Final Examination in Projective Techniques: Submitted To: Connie C. Magsino Professor
Final Examination in Projective Techniques: Submitted To: Connie C. Magsino Professor
Final Examination in Projective Techniques: Submitted To: Connie C. Magsino Professor
Submitted to:
Connie C. Magsino
Professor
Submitted by:
Christine Joy G. Aquino
MaEd-Educational Management
1. Explain the origin and rationale of projective techniques.
It is a personality evaluation to draw out significant information related to one’s unconscious mind and
its working. In such a test, the individual responds to some vague stimuli, such as pictures, words and
the like. Projective assessments are designed to be open-ended and to encourage free expression of
thoughts and feelings, thereby revealing how an individual thinks and feels. The response so obtained
is analyzed by expert to reveal hidden emotions and internal conflicts. It’s quite different from an
"objective test", where the responses are analyzed as per a common standard (for example, a multiple
choice exam). The responses are content-analyzed for deeper meanings and interpretations.
These tests originate from psychoanalysis which argues that human behavior is greatly shaped by
unconscious attitudes and motivations which are hidden from consciousness.
Projective techniques and their application represent a point of significant intersection for
psychoanalytic theory, clinical psychology, social psychology, and cultural anthropology. These
instruments include a wide array of materials, instructions, and interpretative rules, but in spite of this
diversity, there are certain common qualities that distinguish them from other personality measures,
such as inventories, ratings, or situational tests.
The most distinctive feature of projective techniques concerns the presentation to the subject of a task
that is relatively unstructured. This lack of structure involves ambiguous or vaguely defined stimuli and
a relatively unrestricted set of response alternatives by means of which the subject may assign
meaning to the stimulus material. It is generally assumed that in the process of choosing between the
many alternatives for structuring or interpreting the ambiguous stimulus material, the subject reveals
significant and fundamental aspects of himself. Ordinarily such devices are considered to be particularly
responsive to latent or unconscious components of the person, and consistently there is a minimum of
subject awareness concerning the purpose of the test. The response data are typically profuse and
often involve fantasy or imaginary creations. The instruments are highly multidimensional; that is, they
are intended to provide information concerning a large number of personality dimensions.
Projective techniques and their application represent a point of significant intersection for
psychoanalytic theory, clinical psychology, social psychology, and cultural anthropology. These
instruments include a wide array of materials, instructions, and interpretative rules, but in spite of this
diversity, there are certain common qualities that distinguish them from other personality measures,
such as inventories, ratings, or situational tests.
The most distinctive feature of projective techniques concerns the presentation to the subject of a task
that is relatively unstructured. This lack of structure involves ambiguous or vaguely defined stimuli and
a relatively unrestricted set of response alternatives by means of which the subject may assign
meaning to the stimulus material. It is generally assumed that in the process of choosing between the
many alternatives for structuring or interpreting the ambiguous stimulus material, the subject reveals
significant and fundamental aspects of himself. Ordinarily such devices are considered to be particularly
responsive to latent or unconscious components of the person, and consistently there is a minimum of
subject awareness concerning the purpose of the test. The response data are typically profuse and
often involve fantasy or imaginary creations. The instruments are highly multidimensional; that is, they
are intended to provide information concerning a large number of personality dimensions.
D. Hand Test
-consisting of ten cards upon which pictures of hands are drawn
-the subject is asked to tell what the hand looks like it is doing and the scored responses derive the extent of
interpersonal, environmental, maladjustive and withdrawal tendencies.
Construction techniques require the subject to go beyond simple association to a stimulus and to create
or construct a more elaborate product, which is typically a complete art form, such as a story or picture.
Thematic Apperception Test. Next to the Rorschach, the most widely used of all projective techniques
is the Thematic Apperception Test (Murray 1943). The TAT consists of cards containing black-and-
white pictures of vague scenes, and the instructions request the subject to compose a story to fit each
picture, describing what the people are thinking and feeling, what led up to the scene depicted, and
what the outcome will be. Analysis of TAT stories, which are usually recorded verbatim, is far from
standardized, although a number of general scoring systems have been proposed (e.g., Aron 1949;
Bellak 1947; Stein 1948; Tomkins 1947). Most of these systems focus on the content of behavior and
experiences described in the story, although they differ considerably in the unit of analysis employed
and the degree of inference required. As used clinically, interpretation typically has not rested upon a
set of objective scores for specific variables. The basic assumption of most schemes is one of a
psychological isomorphy between dispositions attributed to the part of the major character in the story
and those that exist in the storyteller.
The Blacky Pictures. Closely related to the TAT is the Blacky Pictures test (Blum 1949), which is
intended to investigate 11 specific psychoanalytic variables, including oral eroticism, oedipal intensity,
and castration anxiety. The test consists of 12 cartoons concerned with experiences in the life of a dog
named Blacky, including his relationships with Mama, Papa, and Tippy, a sibling. As its central feature
the procedure involves story construction in response to the pictures but adds indications of preference
and a series of direct questions for each picture. While administration is highly standardized, scoring
and interpretation are not.