<p>Representation of flow paths (in blue lines) in the carbonate plug [<a href="#B14-gases-04-00022" class="html-bibr">14</a>].</p> Full article ">Figure 2
<p>P-T diagram for the modeled fluid.</p> Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Ternary representation of the distribution of the phase saturations (S<sub>g</sub>, S<sub>o</sub>, and S<sub>w</sub>) at the end of the simulation.</p> Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Simulation results for the five simulated gridblock dimensions. (<b>a</b>) The graph shows the final average gas saturation for the lower layer. (<b>b</b>) The graph on the right shows the simulation time necessary to reach the steady state. In yellow, we have the simulation results with gridblock side 2.1284 mm and flow rate 0.0002 m<sup>3</sup>/d; in orange, the simulation results with gridblock side 2.1284 cm and flow rate 0.2 m<sup>3</sup>/d; in green, the simulation results with gridblock side 2.1284 dm and flow rate 200 m<sup>3</sup>/d; in blue, the simulation results with gridblock side 2.1284 m and flow rate 200 × 10<sup>3</sup> m<sup>3</sup>/d; and in brown, the simulation results with gridblock side 2.1284 dam and flow rate 200 × 10<sup>6</sup> m<sup>3</sup>/d.</p> Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Variation in gas and oil (condensate) residual saturation values with trapping number.</p> Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Variation in relative permeability values of gas and oil (condensate) endpoint with trapping number.</p> Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Variation in relative permeability exponent values (Brooks–Corey) of gas and oil (condensate) with trapping number.</p> Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Final relative permeability curve after upscaling.</p> Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Relative permeability curve of the Brooks–Corey original-adjustment microscale for a low trapping number.</p> Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Typical normalized curve obtained from the laboratory gas–oil relative permeability test.</p> Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Gas net pay (in meters) distribution in a 3D mesh for field-scale simulation.</p> Full article ">Figure 12
<p>(<b>a</b>) Graph of productivity values concerning gas for simulations with three different relative permeability curves—well P09. (<b>b</b>) Graph of productivity values in relation to gas for simulations with three different relative permeability curves—well P18. Blue curves are overlapped by the green curves.</p> Full article ">Figure 13
<p>(<b>a</b>) Graph of productivity values concerning oil for simulations with three different relative permeability curves—well P09. (<b>b</b>) Graph of productivity values in relation to oil for simulations with three different relative permeability curves—well P18.</p> Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Regions of interest close to the wells for evaluating condensate saturation, showing the values at the end of the simulation schedule.</p> Full article ">Figure 15
<p>(<b>a</b>) Evolution of average oil saturation in the Well09 region. (<b>b</b>) Evolution of average oil saturation in the Well18 regions.</p> Full article ">