Asphalt Mix Fatigue Behavior: Experimental Structures and Modeling
Asphalt Mix Fatigue Behavior: Experimental Structures and Modeling
Asphalt Mix Fatigue Behavior: Experimental Structures and Modeling
Abstract. An extensive research program on asphalt asphalts of the same grade but from ditTerent origins
mix fatigue was conducted jointly by the LCPC led the LCPC to conduct a vast experimental program
(French transportation research laboratories) and examining asphalt fatigue on its circular fatigue test
Sc&auroute (French highway engineering agency) track between 1990 and 1994. The program sought to
between 1990 and 1994. answer the following questions :
The program included tests on the LCPC circular 0 Is the laboratory fatigue test of asphalt materials
fatigue test track and a theoretical analysis of the on which the French rational method of pavement
hehavior of structures. This article looks into the parts design is based, always rcalistic and representative of
of the program dealing with the fatigue tests and hehavior on the road ?
modeling. The aim of this program was to clarify the l Are there other fatigue tests which are more
behavior in the laboratory and on pavements of asphalt appropriate ?
mixes differing only in the type of asphalt. l What correlation coefficient should be adopted
Additionajly, it involved adding constituents to in the context of the French method for High Modulus
improve the design method in the case of high- Asphalt Mixes, developed with very hard binders ?
modulus asphalts. l What is the contribution of modificd binders in
On the fatigue test track more than 7 IO6 load the fatigue behavior of asphalt mixes ?
sequences were applied to twelve structures over the This program included three successive
course of three experiments. The experimental experiments, conducted in jointly with the ASFA
pavements revealed similar behavior in asphalt (Association of French motorway companies), with the
concrete of the same thickness, and the good involvement of the So&e des p&roles Shell in the
performance of high-mod&r.3 materials whenever first two tests and then EK4ntsr France. In
proper thicknesses were used. The model made it conjunction with these experiments on the test track a
possible to determine a correlection coefficient in long series of laboratory tests were carried out, in order
connection with rigid materials for the French to gain a better understauding of the me&misms
pavement design method and brought out the value of involved. The principal results of the observation and
controlled-force tests. the interpre-tation of this experimental series of tests
are the subject of this paper ; laboratory results are
Keywords. Fatigue bchavior - Experimental structures outlined in the article by de La Roche and Riviere
- Asphalt materials - Modeling. (1997).
After a brief description of the LCPC circular test
track and the methods used to monitor the
experimental pavements, the three successive
1 - INTRODUCTION experiments and their main results are presented. The
redts are then interpreted in the light of ah of test
DitTerences in behavior fatigue observed in the track findings and laboratory tests conducted at the
laboratory on asphalt concrete prepared with pure same time.
882
somewhat diEerent to the theoretical thicknesses ; it For this experiment, two loading phases can be
was necem.ry to take these diEerences into account distinguished.
when the results were interpreted. The actual A first phase, referred to as “cold”, with 90 % of
thitiesses are summarised in Table 2. The presence the loads applied between 0” C and 15” C (temperature
is also noted of a zone of low thickness for a length of measured every hour at the middle of the asphalt layer,
a few meters for the “EME” of sector III. at a depth of 40 mm), took place between October and
December 1990 and comprised 1,165,OOO loads. In
terms of rain, this phase was characterized by strong
rain at the very beginning of the test and during the
Structure m structure Il last 200,000 loads. There was practically no rain
EMEC lo10 BBA5WO between these two periods. As previously agreed, this
4% 5,4% phase was stopped after the first appearance of
BBTM 25 nun BBTM 25 m degradation on sectors I (“BB” B) and II (“BB” A).
BMF.c somm
A second phase referred to as “hot”, during which
GRH 203nnn GRH ?GOmn 80 % of the loads were made between 15 and 20’ C
GBH 2OJmm GRH mmm (temperature measured every hour at the middle of the
asphalt layer, at a depth of 40 mm), was conducted
between May and July 1991 with the application of
1,565,OOO additional loads. This second phase was
stopped after a signilicaut state of degradation was
obtained on all sectors. In terms of rainfa4 there was
very little rain over the whole of this second phase,
except for the first 100,000 loads.
The tkst phase was preceded by an initial
measurement sequence called “as built” state.
Table 2 : mean thickness and standard Table 3 : “as built” measurements results for
deviation of the testing 1 structures (mm) the experiment 1 - evolution of the average
deflections during the “cold” period
H. ODEON ET AL,. 885
mean thicknesses, this time they are close to the 6,296 I I 5.4%
Thus, sector I (“BB” B), entirely cracked and rest of sector III (thin “EME”) of 91 mm average
showing loss of material, was removed at one million thichess and thick “EME” of 115 mm thickuess, it is
loads and replaced by new materials. The same was noted that in order to reach a 50 % level of cracking, it
applied tn sectors II (BBS) and III (thin “EME”) at 2.2 is necessary to apply 2.5 limes as many loads on the
million loads. Only sector IV (thick “EME”) withstood thick sector as on the thin sector.
the 3.2 million passages relatively well.
During the first phase, from the beginning to I
Deflection (11100 mm)
million loads, there was heavy rainfd and a 180
signitlcant increase in the ground water level. From 1 160
million to 2.2 miIlion loads, the rainfhll was less. 140
There was little rair&dl at the end of the test which 120
meant aajficia.Ily watering sector IV (thick “EME”) 100
during the last 400,000 loads, in order to speed up the 80
evolution of the degradation. 60
40
In terms of temperatures, following a relatively 20
mild winter, there were no large seasonal variations, I -.A-. S IV(EMEDj
between November and April. There were, however,
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500
large daily fluctoations throughout the test. To Numberof loadings (x 1000)
summatize we can say that 100 % of the loads of the
Crst phase were applied at temperatures between 3 and Figure 10 : deflections evolution
13” C ; 90 % of the remaining loads were applied
during the 3rd experiment
between 5 and 20°C.
The evolution of the average deflections, at a
temperature of 2O”C, is shown in Figure 10. The rapid
evolution of the “BB” B of sector I (+ 70 %) is Extent of cIacking (?h)
100
observed, an evolution which displays very well the
degradation of this pavement which will be total at one 80
miIlion loads. The deflections on sectors II (BBS) and 60 - l -mSlII(EMED)
III (thin “EME”) increase more slowly with the trafIic,
however the increase is large as the deflections 40
increase hm 50 to 65 % respectively after 2 million
loads. Finally, sector IV (thick “EME”) only sees its 20
average deflection increase by 35 % during the Grst
two million loads ; at 3.2 million loads the increase in 0
deflections of this sector will reach 75 %. 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500
The evolution of radii of curvature is certainly Numberof loadings (I 1000)
going to take account of the initial evolution of the
pavements, since at 700,000 loads, they are divided by Figure 11 : extent of cracking
4, 2.5, 2 and 1.3 respectively on the sectors I, II, HI at the end of the 3rd experiment
and IV.
The levels of cracking of the four pavements,
expressed in relation to the traffic, are shown in Figure 3.3.4 - Preliminary conclusions for the 3rd
Il. These levels corroborate the various measurements experiment. These conclmions are relatively
and observations mentioned above. On the first three straightfonvard
sectors, the evolutions are sharp, but with discrepancies l On a deformable supporting course of 2 to 3
between them. The first cracks observed on sector III mm deflection, the use of a modified asphalt, BB S
(thin “EME”) appeared in a zone of a few meters type, increases the life duration very slightly compared
where the thickness varied around 85 mm. If one with an asphalt concrete with pure asphalt, all things
compares this small zone of sector III (thin “EIvW) of beingequal.
85 mm to sectors I (“BB” B) and II (BBS) of l On a deformable supporting layer, an “EME”
equivalent thickness, it is noted that in order to reach 10120 (high modulus asphalt mix) does not provided a
the same state of degadation on these three sectors, by significant improvement compared with an asphalt
choosing the traf& of sector I (“BB” B) as reference, it concrete 50/70, for courses of thickness of the order of
is necessary to apply traffics 45 % greater on the zone 80 mm. It appears that these thin EME courses display
of 85 mm thickness of sector III (thin “EME”) and 75 weak behavior.
% greater on sector II (BBS). If one now looks at the
890
l The life duration of an “EME” structure l the BB S asphalt is not very structured.
increases rapidly, and hence its economic value, with
its thickness. By increasing from 90 to 110 mm of 4.2 - Asphalt mixes. The tests were carried out on
EME multiplies the life duration by 2.5. samples taken firorn plates of materials removed tiom
the site, Tom non-circulated zones of the test track at
3.5 - Summary of the experimental results of the test the end of the experiment.
track. Experiments 1 and 2 have clearly shown that
the two asphalt concretes “BB”A and “BB”B, 4.2.1 - Complex modulus. The complex modulus
developed from asphalts of the same grade but dif&rent tests were conducted according to the standard NFP
origins, with very different fatigue characteristics 98-260-2 ; some characteristic values are shown in
measured in the laboratory, have similar behavior on Table 8.
pavement. If one compares experiments 1 and 2, a hardening
All of the experiments in the asphalt mix fatigue of the different materials in experiment is noted in
program have hi&lighted the rigid behavior of the comparison to those fabricated for experiment 1.
high modulus asphalt mixes, with the advantages aud However, the relative classification of the various
disadvantages that entailS. Concerning the materials remains the same.
disadvantages, this material does not withstand
excessive strains caused by an under-sizing or a 4.2.2 - Fatigue tests. Different fatigue tests were
supporting course that is too deformable. As the first canied out : with controlled displacement or force,
test showed, it is clearly preferable to use a more with and without rest periods, on trapezoidal or
classical asphalt road base material technique and with prismatic samples. These di&rent procedures, carried
a greater thickness. The rapid evolution of the out by different laboratories, are summarized in Table
degradation once the first cracks appear is also a major 9 (next page).
disadvantage. Concerning the advantages, if this
material is suitably designed, it offers a structural
contribution and resistance to rut development that is
distinctly superior to that obtained with classical 50/70A 50/70B SOl7OS 10/2OC lOl20D
asphalt techniques of the same thickness. 12 123 3 12 3
The third experiment has allowed the contribution
bef. aft. bef. aft. bef. a&. bef. aft. bef. aft.
of using asphalt materials with modified binders (SBS Pene 65 42 61 37 59 39 16 13 20 14
type.) to be verified. The fatigue behavior is slightly TBA 48 53 51 59 60 65.5 69.5 75 63 69.5
superior to that of a pure asphalt material, all things lppfeif -1.1 -0.9 -0.5 0.1 - - 0.3 0.8 -0.3 0.1
being equal.
Pene : penetration at 25°C (MOO mm) ; TBA : Ring
4 - LABORATORY TESTS
and Ball temperature (“C) ; IP Pfeif: Pfeifer
This article only presents the principal penetration index
characteristics of the materials tested. For more detail, Table 7 : characteristics of the used binders
refer to the article by de La Roche and Rivi&re (1997). before and after RTFOT
4.1 - Asphalt binders. The asphalt mixes have been
the subject of ordinary laboratory tests (penetrability, SI SD SIII SIV
ring and ball temperature, complex modulus test). The
main characteristics obtained on the binders of origin, Experiment 1 BBB BBA EMEC GBA
before and atIer RTFOT, are summarized in Table 7. 1o”c-1oHz 10300 12400 15000 13500
The tests carried out show that : 20% 1OHZ 5 100 5 900 9 800 7 100
l the asphalts used are conformed to French Experiment 2 BBA BBB GBA EMEC
staudards ; loOc-loHz 16100 12900 17500 18300
l asphalt A is more kinetically aud thermally 20%IOHz 7 800 5 800 9100 11600
susceptible than asphalt B ;
l asphalt B has thermal susceptibility which Experiment 3 BBB BBS EME D
increases over the course of the experiments (which lo”c-1oHz 12 400 11 300 18 800
reduces the difference with asphalt A) ; it is always less 20%1 OHZ 6 100 5 300 12 300
structured than asphalt A ; Table 8 : complex modulus values (MPa),
l the hard asphalts are of very similar kinetic and at 1 OHz, for 10°C and 20°C
thermal susceptibility ;
H. ODBON ET AL. 891
1 LCPC
3 levels of 8 samples
3 20 40 23 LCPC
3 levels of 8 samples 23 LPC Bordeaux
or 12 samples 2 Shell SRSA
4 20 40 a- 1:5
6 samples
2 Shell SRSA
5 20 40 -%- 1:lO
3 levels of 8 samples 3 LPC Bordeaux
or 6 samples 2 Shell SRSA
20 40
3 levels of 8 samples 23 LPC Bordeaux
or 12 samples 2 Shell SRSA
20 25 Wh 1 LPC Bordeaux
3 levels of 8 samples
8 20 40 LPC Bordeaux
3 levels of 8 samples
10 20 40 -%- 1:lO
3 levels of 8 samples 3 LPC Bordeaux
or 6 samples 2 Shell SRSA
11 20 40 1 Shell KSLA
6 to 8 samples
12 Shell KSLA
4.2.3 - Comments. For the asphalt mixes, the theoretical life duration of the pavement, by using a
following is observed : relation born directly from the fatigue law of the
l the values of modulus measured by the different material in the laboratory ; in addition to de fatigue
laboratories are consistent, on the one hand between law, this relationship takes into accost the long term
materials when one successively compares the results bearing capacity of the gromd, the probability of
for each laboratory, on the other hand for the same failure of the pavement and comprises the shift factor.
material from measurements taken in the d%erent The approach adopted in interpreting these
laboratories ; the increase of the moduli during experiments is based on this logic. Firstly, using values
experiment 2 is due to a higher compaction of the of deflection and radius of curvature measured on the
materials sampled in place. surface, the equivalent structure is defined which
l the classification of materials according to their allows the calculation of similar strains to those
fatigue test characteristics depends on the test used, measured within the structure to be obtained. It is then
depending on whether one works with controlled possible to calculate the loading (stresses and/or
displacement or force, with or without rest periods. strains) which combined with the laboratory fatigue
. the value of 06 or ~6 increases for materials test results allow the theoretical service life of the
with the introduction of rest periods. structures to be determined according to the following
relationship :
5 - MODELING
lib
The work reported in this article follows that
presented at the 73rd TRE? by de La Roche and al
(1994). In this publication, the results were quoted for
the first experiment conducted on this subject. where ~4 : shin calculated in the structure
In this part, we first of all discuss the approach equivalent to circuit of one load ;
used in interpreting the results, as well as the principal ~$3) : straiu causing the failure of the sample
results obtained from interpreting experiment 1. Next, after lo6 applications of the loading
the results of interpreting experiments 2 and 3 will be stress/strain at a temperature of 0 “C ;
presented, and l?nally the summary of information b : slope of the fatigue curve ;
obtained after these three experiments. N : theoretical life duration of the structure ;
k: shift factor translating the difference
5.1 - Modeling of experiment No. 1 between theoretical method and
observations on actual pavement.
51.1 - Principle. Interpretation is based on the
French method of pavement design, described in the In the following, the shitt factor k of the method is
technical Guide ‘Conception et dimensiomrement des determined which allows the observed service life to be
stmctores de chaussees’ (“Structural Design of Road found on the test track ; a shitl factor of 1 translates an
Pavements”) (1994). It concerns a rational method interpretation that describes reality exactly; an
based on the following principle. identical shift factor for all the materials would
Stresses and strains induced by an axle in the indicate that the fatigue test adopted is representative
pavement are calculated at its initial stage. The effect of the relative behavior of the structures.
of the tragic and of its repeated loads is taken into
account with the help of the fatigue law, based on a 51.2 - Principal results. In interpreting
constant stress or strain level test. The pavement is experiment 1, sectors 3 and 4 were divided into hvo
assumed broken for a certain extent of cracking zones to take into account differences in thickness
depending on its service level. A shitl factor, based on (Table 10). The stresses and strains have been
observed performance, is introduced to predict the life calculated within the structure with circular imprint,
duration of the pavement. The method does not take conforming to those adopted in the French standard
into account the evolution of the bearing capacity of method, and with rectangular shaped imprint, closer to
the pavement (estimated by deflection for instance). real imprint and allowing a better approximation to the
To be more precise, the loading stress (strains strains measured. The principal results of the
and/or stresses) is calculated within the pavement calculation are listed in Table 10.
structure with the help of the elastic Burmister multi- From this analysis, it arises that :
layer elastic model ; the pavement is modeled by an l adopting rectangular imprint for the calculation
equivalent structure ; the load is approximated by improves the modeling (reduction of the difference
circular shaped imprints. The loading (strain a&or between measured and calculated strains) ;
stress) thus obtained is then used to determine the
H. ODfiON ET AL. 893
SI SII SIII SIV calculated from equivalent structures with the help of
BBA BBB GBA EMEC an elastic model @mister for the circnlar imprints,
C&r-LCPC for the rectangular imprints) at 15’ C and
Thickness (m)
10 Hz. The temperature of 15” C is the equivalent
Mat. bitx. 0.093 0.078 0.108 0.058 temperature adopted in France for the calculation of
GRH3 - - - 0.050 design ; 10 Hz corresponds to the representative
GRH2 0.238 0.239 0.216 0.206 frequency of load passage. Calculations carried out for
GRHI 0.23 I 0.225 0.218 0.250 a temperature of 20°C and a frequency of 40 Hz
Number of cycles on the circular test track (identical to the conditions of several of the tests) have
(50% cracking) led to similar results (the moduli of the asphalt
(x1000) 1 000 315 375 360 materials being close to those at 15°C - 10 Hz) : the
results thus obtained will not be stated.
Measured strain min/max (pdef) It is to be noted that the vertical strains at the
&lone MEI 19 55/191 17/340 81/244 ground surface and the GRB surface are not
%ms MB 91/l 11 lW149 153 264 determining factors ; the life duration is estimated Born
Evert GRH - 948 1144 - the maximum of the longitndinal strain and the
Evert sol 755 - 147 - transversal strain (ditto for an analysis of stress). The
shift factor is determined from the number of passages
Calculated E et o at 15OC - 1OHz having led to 50 % cracked pavement (which is
ct max circ. 218 291 181 243 associated with 50 % risk of failure).
rect. 182 230 155 186 The loading stresses and strains calculated within
cstmax circ. 3.633 3.733 3.350 4.998 equivalent structures are also combined with the
rect 3.103 3.094 2.915 4.058 different test results available, with controlled
displacement or controlled force (Table 11). All the
Characteristics for calculation results are not reported here, neighboring laboratory
~E*(15°C,10Hz)~ 12000 9 300 13 300 14 900 results providing similar shitt factors.
Proc.1 &(Ti 90 122 82 122
-l/b 5.2 5.3 7.3 5.9 c) Conclusions
Proc.3 &A 95 134 87 130 Concerning the controlled displacement tests, it is
-l/b 4.6 6.7 4.3 5.9 noted that :
Proc.4 Eh 131 160 103 127 l de shift factor determined for the “BB” A is
-l/b 5.1 4.2 5.9 3.6 greater than that of “BB’B by 20 % approximately ;
Proc.6 crh 0.76 0.65 0.79 1.22 l the shift factor associated with the “EME” C
-l/b 5.2 6.0 4.8 5.6 remains much lower than those of the “BB” asphalt
Proc.8 06 1.15 1.01 1.09 1.62 concretes ;
-l/b 5.8 6.4 5.6 7.0 l that of the “GB” is also lower than those of the
“BB”‘s : this does not conform with the usual situation,
Back-calculated shift factor k
but no rational explanation could be offered ;
Proc. 1 circ. imp. 2.09 1.63 1.68 1.51 l the introduction of rest periods in the tests
rect. imp. 1.74 1.29 1.44 1.16 improves the estimation of life duration in absolute
Proc.3 circ. imp. 2.84 2.33 2.00 1.78 terms (reduction of the value of the shift factor) but
rect. imp. 2.37 1.84 1.71 1.36 does not signiticantly refine things in relative terms.
Proc.4 circ. imp. 2.06 1.76 1.79 1.63 These results contirm the observations made
rect. imp. 1.72 1.39 1.54 1.25 during experiment 1.
Proc.6 circ. imp. 3.87 3.72 2.87 3.01 For the stress analysis, it is observed that :
rect. imp. 3.30 3.09 2.49 2.44 l the shift factors of the two “BB” samples are
Proc.8 circ. imp. 2.55 2.43 2.14 2.35 close, irrespective of the test procedure ; again we find
rect. imp. 2.18 2.01 1.86 1.91 one of the conclusions of experiment 1.
Table 11 : characteristics for calculations of l the shi8 factors of the “GB” and the “EME” C
modelling and results - Experiment 2 are close, but lower than for the “BB” ’ s ;
l the introduction of rest periods causes a
reduction of the shitt factors of all the materials, which
b) Service life is positive, without bringing the values close together
The analysis approach adopted is the one (which would be indicative of a representative test of
described previously. The stresses and strains are real behavior).
H. ODeON ET AL. 895
traffic. However, this rut development of the The calculations of Mode Factor were carried out
supporting layer which is limited, has probably for each pavement from the equivalent structure, for a
disrupted the fatigue mechanism very little. We shall modulus of asphalt material at 15°C - 10 Hz, for which
assume that it does not intervene in the following a reduction of modulus of 50 % has been considered
analysis. (Table 13).
The analysis was conducted for the test results
obtained with controlled displacement and for those
obtaiued with controlled force. SI sn SIII SIV
Phase 1
c) Conclusions BBB BBA EMEC GBA
Irrespective of the type of test, it is noted that : O.d8 0.03 -O.Ol/-0.11 -0.13/-0.21
l the use of rectangular imprint leads to a lesser
dispersion of the values of the shi8 factor. Phase 2
l the “EME” had behavior consistent with its BBA BBB GBA EMEC
thickness: the shift factor is identical for sectors Ill -0.27 -0.13 -0.34 0.12
bhin “EME’Y and IV (thick “EME”) , ,: Phase 3
l the &ft factor to be retained for the “EME” is BBB BBS EMED EMED
always less than that of the asphalt concretes. 0.09 0.16 0.05 -0.06
Concerning the tests with controlled displacement,
it is observed that : Table 13 : Mode Factor values
. the shift factors obtained for the two asphalt
concretes “BB” B and “BB” S are identical, both for
the reference test at 10” C - 25 Hz and for the test at It is noted that the structures studied have a Mode
2O”C-4OHzwithrestperiod(l: 10); Factor close to 0, which explains that one can not rule
l estimation of the life duration of the structures precisely on their mode of ftmctioniug. It concerns
is improved by the use of the characteristics resultiug structures for low to medium trafEc; one might
from the tests with rest periods, in absolute terms ; but reasonably think that thicker structures would behave
the modeling is not significantly better iu relative iu a clearer fashion for the controlled stress mode.
terms; The Mode Factor does not therefore depend on the
Concemiug the tests with controlled force, it single surface asphalt course (example : phase 3,
results that : structure II having 9 1 mm of “EME”, functioning with
l these tests do not contribute a great improve- controlled displacement) : it is the rigidity of the
ment in terms of the choice of shift factors of the di@- structure overall (surface course and supporting layer)
rent materials (neither in terms of the estimation of which determines the type of functioning. This
real life duration of the structure - i.e. shi8 factor close mechanism can be visuahzed easily by plotting the
to 1 - nor in terms of the relative behavior of the mate- evolution of Mode Factor versus the rigidity of the
rials - identical shift factors for the d&rent materials); structnre (fig. 12) :
l the results obtained from the tests with rest
periods are better in absolute terms, but not in relative E asphalt 3
concrete X Hasoh& concrete
terms. St =
EGRH x r3
5.4 - Interpretation by using the Mode Factor. These
analyses were carried out experiment by experiment MF
and reveal a disparate ftmctioning of some structures 0.40
with respect to others. In order to clarify these apparent
0.20
differences in behavior between structures, the notion
of Mode Factor, introduced by Monismith (1971), is
0.00
used. The Mode Factor MF is obtained by calculating:
MF=(A-B/(A+B) -0.20
where A and B are the relative variations of
stresses and strains calculated within a structure for a -0.40
given reduction of the mod&s of the asphalt course. A 1.00 10.00 lco.00
value of MF equal to 1 (and by extension, positive) st VahIc
corresponds to behavior with controlled strain, MF = -
1 (or negative) corresponds to behavior with controlled Figure 12 : relationship
stress. between “Stiffness” and Mode Factor
H. ODEON ET AL. 891
5.5 - Summary of the modeling. In conclusion of the layer model by Burmister and associated with the
interpretation of these three experiments, it can be controlled displacement fatigue test at lO”C, 25Hz :
stated that : 1. the shill factor to be retained for the high
l for these structures that are not very thick, the modulus asphalt mixes (“EME”) is 1 (as a reminder,
modeling is improved if one adopts the same that of the asphalt concretes is 1.3) : this value has
rectangular shaped imprints, close to the real imprints been conl%rmed by a study of actual pavements already
of tires. The order of magnitude of calculated loading built with these materials ;
stresses and strains and the ratios between longitudinal 2. the moditied asphalt concrete “BB” S confIrms
and transversal loading stresses are impoved. its good behavior on the road : at equivalent thickness,
. if one considers the usual French method of it has had a life duration practically double that of the
design which combines a linear elastic modeling and reference asphalt concrete.
the controlled strain test conducted at IO”C, 25Hz : l concerning the results from the modeling car-
a. the relative behavior of the asphalt concretes ried out from other fatigue tests, it is to be noted that :
“BB” B, “BB s” as well as the “GB” A (from the tirst 3. the controlled force tests improve the modeling
experiment) validates the present method ; of the relative behavior of the asphalts BB A and BB B,
b. the shift factor associated with “EME” and the more rigid materials GB A and EME ; estima-
structures is always less than that adopted for the tion of the life duration is less good in absolute terms ;
asphalt concretes ; 4. the introduction of rest periods improves the
c. it is not possible to explain with the aid of this modehng a little : the increase observed in the value of
usual modehng approach the di%rence of behavior E6(or of 06) allows the estimation of life duration to be
with the fatigue test observed between “BB” B and improved (reduction of shift factor), but it is not
“BB” A, a ditTerence which does not appear on real enough to explain the differences in behavior of the
pavements ; “soft” materials (asphalt concrete type) and rigid
. if one considers other fatigue tests carried out, materials (EME and GB A type) ;
with controlled displacement or force, with or without 5. Consequently, there are no obvious reasons in
rest periods, it is noted that : the short term to question the fatigue test currently
d. the controlled force tests allow the relative used in France (controlled displacement, lo”, 25 Hz).
behavior of the BB A and BB B during the first two . concerning the modeling, it is noted that the for
experiments to be found by modeling, as well as the structures with low rigidity such as those studied, the
relative behavior of the rigid materials EME and use of a rectangular impriut, close to that of a tire,
GBA ; the shift factors to be adopted remain different greatly improves the estimation of loading stresses in
however; these tests do not allow the duration of life of the upper courses of the pavement.
the BB S to be estimated correctly.
e. the tests with rest period, conducted for strain REFERENCES
and stress, improve the estimation of service life, bnt
do not allow the relative behavior of the difherent Au&et P. et al., “The Circular Test Track of the
materials to be explained either. Laboratoire Central des Ponts et Chaussees,
Names - First Results”, Proc. of the Sixth Znt.
6 - CONCLUSIONS Co@ on Asphalt Pavements, pp. 550-561, 1987
De La Roche et al., “Study of the Fatigue of Asphalt
The Asphalt Mix Fatigue experiments, conducted Mixes Using the Circular Test Track of the
between 1990 and 1994 on the LCPC circular fatigue Laboratoire Central des Ponts et C&au&es in
test track, consisted of testing, during three distinct Nantes, France”, Proc. ofthe 73rd TRB, no 1436,
experiments, twelve structures made of six different 1994.
materials : three asphalt concretes, two high-modulus De La Roche et al., “Fatigue Behavior of Asphalt
asphalt mixes and one conventional asphalt road base Mixes - Influence of test procedures on Laboratory
material. This program was accompanied by a long Fatigue Performances”, Proc. of the Eighth Int.
series of tests on asphalt materials, designed so as to Co@ on Asphalt Pavement, 1997
assess their behavior towards fatigue according to dif- Monismith C.L. and Salam Y.M., “Distress Characte-
ferent test procedures ; the results of this set of tests are ristics of Asphalt Concrete Mixtures”, Proc.
cited in the article by de La Roche and Riviere (1997). Association of Asphalt Paving Technologtits, Vol
Analysis of the behavior of the structures has 42, 1973
showu the following points : Guide technique Conception et dimensiomrement des
l in the framework of the French method of new chaussees (Technical Guide for the Structural
pavement design, based on the linear elastic multi- Design of Pavements), SETRA-LCPC, 1994