Nonproliferation, Arms Control Treaties Notes
Nonproliferation, Arms Control Treaties Notes
Nonproliferation, Arms Control Treaties Notes
https://www.nti.org/learn/treaties-and-regimes/treaties/
biological, chemical weapons, can also refer to small arms, other capabilities as well
possesses them
○ Horizontal - acquisition
● https://www.ifri.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/alberque_npt_origins_nato_nucle
ar_2017.pdf
signatory)
● Landmark intl treaty aiming to prevent spread of nuclear weapons, weapons tech,
States, entered into force 1970 w 3 depositary States (US, USSR, UK); 2005 189 State
Parties, only India, Israel, Pakistan, NoKor (withdrew 2003) (all nuclear-capable
proliferation regime
1
● Known states to have nuclear weapons: China, France, India, Israel, NoKor, Pakistan,
Russia, UK, US
● 1947 initial efforts to create intl system enabling all states to have access to nuclear
bw major powers
● 1953 US Pres Eisenhower proposed Atoms for Peace during 8th UN Gen Ass
session, creation of intl org to disseminate peaceful nuclear tech, guard against devt
Energy Agency (IAEA) - promotion, control of nuclear tech, can refer NPT non-
required for non-NWS under NPT, optional for non-NPT; states declare
nuclear material
● Article X - Conference convened 25 years after entry into force to decide whether
NPT should continue in force, May 1995 States agreed NPT (w/out vote) to extend
● Nuclear Weapon States - States that have built, tested nuclear explosive device
https://www.nti.org/learn/treaties-and-regimes/non-proliferation-and-disarmament-
initiative-npdi/
https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/focus/npt/npt-review-conferences
○ Aus, Canada, Chile, Germ, Japan, Mexico, the Netherlands, Nigeria, PH (joined
2
○ Ministerial-level group of states w/in NPT focused on practical steps that will
Sept 2010, meets 2 a year thereafter; does not have a formal consti or
unanimity)
efforts
https://www.armscontrol.org/ACT/2015_0708/Features/The-2015-NPT-
Review-Conference-and-the-Future-of-The-Nonproliferation-Regime
https://www.un.org/en/conf/npt/2015/
1988) https://www.state.gov/t/avc/trty/102360.htm
after the fall of the Soviet Union, US sustained treaty w Russian Fed, successor
states
3
● Prohibits signatories from possessing, producing, flight-testing
required elimination of missile bodies, launchers but did not result in the
● w/ effectivity of the Treaty in 1988, US destroyed 800, USSR 1,800 missiles including
launchers
● Pillar of the treaty VERIFICATION REGIME - includes on-site inspection, both sides
● China, India, DPKR, Egypt, India, Iran, Israel, Pakistran, US has not ratified
● US, Russian Fed Co-Chairs of GICNT; Finland - Implementation & Assessment Group
4
○ Enhance security of civilian nuclear facilities
nuclear/radiological material
○ Assure denial of safe haven, resources from terrorists seeking to acquire n/r
terrorism
○ ABM Treaty - limited strategic missile defences to 200 (later 100) interceptors
(SLBM) forces, both sides pledged not to construct new ICBM silos, not
warhead numbers
numbers of strategic nuclear delivery vehicles for the sides, to begin the process of
5
reduction of these delivery vehicles, impose restraints on qualitative devts w/c could
● 1974 Pres Ford, Gen Sec Brezhnev agreed to a basic framework (Aide-Memoire) for
the SALT II agreement; Aide-Memoire says new agreements will last until 1985
new agreement
● Pres Carter, Gen Sec Brezhnev signed completed SALT II 18 June 1979
terms of intl law to refrain from acts which would defeat the object, purpose
of the Treaty until it had made its intentions clear not to become party to
Treaty
○ Same year Pres Carter announces US would comply with Treaty provisions as
○ 1982 Pres Reagan states to not undercut SALT agreements as long as USSR
6
○ 1984, 1985 Pres Reagan declares USSR violated political commitment to
from undercutting
○ 1986 Pres Reagan states USSR has not complied with political commitment to
observe SALT agreements, including SALT II Treaty, USSR has not indicated its
outside NPT, or those that do not fully comply with IAEA safeguards
● Not legally binding; US, Russia, China have taken advantage of this to pursue civilian
Multilateral Agreements
● 1st treaty to provide for deep reductions of US & USSR strategic nuclear weapons
● P5+1 and Iran negotiation over 2 years; Obama admin said JCPOA aims to set back
Iran’s nuclear program so that if Iran were to produce enough fissile material -
7
● Endorsed by UN SC Reso 2231; Iran’s compliance w nuclear-related JCPOA
○ 16 Jan 2016 JCPOA’s entry to force,IAEA certifies Iran has taken key steps in
○ Oct 2023 Transition Day - triggers UN to lift missile restrictions, Iran to seek
certain sanctions
majority vote of members can grant access to IAEA inspectors to suspect undeclared
Iran
● Aside from fear of US sanctions, corruption, mismanagement, aging infra are factors
rising inequality drove a week of widespread protest that began at the end of 2017
program)
● P5+1 urge US to remain in JCPOA; EU could seek to insulate Euro firms from US
secondary sanctions, facilitate oil trade w Iran, but JCPOA could still erode if Euro
measures to preserve are not sufficient for trade, investment to continue, much less
increase
8
Nuclear-Weapon-Free-Zones (5)
Treaty for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons in Latin America & the
1995)
Semipalatinsk 2006)
https://www.iaea.org/topics/nuclear-weapon-free-zones