WCECS2009 pp112-117
WCECS2009 pp112-117
WCECS2009 pp112-117
A. Raw Material
Freshly harvested cassava roots (Manihot esculenta) were
purchased locally and used in all experiments. After washing
and peeling, the cassava roots were cut into pieces of
16x16x2 mm3.
B. Dehydration Method
Raw and processed cassava pieces were subjected to a Figure 2. Schematic diagram of global processing
stream of hot air at 50 oC in a hot air dryer (Venticell Dryer).
The cassava pieces were dried until the residual water content
of about 20-25 %wb. was reached before DIC treatment. The
same hot air dryer and conditions were used for initial as well
as for final dehydration.
C. The DIC Reactor
The DIC reactor is shown schematically in Fig. 1. The
reactor consisted of four major components, i.e. (a) the
processing vessel (1.5x10-3 m3 volume), where samples were
placed and treated, (b) the vacuum system, which consisted
mainly of a vacuum tank with a volume 60-fold greater than
the processing vessel, (c) the adequate vacuum pump, and (d)
the pressure-dropping system, which is a pneumatic valve,
separated the processing vessel from the vacuum tank and
Figure 3. DIC temperature and pressure history: PA and TA are the
could be operated after a high steam pressure treatment and if
steam pressure and temperature respectively in the processing
required before the injection of steam in order to establish an vessel, PV the vacuum tank pressure, TP temperature of product: (a)
initial vacuum in the processing vessel. sample at atmospheric pressure; (b) initial vacuum; (c) saturated
D. The Experiment Procedure steam injection to reach the selected pressure; (d) constant
temperature corresponding to saturated steam pressure; (e) abrupt
The general experimental protocol is detailed in Fig. 2. pressure drop towards vacuum; (f and g) releasing to the
After preparing the raw material, initial partial dehydration atmospheric pressure.
was carried out. This is required pre-treatment before the DIC
processing. The food sample was then treated in the processing vessel
in which a vacuum of 5 kPa was established by a brief
connection with the vacuum tank (Fig. 3-b). The initial
vacuum treatment facilitated the diffusion of steam into the
sample. Consequently, the time necessary for the temperature
of the sample to reach the steam temperature was reduced.
Saturated steam was then introduced into the vessel at a
fixed pressure level (Fig. 3-c) and maintained for a
predetermined time (Fig. 3-d). This step was followed by a
sudden pressure drop (Fig. 3-e). The rapid pressure drop
inside the processing vessel induced a rapid cooling of the
sample which passed in less than one second from 100–144
°C (depending on the steam pressure conditions) to about 30
°C. Treatment ended by a releasing to the atmospheric
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the DIC reactor: (a) treatment pressure (Figure 3-f & g); as the atmospheric air injection
vessel with heating jacket; (b) vacuum tank with cooling liquid then occurs under vacuum, the air expansion decreased
jacket; (c) vacuum pump; (d) instant pressure-drop valve. further the treated food temperature.
ρw G G G ρ
(ν w − ν m ) = − Deff gr ad w (1) F. Water and Oil –Holding Capacity Determination
ρm ρm
Method proposed by J.A. Larrauri [19] was used with
slight modification. Five milliliters of distilled water or
where: commercial
ρw : apparent density of water in the material (kg.m-3), olive oil were added to 0,2 g of dry sample, incubated at 40
ρm : apparent density of dry material (kg.m-3), o
C for 1 h. After centrifugation, the liquid phase was
vw : absolute velocity of water flow within the porous separated
medium (m.s-1). and the residue was weighed. WHC and OHC were
vm : absolute velocity of solid medium (m.s-1). calculated as g water or oil absorbed per g of dry sample,
Deff : effective diffusivity of water within the solid medium respectively.
(m².s-1).
G. Determination of Microbial Content
Mounir & Allaf [11] assumed neglecting effects of The microbial content of the cassava samples were
possible shrinkage, and with the hypothesis of constant analyzed using total plate count method. A ten gram sample
effective diffusivity during drying, Fick’s second law was aseptically blended and serially diluted using peptone
becomes for 1-D: saline water (0.85% NaCl and 0.1% peptone) in test
Pre-Drying Final Drying Figure 6. Surface plot of the water holding capacity
Pre-drying
Final drying
at t = 110 minutes
Conventional
DIC Treatment
Drying
Figure 4. The profile of the moisture content change during pre- Table 2. The regression coefficients
and final-drying.
The The Responses
coefficients Deff WHC OHC
β0 - 1.831 16.067 4.960
β1 1.360 - 2.546 - 1.372
β2 0.097 - 0.473 - 0.076
β11 - 0.173 0.394 0.138
β22 - 0.001 0.008 0.001
β12 - 0.003 0.014 0.007
R2 17.67% 34.53 % 21.81 %
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors wish to thank THE ABCAR-DIC PROCESS
SAS, La Rochelle France for providing a set of DIC
equipment.