Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Supplemental Grad Rate Slides

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 109

Graduation Rates:

Students Who Started 9th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008

Supplemental Packet

Revised Cohort Definitions


Federal regulations require states to report graduation rates using a new federal cohort definition
1. Under New Yorks old cohort definition, students who have been enrolled in a school or district for fewer than five months are not counted in the cohort for graduation rate reporting purposes. The new federal definition includes in the cohort any student who has been enrolled one day or longer. 2. Under the old cohort definition, students who are incarcerated are considered transfers and are not included in the cohort for graduation rate reporting purposes. The new federal cohort definition will count incarcerated youth as transfers only if the student attends a program offering courses that can result in the earning of credit toward a high school diploma. Incarcerated youth who do not attend these types of programs count as dropouts. 3. Under the old cohort definition, ungraded students with disabilities are counted in a cohort based on the school year in which they reach age 17. The new federal cohort definition requires that all students be counted in a cohort based upon the year in which they first entered a ninth grade program.

Revised Cohort Definitions


These revised cohort definitions apply to the 2008 cohort results after 4 years, 2007 cohort results after 4 and 5 years, and the 2006 cohort results after 5 and 6 years. These rules now apply to all school districts, including Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse, and Yonkers. Aggregations for New York City (city-wide results), Need/Resource Capacity categories (N/RC), and other statewide aggregations (e.g., race/ethnicity, etc.) have always used the one-day enrollment rule.

Aspirational Performance Measures - Definitions


Aspirational Performance Measures (APMs) were calculated based on the total number of students in the 2008 and 2007 cohorts as of June 2012 and 2011, respectively (including students who dropped out or transferred to an approved GED program). Graduation rate is the percentage of these students who graduated with a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation diploma. Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation requires 22 units of credit, passing 7 to 9 Regents examinations with 65 or above, and advanced course sequences in languages other than English, CTE, or the arts. ELA/Math APM is the percentage of these students who graduated with a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation diploma and scored*: 75 or higher on the English Regents examination, and 80 or higher on a mathematics Regents examination
* Or who achieved the minimum score accepted by the Department on an approved alternative to a Regents examination (see http://www.p12.nysed.gov/apda/hsgen/archive/list.pdf).

Statewide, 74.0% of students who started 9th grade in 2008 graduated by June 2012, while 15.2% of students were still enrolled.
Transferred to GED Program, 1.0% Dropped Out, 8.4%

Still Enrolled, 15.2%

IEP Diploma, 1.3%

Graduated, 74.0%

2008 Total Cohort Students = 221,366


5

All Students in Public Schools

Statewide, 76.7% of students who started 9th grade in 2008 graduated by August 2012, while 12.5% were still enrolled.
Dropped Out 8.4% Transferred to GED Program 1.0%

Still Enrolled 12.5% IEP Diploma 1.2%

Graduated 76.7%

2008 Total Cohort Students = 221,366


6

All Students in Public Schools

For students who entered 9th grade in 2008, inclusion of August 2012 graduates increased the statewide graduation rate by more than 2 percentage points compared to the June 2012 rate
Statewide, 6,096 students earned diplomas in August 2012.
93.9% 94.7%

77.4%

78.8%

84.8%

86.5%

60.4%

64.7%

New York City

Large City

50.0%

53.5%

UrbanSuburban

65.1%

69.3%

Rural

Average

Low

Total Public

2008 Cohort through June

2008 Cohort through August

74.0%

76.7%
7

Statewide the percentage of graduates earning a Regents, Advanced Regents, or Local Diploma
12.6% 9.8% 16.2% 14.5% 4.9% 15.3% 12.2% 19.4% 17.5% 16.1% 20.3% 18.4%

48.8% 40.3% 43.7% 45.4%

54.7% 49.2% 40.4% 43.8% 45.5% 40.2% 43.6% 45.4%

43.4% 41.8% 42.0% 41.4% 40.4%

40.2% 38.8% 39.2% 38.6%

39.4% 38.1% 38.5%

20 04

20 05

20 06

20 07

20 08

20 04

20 05

20 06

20 07

20 04

20 05

Four Years
Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation

Five Years
Regents Diploma

20 06

Six Years
Local Diploma

Statewide
Percentage of Students Statewide Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma Results Through June

80.0%

78.9%

79.2%

79.7%

80.9%

2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
Cohort Membership 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 223,726 224,822 224,744 223,285 221,366

77.4%

74.0%

70.9%

Four Years

71.8%

73.4%

74.0%

Five Years

78.3%

Six Years
9

New York City


Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 Years Results Through June

61.0%

56.4%

59.0%

60.4%

60.9%

2004 Chort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort

69.4%

70.2%

66.1%

67.8%

69.2%

70.9%

73.2%

Cohort Membership 2004 2005 2006 75,009 77,378 78,346

2007
2008

79,476
79,719

Four Years

Five Years

Six Years
10

Buffalo
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 Years Results Through June
Because of a one-time change in 8th grade promotion policy, the 2005 and 2006 total cohort enrollments in Buffalo are significantly smaller and larger, respectively, than earlier cohorts. Cohort size decreased again for the 2007 Cohort.

58.0%

53.1%

54.0%

55.5%

57.0%

51.8%

47.4%

46.8%

52.1%

53.0%

2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
Cohort Membership 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 3,083 2,248 3,479 2,653 2,948

61.7%

Four Years

Five Years

62.6%

Six Years
11

* These cohorts include students enrolled for at least one day in a school or the district

Rochester
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 Years Results Through June

59.6%

57.1%

54.7%

48.4%

46.1%

42.1%

45.5%

43.4%

50.6%

53.6%

54.0%

58.0%

2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
Cohort Membership
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2,220 2,924 2,670 2,873 2,564

* * Four Years

* * Five Years

* Six Years
12

* These cohorts include students enrolled for at least one day in a school or the district

Syracuse
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 Years Results Through June

56.2%

56.4%

58.7%

56.3%

54.2%

47.3%

45.2%

45.9%

48.0%

48.4%

53.9%

55.9%

2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
Cohort Membership 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 1,506 1,528 1,571 1,673 1,547

Four Years

Five Years

Six Years
13

* These cohorts include students enrolled for at least one day in a school or the district

Yonkers
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 Years Results Through June

58.1%

58.1%

63.2%

2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
Cohort Membership 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 1,831 2,072 1,673 1,858 1,814

74.4%

71.2%

68.1%

67.4%

66.2%

* * Four Years

66.0%

* * Five Years

66.7%

* Six Years
14

* These cohorts include students enrolled for at least one day in a school or the district

68.0%

72.2%

The graduation rate for Black students


Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 Years Results Through June
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort

58.4%

54.2%

55.7%

57.7%

58.1%

64.0%

65.3%

66.8%

67.1%

68.0%

68.2%

70.2%

Cohort Membership 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 42,590 43,837 44,615 44,072 42,982 15

Four Years

Five Years

Six Years

The graduation rate for Hispanic students


Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 Years Results Through June
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort

66.2%

67.7%

58.0%

52.2%

54.8%

57.3%

57.8%

62.7%

65.0%

65.8%

67.9%

69.8%

Cohort Membership 2004 2005 40,498 42,635

2006
2007 2008

43,349
45,455 46,337 16

Four Years

Five Years

Six Years

The graduation rate of students with disabilities


Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 Years Results Through June

44.6%

41.5%

42.1%

44.1%

44.7%

2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort

52.1%

50.4%

49.5%

50.1%

51.9%

52.7%

53.3%

Cohort Membership 2004 2005 2006 2007 31,252 32,058 32,696 32,917 33,833 17

Four Years

Five Years

Six Years

2008

The graduation rate for ELL students


Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 Years Results Through June
55.5% 56.7%
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort

51.7%

51.7%

38.6%

40.3%

35.7%

38.2%

34.3%

49.2%

51.6%

53.5%

Cohort Membership 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 10,057 11,265 11,635 12,236 11,986

Four Years

Five Years

Six Years
18

The Graduation Rate for Black Students


The percentage of Black students in the cohort earning a Local, Regents or Regents with Advanced Designation Diploma
65.3% 57.7% 58.4% 58.1% 66.8% 68.0% 68.2% 70.2%

14.7% 21.7% 19.5% 23.8%

55.7%

21.6%
Cohort Membership

10.0% 15.6% 14.1%

4.4%

2005 2006 2007

43,837 44,615 44,072

30.9%

34.0%

38.9%

44.7% 34.3% 37.7%

43.6% 35.1%

38.9%

2008

42,982

9.2%

9.5%

9.5%

9.0%

9.3%

9.6%

9.7%

9.4%

9.7%

2005 2006 2007 2008


Four Years

2005 2006 2007


Five Years
Regents Diploma

2005 2006
Six Years
Local Diploma

Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation

19

The Graduation Rate for Hispanic Students


The percentage of Hispanic students in the cohort earning a Local, Regents or Regents with Advanced Designation Diploma
65.0% 57.3% 54.8% 58.0% 57.8% 66.2% 67.7% 67.9% 69.8%

13.2% 17.5% 20.7% 22.6%

19.4%
Cohort Membership 2005 2006 2007 42,635 43,349 45,455

12.4% 14.8%

8.8%

3.3%

42.4% 28.8% 33.2% 37.3% 32.8% 37.0%

42.4% 33.8%

2008

46,337

38.5%

11.3%

11.7%

11.9%

12.1%

11.5%

11.7%

12.1%

11.5%

11.8%

2005 2006 2007 2008


Four Years

2005 2006 2007


Five Years
Regents Diploma

2005 2006
Six Years
Local Diploma

20

Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation

The Graduation Rate for English Language Learners


The percentage of English Language Learner cohort members earning a Local, Regents or Regents with Advanced Designation Diploma
55.5% 51.7% 51.7% 51.6% 56.7%

38.6%

40.3%

17.2%

24.4% 28.2%

38.2% 34.3%

21.4% 25.5%

Cohort Membership

14.1% 16.9%

10.3%

2005
3.5%

11,265 11,635 12,236 11,986

2006 2007 2008

20.2% 15.9%

22.8%

25.2%

23.8% 19.6%

28.7% 20.6%

25.6%

5.9%

6.1%

5.2%

5.6%

6.6%

6.5%

5.7%

6.7%

6.7%

2005 2006 2007 2008 Four Years

2005 2006 2007 Five Years

2005 2006 Six Years


21
Local Diploma

Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation

Regents Diploma

The Graduation Rate for Students with Disabilities


The percentage of cohort members who are Students with Disabilities earning a Local, Regents or Regents with Advanced Designation Diploma
50.4% 44.1% 44.6% 42.1% 44.7% 50.1% 52.1% 52.7%

53.3%

20.0%

18.9% 20.8% 20.2%

26.1% 25.6%

25.6%

27.8% 27.9%

Cohort Membership 2005 2006 2007 2008 32,058 32,696 32,917 33,833

21.3% 22.8% 19.1% 20.2%

21.2% 21.4% 23.2%

21.7% 22.2%

3.0%

3.1%

3.1%

3.0%

3.2%

3.1%

3.2%

3.2%

3.2%

2005 2006 2007 2008


Four Years

2005 2006 2007


Five Years

2005 2006
Six Years
Local Diploma

Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation

Regents Diploma

22

The Graduation Rate for Charter Schools

Percentage of Students Graduating with a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation diploma After 4 Years

Results Through June, All Students


These rates are based on small cohort sizes. The student count of the charter schools cohort has increased to 1,628 for 2008 cohort.

43.3%

47.2%

Charters 2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort

56.0%

57.2%

64.7%

23

Aspirational Performance Measures (APMs) as a percentage of the cohort compared to the Graduation Rate percentage for students who started 9th grade in 2008 for Charter Schools
All Students After 4 Years Results Through June
There are only 1,628 students in the Charter School cohort.

64.7%

Charter Schools Graduation Rate Regents with Adv Designation ELA/Math APM

7.9%

12.7%

24

Statewide Achievement Gap Data

25

Graduation rates by credential awarded, All Public Schools


the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation, selected racial ethnic groups after 4 years 84.1%
7%

85.1%
6%

85.7%
4%

57.7% 57.3%
12%

58.4% 58.0%
34% 10% 9%

36%

58.1% 57.8%
4% 3%

40%

14%

34%

33% 43%

39%

37% 43%

45%

42%

42%

10%

12%

10%

12%

9%

12%

Black Hispanic White

Black Hispanic White

Black Hispanic White

2006

2007
Regents Diploma

2008
Local Diploma

Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation

26
The cohort graduation rate is presented at the top of each column. The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.

Big 4 District graduation rates by credential awarded


the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation, selected racial ethnic groups after 4 years

63.5% 57.1% 52.9% 45.6%


12% 10%

61.6%
4%

48.1%

48.3%
13% 12%

50.2% 45.9%
5% 36% 42% 4%

17% 17%

32% 41% 32% 31% 27% 25% 18% 13% 3% Black 5% Hispanic White 5% Black 8% Hispanic White 4% Black 6% Hispanic White 37%

15%

2006

2007
Regents Diploma

2008
Local Diploma

Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation

27
The cohort graduation rate is presented at the top of each column. The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.

Buffalo graduation rates by credential awarded


the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation, selected racial ethnic groups after 4 years 64.0% 58.3%
9%

62.7%
4%

52.4%
13%

44.6%
12%

43.7%
11% 35%

44.1%
5%

39.6%
17% 12% 37% 35% 27% 23%

35.1% 43%
4%

36% 29%

26% 19% 15% 9% 5% 9% 4% 3% Black Hispanic White

1%

1% Black Hispanic White

Black Hispanic White

2006

2007
Regents Diploma

2008
Local Diploma

Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation

28
The cohort graduation rate is presented at the top of each column. The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.

Rochester graduation rates by credential awarded


the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation, selected racial ethnic groups after 4 years

58.5% 56.1%
6% 11%

57.8%
4%

45.0%

42.4%

43.9% 43.9%
10% 11% 37%

43.4%
5%

38.1%
3% 36%

15%

13% 26%

34% 25% 24% 19% 5% 5% 4% 5% 30% 29% 31%

15% 5% 4%

18%

Black Hispanic White

Black Hispanic White

Black Hispanic White

2006

2007
Regents Diploma

2008
Local Diploma

Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation

29
The cohort graduation rate is presented at the top of each column. The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.

Syracuse graduation rates by credential awarded


the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation, selected racial ethnic groups after 4 years

57.1% 51.6% 44.3% 46.7%


11% 7% 16% 20% 4%

53.7%
11% 3%

46.4% 45.5%

32.3%
25% 14%

34.3%
9% 33% 35% 36% 38%

27% 21% 15% 15% 4% 4% 4%

19%

13% 6% 3% 7%

13%

Black Hispanic White

Black Hispanic White

Black Hispanic White

2006

2007
Regents Diploma

2008
Local Diploma

Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation

30
The cohort graduation rate is presented at the top of each column. The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.

Yonkers graduation rates by credential awarded


the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation, selected racial ethnic groups after 4 years

77.6% 70.0% 65.5% 58.6% 62.1% 13% 56.0%


22% 23% 15% 44% 42% 40% 33% 30% 22% 14% 5% 7% 7% 34% 50% 54% 16% 11%

75.1%
5%

65.0% 59.3%
6% 4%

54%

17% 9% 4% 8%

Black Hispanic White

Black Hispanic White

Black Hispanic White

2006

2007
Regents Diploma

2008
Local Diploma

Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation

31

The Graduation Rate Achievement Gap

Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning Credentials after Four Years
Positive values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was lower than for White students Negative values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was higher than for White students

33 27 27 28

34 34

33 31 28 27 27 28

32 31 30

26

5 3 0 1 0

Graduation Rate

Regents Adv Designation

Regents -3 Diploma

-5

Local -1 Diploma -4
-8 -7

Graduation Rate

Regents Adv Designation

-1 Regents -3 Diploma

Local -3 Diploma
-7 -6

Black v. White

Hispanic v. White

32
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort

The achievement gap for Black and Hispanic Students compared to White Students in New York City
The graduation rate and credentials earned achievement gap in New York City is generally similar to the statewide trend. Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning Credentials after Four Years
Positive values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was lower than for White students Negative values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was higher than for White students

25 20 20 2020

25 25 24 22 2222 22

23 23 2323

4 1 1
Graduation Rate Regents Adv Desig Regents -1 Diploma Local -1 Diploma Graduation Rate Regents Adv Desig

3 1 0 0
Local Diploma -3

Regents Diploma

-4

Black v. White

-6

-5

-4

-4

Hispanic v. White
2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort

-6

2005 Cohort

33

The achievement gap for Black and Hispanic Students compared to White Students in Buffalo City School District
As a percent of the cohort, more White Students graduated with a Regents or Advanced Designation Diploma; more Black and Hispanic Students graduated with a Local Diploma.

Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning Credentials after Four Years
Positive values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was lower than for White students Negative values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was higher than for White students

28

19 14 12 9 7 3 0
Graduation Rate Regents Adv Desig Regents Diploma Local-1 Diploma -3

18 14 11 12 10 8

19

20 1215 10 8 12 10 11 10

1
Graduation Rate Regents Adv Desig Regents Diploma

Black v. White

-5

-4

Hispanic v. White
2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort

-4

Local -2 Diploma

2005 Cohort

34

The achievement gap for Black and Hispanic Students compared to White Students in Rochester City School District
As a percent of the cohort, more White Students graduated with a Regents or Advanced Designation Diploma; more Black and Hispanic Students graduated with a Local Diploma. Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning Credentials after Four Years
Positive values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was lower than for White students Negative values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was higher than for White students

20 15 11 9 6 1
Graduation Rate Regents Adv Desig

14

14 14 11

13 11 7

14

15 13

14 11

14

8 4 2 0
Local Diploma Graduation Rate Regents Adv Desig Regents Diploma

5 2 1
Local Diploma

Regents Diploma

-4

-3

-2 -5 -4

Black v. White

-10

Hispanic v. White

35
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort

The achievement gap for Black and Hispanic Students compared to White Students in Syracuse City School District
As a percent of the cohort, more White Students graduated with a Regents or Advanced Designation Diploma; more Black and Hispanic Students graduated with a Local Diploma. Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning Credentials after Four Years
Positive values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was lower than for White students Negative values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was higher than for White students

23 19

23

15 13 10 8 7 7 4 2 11 10 10 11 9 6 8 8 6 12 10

14

Graduation Rate

Regents Adv Desig

Regents Diploma

Local Diploma

-5 -8

-4

Graduation Rate

Regents Adv Desig

Regents Diploma

Local Diploma -1

-2

-4

Black v. White

-14

Hispanic v. White

36
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort

The achievement gap for Black and Hispanic Students compared to White Students in Yonkers City School District
As a percent of the cohort, more White Students graduated with a Regents or Advanced Designation Diploma; more Black and Hispanic Students graduated with a Local Diploma. Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning Credentials after Four Years
Positive values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was lower than for White students Negative values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was higher than for White students

22

16 11

16

16 12 9 6 4 12 12 10 8 6 4 0 1
Local Diploma

13

12 10 8

13 9 9 9

Graduation Rate

Regents Adv Desig

Regents Diploma

Local Diploma -1

-2

-4

Graduation Rate

Regents Adv Desig

Regents Diploma

-2

-5

Black v. White

-10

Hispanic v. White

-9

37
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort

The Graduation Rate Achievement Gap between Black and White students for NYC, the Big 4, and Statewide
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Graduating after Four Years
(Positive values indicate the rate for Black Students was lower than for White Students)

27 22 20 20 20 20 15 12 11 9 16 14 12 9 11 8 7 19 16 15 14 10 7 11 16

26

27

28

NYC

Big 4*

Buffalo

Rochester

Syracuse

Yonkers

Total Public

Big 4* = Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse, and Yonkers combined.


2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort

38

The Graduation Rate Achievement Gap between Hispanic and White students for NYC, the Big 4, and Statewide
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Graduating after Four Years
(Positive values indicate the rate for Hispanic Students was lower than for White Students)

28 23 18 19 20 15 20 19 13 12 10 8 8 23

28

27 27

28

22 22 22 22

14 10 11 11 9 11

NYC

Big 4

Buffalo

Rochester

Syracuse

Yonkers

Total Public

2005 Cohort

2006 Cohort

2007 Cohort

2008 Cohort

39

Regents with Advanced Designation Diplomas - the gaps between Black and White students for NYC, the Big 4, and Statewide
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning a Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation after Four Years
(Positive values indicate the rate for Black Students was lower than for White Students)

33

34 34

33

25

24

25 25

16 13 11 9 7 11 11 14 12 14 14 11 13 13 11 10 10 6 9 12

NYC

Big 4

Buffalo

Rochester

Syracuse

Yonkers

Total Public

2005 Cohort

2006 Cohort

2007 Cohort

2008 Cohort

40

Regents with Advanced Designation Diplomas - the gaps between Hispanic and White students for NYC, the Big 4, and Statewide
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning a Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation after Four Years
(Positive values indicate the rate for Hispanic Students was lower than for White Students)

31

32

31

30

23 23 23 23

12 10 8 10 9 10 8 10

13

14 11

14

15 13 11 8 6 6 8 9

NYC

Big 4

Buffalo

Rochester

Syracuse

Yonkers

Total Public

2005 Cohort

2006 Cohort

2007 Cohort

2008 Cohort

41

Regents Diplomas - the gap between Black and White students for NYC, the Big 4, and Statewide
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning a Regents Diploma after Four Years
(Positive values indicate the rate for Black Students was lower than for White Students)

12 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 0
NYC Big 4 Buffalo Rochester Syracuse

12 10

9 7 6 6 4 3 2 0
Yonkers Total Public

-1 -3 -4
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort

-5

42

Regents Diplomas - the gaps between Hispanic and White students for NYC, the Big 4, and Statewide.
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning a Regents Diploma after Four Years
(Positive values indicate the rate for Hispanic Students was lower than for White Students)

15 14 12 11 10 8 7 5 4 3 2 1 0
NYC Big 4 Buffalo Rochester Syracuse Yonkers

12 10 9

5 4 4 3 2 0
Total Public

4 2 1

-1 -2
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort

43

When comparing Local Diplomas, the gap between Black and White students in NYC and the Big 4 are smaller than the gap found Statewide.
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning a Local Diploma after Four Years
(Positive values indicate the rate for Black Students was higher than for White Students)

14

10 8 6 5 4 3 5 5 4 3 4 3 2
0
NYC

10 8 5 4 4 8 7

-1

Big 4

-1

Buffalo

-1

Rochester

Syracuse

Yonkers

-1

Total Public

-1

-4 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort

44

When comparing Local Diplomas, the gap between Hispanic and White students in the Big 5 are smaller than the gap found Statewide.
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning a Local Diploma after Four Years
(Positive values indicate the rate for Hispanic Students was higher than for White Students Negative values indicate the rate for Hispanic Students was lower than for White Students)

7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
NYC Big 4 Buffalo Rochester Syracuse Yonkers

7 6 5 4 4 3 2 1 1 2 2 1 0
Total Public

4 4

-1 -2
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort

-1

2008 Cohort

45

Achievement Gap in Percentage Between English Language Learners and All Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After Four Years
Percentage Point Difference for Graduates in the Cohorts through June
40

35

36 33 33

ELL
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort

46

Achievement Gap in Percentage Between Students with Disabilities and All Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After Four Years
Percentage Point Difference for Graduates in the Cohorts through June

29

30

29

29

29

SWD
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort

47

NYC and Big Four* City School Districts


*2006 and 2007 5-year and 2007 and 2008 4-year cohorts include students enrolled for at least one day in a school or the district

48

Percentage of NYCs and Large City Districts Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4 Years
Results of Graduates in the Cohorts through June

74.0%

61.0%

52.8%

56.4%

59.0%

60.4%

50.3%

52.8%

New York City 2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort

Large City Districts* 2006 Cohort

48.2%

49.0%

50.0%

70.9%

2007 Cohort

71.8%

Total Public 2008 Cohort

73.4%

* Large City Districts include: Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse, and Yonkers

74.0%

49

Percentage of NYC and Big Four Cities Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After Four Years
Results of Graduates in the Cohorts through June
74.0% 70.9% 71.8% 73.4% 74.0%

66.2%

61.0%

60.9%

59.0%

60.4%

58.1%

56.4%

51.8%

53.1%

54.0%

48.4%

48.4%

47.4%

46.8%

46.1%

47.3%

45.5%

New York City

Buffalo 2004 Cohort

Rochester 2005 Cohort

42.1%

43.4%

Syracuse 2006 Cohort

45.2%

45.9%

48.0%

Yonkers 2008 Cohort

58.1%

63.2%

66.0%

Total Public

2007 Cohort

50

Percentage of NYC and Big Four Cities Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After Four Years
Results of Graduates in the 2008 Cohort through June and August
72.1% 64.7% 60.4% 48.6% 43.4% 48.0% 51.1% 66.0% 74.0% 76.7%

46.8% 47.8%

New York City

Buffalo

Rochester 2008 Cohort

Syracuse 2008 Cohort August

Yonkers

Total Public

51

Buffalo City School District, the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation Diploma

61.7% 58.0% 53.1% 47.4%


10.5% 14.9%

62.6%

54.0%
15.1% 11.1%

52.1%
13.0%

15.5%

53.0% Cohort Membership 2005 2,248 3,479 2,653 2,948

46.8% 4.4%

17.8%

18.4%

2006 2007 2008

35.6% 29.3%

33.5%

39.6% 36.2% 31.2%

35.5%

40.1% 31.5%

7.0%

9.5% 3.2%

6.2%

7.0%

9.5% 3.1%

7.0%

3.2%

2005 2006 2007 2008 Four Years

2005 2006 2007 Five Years

2005 2006 Six Years


Local Diploma

Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation

Regents Diploma

52

* 2006 and 2007 5-year and 2007and 2008 4-year cohorts include students enrolled for at least one day in a school or the district

Rochester City School District, the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation Diploma

54.7% 54.0% 50.6%

58.0% 53.6%

46.1% 45.5%
42.1%

43.4%

19.5% 23.4%

13.8% 25.7%

21.5%

Cohort Membership 2005 2006 2007 2008 2,924 2,670 2,873 2,564

14.4% 16.8%

9.6%

4.1%

24.9% 19.5%

30.1%

33.2% 21.4%

28.2%

34.2% 22.1%

29.6%

5.8%

6.8%

5.8%

6.1%

5.8%

6.9%

6.0%

5.8%

7.0%

2005 2006 2007 2008


Four Years

2005 2006 2007


Five Years

2005 2006
Six Years
53

Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation Regents Diploma Local Diploma * 2006 and 2007 5-year and 2007 and 2008 4-year cohorts include students enrolled for at least one day in a school or the district

Syracuse City School District, the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation Diploma
54.2% 48.4% 48.0% 45.2% 45.9%
5.2% 13.2% 15.9% 16.1% 22.1% 22.7% 18.1% 23.6% 24.0%

53.9%

56.4%

56.3%

55.9%

Cohort Membership 2005 2006 2007 2008 1,528 1,571 1,673 1,547

35.6% 27.8% 21.5% 22.3% 30.6% 24.0% 23.7% 24.4% 24.2%

7.8%

7.5%

7.5%

7.2%

8.1%

7.5%

7.7%

8.3%

7.7%

2005 2006 2007 2008


Four Years

2005 2006 2007


Five Years

2005 2006
Six Years
54

Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation Regents Diploma Local Diploma * 2006 5-year and 2007 4-year cohorts include students enrolled for at least one day in a school or the district

Yonkers City School District, the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation Diploma
74.4% 68.0%

71.2% 66.2% 63.2% 58.1% 66.0% 66.7%

72.2%

4.2% 14.4% 26.8% 25.6%

19.0% 27.9% 26.8%


2005 2006 2,072 1,673 1,858 1,814 Cohort Membership

20.3% 19.7%

53.0% 39.3% 34.7% 31.7% 34.3% 36.1%

2007

42.9% 34.4% 36.1%

2008

6.7%

8.2%

12.4%

8.9%

6.7%

8.2%

12.5% 6.7%

8.2%

2005 2006 2007 2008 Four Years

2005 2006 2007 Five Years


Regents Diploma

2005 2006
Six Years
Local Diploma

Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation

55

* 2006 and 2007 5-year and 2007 and 2008 4-year cohorts include students enrolled for at least one day in a school or the district

Graduation Rates by Need/Resource Group For Four, Five and Six Years

New York City


Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5, and 6 Years Results Through June

61.0%

60.9%

56.4%

59.0%

60.4%

2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort

70.90%

69.4%

70.2%

66.1%

67.8%

69.2%

73.2%

Cohort Membership 2004 2005 2006 75,009 77,378 78,346

2007
2008

79,476
79,719

Four Years

Five Years

Six Years
57

Large City Districts


Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5, and 6 Years Results Through June

50.3%

48.2%

49.0%

50.0%

2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort

59.8%

59.0%

58.6%

57.2%

56.7%

52.8%

56.5%

58.3%

Cohort Membership 2004 2005 2006 8,863 8,983 9,536

2007
2008

9,057
8,873

Four Years

Five Years

Six Years
58

High Need Urban-Suburban Districts


Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5, and 6 Years Results Through June

63.0% 64.5%

61.7%

2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort

72.0%

72.3%

64.5%

65.1%

70.5%

71.7%

72.1%

72.9%

73.6%

Cohort Membership 2004 2005 2006 16,739 16,964 16,666

2007
2008

16,517
16,037

Four Years

Five Years

Six Years
59

High Need Rural Districts


Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5, and 6 Years Results Through June

2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort

79.5%

80.3%

79.3%

78.8%

77.4%

73.3%

74.2%

75.4%

76.1%

77.5%

78.0%

79.0%

Cohort Membership 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 14,898 14,758 14,262 14,135 13,501

Four Years

Five Years

Six Years
60

Average Need Districts


Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5, and 6 Years Results Through June

2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort

88.1%

87.1%

85.8%

85.3%

80.4%

81.0%

83.0%

84.4%

84.8%

86.1%

86.5%

87.6%

Cohort Membership 2004 2005 2006 2007 73,488 72,316 71,230 69,517 68,042 61

Four Years

Five Years

Six Years

2008

Low Need Districts


Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5, and 6 Years Results Through June

2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort

95.7%

95.4%

95.1%

92.1%

92.1%

93.3%

93.5% 93.9%

94.8%

95.1%

95.5%

95.9%

Cohort Membership 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 33,930 33,616 33,693 33,468 33,566

Four Years

Five Years

Six Years

62

Districts Outside New York City


Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5, and 6 Years Results Through June

85.4%

84.4%

83.8%

83.9%

84.5%

85.1%

2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort

78.2%

78.6%

80.1%

81.2%

81.6%

83.2%

Cohort Membership 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 148,717 147,444 146,398 143,809 141,647

Four Years

Five Years

Six Years

63

In the districts outside of NYC, 81.6% of students who started 9th grade in 2008 graduated by June 2012, while 9.3% of students were still enrolled.
Transferred to GED Program, 1.0% Dropped Out, 6.7%

Still Enrolled, 9.3%

IEP Diploma, 1.2%

Graduated, 81.6%

All Students in Public Schools outside of NYC

2008 Total Cohort Students = 141,647


64

Results for Students by Race/Ethnicity and Gender

65

Cohort Memberships by Race/Ethnicity and Gender 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008 Cohorts All Students
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
American Indian / Alaskan Native Female American Indian / Alaskan Native Male Asian Female Asian Male 428 507 505 570 559

473

473

573

558

577

7573 8279

7757 8305

7900 8584

8185 9129

8,735 9,498

Black Female Black Male Hispanic Female Hispanic Male White Female White Male

21375 21215 20068 20430 60015 63545

22004 21833 20881 21754 58874 62029

22369 22246 21509 21840 57465 61279

21860 22212 22374 23081 55335 59396

21,374 21,608 22,490 23,847 54,381 57,467

66

Graduation Rate by Race/Ethnicity


Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After Four Years Through June

82.6%

82.4%

78.4%

80.4%

81.6%

82.0%

82.7%

84.1%

85.1%

85.7%

74.0%

59.1%

59.6%

58.5%

58.4%

58.1%

57.7%

58.0%

56.5%

56.3%

55.7%

54.2%

American Indian / Alaska Native


2004 Cohort

Asian
2005 Cohort

Black

52.2%

Hispanic
2006 Cohort

54.8%

57.3%

57.8%

White
2007 Cohort

70.9%

All Students
2008 Cohort

71.8%

73.4%

74.0%

67

Graduation Rate by Race/Ethnicity


Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma in the 2008 Cohort After Four Years Through June and August

81.6%

84.1%

85.7%

87.1%

62.6%

58.5%

61.7%

58.1%

American Indian / Alaska Native

Asian
2008 Cohort

Black

Hispanic

57.8%

62.3%

White

All Students

74.0%

76.7%

2008 Cohort Through August

68

American Indian Students Who Started 9th Grade in 2008, Results After Four Years
June 2012

Dropped Out, 13.5% Transferred to GED Program, 1.5%

Still Enrolled, 23.9%

Graduated, 58.5%

IEP Diploma, 2.4%

2008 Total Cohort Students = 1,136


69

Asian Students Who Started 9th Grade in 2008, Results After Four Years
June 2012
Transferred to GED Program, 0.2%

Dropped Out, 5.1% Still Enrolled, 12.7% IEP Diploma, 0.4%

Graduated, 81.6%

2008 Total Cohort Students = 18,233

70

Black Students Who Started 9th Grade in 2008, Results After Four Years
June 2012

Dropped Out, 12.6% Transferred to GED Program, 1.2%

Still Enrolled, 26.0%

Graduated, 58.1%

2008 Total Cohort Students = 42,982


IEP Diploma, 1.9%

71

Hispanic Students Who Started 9th Grade in 2008, Results After Four Years
June 2012

Dropped Out, 13.6% Transferred to GED Program, 1.1%

Still Enrolled, 25.8%

Graduated, 57.8%

2008 Total Cohort Students = 46,337


IEP Diploma, 1.5%

72

White Students Who Started 9th Grade in 2008, Results After Four Years
June 2012
Transferred to GED Program, 1.0% Dropped Out, 5.2% IEP Diploma, 1.1%

Still Enrolled, 6.9%

Graduated, 85.7%

2008 Total Cohort Students = 111,848

73

Graduation Rate by Gender and Race/Ethnicity


Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After Four Years Through June
83.9% 85.2% 87.0% 86.7% 85.6%

Solid colors: Females Stripes: Males


73.5% 76.0% 78.5% 78.6% 78.0%

85.5% 86.3% 87.4% 88.2% 88.7% 78.7% 79.3% 81.1% 82.3% 82.8%

64.3% 61.7% 64.6% 62.3% 62.4%

61.3% 61.9% 64.0% 64.3% 63.8%

49.5% 50.5% 54.3% 56.8% 54.6%

58.1% 60.9% 63.0% 63.2% 62.1%

American Indian / Alaska Native


Females 2004 Cohort Males 2004 Cohort

Asian
Females 2005 Cohort Males 2005 Cohort

Black

Hispanic

46.4% 49.1% 51.7% 53.0% 53.7%

47.0% 49.4% 51.2% 52.6% 52.6%

White

Females 2006 Cohort Males 2006 Cohort

Females 2007 Cohort Males 2007 Cohort

Females 2008 Cohort Males 2008 Cohort

75.5% 76.4% 77.7% 78.0% 77.8% 66.5% 67.4% 69.4% 70.2% 70.3%

All Students

74

Graduation rates through August 2012 vs. June 2012.


Percentage of Students Who Started 9th Grade in 2008 and Graduated with Regents or Local Diploma After Four Years through June and August 2012

Solid colors: Females


85 .6 % 87 .7 %

78 .0 % 80 .8 %

68 .2 %

54 .6 % 58 .1%

52 .6 % 57 .1 %

% .8 3 6

62 .1 % 66 .6 %

62 .4 % 65 .5 %

53 .7 %

% .1 8 5

American Indian / Alaska Native

White Asian Black Hispanic

Red June 2012

Blue August 2012

82 .8 % 84 .6 %

Stripes: Males

88 .7 % 89 .8 %

75

Cohort Graduation Rates After Four, Five, and Six Years for American Indian Students.
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 Years Results Through June

56.5%

56.3%

2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort

67.2%

67.1%

65.6%

59.1%

59.6%

58.5%

63.2%

64.0%

64.9%

65.7%

Cohort Membership 2004 2006 980 1,078

2007
2008

1,128
1,136

Four Years

Five Years

Six Years
76

Cohort Graduation Rates After Four, Five, and Six Years Results for Asian Students.
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 Years Results Through June
87.9% 88.1% 88.6% 85.6% 87.1% 87.2% 89.7%

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Cohort Cohort Cohort Cohort Cohort

82.6%

82.4%

78.4%

80.4%

81.6%

Cohort Membership 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 15,852 16,062 16,484 17,314 18,233 77

Four Years

Five Years

Six Years

Cohort Graduation Rates After Four, Five, and Six Years Results for White Students
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 Years Results Through June
88.3% 87.5% 86.6% 86.4% 87.1% 87.9%

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Cohort Cohort Cohort Cohort Cohort

85.7%

82.0%

82.7%

84.1%

85.1%

85.9%

Cohort Membership 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 123,560 120,903 118,744 114,731 111,848

Four Years

Five Years

Six Years
78

Results for Students with Disabilities

79

44.7% of students with disabilities statewide who started 9th grade in 2008 graduated by June 2012, while 29.5% were still enrolled.
Dropped Out, 15.6%

Transferred to GED Program, 1.7%

Graduated, 44.7%

Still Enrolled, 29.5%

IEP Diploma, 8.2%

2008 Total Cohort Students = 33,833

80

Four-year graduation rates for students with disabilities by Need/Resource Capacity


Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After Four Years Through June
75.0% 73.8% 75.3% 75.6% 36.9% 38.8% 40.7% 46.2% 46.2% 51.8% 53.0% 55.8% 57.0% 58.8% 74.8% 41.5% 42.1% 44.1% 44.6% 44.7%

22.5% 24.7% 27.9% 27.2% 27.6%

New York City

26.3% 23.0% 25.0%

Large City 2004 Cohort

28.2% 25.8%

35.1% 36.9% 39.4% 39.0% 40.4%

UrbanSuburban 2005 Cohort

Rural 2006 Cohort

Average 2007 Cohort

Low 2008 Cohort

Total Public

81

Results for English Language Learners

82

Statewide, 34.3% of ELL students who started 9th grade in 2008 had graduated by June 2012, while 40.7% were still enrolled and 21.3% had dropped out.

Dropped Out, 21.3% Graduated, 34.3% Transferred to GED Program, 1.1%

IEP Diploma, 2.4% Still Enrolled, 40.7%

2008 Total Cohort Students = 11,986


83

Graduation rates for ELL students


Cohort Membership 2004 2005 10,846 11,265

2006
2007 2008

11,635
12,236 11,986
53.9% 52% 55.8% 53.5% 47.7%

35.8% 40% 41.5% 39.4% 35.4%

42.1%

35% 40.3% 34.5% 26.8%

New York City

21.0% 30% 24.3% 26.2% 20.7%

Large City

31.6% 30% 34.4% 30.4% 28.9%

UrbanSuburban 2005 Cohort

Rural

Average

Low

2004 Cohort

2006 Cohort

2007 Cohort

2008 Cohort

35.7% 39% 40.3% 38.2% 34.3%

37.9% 35% 36.9% 38.6% 35.0%

Total Public

84

Graduation rates of ELLs compared to non-ELLs.


Percentage of students who started 9th grade in 2008 who graduated by June 2012

2008 Cohort Membership English Language Learners 11,986 Non-English Language learners 209,380

English Language Learners

34

.3

Non-English Language Learners

76

.2

85

Credentials Earned By Those Who Graduated:

Regents Diplomas vs. Local Diplomas


86

2008 Total Cohort Graduation Rate After Four Years Through June 2012 By Racial/Ethnic Group and Gender. Credentials Earned by Students Who Graduated All Students
Graduate Count: 349 315 7,475 7,405 13,631 11,356 13,977 12,811 47,570

48,263

23.2%

19.7%

17.6%

12.9%

21.6%

20.0% 52.4% 46.2%

63.4%

58.6%

71.3%

72.1%

76.5%

77.5% 73.9%

72.8% 43.8% 48.7%

35.7% 5.4%
American Indian / Alaska Native Female

39.7% 5.9%
Black Female

8.3%
American Indian / Alaska Native Male

0.9%
Asian Female

1.6%
Asian Male

9.6%
Black Male

4.5%
Hispanic Female

7.1%
Hispanic Male

3.8%
White Female

5.1%
White Male

87
Local Diploma Regents Diploma Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation

Total Cohort Graduation Rate After Four Years Through June Credentials Earned by Students Who Graduated
American Indian/ Alaska Native Students and All Students
23.2% 26.5% 19.7% 24.1%

29.8%

25.9% 29.4% 24.8%

24.9%

19.7% 44.6% 43.2% 43.5% 43.3% 42.4% 42.1% 40.3% 40.5% 39.4% 38.3%

46.2% 55.0%

55.2%

59.2% 71.3%

54.3%

61.1%

58.2%

60.6% 72.1% 38.9% 42.1% 43.9% 47.3% 53.6% 41.9% 45.4% 46.9% 50.5% 55.9%

24.0%

19.2% 15.3% 16.1% 5.4%

19.2% 19.2% 17.7%

14.5%

8.3%

16.5% 14.7% 12.6%

15.9% 9.4% 4.0% 14.3%

12.6% 10.2% 5.8%

08 20 e al lM 07 Al 20 e al lM 06 Al 20 e al 05 lM 20 Al es al 04 lM 20 Al es al 08 lM 20 Al e al em 07 lF 20 e Al al em 06 lF 20 e Al al em 05 lF 20 e Al al em 04 lF 20 e Al al em 08 20 lF Al le a M 07 N 20 /A le AI a M 06 N 20 /A le AI a M 05 N 20 /A e AI al

N /A AI

N /A AI e al

N /A AI e al

N /A AI

N /A AI

N /A AI

N /A AI

m Fe

m Fe 04 20

Local Diploma

m Fe e al 05 20

m Fe e al 06 20

m Fe e al 07 20

M e al 08 20

Regents Diploma

M 04 20

Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation

88

Total Cohort Graduation Rate After Four Years Through June Credentials Earned by Students Who Graduated
Asian Students and All Students

44.6% 43.2% 43.5% 43.3% 42.4% 42.1% 63.8% 63.0% 62.9% 64.3% 63.4% 60.7% 59.3% 60.1% 58.1% 58.6%

40.3% 40.5% 39.4% 38.3%

38.9% 42.1% 43.9% 29.7% 31.7% 33.4% 36.7%

47.3%

41.9% 45.4% 46.9% 50.5% 53.6%

55.9%

26.9% 28.6% 31.0%

31.2% 35.7%

39.7%

9.3% 8.4% 6.1% 4.6% 0.9% 9.7%

16.5% 14.7% 9.0% 6.5% 5.2% 1.6%

12.6% 9.4%

15.9% 14.3% 12.6% 4.0%

10.2%

5.8%

n ai As

08 20 es al 07 lM 20 Al es al 06 lM 20 Al es al 05 lM 20 Al es al 04 lM 20 Al es 08 al 20 lM es Al al 07 em 20 lF es Al al 06 em 20 lF es Al al em 05 lF 20 Al e al em 04 lF 20 e Al al 08 em 20 lF s e Al al M 07 n 20 ia es As al M 06 n 20 ia s le As a M 05 n 20 ia es As al 4 M 00 n 2 ia es As 08 al M 20 n s ia le a As m 07 Fe 20 n s ia le a As m 06 Fe 20 n s ia le a As m 05 20 Fe s n le ia a As m 04 Fe 20 n es ai al As m Fe
Local Diploma Regents Diploma Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation

89

Total Cohort Graduation Rate After Four Years Through June Credentials Earned by Students Who Graduated
Black Students and All Students
18.6% 17.5% 18.4% 18.0% 17.6% 15.9% 15.4% 14.1% 14.3% 12.9%

44.6% 43.2% 43.5% 43.3% 42.4% 42.1%

40.3% 40.5% 39.4% 38.3%

48.9%

49.6% 55.4% 58.0% 66.1% 76.5%

55.5% 60.3% 67.2% 77.5% 41.9% 45.4% 46.9% 50.5% 53.6%

38.9% 42.1% 43.9%

47.3%

55.9%

32.5%

34.5% 27.2% 23.5% 15.9% 5.9%

29.1% 25.6% 18.5% 9.6% 16.5% 14.7% 12.6% 9.4% 15.9% 14.3% 12.6% 4.0% 10.2% 5.8%

k ac Bl

k ac Bl es al m

k ac Bl

k ac Bl

k ac Bl

08 20 es al 07 lM 20 Al es al 06 lM 20 Al es al 05 lM 20 Al es al 04 lM 20 Al es 08 al 20 lM es Al al 07 em 20 lF es Al al 06 em 20 lF es Al al em 05 lF 20 Al e al em 04 lF 20 e Al al 08 em 20 lF es Al al M 07 k 20 ac es Bl al M 06 k 20 ac es Bl al M 05 k 20 ac s Bl le a 4 M 00 k 2 ac s Bl le 08 a 20 M es al m 07 20

k ac Bl

Fe

Fe 04 20

Local Diploma

Fe 05 20

Fe

Fe

es al m

es al m

es al m

06 20

90
Regents Diploma Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation

Total Cohort Graduation Rate After Four Years Through June Credentials Earned by Students Who Graduated
Hispanic Students and All Students
21.6% 20.5% 20.2% 21.4% 21.6% 22.0% 20.8% 20.5% 19.6% 20.0% 44.6% 43.2% 43.5% 43.3% 42.4% 42.1% 40.3% 40.5% 39.4% 38.3%

46.5% 51.6%

57.7% 64.0% 73.9%

48.2% 53.5%

58.2%

64.7% 72.8% 38.9% 42.1% 43.9% 47.3% 41.9% 45.4% 46.9% 50.5% 53.6% 55.9%

31.8%

27.9%

29.8% 22.1% 14.6% 4.5%

25.8%

21.2%

15.7% 7.1%

16.5% 14.7%

12.6% 9.4%

15.9% 14.3% 12.6% 4.0%

10.2%

5.8%

08 20 es al 07 lM 20 Al es al 06 lM 20 Al es al 05 lM 20 Al es al 04 lM 20 Al es 08 al 20 lM es Al al 07 em 20 lF es Al al 06 em 20 lF es Al al em 05 lF 20 Al e al em 04 lF 20 e 08 Al al 20 s em e al lF M 07 Al ic 20 an es sp al M Hi 06 ic 20 s an e l sp a M Hi 05 ic 20 s an e sp al M Hi 04 ic 20 an es 08 sp al M 20 Hi s ic e al an m 07 sp Fe 20 Hi ic es al an m 06 sp Fe 20 Hi s ic e al an m 05 sp Fe 20 Hi ic es al an m 04 sp Fe 20 Hi ic es al an m sp Fe Hi ic an sp Hi

91
Local Diploma Regents Diploma Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation

Total Cohort Graduation Rate After Four Years Through June Credentials Earned by Students Who Graduated
White Students and All Students

54.2% 53.3% 54.4% 54.1% 52.4%

44.6% 48.9% 47.7% 48.5% 47.6% 46.2%

43.2% 43.5% 43.3% 42.4% 42.1% 40.3% 40.5%

39.4% 38.3%

38.9% 42.1% 43.9% 36.0% 37.8% 37.9% 39.3% 40.6% 43.1% 43.0% 44.9% 48.7% 43.8%

47.3%

41.9% 45.4% 46.9% 50.5% 53.6%

55.9%

10.4% 9.2% 8.5% 9.8% 8.8% 7.8% 6.6% 7.5% 5.1% 3.8%

16.5% 14.7%

12.6% 9.4%

15.9% 14.3% 4.0%

12.6% 10.2%

5.8%

l Al

l Al

hi W te

hi W te m Fe es al

hi W te m Fe 04 20 es al

Local Diploma

hi W te m Fe 05 20 es al

hi W te m Fe 06 20 es al

hi W te M es al m Fe 07 20

Regents Diploma

hi W te M es al 08 20

hi W te M es al

hi W te M es al

hi W te es al

l Al

l Al

l Al

l Al

l Al

l Al

l Al

l Al

m Fe e al

m Fe

m Fe

m Fe

m Fe

M es al

M es al

M es al

M es al

M es al

e al

es al

es al

es al

es al

04 20

05 20

06 20

07 20

08 20

04 20

05 20

06 20

07 20

08 20

04 20

05 20

06 20

07 20

Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation

08 20

92

Diplomas Awarded to Students with Disabilities


of Total Diplomas Awarded 2005-2008 Cohorts

14.5%

12.6%

9.8%

4.9%

47.5%

47.2%

45.2%

42.3% 54.7%

43.7%

45.4%

48.8%

45.3%

45.8%

47.8%

51.1% 41.8% 42.0% 41.4% 40.4%

7.2%

7.0%

7.0%

6.6% All Students 2006 All Students 2007 All Students 2008

Students with Students with Students with Students with All Students Disabilities 2005 Disabilities 2006 Disabilities 2007 Disabilities 2008 2005

Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation

Regents Diploma

Local Diploma

93

English Language Learners by Diploma Type


of Total Diplomas Awarded 2008 Cohort

10.1%

4.7%

4.9%

54.2%

54.7%

73.5%

41.0%

40.4%

16.4%

ELL
Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation

Non-ELL
Regents Diploma

All Students
Local Diploma

94

Percentage of Total Cohort Who Received a Regents Diploma or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation after 4 Years by Need Resource Group Through June
61.2% 64% 65.4% 67.0% 71.1% 72.6% 74% 76.6% 78.7% 80.7% 84.1% 85% 87.0% 87.4% 90.9% 59.4% 61% 64.2% 66.8% 70.4%

40.9% 45% 49.2% 53.0% 57.7%

New York City

30.6% 33% 33.2% 41.1% 45.6%

Large City

Urban-Suburban 2005 Cohort

48.8% 52% 53.3% 56.3%

60.6%

Rural 2006 Cohort

Average 2007 Cohort

Low 2008 Cohort

Total Public

2004 Cohort

95

Percentage of Total Cohort Students with Disabilities Who Received a Regents Diploma or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation After Four Years Through June by Need/Resource Capacity Category
48.9% 51% 51.6% 53.4% 55.4% 27.6% 30% 31.4% 32.6% 35.2% 7.0% 9% 11.1% 12.4% 14.1%

New York City

7.6% 7% 7.7% 9.4% 7.8%

Large City

Urban-Suburban 2005 Cohort

13.1% 17% 16.7% 17.6% 18.6%

16.5% 17% 18.4% 19.9% 20.5%

Rural 2006 Cohort

Average 2007 Cohort

Low 2008 Cohort

2004 Cohort

20.6% 22% 23.3% 24.4% 25.8%

Total Public

96

Percentage of Total Cohort English Language Learners Who Received a Regents Diploma or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation After Four Years Through June by Need/Resource Capacity Category

17.7% 22% 26.9% 29.3% 32.0%

35.5% 36% 41.1% 37.1% 45.1%

New York City

6.8% 13% 10.8% 15.4% 18.8%

Large City

Urban-Suburban 2005 Cohort

Rural 2006 Cohort

Average 2007 Cohort

Low 2008 Cohort

2004 Cohort

18.5% 22% 26.3% 27.9% 30.9%

18.4% 19% 22.8% 21.3% 25.6%

21.1% 22% 22.5% 19.0% 23.2%

26.9% 23% 25.8% 27.2% 28.6%

Total Public

97

Percentage of Total Cohort Students by Racial/Ethnic Group Who Received a Regents Diploma or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation After Four Years Through June
80.6% 77.4% 78.4% 77.3% 79.1% 81.9%

71.0%

73.4%

73.7%

75.3%

54.5%

50.4%

53.7%

49.4%

45.5%

48.4%

44.2%

40.1%

43.5%

36.1%

American Indian / Alaska Native

Asian

Black

36.1%

Hispanic

40.1%

44.9%

49.3%

54.5%

White

2004 Cohort

2005 Cohort

2006 Cohort

2007 Cohort

2008 Cohort

59.4%

All Students

61.4%

64.2%

66.8%

98

70.4%

Percentage of Total Cohort American Indian/Alaska Native Students by Gender Who Received a Regents Diploma or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation After Four Years Through June
70.7% 74.7% 67.9% 65.2% 66.3% 63.0% 63.1% 60.6% 61.4% 64.2% 66.8% 70.4%

59.0%

54.7%

51.3%

49.9%

48.6%

50.1%

48.8%

44.7%

American Indian / Alaska Native Female

American Indian / Alaska Native Male

40.0%

40.8%

American Indian / Alaska Native Total

44.2%

45.5%

49.4%

50.4%

54.5%

All Female

55.8%

57.8%

All Male

59.4%

All Students

2004 Cohort

2005 Cohort

2006 Cohort

2007 Cohort

2008 Cohort

99

Percentage of Total Cohort Asian Students by Gender Who Received a Regents Diploma or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation After Four Years Through June
81.7% 82.7% 84.8% 78.0% 74.6% 76.7% 76.0% 77.4% 78.4% 80.6% 74.3% 73.4% 74.7%

71.0%

70.7%

69.1%

67.9%

66.4%

63.1% 66.3%

65.2%

63.0%

60.6%

Asian Female

Asian Male

Asian Total

All Female

55.8%

57.8%

All Male

59.4%

All Students

61.4%

64.2%

2004 Cohort

2005 Cohort

2006 Cohort

2007 Cohort

2008 Cohort

66.8%

100

70.4%

Percentage of Total Cohort Black Students by Gender Who Received a Regents Diploma or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation After Four Years Through June
70.7% 74.7% 67.9% 65.2% 66.3% 63.0% 63.1% 61.4% 64.2% 66.8% 70.4%

54.1% 60.0%

60.6%

49.0%

42.8% 47.5%

45.1%

41.3%

38.1%

Black Female

30.8%

Black Male

35.0%

36.1%

Black Total

40.1%

43.5%

48.4%

53.7%

All Female

55.8%

57.8%

All Male

2004 Cohort

2005 Cohort

2006 Total

2007 Total

2008 Total

59.4%

All Students

101

Percentage of Total Cohort Hispanic Students by Gender Who Received a Regents Diploma or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation After Four Years Through June
70.7% 74.7% 67.9% 65.2% 66.3% 63.0% 63.1% 60.6% 61.4% 64.2% 66.8% 70.4%

59.3%

54.0%

44.7% 49.9%

49.0%

43.9%

40.7%

39.6%

36.4%

Hispanic Female

32.6%

Hispanic Male

36.1%

Hispanic Total

40.1%

44.9%

49.3%

54.5%

All Female

55.8%

57.8%

All Male

2004 Cohort

2005 Cohort

2006 Cohort

2007 Cohort

2008 Cohort

59.4%

All Students

102

Percentage of Total Cohort White Students by Gender Who Received a Regents Diploma or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation After Four Years Through June
82.3% 85.4% 80.6% 78.7% 76.1% 78.6% 77.1% 75.3% 77.3% 79.1% 81.9% 74.2% 72.0% 73.7% 70.7% 74.7% 70.5% 70.4%

67.9%

65.2%

66.3%

63.0%

63.1%

60.6%

White Female

White Male

White Total

All Female

55.8%

57.8%

All Male

59.4%

All Students

61.4%

64.2%

2004 Cohort

2005 Cohort

2006 Cohort

2007 Cohort

2008 Cohort

66.8%

103

Mathematics Regents Examinations Implementation / Transition Timeline Approved by the Board of Regents 12/8/05 Mathematics A Mathematics B Algebra
Geometry

Algebra 2/ Trigonometry

2006-07

X X First admin. in June 2008

2007-08

2008-09

X Last admin. in January 2009

X First admin. in June 2009

2009-10

X Last admin. in June 2010

First admin. in June 2010 X X

2010-11

2011-12
.

104

Local Diploma Phase-Out* Timeline Requirements for Students Entering Grade 9 in:

September 2002-04

September 2005

September 2006

September 2007

September 2008

September 2009

September 2010

September 2011

Regents Examination score of 65+

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

& Regents Examination score of 55-64


Or, for students with disabilities: Regents Examination score of 55-64

1-5

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

1-5

1-5

1-5

1-5

1-5

1-5

1-5

1-5

Regents Competency Tests

1-6

1-6

1-6

1-6

1-6

1-6

1-6

N/A

* The local diploma option remains for general education students who pass three Regents examinations with a score of 65 or above and two Regents examinations through an appeals process. In addition, students with disabilities who first enter grade 9 in September 2005 or later and earn a Regents examination score between 55 and 64 continue to be eligible for a local diploma. Students with disabilities who first enter grade 9 no later than the 2010-11 school year, but fail any of the five required Regents examinations, may earn a local diploma by passing the . corresponding Regents Competency Test.

105

Graduation Rate Release: 2008 Cohort through June/August 2012


Students excluded from a school/district cohort: Transferred to a different New York public school, nonpublic school, or a school outside New York Transferred to home-schooling Transferred to a postsecondary school prior to earning a diploma Transferred outside district by court order to a program that provide access to a regular high school diploma Left the United States Deceased

106

Graduation Rate Release: 2008 Cohort through June/August 2012


Graduation Rate equals the number of students in the 2008 cohort who earned a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation diploma divided by the total number of students in the 2008 cohort
Students who earn GED or IEP diplomas cannot be included as graduates for graduation rate reporting purposes*

* See federal guidance at http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/hsgrguidance.pdf

107

Required Documentation for Removal from the Cohort


Transfer: Written request for a transcript from the receiving school, a record of sending a transcript to the receiving school, written acknowledgement from the receiving school that the student has registered, written notice of the intent to instruct at home, copy of post-secondary admission notification and schedule of courses taken, or a copy of the court order placing student out of district.

Left the United States: Written statement from a parent or guardian indicating a destination or written documentation from a school administrator of a conversation had with the students parent indicating that the family is leaving the country, which the administrator includes in the students file.
See federal guidance at http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/hsgrguidance.pdf

108

Graduation Rates:
Students Who Started 9th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008

Supplemental Packet

109

You might also like