Carnivores Book
Carnivores Book
Carnivores Book
Acharya Agnivrat
Nasik
consent
Publishing house
Rolls in Introduction
You published it
'A gentle man 's diet can also be eggs and beef. You
don't realize that meat and blood is man's first meal.
He is born by flesh or blood in her mother's womb.
Analysis-Despite the help of research, you became
immersed in stupidity and managed to fool even the
re-enlightened. This is wonderful because the infant
receives all of the nutrients in the womb of the
mother from the milk of the mother, but it is
completely incorrect to use meat. The food the
mother provides in the form of juice leads to the
blood production of the child. I wonder if it's the most
natural thing to drink the blood of your mother and
consume beef, would you think? There is a non-
vegetarian supporter in the world , especially anyone
who features false sophists like yourself who can
destroy their mother and consume her. During the
point, I suggest that the child's placenta and not the
mouth collect the mother's blood. The infant then
behaves as part of the mother. Just as the food in our
body, the liver, the belly, the duodenum and the
intestines, along with the blood, feed all our organs,
the fetus, in the same way the body of the mother
feeds. This cycle takes place not just in human beings,
but in all things. And donkey, dog, horse, pig, bear,
rabbit are going to tell us to consume meat? Your
primary diet was always the mother's flesh and blood
in your eyes. You appear to try to mislead others with
biochemical stupidity. I challenge you if you want to
sophisticate yourself, will you do it?
Your argument is —
‘History has proven that man uses meat as fuel.
People used to eat meat in India during the Vedic
period. The hunting of animals by the command of the
arrow was prevalent. This is illustrated by the
portrayal of Tulsidasji, which encourages
Ramachandraji to chase deer and to go out to kill elk.
Subsequently, King Dasaratha launched the arrows at
Shravanakumar though mistakenly in the
disillusionment of Deer, sourcing was unquestionably
real & authentic.
That is, even if you are decent sort and this is all about
you & your choices, but even after you are
affectionately virtuous I tell you things of concernSo it
is evident that, given no addiction listed above in Shri
Ram, the obligation to predicate as a parent was
stated to be. If you prove the argument of hunting by
taking refuge from Shravanacumar 's past, you first
inquire for Shravan to be killed in deer deception, it
becomes obvious that you haven't read both
Ramayana and Ramcharitmana, then Deer is not
named in lieu of elephants. In Ramcharitmana, this
tale is just descriptive, and in Ramayana, Valmiki is
comprehensive. The term 'VyayamaSankalpa' is given
to Dasarathaji. He appeared not to go for meat, but to
exercise or to bend down to the banks of the Saryu
River for archery. You wrote-
‘वजगयेन्ध्
ु ांिं च’ (्न.ु 6.14)
अथागि ् ्धु = It is prohibited to use alcoholic
substances and meat.
िाः रोरुवि ् वष
ृ भाः तिग््शङ्
ृ गाः वष्र््न ् िस्थौ वरर्न ्
आ पचृ थव्यााः।
ववश्वेषु एनं वज
ृ नेषु पास् याः ्े कुक्षी िि
ु िो्ाः
पण
ृ ाति।।
(ऋग्वेि 10.28.2)
Indra, which also means the king and soul, is the god
of second mantra. It can also be interpreted
scientifically in my aesthetic. The first appeal about
the Atharvaveda 's sources is that an essay copied
renders a joke. The Atharvaveda you have not seen
even, then there are no mantras in the
aforementioned addresses with the interpretation of
those expression. The first slogan address will be
(7.6.37), modified to (7.637). Consider this also to be
an imprint defect, but in Atharva Veda Kand 7, Sukta
6 there are only four mantras and from what came 37,
40-42 mantras you quoted. Your prose is unfair and
deceptive. Someone will read the book first and then
after which publish it. Writing by copying is fraud and
stolen plagiarism, if incorrect, what would be said?
This is the state of affairs. Those mantras are not
visible to anyone in the world. I assume you would
seek to exploit more scriptures after reading my
offensive attempt or try to locate something else in
Atharvavaveda. Let me save your hard work and tell
me where can you put these bogus significances? In
the following posts you will get some ambiguity.
My Aadhidevic transcription
एिि ् वा स्वािीयाः)
(Hereby Tasteful:) These guests ie continuous gantry
pran, vyana vibrations and hospitality ie controlling
sutra vamani vibrations are flavoursome ie helping to
generate different substances by making mithras of
different chandishadis. (Yat) which is based on the
subtle speech (pramavya and sutram vayu rashmiyan
(the superabundant and weak or flesh), ie 'Om' Chand
Rashmi, as well as its Purish = complete connective
force {Purisham = Purnam Balam (M.D. Yabha 12.46),
Aandrihi Purisham (Sh. 8.7.3.7), Annam Purisham (Sh.
8.1.4.5) {Purisham = Purnam Balam (M.D. Yabha
12.46), Aandrihi Purisham (Sh. 8.7.3.7), Annam
Purisham (Sh. 8.1.4.5) } continuously flowing through
materials such as Nana Rashmi or atoms etc. The root
of these vibrations of 'Om' is called mansatva, with
alkalinity and absolute viability. The word "flesh" here
indicates that these signs "Om" are nearest to the
mind and that the mind is the biggest inhabited form.
The Om waves continue to fall into the vital matter
and other large substances which sprout over the
clouds of vedic air. (िि ् एव न अश्नीयाि ्) For this
reason, there is no destruction of the process of
formation of various Rashmi or atomic substances etc.
This framework does not destroy the process of
making guest life for mithras before it becomes inert,
but after it becomes inactive, & after the combination
of two particles and the mithun process can be
destroyed or stopped, it should be known.
The effect on creation of this Sacred Text-
Seer’s and Divine Influence-It is suggested by its wise
Brahma that it originates from the Jupiter of the
consciousness and the 'Om.' This Gemini tends to
motivate Chand Rashmi constantly and strongly. Due
to its divine influence, life, spirits and vedic-air
Vibrations(prana) are particularly active and
supplemented by many Radio-active & atomic
orders.
प्रस्थं कु्ाररका्ांि् ्।
वष
ृ भ-ऋषभकनि सिंिी-कटे ली, वािा िज्स्ि-िज्स्िकनि
श्वान-कुिाघाि, ग्रज्नथपणग खर-खरपणणगनी वपा-णिल्ली=
बक्कल के भीिर का जाला
्ाजागर-त्रबल्लीघाि, चचिा काक-काक्ाची अज्स्थ-गुठली
्यरू -्यरू सशखा वाराि-वारािीकनि ्ांि- गि
ू ा,
जटां्ािी
बीछू-बीछूबूटी ्दिष-्दिषाक्ष, गुग्गुल च्ग-बक्कल
िपग-िवपगणीबूटी श्येन-श्येनघंटी (िनिी) स्नायु-रे शा
अश्व-अश्वगनधा, अज्ोिा ्ेष-जीवशाक नख-नखबट
ू ी
नकुल-नाकुलीबूटी कुक्कुट (टी) शाल््लीवक्ष
ृ ्ेि-्ेिा
िंि-िं िपिी नर-िौगज्नधक िण
ृ लो्(शा)- जटा्ािी
्त्स्य-्त्स्याक्षी ्ािल
ु - घ्रा हृि-िारचीनी
्ष
ू क-्ष
ू ाकणी ्ग
ृ -िििे वी, इनिायण, जटा्ािी, कपरू
पेशी-जटा्ािी
गो-गौलो्ी पशु-अम्बाड़ा, ्ोथा रुचधर-केिर
्िाज-बड़ी अजवायन कु्ारी-घीकु्ार आलम्भन-स्पशग
My metaphysical comment
The Aryan Veda is, in our view, the ultimate and pure
proof, in many books, of the Brahmin, Manusmriti,
Buddhism, Upanishad's, Ramayana,
Rigvedadibhasibhumica and Satyarth Prakash
scriptures, etc. We replied to your claims of violence
in the Veda and now such documentation does not
matter to us. We firmly suspect that many scholars
confused the languages of the Veda Samhita,
although there is some form of misinterpretation and
scanning in certain genuine texts. Also while removing
the evil & darkness, some occurrences of non-
vegetarian followers, remain unsubstantiated to fight
against the Vedas, Maharishi Dayanand Saraswati and
his disciples Arya scholars have made their adventure
to completely eliminate them. We consider the 18
Puranas to be contentious & groundless that we can
not and should not advocate. These texts are the
medieval scholars' works. Also, no Purana is a unique
& distinctive person's creation. Manipulations from
time to time were carried out, and Lord Ved Vyas was
cunningly experimented and demonstrated to be
crafter of these Puranas. The Hindus are misguided
in holding these Illegitimate Scriptures as facts
(although other materials are really highly valued and
authentic), and sticking them to their chest. Now look
at the Brahmin text for meat products.
‘यिा वपष्टानयथ लो्ातन भवज्नि। यिाप आनयति अथ
त्वग्भवति। यिा ि यौत्यथ्ांिं भवति।’
The grain is called loam, the surface of the wheat,
combined with water, the dough is the cognizer for
beef. (Excerpt from the Vedic sampattis. P. 527)
बीजैयज्ञ
ग ेशु यष्टव्यस्ति वै वैदिकी श्रुतिाः।
अज िंज्ञातन बीजातन च्छाग नो िनि्
ु िगथ।
नैश ध्गाः ििां िे वा यत्र वध्येि वै पशुाः।। (शा. प.
337.4,5)
In other terms, Yajna should be rendered with seeds,
this is the tradition of the Vedic people. The seeds
have a marker. The slaughter of the goat is completely
bogus custom. That is not the gentleman's faith,
where the animal is slaughtered. Mahabharata
declaration- non-violence is a virtue and Ultimate
dharma statement is appropriate to justify this. The
Pitamah Bhishma teaching describes the utter
rejection of meat. And though nobody believes, the
Mahabharata's 'Anushashana Parva' should be
interpreted in its own way. And If any Vedas or Vedic
Aryans will consider the proof of carnivores in Vedas,
it may be considered berserk.
Indeed, we agree that non-vegetarians frequently
project their tainted thoughts in several disguise,
which scholars will resolve through deliberate and
objective analysis. Your claim is-
Carnivores
In the palatinate realm of
Dharma, Artha &
inconspicuous Vedic Sciences