Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 

Topic Editors

Centro de Quimica Estrutural, Instituto Superior Técnico da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Escuela de Ingeniería y Arquitectura (EINA), Universidad de Zaragoza, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain
Centro de Química Estrutural, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal

Carbon Dioxide Capture or Removal and Valorisation: Advances in the Development of Materials and Technologies

Abstract submission deadline
closed (31 August 2024)
Manuscript submission deadline
30 November 2024
Viewed by
8702

Topic Information

Dear Colleagues,

The energetic transition requires the replacement of fossil fuels with renewable energy sources, along with the development of innovative decarbonation technologies and the establishment of a circular economy model. Developing and deploying carbon capture (from fixed sources) or removal (from the atmosphere) technologies using innovative CO2 capture materials and CO2 valorization in short- or long-lived biofuels or green products are essential to reach carbon neutrality or negative emissions targets. This Special Topic, “Carbon Dioxide Capture or Removal and Valorisation: Advances in the Development of Materials and Technologies”, will address topics related, but not limited to:

  • Advances in CO2 sorbent properties for carbon removal (e.g., direct air capture, mineralization, biochar) and capture (e.g., post-combustion and pre-combustion conditions);
  • Enhancement of natural and synthetic sorbent materials properties for CO2 uptake;
  • Stability, activity, and regeneration of sorbents under different technological applications at low, medium, or high temperatures;
  • Dual-function materials for CO2 capture and conversion;
  • Development of catalysts for CO2 conversion to biofuels and green products;
  • Thermal-, photo-, electro-, bio- and plasma catalysis applications in CO2 conversion;
  • Carbon capture from power plants and industrial sectors and carbon removal from the air—novel technologies, integrated concepts, and methodologies;
  • Conversion of CO2 into fuels and chemicals through biological, thermal, electrochemical, and photochemical processes. In this topic, original papers or reviews are welcome.

Dr. Paula Teixeira
Dr. María Pilar Lisbona
Dr. Carmen Bacariza
Topic Editors

Keywords

  • CO2 capture
  • thermochemical energy storage 
  • power-to-X
  • bifunctional materials 
  • DAC
  • mineralization

Participating Journals

Journal Name Impact Factor CiteScore Launched Year First Decision (median) APC
Catalysts
catalysts
3.8 6.8 2011 12.9 Days CHF 2200 Submit
Clean Technologies
cleantechnol
4.0 6.1 2019 30 Days CHF 1600 Submit
Energies
energies
3.0 6.2 2008 17.5 Days CHF 2600 Submit
Gases
gases
- - 2021 23.4 Days CHF 1000 Submit
Sustainability
sustainability
3.3 6.8 2009 20 Days CHF 2400 Submit

Preprints.org is a multidiscipline platform providing preprint service that is dedicated to sharing your research from the start and empowering your research journey.

MDPI Topics is cooperating with Preprints.org and has built a direct connection between MDPI journals and Preprints.org. Authors are encouraged to enjoy the benefits by posting a preprint at Preprints.org prior to publication:

  1. Immediately share your ideas ahead of publication and establish your research priority;
  2. Protect your idea from being stolen with this time-stamped preprint article;
  3. Enhance the exposure and impact of your research;
  4. Receive feedback from your peers in advance;
  5. Have it indexed in Web of Science (Preprint Citation Index), Google Scholar, Crossref, SHARE, PrePubMed, Scilit and Europe PMC.

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Journals
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 5073 KiB  
Article
Metal Oxalates as a CO2 Solid State Reservoir: The Carbon Capture Reaction
by Linda Pastero, Vittorio Barella, Enrico Allais, Marco Pazzi, Fabrizio Sordello, Quentin Wehrung and Alessandro Pavese
Clean Technol. 2024, 6(4), 1389-1406; https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol6040066 - 14 Oct 2024
Viewed by 745
Abstract
To maintain the carbon dioxide concentration below the no-return threshold for climate change, we must consider the reduction in anthropic emissions coupled to carbon capture methods applied in synergy. In our recent papers, we proposed a green and reliable method for carbon mineralization [...] Read more.
To maintain the carbon dioxide concentration below the no-return threshold for climate change, we must consider the reduction in anthropic emissions coupled to carbon capture methods applied in synergy. In our recent papers, we proposed a green and reliable method for carbon mineralization using ascorbic acid aqueous solution as the reducing agent for carbon (IV) to carbon (III), thus obtaining oxalic acid exploiting green reagents. Oxalic acid is made to mineralize as calcium (as the model cation) oxalate. Oxalates are solid-state reservoirs suitable for long-term carbon storage or carbon feedstock for manufacturing applications. The carbon mineralization reaction is a double-step process (carbon reduction and oxalate precipitation), and the carbon capture efficiency is invariably represented by a double-slope curve we formerly explained as a decrease in the reducing effectiveness of ascorbic acid during reaction. In the present paper, we demonstrated that the reaction proceeds via a “pure CO2-capture” stage in which ascorbic acid oxidizes into dehydroascorbic acid and carbon (IV) reduces to carbon (III) and a “mixed” stage in which the redox reaction competes with the degradation of ascorbic acid in producing oxalic acid. Despite the irreversibility of the reduction reaction, that was demonstrated in abiotic conditions, the analysis of costs according to the market price of the reagents endorses the application of the method. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>General trend in the carbon capture curves as determined during capture experiments (B-setup, <a href="#app1-cleantechnol-06-00066" class="html-app">Figure S1 in the Supplementary Materials</a>). The double slope was roughly associated with the kinetics of the redox reaction, i.e., fast at the initial stages when H<sub>2</sub>A-reducing power was high and then slowed down by the degradation of H<sub>2</sub>A [<a href="#B55-cleantechnol-06-00066" class="html-bibr">55</a>,<a href="#B57-cleantechnol-06-00066" class="html-bibr">57</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Trend of d<sup>13</sup>C measured in the mineralizing system (solid diamond-, liquid circles-, and gas squares phases) vs. time. No handling in the second run allowed a better quality of data, highlighting the first-order decay of d<sup>13</sup>C in the dissolved CO<sub>2</sub>. The points related to the d<sup>13</sup>C of the CO<sub>2</sub> from the canister and H<sub>2</sub>A (squares) are reported to be compared with the trend of the dissolved carbon. A single value for the solid fraction is reported (diamond) because of the experimental procedure intended to limit the artifacts’ appearances in the measurements as explained in the text.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The general carbon capture curve via carbon mineralization into oxalates explained: in the light-grey area, the efficient pure carbon capture process during the “low-oxidation stage” of the H<sub>2</sub>A as determined by CV and LC measurements; in the dark-grey area, the mixed process of capture and H<sub>2</sub>A degradation occurring when the H<sub>2</sub>A reaches higher degree of oxidation (30–40% from CV measurements) and the H<sub>2</sub>A degradation cascade is running.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Calcium oxalate is the only product of the mineralization reaction. (<b>a</b>) Calcium oxalate crystals from a B-setup carbon mineralization experiment; (<b>b</b>) XRPD pattern of the precipitate (red bars: weddellite pattern from Tazzoli and Domeneghetti, 1980 [<a href="#B105-cleantechnol-06-00066" class="html-bibr">105</a>]).</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 550 KiB  
Review
Carbon Market for Climate Projects in Russia: An Overview of Nature-Based and Technological Carbon Offsets
by Tatiana Nevzorova
Gases 2024, 4(3), 153-173; https://doi.org/10.3390/gases4030009 - 8 Jul 2024
Viewed by 1446
Abstract
Climate projects can become one of the key tools for decarbonization in Russia. They have powerful potential in terms of solving the problems of reducing emissions and increasing the absorption of greenhouse gases, as well as monetization potential for businesses. Despite the geopolitical [...] Read more.
Climate projects can become one of the key tools for decarbonization in Russia. They have powerful potential in terms of solving the problems of reducing emissions and increasing the absorption of greenhouse gases, as well as monetization potential for businesses. Despite the geopolitical crisis and sanctions imposed on Russia, certain opportunities for implementing climate projects have remained accessible. This study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the current status, including the regulations and approved methodologies, prospects, and challenges for climate projects in the carbon market in Russia. It also offers an overview of international carbon market mechanisms and analyses the advantages and disadvantages of the nature-based and technological solutions of climate projects for carbon sequestration. This, in turn, can facilitate the realization of future strategies for realizing the bigger potential of Russian climate projects in the domestic and international carbon markets. This research also provides up-to-date data on the current situation of the carbon market in Russia. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Accounting methods and tools under Federal Law No. 34.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 7283 KiB  
Article
Investigation and Comparison of Catalytic Methods to Produce Green CO2-Containing Monomers for Polycarbonates
by Daniel Christian Brüggemann, Philipp Harry Isbrücker, Dzenna Zukova, Franz Robert Otto Heinrich Schröter, Yen Hoang Le and Reinhard Schomäcker
Catalysts 2024, 14(6), 362; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14060362 - 1 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1170
Abstract
The preparation of CO2-containing polymers with improved degradation properties is still very challenging. An elegant method for preparing these polymers is to use CO2-containing monomers in ring-opening polymerizations (ROP) which are particularly gentle and energy-saving methods. However, cyclic carbonates [...] Read more.
The preparation of CO2-containing polymers with improved degradation properties is still very challenging. An elegant method for preparing these polymers is to use CO2-containing monomers in ring-opening polymerizations (ROP) which are particularly gentle and energy-saving methods. However, cyclic carbonates are required for this which are not readily available. This paper therefore aims to present the optimization and comparison of two synthesis methods to obtain cyclic carbonates for ROP. Within this work, cyclic styrene carbonate was synthesized from readily available raw materials by using a Jacobsen catalyst for the reaction of styrene oxide and carbon dioxide or an organocatalyst for the transesterification of methyl carbonate with 1-phenyl-1,2-ethanediol. The latter performed with 100% selectivity to the desired styrene carbonate, which was succesfully tested in ROP, producing an amorphous thermoplastic polymer with a TG of 185 °C. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Large-scale synthesis of cyclic ethylene carbonate (cEC) via the Omega process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Possible production routes from CO<sub>2</sub> to the CO<sub>2</sub>-containing polymer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Structure of the Jacobsen catalyst (<b>M</b> = Mn or Co).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Identification of the polymeric (blue), linear (red), and cyclic (black) carbonate band through (<b>a</b>) ATR-IR spectra and (<b>b</b>) HPLC-ESI-DAD measurements.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) ATR-IR spectra of the basic experiment (120 °C, 15 bar), (<b>b</b>) resolution change to the relevant peak for the standard reaction, (<b>c</b>) ATR-IR spectra for experiment with lower concentration of TBAB, (<b>d</b>) ATR-IR spectra for experiment with higher concentration of TBAB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>ATR-IR spectrum of the reaction at 3 eq. DMC and 65 °C reaction temperature.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p><sup>1</sup>H-NMR spectrum styrene carbonate reference substance purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Saint Louis, MO, USA).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p><sup>1</sup>H-NMR spectrum of styrene carbonate of the reaction at 3 eq. DMC and 65 °C reaction temperature.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>) HPLC-DAD chromatogram of the starting material phenylethane-1,2-diol. (<b>b</b>) HPLC-DAD chromatogram of the styrene carbonate reference substance, obtained from Sigma Aldrich. (<b>c</b>) HPLC-DAD chromatogram of the styrene carbonate produced from the organocatalytic production of styrene carbonate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(<b>a</b>) Recording of the probe ATR-IR spectrum during the formation of cSC with subsequent ROP. (<b>b</b>) Chronological view with focus on the changing bands of the ATR IR spectrum during the formation of cyclic styrene carbonate with subsequent ROP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>DSC spectrum of the products of the ROP of styrene carbonate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Reaction setup for the high-pressure homogeneous synthesis of styrene carbonate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Synthesis of cyclic styrene carbonate by reaction of phenyl ethanediol with dimethyl carbonate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Experimental setup for the organocatalytic synthesis of styrene carbonate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Synthesis of Polystyrene carbonate by ROP of styrene carbonate with phenylacetic acid.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 3156 KiB  
Article
Carbon Dioxide Capture under Low-Pressure Low-Temperature Conditions Using Shaped Recycled Fly Ash Particles
by Sherif Fakher, Abdelaziz Khlaifat and Abdullah Hassanien
Gases 2024, 4(2), 117-132; https://doi.org/10.3390/gases4020007 - 23 May 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2013
Abstract
Carbon-capture technologies are extremely abundant, yet they have not been applied extensively worldwide due to their high cost and technological complexities. This research studies the ability of polymerized fly ash to capture carbon dioxide (CO2) under low-pressure and low-temperature conditions via [...] Read more.
Carbon-capture technologies are extremely abundant, yet they have not been applied extensively worldwide due to their high cost and technological complexities. This research studies the ability of polymerized fly ash to capture carbon dioxide (CO2) under low-pressure and low-temperature conditions via physical adsorption. The research also studies the ability to desorb CO2 due to the high demand for CO2 in different industries. The adsorption–desorption hysteresis was measured using infrared-sensor detection apparatus. The impact of the CO2 injection rate for adsorption, helium injection rate for desorption, temperature, and fly ash contact surface area on the adsorption–desorption hysteresis was investigated. The results showed that change in the CO2 injection rate had little impact on the variation in the adsorption capacity; for all CO2 rate experiments, the adsorption reached more than 90% of the total available adsorption sites. Increasing the temperature caused the polymerized fly ash to expand, thus increasing the available adsorption sites, thus increasing the overall adsorption volume. At low helium rates, desorption was extremely lengthy which resulted in a delayed hysteresis response. This is not favorable since it has a negative impact on the adsorption–desorption cyclic rate. Based on the results, the polymerized fly ash proved to have a high CO2 capture capability and thus can be applied for carbon-capture applications. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption experimental setup.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>General plot for trend clarification.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption/desorption at 30 °C using a 3 slpm helium desorption rate and using a CO<sub>2</sub> injection rate of (<b>a</b>) 0.05 slpm, (<b>b</b>) 0.1 slpm, (<b>c</b>) 0.15 slpm, and (<b>d</b>) 0.2 slpm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption/desorption at 30 °C using a 0.15 slpm CO<sub>2</sub> injection rate and using a helium desorption/injection rate of (<b>a</b>) 0.5 slpm, (<b>b</b>) 2 slpm, (<b>c</b>) 3 slpm, and (<b>d</b>) 4 slpm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption/desorption at 30 °C using a 0.15 slpm injection rate and 3 slpm helium desorption rate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption/desorption at (<b>a</b>) 40 °C and (<b>b</b>) 50 °C using a 0.15 slpm CO<sub>2</sub> injection rate and 3 slpm helium desorption rate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption/desorption at 30 °C using 0.15 slpm rate and 708 cm<sup>2</sup> surface area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption/desorption at 30 °C using a 0.15 slpm rate and 364 cm<sup>2</sup> surface area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Adsorption to desorption ratio at different CO<sub>2</sub> injection rates.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Adsorption to desorption ratio at different helium injection rates.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Adsorption to desorption ratio at different temperatures.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 5875 KiB  
Article
Production of Sustainable Adsorbents for CO2 Capture Applications from Food Biowastes
by Fernando Rubiera, Carlos Córdoba, Tamara Pena and Marta G. Plaza
Energies 2024, 17(5), 1205; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17051205 - 3 Mar 2024
Viewed by 1534
Abstract
Traditional methods to develop biomass-based carbon adsorbents generally involve carbonization followed by chemical or physical activation. However, routes involving the hydrothermal treatment of biomass are receiving growing interest. In this work, two different strategies for the synthesis of sustainable CO2 adsorbents are [...] Read more.
Traditional methods to develop biomass-based carbon adsorbents generally involve carbonization followed by chemical or physical activation. However, routes involving the hydrothermal treatment of biomass are receiving growing interest. In this work, two different strategies for the synthesis of sustainable CO2 adsorbents are compared, i.e., in situ ionic activation and hydrothermal treatment followed by activation with CO2. The latter is a green and simple procedure that does not require the addition of chemicals or acid-washing stages, and which leads to carbon adsorbents with relatively high CO2 adsorption capacity at low pressures, up to 0.64 mmol g−1 at 15 kPa and 50 °C, conditions relevant for postcombustion CO2 capture applications. On the other hand, in situ ionic activation can lead to carbon adsorbents with superior CO2 adsorption capacity in the aforementioned conditions, 0.78 mmol g−1, and with reduced cost and environmental impact compared to conventional chemical activation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Picture of: (<b>a</b>) Cyperus sculentus tubers (also known as tiger nuts, earth almonds, or <span class="html-italic">chufas</span>); (<b>b</b>) HSW.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic representation of the carbon synthesis protocol consisting on hydrothermal treatment followed by activation with CO<sub>2</sub>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Schematic representation of the carbon synthesis through in situ ionic activation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>SEM micrograph of the raw <span class="html-italic">horchata</span> solid waste (HSW).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>SEM micrographs of HSWH-190-3: (<b>a</b>) general view of the pellet surface; (<b>b</b>) detail of silicophytolith accumulation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>SEM micrographs of: (<b>a</b>) HSWHC-190-3-800-90; (<b>b</b>) HSWC-900-60.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Narrow micropore size distribution of samples HSWHC-150-3-800-60, HSWHC-170-3-800-60, and HSWHC-190-3-800-60.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption isotherms of carbons HSWHC-150-3-800-60, HSWHC-170-3-800-60, and HSWHC-190-3-800-60 at: (<b>a</b>) 25 °C; (<b>b</b>) 50 °C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Narrow micropore size distribution of carbons HSWHC-190-3-800-60, HSWHC-190-3-800-90, and HSWHC-190-3-800-120.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption isotherms at 50 °C of carbons HSWHC-190-3-800-60, HSWHC-190-3-800-90, and HSWHC-190-3-800-120.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>SEM micrograph of carbon HSWIA-190-8-600.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Narrow micropore size distribution of carbons HSWIA-160-8-600, HSWIA-190-8-600, HSWIA-160-8-800, and HSWIA-190-8-800.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption isotherms at 50 °C of HSWIA carbons activated at: (<b>a</b>) 600 °C; (<b>b</b>) 800 °C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Narrow micropore size distribution of carbons HSWGIA-160-8-600 and HSWGIA-190-8-600.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption isotherms at 50 °C of carbons HSWGIA-160-8-600 and HSWGIA-190-8-600.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Comparison of the narrow micropore size distribution of carbons HSWHC-190-3-800-90, HSWIA-160-8-800 and reference commercial activated carbon Norit R 2030 CO2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>(<b>a</b>) Comparison of the CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption isotherms at 50 °C of carbons HSWHC-190-3-800-90, HSWIA-160-8-800 and reference commercial activated carbon Norit R 2030 CO2 (full symbols represent adsorption data and empty symbols desorption data); (<b>b</b>) Isosteric heat of adsorption of CO<sub>2</sub> versus loading for carbons HSWHC-190-3-800-90, HSWIA-160-8-800 and reference commercial activated carbon Norit R 2030 CO2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>(<b>a</b>) N<sub>2</sub> adsorption isotherms at 50 °C of carbons HSWHC-190-3-800-90, HSWIA-160-8-800 and reference commercial activated carbon Norit R 2030 CO2; (<b>b</b>) CO<sub>2</sub>/N<sub>2</sub> equilibrium selectivity at 50 °C and 101.325 kPa of carbons HSWHC-190-3-800-90, HSWIA-160-8-800 and commercial activated carbon Norit R 2030 CO2.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop