mm mg
5.0) to 12.5 0.9 Santiago 2003
Deciduous forest of Australia 9.9 (n= 2) 9.0 to 10.7 0.8 Eamus and Prichard 1998
Dry forest of Costa Rica 10.2 (n=87) 5.5 to 23.0 3.6 Powers and Tiffin 2010
Deciduous forest of India 10.9 (n=54) 6.4 to 19.1 0.4 Lal et al. 2001
Deciduous forest of central-western Argentina 11.2 (n=16) 4.2 to 25.4 1.5 Vendramini et al. 2002
Deciduous forest of India 11.7 (n=6) 7.6 to 14.4 1.3 Chaturvedi et al. 2011
Dry forest of Panama 12.6 (n=6) 7.3 to 21.9 1.1 Kitajima et al. 1997
Deciduous forest of India 11.4 (n=7) 8.8 to 16.9 1.0 Pandey et al. 2009
Deciduous forest of central-western Argentina 15.0 (n=23) nk 1.2 Cornelissen et al. 1999
Dry forest of Venezuela 18.6 (n=6) 11.6 to 26.8 2.9 Sobrado 1991
Dry deciduous forest of Bolivia 20.7 (n=12) 11.5 to 26.9 6.0 Markesteijn et al. 2011

LA (cm2)

Dry monsoon forest of Australia 40.0 (n=4) 31.0 to 64.0 8.0 Prior et al. 2004
Dry deciduous forest of Bolivia 45.1 (n=12) 2.5 to 201 13.0 Markesteijn et al. 2011
Deciduous forest of India 75.9 (n=7) 26.4 to 143 17.6 Pandey et al. 2009

Chl (mg g-1)

Deciduous forest of India 0.93 (n=7) 0.72 to 1.26 0.08 Pandey et al. 2009
Deciduous forest of India 1.27 (n=6) 1.04 to 1.83 0.12 Chaturvedi et al. 2011

LDMC (% saturated wt.)

Deciduous forest of central-western Argentina 35.9 (n=13) 13.4 to 47.4 3.6 Vaieretti et al. 2007
Dry deciduous forest of Bolivia 32.2 (n=12) 23.0 to 48.0 9.3 Markesteijn et al. 2011

Nmass (%)

Savanna of Africa 1.3 (n= 4) 1.2 to 1.6 0.2 Manlay et al. 2002
Deciduous forest of Australia 1.4 (n= 2) 1.2 to 1.6 0.2 Eamus and Prichard 1998
Dry forest of Brazil 1.8 (n= 3) 1.4 to 2.1 0.3 Geßler et al. 2005
Deciduous forest of Australia 1.8 (n= 27) 0.8 to 4.0 0.3 Roderick et al. 1999
Deciduous forest of India 2.0 (n= 54) 0.9 to 3.2 0.1 Lal et al. 2001
Deciduous forest of Central Ethiopia 2.1 (n= 7) 1.7 to 3.2 0.3 Kindu et al. 2006
Deciduous forest of India 2.2 (n= 6) 1.9 to 2.5 0.1 Chaturvedi et al. 2011
Dry forest of Panama 2.3 (n= 8) nk 0.2 Santiago 2003
Dry forest of Costa Rica 2.3 (n= 87) 1.2 to 3.6 0.7 Powers and Tiffin 2010
Deciduous forest of Australia 2.4 (n= 6) 1.1 to 3.2 0.4 Prior et al. 2003
Dry forest of Panama 2.4 (n= 6) 1.5 to 3.8 0.3 Kitajima et al. 1997

LL (mo)

Deciduous forest of Australia 6.3 (n= 6) 4.8 to 8.2 0.5 Prior et al. 2003
Dry forest of Venezuela 8.4 (n= 6) 6.0 to 10.0 1.3 Sobrado 1991
Table 1 (continued)

Species/Forest Mean Value Range ±1SE References

Aarea (μmol m-2s-1)

Lowland forest of Panama 12.9 (n=16) 9.7 to 18.3 0.7 Santiago 2003
Dry forest of Panama 13.4 (n=6) 7.8 to 19.9 1.8 Kitajima et al. 1997
Deciduous forest of Australia 13.9 (n=6) 9.6 to 18.7 1.3 Prior et al. 2003
Deciduous forest of Australia 14.8 (n=2) 14.0 to 15.6 0.8 Eamus and Prichard 1998

Amass (nmol g-1s-1)

Dry forest of Panama 122.3 (n=7) 58.1 to 200.4 17.5 Santiago 2003
Deciduous forest of India 130.6 (n=6) 70.6 to 179.1 17.5 Chaturvedi et al. 2011
Deciduous forest of Australia 143.8 (n=2) 126.4 to 161.3 17.5 Eamus and Prichard 1998
Deciduous forest of Australia 175.8 (n=6) 129.0 to 250.0 16.7 Prior et al. 2003

Rdarea (μmol m-2s-1)

Deciduous forest of Australia 0.61 (n=2) 0.62 to 0.60 0.01 Eamus and Prichard 1998
Dry forest of Panama 1.90 (n=6) 2.90 to 0.80 0.20 Kitajima et al. 1997

gc (mmol m-2s-1)

Dry forest of Venezuela 204.8 (n=5) 140.7 to 274.8 23.0 Sobrado 1991
Deciduous forest of India 337.2 (n=6) 252.1 to 406.2 26.2 Chaturvedi et al. 2011
Dry forest of Panama 456.6 (n=7) 199.3 to 670.2 91.4 Santiago 2003
Dry forest of Panama 573.4 (n=6) 249.1 to 1306.6 127.5 Kitajima et al. 1997
Deciduous forest of Australia 680.0 (n=2) 620.0 to 750.0 65.0 Eamus and Prichard 1998

WUEi (μmol mol-1)

Deciduous forest of India 35.3 (n=6) 25.6 to 48.7 3.5 Chaturvedi et al. 2011
Savanna of central Venezuela 37.5 (n=3) 30.4 to 46.0 4.6 Medina and Francisco 1994
Tropical dry forest of Venezuela 44.8 (n=6) 36.0 to 53.0 2.7 Sobrado 1991

Pmass (%)

Savanna of Africa 0.07 (n=4) 0.05 to 0.09 0.01 Manlay et al. 2002
Dry forest of Costa Rica 0.11 (n=87) 0.06 to 0.20 0.04 Powers and Tiffin 2010
Deciduous forest of Australia 0.15 (n=6) 0.08 to 0.19 0.02 Prior et al. 2003
Deciduous forest of Central Ethiopia 0.18 (n=7) 0.15 to 0.30 0.03 Kindu et al. 2006
Deciduous forest of India 0.19 (n=6) 0.16 to 0.26 0.01 Chaturvedi et al. 2011
Deciduous forest of India 0.21 (n=54) 0.08 to 0.52 0.01 Lal et al. 2001

LSCmax (mmol m-1s-1MPa-1)

Lowland forest of Panama 53.8 (n=16) 15.8 to 120.7 6.8 Santiago 2003
Dry deciduous forest of Bolivia 42.7 (n=12) 8.0 to 81.0 12.3 Markesteijn et al. 2011
Dry tropical forest of Costa Rica 19.3 (n=3) 15.0 to 25.0 11.2 Brodribb and Holbrook 2003a
Table 1 (continued)

Species/Forest Mean Value Range ±1SE References

E (mmol m-2s-1)

Dry forest of Venezuela 6.5 (n= 4) 5.2 to 7.7 0.5 Sobrado 1991
Deciduous forest of Australia 17.2 (n=2) 16.9 to 17.5 0.3 Eamus and Prichard 1998

CC (g glu.g-1)

Deciduous forest of Australia 1.2 (n= 2) 1.1 to 1.3 0.05 Eamus and Prichard 1998
Dry forest of Charallave, Venezuela 1.5 (n= 7) 1.4 to 1.6 0.02 Villar and Merino 2001

LWC (%)

Dry forest of Costa Rica 58.8 (n=87) 40.2 to 73.9 8.0 Powers and Tiffin 2010
Deciduous forest of central-western Argentina 60.4 (n=16) 38.0 to 83.0 3.0 Vendramini et al. 2002

Cmass (%)

Savanna of Africa 37.3 (n=4) 35.8 to 39.7 1.3 Manlay et al. 2002
Deciduous forest of India 42.8 (n=54) 32.0 to 47.7 0.4 Lal et al. 2001
Dry forest of Brazil 43.0 (n=2) 42.7 to 43.3 0.6 Geßler et al. 2005
Deciduous forest of India 43.3 (n=6) 41.6 to 44.3 0.4 Chaturvedi et al. 2011
Dry forest of Costa Rica 45.9 (n=87) 37.6 to 52.3 3.3 Powers and Tiffin 2010
Deciduous forest of India 46.3 (n=8) 44.8 to 47.4 0.7 Negi et al. 2003
Dry forest of Panama 49.0 (n=8) nk 0.8 Santiago 2003
Deciduous forest of Australia 49.2 (n=27) 0.41 to 57.6 1.4 Roderick et al. 1999

Namass (%)

Deciduous forest of India 0.07 (n=25) nk 0.01 Singh and Singh 1991

Kmass (%)

Deciduous forest of Central Ethiopia 1.4 (n= 7) 1.0 to 1.9 0.2 Kindu et al. 2006

Camass (%)

Deciduous forest of India 1.2 (n= 8) 0.6 to 2.3 0.3 Negi et al. 2003

Thickness (mm)

Deciduous forest of Australia 0.3 (n= 6) 0.2 to 0.5 0.04 Prior et al. 2003
Deciduous forest of central-western Argentina 0.4 (n= 16) 0.2 to 0.6 0.03 Vendramini et al. 2002

n=number of species, nk= not known. SLA (specific leaf area); LA (leaf area); Chl (chlorophyll concentration); LDMC (leaf dry matter
content); LSCmax (maximum leaf specific hydraulic conductivity); A area (area-based leaf maximum photosynthetic rate); A mass (mass-
based leaf maximum photosynthetic rate); Rd area (area-based dark respiration rate); E (leaf transpiration rate); g c (leaf stomatal
conductance); WUEi (intrinsic water use efficiency); CC (leaf construction cost); LWC (leaf water content); N mass (mass-based nitrogen
concentration); LL (leaf life-span); P mass (mass-based phosphorus concentration); C mass (mass-based carbon concentration); Na mass (mass-
based sodium concentration); Kmass (mass-based potassium concentration); Camass (mass-based calcium concentration).
the range of 0. 8–1.3 μmol m−2 s−1 observed for tropical
density and leaf thickness. LWC, although not typically
evergreen, temperate evergreen, temperate deciduous and
considered as a plant functional trait, is important for
tundra species (Reich et al. 1998). Santiago (2003)
properties such as flammability and can be quantified
observed greater mean value of LSCmax in evergreen
through remote sensing (Powers and Tiffin 2010). Leaf-
species (83.4 mmol m−1 s−1MPa−1) than the deciduous
area-based maximum photosynthetic rate (Aarea) and stomatal
species (19. 3 mmol m−1 s−1MPa−1) of Costa Rica. conductance are positively correlated with maximum
Growth potential of a species is an integrated outcome of specific hydraulic conductivity (LSCmax) of leaf (Santiago et
responses of various traits and is particularly determined by al. 2004). Chl is highly correlated with LNC (Marino et al.
its leaf traits. A study in an abandoned grazing land in 2010). According to Loranger and Shipley (2010), thicker
Australia proved SLA as the best predictor of response to leaves have high stomatal density and low Chl. Many
land-use change (Meers et al. 2008). Bertiller et al. (2006) studies have shown that the photochemical part of the
have studied leaf strategies and soil nitrogen across a photosynthetic apparatus increases relative to the
regional humidity gradient in Patagonia and reported that biochemical part at low light to enhance light harvesting
the leaf traits related to carbon fixation and the and provide the energy for carbon fixation (see Kull 2002
decomposition pathway significantly varied with humidity. for a review). This acclimation pattern is expected to lead to
Wright et al. (2004b) identified six leaf traits that together an increased chlorophyll-to- nitrogen ratio in low light
capture many essentials of carbon economy of the leaf: (Hallik et al. 2009). Leaf area (LA), the one-sided projected
LMA, Amass, leaf nitrogen concentration (LNC), leaf surface area of the leaf, is an essential component of plant
phosphorus concentration (LPC), rate of dark respiration growth analysis and evapo- transpirational studies. It also
(Rdmax) and leaf lifespan (LL). LMA measures investment has large influence on transpitation rate (E) (Enoch and
of dry matter per unit of light- intercepting leaf area Hurd 1979). It is useful in the analysis of canopy
deployed. LMA can be calculated as 1/ SLA. High LMA architecture as it allows determination of LAI. It is related
means a thicker leaf blade or denser tissue, or both. Amass is to canopy light interception and photosynthetic efficiency
the photosynthetic assimilation rate measured under high and contributes to the carbohydrate metabolism, dry matter
light, ample soil moisture and ambient CO 2. Stomatal accumulation, yield and RGR (Leith et al. 1986, Williams
conductance and the drawdown of CO2 concentration inside 1987; Centritto et al. 2000). Leaf construction cost (CC) is
the leaf (carboxylation capacity) influence Amass. While considered as the energy invested by plants to synthesize
Amass in deciduous species is zero during the dry period carbon skeletons and nitrogenous compounds (Baruch and
when trees are leafless, the decline in A mass is much less Goldstein 1999). Indirectly CC can also be related to
under low water conditions in mature evergreen tree efficiency of resource utilization (Williams et al. 1987;
species (15–50%) and semi-deciduous species (25–75%) Lambers and Poorter 1992; Griffin 1994).
(Eamus 1999). Leaf nitrogen is integral to the proteins of
According to Chapin (1980), low LNC and LPC are
photosynthetic machinery, especially RuBisCo, which is
characteristics of plants having relatively high nutrient-
responsible for drawdown of CO2 inside the leaf. The
use efficiency. In unproductive habitats, plant species
drawdown of CO2 is also affected by leaf structure.
increase leaf carbon content (C mass) by accumulating
Phosphorus occurs in nucleic acids, lipid membranes and
many carbon-based secondary compounds including
bioenergetic molecules such as ATP. According to
lignin and tannins (Coley et al. 1985; Lambers and
Westoby and Wright (2006), leaf N:P ratio increases with
Poorter 1992), and it has been suggested that leaves of
temperature, and species with lower absolute LNC and LPC
species accumulating these compounds have high CC
tend to have higher N:P ratio, which in turn is associated
(Miller and Stoner 1979). In other studies, concentration
with slow leaf-specific growth rates. The mean N:P ratio of
of nutrients such as nitrogen, phosphorus, sodium,
tree leaves for deciduous woody species is lower than that
potassium and calcium in leaves control retranslocation
for evergreens (Wright et al. 2004a). Leaf dark respiration
of nitrogen and phosphorus from senescing leaves
rate per unit mass (Rdmass) reflects metabolic expenditure of
(Loneragan et al. 1976). Plants having high nutrient
photosynthate, especially protein turnover and phloem-
concentration in leaves retranslocate larger proportions of
loading of photosynthates and is related to LMA (Reich
nitrogen and phosphorus than do plants with low nutrient
et al. 1997). LL describes the average duration of the
status (Miller et al. 1976; Turner and Olson 1976). All the
revenue stream from each leaf constructed. Long LL
above-mentioned traits exhibit plasticity. Plasticity is
requires robust construction in the form of high LMA.
particularly high along moisture gradients, being the least
There are other leaf traits that are either directly or
in the dry forest and greatest in the moist forest tree species
indirectly associated with the above-mentioned traits.
(Markesteijn et al. 2007). Studies also indicate that there is
According to Vendramini et al. (2002), variation in SLA
no substantial change in species ranking for these traits in
depends on changes in leaf tissue density or leaf water
time or across different environments (Jurik 1986;
content (LWC), which is closely correlated with tissue
Thompson et al. 1997; Garnier et al. 2001).
3.2 Stem and root traits major natural or anthropogenic disturbance could prove an

For the maintenance of physiological activity of dry forest


species, the minimum seasonal water potential is
ecologically relevant (Bhaskar and Ackerly 2006). Wright
et al. (2006) studied many leaf and stem traits and found
that their coordinated effect is very important for a plant’s
water use efficiency. Therefore, study of stem and root
traits along with leaf traits are important to detect the effect
of water stress on the physiology of dry tropical plant
species. Also, FTs which enable acquisition of limiting
nutrients such as extensive root foraging and/or association
with mycorrhizal fungi may be important for C dynamics
(de Deyn et al. 2008).
Stem FTs include specific stem density (SSD) or wood-
specific gravity, which is directly associated with soil water
availability (Preston et al. 2006), and above-ground wood
productivity along with species maximum height (Baker et
al. 2008). Increasing wood density is associated with
decline in wood water content, and hence its potential for
water storage (Borchert 1994). SSD has been emphasized
for studying the rehydration processes in species showing
variable duration of deciduousness (Eamus and Prior 2001)
– it is a good predictor of resistance to drought-driven
embolism (Sperry 2003). Higher SSD appears to be related
to smaller leaf and twig sizes (Westoby and Wright 2006).
Other stem FTs include twig dry matter content (TDMC)
and bark thickness, which helps plants survive lethally high
temperature associ- ated with fire. Since aboveground and
belowground plant traits involved in C cycling are weakly
coupled, identification of easily measurable, cost-effective,
aboveground traits that may capture belowground C
dynamics is an important area of research (de Deyn et al.
2008).
Among other structural traits, plant stature (herb, shrub,
tree), leaf area index (LAI) or crown depth, bark thickness,
rooting depth, tree/root architecture, tree lifespan, plant
architecture (DBH to height curve), maximum size/height
may be important for the drought tolerance capability in TDF
trees. Other stem and root traits such as nitrogen content
(Nmass), phosphorus content (Pmass), carbon content (Cmass),
sodium content (Namass), potassium content (Kmass) and
calcium content (Camass) are also associated with the
physiology of TDF tree species; however, the work on these
aspects of plant traits in TDF is scarce (tables 2 and 3).
Compared to other traits listed in tables 2 and 3, SSD is
highly variable among regions (0.37–0.73 g cm−3) and among
species (e.g. dry forest of Costa Rica, 0.19–1.20 g cm−3).
Borchert (1994) reported a greater mean value of SSD in
deciduous trees (0.73 g cm−3) compared to evergreen trees
(0.60 g cm−3). The limited data in table 2 indicate about
threefold difference in stem Nmass among TDF species. The
significance of these variations, however, remains to be
examined.
Regenerative traits especially resprouting capacity after
important trait in the TDF facing a high population load
(pers. observation).

3.3 Reproductive traits

A large number of reproductive traits are important for the


success of a tree species in dry tropical environment.
Some of these are fruit number, fruit mass, seed weight,
seed viability, time period for seed germination (table 4),
number of seeds, dispersal distance, specialized
pollination/dispersal, maturity age/size, seed production and
reproductive phenology. Dispersal ability is strongly
influenced by the seed size of a species (Khurana et al.
2006). Smaller seeds have greater dispersal ability as
compared to heavier and larger seeds but the seedlings
produced by heavier, larger seeds have greater competitive
ability, enabling them to establish and survive under various
stresses such as competition, moisture, shading,
disturbances, defoliation and herbivory (Khurana et al.
2006). The above advantages of the seed size cause the
structure of the TDF to be largely determined by the
medium- to large-seeded species (Khurana et al. 2006).

3.4 Functional traits syndrome for maintaining


growth in seasonally dry environments

The total amount of rainfall sets limits to distribution of


forests in the tropics (Holdridge 1967; Walter 1979; White
1983; Woodward 1987; Portillo-Quintero and Sánchez-
Azofeifa 2010). Research indicates that spatial and
temporal variation in soil water availability determines
intra- and inter-annual patterns of growth, productivity
and survival within seasonal forests (Baker et al. 2003a;
Baker et al. 2003b; Urbeita et al. 2008; Sánchez-
Coronado et al. 2007; Namirembe et al. 2008). The
annual girth increment of deciduous species correlates
positively with rainfall during the middle of the wet
season (Bullock 1997) and also with total rainfall during
the previous 2 years (Whigham et al. 1990). This
observation is also verified by tree ring studies in
seasonal forests of Panama (Devall et al. 1995).
It is evident that TDF species maintain a set of FTs
which leads to their survival in seasonally dry
environments by conserving water. They may achieve this
by reducing their LL and modulating leaf FTs in such a
way that a higher rate of photosynthesis is maintained
during the brief period of water availability favourable for
the physiological processes essential for the plant growth
during that period. However, there is incomplete
knowledge about many FTs involved and further research
efforts are needed to study these and to develop a database
of FTs of TDF species. Our review of FTs indicates that
TDF species generally have a higher SLA, LNC, Nmass, gc
and light saturated photosynthetic rate and a
Table 2. List of stem traits of tree species in tropical deciduous forests

Species/Forest Mean Value Range ±1SE References

Dry deciduous forest of Bolivia cm-3to


0.37 (n= 12) SSD (g0.19 ) 0.52 0.11 Markesteijn et al. 2011
Dry forest of Costa Rica 0.40 (n= 18) 0.16 to 0.78 0.04 Wiemann and Williamson 1989
Deciduous forest of Panama 0.51 (n= 16) 0.35 to 0.70 0.02 Santiago 2003
Deciduous forest of India 0.58 (n= 7) 0.37 to 0.75 0.04 Chaturvedi et al. 2010
Dry forest of Costa Rica 0.72 (n= 26) 0.19 to 1.20 0.05 Borchert 1994
Deciduous forest of Mexico 0.73 (n= 21) 0.27 to 1.39 0.09 Huante et al. 1995

Nmass (%)

Dry forest of Brazil 0.25 (n= 2) 0.20 to 0.30 0.10 Geßler et al. 2005
Savanna of Africa 0.25 (n= 4) 0.16 to 0.45 0.10 Manlay et al. 2002
Deciduous forest of Central Ethiopia 0.28 (n= 7) 0.20 to 0.34 0.03 Kindu et al. 2006

Pmass (%)

Deciduous forest of Central Ethiopia 0.02 (n= 7) 0.01 to 0.03 0.04 Kindu et al. 2006
Savanna of Africa 0.03 (n= 4) 0.02 to 0.04 0.01 Manlay et al. 2002

Cmass (%)

Savanna of Africa 37.6 (n= 4) 36.5 to 38.8 0.31 Manlay et al. 2002
Dry forest of Brazil 43.0 (n= 2) 42.7 to 43.3 0.61 Geßler et al. 2005
Deciduous forest of India 47.3 (n= 8) 46.5 to 49.2 0.41 Negi et al. 2003

Namass (%)

Deciduous forest of India 0.08 (n= 25) nk 0.03 Singh and Singh 1991

Kmass (%)

Deciduous forest of Central Ethiopia 0.22 (n= 7) 0.14 to 0.46 0.06 Kindu et al. 2006

Camass (%)

Deciduous forest of India 0.35 (n= 8) 0.07 to 1.12 0.16 Negi et al. 2003

Bark Cmass (%)

Deciduous forest of India 38.8 (n= 8) 34.4 to 41.2 1.13 Negi et al. 2003

Bark Camass (%)

Deciduous forest of India 2.17 (n= 8) 1.00 to 4.30 0.54 Negi et al. 2003

n=number of species, nk=not known. SSD (stem specific density); N mass (mass-based nitrogen concentration); Pmass (mass-based
phosphorus concentration); Cmass (mass-based carbon concentration); Na mass (mass-based sodium concentration); K mass (mass-based
potassium concentration); Camass (mass-based calcium concentration).
Table 3. List of root traits of tree species in tropical deciduous forests

Species/Forest Mean Value Range ±1SE References

Nmass (%)
Deciduous forest of India 0.9 (n= 25) nk 0.1 Singh and Singh 1991
Dry forest of Brazil 1.2 (n= 3) 0.8 to 1.5 0.3 Geßler et al. 2005

Pmass (%)

Deciduous forest of India 0.06 (n= 25) nk 0.02 Singh and Singh 1991

Cmass (%)

Dry forest of Brazil 42.7 (n= 3) 39.7 to 47.4 0.61 Geßler et al. 2005

Namass (%)

Deciduous forest of India 0.09 (n= 25) nk 0.02 Singh and Singh 1991

Kmass (%)

Deciduous forest of India 0.31 (n= 25) nk 0.06 Singh and Singh 1991

Camass (%)

Deciduous forest of India 0.56 (n= 25) nk 0.13 Singh and Singh 1991

n=number of species, nk= not known. N mass (mass-based nitrogen concentration); P mass (mass-based phosphorus concentration); C mass
(mass-based carbon concentration); Namass (mass-based sodium concentration); K mass (mass-based potassium concentration); Ca mass (mass-
based calcium concentration).

lower LMA, LL and LSCmax compared to the tree species of as high cavitation resistance, strong stomatal control or the
other biomes. SLA and LNC relates positively to LL and, in maintenance of tissue turgor pressure at low leaf water
combination, accurately predicts the maximum photosynthetic potentials. Other studies also support these observations. For
rate across the species (Reich et al. 1997). Therefore, a trait example, Li et al. (2009) studied adaptation responses to
set of high SLA, LNC and Nmass is expected to lead to high different water conditions and the drought tolerance of
light saturated photosynthetic rates. Observations in four Sophora davidii seedlings in a greenhouse experiment and
lowland Panamanian forests also indicate that nitrogen content found that water stress decreased leaf relative water content,
per unit mass and light- and CO2-saturated photosynthetic SLA, leaf area ratio and WUE, whereas it increased the
rate per unit mass of upper canopy leaves decreases with biomass allocation to roots, which resulted in a higher root:
annual precipitation, while leaf thickness increases and SLA stem mass ratio under drought.
decreases (Santiago et al. 2004). Similarly, relatively high gc
(205–680 mmol m−2 s−1), together with relatively short LL 4. Plant functional types
(6–8 mo) and LSCmax (19–54 mmol m−1 s−1MPa−1) are
expected to confer a selective advantage in seasonally dry It is being increasingly realized that, in order to understand the
environments. Because gc plays an important role in plant– interaction of plants and ecosystem processes and their
atmosphere water exchange by relating positively to the rate potential response to global environmental changes, groups of
of photosynthesis, high gc may be essential in the deciduous species with shared characteristics, known as plant functional
species with short LL to optimally utilize resources in a types (PFTs), need to be identified. Groupings of plant
limited duration of favourable soil moisture. Markesteijn et species on the basis of FTs can yield information on the
al. (2010) have also reviewed literature to show that tolerance relative contribution of each PFT to total ecosystem plant
to water stress by plants is codetermined by a suite of FTs biomass (Hoorens et al. 2010). Inter-specific variation in
such FTs can help in the
Table 4. List of reproductive traits of tree species in tropical deciduous forests

Species/Forest Mean Value Range ±1SE References

Fruit no. per tree


Dry forest of Costa Rica 271 (n= 7) 4 to 1182 219 Rockwood 1973

Fruit wt. (g)

Dry forest of Costa Rica 108 (n= 7) 1.3 to 385 88.2 Rockwood 1973

Seed wt. (mg)

Deciduous forest of Mexico 184 (n= 22) 0.66 to 1622 116 Huante et al. 1995
Deciduous forest of India 316 (n= 37) 0.10 to 2224 84.6 Khurana et al. 2006
Deciduous forest of India 1229 (n= 99) 1.0 to 20000 670 Murali 1997

Seed viability (days)

Deciduous forest of India 256 (n=99) 5 to 720 38.1 Murali 1997

Period for seed germination (days)

Deciduous forest of India 16.9 (n=98) 8 to 45 1.4 Murali 1997

n=number of species.

classification of plant species into PFTs (Von Willert et al. seasonal variation in their leaf traits. The seasonal pattern in
1990, 1992; Díaz and Cabido 1997; Lavorel et al. 1997; leaf traits, in general, was an early season peak in SLA, LNC
Westoby 1998; Gitay et al. 1999; Semenova and van der and LPC, and a midseason peak in stomatal conductance and
Maarel 2000; Powers and Tiffin 2010). These groupings of Amass, which was associated with increase in soil moisture.
plant species on the basis of common biological parameters
Annual forbs generally exhibited highest leaf trait values and
reduce a wide diversity of species to small number of
the perennial grasses the lowest.
functional groups, which enables the identification of general
Several PFTs, based on leaf phenology and wood
principles for the functioning of organisms which can be used
density, have been recognized in the dry forests of Costa
for making predictions (Duru et al. 2009). The identification Rica by Borchert (1994), ranging from deciduous hardwood
of tree PFTs through either deductive or inductive approaches and water-storing light wood trees in dry upland forest to
(Gitay and Noble 1997) is primarily limited by our restricted evergreen light soft-wood trees confined to moist lowland
knowledge of plant physiological attributes. This is particular- sites. Since plant growth rate integrates several traits
ly true for TDFs. Because the extent and intensity of seasonal underlying trade-offs among resource acquisition strategies,
drought in TDF may vary with geographical location, there defence against natural enemies and allocation to reproduc-
can be a mosaic of different PFTs showing varying tion, Baker et al. (2003a) classified plant species of the
adaptations to seasonal drought (Borchert 2000). With the semi-deciduous forest of Ghana into dry forest pioneers and
development of modern ecopysiological techniques, the wet forest pioneers on the basis of variations in their growth
definition of plant PFTs has shifted from primarily morpho- rates under different soil moisture conditions. Saldaña-
logical classifications (e.g. Raunkiaer 1907; Box 1981) to Acosta et al. (2008) classified 33 tree species of Mexican
function based groupings (e.g. Díaz and Cabido 1997; Lavorel cloud forest into two functional groups on the basis of SLA,
et al. 1997; Reich et al. 1998; Walker et al. 1999; Pausas and height at maturity, wood density and seed mass.
Lavorel 2003; Suding et al. 2008). Nevertheless, growth-form Sagar and Singh (2003) categorized trees of Indian TDF on
categories continue to attract attention. Dubey et al. (2011) the basis of leaf size, leaf texture, deciduousness and bark
grouped TDF herbs into annual grasses, perennial grasses, texture and found that both the percent of species and
annual forbs and perennial forbs, and studied the intra- importance values were larger for medium or low deciduous
categories than for highly deciduous trait, representing a trade-
Aubin I, Ouellette M-H, Legendre P, Messier C and Bouchard A
off between water loss and the period of dry matter synthesis. 2009 Comparison of two plant functional approaches to
The tree vegetation was characterized by the preponderance of evaluate natural restoration along an old-field–deciduous forest
and domination by species having a combination of small leaf chronosequence. J. Veg. Sci. 20 185–198
size (below 201 cm2 leaf area), medium leaf texture, rough Baker TR, Burslem DFRP and Swaine MD 2003a Associations
bark texture and medium deciduousness (2–3 mo deciduous). between tree growth, soil fertility and water availability at local
However, habitats could not be discriminated, either by the and regional scales in Ghanaian tropical rain forest. J. Trop.
proportion of species belonging to different trait categories or Ecol. 19 109–125
by the cumulative importance value of the trait categories. Baker TR, Phillips OL, Laurance WF, Pitman NCA, Almeida S,
Arroyo L, DiFiore A, Erwin T, et al. 2008 Do species traits
Thus, although a few attempts have been made to characterize
determine patterns of wood production in Amazonian forests?
and classify dry deciduous forest trees into plant PFTs, Biogeosci. Disc. 5 3593–3621
there is no universally acceptable suite of traits that can Baker TR, Swaine MD and Burslem DFRP 2003b Variation in
be used to predict the response of the dry forest tropical forest growth rates: combined effects of functional
ecosystem to environmental changes. group composition and resource availability. Perspect. Plant.
Ecol. Evol. Syst. 6 37– 49
5. Research needs with particular reference to TDF Baruch Z and Goldstein G 1999 Leaf construction cost, nutrient
concentration, and net CO2 assimilation of native and invasive
species in Hawaii. Oecologia 121 183–192
The information on plant functional traits and their capacity Bertiller MB, Mazzarino MJ, Carrera AL, Diehl P, Satti P, Gobbi
to predict changes in environment and species composition, M and Sain CL 2006 Leaf strategies and soil N across a
with particular reference to TDFs, is incomplete and regional humidity gradient in Patagonia. Oecologia 148 612–
fragmentary. The demand for detailed studies on plant FTs 624
of TDF persists for the effective restoration of the forest Bhaskar R and Ackerly DD 2006 Ecological relevance of minimum
ecosystem and predicting the effects of climate change. seasonal water potentials. Physiol. Plantarium 127 353–359
There is a need to develop a comprehensive list of Bohlman SA 2010 Landscape patterns and environmental controls
ecologically significant functional traits, and to determine of deciduousness in forests of central Panama. Global Ecol.
the coordination among them and the relationships between Biogeogr. 19 376–385
the traits and habitat conditions of the dry tropical forest Borchert R 1994 Soil and stem water storage determine
biome. For this a well-authenticated database is needed, phenology and distribution of tropical dry forest trees.
Ecology 75 1437 – 1449
which could then help in grouping species into PFTs and in
Borchert R 2000 Organismic and environmental controls of bud
developing predictive models that could explain species growth in tropical trees; in Dormancy in plants: From whole
distributions and productivity, and effect of changes in plant behavior to cellular control (eds) JD Viemont and J
environment such as disturbance regime and climate. Crabbe (Wallingford: CAB International) pp 87–107
Box EO 1981 Macroclimate and plant forms: An introduction to
Acknowledgements predictive modeling in phytogeography (The Hague, NL: Junk)
Brenes-Arguedas T, Coley PD and Kursar TA 2009 Pests vs.
The authors thank the Ministry of Environment and Forests, drought as determinants of plant distribution along a tropical
rainfall gradient. Ecology 90 1751–1761
India, for the financial support. JSS is supported under
Brienen RJW, Zuidema PA and Martínez-Ramos M 2010 Attain-
NASI Senior Scientist Scheme. The corresponding editor
ing the canopy in dry and moist tropical forests: strong
and the anonymous reviewers are thanked for their valuable
differences in tree growth trajectories reflect variation in
suggestions to improve the manuscript. growing conditions. Oecologia 163 485–496
Brodribb TJ and Holbrook NM 2003a Changes in leaf hydraulic
References conductance during leaf shedding in seasonally dry tropical
forest. New Phytol. 158 295–303
Brodribb TJ and Holbrook NM 2003b Stomatal closure during leaf
Ackerly DD and Cornwell WK 2007 A trait-based approach to
dehydration, correlation with other leaf physiological traits.
community assembly: partitioning of species trait values
Plant Physiol. 132 2166–2173
into within- and among- community components. Ecol. Lett.
Brodribb TJ, Holbrook NM, Edwards EJ and Gutiérrez MV 2003
10 135–145
Relations between stomatal closure, leaf turgor and xylem
Aerts R and Chapin FS 2000 The mineral nutrition of wild
vulnerability in eight tropical dry forest trees. Plant Cell
plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns.
Environ. 26 443–450
Adv. Ecol. Res. 30 1–67
Bullock S 1997 An exploration of signalling behaviour by both
Arnold AE and Asquith NM 2002 Herbivory in a fragmented
analytic and simulation means for both discrete and continuous
tropical forest: patterns from islands at Lago Gatún, Panama.
models; in Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on
Biodiversity. Conserv. 11 1663–1680
Artificial Life (eds) P Husbands and I Harvey (Cambridge, MA:
The MIT Press) pp 454–463
Campo J and Dirzo R 2003 Leaf quality and herbivory responses
to soil nutrient addition in secondary tropical dry forests of Díaz S and Cabido M 2001 Vive la difference: plant functional
Yucatán, Mexico. J. Trop. Ecol. 19 525–530 diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends Ecol. Evol.
Centritto M, Loreto R, Massacci A, Pietrini R, Villani MC and 16 646–655
Zacchine M 2000 Improved growth and water use efficiency of Díaz S, Cabido M, Zak M, Martinez Carretero E and Aranibar J
cherry saplings under reduced light intensity. Ecol. Res. 1999 Plant functional traits, ecosystem structure and land-use
15 385–392 history along a climate gradient in central-western Argentina.
Champion HG and Seth SK 1968 General silviculture for India J. Veg. Sci. 10 651–660
(Delhi: Publication Division, Government of India) Díaz S, Hodgson JG, Thompson K, Cabido M, Cornelissen JHC,
Chapin FS 1980 The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annu. Rev. Jalili A, Montserrat-Marti G, Grime JP, et al. 2004 The plant
Plant. Physiol. 11 233–260 traits that drive ecosystems: evidence from three continents.
Chapin F III, Zavelta E, Eviner V, Naylor R, Vitousek P, J. Veg. Sci. 15 295–304
Reynolds H, Hooper D, Lavorel S, et al. 2000 Consequences of Díaz S, McIntyre S, Lavorel S and Pausas JG 2002 Does hairiness
changing biodiversity. Nature (London) 405 234–242 matter in Harare? Resolving controversy in global comparisons
Chaturvedi RK, Raghubanshi AS and Singh JS 2011 Leaf of plant trait responses to ecosystem disturbance. New Phytol.
attributes and tree growth in a tropical dry forest. J. Veg. Sci. 154 7–9
22 917–931 Díaz S, Noy-Meir I and Cabido M 2001 Can grazing response of
Chaturvedi RK, Raghubanshi AS and Singh JS 2010 Non- herbaceous plants be predicted from simple vegetative
destructive estimation of tree biomass by using wood specific traits? J. Appl. Ecol. 38 497–508
gravity in the estimator. Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett. 33 133–138 Díaz S, Symstad AJ, Chapin FS, Wardle DA and Huenneke LF
Coley PD 1998 Possible effects of climate change on plant/ 2003 Functional diversity revealed by removal experiments.
herbivore interactions in moist tropical forests. Clim. Change Trends Ecol. Evol. 18 140–46
39 455–472 Dubey P, Raghubanshi AS and Singh JS 2011 Intra-seasonal
Coley PD and Barone JA 1996 Herbivory and plant defenses in variation and relationship among leaf traits of different forest
tropical forest. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27 305 – 335 herbs in a dry tropical environment. Curr. Sci. 100 69–76
Coley PD, Bryant JP and Chapin FS 1985 Resource availability Duru M, Khaled RAH, Ducourtieux C, Theau JP, de Quadros FLF
and plant herbivore defence. Science 230 895–899 and Cruz P 2009 Do plant functional types based on leaf dry
Cornelissen JHC and Thompson K 1997 Functional leaf attributes matter content allow characterizing native grass species and
predicts litter decomposition rate in herbaceous plants. New grasslands for herbage growth pattern? Plant Ecol. 201 421–
Phytol. 135 109–114 433
Cornelissen JHC, Lavorel S, Garnier E, Díaz S, Buchmann N, Eamus D and Prichard H 1998 A cost-benefit analysis of leaves of
Gurvich DE, Reich PB, ter Steege H, et al. 2003 A handbook four Australian savanna species. Tree Physiol. 18 537–545
of protocols for standardized and easy measurement of plant Eamus D and Prior L 2001 Ecophysiology of trees of seasonally
functional traits worldwide. Aust. J. Bot. 51 335–380 dry tropics: comparisons anong phonologies. Adv. Ecol. Res.
32 113–197
Cornelissen JHC, Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Díaz S, Grime JP,
Eamus D 1999 Ecophysiological traits of deciduous and evergreen
Marzano B, Cabido M, Vendramini F and Cerabolini B 1999
woody species in the seasonally dry tropics. Trends Ecol. Evol.
Leaf structure and defence control litter decomposition rate
14 11–16
across species and life forms in regional flora on two
Enoch HZ and Hurd RG 1979 The effect of elevated CO 2
continents. New Phytol. 143 191–200
concentrations in the atmosphere on plant transpiration and
Craine JM, Wedin DA and Reich PB 2001 The response of soil
water use efficiency. A study with potted carnation plants. Int.
CO2 flux to changes in atmospheric CO 2, nitrogen supply, and
J. Biometeorol. 23 343–351
plant diversity. Global Change Biol. 7 947–953
Eviner VT and Chapin FS III 2003 Functionalmatrix: a conceptual
Cunningham SA, Summerhayes B and Westoby M 1999 Evolu-
framework for predicting multiple plant effects on ecosystem
tionary divergences in leaf structure and chemistry, comparing
processes. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34 455–485
rainfall and soil nutrient gradients. Ecol. Monogr. 69 569–588
Fallas-Cedeño L, Holbrook NM, Rocha OJ, Vásquez N and
de Bello F, Lavorel S, Díaz S, Harrington R, Cornelissen JHC,
Gutiérrez-Soto MV 2010 Phenology, lignotubers, and water
Bardgett RD, Berg MP, Cipriotti P, et al. 2010 Towards an
relations of Cochlospermum vitifolium, a pioneer tropical dry
assessment of multiple ecosystem processes and services via
forest tree in Costa Rica. Biotropica 42 104–111
functional traits. Biodiversity Conserv. 19 2873–2893
Franco AC, Bustamante M, Caldas LS, Goldstein G, Meinzer FC,
de Deyn GB, Cornelissen JHC and Bardgett RD 2008 Plant
Kozovits AR, Rundel P and Coradin VTR 2005 Leaf functional
functional traits and soil carbon sequestration in contrasting
traits of Neotropical savanna trees in relation to seasonal water
biomes. Ecol. Lett. 11 516–531
deficit. Trees 19 326–335
Devall MS, Parresol BR and Wright SJ 1995 Dendroecological
Freitas ADS, Sampaio EVSB, Santos CERS and Fernandes AR
analysis of Cordia alliodora, Pseudobombax septenatum and
2010 Biological nitrogen fixation in tree legumes of the
Annona spraguei in central Panama. IAWA J. 16 411–424
Brazilian semi-arid caatinga. J. Arid. Environ. 74 344–349
Díaz S and Cabido M 1997 Plant functional types and ecosystem
Garnier E 1991 Resource capture, biomass allocation and growth
function in relation to global change. J .Veg. Sci. 8 463 – 474
in herbaceous plants. Trends. Ecol. Evol. 6 126–131
Garnier E, Lavorel S, Ansquer P, Castro H, Cruz P, Dolezal J, land-use change on plant traits, communities and ecosystem
Eriksson O, Fortunel C, et al. 2007 Assessing the effects of functioning in grasslands: a standardized methodology and
lessons from an application to 11 European sites. Ann. Bot. 99
967–985 Hillebrand H and Matthiessen B 2009 Biodiversity in a complex
Garnier E, Shipley B, Roumet C and Laurent G 2001 A world: Consolidation and progress in functional biodiversity
standardized protocol for the determination of specific leaf area research. Ecol. Let. 12 1–15
and leaf dry matter content. Funct. Ecol. 15 688–695 Högberg P 1992 Root symbioses of trees in African dry tropical
Geber MA and Griffen LR 2003 Inheritance and natural selection forests. J. Veg. Sci. 3 393–400
on functional traits. Int. J. Plant Sci. 164 21–42 Högberg P and Alexander IJ 1995 Roles of root symbioses in
Gerhardt K 1993 Tree seedling development in tropical dry African woodland and forest: evidence from 15N abundance and
abandoned pasture and secondary forest in Costa Rica. foliar analysis. J. Ecol. 83 217–224
J. Veg. Sci. 4 95–102 Holdridge LR 1967 Life zone ecology (San Jose, Costa Rica:
Geßler A, Duarte HM, Franco AC, Lüttge U, de Mattos EA, Tropical Science Centre,)
Nahm M, Rodrigues PJFP, Scarano FR and Rennenberg H Hoorens B, Stroetenga M and Aerts R 2010 Litter Mixture
2005 Ecophysiology of selected tree species in different plant Interactions at the level of plant functional types are additive.
communities at the periphery of the Atlantic Forest of SE— Ecosystems 13 90–98
Brazil III. Three legume trees in a semi-deciduous dry forest. Horton JL, Kolb TE and Hart SC 2001 Leaf gas exchange
Trees 19 523–530 characteristics differ among Sonoran Desert riparian tree
Gitay H and Noble IR 1997 What are functional types and how species. Tree Physiol. 21 233–241
should we seek them? in Plant functional types: Their Huante P, Rincón E and Acosta I 1995 Nutrient availability and
relevance to ecosystem properties and global change (eds) TM growth rate of 34 woody species from a tropical deciduous
Smith, HH Shugart and FI Woodward (Cambridge: Cambridge forest in Mexico. Funct. Ecol. 9 849–858
University Press) pp 3–19 Ishida A, Diloksumpun S, Ladpala P, Staporn D, Panuthai S, Gamo
Gitay H, Noble IR and Connell JH 1999 Deriving functional types M, Yazaki K, Ishizuka M and Puangchit L 2006 Contrasting
for rainforest trees. J. Veg. Sci. 10 641–650 seasonal leaf habits of canopy trees between tropical dry-
Gotsch SG, Geiger EL, Franco AC, Goldstein G, Meinzer FC and deciduous and evergreen forests in Thailand. Tree Physiol. 26
Hoffmann WA 2010 Allocation to leaf area and sapwood area 643–656
affects water relations of co-occurring savanna and forest trees. Janzen DH 1970 Herbivores and the number of tree species in
Oecologia 163 291–301 tropical forests. Am. Nat. 104 501–528
Griffin KL 1994 Calorimetric estimates of construction cost and Jha CS and Singh JS 1990 Compositions and dynamics of dry
their use in ecological studies. Funct. Ecol. 8 551–562 tropical forest in relation to soil texture. J. Veg. Sci. 1 609–614
Grime JP 1997 Biodiversity and ecosystem function, the debate Jurik TW 1986 Temporal and spatial patterns of specific leaf
deepens. Science 277 1260–1261 weight in successional northern hardwood tree species.
Grime JP, Hodgson JG and Hunt R 1988 Comparative plant Am. J. Bot. 73 1083–1092
Keddy PA 1992 Assembly and response rules: two goals for
ecology. A functional approach to common British species
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) predictive ecology. J. Veg. Sci. 3 157–64
Khurana E, Sagar R and Singh JS 2006 Seed size: a key trait
Grime JP, Thompson K, Hunt R, Hodgson JG, Cornelissen JHC,
Riorison IH, Hendry GAF, Ashenden TW, et al. 1997 determining species distribution and diversity of dry tropical
Integrated screening validates primary axes of specialization in forest in northern India. Acta. Oecol. 29 196–204
Kindu M, Glatzel G, Tadesse Y and Yosef A 2006 Tree species
plants. Oikos 79 259–281
Gritti ES, Cassignat C, Flores O, Bonnefille R, Chalié F, Guiot J screened on Nitosols of central Ethiopia: biomass production,
nutrient contents and effect on soil nitrogen. J. Trop. For. Sci.
and Jolly D 2010 Simulated effects of a seasonal precipitation
18 173–180
change on thevegetation in tropical Africa. Clim. Past. 6 169–
178 Kitajima K, Mulkey SS and Wright SJ 1997 Seasonal leaf
phenotypes in the canopy of a tropical dry forest:
Hallik L, Kull O, Niinemets Ü and Aan A 2009 Contrasting
correlation networks between leaf structure, nitrogen and photosynthetic characteristics and associated traits. Oecologia
chlorophyll in herbaceous and woody canopies. Basic Appl. 109 490–498
Kooyman RM and Westoby M 2009 Costs of height gain in
Ecol. 10 309–318
Hayden B, Greene DF and Quesada M 2010 A field experiment to rainforest saplings: main-stem scaling, functional traits and
determine the effect of dry-season precipitation on annual ring strategy variation across 75 species. Ann. Bot. 104 987–993
formation and leaf phenology in a seasonally dry tropical Körner C, Bannister P and Mark AF 1986 Altitudinal variation in
forest. J. Trop. Ecol. 26 237–242 stomatal conductance, nitrogen content and leaf anatomy in
Hedin LO, Brookshire ENJ, Menge DNL and Barron AR 2009 different plant life forms in New Zealand. Oecologia 69 577–588
The Nitrogen Paradox in Tropical Forest Ecosystems. Annu. Kraft NJB, Valencia R and Ackerly DD 2008 Functional traits and
Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40 613–35 niche-based tree community assembly in an Amazonian forest.
Science 322 580–582
Kubiske ME and Abrams MD 1993 Stomatal and nonstomatal
limitations of photosynthesis in 19 temperate tree species on
contrasting sites during wet and dry years. Plant Cell Environ.
16 1123–1129
Kull O 2002 Acclimation of photosynthesis in canopies: models
and limitations. Oecologia 133 267–279
Lal CB, Annapurna C, Raghubanshi AS and Singh JS 2001 Effect
of leaf habit and soil type on nutrient resorption and McLaren JR and Turkington R 2010 Ecosystem properties
conservation in woody species of a dry tropical environment. determined by plant functional group identity. J. Ecol. 98 459–
Can. J. Bot. 79 1066–1075 469
Lambers H, Chapin FS III and Pons TL 1998 Plant Physiological Medina E and Francisco M 1994 Photosynthesis and water
Ecology (New York: Springer-Verlag) relations of savanna tree species differing in leaf phenology.
Lambers H and Poorter H 1992 Inherent variation in growth rate Tree Physiol. 14 1367–1381
between higher plants: a search for physiological causes and Meers TL, Bell TL, Enright NJ and Kasel S 2008 Role of plant
ecological consequences. Adv. Ecol. Res. 23 188–261 functional traits in determining vegetation composition of
Lavorel S, Díaz S, Cornelissen JHC, Garnier E, Harrison SP, abandoned grazing land in north-eastern Victoria, Australia.
McIntyre S, Pausas JG, Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Roumet C and J. Veg. Sci. 19 515–524
Urcelay C 2007 Plant functional types: are we getting any Miller HG, Cooper JM and Miller JD 1976 Effect of nutrients in
closer to the Holy Grail? in Terrestrial ecosystems in a litter fall and crown leaching in a stand of Corsican pine.
changing world (eds) Canadell JG, Pitelka LF and Pataki D J. Appl. Ecol. 13 233–248
(Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag) pp 149–165 Miller PC and Stoner WA 1979 Canopy structure and environ-
Lavorel S, McIntyre S, Landsberg J and Forbes TDA 1997 Plant mental interactions; in Topics in plant population biology (eds)
functional classifications: from general groups to specific OT Solbrig, S Jain, GB Johnson and PH Raven (New York:
groups based on response to disturbance. Trends Ecol. Evol. Colombia University Press) pp 428–458
12 474–478 MoEF 1999 National forestry action plan (New Delhi: Ministry of
Leith JH, Reynolds JP and Rogers HH 1986 Estimation of leaf Environment and Forests, Government of India,)
area of soybeans grown under elevated carbon dioxide levels. Mooney HA, Bullock SH and Medina E 1995 Introduction; in
Field Crops Res. 13 193–203 Seasonally dry tropical forests (eds) SH Bullock, HA Mooney
Li FL, Bao WK and Wu N 2009 Effects of water stress on growth, and E Medina (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
dry matter allocation and water-use efficiency of a leguminous pp 146–194
species, Sophora davidii. Agroforest Syst. 77 193–201 Mooney HA 2010 The ecosystem-service chain and the biological
Loneragan JF, Snowball K and Robson AD 1976 Remobilization diversity crisis. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 365 31–39
of nutrients and its significance in plant nutrition, Transport Mooney HA, Larigauderie A, Cesario M, Elmquist T, Hoegh-
and transfer processes in plants (eds) IF Wardlaw and JB Guldberg O, Lavorel S, Mace GM, Palmer M, Scholes R and
Pasioura (New York: Academic Press) pp 463–469 Yahara T 2009 Biodiversity, climate change, and ecosystem
Loranger J and Shipley B 2010 Interspecific covariation between services. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 1 46–54
stomatal density and other functional leaf traits in a local flora. Mouchet MA, Villéger S, Mason NWH and Mouillot D 2010
Botany 88 30–38 Functional diversity measures: an overview of their redundancy
Mac Gillivray CW and Grime JP and the integrated screening and their ability to discriminate community assembly rules.
programme (ISP) team 1995 Testing predictions of the Funct. Ecol. 24 867–876
resistance and resilience of vegetation subjected to extreme Murali 1997 Patterns of seed size, germination and seed viability
events. Funct. Ecol. 9 640–649 of tropical tree species in southern India. Biotropica 29 271 –279
Manlay RJ, Kairé M, Masse D, Chotte J-L, Ciornei G and Floret C Murphy PG and Lugo AE 1986 Ecology of tropical dry forest.
2002 Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus allocation in agro- Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17 67–88
ecosystems of a West African savanna: I. The plant component Namirembe S, Brook RM and Ong CK 2008 Manipulating
under semi- permanent cultivation. Agri., Ecosyst. Environ. 88 phenology and water relations in Senna spectabilis in a water
215–232 limited environment in Kenya. Agrofor. Syst. 75 197–210
Marino G, Aqil M and Shipley B 2010 The leaf economics Negi JDS, Manhas RK and Chauhan PS 2003 Carbon allocation in
spectrum and the prediction of photosynthetic light–response different components of some tree species of India: a new
curves. Funct. Ecol. 24 263–272 approach for carbon estimation. Curr. Sci. 85 1528–1531
Markesteijn L, Iraipi J, Bongers F and Poorter L 2010 Seasonal Niinemets Ü 1999 Components of leaf dry mass per area-thickness
variation in soil and plant water potentials in a Bolivian and density-alter leaf photosynthetic capacity in reverse
tropical moist and dry forest. J. Trop. Ecol. 26 497–508 directions in woody plants. New Phytol. 144 35–47
Markesteijn L, Poorter L, Bongers F, Paz H and Sack L 2011 Niinemets Ü and Tenhunen JD 1997 A model separating leaf
Hydraulics and life history of tropical dry forest tree structural and physiological effects on carbon gain along light
species: coordination of species’ drought and shade tolerance. gradients for the shade-tolerant species Acer saccharum. Plant
New Phytol. 191 480–495 Cell Environ. 20 845–866
Markesteijn L, Poorter L and Bongers F 2007 Light-dependent Niinemets Ü, Díaz-Espejo A, Flexas J, Galmés J and Warren CR
leaf trait variation in 43 tropical dry forest tree species. Am. J. 2009 Role of mesophyll diffusion conductance in constraining
potential photosynthetic productivity in the field. J. Exp. Bot.
Bot. 94 515–525
McIntyre S, Diaz S, Lavorel S and Cramer W 1999 Plant 60 2249–2270
functional types and disturbance dynamics – Introduction. J. Noble IR and Gitay H 1996 A functional classification for
Veg. Sci. 10 604–608 predicting the dynamics of landscapes. J. Veg. Sci. 7 329–336

Olivares E and Medina E 1992 Water and nutrient relations of Opler PA, Frankie GW and Baker HG 1980 Comparative phonolog-
woody perennials from tropical dry forests. J. Veg. Sci. 3 383– ical studies of Treelet and shrub species in tropical wet and dry
392 forests in the woodlands of Costa Rica. J. Ecol. 68 167–188
Pakeman RJ 2004 Consistency of plant species and trait responses
to grazing along a productivity gradient: a multi-site analysis. Reich PB, Walters MB and Ellsworth DS 1992 Leaf life-span in
J. Ecol. 92 893–905 relation to leaf, plant, and stand characteristics among diverse
Pandey SK, Singh H and Singh JS 2009 Species and site effects on ecosystems. Ecol. Monogr. 62 365–392
leaf traits of woody vegetation in a dry tropical environment. Reich PB, Walters MB and Ellsworth DS 1997 From tropics to
Curr. Sci. 96 1109–1114 tundra: global convergence in plant functioning. Proc. Nat.
Pausas JG and Lavorel S 2003 A hierarchical deductive approach Acad. Sci. USA 94 13730–13734
for functional types in disturbed ecosystems. J. Veg. Sci. Reich PB, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS, Vose JS, Volin JC,
14 409–416 Gresham C and Bowman WD 1998 Relationships of leaf dark
Pennington T, Lewis G and Ratter J 2006 Neotropical savannas respiration to leaf nitrogen, specific leaf area and leaf life-span:
and seasonally dry forests: plant diversity, biogeography and a test across biomes and functional groups. Oecologia
conservation (Florida: CRC Press) 114 471–482
Poorter H and Bergkotte M 1992 Chemical composition of 24 wild Rockwood LL 1973 The effect of defoliation on seed production
species differing in relative growth rate. Plant Cell Environ. of six Costa Rican tree species. Ecology 54 1363 – 1369
15 221–229 Roderick ML, Berry SL and Noble IR 1999 The relationship
Poorter H and Garnier E 1999 Ecological significance of inherent between leaf composition and morphology at elevated CO 2
variation in relative growth rate and its components; in concentrations. New Phytol. 143 63–72
Handbook of Functional Plant Ecology (eds) FI Pugnaire and Rozendaal DM A, Hurtado VH and Poorter L 2006 Plasticity in
F Valladares (New York: Marcel Dekker) pp 81–120 leaf traits of 38 tropical tree species inresponse to light;
Portillo-Quintero CA and Sánchez-Azofeifa GA 2010 Extent relationships with light demand and adult stature. Funct. Ecol.
and conservation of tropical dry forests in the Americas. 20 207–216
Biol. Conserv. 143 144–155 Ryel RJ, Ivans CY, Peek MS, and Leffler AJ 2008 Functional
Posada JM, Lechowicz MJ and Kitajima K 2009 Optimal differences in soil water pools: a new perspective on plant
photosynthetic use of light by tropical tree crowns achieved water use in water-limited ecosystems. Prog. Bot. 69 397–422
by adjustment of individual leaf angles and nitrogen content. Ryser P and Urbas P 2000 Ecological significance of leaf life span
Ann. Bot. 103 795–805 among Central European grass species. Oikos 91 41–50
Powers JS and Tiffin P 2010 Plant functional type classifications Sagar R and Singh JS 2003 Predominant phenotypic traits of
in tropical dry forests in Costa Rica: leaf habit versus disturbed tropical dry deciduous forests of northern India.
taxonomic approaches. Funct. Ecol. 24 927–936 Comm. Ecol. 4 63–71
Preston KA, Cornwell WK and DeNoyer JL 2006 Wood density Saha S and Howe HF 2003 Species composition and fire in a dry
and vessel traits as distinct correlates of ecological strategy in deciduous forest. Ecology 84 3118–3123
51 California coast range angiosperms. New Phytol. 170 807– Saldaña-Acosta A, Meave JA Paz H, Sánchez-Velásquez LR,
818 Villaseñor and Martínez-Ramos M 2008 Variation of
Prior LD, Bowman DMJS and Eamus D 2004 Seasonal functional traits in trees from a biogeographically complex
differences in leaf attributes in Australian tropical tree species: Mexican cloud forest. Acta Oecologia 34 111–121
family and habit comparisons. Funct. Ecol. 18 707–718 Sánchez-Azofeifa GA, Quesada M, Rodr´ıguez JP, Nassar JM,
Prior LD, Eamus D and Bowman DMJS 2003 Leaf attributes in Stoner KE, Castillo A, Garvin T, Zent EL, Calvo-Alvarado JC,
the seasonally dry tropics: a comparison of four habitats in Kalacska MER, Fajardo L, Gamon JA and Cuevas-Reyes P
northern Australia. Funct. Ecol. 17 504–515 2005 Research priorities for Neotropical dry forests. Biotropica
Raherison SM and Grouzis M 2005 Plant biomass, nutrient 37 477–485
concentration and nutrient storage in a tropical dry forest in Sánchez-Coronado ME, Coates R, Castro-Colina L, Gamboa de
the south–west of Madagascar. Plant Ecol. 180 33–45 Buen L, Paez-Valencia J, Barradas VL, Huante P and Orozco-
Raunkiaer C 1907 Planterigets livsformer og deres Betydning for Segovia A 2007 Improving seed germination and seedling
Geographyrafien (Copenhagen, Denmark: Munksgaard) growth of Omphalea oleifera (Euphorbiaceae) for restoration
Reich PB, Ellsworth DS and Uhl C 1995 Leaf carbon and nutrient projects in tropical rain forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 243 144–
assimilation and conservation in species of differing succes- 155
sional status in an oligotrophic Amazonian forest. Funct. Ecol. Santiago LS 2003 Leaf traits of canopy trees on a precipitation
9 65–76 gradient in Panama: Integrating plant physiological ecology
Reich PB, Ellsworth DS, Walters MB, Vose JM, Gresham C, and ecosystem science, PhD dissertation, University of Florida
Volin JC and Bowman WD 1999 Generality of leaf trait Santiago LS, Kitajima K, Wright SJ and Mulkey SS 2004
relationships: a test across six biomes. Ecology 80 1955–1969 Coordinated changes in photosynthesis, water relations and leaf
nutritional traits of canopy trees along a precipitation gradient
in lowland tropical forest. Oecologia 139 495–502
Schulze ED and Mooney HA (eds) 1994 Biodiversity and
ecosystem function. Ecological studies, Vol 99 (Springer,
Berlin)
Schulze ED, Gebauer G, Ziegler H and Lange OL 1991 Estimates
of nitrogen fixation by trees on an aridity gradient. Oecologia
88 451–455
Schwinning S 2010 The ecohydrology of roots in rocks. Ecohydrology 3 238–45
Seghieri J, Vescovo A, Padel K, Soubie R, Arjounin M, Boulain
N, de Rosnay P, Galle S, Gosset M, Mouctar AH, Peugeot C Von Willert DJ, Eller BM, Werger MJ and Brinckmann E
and Timouk F 2009 Relationships between climate, soil 1990 Desert succunents and their life strategies. Vegetatio
moisture and phenology of the woody cover in two sites 90 133–143
located along the West African latitudinal gradient. J. Hydrol. Von Willert DJ, Eller BM, Werger MJA, Brinckmann E and
375 78–89 Ehlenfeldt HD 1992 Life strategies of succulents in deserts-
Semenova GV and van der Maarel E 2000 Plant functional types – with special reference to the Namib Desert (Cambridge:
a strategic perspective. J. Veg. Sci. 11 917–922 Cambridge University Press)
Singh JS and Singh VK 1992 Phenology of seasonally dry tropical Walker B, Kinzig A and Langridge J 1999 Plant attribute
forest. Curr. Sci. 63 684–689 diversity, resilience, and ecosystem function: The nature and
Singh L and Singh JS 1991 Storage and flux of nutrients in a dry significance of dominant and minor species. Ecosystems 2 95–
tropical forest in India. Ann. Bot. 68 275–284 113
Sobrado MA 1991 Cost-benefit relationships in deciduous and Walter H 1979 Vegetation of the earth and ecological systems of
evergreen leaves of tropical dry forest species. Funct. Ecol. the geo-biosphere (New York: Springer-Verlag)
5 608–616 Wardle DA, Barker GM, Bonner KI and Nicholson KS 1998 Can
Sperry JS 2003 Evolution of water transport and xylem structure. comparative approaches based on plant ecophysiological traits
Int. J. Plant. Sci. 164 S115-S127 predict the nature of biotic interactions and individual plant
Suding KN, Lavorel S, Chapin FS III, Cornelissen JHC, Díaz S, species effects in ecosystems? J. Ecol. 86 405–420
Garnier E, Goldberg D, Hooper DU, Jackson ST and Navas M- Weiher E, van der Werf A, Thompson K, Roderick M, Garnier E
L 2008 Scaling environmental change through the community- and Eriksson O 1999 Challenging Theophrastus: a common
level: a trait-based response-and-effect framework for plants. core list of plant traits for functional ecology. J. Veg. Sci. 10
Glob. Change Biol. 14 1125–1140 609–20
Suding KN, Miller AE, Bechtold H and Bowman WD 2006 Westoby M and Wright IJ 2006 Land-plant ecology on the basis of
The consequence of species loss on ecosystem nitrogen functional traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21 261–268
cycling depends on community compensation. Oecologia Westoby M 1998 A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy
149 141–149 scheme. Plant Soil 199 213–227
Swaine MD, Lieberman D and Putz FE 1987 The dynamics of tree Whigham DF, Zugasty Towle P, Cabrera Cano E, Neill JO and
populations in tropical forest: a review. J. Trop. Ecol. Ley E 1990 The effect of annual variation in precipitation on
3 359–366 growth and litter production in a tropical dry forest in the
Thompson K, Bakker J and Bekker RM 1997 The soil seed banks Yucatan of Mexico. Trop. Ecol. 31 23–34
of north west Europe: Methodology, density and longevity White F 1983 The Vegetation of Africa: A descriptive memoir to
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) accompany the Unesco/AETFAT/UNSO vegetation map of
Tosi Jr, JA and Voertman RF 1964 Some environmental factors in Africa (Natural Resources Research, 20. UNESCO, Paris)
the economic development of the tropics. Econo. Geograph. Wiemann MC and Williamson GB 1989 Wood Specific gravity
40 189–205 gradients in tropical dry and Montane rain forest trees. Am. J.
Turner J and Olson PR 1976 Nitrogen relations in a Douglas-fir Bot. 76 924–928
plantation. Ann. Bot. 40 1185–1193 Williams KF, Percival F, Merino J and Mooney HA 1987
Urbeita IR, Pérez-Ramos IM, Zavala MA, Marañón T and Kobe Estimation of tissue construction cost from heat of combustion
RK 2008 Soil water content and emergence time control and organic nitrogen content. Plant Cell Environ. 10 725–734
seedling establishment in three co-occurring Mediterranean Williams LE 1987 Growth of ‘Thompson Seedless’ grapevines: I.
Oak species. Can. J. For. Res. 38 2382–2393. Leaf area development and dry weight distribution. J. Am. Soc.
Vaieretti MV, Díaz S, Vile D and Garnier E 2007 Two Hort. Sci. 112 325–330
measurement methods of leaf dry matter content produce Wilson PJ, Thompson K and Hodgson JG 1999 Specific leaf area
similar results in a broad range of species. Ann. Bot. 99 955– and leaf dry matter content as alternative predictors of plant
958 strategies. New Phytol. 143 155–162
Vendramini F, Díaz S, Gurvich DE, Wilson PJ, Thompson K and Woodward FI 1987 Climate and plant distribution (Cambridge:
Hodgson JG 2002 Leaf traits as indicators of resource-use Cambridge University Press)
strategy in floras with succulent species. New Phytol. Wright IJ, Ackerly DD, Bongers F, Harms KE, Ibarra-Manríquez
154 147–157 G, Martínez-Ramos M, Mazer SJ, Muller-Landau HC, et al.
Villar R and Merino J 2001 Comparison of leaf construction costs 2007. Relationships among ecologically important dimensions
in woody species with differing leaf life-spans in contrasting of plant trait variation in seven Neotropical forests. Ann. Bot.
ecosystems. New Phytol. 151 213–126 99 1003–1015
Violle C, Navas M-L, Vile D, Kazakou E, Fortunel C, Hummel I Wright IJ, Pickup DSFM and Westoby M 2006 Cross-species
and Garnier E 2007 Let the concept of trait be functional! patterns in the coordination between leaf and stem traits, and
Oikos 116 882–892 their implications for plant hydraulics. Physiol. Plantarium
127 445 – 456
Wright IJ, Reich PB, Cornelissen JHC, Falster DS, Garnier E,
Hikosaka K, Lamont BB, Lee W, et al. 2004a Assessing the
generality of global leaf trait relationships. New Phytol. 166 485–
496
Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z,
Bongers F, Cavender-Bares J, Chapin FS, et al. 2004b The case study from a semiarid grassland in northern China.
world-wide leaf economics spectrum. Nature (London) 428 Oecologia 148 564–572
821–827 Zhang YJ, Meinzer FC, Hao GY, Scholz FG, Bucci SJ, Takahashi FS,
Yuan ZY, Li LH, Han LHXG, Chen SP, Wang ZW, Chen QS and Villalobos-Vega R, Giraldo JP, Cao KF, Hoffmann WA and
Bai WM 2006 Nitrogen response efficiency increased Goldstein G 2009 Size-dependent mortality in a Neotropical
monotonically with decreasing soil resource availability: a savanna tree: the role of height-related adjustments in hydraulic
architecture and carbon allocation. Plant Cell Environ. 32 1456–
1466

MS received 24 May 2010; accepted 26 September 2011

ePublication: 12 November 2011

Corresponding editor: R GEETA

You might also like