Paper Titles

Simulation Modeling as a Tool for Taking into Account the Influence of Production Factors on the Physical and Mechanical Characteristics of Parts in the Manufacture of Parts from Composite Materials with Vacuum Infusion
p.109

Recent Advances on Biocompatible coating on Magnesium alloys by Micro Arc Oxidation Technique
p.117

Production of Epoxidized Rubber Seed Oil via Lipase-Catalyzed Epoxidation
p.135

Effect of Sintering Temperature on the Structural and Morphological Properties of Hydroxyapatite Prepared by Precipitation Method
p.151

Effect of Morphology on the Permeability of CO₂ Across PSF/FCTF-1 Mixed Matrix Membranes
p.163

Removal of Textile Wastewater Pollutants Using Zeolite Mineral as Adsorbent: Isotherm Studies
p.175

Synthesis of Fe₃O₄/TiO₂-S Composite and Its Activity Test as Photocatalyst on the Metanil Yellow Degradation
p.191

Fabrication and Utilization of High Loft Mats Based on Recycling Egyptian Pulled Wool and Flax Fibers Waste for Thermal Insulation Applications
p.203

Characterization of Eco-Friendly Lightweight Aggregate Concretes Incorporating Industrial Wastes
p.209

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vol. 944Effect of Morphology on the Permeability of CO2...

Effect of Morphology on the Permeability of CO₂ Across PSF/FCTF-1 Mixed Matrix Membranes

Article Preview

Abstract:

This reaserch examines different analytical models based on the ideal case membrane structure that can use to evaluate gas penetration into mixed-matrix membranes (MMMs) loaded with non-partial fillers. Many models predicted CO₂ permeance over PSF/FCTF-1(MMMs) and were compared to experimental results. The models were compared using standard criteria for validating models, such as the difference in penetrant permeability between the two phases ( and the absolute average relative error percentage. A comparison of those models was carried out based on the widely used model validation criteria, including a convenient measure of penetrant permeability difference between the two phases and absolute average relative error percent. Based on the typical values of morphological characteristics, it was determined that the following models fitted the data in the best order: Lewis‐Nielsen model< Pal model<Higuchi< Bruggeman model< Chiew and Gland < Maxwell model having AARE% values of 6.79, 8.45, 8.53, 10.23, 13.10, and 14.33, respectively. A scanning electron microscopy (SEM) examination of the cross-sectional image confirmed that the fillers were really ellipsoids scattered inside the matrix. The Maxwell-Wagner-Sillar model and the Lewis-Nielsen model were then used to evaluate the prolate effect, and the optimization curves of maximum packing () and shape factor (n) produced the least deviations. The AAR% variation was determined to be in the order of 0.01n 0.3, indicating the significance of the shape factor parameter in determining the accurate CO₂ permeance. Key words: polysulfone, Mixed matrix membrane, the permeability of CO₂, theoretical models

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Membranes and Membrane Technologies III

The 4th International Scientific Conference of Alkafeel University

Computational Materials Science and Digital Manufacturing

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volume 944)

Pages:

163-173

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/p-v22777

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

April 2023

Authors:

Ali A. Abdulabbas, Thamer J. Mohammed, Tahseen A. Al-Hattab

Keywords:

Mixed Matrix Membrane, Permeability of CO₂, Polysulfone, Theoretical Models

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2023 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] L. M. Robeson, "The upper bound revisited," J. Memb. Sci., vol. 320, no. 1–2, p.390–400, 2008.

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.030

[2] K. Farahdila et al., "Challenges in Membrane Process for Gas Separation from Natural Gas," J. Appl. Membr. Sci. Technol., vol. 25, no. 2, p.89–105, 2021.

DOI: 10.11113/amst.v25n2.222

[3] R. W. Baker and B. T. Low, "Gas separation membrane materials: A perspective," Macromolecules, vol. 47, no. 20, p.6999–7013, 2014.

DOI: 10.1021/ma501488s

[4] L. Y. Ng, A. W. Mohammad, C. P. Leo, and N. Hilal, "Polymeric membranes incorporated with metal/metal oxide nanoparticles: A comprehensive review," Desalination, vol. 308, p.15–33, 2013.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2010.11.033

[5] A. Hayek, Y. A. Shalabi, and A. Alsamah, "Sour mixed-gas upper bounds of glassy polymeric membranes," Sep. Purif. Technol., vol. 277, no. June, p.119535, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.seppur. 2021.119535.

DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.119535

[6] M. Galizia, W. S. Chi, Z. P. Smith, T. C. Merkel, R. W. Baker, and B. D. Freeman, "50th Anniversary Perspective: Polymers and Mixed Matrix Membranes for Gas and Vapor Separation: A Review and Prospective Opportunities," Macromolecules, vol. 50, no. 20, p.7809–7843, 2017.

DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.7b01718

[7] B. Samiey, C. H. Cheng, and J. Wu, "Organic-inorganic hybrid polymers as adsorbents for removal of heavy metal ions from solutions: A review," Materials (Basel)., vol. 7, no. 2, p.673–726, 2014.

DOI: 10.3390/ma7020673

[8] H. Vinh-Thang and S. Kaliaguine, "Predictive models for mixed-matrix membrane performance: A review," Chem. Rev., vol. 113, no. 7, p.4980–5028, 2013.

DOI: 10.1021/cr3003888

[9] K. Mohammad Gheimasi, T. Mohammadi, and O. Bakhtiari, "Modification of ideal MMMs permeation prediction models: Effects of partial pore blockage and polymer chain rigidification," J. Memb. Sci., vol. 427, p.399–410, 2013.

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.10.003

[10] H. Furukawa, K. E. Cordova, M. O'Keeffe, and O. M. Yaghi, "The chemistry and applications of metal-organic frameworks," Science (80-. )., vol. 341, no. 6149, 2013, doi: 10.1126/ science.1230444.

DOI: 10.1126/science.1230444

[11] E. Chehrazi, "Theoretical Models for Gas Separation Prediction of Mixed Matrix Membranes : Effects of the Shape Factor of Nano llers and Interface Voids," p.0–21, 2022.

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1862670/v1

[12] S. Bügel, A. Spieß, and C. Janiak, "Covalent triazine framework CTF-fluorene as porous filler material in mixed matrix membranes for CO2/CH4 separation," Microporous Mesoporous Mater., vol. 316, no. February, 2021.

DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2021.110941

[13] R. Pal, "Permeation models for mixed matrix membranes," J. Colloid Interface Sci., vol. 317, no. 1, p.191–198, 2008.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2007.09.032

[14] D. Q. Vu, W. J. Koros, and S. J. Miller, "Mixed matrix membranes using carbon molecular sieves," J. Memb. Sci., vol. 211, no. 2, p.335–348, 2003.

DOI: 10.1016/s0376-7388(02)00425-8

[15] R. H. B. Bouma, A. Checchetti, G. Chidichimo, and E. Drioli, "Permeation through a heterogeneous membrane: The effect of the dispersed phase," J. Memb. Sci., vol. 128, no. 2, p.141–149, 1997.

DOI: 10.1016/S0376-7388(96)00303-1

[16] G. Bánhegyi, "Comparison of electrical mixture rules for composites," Colloid Polym. Sci., vol. 264, no. 12, p.1030–1050, 1986.

DOI: 10.1007/BF01410321

[17] L. E. Nielsen, "Thermal conductivity of particulate‐filled polymers," J. Appl. Polym. Sci., vol. 17, no. 12, p.3819–3820, 1973.

DOI: 10.1002/app.1973.070171224

[18] R. Pal, "New models for thermal conductivity of particulate composites," J. Reinf. Plast. Compos., vol. 26, no. 7, p.643–651, 2007.

DOI: 10.1177/0731684407075569

[19] Y. C. Chiew and E. D. Glandt, "The effect of structure on the conductivity of a dispersion," J. Colloid Interface Sci., vol. 94, no. 1, p.90–104, 1983.

DOI: 10.1016/0021-9797(83)90238-2

[20] E. E. Gonzo, M. L. Parentis, and J. C. Gottifredi, "Estimating models for predicting effective permeability of mixed matrix membranes," J. Memb. Sci., vol. 277, no. 1–2, p.46–54, 2006.

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.10.007

[21] T. S. Chung, L. Y. Jiang, Y. Li, and S. Kulprathipanja, "Mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) comprising organic polymers with dispersed inorganic fillers for gas separation," Prog. Polym. Sci., vol. 32, no. 4, p.483–507, 2007.

DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.01.008

[22] J. H. Petropoulos, "Comparative Study of Approaches Applied To the Permeability of Binary Composite Polymeric Materials.," J. Polym. Sci. Part A-2, Polym. Phys., vol. 23, no. 7, p.1309–1324, 1985.

DOI: 10.1002/pol.1985.180230703

[23] E. Chehrazi, M. Raef, M. Noroozi, and M. Panahi-Sarmad, "A theoretical model for the gas permeation prediction of nanotube-mixed matrix membranes: Unveiling the effect of interfacial layer," J. Memb. Sci., vol. 570–571, p.168–175, 2019.

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.10.038

[24] T. T. Moore, R. Mahajan, D. Q. Vu, and W. J. Koros, "Hybrid Membrane Materials Comprising Organic Polymers with Rigid Dispersed Phases," AIChE J., vol. 50, no. 2, p.311–321, 2004.

DOI: 10.1002/aic.10029

[25] "Effect of Aspect Ratio on the Permittivity of Graphite.pdf."

[26] J. Ahn et al., "Gas transport behavior of mixed-matrix membranes composed of silica nanoparticles in a polymer of intrinsic microporosity (PIM-1)," J. Memb. Sci., vol. 346, no. 2, p.280–287, 2010.

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.09.047

[27] S. Bügel, A. Spieß, and C. Janiak, "Covalent triazine framework CTF-fluorene as porous filler material in mixed matrix membranes for CO2/CH4 separation," Microporous Mesoporous Mater., vol. 316, no. November 2020, 2021.

DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2021.110941

[28] S. Wang et al., "Advances in high permeability polymer-based membrane materials for CO2 separations," Energy Environ. Sci., vol. 9, no. 6, p.1863–1890, 2016.

DOI: 10.1039/c6ee00811a

[29] I. Salahshoori, A. Seyfaee, and A. Babapoor, "Recent advances in synthesis and applications of mixed matrix membranes," Synth. Sinter., vol. 1, no. 1, p.1–27, 2021, doi: 10.53063/synsint.2 021.116.

DOI: 10.53063/synsint.2021.116