Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (50)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = minimum risk portfolio

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
22 pages, 1967 KiB  
Article
Portfolio Selection with Hierarchical Isomorphic Risk Aversion
by Wan-Yi Chiu
Mathematics 2024, 12(21), 3375; https://doi.org/10.3390/math12213375 - 28 Oct 2024
Viewed by 490
Abstract
Researchers usually specify risk aversion coefficients from 1 (lowest) to M (highest) for a portfolio to indicate active or passive approaches. How effective is this practice? Recent studies suggest that the global minimum variance portfolio (GMVP) is statistically equivalent to portfolios with extensive [...] Read more.
Researchers usually specify risk aversion coefficients from 1 (lowest) to M (highest) for a portfolio to indicate active or passive approaches. How effective is this practice? Recent studies suggest that the global minimum variance portfolio (GMVP) is statistically equivalent to portfolios with extensive risk aversion coefficients (the GMVP-equivalent). Expressing the risk aversion coefficient as a Taylor series of the target return and efficient set constants, we generalize the previous result to the non-GMVP-equivalents and segment mean-variance portfolios according to a hierarchy of risk aversion coefficients. In this paper, we show that hierarchical risk aversion coefficients are superior to isometric attributes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Frontier and risk aversion coefficient. This graph geometrically interprets the risk aversion coefficient (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>γ</mi> </semantics></math>) as the marginal reward that an investor needs to take on more risk (in terms of variance) compared to the global minimum variance portfolio (GMVP, with an infinite <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>γ</mi> </semantics></math>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Procedure for constructing <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>μ</mi> <mi>p</mi> </msub> </semantics></math>-<math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>γ</mi> </semantics></math>-equivalents. This graph plots the construction of first-degree non-overlapping <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mover accent="true"> <mi>μ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">^</mo> </mover> <mi>p</mi> </msub> </semantics></math>-<math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>γ</mi> </semantics></math>-equivalent intervals. The GMVP-equivalent bound <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mover accent="true"> <mi>γ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">^</mo> </mover> <mi>g</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> yields an interval <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>γ</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>∈</mo> <mrow> <mo>[</mo> <msub> <mi>L</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>]</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math> for a particular target return <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>μ</mi> <msub> <mi>p</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </msub> </semantics></math> at the <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>−</mo> <mi>α</mi> <mo>)</mo> <mo>×</mo> <mn>100</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> confidence level to connect the GMVP-equivalent. We name <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>[</mo> <msub> <mi>L</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>]</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> the <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>μ</mi> <msub> <mi>p</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </msub> </semantics></math>-<math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>γ</mi> </semantics></math>-equivalent. Likewise, using <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>L</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> as the next starting point and repeating the same procedures yields the <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>μ</mi> <msub> <mi>p</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </msub> </semantics></math>-<math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>γ</mi> </semantics></math>-equivalent interval <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>[</mo> <msub> <mi>L</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>]</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Five years isomorphic tiers in 2013. Panel (<b>A</b>) illustrates the isomorphic tiers of the risk aversion coefficients using different shaded areas, with darker colors indicating higher risk aversion coefficients and lower thickness implying a shorter <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>γ</mi> </semantics></math> interval. Panel (<b>B</b>) specifically magnifies the GMVP neighborhood with <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mover accent="true"> <mi>γ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">^</mo> </mover> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mi>A</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>≥</mo> <mn>40</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. The values <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mover accent="true"> <mi>γ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">^</mo> </mover> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mi>A</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>15</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>16</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mo>…</mo> <mo>,</mo> <mn>39</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> cluster around the <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mover accent="true"> <mi>μ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">^</mo> </mover> <msub> <mi>p</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </msub> </semantics></math>-<math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>γ</mi> </semantics></math>-equivalent, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mover accent="true"> <mi>γ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">^</mo> </mover> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mi>A</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>6</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>7</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mo>…</mo> <mo>,</mo> <mn>15</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> fall inside the <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mover accent="true"> <mi>μ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">^</mo> </mover> <msub> <mi>p</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </msub> </semantics></math>-<math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>γ</mi> </semantics></math>-equivalent, the <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mover accent="true"> <mi>μ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">^</mo> </mover> <msub> <mi>p</mi> <mn>3</mn> </msub> </msub> </semantics></math>-<math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>γ</mi> </semantics></math>-equivalent contains <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mover accent="true"> <mi>γ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">^</mo> </mover> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mi>A</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>3</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>4</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, and the <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mover accent="true"> <mi>μ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">^</mo> </mover> <msub> <mi>p</mi> <mn>4</mn> </msub> </msub> </semantics></math>-<math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>γ</mi> </semantics></math>-equivalent only contains the lower risk aversion coefficients <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mover accent="true"> <mi>γ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">^</mo> </mover> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mi>A</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Tier variations due to approximation methods. This figure illustrates the approximation effect (<a href="#FD37-mathematics-12-03375" class="html-disp-formula">37</a>), where the tiers based on the first-degree approximations (<b>left panel</b>) differ from those based on the second-degree approximations (<b>right panel</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Tier variations due to assets sets. This figure illustrates the asset effect, where the tiers based on asset sets consisting exclusively of stocks (<b>top panel</b>) different from those based on the expanded asset sets including bonds (<b>bottom panel</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Tier variations due to mixed effects. This figure shows a mixed effect (<a href="#FD42-mathematics-12-03375" class="html-disp-formula">42</a>), where the bottom-right estimate <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>T</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>e</mi> <msub> <mi>r</mi> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <mi>B</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> has a significantly different lower limit (L) among the four calculations. The (<b>top</b>) and (<b>bottom</b>) panels reveal the mixed effect caused by two different asset sets. Meanwhile, the (<b>left</b>) and (<b>right</b>) panels indicate the approximation effect. Likewise, the two cases (<a href="#FD39-mathematics-12-03375" class="html-disp-formula">39</a>)–(<a href="#FD41-mathematics-12-03375" class="html-disp-formula">41</a>) refer to the significant differences between the top-left estimate (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>T</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>e</mi> <msub> <mi>r</mi> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mi>A</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>), bottom-left estimate (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>T</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>e</mi> <msub> <mi>r</mi> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mi>B</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>), and top-right estimate (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>T</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>e</mi> <msub> <mi>r</mi> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <mi>A</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>) in comparison to the other three equal estimates.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 1431 KiB  
Article
Using Precious Metals to Reduce the Downside Risk of FinTech Stocks
by Perry Sadorsky
FinTech 2024, 3(4), 537-550; https://doi.org/10.3390/fintech3040028 - 25 Oct 2024
Viewed by 665
Abstract
FinTech stocks are an important new asset class that reflects the rapidly growing FinTech sector. This paper studies the practical implications of using gold, silver, and basket-of-precious-metals (gold, silver, platinum, palladium) ETFs to diversify risk in FinTech stocks. Downside risk reduction is estimated [...] Read more.
FinTech stocks are an important new asset class that reflects the rapidly growing FinTech sector. This paper studies the practical implications of using gold, silver, and basket-of-precious-metals (gold, silver, platinum, palladium) ETFs to diversify risk in FinTech stocks. Downside risk reduction is estimated using relative risk ratios based on CVaR. The analysis shows that gold provides the most downside risk protection. For a 5% CVaR, a 30% portfolio weight for gold reduces the downside risk by about 25%. The minimum variance and minimum correlation three-asset (FinTech, gold, and silver) portfolios (with portfolio weights estimated using a TVP-VAR model) have the highest risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio, Omega ratio) followed by the fixed-weight FinTech and gold portfolio. These results show the benefits of diversifying an investment in FinTech stocks with precious metals. These results are robust to weekly or monthly portfolio rebalancing and reasonable transaction costs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Trends and New Developments in FinTech)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Time series plot of FINX, GLD, SLV, and GLTR adjusted closing prices.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Relative risk ratio plots. The suffixes _m and _h denote modified and historical CVaR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Risk ratios (at 5% loss) across time.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Risk ratios (at 1% loss) across time.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Equity curves—weekly rebalancing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Total connectedness index estimated from a TVP-VAR(1) model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Network connectedness.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Equity curves for three-asset portfolios (FINX, GLD, SLV)—weekly rebalancing.</p>
Full article ">
28 pages, 1823 KiB  
Article
Non-Commodity Agricultural Price Hedging with Minimum Tracking Error Portfolios: The Case of Mexican Hass Avocado
by Oscar V. De la Torre-Torres, María de la Cruz del Río-Rama and Álvarez-García José
Agriculture 2024, 14(10), 1692; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14101692 - 27 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1094
Abstract
The present paper tests the use of an agricultural futures minimum tracking error portfolio to replicate the price of the Mexican Hass avocado (a non-commodity). The motivation is that this portfolio could be used to balance the basis risk that the avocado price [...] Read more.
The present paper tests the use of an agricultural futures minimum tracking error portfolio to replicate the price of the Mexican Hass avocado (a non-commodity). The motivation is that this portfolio could be used to balance the basis risk that the avocado price hedge issuer could face. By performing a backtest of a theoretical avocado producer from January 2000 to September 2023, the results show that the avocado producer could hedge the avocado price by 94%, with the hedge offered by a theoretical financial or government institution. Also, this issuer could balance the risk of such a hedge by buying a coffee–sugar futures portfolio. The cointegrated or long-term relationship shows that using such a futures portfolio is useful for Mexican Hass avocado price hedging. This paper stands as one of the first in testing futures portfolios to offer a synthetic hedge of non-commodities through a commodities’ futures portfolio. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Agricultural Economics, Policies and Rural Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Avocado’s production contribution to Mexico’s and Michoacán’s GDP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Historical values of the avocado price and the futures of interest.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Historical values of the avocado price vs. the portfolios with the best hedging effectiveness.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The historical investment level of the sugar–coffee simulated portfolio.</p>
Full article ">
30 pages, 3017 KiB  
Article
Application of a Robust Maximum Diversified Portfolio to a Small Economy’s Stock Market: An Application to Fiji’s South Pacific Stock Exchange
by Ronald Ravinesh Kumar, Hossein Ghanbari and Peter Josef Stauvermann
J. Risk Financial Manag. 2024, 17(9), 388; https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17090388 - 2 Sep 2024
Viewed by 788
Abstract
In this study, we apply a novel approach of portfolio diversification—the robust maximum diversified (RMD)—to a small and developing economy’s stock market. Using monthly returns data from August 2019 to May 2024 of 18/19 stocks listed on Fiji’s South Pacific Stock Exchange (SPX), [...] Read more.
In this study, we apply a novel approach of portfolio diversification—the robust maximum diversified (RMD)—to a small and developing economy’s stock market. Using monthly returns data from August 2019 to May 2024 of 18/19 stocks listed on Fiji’s South Pacific Stock Exchange (SPX), we construct the RMD portfolio and simulate with additional constraints. To implement the RMD portfolio, we replace the covariance matrix with a matrix comprising unexplained variations. The RMD procedure diversifies weights, and not risks, hence we need to run a pairwise regression between two assets (stocks) and extract the R-square to create a P-matrix. We compute each asset’s beta using the market-weighted price index, and the CAPM to calculate market-adjusted returns. Next, together with other benchmark portfolios (1/N, minimum variance, market portfolio, semi-variance, maximum skewness, and the most diversified portfolio), we examine the expected returns against the risk-free (RF) rate. From the simulations, in terms of expected return, we note that eight portfolios perform up to the RF rate. Specifically, for returns between 4 and 5%, we find that max. RMD with positive Sharpe and Sortino (as constraints) and the most diversified portfolio offer comparable returns, although the latter has slightly lower standard deviation and downside volatility and contains 94% of all the stocks. Portfolios with returns between 5% and the RF rate are the minimum-variance, the semi-variance, and the max. RMD with positive Sharpe; the latter coincides with the RF rate and contains the most (94%) stocks compared to the other two. An investor with a diversification objective, some risk tolerance and return preference up to the RF rate can consider the max. RMD with positive Sharpe. However, depending on the level of risk-averseness, the minimum-variance or the semi-variance portfolio can be considered, with the latter having lower downside volatility. Two portfolios offer returns above the RF rate—the market portfolio (max. Sharpe) and the maximum Sortino. Although the latter has the highest return, this portfolio is the least diversified and has the largest standard deviation and downside volatility. To achieve diversification and returns above the RF rate, the market portfolio should be considered. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Financial Markets, Financial Volatility and Beyond, 3rd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Market capitalization (%). Source: <a href="#B43-jrfm-17-00388" class="html-bibr">SPX</a> (<a href="#B43-jrfm-17-00388" class="html-bibr">2024a</a>, <a href="#B44-jrfm-17-00388" class="html-bibr">2024b</a>) and authors’ own computation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Max. volatility skewness. (<b>b</b>) Max. RMD portfolio. (<b>c</b>) 1/N portfolio. (<b>d</b>) Max. RMD with positive Sharpe and Sortino. (<b>e</b>) Most diversified portfolio. (<b>f</b>) Minimum variance portfolio. (<b>g</b>) Semi-variance portfolio. (<b>h</b>) Max. RMD with positive Sharpe. (<b>i</b>) Market portfolio (Max. Sharpe). (<b>j</b>) Maximum Sortino.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2 Cont.
<p>(<b>a</b>) Max. volatility skewness. (<b>b</b>) Max. RMD portfolio. (<b>c</b>) 1/N portfolio. (<b>d</b>) Max. RMD with positive Sharpe and Sortino. (<b>e</b>) Most diversified portfolio. (<b>f</b>) Minimum variance portfolio. (<b>g</b>) Semi-variance portfolio. (<b>h</b>) Max. RMD with positive Sharpe. (<b>i</b>) Market portfolio (Max. Sharpe). (<b>j</b>) Maximum Sortino.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2 Cont.
<p>(<b>a</b>) Max. volatility skewness. (<b>b</b>) Max. RMD portfolio. (<b>c</b>) 1/N portfolio. (<b>d</b>) Max. RMD with positive Sharpe and Sortino. (<b>e</b>) Most diversified portfolio. (<b>f</b>) Minimum variance portfolio. (<b>g</b>) Semi-variance portfolio. (<b>h</b>) Max. RMD with positive Sharpe. (<b>i</b>) Market portfolio (Max. Sharpe). (<b>j</b>) Maximum Sortino.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2 Cont.
<p>(<b>a</b>) Max. volatility skewness. (<b>b</b>) Max. RMD portfolio. (<b>c</b>) 1/N portfolio. (<b>d</b>) Max. RMD with positive Sharpe and Sortino. (<b>e</b>) Most diversified portfolio. (<b>f</b>) Minimum variance portfolio. (<b>g</b>) Semi-variance portfolio. (<b>h</b>) Max. RMD with positive Sharpe. (<b>i</b>) Market portfolio (Max. Sharpe). (<b>j</b>) Maximum Sortino.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2 Cont.
<p>(<b>a</b>) Max. volatility skewness. (<b>b</b>) Max. RMD portfolio. (<b>c</b>) 1/N portfolio. (<b>d</b>) Max. RMD with positive Sharpe and Sortino. (<b>e</b>) Most diversified portfolio. (<b>f</b>) Minimum variance portfolio. (<b>g</b>) Semi-variance portfolio. (<b>h</b>) Max. RMD with positive Sharpe. (<b>i</b>) Market portfolio (Max. Sharpe). (<b>j</b>) Maximum Sortino.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 1550 KiB  
Article
Developing an Audit Framework for Local Flood Risk Management Strategies: Is Increasing Surface Water Flood Risk in England Being Adequately Managed?
by Andrew Russell, Adam James McCue and Aakash Dipak Patel
Climate 2024, 12(7), 106; https://doi.org/10.3390/cli12070106 - 18 Jul 2024
Viewed by 1070
Abstract
Here, we investigate whether England’s 152 local flood risk management strategies (LFRMSs) satisfy minimal legislative criteria and address the growing surface water flood (SWF) risk caused by climate change. A systematic audit was used to assess the alignment of the LFRMSs with national [...] Read more.
Here, we investigate whether England’s 152 local flood risk management strategies (LFRMSs) satisfy minimal legislative criteria and address the growing surface water flood (SWF) risk caused by climate change. A systematic audit was used to assess the alignment of the LFRMSs with national climate change legislation and other relevant national strategies. An objective method to identify inclusion of a range of factors that good strategies should include was applied. LFRMSs are mostly meeting their minimum statutory requirements. However, there is a widespread issue across most LFRMSs regarding inadequate consideration of increasing SWF risk from climate changes, which highlights the need for enhanced LFRMSs by improved planning and climate change adaptation plans. There is some evidence of good practice within the LFRMS portfolio, which is discussed in the context of the ongoing LFRMS update process. Beyond England, there are implications for developing FRM processes at a local level that can be objectively assessed against national requirements. Communities in England face inadequately managed SWF risk in the future because of the range in plan quality across the LFRMSs. This research contributes to the ongoing examination of the full suite of 152 LFRMSs and, therefore, builds towards a complete assessment of the SWF management approach in England. This will help inform local climate change adaptation strategies that cater to the escalating threat of SWF due to climate change. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances of Flood Risk Assessment and Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Map of the 152 LLFAs in England. Light green areas indicate where an LLFA aligns with a local authority, and other colours indicate where an LLFA aligns with a different type of authority (most commonly a county council). The LFRMSs that were unavailable for this analysis (see <a href="#sec2dot3-climate-12-00106" class="html-sec">Section 2.3</a> are indicated by hatching. LFRMSs that cover more than one LLFA are indicated by stippling for the 4 local authorities that combined their LFRMS (Dudley, Sandwell, Walsall, and Wolverhampton) and common colours where local authorities and county councils combined their LFRMS (light blue for Blackpool, Blackburn with Darwen, and Lancashire in the north west; and dark green for Shropshire and Staffordshire in the west midlands).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>A summary of the audit questions with a Yes/No (green/red) or A/B/C (green/orange/red) answer. The audit questions have been abbreviated here from the full questions included in <a href="#climate-12-00106-t002" class="html-table">Table 2</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>A detailed presentation of the data collected from the audit. (<b>a</b>) Cumulative publication year data of the 1st and 2nd versions of the LFRMSs. (<b>b</b>) Horizontal lines representing the active period of the 141 LFRMSs examined. These are ordered vertically for the different LLFAs by the publication date of their most recent LFRMS. The line is green if the active period is explicit, orange if implied (i.e., it can be inferred from other information in the LFRMS), or red if it is not stated and not clear from other information. (<b>c</b>) Frequency distribution plot for the word counts of the 141 LFRMS. (<b>d</b>) Stacked bar graph showing the number of references in each LFRMS to a selection of resilience-focused FRM interventions: sustainable drainage systems—blue; property-level resilience—magenta; spatial planning—yellow; natural flood risk management/nature-based solutions—brown; flood warning systems—red; land management/upland water storage—green. The LFRMSs are ordered by word count, which is shown as the grey line. (<b>e</b>) As for (<b>d</b>), but examining stakeholders that should be consulted: water companies—blue; regional flood and coastal committees—magenta; riparian land owners—brown; the public—yellow; the Highways Agency—red; internal drainage boards—green. (<b>f</b>) As for (<b>d</b>), but examining policies and datasets that should be referred to: Flood and Water Management Act (2010)—blue; the Strategic Environmental Assessment—magenta; National FCERM Strategy—yellow; flood risk datasets—brown; National Planning Policy Framework—red; the local plan—green).</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 1602 KiB  
Article
Modeling of Mean-Value-at-Risk Investment Portfolio Optimization Considering Liabilities and Risk-Free Assets
by Sukono, Puspa Liza Binti Ghazali, Muhamad Deni Johansyah, Riaman, Riza Andrian Ibrahim, Mustafa Mamat and Aceng Sambas
Computation 2024, 12(6), 120; https://doi.org/10.3390/computation12060120 - 11 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1346
Abstract
This paper aims to design a quadratic optimization model of an investment portfolio based on value-at-risk (VaR) by entering risk-free assets and company liabilities. The designed model develops Markowitz’s investment portfolio optimization model with risk aversion. Model development was carried out using vector [...] Read more.
This paper aims to design a quadratic optimization model of an investment portfolio based on value-at-risk (VaR) by entering risk-free assets and company liabilities. The designed model develops Markowitz’s investment portfolio optimization model with risk aversion. Model development was carried out using vector and matrix equations. The entry of risk-free assets and liabilities is essential. Risk-free assets reduce the loss risk, while liabilities accommodate a fundamental analysis of the company’s condition. The model can be applied in various sectors of capital markets worldwide. This study applied the model to Indonesia’s mining and energy sector. The application results show that risk aversion negatively correlates with the mean and VaR of the return of investment portfolios. Assuming that risk aversion is in the 5.1% to 8.2% interval, the maximum mean and VaR obtained for the next month are 0.0103316 and 0.0138270, respectively, while the minimum mean and VaR are 0.0102964 and 0.0137975, respectively. The finding of this study is that the vector equation for investment portfolio weights is obtained, which can facilitate calculating investment portfolio weight optimization. This study is expected to help investors control the quality of appropriate investment, especially in some stocks in Indonesia’s mining and energy sector. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Efficient Portfolio Surface Graph.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The Relationship between Risk Aversion and Mean of the Portfolio Return.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The Relationship between Risk Aversion and the VaR of the Portfolio Return.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The Relationship between the VaR of the Portfolio Return and the Ratio.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 2137 KiB  
Article
Testing of Portfolio Optimization by Timor-Leste Portfolio Investment Strategy on the Stock Market
by Fernando Anuno, Mara Madaleno and Elisabete Vieira
J. Risk Financial Manag. 2024, 17(2), 78; https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17020078 - 18 Feb 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2877
Abstract
An efficient and effective portfolio provides maximum return potential with minimum risk by choosing an optimal balance among assets. Therefore, the objective of this study is to analyze the performance of optimized portfolios in minimizing risk and achieving maximum returns in the dynamics [...] Read more.
An efficient and effective portfolio provides maximum return potential with minimum risk by choosing an optimal balance among assets. Therefore, the objective of this study is to analyze the performance of optimized portfolios in minimizing risk and achieving maximum returns in the dynamics of Timor-Leste’s equity portfolio in the international capital market for the period from January 2006 to December 2019. The empirical findings of this study indicate that the correlation matrix showed that JPM has a very strong positive correlation with one of the twenty assets, namely BAC (0.80). Moreover, the optimal portfolio of the twenty stocks exceeding 10% consists of four consecutive stocks, namely DGE.L (10.69%), NSRGY (10.37%), JPM (10.04%), and T (10.03%). In addition, the minimum portfolio consists of two stocks with a minimum variance of more than 10%, namely SAP.DE (11.20%) and DGE.L (10.39%). The evaluation of the optimal portfolio using Markowitz parameters also showed that the highest expected return and the lowest risk were 1.22% and 3.12%, respectively. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Mathematics and Finance)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The evolution of the Petroleum Fund’s investment strategy.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Asset allocations by countries, 2019. Source: authors’ elaboration. Notes: Data range = maximum value minus minimum value for fixed-income securities (%) = 83.1 − 0.5 = 82.6; equities (%) = 62.7 − 0.1 = 62.6; portfolio (%)<a href="#fn001-jrfm-17-00078" class="html-fn">1</a> = 74.8 − 0.4 = 74.4. The portfolio (%) shows investments in other assets such as cash and private debt. Further information on the data ranges is in the <a href="#app1-jrfm-17-00078" class="html-app">Appendix A</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The monthly returns of the twenty stocks selected by Timor-Leste for investment in the capital market from 2006 to 2019. Source: authors’ calculation. Notes: The values on the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis are in months; the <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis represents the final values for each series of returns, which were later used to calculate the optimal portfolio. Thus, all 20 assets as shown in <a href="#jrfm-17-00078-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Correlation matrix. Source: authors’ calculation. *, **: Correlation is significant at the 0.05 (0.01) level (2-tailed).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Minimum variance portfolio weights. Source: authors’ elaboration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Tangency portfolio weights. Source: authors’ elaboration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Target return and risk (efficient frontier). Source: authors’ elaboration.</p>
Full article ">
32 pages, 2893 KiB  
Article
Managing the Intermittency of Wind Energy Generation in Greece
by Theodoros Christodoulou, Nikolaos S. Thomaidis, Stergios Kartsios and Ioannis Pytharoulis
Energies 2024, 17(4), 866; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17040866 - 13 Feb 2024
Viewed by 2083
Abstract
This paper performs a comprehensive analysis of the wind energy potential of onshore regions in Greece with emphasis on quantifying the volume risk and the spatial covariance structure. Optimization techniques are employed to derive efficient wind capacity allocation plans (also known as generation [...] Read more.
This paper performs a comprehensive analysis of the wind energy potential of onshore regions in Greece with emphasis on quantifying the volume risk and the spatial covariance structure. Optimization techniques are employed to derive efficient wind capacity allocation plans (also known as generation portfolios) incorporating different yield aspirations. The generation profile of minimum variance and other optimal portfolios along the efficient frontier are subject to rigorous evaluation using a fusion of descriptive and statistical methods. In particular, principal component analysis is employed to estimate factor models and investigate the spatiotemporal properties of wind power generation, providing valuable insights into the persistence of volume risk. The overarching goal of the study is to employ a set of statistical and mathematical programming tools guiding investors, aggregators and policy makers in their selection of wind energy generating assets. The findings of this research challenge the effectiveness of current policies and industry practices, offering a new perspective on wind energy harvesting with a focus on the management of volume risk. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Two wind power curve models: (<b>a</b>) the Vestas V112-3.3MW wind turbine power curve. (<b>b</b>) the McLean equivalent power curve model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Spatial assessment of Greek onshore wind resources: (<b>a</b>) mean generating capacity (<b>b</b>) standard deviation of generating capacity (<b>c</b>) average wind speed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The wind energy generation profile of the most and least productive regions in Greece. Shown is the distribution of (<b>a</b>) daily-averaged wind speeds in Exaplatanos (<b>b</b>) daily capacity factors in Exaplatanos (<b>c</b>) daily-averaged wind speeds in Lasithi (<b>d</b>) daily capacity factors in Lasithi.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The risk-yield trade-off of the wind energy generation profile of Greek sites: (<b>a</b>) all grid points. (<b>b</b>) variation with altitude.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Scree plot: percentage of total sample variance explained by each factor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Loading maps of onshore wind generation sites: (<b>a</b>) Factor 1. (<b>b</b>) Factor 2. (<b>c</b>) Factor 3. (<b>d</b>) Factor 4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Monthly box plots of the principal component scores: (<b>a</b>) Factor 1. (<b>b</b>) Factor 2. (<b>c</b>) Factor 3. (<b>d</b>) Factor 4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Sample autocorrelation functions of common risk factors: (<b>a</b>) Factor 1. (<b>b</b>) Factor 2. (<b>c</b>) Factor 3. (<b>d</b>) Factor 4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Factor loadings on selected areas: (<b>a</b>) Factor 1. (<b>b</b>) Factor 2. (<b>c</b>) Factor 3. (<b>d</b>) Factor 4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The incremental wind energy generation profile of a site in Chios: (<b>a</b>) Factor 1. (<b>b</b>) Factor 2. (<b>c</b>) Factor 3. (<b>d</b>) Factor 4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10 Cont.
<p>The incremental wind energy generation profile of a site in Chios: (<b>a</b>) Factor 1. (<b>b</b>) Factor 2. (<b>c</b>) Factor 3. (<b>d</b>) Factor 4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The incremental wind energy generation profile of a site in Giannitsa: (<b>a</b>) Factor 1. (<b>b</b>) Factor 2. (<b>c</b>) Factor 3. (<b>d</b>) Factor 4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The incremental wind energy generation profile of a site in Corfu: (<b>a</b>) Factor 1. (<b>b</b>) Factor 2. (<b>c</b>) Factor 3. (<b>d</b>) Factor 4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>A <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>σ</mi> </semantics></math>–<math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>μ</mi> </semantics></math> analysis of alternative wind energy harvesting plans.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>The minimum variance spatial allocation of wind generating capacity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Risk reduction index per (<b>a</b>) grid point and (<b>b</b>) efficient asset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Factor loadings on the MV portfolio: (<b>a</b>) Factor 1. (<b>b</b>) Factor 2. (<b>c</b>) Factor 3. (<b>d</b>) Factor 4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>The daily generating capacity distribution of six portfolios on the efficient frontier. (<b>a</b>) MV. (<b>b</b>) portfolio n.8. (<b>c</b>) portfolio n.16. (<b>d</b>) portfolio n.35. (<b>e</b>) portfolio n.42. (<b>f</b>) MY.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>(<b>a</b>) CV and percentage change in <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>σ</mi> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>μ</mi> </semantics></math> across the efficient frontier. (<b>b</b>) The position of selected portfolios on the efficient frontier.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>The evolution of the daily capacity factor for six representative portfolios of the efficient frontier: (<b>a</b>) MV. (<b>b</b>) portfolio n.8. (<b>c</b>) portfolio n.16. (<b>d</b>) portfolio n.35. (<b>e</b>) portfolio n.42. (<b>f</b>) MY.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>A seasonality analysis of daily capacity factors for six portfolios of the efficient frontier: (<b>a</b>) MV. (<b>b</b>) portfolio n.8. (<b>c</b>) portfolio n.16. (<b>d</b>) portfolio n.35. (<b>e</b>) portfolio n.42. (<b>f</b>) MY.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20 Cont.
<p>A seasonality analysis of daily capacity factors for six portfolios of the efficient frontier: (<b>a</b>) MV. (<b>b</b>) portfolio n.8. (<b>c</b>) portfolio n.16. (<b>d</b>) portfolio n.35. (<b>e</b>) portfolio n.42. (<b>f</b>) MY.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Two efficient wind capacity allocation plans: (<b>a</b>) portfolio n.8. (<b>b</b>) the efficient equally weighted portfolio.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 2295 KiB  
Article
Centrality-Based Equal Risk Contribution Portfolio
by Shreya Patki, Roy H. Kwon and Yuri Lawryshyn
Risks 2024, 12(1), 8; https://doi.org/10.3390/risks12010008 - 2 Jan 2024
Viewed by 2296
Abstract
This article combines the traditional definition of portfolio risk with minimum-spanning-tree-based “interconnectedness risk” to improve equal risk contribution portfolio performance. We use betweenness centrality to measure an asset’s importance in a market graph (network). After filtering the complete correlation network to a minimum [...] Read more.
This article combines the traditional definition of portfolio risk with minimum-spanning-tree-based “interconnectedness risk” to improve equal risk contribution portfolio performance. We use betweenness centrality to measure an asset’s importance in a market graph (network). After filtering the complete correlation network to a minimum spanning tree, we calculate the centrality score and convert it to a centrality heuristic. We develop an adjusted variance–covariance matrix using the centrality heuristic to bias the model to assign peripheral assets in the minimum spanning tree higher weights. We test this methodology using the constituents of the S&P 100 index. The results show that the centrality equal risk portfolio can improve upon the base equal risk portfolio returns, with a similar level of risk. We observe that during bear markets, the centrality-based portfolio can surpass the base equal risk portfolio risk. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Optimal Investment and Risk Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Portfolio Value from December 2003 to December 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Comparing Portfolio Value for Peripheral vs. Central Asset Portfolios.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>ERC Weight Distribution on MST.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Centrality ERC Weight Distribution on MST.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>MV Weight Distribution on MST.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Risk Contributions using <math display="inline"><semantics> <mo>Σ</mo> </semantics></math> Matrix.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 2938 KiB  
Article
Risk Spillovers and Network Connectedness between Clean Energy Stocks, Green Bonds, and Other Financial Assets: Evidence from China
by Guorong Chen, Shiyi Fang, Qibo Chen and Yun Zhang
Energies 2023, 16(20), 7077; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16207077 - 13 Oct 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1471
Abstract
As climate change impacts energy consumption, investments in clean energy are now associated with increased levels of risk and uncertainty. Consequently, the management of risk for clean energy investors has garnered significant academic attention. This study was designed to explore the risk transfers [...] Read more.
As climate change impacts energy consumption, investments in clean energy are now associated with increased levels of risk and uncertainty. Consequently, the management of risk for clean energy investors has garnered significant academic attention. This study was designed to explore the risk transfers among clean energy markets, how they respond to market volatility, and how exceptional events impact the risk spillover. This was performed by examining the risk spillover of and asymmetric connectedness between clean energy markets, green bonds, and other financial markets in China, in line with the connectedness framework and minimum spanning tree technique. The findings revealed that clean energy markets exhibit heterogeneity in terms of the direction and magnitude of net risk spillover, the types of hedging assets involved, and their response to market volatility. Exceptional events, such as the Russian–Ukrainian conflict and COVID-19 pandemic, have an impact on the spillover relationships. During stable market conditions, green bonds experience fewer spillovers from clean energy markets, whereas, in times of volatility, gold markets are subjected to fewer spillovers. In the time domain, the overall long-term spillover is stronger compared to the short and medium terms. In the frequency domain, there is a significant risk of low-frequency transmission. These findings hold practical implications for energy investors in portfolio construction and for policymakers in pursuing sustainability objectives. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Descriptive statistics of realized volatility in clean energy assets and financial markets. Notes: It shows that the means of almost all markets except Was are close to zero. Grb has the lowest standard deviation, while Pho and Wind the largest.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Dynamics of the total spillover index. Notes: The time evolution of spillover index was estimated using a 150-day rolling window. It demonstrates the strong fluctuation of correlation levels. The whole period can be divided into four phases: 2015–2019, 2020–2021, 2021–2022, after 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Net volatility spillover network connectedness among clean energy market and other financial markets in three periods: (<b>a</b>) 2015–2022 asset connectedness; (<b>b</b>) 2015–2019 asset connectedness; (<b>c</b>) 2020–2022 asset connectedness. Notes: the colors of the arrows represent the magnitude of risk spillover between two nodes, ranging from purple (strongest) to pink and to white (weakest). Wider arrows indicate higher connectedness. The nodes are colored blue on the receptor side and yellow on the transmitter side. The node’s diameter corresponds to the “TO” or “FROM” spillover level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Minimum spanning tree of markets. Notes: Colors represent clusters, and lines between nodes represent connectedness. It reveals that Grb, Gold, and Ener belong to the same community. Elec connects to the largest number of other industries.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Time-varying directional volatility spillover of each particular market: “TO others”. Notes: “TO others” refers to the risk spillover transmitted from the specified market to other markets.</p>
Full article ">Figure A2
<p>Time-varying directional volatility spillover of each particular market: “FROM others”. Notes: “FROM others” refers to the risk spillover transmitted from other markets to the specified market.</p>
Full article ">Figure A3
<p>Time-varying directional volatility spillover of each particular market: “NET spillover”. Notes: “NET spillover” refers to the difference between the “TO others” and “FROM others” spillovers, representing the net spillover transmitted from the specified market to other markets.</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 390 KiB  
Article
Lossless Transformations and Excess Risk Bounds in Statistical Inference
by László Györfi, Tamás Linder and Harro Walk
Entropy 2023, 25(10), 1394; https://doi.org/10.3390/e25101394 - 28 Sep 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1169
Abstract
We study the excess minimum risk in statistical inference, defined as the difference between the minimum expected loss when estimating a random variable from an observed feature vector and the minimum expected loss when estimating the same random variable from a transformation (statistic) [...] Read more.
We study the excess minimum risk in statistical inference, defined as the difference between the minimum expected loss when estimating a random variable from an observed feature vector and the minimum expected loss when estimating the same random variable from a transformation (statistic) of the feature vector. After characterizing lossless transformations, i.e., transformations for which the excess risk is zero for all loss functions, we construct a partitioning test statistic for the hypothesis that a given transformation is lossless, and we show that for i.i.d. data the test is strongly consistent. More generally, we develop information-theoretic upper bounds on the excess risk that uniformly hold over fairly general classes of loss functions. Based on these bounds, we introduce the notion of a δ-lossless transformation and give sufficient conditions for a given transformation to be universally δ-lossless. Applications to classification, nonparametric regression, portfolio strategies, information bottlenecks, and deep learning are also surveyed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Information and Coding Theory II)
19 pages, 2795 KiB  
Article
Machine Learning in Forecasting Motor Insurance Claims
by Thomas Poufinas, Periklis Gogas, Theophilos Papadimitriou and Emmanouil Zaganidis
Risks 2023, 11(9), 164; https://doi.org/10.3390/risks11090164 - 18 Sep 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 9859
Abstract
Accurate forecasting of insurance claims is of the utmost importance for insurance activity as the evolution of claims determines cash outflows and the pricing, and thus the profitability, of the underlying insurance coverage. These are used as inputs when the insurance company drafts [...] Read more.
Accurate forecasting of insurance claims is of the utmost importance for insurance activity as the evolution of claims determines cash outflows and the pricing, and thus the profitability, of the underlying insurance coverage. These are used as inputs when the insurance company drafts its business plan and determines its risk appetite, and the respective solvency capital required (by the regulators) to absorb the assumed risks. The conventional claim forecasting methods attempt to fit (each of) the claims frequency and severity with a known probability distribution function and use it to project future claims. This study offers a fresh approach in insurance claims forecasting. First, we introduce two novel sets of variables, i.e., weather conditions and car sales, and second, we employ a battery of Machine Learning (ML) algorithms (Support Vector Machines—SVM, Decision Trees, Random Forests, and Boosting) to forecast the average (mean) insurance claim per insured car per quarter. Finally, we identify the variables that are the most influential in forecasting insurance claims. Our dataset comes from the motor portfolio of an insurance company operating in Athens, Greece and spans a period from 2008 to 2020. We found evidence that the three most informative variables pertain to the new car sales with a 3-quarter and 1-quarter lag and the minimum temperature of Elefsina (one of the weather stations in Athens) with a 3-quarter lag. Among the models tested, Random Forest with limited depth and XGboost run on the 15 most informative variables, and these exhibited the best performance. These findings can be useful in the hands of insurers as they can consider the weather conditions and the new car sales among the parameters that are considered to perform claims forecasting. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The time series of the mean insurance claims per insured car on a quarterly basis. In the background we depict the situation of the Greek economy: Unshaded areas represent periods of real GDP growth, while shaded areas represent periods of negative real GDP growth (real output contractions). Source: Based on authors estimates with data from the motor insurance portfolio.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>A graphical representation of cross-validation with three folds. Source: Created by the authors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The Support Vector Paradigm. The gray area is the ε tolerance band around the regression line. Any point inside the gray area does not affect the objective function. Every point outside the gray zone adds <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>ζ</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> to the objective function of the minimization. The marginal black points in the gray zone are the Support Vectors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The kernel tricks in a non-linear case, taken from the Scikit-learn page. The black data points are approximated using the standard SVR (linear kernel), the polynomial kernel, and the RBF (Radial Basis Function) kernel. For the two kernel cases, the data are projected in another dimension where the regression is linear. When the regression line is returned in the initial data space it takes the form of the blue (polynomial) and green (RBF) line. <a href="https://ogrisel.github.io/scikit-learn.org/sklearn-tutorial/auto_examples/svm/plot_svm_regression.html" target="_blank">https://ogrisel.github.io/scikit-learn.org/sklearn-tutorial/auto_examples/svm/plot_svm_regression.html</a> (accessed on 12 September 2023).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>A graphical representation of Decision Trees. Every decision node is an if statement regarding one of the variables on the set. Every leaf node corresponds to a final value for the regression.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The depiction of a 600-tree Random Forest. The average of the 600 predictions is the final prediction of the Random Forest. The graphic was taken from <a href="https://levelup.gitconnected.com/random-forest-regression-209c0f354c84" target="_blank">https://levelup.gitconnected.com/random-forest-regression-209c0f354c84</a> (accessed on 12 September 2023).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The basic concept of the combination of many weak learners to create a strong one using boosting. The information from the previous weak learners is incorporated by the size of the data points. The large data points correspond to points that were not correctly classified by the previous learners; the small ones describe the opposite case. Each of the three weak learners is unable to correctly classify the two classes, though their combination into a strong learner is successful. (<a href="https://livebook.manning.com/book/grokking-machine-learning/chapter-10/v-9/45" target="_blank">https://livebook.manning.com/book/grokking-machine-learning/chapter-10/v-9/45</a>) (accessed on 12 September 2023).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The actual and the forecasted values from the best model. Source: Based on authors estimates with data from the motor insurance portfolio, the HNMS (2022) and the Association of Motor Vehicles Importers Representatives (2022).</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 3382 KiB  
Article
Dynamic Dependency between the Shariah and Traditional Stock Markets: Diversification Opportunities during the COVID-19 and Global Financial Crisis (GFC) Periods
by Mosab I. Tabash, Mohammad Sahabuddin, Fatima Muhammad Abdulkarim, Basem Hamouri and Dang Khoa Tran
Economies 2023, 11(5), 149; https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11050149 - 17 May 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2365
Abstract
The aim of the present research is to highlight whether there exist any diversification opportunities from investing in developed and developing countries’ Shariah-compliant and non-Shariah-compliant stock markets during global financial crisis (GFC) and the COVID-19 pandemic periods. For this purpose, we employ daily [...] Read more.
The aim of the present research is to highlight whether there exist any diversification opportunities from investing in developed and developing countries’ Shariah-compliant and non-Shariah-compliant stock markets during global financial crisis (GFC) and the COVID-19 pandemic periods. For this purpose, we employ daily data for both Shariah and non-Shariah indices from 29 October 2007 to 31 December 2021. The study uses multivariate GARCH-DCC and wavelet approaches to examine if there exist diversification opportunities in the selected markets. Evidence from this study shows that although the developing markets’ stock returns experience high volatility of a similar degree, the conventional indices of Malaysia have the highest volatility among them. This shows that Shariah indices have less exposure to risk and higher possibilities of diversification compared to their conventional counterparts. Regarding developed markets, the Japanese conventional index and the U.S. Shariah indices are more volatile compared to other indices in the market. Moreover, the results of the wavelet power spectrum show significant and higher volatility during the COVID-19 pandemic rather than the GFC. Similarly, the Chinese conventional market experienced minimum variance during the GFC and COVID-19 pandemic period. On the other hand, the results of wavelet-coherence transform indicate that the Japanese Shariah-based market offered better portfolio opportunities for U.S. traders during the GFC and the COVID-19 pandemic periods. Hence, opportunities for investment in this selected market are basically close to zero. Therefore, investors should carefully choose which stocks they can include in their investment portfolio. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Role of Islamic Finance in Modern Economy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Shariah and traditional stock indices’ return movement.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Plots of volatilities for developing Shariah and traditional stock market returns. (<b>A</b>–<b>D</b>) show the conditional volatility between Shariah and traditional stock returns for developing markets.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Plots of conditional correlations for developing Shariah and traditional stock market returns. (<b>A</b>–<b>D</b>) show the conditional correlations between Shariah and traditional stock returns for developing markets.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Plots of volatilities for developed traditional stock market returns. (<b>A</b>–<b>D</b>) show the conditional volatility between Shariah and traditional stock returns for developed markets.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Plots of conditional correlations for developed Shariah and traditional stock market returns. (<b>A</b>–<b>D</b>) show the conditional correlations between Shariah and traditional stock returns for developed markets.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>WPS for the developed economies between the Shariah and traditional markets.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6 Cont.
<p>WPS for the developed economies between the Shariah and traditional markets.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>WPS for the developing economies between the Shariah and traditional markets.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7 Cont.
<p>WPS for the developing economies between the Shariah and traditional markets.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>WCT for the developed economies between the Shariah and traditional markets.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>WCT for the developing economies between the Shariah and traditional markets.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9 Cont.
<p>WCT for the developing economies between the Shariah and traditional markets.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 1528 KiB  
Article
A Robust Model for Portfolio Management of Microgrid Operator in the Balancing Market
by Meysam Khojasteh, Pedro Faria, Fernando Lezama and Zita Vale
Energies 2023, 16(4), 1700; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16041700 - 8 Feb 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1591
Abstract
The stochastic nature of renewable energy resources and consumption has the potential to threaten the balance between generation and consumption as well as to cause instability in power systems. The microgrid operators (MGOs) are financially responsible for compensating for the imbalance of power [...] Read more.
The stochastic nature of renewable energy resources and consumption has the potential to threaten the balance between generation and consumption as well as to cause instability in power systems. The microgrid operators (MGOs) are financially responsible for compensating for the imbalance of power within their portfolio. The imbalance of power can be supplied by rescheduling flexible resources or participating in the balancing market. This paper presents a robust optimization (RO)-based model to maintain the balance of a portfolio according to uncertainties in renewable power generation and consumption. Furthermore, load reduction (LR) and battery energy storage (BES) are considered flexible resources of the MGO on the consumption side. The model is formulated based on the minimax decision rule that determines the minimum cost of balancing based on the worst-case realizations of uncertain parameters. Through the strong duality theory and big-M theory, the proposed minimax model is transformed into a single-level linear maximization problem. The proposed model is tested on a six-node microgrid test system. The main contributions of the proposed model are presenting a robust model for portfolio management of MGO and using BES and LR to improve the flexibility of microgrid. Simulation results demonstrate that using LR and BES could decrease the balancing cost. However, the optimal portfolio management to compensate for the imbalance of power is highly dependent on the risk preferences of MGO. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Providing the balancing service by MGO.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Six-node test system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Variations of wind power and demand.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Balancing prices in Area1 (n1, n2, n3) and Area2 (n4, n4, n6).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Impact of tie-line capacity on balance price.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Impact of budget of uncertainty (MW) on balancing cost and price.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 1664 KiB  
Article
Pricing and Hedging Index Options under Mean-Variance Criteria in Incomplete Markets
by Pornnapat Yamphram, Phiraphat Sutthimat and Udomsak Rakwongwan
Computation 2023, 11(2), 30; https://doi.org/10.3390/computation11020030 - 7 Feb 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2350
Abstract
This paper studies the portfolio selection problem where tradable assets are a bank account, and standard put and call options are written on the S&P 500 index in incomplete markets in which there exist bid–ask spreads and finite liquidity. The problem is mathematically [...] Read more.
This paper studies the portfolio selection problem where tradable assets are a bank account, and standard put and call options are written on the S&P 500 index in incomplete markets in which there exist bid–ask spreads and finite liquidity. The problem is mathematically formulated as an optimization problem where the variance of the portfolio is perceived as a risk. The task is to find the portfolio which has a satisfactory return but has the minimum variance. The underlying is modeled by a variance gamma process which can explain the extreme price movement of the asset. We also study how the optimized portfolio changes subject to a user’s views of the future asset price. Moreover, the optimization model is extended for asset pricing and hedging. To illustrate the technique, we compute indifference prices for buying and selling six options namely a European call option, a quadratic option, a sine option, a butterfly spread option, a digital option, and a log option, and propose the hedging portfolios, which are the portfolios one needs to hold to minimize risk from selling or buying such options, for all the options. The sensitivity of the price from modeling parameters is also investigated. Our hedging strategies are decent with the symmetry property of the kernel density estimation of the portfolio payout. The payouts of the hedging portfolios are very close to those of the bought or sold options. The results shown in this study are just illustrations of the techniques. The approach can also be used for other derivatives products with known payoffs in other financial markets. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quantitative Finance and Risk Management Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Optimized portfolio in the put options (<b>left</b>) and the call options (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The payoffs of the optimal portfolios as functions of the S&amp;P 500 index.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The coefficient frontier of the variance minimization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The payoffs of the optimized portfolios as functions of the index value at the expiry date obtained with <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>σ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.2</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>σ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.3</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>left</b>), and the kernel density of the payoff of at the optimized portfolios obtained with 10,000 out-of-sample simulations (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The minimum standard deviation of the portfolio payout distribution with <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.2</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>0.1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>0.05</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>left</b>), the kernel density estimation of the portfolio payout with <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.2</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>0.1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>0.05</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The transaction cost of the portfolio payout.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The payoffs of the optimized portfolios obtained with <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>ν</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>left</b>) and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>ν</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.00001</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The payoff of the hedging portfolio together with the payoff of the claim being priced of a call option (<b>left</b>), the hedging portfolios for the put option (<b>center</b>) and call option (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The payoff of the hedging portfolio together with the payoff of the claim being priced of a quadratic option (<b>left</b>), the hedging portfolios for the put option (<b>center</b>) and call option (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The payoff of the hedging portfolio together with the payoff of the claim being priced of a log-option (<b>left</b>), the hedging portfolios for the put option (<b>center</b>) and call option (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The payoff of the hedging portfolio together with the payoff of the claim being priced of a price digital (<b>left</b>), the hedging portfolios for the put option (<b>center</b>) and call option (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The payoff of the hedging portfolio with the payoff of the claim being priced of a butterfly spread option (<b>left</b>), the hedging portfolios for the put option (<b>center</b>) and call option (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>The payoff of the hedging portfolio together with the payoff of the claim being priced of a sine option (<b>left</b>), the hedging portfolios for the put option (<b>center</b>) and call option (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop