Supplemental Grad Rate Slides
Supplemental Grad Rate Slides
Supplemental Grad Rate Slides
Students Who Started 9th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008
Supplemental Packet
Statewide, 74.0% of students who started 9th grade in 2008 graduated by June 2012, while 15.2% of students were still enrolled.
Transferred to GED Program, 1.0% Dropped Out, 8.4%
Graduated, 74.0%
Statewide, 76.7% of students who started 9th grade in 2008 graduated by August 2012, while 12.5% were still enrolled.
Dropped Out 8.4% Transferred to GED Program 1.0%
Graduated 76.7%
For students who entered 9th grade in 2008, inclusion of August 2012 graduates increased the statewide graduation rate by more than 2 percentage points compared to the June 2012 rate
Statewide, 6,096 students earned diplomas in August 2012.
93.9% 94.7%
77.4%
78.8%
84.8%
86.5%
60.4%
64.7%
Large City
50.0%
53.5%
UrbanSuburban
65.1%
69.3%
Rural
Average
Low
Total Public
74.0%
76.7%
7
Statewide the percentage of graduates earning a Regents, Advanced Regents, or Local Diploma
12.6% 9.8% 16.2% 14.5% 4.9% 15.3% 12.2% 19.4% 17.5% 16.1% 20.3% 18.4%
20 04
20 05
20 06
20 07
20 08
20 04
20 05
20 06
20 07
20 04
20 05
Four Years
Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation
Five Years
Regents Diploma
20 06
Six Years
Local Diploma
Statewide
Percentage of Students Statewide Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma Results Through June
80.0%
78.9%
79.2%
79.7%
80.9%
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
Cohort Membership 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 223,726 224,822 224,744 223,285 221,366
77.4%
74.0%
70.9%
Four Years
71.8%
73.4%
74.0%
Five Years
78.3%
Six Years
9
61.0%
56.4%
59.0%
60.4%
60.9%
2004 Chort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
69.4%
70.2%
66.1%
67.8%
69.2%
70.9%
73.2%
2007
2008
79,476
79,719
Four Years
Five Years
Six Years
10
Buffalo
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 Years Results Through June
Because of a one-time change in 8th grade promotion policy, the 2005 and 2006 total cohort enrollments in Buffalo are significantly smaller and larger, respectively, than earlier cohorts. Cohort size decreased again for the 2007 Cohort.
58.0%
53.1%
54.0%
55.5%
57.0%
51.8%
47.4%
46.8%
52.1%
53.0%
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
Cohort Membership 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 3,083 2,248 3,479 2,653 2,948
61.7%
Four Years
Five Years
62.6%
Six Years
11
* These cohorts include students enrolled for at least one day in a school or the district
Rochester
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 Years Results Through June
59.6%
57.1%
54.7%
48.4%
46.1%
42.1%
45.5%
43.4%
50.6%
53.6%
54.0%
58.0%
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
Cohort Membership
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2,220 2,924 2,670 2,873 2,564
* * Four Years
* * Five Years
* Six Years
12
* These cohorts include students enrolled for at least one day in a school or the district
Syracuse
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 Years Results Through June
56.2%
56.4%
58.7%
56.3%
54.2%
47.3%
45.2%
45.9%
48.0%
48.4%
53.9%
55.9%
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
Cohort Membership 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 1,506 1,528 1,571 1,673 1,547
Four Years
Five Years
Six Years
13
* These cohorts include students enrolled for at least one day in a school or the district
Yonkers
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 Years Results Through June
58.1%
58.1%
63.2%
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
Cohort Membership 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 1,831 2,072 1,673 1,858 1,814
74.4%
71.2%
68.1%
67.4%
66.2%
* * Four Years
66.0%
* * Five Years
66.7%
* Six Years
14
* These cohorts include students enrolled for at least one day in a school or the district
68.0%
72.2%
58.4%
54.2%
55.7%
57.7%
58.1%
64.0%
65.3%
66.8%
67.1%
68.0%
68.2%
70.2%
Cohort Membership 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 42,590 43,837 44,615 44,072 42,982 15
Four Years
Five Years
Six Years
66.2%
67.7%
58.0%
52.2%
54.8%
57.3%
57.8%
62.7%
65.0%
65.8%
67.9%
69.8%
2006
2007 2008
43,349
45,455 46,337 16
Four Years
Five Years
Six Years
44.6%
41.5%
42.1%
44.1%
44.7%
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
52.1%
50.4%
49.5%
50.1%
51.9%
52.7%
53.3%
Cohort Membership 2004 2005 2006 2007 31,252 32,058 32,696 32,917 33,833 17
Four Years
Five Years
Six Years
2008
51.7%
51.7%
38.6%
40.3%
35.7%
38.2%
34.3%
49.2%
51.6%
53.5%
Cohort Membership 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 10,057 11,265 11,635 12,236 11,986
Four Years
Five Years
Six Years
18
55.7%
21.6%
Cohort Membership
4.4%
30.9%
34.0%
38.9%
43.6% 35.1%
38.9%
2008
42,982
9.2%
9.5%
9.5%
9.0%
9.3%
9.6%
9.7%
9.4%
9.7%
2005 2006
Six Years
Local Diploma
19
19.4%
Cohort Membership 2005 2006 2007 42,635 43,349 45,455
12.4% 14.8%
8.8%
3.3%
42.4% 33.8%
2008
46,337
38.5%
11.3%
11.7%
11.9%
12.1%
11.5%
11.7%
12.1%
11.5%
11.8%
2005 2006
Six Years
Local Diploma
20
38.6%
40.3%
17.2%
24.4% 28.2%
38.2% 34.3%
21.4% 25.5%
Cohort Membership
14.1% 16.9%
10.3%
2005
3.5%
20.2% 15.9%
22.8%
25.2%
23.8% 19.6%
28.7% 20.6%
25.6%
5.9%
6.1%
5.2%
5.6%
6.6%
6.5%
5.7%
6.7%
6.7%
Regents Diploma
53.3%
20.0%
26.1% 25.6%
25.6%
27.8% 27.9%
Cohort Membership 2005 2006 2007 2008 32,058 32,696 32,917 33,833
21.7% 22.2%
3.0%
3.1%
3.1%
3.0%
3.2%
3.1%
3.2%
3.2%
3.2%
2005 2006
Six Years
Local Diploma
Regents Diploma
22
Percentage of Students Graduating with a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation diploma After 4 Years
43.3%
47.2%
Charters 2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
56.0%
57.2%
64.7%
23
Aspirational Performance Measures (APMs) as a percentage of the cohort compared to the Graduation Rate percentage for students who started 9th grade in 2008 for Charter Schools
All Students After 4 Years Results Through June
There are only 1,628 students in the Charter School cohort.
64.7%
Charter Schools Graduation Rate Regents with Adv Designation ELA/Math APM
7.9%
12.7%
24
25
85.1%
6%
85.7%
4%
57.7% 57.3%
12%
58.4% 58.0%
34% 10% 9%
36%
58.1% 57.8%
4% 3%
40%
14%
34%
33% 43%
39%
37% 43%
45%
42%
42%
10%
12%
10%
12%
9%
12%
2006
2007
Regents Diploma
2008
Local Diploma
26
The cohort graduation rate is presented at the top of each column. The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.
61.6%
4%
48.1%
48.3%
13% 12%
50.2% 45.9%
5% 36% 42% 4%
17% 17%
32% 41% 32% 31% 27% 25% 18% 13% 3% Black 5% Hispanic White 5% Black 8% Hispanic White 4% Black 6% Hispanic White 37%
15%
2006
2007
Regents Diploma
2008
Local Diploma
27
The cohort graduation rate is presented at the top of each column. The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.
62.7%
4%
52.4%
13%
44.6%
12%
43.7%
11% 35%
44.1%
5%
39.6%
17% 12% 37% 35% 27% 23%
35.1% 43%
4%
36% 29%
1%
2006
2007
Regents Diploma
2008
Local Diploma
28
The cohort graduation rate is presented at the top of each column. The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.
58.5% 56.1%
6% 11%
57.8%
4%
45.0%
42.4%
43.9% 43.9%
10% 11% 37%
43.4%
5%
38.1%
3% 36%
15%
13% 26%
15% 5% 4%
18%
2006
2007
Regents Diploma
2008
Local Diploma
29
The cohort graduation rate is presented at the top of each column. The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.
53.7%
11% 3%
46.4% 45.5%
32.3%
25% 14%
34.3%
9% 33% 35% 36% 38%
19%
13% 6% 3% 7%
13%
2006
2007
Regents Diploma
2008
Local Diploma
30
The cohort graduation rate is presented at the top of each column. The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.
75.1%
5%
65.0% 59.3%
6% 4%
54%
17% 9% 4% 8%
2006
2007
Regents Diploma
2008
Local Diploma
31
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning Credentials after Four Years
Positive values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was lower than for White students Negative values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was higher than for White students
33 27 27 28
34 34
33 31 28 27 27 28
32 31 30
26
5 3 0 1 0
Graduation Rate
Regents -3 Diploma
-5
Local -1 Diploma -4
-8 -7
Graduation Rate
-1 Regents -3 Diploma
Local -3 Diploma
-7 -6
Black v. White
Hispanic v. White
32
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
The achievement gap for Black and Hispanic Students compared to White Students in New York City
The graduation rate and credentials earned achievement gap in New York City is generally similar to the statewide trend. Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning Credentials after Four Years
Positive values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was lower than for White students Negative values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was higher than for White students
25 20 20 2020
25 25 24 22 2222 22
23 23 2323
4 1 1
Graduation Rate Regents Adv Desig Regents -1 Diploma Local -1 Diploma Graduation Rate Regents Adv Desig
3 1 0 0
Local Diploma -3
Regents Diploma
-4
Black v. White
-6
-5
-4
-4
Hispanic v. White
2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
-6
2005 Cohort
33
The achievement gap for Black and Hispanic Students compared to White Students in Buffalo City School District
As a percent of the cohort, more White Students graduated with a Regents or Advanced Designation Diploma; more Black and Hispanic Students graduated with a Local Diploma.
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning Credentials after Four Years
Positive values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was lower than for White students Negative values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was higher than for White students
28
19 14 12 9 7 3 0
Graduation Rate Regents Adv Desig Regents Diploma Local-1 Diploma -3
18 14 11 12 10 8
19
20 1215 10 8 12 10 11 10
1
Graduation Rate Regents Adv Desig Regents Diploma
Black v. White
-5
-4
Hispanic v. White
2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
-4
Local -2 Diploma
2005 Cohort
34
The achievement gap for Black and Hispanic Students compared to White Students in Rochester City School District
As a percent of the cohort, more White Students graduated with a Regents or Advanced Designation Diploma; more Black and Hispanic Students graduated with a Local Diploma. Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning Credentials after Four Years
Positive values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was lower than for White students Negative values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was higher than for White students
20 15 11 9 6 1
Graduation Rate Regents Adv Desig
14
14 14 11
13 11 7
14
15 13
14 11
14
8 4 2 0
Local Diploma Graduation Rate Regents Adv Desig Regents Diploma
5 2 1
Local Diploma
Regents Diploma
-4
-3
-2 -5 -4
Black v. White
-10
Hispanic v. White
35
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
The achievement gap for Black and Hispanic Students compared to White Students in Syracuse City School District
As a percent of the cohort, more White Students graduated with a Regents or Advanced Designation Diploma; more Black and Hispanic Students graduated with a Local Diploma. Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning Credentials after Four Years
Positive values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was lower than for White students Negative values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was higher than for White students
23 19
23
15 13 10 8 7 7 4 2 11 10 10 11 9 6 8 8 6 12 10
14
Graduation Rate
Regents Diploma
Local Diploma
-5 -8
-4
Graduation Rate
Regents Diploma
Local Diploma -1
-2
-4
Black v. White
-14
Hispanic v. White
36
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
The achievement gap for Black and Hispanic Students compared to White Students in Yonkers City School District
As a percent of the cohort, more White Students graduated with a Regents or Advanced Designation Diploma; more Black and Hispanic Students graduated with a Local Diploma. Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning Credentials after Four Years
Positive values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was lower than for White students Negative values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was higher than for White students
22
16 11
16
16 12 9 6 4 12 12 10 8 6 4 0 1
Local Diploma
13
12 10 8
13 9 9 9
Graduation Rate
Regents Diploma
Local Diploma -1
-2
-4
Graduation Rate
Regents Diploma
-2
-5
Black v. White
-10
Hispanic v. White
-9
37
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
The Graduation Rate Achievement Gap between Black and White students for NYC, the Big 4, and Statewide
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Graduating after Four Years
(Positive values indicate the rate for Black Students was lower than for White Students)
27 22 20 20 20 20 15 12 11 9 16 14 12 9 11 8 7 19 16 15 14 10 7 11 16
26
27
28
NYC
Big 4*
Buffalo
Rochester
Syracuse
Yonkers
Total Public
38
The Graduation Rate Achievement Gap between Hispanic and White students for NYC, the Big 4, and Statewide
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Graduating after Four Years
(Positive values indicate the rate for Hispanic Students was lower than for White Students)
28 23 18 19 20 15 20 19 13 12 10 8 8 23
28
27 27
28
22 22 22 22
14 10 11 11 9 11
NYC
Big 4
Buffalo
Rochester
Syracuse
Yonkers
Total Public
2005 Cohort
2006 Cohort
2007 Cohort
2008 Cohort
39
Regents with Advanced Designation Diplomas - the gaps between Black and White students for NYC, the Big 4, and Statewide
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning a Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation after Four Years
(Positive values indicate the rate for Black Students was lower than for White Students)
33
34 34
33
25
24
25 25
16 13 11 9 7 11 11 14 12 14 14 11 13 13 11 10 10 6 9 12
NYC
Big 4
Buffalo
Rochester
Syracuse
Yonkers
Total Public
2005 Cohort
2006 Cohort
2007 Cohort
2008 Cohort
40
Regents with Advanced Designation Diplomas - the gaps between Hispanic and White students for NYC, the Big 4, and Statewide
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning a Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation after Four Years
(Positive values indicate the rate for Hispanic Students was lower than for White Students)
31
32
31
30
23 23 23 23
12 10 8 10 9 10 8 10
13
14 11
14
15 13 11 8 6 6 8 9
NYC
Big 4
Buffalo
Rochester
Syracuse
Yonkers
Total Public
2005 Cohort
2006 Cohort
2007 Cohort
2008 Cohort
41
Regents Diplomas - the gap between Black and White students for NYC, the Big 4, and Statewide
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning a Regents Diploma after Four Years
(Positive values indicate the rate for Black Students was lower than for White Students)
12 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 0
NYC Big 4 Buffalo Rochester Syracuse
12 10
9 7 6 6 4 3 2 0
Yonkers Total Public
-1 -3 -4
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
-5
42
Regents Diplomas - the gaps between Hispanic and White students for NYC, the Big 4, and Statewide.
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning a Regents Diploma after Four Years
(Positive values indicate the rate for Hispanic Students was lower than for White Students)
15 14 12 11 10 8 7 5 4 3 2 1 0
NYC Big 4 Buffalo Rochester Syracuse Yonkers
12 10 9
5 4 4 3 2 0
Total Public
4 2 1
-1 -2
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
43
When comparing Local Diplomas, the gap between Black and White students in NYC and the Big 4 are smaller than the gap found Statewide.
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning a Local Diploma after Four Years
(Positive values indicate the rate for Black Students was higher than for White Students)
14
10 8 6 5 4 3 5 5 4 3 4 3 2
0
NYC
10 8 5 4 4 8 7
-1
Big 4
-1
Buffalo
-1
Rochester
Syracuse
Yonkers
-1
Total Public
-1
44
When comparing Local Diplomas, the gap between Hispanic and White students in the Big 5 are smaller than the gap found Statewide.
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning a Local Diploma after Four Years
(Positive values indicate the rate for Hispanic Students was higher than for White Students Negative values indicate the rate for Hispanic Students was lower than for White Students)
7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
NYC Big 4 Buffalo Rochester Syracuse Yonkers
7 6 5 4 4 3 2 1 1 2 2 1 0
Total Public
4 4
-1 -2
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort
-1
2008 Cohort
45
Achievement Gap in Percentage Between English Language Learners and All Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After Four Years
Percentage Point Difference for Graduates in the Cohorts through June
40
35
36 33 33
ELL
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
46
Achievement Gap in Percentage Between Students with Disabilities and All Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After Four Years
Percentage Point Difference for Graduates in the Cohorts through June
29
30
29
29
29
SWD
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
47
48
Percentage of NYCs and Large City Districts Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4 Years
Results of Graduates in the Cohorts through June
74.0%
61.0%
52.8%
56.4%
59.0%
60.4%
50.3%
52.8%
48.2%
49.0%
50.0%
70.9%
2007 Cohort
71.8%
73.4%
74.0%
49
Percentage of NYC and Big Four Cities Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After Four Years
Results of Graduates in the Cohorts through June
74.0% 70.9% 71.8% 73.4% 74.0%
66.2%
61.0%
60.9%
59.0%
60.4%
58.1%
56.4%
51.8%
53.1%
54.0%
48.4%
48.4%
47.4%
46.8%
46.1%
47.3%
45.5%
42.1%
43.4%
45.2%
45.9%
48.0%
58.1%
63.2%
66.0%
Total Public
2007 Cohort
50
Percentage of NYC and Big Four Cities Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After Four Years
Results of Graduates in the 2008 Cohort through June and August
72.1% 64.7% 60.4% 48.6% 43.4% 48.0% 51.1% 66.0% 74.0% 76.7%
46.8% 47.8%
Buffalo
Yonkers
Total Public
51
Buffalo City School District, the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation Diploma
62.6%
54.0%
15.1% 11.1%
52.1%
13.0%
15.5%
46.8% 4.4%
17.8%
18.4%
35.6% 29.3%
33.5%
35.5%
40.1% 31.5%
7.0%
9.5% 3.2%
6.2%
7.0%
9.5% 3.1%
7.0%
3.2%
Regents Diploma
52
* 2006 and 2007 5-year and 2007and 2008 4-year cohorts include students enrolled for at least one day in a school or the district
Rochester City School District, the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation Diploma
58.0% 53.6%
46.1% 45.5%
42.1%
43.4%
19.5% 23.4%
13.8% 25.7%
21.5%
Cohort Membership 2005 2006 2007 2008 2,924 2,670 2,873 2,564
14.4% 16.8%
9.6%
4.1%
24.9% 19.5%
30.1%
33.2% 21.4%
28.2%
34.2% 22.1%
29.6%
5.8%
6.8%
5.8%
6.1%
5.8%
6.9%
6.0%
5.8%
7.0%
2005 2006
Six Years
53
Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation Regents Diploma Local Diploma * 2006 and 2007 5-year and 2007 and 2008 4-year cohorts include students enrolled for at least one day in a school or the district
Syracuse City School District, the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation Diploma
54.2% 48.4% 48.0% 45.2% 45.9%
5.2% 13.2% 15.9% 16.1% 22.1% 22.7% 18.1% 23.6% 24.0%
53.9%
56.4%
56.3%
55.9%
Cohort Membership 2005 2006 2007 2008 1,528 1,571 1,673 1,547
7.8%
7.5%
7.5%
7.2%
8.1%
7.5%
7.7%
8.3%
7.7%
2005 2006
Six Years
54
Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation Regents Diploma Local Diploma * 2006 5-year and 2007 4-year cohorts include students enrolled for at least one day in a school or the district
Yonkers City School District, the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation Diploma
74.4% 68.0%
72.2%
20.3% 19.7%
2007
2008
6.7%
8.2%
12.4%
8.9%
6.7%
8.2%
12.5% 6.7%
8.2%
2005 2006
Six Years
Local Diploma
55
* 2006 and 2007 5-year and 2007 and 2008 4-year cohorts include students enrolled for at least one day in a school or the district
Graduation Rates by Need/Resource Group For Four, Five and Six Years
61.0%
60.9%
56.4%
59.0%
60.4%
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
70.90%
69.4%
70.2%
66.1%
67.8%
69.2%
73.2%
2007
2008
79,476
79,719
Four Years
Five Years
Six Years
57
50.3%
48.2%
49.0%
50.0%
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
59.8%
59.0%
58.6%
57.2%
56.7%
52.8%
56.5%
58.3%
2007
2008
9,057
8,873
Four Years
Five Years
Six Years
58
63.0% 64.5%
61.7%
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
72.0%
72.3%
64.5%
65.1%
70.5%
71.7%
72.1%
72.9%
73.6%
2007
2008
16,517
16,037
Four Years
Five Years
Six Years
59
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
79.5%
80.3%
79.3%
78.8%
77.4%
73.3%
74.2%
75.4%
76.1%
77.5%
78.0%
79.0%
Cohort Membership 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 14,898 14,758 14,262 14,135 13,501
Four Years
Five Years
Six Years
60
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
88.1%
87.1%
85.8%
85.3%
80.4%
81.0%
83.0%
84.4%
84.8%
86.1%
86.5%
87.6%
Cohort Membership 2004 2005 2006 2007 73,488 72,316 71,230 69,517 68,042 61
Four Years
Five Years
Six Years
2008
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
95.7%
95.4%
95.1%
92.1%
92.1%
93.3%
93.5% 93.9%
94.8%
95.1%
95.5%
95.9%
Cohort Membership 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 33,930 33,616 33,693 33,468 33,566
Four Years
Five Years
Six Years
62
85.4%
84.4%
83.8%
83.9%
84.5%
85.1%
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
78.2%
78.6%
80.1%
81.2%
81.6%
83.2%
Cohort Membership 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 148,717 147,444 146,398 143,809 141,647
Four Years
Five Years
Six Years
63
In the districts outside of NYC, 81.6% of students who started 9th grade in 2008 graduated by June 2012, while 9.3% of students were still enrolled.
Transferred to GED Program, 1.0% Dropped Out, 6.7%
Graduated, 81.6%
65
Cohort Memberships by Race/Ethnicity and Gender 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008 Cohorts All Students
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
American Indian / Alaskan Native Female American Indian / Alaskan Native Male Asian Female Asian Male 428 507 505 570 559
473
473
573
558
577
7573 8279
7757 8305
7900 8584
8185 9129
8,735 9,498
Black Female Black Male Hispanic Female Hispanic Male White Female White Male
66
82.6%
82.4%
78.4%
80.4%
81.6%
82.0%
82.7%
84.1%
85.1%
85.7%
74.0%
59.1%
59.6%
58.5%
58.4%
58.1%
57.7%
58.0%
56.5%
56.3%
55.7%
54.2%
Asian
2005 Cohort
Black
52.2%
Hispanic
2006 Cohort
54.8%
57.3%
57.8%
White
2007 Cohort
70.9%
All Students
2008 Cohort
71.8%
73.4%
74.0%
67
81.6%
84.1%
85.7%
87.1%
62.6%
58.5%
61.7%
58.1%
Asian
2008 Cohort
Black
Hispanic
57.8%
62.3%
White
All Students
74.0%
76.7%
68
American Indian Students Who Started 9th Grade in 2008, Results After Four Years
June 2012
Graduated, 58.5%
Asian Students Who Started 9th Grade in 2008, Results After Four Years
June 2012
Transferred to GED Program, 0.2%
Graduated, 81.6%
70
Black Students Who Started 9th Grade in 2008, Results After Four Years
June 2012
Graduated, 58.1%
71
Hispanic Students Who Started 9th Grade in 2008, Results After Four Years
June 2012
Graduated, 57.8%
72
White Students Who Started 9th Grade in 2008, Results After Four Years
June 2012
Transferred to GED Program, 1.0% Dropped Out, 5.2% IEP Diploma, 1.1%
Graduated, 85.7%
73
85.5% 86.3% 87.4% 88.2% 88.7% 78.7% 79.3% 81.1% 82.3% 82.8%
Asian
Females 2005 Cohort Males 2005 Cohort
Black
Hispanic
White
75.5% 76.4% 77.7% 78.0% 77.8% 66.5% 67.4% 69.4% 70.2% 70.3%
All Students
74
78 .0 % 80 .8 %
68 .2 %
54 .6 % 58 .1%
52 .6 % 57 .1 %
% .8 3 6
62 .1 % 66 .6 %
62 .4 % 65 .5 %
53 .7 %
% .1 8 5
82 .8 % 84 .6 %
Stripes: Males
88 .7 % 89 .8 %
75
Cohort Graduation Rates After Four, Five, and Six Years for American Indian Students.
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 Years Results Through June
56.5%
56.3%
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
67.2%
67.1%
65.6%
59.1%
59.6%
58.5%
63.2%
64.0%
64.9%
65.7%
2007
2008
1,128
1,136
Four Years
Five Years
Six Years
76
Cohort Graduation Rates After Four, Five, and Six Years Results for Asian Students.
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 Years Results Through June
87.9% 88.1% 88.6% 85.6% 87.1% 87.2% 89.7%
82.6%
82.4%
78.4%
80.4%
81.6%
Cohort Membership 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 15,852 16,062 16,484 17,314 18,233 77
Four Years
Five Years
Six Years
Cohort Graduation Rates After Four, Five, and Six Years Results for White Students
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 Years Results Through June
88.3% 87.5% 86.6% 86.4% 87.1% 87.9%
85.7%
82.0%
82.7%
84.1%
85.1%
85.9%
Cohort Membership 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 123,560 120,903 118,744 114,731 111,848
Four Years
Five Years
Six Years
78
79
44.7% of students with disabilities statewide who started 9th grade in 2008 graduated by June 2012, while 29.5% were still enrolled.
Dropped Out, 15.6%
Graduated, 44.7%
80
28.2% 25.8%
Total Public
81
82
Statewide, 34.3% of ELL students who started 9th grade in 2008 had graduated by June 2012, while 40.7% were still enrolled and 21.3% had dropped out.
2006
2007 2008
11,635
12,236 11,986
53.9% 52% 55.8% 53.5% 47.7%
42.1%
Large City
Rural
Average
Low
2004 Cohort
2006 Cohort
2007 Cohort
2008 Cohort
Total Public
84
2008 Cohort Membership English Language Learners 11,986 Non-English Language learners 209,380
34
.3
76
.2
85
2008 Total Cohort Graduation Rate After Four Years Through June 2012 By Racial/Ethnic Group and Gender. Credentials Earned by Students Who Graduated All Students
Graduate Count: 349 315 7,475 7,405 13,631 11,356 13,977 12,811 47,570
48,263
23.2%
19.7%
17.6%
12.9%
21.6%
63.4%
58.6%
71.3%
72.1%
76.5%
77.5% 73.9%
35.7% 5.4%
American Indian / Alaska Native Female
39.7% 5.9%
Black Female
8.3%
American Indian / Alaska Native Male
0.9%
Asian Female
1.6%
Asian Male
9.6%
Black Male
4.5%
Hispanic Female
7.1%
Hispanic Male
3.8%
White Female
5.1%
White Male
87
Local Diploma Regents Diploma Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation
Total Cohort Graduation Rate After Four Years Through June Credentials Earned by Students Who Graduated
American Indian/ Alaska Native Students and All Students
23.2% 26.5% 19.7% 24.1%
29.8%
24.9%
19.7% 44.6% 43.2% 43.5% 43.3% 42.4% 42.1% 40.3% 40.5% 39.4% 38.3%
46.2% 55.0%
55.2%
59.2% 71.3%
54.3%
61.1%
58.2%
60.6% 72.1% 38.9% 42.1% 43.9% 47.3% 53.6% 41.9% 45.4% 46.9% 50.5% 55.9%
24.0%
14.5%
8.3%
08 20 e al lM 07 Al 20 e al lM 06 Al 20 e al 05 lM 20 Al es al 04 lM 20 Al es al 08 lM 20 Al e al em 07 lF 20 e Al al em 06 lF 20 e Al al em 05 lF 20 e Al al em 04 lF 20 e Al al em 08 20 lF Al le a M 07 N 20 /A le AI a M 06 N 20 /A le AI a M 05 N 20 /A e AI al
N /A AI
N /A AI e al
N /A AI e al
N /A AI
N /A AI
N /A AI
N /A AI
m Fe
m Fe 04 20
Local Diploma
m Fe e al 05 20
m Fe e al 06 20
m Fe e al 07 20
M e al 08 20
Regents Diploma
M 04 20
88
Total Cohort Graduation Rate After Four Years Through June Credentials Earned by Students Who Graduated
Asian Students and All Students
44.6% 43.2% 43.5% 43.3% 42.4% 42.1% 63.8% 63.0% 62.9% 64.3% 63.4% 60.7% 59.3% 60.1% 58.1% 58.6%
47.3%
55.9%
31.2% 35.7%
39.7%
12.6% 9.4%
10.2%
5.8%
n ai As
08 20 es al 07 lM 20 Al es al 06 lM 20 Al es al 05 lM 20 Al es al 04 lM 20 Al es 08 al 20 lM es Al al 07 em 20 lF es Al al 06 em 20 lF es Al al em 05 lF 20 Al e al em 04 lF 20 e Al al 08 em 20 lF s e Al al M 07 n 20 ia es As al M 06 n 20 ia s le As a M 05 n 20 ia es As al 4 M 00 n 2 ia es As 08 al M 20 n s ia le a As m 07 Fe 20 n s ia le a As m 06 Fe 20 n s ia le a As m 05 20 Fe s n le ia a As m 04 Fe 20 n es ai al As m Fe
Local Diploma Regents Diploma Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation
89
Total Cohort Graduation Rate After Four Years Through June Credentials Earned by Students Who Graduated
Black Students and All Students
18.6% 17.5% 18.4% 18.0% 17.6% 15.9% 15.4% 14.1% 14.3% 12.9%
48.9%
47.3%
55.9%
32.5%
29.1% 25.6% 18.5% 9.6% 16.5% 14.7% 12.6% 9.4% 15.9% 14.3% 12.6% 4.0% 10.2% 5.8%
k ac Bl
k ac Bl es al m
k ac Bl
k ac Bl
k ac Bl
08 20 es al 07 lM 20 Al es al 06 lM 20 Al es al 05 lM 20 Al es al 04 lM 20 Al es 08 al 20 lM es Al al 07 em 20 lF es Al al 06 em 20 lF es Al al em 05 lF 20 Al e al em 04 lF 20 e Al al 08 em 20 lF es Al al M 07 k 20 ac es Bl al M 06 k 20 ac es Bl al M 05 k 20 ac s Bl le a 4 M 00 k 2 ac s Bl le 08 a 20 M es al m 07 20
k ac Bl
Fe
Fe 04 20
Local Diploma
Fe 05 20
Fe
Fe
es al m
es al m
es al m
06 20
90
Regents Diploma Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation
Total Cohort Graduation Rate After Four Years Through June Credentials Earned by Students Who Graduated
Hispanic Students and All Students
21.6% 20.5% 20.2% 21.4% 21.6% 22.0% 20.8% 20.5% 19.6% 20.0% 44.6% 43.2% 43.5% 43.3% 42.4% 42.1% 40.3% 40.5% 39.4% 38.3%
46.5% 51.6%
48.2% 53.5%
58.2%
64.7% 72.8% 38.9% 42.1% 43.9% 47.3% 41.9% 45.4% 46.9% 50.5% 53.6% 55.9%
31.8%
27.9%
25.8%
21.2%
15.7% 7.1%
16.5% 14.7%
12.6% 9.4%
10.2%
5.8%
08 20 es al 07 lM 20 Al es al 06 lM 20 Al es al 05 lM 20 Al es al 04 lM 20 Al es 08 al 20 lM es Al al 07 em 20 lF es Al al 06 em 20 lF es Al al em 05 lF 20 Al e al em 04 lF 20 e 08 Al al 20 s em e al lF M 07 Al ic 20 an es sp al M Hi 06 ic 20 s an e l sp a M Hi 05 ic 20 s an e sp al M Hi 04 ic 20 an es 08 sp al M 20 Hi s ic e al an m 07 sp Fe 20 Hi ic es al an m 06 sp Fe 20 Hi s ic e al an m 05 sp Fe 20 Hi ic es al an m 04 sp Fe 20 Hi ic es al an m sp Fe Hi ic an sp Hi
91
Local Diploma Regents Diploma Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation
Total Cohort Graduation Rate After Four Years Through June Credentials Earned by Students Who Graduated
White Students and All Students
39.4% 38.3%
38.9% 42.1% 43.9% 36.0% 37.8% 37.9% 39.3% 40.6% 43.1% 43.0% 44.9% 48.7% 43.8%
47.3%
55.9%
10.4% 9.2% 8.5% 9.8% 8.8% 7.8% 6.6% 7.5% 5.1% 3.8%
16.5% 14.7%
12.6% 9.4%
12.6% 10.2%
5.8%
l Al
l Al
hi W te
hi W te m Fe es al
hi W te m Fe 04 20 es al
Local Diploma
hi W te m Fe 05 20 es al
hi W te m Fe 06 20 es al
hi W te M es al m Fe 07 20
Regents Diploma
hi W te M es al 08 20
hi W te M es al
hi W te M es al
hi W te es al
l Al
l Al
l Al
l Al
l Al
l Al
l Al
l Al
m Fe e al
m Fe
m Fe
m Fe
m Fe
M es al
M es al
M es al
M es al
M es al
e al
es al
es al
es al
es al
04 20
05 20
06 20
07 20
08 20
04 20
05 20
06 20
07 20
08 20
04 20
05 20
06 20
07 20
08 20
92
14.5%
12.6%
9.8%
4.9%
47.5%
47.2%
45.2%
42.3% 54.7%
43.7%
45.4%
48.8%
45.3%
45.8%
47.8%
7.2%
7.0%
7.0%
6.6% All Students 2006 All Students 2007 All Students 2008
Students with Students with Students with Students with All Students Disabilities 2005 Disabilities 2006 Disabilities 2007 Disabilities 2008 2005
Regents Diploma
Local Diploma
93
10.1%
4.7%
4.9%
54.2%
54.7%
73.5%
41.0%
40.4%
16.4%
ELL
Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation
Non-ELL
Regents Diploma
All Students
Local Diploma
94
Percentage of Total Cohort Who Received a Regents Diploma or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation after 4 Years by Need Resource Group Through June
61.2% 64% 65.4% 67.0% 71.1% 72.6% 74% 76.6% 78.7% 80.7% 84.1% 85% 87.0% 87.4% 90.9% 59.4% 61% 64.2% 66.8% 70.4%
Large City
60.6%
Total Public
2004 Cohort
95
Percentage of Total Cohort Students with Disabilities Who Received a Regents Diploma or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation After Four Years Through June by Need/Resource Capacity Category
48.9% 51% 51.6% 53.4% 55.4% 27.6% 30% 31.4% 32.6% 35.2% 7.0% 9% 11.1% 12.4% 14.1%
Large City
2004 Cohort
Total Public
96
Percentage of Total Cohort English Language Learners Who Received a Regents Diploma or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation After Four Years Through June by Need/Resource Capacity Category
Large City
2004 Cohort
Total Public
97
Percentage of Total Cohort Students by Racial/Ethnic Group Who Received a Regents Diploma or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation After Four Years Through June
80.6% 77.4% 78.4% 77.3% 79.1% 81.9%
71.0%
73.4%
73.7%
75.3%
54.5%
50.4%
53.7%
49.4%
45.5%
48.4%
44.2%
40.1%
43.5%
36.1%
Asian
Black
36.1%
Hispanic
40.1%
44.9%
49.3%
54.5%
White
2004 Cohort
2005 Cohort
2006 Cohort
2007 Cohort
2008 Cohort
59.4%
All Students
61.4%
64.2%
66.8%
98
70.4%
Percentage of Total Cohort American Indian/Alaska Native Students by Gender Who Received a Regents Diploma or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation After Four Years Through June
70.7% 74.7% 67.9% 65.2% 66.3% 63.0% 63.1% 60.6% 61.4% 64.2% 66.8% 70.4%
59.0%
54.7%
51.3%
49.9%
48.6%
50.1%
48.8%
44.7%
40.0%
40.8%
44.2%
45.5%
49.4%
50.4%
54.5%
All Female
55.8%
57.8%
All Male
59.4%
All Students
2004 Cohort
2005 Cohort
2006 Cohort
2007 Cohort
2008 Cohort
99
Percentage of Total Cohort Asian Students by Gender Who Received a Regents Diploma or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation After Four Years Through June
81.7% 82.7% 84.8% 78.0% 74.6% 76.7% 76.0% 77.4% 78.4% 80.6% 74.3% 73.4% 74.7%
71.0%
70.7%
69.1%
67.9%
66.4%
63.1% 66.3%
65.2%
63.0%
60.6%
Asian Female
Asian Male
Asian Total
All Female
55.8%
57.8%
All Male
59.4%
All Students
61.4%
64.2%
2004 Cohort
2005 Cohort
2006 Cohort
2007 Cohort
2008 Cohort
66.8%
100
70.4%
Percentage of Total Cohort Black Students by Gender Who Received a Regents Diploma or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation After Four Years Through June
70.7% 74.7% 67.9% 65.2% 66.3% 63.0% 63.1% 61.4% 64.2% 66.8% 70.4%
54.1% 60.0%
60.6%
49.0%
42.8% 47.5%
45.1%
41.3%
38.1%
Black Female
30.8%
Black Male
35.0%
36.1%
Black Total
40.1%
43.5%
48.4%
53.7%
All Female
55.8%
57.8%
All Male
2004 Cohort
2005 Cohort
2006 Total
2007 Total
2008 Total
59.4%
All Students
101
Percentage of Total Cohort Hispanic Students by Gender Who Received a Regents Diploma or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation After Four Years Through June
70.7% 74.7% 67.9% 65.2% 66.3% 63.0% 63.1% 60.6% 61.4% 64.2% 66.8% 70.4%
59.3%
54.0%
44.7% 49.9%
49.0%
43.9%
40.7%
39.6%
36.4%
Hispanic Female
32.6%
Hispanic Male
36.1%
Hispanic Total
40.1%
44.9%
49.3%
54.5%
All Female
55.8%
57.8%
All Male
2004 Cohort
2005 Cohort
2006 Cohort
2007 Cohort
2008 Cohort
59.4%
All Students
102
Percentage of Total Cohort White Students by Gender Who Received a Regents Diploma or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation After Four Years Through June
82.3% 85.4% 80.6% 78.7% 76.1% 78.6% 77.1% 75.3% 77.3% 79.1% 81.9% 74.2% 72.0% 73.7% 70.7% 74.7% 70.5% 70.4%
67.9%
65.2%
66.3%
63.0%
63.1%
60.6%
White Female
White Male
White Total
All Female
55.8%
57.8%
All Male
59.4%
All Students
61.4%
64.2%
2004 Cohort
2005 Cohort
2006 Cohort
2007 Cohort
2008 Cohort
66.8%
103
Mathematics Regents Examinations Implementation / Transition Timeline Approved by the Board of Regents 12/8/05 Mathematics A Mathematics B Algebra
Geometry
Algebra 2/ Trigonometry
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
.
104
Local Diploma Phase-Out* Timeline Requirements for Students Entering Grade 9 in:
September 2002-04
September 2005
September 2006
September 2007
September 2008
September 2009
September 2010
September 2011
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1-5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1-5
1-5
1-5
1-5
1-5
1-5
1-5
1-5
1-6
1-6
1-6
1-6
1-6
1-6
1-6
N/A
* The local diploma option remains for general education students who pass three Regents examinations with a score of 65 or above and two Regents examinations through an appeals process. In addition, students with disabilities who first enter grade 9 in September 2005 or later and earn a Regents examination score between 55 and 64 continue to be eligible for a local diploma. Students with disabilities who first enter grade 9 no later than the 2010-11 school year, but fail any of the five required Regents examinations, may earn a local diploma by passing the . corresponding Regents Competency Test.
105
106
107
Left the United States: Written statement from a parent or guardian indicating a destination or written documentation from a school administrator of a conversation had with the students parent indicating that the family is leaving the country, which the administrator includes in the students file.
See federal guidance at http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/hsgrguidance.pdf
108
Graduation Rates:
Students Who Started 9th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008
Supplemental Packet
109