Writing The Research Proposal
Writing The Research Proposal
Writing The Research Proposal
A research proposal is prepared prior to the actual conduct of the study. The presentation
of the proposal should be clear and concise. Each sentence should be meaningful and
straightforward. Avoid the use of poetic, flowery phrases or of description made in a roundabout
manner.
In writing the proposal, future tense is used and preferably in the passive voice.
The proposal should be presented according to the following sections and in the same
sequence. Headings should be typed in capital letters.
Sections/Components:
I. TITLE PAGE
II. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
III. TABLE OF CONTENTS
IV. CHAPTER I - BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
INTRODUCTION
Background of the Study
Objectives of the Study
Statement of the Problems
Assumptions of the Study
Significance of the Study
Scope of Limitations
Locale of the Study
Conceptual/Theoretical Framework of the Study
Definitions of Terms
VII. BIBLIOGRAPHY
VIII. APPENDICES
Constructed Guided Interview
Curriculum Vitae of the Researchers
Preliminary Parts of a Research Proposal
This section contains the introductory materials that place the research proposal in proper context.
A. TITLE PAGE
The title page contains the ff.
a. Research Title
b. Submission Statement
c. Full name(s) of the Researcher(s)
d. School
e. Full name of the Research Adviser
f. Date of Submission
Sample Title Page:
TO DIE OR NOT TO DIE?: COMMON PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERING
OF SHS STUDENTS AND HOW THEY DEAL WITH IT
10 single spaces
5-7single spaces
SIR OPPA
Research Teacher
7 single spaces
October 2019
A. TITLE OF THE STUDY – the title has already gave to you and your data must stick to
the title that your group has have.
The best time to write the title is after you have written the text (therefore you may revised
the title that has assigned to you), so that the title will reflect the paper’s content. Avoid phrases
such as “on the”, “a study of the effects”, “research on”, “report on”, “regarding”, and “use of”. In
most cases, omit “the” at the beginning of the title.
Spell out all terms and avoid symbols, formulas, and abbreviations. Whenever possible,
use words rather than expressions containing superscripts.
B. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This part is where the student researcher expresses his/her appreciation to significant
contributions made in completing the research.
C. TABLE OF CONTENTS
This is a listing of the different parts of the whole report with the corresponding page
number of each part. This page contains main titles and titles of the subtopics up to the third
level only. Chapter titles are all capitalized (see illustration). The main titles and subtitles
should be the same as those inside the manuscript.
CHAPTER I
Background of the Study
INTRODUCTION
This is the beginning part of the scientific paper. The function of the introduction is to give the
readers a comprehensive view of the particular field of study. Like any beginning part of a
scientific essay, the introduction must be clear and well-written in order to interest and excite the
reader to the research.
The introduction need not be very long although it must contain the following subsections:
This states of rationale of the study. It explains briefly why the investigator chose this study
to work on. It describes the circumstances that suggested the research.
The background answers the question: “Why will you conduct the study?” It may include
the following:
a. Historical account of events or condition/ explanation of the present situation
b. General problem
c. Rationale of the study/ basis justification why the study will be conducted.
To know…
To find out…
To determine…
To ascertain…
To explain… and many more.
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEMS
In this part, you just have stated in paragraph or paraphrasing the objectives of the study making
it into an interrogative form.
Instead of writing the hypotheses of the study, you will write what will be the possible answers to
the questions or finding of your study.
Example:
It is assumed that in this study the main reasons why students are always absent is about personal
struggles and negative attitude towards schooling.
You should provide at least positive and negative assumptions to your paper.
This part of the report highlights the possible contributions of the research findings to the country
or to various sectors of society. It describes the relevance of the research to feel the needs, how the
research output may be directly useful to people or how the research will contribute to solve that
particular problem.
You have to state in this part where your study will be conducted. The researcher should include
a map. However, if your approach is content analysis, this part or component will be omitted.
CONCEPTUAL AND THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF THE STUDY
In this part, you have to explain first the diagram that you will be using to illustrate the flow of
your paper. Hence, if you will be adopting certain theory it is advisable to discuss that theory
first and then how you come up with that particular conceptual.
Conceptual Flow of Research is the term will be replaced for Conceptual paradigm, please as a
teacher I also have lapses in information that provided. BUT the important thing is we
CORRECTED it. In QUALITATIVE RESEARCH we are not USING the TERM
RESEARCH PARADIGM, instead we may use the Conceptual Flow of Research or other
terms that your teacher will advise you to use.
DEFINITION OF TERMS
This section includes terms which should be interpreted in a manner unique to your
research, i.e., different from how they are defined in the dictionary.
It includes all the important variables in the study, especially those measured by means of
specific instruments or procedures.
CHAPTER II
NOTE: I already discussed in class what are the types of LITERATURE REVIEW. In your
case, you have to write your chapter II with ARGUMENTATIVE, INTEGRATIVE, approach
only.
One of the most important components of a good investigatory research paper is a properly
planned, adeptly conceptualized, and well-written Review of Related Literature. Reviewing and
organizing related studies is basic to all research. This will provide you with additional knowledge
and insights into the topic. It will also help you organize the concepts and principles fundamental
to your research.
Literature review consists of a collection of pertinent readings, published or unpublished,
in local or foreign settings. The literature will provide discussion of facts, principles, trends and
practices to which the present study is related.
a. Single Author
Deneau (1981) recommends that the pyrolysis apparatus or pyrolyzer should be so design
as to maintain an oxygen-deficient atmosphere and those materials of construction should
be corrosion-resistant.
Source: Pyrolysis of Plastic Wastes for the Production of a Fuel Substitute (1998 TOYS
National Finalist)
b. Two authors
Asphalt or bituminous concrete has the important advantage that traffic may use it
immediately after construction (Oglesby and Gayhicks, 1992).
OR
Oglesby and Gayhicks (1992) note that asphalt or bituminous concrete has the important
advantage that traffic may use it immediately after construction.
c. Multiple authors
The most biologically effective alternatives to chemicals for weed control in cultivated crops
that have been extensively evaluated are plant pathogens, more specifically, plant-
pathogenic fungi (Boyette, et al., 1991).
OR
Boyette, et al. (1991) report that the most biologically effective alternatives to chemicals
for weed control in cultivated crops that have been extensively evaluated are plant
pathogens, more specifically, plant-pathogenic fungi.
An organized and systematic presentation of the literature is crucial in any research. The
researcher who fails to assemble related literature in a systematic manner from the beginning may
not stay focused on his chosen topic. To help with this aspect of your research, the following are
some suggestions for organizing your Review of Related Literature.
a. Create categories for your literature review, grouping together similar studies or those that
tackle similar aspects of your research.
b. Begin with the most recent studies and then work backward.
c. Whenever possible, include an extensive review of relevant local research so that you will
avoid unintentional duplication of already conducted studies.
CHAPTER III
Research Methodology
This section describes in sufficient detail the procedures employed in the research so it can be
evaluated and repeated if necessary. Such description is important in evaluating the study.
The interpretation of the results of the study are taken in the light of the methods employed.
The validity and reliability of the methods employed enable the reader to put more confidence on
the results of the study. Reproducibility of data is a primary consideration in evaluating reliability
of the technique. Validity of the methods ensures that the data gathered are relevant and appropriate
to the problem being investigated.
Content
The methodology section informs the reader of the steps undertaken by the researcher and
how he did them. It includes the following:
COMPONENTS
The Participants
In this part, you have to state who are your participants are and how you are able to select them.
What method you select them and how they qualify as your respondents on the study. Those are
the usual questions being written on this part.
The Sampling
In quantitative you have already discussed the different sampling method. Therefore, you have to
think what particular sampling you employed on your paper. And why do you think it is applicable
to your paper. However, if your approach is content analysis no need to include this part.
This is the part where you have to write down how you will be able to get the data of your paper.
Is it through interview, narratology etc. then how you will be going to implement those in your
paper to collect the data needed.
DATA ANALYSIS
Go back to the discussions we had have in Data Analysis for Qualitative Research and think of
which among them you may apply for your paper and answer why, and how?
BACK MATTERS
BIBLIOGRAPHY – You as a researcher should state all the cited sources you used in your paper
and what are the related papers cited or not as long as it is relevant to the topic of your paper.
APPENDICES
You have to include the resume of each member and possible list of questions that you will ask to
your respondents.
PRESENTATION GUIDELINES
The panelist should have their printed copies of the paper. It means that your proposal must be
printed into three copies in which all the panelist should have their own copy.
The presenters should dress formally and provide snacks to the panelists.
The group members should pick which among them will be the two presenters of their paper.
If the paper will be redefense, three will be five points deductions in each redefense and should
inform the panelist when they will present their proposal again. During the redefense, they should
also provided three copies so that each panelist has have their own copy.
The rubrics will be discussed during the presentation.
There will be slide decks to use for the presentation of the proposal.