This cartoon shows a depiction of a child of "light" and a child of

the "dark".

The Children of Darkness Vs. The

Children of Light!
• Published on March 25, 2020

Ernesto "Jeshurum" Giro

1
I remember as a young teenager one of the scenes from the "black and
white" movie: Dracula starring Bela Lugosi who was obviously a Satanist like
most Hollywood actors and actresses TODAY! In this particular scene that I
kept so vivid in my mind, Dracula is welcoming his guest to his castle at
night and wolves are howling outside and he says: "Ah, the children of the
night what music they make!" As we all know this famous vampire classic
represents ALL the evil, wicked and malicious powers and the satanic ways

2
of those who are in the DARK! In other words, those who follow Satan the
devil. And in this article, we will examine what are the differences between
the children of LIGHT (that is God's people and servants) and the children
of DARKNESS (those who obey, follow and worship Satan) and obviously the
contrast should be as evident as DAY AND NIGHT!

In John chapter 12 verses 35-36 Jesus said something about this speaking
to His disciples notice: "Then Jesus said unto them, Yet a little while is the light with
you. Walk while ye have the light, lest darkness comes upon you: for him that walketh in
darkness knoweth not whither he goeth." So Jesus was speaking here in a spiritual
context and basically this is the point that He was trying to make to them.
You see He is the TRUE light of the world as we read in John 1 verses
4-9: "In him was life, and the life was the LIGHT of men. And the light shineth in darkness
(in this dark world); and the darkness comprehended it not." In other words, when we
as children of God walk around the world as representatives of Christ the
LIGHT, obeying God and keeping His commandments like He did and
observing God's Feasts and Holy Days and doing what's RIGHT in the eyes
of men, the children of Satan and of the DARK won't understand nor
comprehend why we do what we do). Now continuing in verse 6: "There was
a man sent from God, whose name was John." So here we see the FIRST Apostle
described and mentioned in the NEW TESTAMENT of the Scriptures. For he
is one who was "sent forth" from God! That is what the meaning of the
word Apostle is! And this was John the baptist. Verse 7: "The same came for a

3
witness, to bear witness of the light, that all men through him might believe. He was not that
Light but was sent to bear witness of that light. That was the TRUE light, which lighteth
every man that cometh into the world." So this is why Jesus said to His disciples
in John, 12:35: "Yet a little while is the light with you." He knew he had a short
time left with them before his crucifixion took place. And then He said: "Walk
while ye have the light, lest darkness comes upon you (so what did He mean by that?
Well, we know that He was the incarnate Word of God in the flesh but our
Bibles are also "the Word of God" and this is why every time we open the
Bible we are receiving Christ, for remember He is the Word of God!) So the
psalmist compared the Bible to a LIGHT! Let's notice this in Psalm, 119:
105: Thy word is a lamp unto my feet and a light unto my path." And if we are not
walking with Christ and according to His word: God's Word, then the
darkness of this world will take over our lives and will come upon us. It's
very PLAIN and SIMPLE my friends! This is why He said: "For him that
walketh in darkness knoweth not whither he goeth." In other words, the children of
the dark and Satan have NO CLUE, NO DIRECTION, NO IDEA of where
they are going or heading to by following Satan's wicked ways. And hence
they try to find people like "life Coaches" to direct and guide them. It's just
like the "blind leading the blind and they ALL fall into the ditch." This is
why in verse 36 of John chapter 12 Christ admonishes His disciples
this: "While ye have light, believe in the light (believe in my Word: THE BIBLE), that ye
may be the children of light."

So WHO ARE THE CHILDREN OF LIGHT? Well, John again

gives us the answer in 1 John, 1:5-10: "This then is the message which we have
heard of Him (JESUS), and declare unto you, that God is light, and in Him is no darkness at
all." Unlike
the "god of this world" (2 Cor, 4:4) who likes to be worshiped as
LUCIFER "the light bringer" and yet he is a very dark fallen angel. So God

4
is the TRUE light, not Lucifer! Verse 6: "IF we say that we have fellowship with
Him, and walk in darkness, we lie, and do not the TRUTH: But if we walk in the light, as He
is in the light, we have fellowship one with another, and the blood of Jesus Christ His Son
cleanseth us from ALL Sin. If we say that we have no sin (being carnal that is), we deceive
ourselves, and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive
us our sins, and to cleanse us from ALL unrighteousness. If we say that we have not sinned,
we make Him a liar, and His word is not in us." In
other words, His LIGHT IS NOT
IN US! This is why he wrote this in 1 John, 2:9-11: "He that saith he is the
light, and hateth his brother, is in darkness even until NOW! He that loveth his brother
abideth in the light, and there is none occasion of stumbling in him. But he that hateth his
brother is in darkness, and walketh in darkness, and knoweth not whither he goeth, because
the darkness (of this world) hath blinded his eyes." This
is just like in the case of my
half-brother Lazaro who "hates my guts" and Iknow he does because he
resents me being a Minister and he is under the sway of Satan the devil
and has been deceived by him like all the rest of the world (Rev., 12:9) So
now are we to LOVE ALL MANKIND? And just accept and LOVE EVERY
wicked person out there? CERTAINLY NOT! This is why John a bit farther
down in verses 15-17 of the same chapter writes: "Love not the world, neither
the things (customs, ideas, philosophies, ways, etc.) that are in the world. If any man loves
the world, the love of the Father is not in him. For ALL that is in the world, the lust of the
flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the PRIDE of life, is not of the Father but is of the world.
And the world passeth away (many are dying in this Corona Virus outbreak and
Pandemia), and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever (will have
ETERNAL LIFE)." Now notice what James says about this in James, 4:4: "Ye
adulterers and adulteress (James is addressing here Christians, not ungodly people but why
does he call them that? Well let's continue reading in order to get the answer to this
question), know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? Whosoever,
therefore, will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God." So
what we see here is
that if we are children of God and are TRUE Christians, there shouldn't be
any fellowship, gatherings, reunions or "close" friendships with people in the
world and we can't be "buddies" with those who are REALLY the devil's
children: "And you hath He quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins; Wherein in
time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the
power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience: Among whom
also we ALL had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires
of the flesh and of the mind; and were by nature the children of wrath (the wrath of God),
even as others." Ephesians,2:1-3. So we as TRUE people of God can no
longer participate nor "rub shoulders" with people in THIS WORLD! Because

5
that would be like committing "spiritual" adultery and "cheating" on our
husband Jesus Christ as a church. Notice what Paul said about this in 2
Corinthians, 6:14-18: "Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what
fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? And what communion hath light with
darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? Or what part hath he that believeth
with an infidel? And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? For ye are the
temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will
be their God, and they shall be my people. Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye
separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing (especially during this COVID-19
virus pandemic); and I will receive you, And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my
sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty."

Now with the "Corona Virus" running amok, the nations is not ONLY a
GOOD idea to stay away from "ungodly" people as Christians but to stay
close to those whom God will protect as promised in Psalm, 91: 3: "Surely
He shall deliver thee from the snare of the fowler, and from the noisesome pestilence
(COVID-19)." Now I want you to notice especially verses 5-6: "Thou shalt not be
afraid for the terror by NIGHT (What terror could this be? Well the next two verses gives us
the answer); nor for the arrow (stray bullet, missile, etc.) that flieth by day; Nor for the
pestilence (or virus) THAT WALKETH IN DARKNESS!" You
see God has revealed to
me that this virus is NOT diurnal but actually "NOCTURNAL" as evidenced
by those who have become infected and contagious during the nighttime
activitieslike "clubs, dinner events, parties, weddings, etc." hence most
countries are keeping a "nightly" curfew! And Jesus Christ predicted this
when He said in John, 9:4: "I must work the works of Him that sent me, while it is
DAY: the NIGHT cometh when NO man can work." Just think about it, the night is
when ALL the crimes and "BAD" things happen and take place! For
example, adulteries, burglaries, club crowds, crimes of ALL types, debauchery,
drug use, drunkenness, fights, rapes, violence, etc. occur mostly AT NIGHT!
During the day most people are working, studying, and staying home taking

6
care of their homes and other duties of the household. That is a FACT! The
night comes and then CHAOS and MAYHEM BEGINS! I want you to note
what are the clear differences between the children of LIGHT (GOD) and the
children of the DARK (the DEVIL):"Beloved, now we are the sons of God (in the
embryo), and it doth not yet appear what we shall be (once we are REALLY BORN AGAIN!):
but we know that, when He (Christ) shall appear, we shall be like Him; for we shall see Him
as He is. And every man that hath this hope in him purifieth himself, even as He is pure.
Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law (God's LAW): for sin is the
transgression of the law (the Ten Commandments). And ye know that He was manifested to
take away our sins, and in Him is no sin. Whosoever abideth in Him sinneth not: whosoever
sinneth (continually) hath not seen Him, neither known Him. Little children, let no man
deceive you: he that doeth righteousness is RIGHTEOUS, even as He is righteous. He that
committeth sin (continually) is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this
purpose, the Son of God was manifested, that He might destroy the works of the devil.
Whosoever is born (again) of God doth not commit sin; for His seed remaineth in Him: and
he cannot sin, because he is born of God." (1
John, 3:1-9) Now in verse 10 John
shows us the distinction between the DARK and the LIGHT: "In this the
children of God are manifest, and the children of the devil: whosoever doeth not
righteousness is NOT of God, neither he that loveth not his brother." Another
Scripture
that makes a very "effective" and eloquent comparison by the Apostle Paul is
found in Galatians, 5: "Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these;
Adultery, fornication, uncleanness (that's why they become infected with the virus),
lasciviousness, Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations (body piercings and
tattoos), wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and
such like: of which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that hey which do
such things shall not inherit the Kingdom of God." WHY? Well, it's obvious these are
the children of Satan, the children of disobedience, THE CHILDREN OF THE
DARK SIDE! In contrast he lists all the "attributes" and characteristics of the
children of LIGHT by describing the fruits of God's HOLY Spirit in them
notice this in verses 22-25:"But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering,
gentleness, goodness, faith, Meekness, temperance (or self-control): against such, there is
NO LAW! And they that are Christ's have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts. If
we live in the Spirit, let us also walk in the Spirit" So again we are to walk in the
LIGHT!

7
Jesus himself made a very nice comparison in the parable of the wheat and
the tares notice how He explained to His disciples the parable's meaning in
Matthew, 13: 36-43: "Then Jesus sent the multitude away, and went into the house: and
His disciples came unto Him, saying, Declare unto us the parable of the tares of the field. He
answered and said unto them, He that soweth the good seed is the Son of man; The field is
the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom (of God), but the tares are the
children of the wicked one; The enemy that sowed them is the devil; the harvest is the end of
the world, and the reapers are the angels (of God). As therefore the tares are gathered and
burnt in the fire (of the lake of fire); so shall it be at the end of this world. The son of man
shall send forth His angels, and they shall gather out of His kingdom ALL things that offend,
and them which do iniquity; And shall cast them into a furnace of fire (the lake of fire): there
shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth. Then shall the righteous shine forth (as ELOHIM, the
family of God) as the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Who hath ears to hear, let him
hear." In
Luke, 16: 8: Jesus made this comment in regards to the parable of
the Rich man notice: "And the lord commended the unjust steward because he had done

8
wisely: for the children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of
light." They ALL have college degrees, various titles and positions of authority
for sure! In fact, the GLOBAL ELITE is composed of a "mix bag" of corrupt
and "SUPER WEALTHY" "FILTHY RICH" individuals that are made up of
bankers, world leaders, celebrities, freemasons, occultists of all kinds, secret
societies like the Illuminati, the Skull & Bones, the Bilderberg Group, The
Bohemian Grove and powerful organizations like the Jesuits and the Vatican.
All these people I'm sure are very "highly educated" and in fact, many of
them like the Jesuits created our "educational system"! So YES I am
probably seen as an "idiot" by them and as someone who is
IGNORANT! "For you see your calling, brethren, how that not many wise men after the
flesh, not many mighty, not many noble (or from royal bloodlines), are called: But God hath
chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the (so-called) wise, and God hath chosen
the weak things (like me) of the world to confound the things which are mighty; And base
things of the world (like I AM), and things which are despised, hath God chosen, yea, and
things which are not (so highly respected), to bring to nought things that are: That no flesh
should glory in His presence." 1
Corinthians, 1: 26-29. In my book: The Plain And
Simple HIDDEN TRUTH of the Ages I show how there is a GOOD seed
and a BAD seed in the world which are the offspring of Satan the Devil
when he as the "two-legged" serpent seduced Eve in the garden and
impregnated her with the seed of Cain and from him come ALL the
"Reptilian" bloodlines in the world TODAY! This is why I urge you to get
your copy today at https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/the-plain-and-simple-
hidden-truth-of-the-ages-ernesto-giro/1128247384?ean=9781370609765

Eve had sex with the Serpent (Satan the devil) and betrayed Adam!

If we truly analyze the account in Genesis regarding the DECEPTION in the

Garden of Eden made by the Serpent to our first mother Eve, we can see a very
interesting and AMAZING “HIDDEN TRUTH” unfold right before our eyes! In an
article written by a prophet named Richard Zulu he writes: “Genesis 4:1 and 2
begins, “And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain and said, I
have gotten a man from the LORD. And she again bare his brother Abel...” Herein, we
see Eve's great deception at the birth of her first son. Still believing the Serpent's lie,
she actually thought Cain was the beginning of the creation of God, the Savior of
mankind. However God acknowledged no direct relationship with Cain and he is
from birth an outcast.

His name was to become synonymous with treachery and murder. The next
mention of Cain is on this verse: “But unto Cain and to his offering He had not
respect” (Genesis, 4:5). Not only was Cain's offering refused, but Cain was himself

9
forbidden an approach that his brother Abel enjoyed. Why was Cain rejected? Also in
relation to this what was the fruit Adam and Eve partook? What role did the serpent
play in the fall? What was the serpent seed of Genesis, 3:15?
The answer to this mysterious riddle has remained hidden for centuries. Under this
prophet's ministry, God has provided the solution:

“Now in the Garden of Eden there were two trees standing in the midst of it.
One was the Tree of Life, the other was the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.
Man was to live by the Tree of Life; but he was not to touch the other tree or he
would die. But man did partake of the other tree, and when he did, death entered
into him by his sin, and he became separated from God. Some have an idea that the
two trees in the garden were just two more trees like unto the rest of those that God
had placed there. But careful students know that this is not so. When John the
Baptist cried that the ax was laid to the root of all trees, he was not talking of simply
natural trees, but of spiritual principles. Now in 1 John 5:11 it says, “And this is the
RECORD, that God hath given to us eternal life, and this life is in His son.” Jesus said
in John, 5:40: “And ye will not come to Me, that ye might have life.” Thus the record,
God's Word, states plainly and clearly that LIFE, ETERNAL LIFE, is in the Son. It is no
other place. 1 John, 5:12: “He that hath the Son hath LIFE: and he that hath not the
Son of God hath NOT Life.” Now since the record cannot change, be taken from or
added thereunto, then the record stands that THE LIFE IS IN THE SON...Since this is
so. THE TREE IN THE GARDEN HAS TO BE JESUS.

Alright. If the tree of life is a person, then the Tree of the Knowledge of Good
and Evil is a person ALSO. It can't be otherwise. Thus the Righteous One and the
Wicked One stood side by side there in the midst of the Garden of Eden. Ezekiel
28:13 reads: “Thou (Satan) hast been in Eden, the garden of God.” Here is were we
receive the true revelation of the “serpent's seed.” Here is what really happened in
the Garden of Eden. The Word says that Eve was beguiled by the serpent. She was
actually seduced by the serpent. It says in Genesis, 3:1: “Now the serpent was more
subtle than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made.” This beast was so
close to a human being (and yet was pure animal) that he could reason and talk. He
was an upright creature and was somewhere in between a chimpanzee and a man
(hence Darwin's theory of Evolution), but closer to a man.

10
 Depicted how Satan might have shape-shifted into a Serpent-like man

He was so close to being a human that his seed could, and did mingle with that
of the woman and cause her to conceive. When this happened, God cursed the
serpent. He changed every bone in the serpent's body so that he had to crawl like a
snake. Science can try all it wants to, and it won't find the missing link. God saw to
that. Man is smart and he can see an association of man with animal and he tries to
prove it out of evolution. But man and animal did mingle. That's one of the
mysteries of God that has remained hidden, but here it is revealed. It happened right
back there in the midst of Eden when Eve turned away from Life to accept Death.

Notice that God said to them in the garden in Genesis, 3:15: “And I will put
enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed, and it
shall bruise thy head, and thou shall bruise his heel.” IF we give credit to the Word
that the woman did have a seed then the serpent must have surely had a seed also.
If the seed of the woman was a man-child apart from the man, then the seed of the
serpent will have to be in the same pattern, and that is, another male must be born
apart from human male instrumentality. There is no student who does not know the
seed of the woman was the Christ Who came by the instrumentality of God, apart
from human intercourse. It is also just as well known that the predicted bruising of
the serpent's head was in actuality a prophecy concerning what Christ would
accomplish against Satan at the cross. There at the cross, Christ would bruise the
head of Satan while Satan would bruise the heel of the Lord.
This portion of Scripture is the revelation of how the literal seed of the serpent
was sown in the earth, even as we have the account of Luke, 1:26-35, wherein is set
forth the exact account of how the seed of the woman came unto physical
manifestation apart from the instrumentality of the human male: “And in the sixth
month the angel Gabriel was sent from God unto a city of Galilee, named Nazareth,
to a virgin espoused to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David, and
the virgin's name was Mary. And the angel came in unto her, and said, 'Hail thou that
art highly favored, the Lord is with thee; blessed art thou among women.' And when
she saw him, she was troubled at his saying, and cast in her mind what manner of

11
salutation this could be. And the angel said unto her, 'Fear not, Mary; for thou hast
found favor with God. And, behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb and bring forth a
Son, and shalt call His Name Jesus. He shall be great and shall be called the Son of
the Highest; and the Lord God shall give unto Him the Throne of His father David: And
He shall reign over the house of Jacob for ever: and of His Kingdom there shall be no
end. Then said Mary unto the angel, 'How shall this be, seeing I know not a man?'
And the angel answered and said unto her, 'The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee,
and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee; therefore also That Holy Thing
Which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God.” As the seed of the
woman was literally God reproducing Himself in human flesh, so the seed of the
serpent is the literal way that Satan found he was able to open the door to himself
into the human race. It was impossible for Satan (for he is only a CREATED spirit-
being) to reproduce himself, so the Genesis account tells how he produced his seed
and introduced or injected himself into the human race. Also recall that Satan is
called the “serpent.” It is his seed or injection into the human race we are speaking
of.
Before Adam ever had carnal knowledge of Eve, the serpent had that knowledge
ahead of him. And that one born of it was Cain. Cain was of (born of, begotten of)
“that Wicked One” (1 John, 3:12). The Holy Spirit in John could not in one place call
Adam the “Wicked One” (for that is what he would be if he fathered Cain) and in
another place call Adam “Son of God” which he was by creation (Luke, 3:38). Cain
turned out in character like his father, a bringer of death, a murderer. His utter
defiance of God when faced by the Almighty in Genesis, 4:5, 13-14, show him to be
absolutely inhuman-like in characteristics, seeming even to surpass any account we
have in Scripture concerning a confrontation of Satan with God. “But unto Cain and
to his offering he had no respect. And Cain was very wroth, and his countenance fell.
And the Lord said unto Cain, 'Where is Abel thy brother?' And he said, 'I know not;
Am I my brother's keeper?' And Cain said unto the Lord, 'My punishment is greater
than I can bear. Behold, Thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth:
and from Thy face shall I be hid: and I shall be a fugitive and a vagabond in the earth;
and it shall come to pass, that everyone that findeth me shall slay me'.”

Notice the exact way the record of God sets forth the account of the births of
Cain, Abel and Seth. Genesis, 4:1, “And Adam knew Eve his wife, and she conceived,
and bare Cain, and said, 'I've gotten a man from the Lord.' And she again bare his
brother Abel.” Genesis, 4:25, “And Adam knew his wife again and she bare a son, and
called his name Seth...” There are THREE sons born from TWO acts of carnal
knowledge by Adam. Since the Bible is the exact and perfect Word of God, this is no
mistake but a record for our illumination. Since THREE sons were born from two acts
by Adam, you know POSITIVELY that ONE of those WAS NOT the son of Adam. God
has recorded this in the exact manner to show us something. The truth of the matter
is that Eve had in her womb TWO sons (twins from SEPARATE impregnations). She
was carrying twins, with Cain's conception sometime previous to that of Abel's.

TWINS again. Perfect type as always. To those that think that his is not possible,
let it be known that the medical records are replete with cases where women have
carried twins who were of separate ova and separate insemination with the

12
fertilization of the eggs being days apart, and NOT ONLY SO, but some of the records
show that the twins were fathered by separate males. Recently worldwide coverage
was given to a Norwegian mother who was suing her husband for support for
herself and her twins, one of which was white and the other black. She admitted that
she had a negro lover. The two conceptions were about three weeks apart. In
Beaumont, Texas, in 1963, the records again set forth a multiple birth wherein
pregnancies were many days apart, in fact so much so the woman almost died along
with one child in childbirth (Ibid p. 97-100). So as we have seen by Satan
impregnating the woman he in fact created in her the “BAD” seed of humankind that
we have known for centuries as the “reptilians” and the “draconians”, remember
that Satan the devil is described in Scripture in the form of a REPTILE which is the
form he took shape of after his fall from Heaven! This is why he is called “the GREAT
dragon” and “that old serpent” in the Bible (notice Revelation, 12: 9). And because
he always wanted to immitate and mimmick God and to “interrupt”, distort and
interfere in God's perfect human DNA “for God created humanity from ONE
BLOOD!” (Acts, 17:26). However Satan has tried to mingle in with God's seed: the
human race ever since and his fallen angels as well. Notice that Genesis 6 verse 2
says: “That the sons of God (by creation) saw the daughters of men that they were
fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.” The fallen angels committed
this GREAT sin for they were forbidden to marry or to give themselves in marriage
(Matthew, 22: 30). This is why Jude wrote about this in Jude verse 6: “And the angels
which kept not their first state (or shape), but left their own habitation (in the spirit
realm and dimension to go after the women of the earth), He hath reserved in
everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the GREAT DAY!”Back in
Genesis 6 we can see the result of such an “unholy union” notice verse 4: “There
were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that (the NEPHILIM, I'll talk
more about these later), when the sons of God (the fallen angels) came in unto (had
sex with) the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became
mighty men which were of old, men of renown.” So who were these “NEPHILIM”
here described in the pages of the Bible? They simply were the offspring of the fallen
angels with the women of the earth who became GIANTS! As we read in the Bible:
“The Lord said to Moses, "Send men to spy out the land of Canaan, which I am giving to
the Israelites" ... So they went up and spied out the land ... And they told him: "... Yet the
people who live in the land are strong, and the towns are fortified and very large; and
besides, we saw the descendants of Anak there." ... So they brought to the Israelites an
unfavorable report of the land that they had spied out, saying, "The land that we have
gone through as spies is a land that devours its inhabitants; and all the people that we
saw in it are of great size. There we saw the Nephilim (the Anakites come from the
Nephilim); and to ourselves we seemed like grasshoppers, and so we seemed to them."
Numbers 13:1–2; 21; 27–28; 32–33. (New Revised Standard Version). These giants
have mostly been killed and destroyed as we have seen in many fables, folklore and
legends of the world like CONAN: THE BARBARIAN for example and the Greek
mythologies. They are also mentioned in the Bible as the “the mighty that are fallen
of the uncircumcised, which are gone down to the hell (the bottomless pit) with their
weapons of war: and they have laid their swords under their heads, but their
iniquities shall be upon their bones, though they were the terror of the mighty in the
land of the living.” Ezekiel, 32:27.

13
 Depiction of the giant “Crom” from the movie: CONAN!

According to Wikipedia's Main article: Giants (Greek mythology)

Most of the contemporary English translations of Genesis 6:1–4 and Numbers 13:33
render the Heb. Nefilim as "giants". This tendency in turn stems from the fact that one of
the earliest translation of the Hebrew Bible, the Septuagint, composed in III/II century
BCE, renders the said word as gigantes. The choice made by the Greek translators has
been later adopted into the Latin translation, the Vulgate, compiled in IV/V century CE,
which uses the transcription of the Greek term rather than the literal translation of the
Heb. nefilim. From there, the tradition of the giant progeny of the sons of God and the
daughters of men spread to later medieval translations of the Bible.[20]
The decision of the Greek translators to render the Heb. Nefilim as Gr. Gigantes is a
separate matter. The Heb. Nefilim means literally "the fallen ones" and the strict
translation into Greek would be peptokotes, which in fact appears in the Septuagint of
Ezekiel 32:22–27. It seems then that the authors of Septuagint wished not only to simply
translate the foreign term into Greek, but also to employ a term which would be
intelligible and meaningful for their Hellenistic audiences. Given the complex meaning of
the nefilim which emerged from the three interconnected biblical passages (human-divine
hybrids in Genesis 6, autochthonous people in Numbers 13 and ancient warriors trapped
in the underworld in Ezekiel 32), the Greek translators recognized some similarities. First
and foremost, both nefilim and gigantes were liminal figures resulting from the union of
the opposite orders and as such retained the unclear status between the human and
divine. Similarly dim was their moral designation and the sources witnessed to both awe
and fascination with which these figures must have been looked upon. Secondly, both

14
were presented as impersonating chaotic qualities and posing some serious danger to
gods and humans. They appeared either in the prehistoric or early historical context, but
in both cases they preceded the ordering of the cosmos. Lastly, both gigantes and nefilim
were clearly connected with underworld and were said to have originated from earth and
as well end up closed therein.[20]

In1 Enoch, they were "great giants, whose height was three thousand ells". An Ell being 18
inches, this would make them 4500 feet (nearly a mile) tall.

A graveyard of “GIANTS” was found in China by the Smithsonian

The Phillistine remains of “Goliath” the Giant killed by David

15
 I have included here in my book the following article by Creation Today that
speaks more in detail about the “origins” and gives a FULL explanation on this
fascinating subject of the giants of the Bible known as the “NEPHILIM” which I feel
will offer the reader a better clarification and UNDERSTANDING on this subject.

The Nephilim and the Sons of God — An Introduction

Genesis 6 includes a passage that has become one of the most confusing in the entire
Bible, although this wasn’t always the case.

“And it came about, when mankind began to multiply on the face of the earth, and
daughters were born to them, that the sons of God saw the daughters of men, that they
were beautiful. And they took for themselves wives from any they chose. And Yahweh
said, “My spirit will not remain with man indefinitely, in that he is flesh; his days will
be one hundred twenty years.” The Nephilim were on the earth in those days—and
also afterward—whenever the sons of God went in to the daughters of men, who bore
to them children. They were the mighty men of antiquity, men of renown.” (Genesis
6:1–4)

These four verses have spawned scores of questions. Who were the sons of God?
Were they fallen angels? Kings? Judges? Men descended from Seth? Who were the
daughters of men? What’s the deal with the 120 years that God mentioned? And what
about the Nephilim—what does the word mean? Were they giants? If so, how tall
were they? Were they the offspring of the sons of God and women? How could they
have been on the earth before and after the Flood? This sampling of questions reveals
how puzzling this passage has been for many people.

Bible commentaries offer a variety of answers to many of these questions and often
gloss over others. Contributing to the confusion are hundreds of websites and articles
filled with misinformation on every one of the questions above. Many self-proclaimed
experts rely on these wrong ideas and unwittingly mislead their followers. Add the
fringe ideas of conspiracy theorists to the mix and we are left with a muddled mess.

16
What are we to make of this situation? Many choose to neglect these verses because
they are just too controversial or too difficult to understand, but for Bible-believing
Christians this approach is inadequate. The Holy Spirit made sure these verses were
recorded for us, so we should do our best to understand them in a way that makes
sense of the terminology and context, and our conclusions must not contradict other
passages of Scripture. This article is the first in a series dedicated to that goal. In this
introduction, we will cover a few basics and plot our course for the upcoming articles.

Who were the sons of God?

Three major views have been promoted by Christians to identify the sons of God (in
Hebrew bene ha’elohim). Unfortunately, some believers get quite upset during this
discussion, so we encourage you to remember that this topic is not a salvation issue.
Godly men and women have disagreed over the correct interpretation of the passage
for centuries. There is no need for Christians to condemn each other if they happen to
reach different conclusions on these verses.

The Sethite View, which dominated most of church history, sees the sons of God as
men from the line of Seth (mentioned in Genesis 5) who married women from the
line of Cain (mentioned in Genesis 4). Yet, as far as we know, the Sethite View is
actually the last of the three to be developed.

The Royalty View argues that the sons of God were nobles or highly respected
judges who thought of themselves as divine or were considered to be divine by their
subjects. These nobles took common women and forced them to join their harems.
The Royalty View was developed among rabbis in the late first or early second
century AD.

The Fallen Angel View, the earliest known position among both Jewish and
Christian writers, maintains that the sons of God are heavenly beings that left heaven
and sired children with women. This is based on the fact that in the other Old

17
Testament passages where bene ha’elohim is found, it refers to heavenly beings. This
view dominated Jewish writings on the topic until the early second century AD and
Christian writings until the fifth century AD.

Before moving on, it is important to briefly address the most popular objection to the
Fallen Angel View. Many people claim that Jesus ruled out such a possibility in
Matthew 22:30 when He stated that in the resurrection, believers will not marry nor
be given in marriage and they will be “like angels in heaven.” Thus, these people
conclude that angels cannot marry. If this is what Jesus said, then we would agree that
the fallen angel view cannot be correct. But this is not what the verse says. Jesus
specifically stated that the angels in heaven do not marry. He was speaking of godly
angels in heaven and what they do not do. He did not address what rebellious angels
can do on earth.

Who were the Nephilim?

The first thing to notice is that although many readers conflate the two groups, the
Nephilim were not the same entities as the sons of God. However, one’s view on the
identity of the sons of God usually guides their understanding of the Nephilim.
Depending on how the beginning of verse 4 is translated, the Nephilim were either the
offspring of the unions described in the passage, or they were already on the earth
when those marriages took place.

The King James Bible translates the Hebrew word (nephilim) as “giants.” Verse 4
states, “There were giants in the earth in those days…” This same term also appears
twice in Numbers 13:33, which records the Israelite spies’ report when they returned
from investigating the Promised Land, the land of Canaan. The 12 spies described

18
very tall people in the land and depicted themselves as grasshoppers compared to
these giants.

Many Bible translations simply transliterate the term so that verse 4 begins with
something like, “The Nephilim were on the earth…” This reflects the debate over the
meaning of this word. Many people claim that the word is related to the Hebrew verb
naphal (“to fall”). Thus, they see the Nephilim as “fallen ones,” so from this
perspective, they were either warriors who “fell upon” their enemies or extremely
wicked people who had fallen far from God, morally speaking.

The Nephilim and the Sons of God – Part Two

The Sethite View

In Part One on this topic, The Nephilim and the Sons of God – An Introduction, we
introduced the three most common views on the identity of the sons of God: the
Sethite View, the Royalty View, and the Fallen Angel View. Looking at the
Nephilim, we presented the two main views about the Nephilim. In this article, we
take a closer look at the Sethite View. Here are the first two verses of our passage in
Genesis 6.

“And it came about, when mankind began to multiply on the face of the earth, and
daughters were born to them, that the sons of God saw the daughters of men, that they
were beautiful. And they took for themselves wives from any they chose.”

Positive Arguments for the Sethite View

This Sethite position claims that “the sons of God” were godly men from the line of
Seth (Genesis 5), and “the daughters of men” were ungodly women from the line of
Cain (Genesis 4:16–24). Sethite supporters generally see an overarching theme in
Genesis 4–5 of believers being contrasted with unbelievers. As mentioned in the
introductory article, this position was by far the most common interpretation from the

19
5th century through early 20th century. Proponents of this position also point out the
fact that believers are sometimes called “sons of God” in the New Testament.

Surprisingly, these are essentially the only positive arguments raised in support of the
Sethite View. The other arguments are basically claims against the presumed
impossibility or perceived absurdity of the Fallen Angel View. But an argument
against the Fallen Angel View should not be deemed as evidence for the Sethite
position since there is another alternative—the Royalty View.

The Royalty View

In this third article, we provide an overview of the second major view, which has been
called the Dynastic Rulers or the Royalty View. Those espousing this position claim
that the sons of God were kings or other nobles who considered themselves as divine
or were regarded as divine by their subjects. These tyrants forced women (“the
daughters of men”) to join their harems. Thus, their major sin was polygamy.

Within this view, the Nephilim are usually believed to be the offspring of these
unions, so they were princes or sons of other powerful men. As such, they could
rightly be called mighty men and men of renown. However, this does not account for
the Nephilim being described as giants, and those holding this opinion do not usually
consider them to have been giants.

This position has been the least common of the three throughout church history,
although it has grown in popularity over the past few decades as the Sethite view
seems to have faded a bit. A few of the arguments given by supporters are based
on proposed similarities between the first eleven chapters of Genesis and ancient
Near Eastern cultures. For example, one of this position’s best-known defenders,
Meredith Kline, pointed to the famous Sumerian King List and claimed that the
kings in that list were considered divine. Because this list has some similarities to
the genealogy in Genesis 5, Kline asserted that the Genesis 5 list must also be

20
 about kings who were considered divine. With this genealogy leading right up to
Genesis 6, it wouldn’t be a stretch to think that verses 1–4 also refer to royalty.

Perhaps the two most common Royalty View arguments center on two potential clues
from within the Bible. First, Nimrod is called a gibbor (“mighty one” or “mighty
man”), the singular form of the term used to describe the Nephilim in Genesis 6:4
(gibborim– “mighty men”). We know that Nimrod was also a ruler (Genesis 10:10–
12), so there is a connection in Genesis 10 between a king and the term for “mighty
one.”

Second, the term for sons of God in Genesis 6:2 and 4 is bene ha’elohim. Some
Bibles have occasionally translated the term ’elohim as judges in Exodus 21:6 and
22:8–9 (NKJV). So if ’elohim can rightly be translated as rulers or judges, then the
sons of these individuals would likely become rulers as well.

Problems with the Royalty View

These arguments may seem compelling at first glance, but things are not always what
they appear. The assertion that ancient Near Eastern kings pronounced themselves as
divine is not as solid as many claim. The ancient Mesopotamians believed that the
concept of kingship came from heaven, but they did not, for the most part, view their
kings as divine.

21
Second, it is true that Nimrod is called a gibbor (“mighty one”) but so were many
of David’s fighting men along with thousands of soldiers in Israel’s army
centuries later. The Nephilim were indeed mighty men, but not all mighty men
were Nephilim. Thus, it doesn’t necessarily follow that Nimrod can be linked with
the sons of God. He may have simply been a mighty warrior who became a ruler.
Incidentally, the Greek translation of the Old Testament, known as the Septuagint,
describes Nimrod with the term gigas(“giant”) in place of gibbor in Genesis 10:8.
So maybe he was a giant and was connected to the sons of God, but this would
not prove the Royalty View, since it would also fit nicely with the Fallen Angel
View.

Third, the Royalty View depends upon a highly improbable translation of ’elohim
as “rulers” or “judges.” In the verses cited above (Exodus 21:6 and 22:8–9,
Psalm 82:1), many Bibles translate the term as “God” or “gods,” which is
consistent with how it is used in nearly every other place. In fact, a very strong
case can be made that ’elohimshould never be understood as referring to human
beings prior to death. This is why Douglas Stuart, in the New American

22
 Commentary of Exodus stated, “The idea that ʾelohim could mean ‘judges’ or
‘leaders’ at even a single place in the OT has always been conjectural and, in our
opinion, unconvincing.” Instead, the term always refers to an entity from the
spiritual realm (e.g., God, gods, angels, demons, and the departed spirit of a
human being).

This final problem with the Royalty View we cite here is quite devastating to its
premise. The context of Psalm 82:1 demonstrates that ’elohim cannot be referring to
human rulers or judges. Here, God had taken His stand in the divine council, and He
pronounced judgment on the gods. The remainder of the psalm and Jesus’ citation of
it in John 10 demonstrates that these “gods” were heavenly beings who were being
judged for their failure to carry out God’s orders. If ’elohim cannot legitimately be
understood as referring to human rulers or judges, then the Royalty View loses its best
argument and has no plausible interpretation of Genesis 6.

Fallen angels Who are They?

According to Wikipedia: “All early sources refer to the "sons of heaven" as angels.
From the third century BCE onwards, references are found in the Enochic literature,
the Dead Sea Scrolls (the Genesis Apocryphon, the Damascus Document, 4Q180),
Jubilees, the Testament of Reuben, 2 Baruch, Josephus, and the book of Jude
(compare with 2 Peter 2). For example: 1 Enoch 7:2 "And when the angels, (3) the
sons of heaven, beheld them, they became enamoured of them, saying to each other,
Come, let us select for ourselves wives from the progeny of men, and let us beget
children." Some Christian apologists, such as Tertullian and especially Lactantius,
shared this opinion.

The earliest statement in a secondary commentary explicitly interpreting this to mean that
angelic beings mated with humans can be traced to the rabbinical Targum Pseudo-
Jonathan and it has since become especially commonplace in modern Christian
commentaries. This line of interpretation finds additional support in the text of Genesis
6:4, which juxtaposes the sons of God (male gender, divine nature) with the daughters of
men (female gender, human nature). From this parallelism it could be inferred that the
sons of God are understood as some superhuman beings.[21]

23
The New American Bible commentary draws a parallel to the Epistle of Jude and the
statements set forth in Genesis, suggesting that the Epistle refers implicitly to the
paternity of Nephilim as heavenly beings who came to earth and had sexual intercourse
with women.[22] The footnotes of the Jerusalem Bible suggest that the biblical author
intended the Nephilim to be an "anecdote of a superhuman race".[23]
Some Christian commentators have argued against this view, citing Jesus's statement
that angels do not marry.[24] Others believe that Jesus was only referring to angels in
heaven.[25]

The Bottom Line:

24
The “fallen angels” are simply demons and malignant spirits who are part of that
ONE third of the stars of heaven that Satan the devil drew with him to the earth
(Revelation, 12: 4). And like Satan himself they have mated and do mate from now
and then with earthly human women and this is known in Occult circles as
“INCUBUS/SUCUBUS”. I've personally have met women including my wife who
have told me about spiritual entities trying to have sex with them at night! So again
what about the “reptilian” and “draconian” seed of Satan what else can we learn about
them? According to Wikipedia: “Reptilians have become one of the most captivating
alien races in our galaxy. This race of Reptilian alien beings originate from the Draco
constellation and now find themselves throughout the entire galaxy. Reptilians are also
known as Lizard People, Reptoids, and Reptilian Aliens and are claimed to be working
along with the American government, or that the Government itself is filled with lizards, to
control and manipulate our home planet. The reason many people associate these
Reptilians with such actions is because of their inherent nature to be evil.”

Illustration of a typical reptilian being or demon

The idea of reptilians on Earth was popularized by David Icke, a conspiracy theorist
who claims that the world is actually secretly controlled by evil shape-shifting lizard
people from the 4th dimension. Genuinely. David Icke is a proponent of a super-duper grand
unified conspiracy theory that mixes together just about every conspiracy theory you can think
of; this he calls the "Babylonian Brotherhood", where Jew lizards were. All members of the
media, the scientific community, the banking system, and the religions and militarily of the
world's nations trying to bring Global Elite and rule the world. Another claim of David Icke is that
5–12 feet tall, blood-drinking, shape-shifting reptilian humanoids from the Alpha Draconis star
system, now hiding in underground bases, are trying to take over the world. He contends that
most of the world's leaders are related to these reptilians, including George W. Bush of the
United States, and Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom.

25
In this picture you can clearly notice the “shape-shifting” of the Queen in her eyes
Michael Barkun posits that the idea of a reptilian conspiracy originated in the fiction of
Conan the Barbarian creator Robert E. Howard. The first appearance of "serpent men" in
literature was in Howard's story, "The Shadow Kingdom", published in Weird Tales in
August 1929. This story drew on Theosophical ideas of the "lost worlds" of Atlantis and
Lemuria, particularly Helena Blavatsky'sThe Secret Doctrine, with its reference to
"'dragon-men' who once had a mighty civilization on a Lemurian continent. Though the
notion of intelligent Reptilians manipulating humanity and genetically engineering the
creation of humans seems far-fetched, ridiculous and the stuff of sci-fi, the origins of the
Draconian Reptilians allegedly date back millions of years ago to a planet near the Draco
Constellation, where they had the right to conquer and destroy anything that got in the
way of their evolutionary progression. When David Icke conspiracy theories came to
public eyes, the idea of a reptilian agenda exploded into people's minds by claiming Jew
Lizards and reptilian world leaders are trying to take over the world.

26
 “shape-shifting” reptile from the 1982 movie: “CONAN: The Barbarian”

The fact of the matter is that “shape-shifting” Draconian reptilians are REAL! This is
no longer a “conspiracy theory” and the Bible attests to it as I've have shown
already. The “BAD” seed of Cain has been reproducing on the earth as the “Royal
Draconian” Bloodlines of the Illuminati and others around the world! One such
individual was the legendary “Vlad Dracula” the Romanian Prince known historically
as “Vlad the Impaler”!

27
 “Vlad Dracula” the Romanian Reptilian Prince known also as “The Impaler”

Let’s start from the basics: the world like you know it today is in fact ran by
reptilian-humanoids. These individuals are NOT extraterrestrials hailing from the star
Alpha Draconis in the Draco constellation. They come from ancient times and have
been living on earth, slowly infiltrating human society. On the contrary of humans
who mostly act according to their emotions, Reptilians are very logical, calculated
and hierarchical beings. Chances that you might have crossed paths with one of
these beings are slim, as most of them evolve in high circles of society. The majority
of Reptilians operate with little freedom and great structure and control are dictated
to them by their masters at the top higher bloodlines such as the Rothschilds,
Rockefellers and other similar European royal and aristocratic families as well as the
establishment families of the Eastern United States. The Queen of England is also a
top ranked reptilian. It has actually been proven that all members of the royal family
are actually nothing but lizards with crowns! And so are old mate Trump, the Bush
family, John Kerry, Rihanna, Katy Perry… you name it. And even if it’s most likely that
you have never seen them in real life, you would have been completely fooled by
their camouflage capabilities if you did. And their ability to “shape-shift” is very
REAL! See, Reptilians have total control over THE MATRIX, and can modify the
perception of any other being. We, as humans are decoding wave-forms sent by
other humans and our environment, and the way we receive this information makes
up for what our brain end up decoding, and what we end up seeing. But lizards can
shift this hybrid field, enabling them to hide their vicious appearance (as most of
them are around 7 foot high!) behind a normal human form. And that’s where things
get quite interesting. In many a YouTube video we've been able to observe and
capture some of these rare shape-shifting phenomenons. Rumors have been
circulating that Kolohe might have officially splitting from long-time sponsor Target
to tame public rumors about his link with the stock market, reptilian owned
company, but be assured that he isn’t the only surfer on the world tour reporting the
the mother-head… the highest placed Draco-officer might has in fact been hanging
out in front of our eyes, in most of your computerized devices for more than 25
years now.

28
We’re talking about no one else than the one and only Jimmy Slade — Kelly Robert
Slater.

Slater has recently been struggling to hide the doubts on his activities with the grand
masters at the top, covering his involvement with reptilian investors with his brand
“Outer-known” and diverting the masses from his underground Texas Reptilian Base
with a “revolutionary Surf Ranch”, and even hosting a contest there, and doing a
great job at distracting media from his nasty research activities happening a few feet
below the peeling right-hander.
The flesh-eating, shape-shifting reptilian humanoids at the top of it all have only one
goal in mind: enslave the human race. And what a better occasion to do so than
“Black Friday week” an event massively disguised as an opportunity for modest
households to afford what they usually can’t! Whether it is encouraging us to fight
over a 24-pack of toilet roll at our local Walmart, stealing that random guy’s “the
search” discount card he’s left on the bonnet of his car or bite our best friend in the
arm in order to reach that last 32-sized High-Line trunk from your local Board-rider
store, the end goal is the same create anger materializing itself in consumerism and
eventually increasing reptilian profits!

Image of “reptilian eyes” of President George Bush Son

29
 Medieval depiction of the reptilian Jungian Genealogy

Medieval painting showing a snake or serpent with a woman's head

30
31