Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (2,971)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = ML algorithm

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
17 pages, 1656 KiB  
Article
Improving Alzheimer’s Disease Prediction with Different Machine Learning Approaches and Feature Selection Techniques
by Hala Alshamlan, Arwa Alwassel, Atheer Banafa and Layan Alsaleem
Diagnostics 2024, 14(19), 2237; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14192237 - 7 Oct 2024
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) has increasingly been utilized in healthcare to facilitate disease diagnosis and prediction. This study focuses on predicting Alzheimer’s disease (AD) through the development and comparison of ML models using Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and Logistic Regression (LR) [...] Read more.
Machine learning (ML) has increasingly been utilized in healthcare to facilitate disease diagnosis and prediction. This study focuses on predicting Alzheimer’s disease (AD) through the development and comparison of ML models using Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and Logistic Regression (LR) algorithms. Additionally, feature selection techniques including Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR) and Mutual Information (MI) were employed to enhance the model performance. The research methodology involved training and testing these models on the OASIS-2 dataset, evaluating their predictive accuracies. Notably, LR combined with mRMR achieved the highest accuracy of 99.08% in predicting AD. These findings underscore the efficacy of ML algorithms in AD prediction and highlight the utility of the feature selection methods in improving the model performance. This study contributes to the ongoing efforts to leverage ML for more accurate disease prognosis and underscores the potential of these techniques in advancing clinical decision-making. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The result of first 5 rows.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Descriptive statistics of the participant demographics within the dataset. (<b>a</b>) The distribution of group classifications. (<b>b</b>) The gender representation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Histograms illustrating the distribution of socioeconomic status. (<b>a</b>) SES scores among participants. (<b>b</b>) MMSE scores among participants.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Boxplots representing the distribution and variability of numeric attributes within the dataset, facilitating the identification of potential outliers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Probability plot depicting the distribution of MMSE scores, highlighting the assessment of cognitive function among participants.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Visualization of feature selection results using mRMR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Heat map of correlation coefficient feature selection.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Mutual Information feature selection.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Performance comparison of the SVM model. (<b>a</b>) Accuracy before outlier removal. (<b>b</b>) Accuracy after outlier removal.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Performance comparison of the LR model. (<b>a</b>) Accuracy before outlier removal. (<b>b</b>) Accuracy after outlier removal.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Performance comparison of the RF model. (<b>a</b>) Accuarcy before outlier removal. (<b>b</b>) Accuracy after outlier removal.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Illustration of the 10-fold cross-validation process, showing the division of the dataset into 10 equal-sized folds for model evaluation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Illustration of the 5-fold cross-validation process, demonstrating the partitioning of the dataset into five subsets for model evaluation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Illustration of the Leave-One-Out (LOO) cross-validation method, depicting the evaluation process where each individual data point serves as a separate validation set.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Comparison of SVM model performance. (<b>a</b>) Accuracy prior to outlier removal. (<b>b</b>) Accuracy following outlier removal.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Comparison of LR model performance. (<b>a</b>) Accuracy prior to outlier removal. (<b>b</b>) Accuracy following outlier removal.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Comparison of Random Forest model performance. (<b>a</b>) Accuracy prior to outlier removal. (<b>b</b>) Accuracy following outlier removal.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 526 KiB  
Article
Assessment of Ensemble-Based Machine Learning Algorithms for Exoplanet Identification
by Thiago S. F. Luz, Rodrigo A. S. Braga and Enio R. Ribeiro
Electronics 2024, 13(19), 3950; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13193950 - 7 Oct 2024
Abstract
This paper presents a comprehensive assessment procedure for evaluating Ensemble-based Machine Learning algorithms in the context of exoplanet classification. Each of the algorithm hyperparameter values were tuned. Deployments were carried out using the cross-validation method. Performance metrics, including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and [...] Read more.
This paper presents a comprehensive assessment procedure for evaluating Ensemble-based Machine Learning algorithms in the context of exoplanet classification. Each of the algorithm hyperparameter values were tuned. Deployments were carried out using the cross-validation method. Performance metrics, including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1 score, were evaluated using confusion matrices generated from each implementation. Machine Learning (ML) algorithms were trained and used to identify exoplanet data. Most of the current research deals with traditional ML algorithms for this purpose. The Ensemble algorithm is another type of ML technique that combines the prediction performance of two or more algorithms to obtain an improved final prediction. Few studies have applied Ensemble algorithms to predict exoplanets. To the best of our knowledge, no paper that has exclusively assessed Ensemble algorithms exists, highlighting a significant gap in the literature about the potential of Ensemble methods. Five Ensemble algorithms were evaluated in this paper: Adaboost, Random Forest, Stacking, Random Subspace Method, and Extremely Randomized Trees. They achieved an average performance of more than 80% in all metrics. The results underscore the substantial benefits of fine tuning hyperparameters to enhance predictive performance. The Stacking algorithm achieved a higher performance than the other algorithms. This aspect is discussed in this paper. The results of this work show that it is worth increasing the use of Ensemble algorithms to improve exoplanet identification. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Computer Science & Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Ensemble algorithm concept for predicting data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Confusion matrix with the (<b>a</b>) initial and (<b>b</b>) improved hyperparameter values for Adaboost.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Confusion matrix with the (<b>a</b>) initial and (<b>b</b>) improved hyperparameter values for Random Forest.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Confusion matrix for the (<b>a</b>) first and (<b>b</b>) second implementation of Stacking.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Accuracy results for the algorithms tested as estimators for Stacking.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Confusion matrix with the (<b>a</b>) initial and (<b>b</b>) improved hyperparameter values for the Random Subspace Method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Confusion matrix with the (<b>a</b>) initial and (<b>b</b>) improved hyperparameter values for Extremely Randomized Trees.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 4521 KiB  
Article
Hybrid Machine-Learning Model for Accurate Prediction of Filtration Volume in Water-Based Drilling Fluids
by Shadfar Davoodi, Mohammed Al-Rubaii, David A. Wood, Mohammed Al-Shargabi, Mohammad Mehrad and Valeriy S. Rukavishnikov
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(19), 9035; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14199035 - 7 Oct 2024
Viewed by 262
Abstract
Accurately predicting the filtration volume (FV) in drilling fluid (DF) is crucial for avoiding drilling problems such as a stuck pipe and minimizing DF impacts on formations during drilling. Traditional FV measurement relies on human-centric experimental evaluation, which is time-consuming. Recently, machine learning [...] Read more.
Accurately predicting the filtration volume (FV) in drilling fluid (DF) is crucial for avoiding drilling problems such as a stuck pipe and minimizing DF impacts on formations during drilling. Traditional FV measurement relies on human-centric experimental evaluation, which is time-consuming. Recently, machine learning (ML) proved itself as a promising approach for FV prediction. However, existing ML methods require time-consuming input variables, hindering the semi-real-time monitoring of the FV. Therefore, employing radial basis function neural network (RBFNN) and multilayer extreme learning machine (MELM) algorithms integrated with the growth optimizer (GO), predictive hybrid ML (HML) models are developed to reliably predict the FV using only two easy-to-measure input variables: drilling fluid density (FD) and Marsh funnel viscosity (MFV). A 1260-record dataset from seventeen wells drilled in two oil and gas fields (Iran) was used to evaluate the models. Results showed the superior performance of the RBFNN-GO model, achieving a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 0.6396 mL. Overfitting index (OFI), score, dependency, and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analysis confirmed the superior FV prediction performance of the RBFNN-GO model. In addition, the low RMSE (0.3227 mL) of the RBFNN-NGO model on unseen data from a different well within the studied fields confirmed the strong generalizability of this rapid and novel FV prediction method. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Petroleum and Gas Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flowchart of the procedure applied for developing simple and hybrid ML models to predict FV in DF from two easily measured input variables, FD and MFV.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Applying the GO algorithm to determine optimal hyperparameter values for the RBFNN predictor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Flowchart illustrating the implementation of the MELM-GO hybrid ML model designed for predicting the FV properties of DFs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Heatmap correlation matrix displaying the relationships between independent and dependent parameters for the compiled dataset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>RMSE results for the FV dataset evaluated with the RBFNN model with three training/testing subset separation ratios.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Identification of outliers in the FV training dataset using GPR–Mahalanobis distance (MD) modeling.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The iterative reduction of RMSE within various iterations of the GO algorithm is employed to ascertain the optimal structure of the MELM algorithm in the prediction of the FV.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Comparative cross-plots evaluating accuracy of measured and predicted FV values utilizing (<b>a</b>) MELM, (<b>b</b>) MELM-GO, (<b>c</b>) RBFNN, and (<b>d</b>) RBFNN-GO models on training data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8 Cont.
<p>Comparative cross-plots evaluating accuracy of measured and predicted FV values utilizing (<b>a</b>) MELM, (<b>b</b>) MELM-GO, (<b>c</b>) RBFNN, and (<b>d</b>) RBFNN-GO models on training data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Assessment of the error convergence of GO algorithm iteration sequences for the two HML models configured to predict the FV.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparative cross-plot accuracy evaluations of measured and predicted FV values achieved by the trained (<b>a</b>) MELM, (<b>b</b>) MELM-GO, (<b>c</b>) RBFNN, and (<b>d</b>) RBFNN-GO models applied to the testing data subset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Radar chart contrasting prediction scores achieved by standalone ML and HML models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Relationships between the percentage of added noise to the input variable distributions and R<sup>2</sup> values for FV predictions for the ML and HML models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Visualizing the effect of the two input features on the FV predictions with SHAP values for the RBFNN-GO model applied to the training subset: (<b>a</b>) SHAP detailed feature impact plot and (<b>b</b>) SHAP summary plot of the feature importance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>The (<b>a</b>) 3D and (<b>b</b>) 2D heat map partial dependence plots showcasing the interplay between pairs of input features in the predictions of the FV as generated by the RBFNN-GO model applied to the training subset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Comparison of the measured FV values with those predicted by the RBFNN-GO model for the unseen data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Workflow diagram demonstrating how the configured HML models can be applied in the DF well-site laboratory to assist the drilling crew with FV semi-real-time monitoring and decision making.</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 778 KiB  
Systematic Review
Advancing Patient Safety: The Future of Artificial Intelligence in Mitigating Healthcare-Associated Infections: A Systematic Review
by Davide Radaelli, Stefano Di Maria, Zlatko Jakovski, Djordje Alempijevic, Ibrahim Al-Habash, Monica Concato, Matteo Bolcato and Stefano D’Errico
Healthcare 2024, 12(19), 1996; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12191996 - 6 Oct 2024
Viewed by 214
Abstract
Background: Healthcare-associated infections are infections that patients acquire during hospitalization or while receiving healthcare in other facilities. They represent the most frequent negative outcome in healthcare, can be entirely prevented, and pose a burden in terms of financial and human costs. With the [...] Read more.
Background: Healthcare-associated infections are infections that patients acquire during hospitalization or while receiving healthcare in other facilities. They represent the most frequent negative outcome in healthcare, can be entirely prevented, and pose a burden in terms of financial and human costs. With the development of new AI and ML algorithms, hospitals could develop new and automated surveillance and prevention models for HAIs, leading to improved patient safety. The aim of this review is to systematically retrieve, collect, and summarize all available information on the application and impact of AI in HAI surveillance and/or prevention. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature using PubMed and Scopus to find articles related to the implementation of artificial intelligence in the surveillance and/or prevention of HAIs. Results: We identified a total of 218 articles, of which only 35 were included in the review. Most studies were conducted in the US (n = 10, 28.6%) and China (n = 5; 14.3%) and were published between 2021 and 2023 (26 articles, 74.3%) with an increasing trend over time. Most focused on the development of ML algorithms for the identification/prevention of surgical site infections (n = 18; 51%), followed by HAIs in general (n = 9; 26%), hospital-acquired urinary tract infections (n = 5; 9%), and healthcare-associated pneumonia (n = 3; 9%). Only one study focused on the proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE) and included healthcare workers as the study population. Overall, the trend indicates that several AI/ML models can effectively assist clinicians in everyday decisions, by identifying HAIs early or preventing them through personalized risk factors with good performance. However, only a few studies have reported an actual implementation of these models, which proved highly successful. In one case, manual workload was reduced by nearly 85%, while another study observed a decrease in the local hospital’s HAI incidence from 1.31% to 0.58%. Conclusions: AI has significant potential to improve the prevention, diagnosis, and management of healthcare-associated infections, offering benefits such as increased accuracy, reduced workloads, and cost savings. Although some AI applications have already been tested and validated, adoption in healthcare is hindered by barriers such as high implementation costs, technological limitations, and resistance from healthcare workers. Overcoming these challenges could allow AI to be more widely and cost-effectively integrated, ultimately improving patient care and infection management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Healthcare Quality and Patient Safety)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>PRISMA flow diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Number of studies conducted by type of HAI.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 2391 KiB  
Article
A Machine Learning Approach for Predicting Pedaling Force Profile in Cycling
by Reza Ahmadi, Shahram Rasoulian, Samira Fazeli Veisari, Atousa Parsaei, Hamidreza Heidary, Walter Herzog and Amin Komeili
Sensors 2024, 24(19), 6440; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24196440 - 4 Oct 2024
Viewed by 342
Abstract
Accurate measurement of pedaling kinetics and kinematics is vital for optimizing rehabilitation, exercise training, and understanding musculoskeletal biomechanics. Pedal reaction force, the main external force in cycling, is essential for musculoskeletal modeling and closely correlates with lower-limb muscle activity and joint reaction forces. [...] Read more.
Accurate measurement of pedaling kinetics and kinematics is vital for optimizing rehabilitation, exercise training, and understanding musculoskeletal biomechanics. Pedal reaction force, the main external force in cycling, is essential for musculoskeletal modeling and closely correlates with lower-limb muscle activity and joint reaction forces. However, sensor instrumentation like 3-axis pedal force sensors is costly and requires extensive postprocessing. Recent advancements in machine learning (ML), particularly neural network (NN) models, provide promising solutions for kinetic analyses. In this study, an NN model was developed to predict radial and mediolateral forces, providing a low-cost solution to study pedaling biomechanics with stationary cycling ergometers. Fifteen healthy individuals performed a 2 min pedaling task at two different self-selected (58 ± 5 RPM) and higher (72 ± 7 RPM) cadences. Pedal forces were recorded using a 3-axis force system. The dataset included pedal force, crank angle, cadence, power, and participants’ weight and height. The NN model achieved an inter-subject normalized root mean square error (nRMSE) of 0.15 ± 0.02 and 0.26 ± 0.05 for radial and mediolateral forces at high cadence, respectively, and 0.20 ± 0.04 and 0.22 ± 0.04 at self-selected cadence. The NN model’s low computational time suits real-time pedal force predictions, matching the accuracy of previous ML algorithms for estimating ground reaction forces in gait. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Signal Processing and Machine Learning for Sensor Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The flowchart for developing the ML model in the present study. After calibrating sensors, data collection was conducted, and the recorded data were preprocessed for feature extraction. An NN was trained to predict radial and mediolateral forces.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The crank angle was measured from the horizontal position. The radial and tangential forces were measured along and perpendicular to the crank axis, respectively. The mediolateral force was perpendicular to the radial and tangential forces.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The NN structure consisted of five inputs, including cycling power, cadence, crank angle, and subject weight and height. The output prediction was radial and mediolateral forces.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Radial force prediction using the developed ML methods: intra-subject (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) and inter-subject (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) analyses. Radial forces were predicted at self-selected (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) and high (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) cadences from the cross-validation set. A schematic representation of the pedal position is shown next to the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis in subfigure (<b>c</b>). The lines represent the mean values, while the shaded areas indicate the standard deviations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Mediolateral force prediction using the developed ML methods: intra-subject (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) and inter-subject (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) analyses. Mediolateral forces were predicted at self-selected (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) and high (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) cadences from the cross-validation set. A schematic representation of the pedal position is shown next to the x-axis in subfigure (<b>c</b>). The lines represent the mean values, while the shaded areas indicate the standard deviations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The mean ± SD values for all force components (radial, mediolateral, and tangential) were measured by advanced 3-axis pedal force sensors, highlighting the contribution of each component in resultant pedal reaction force. The lines represent the mean values, while the shaded areas indicate the standard deviations.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 7805 KiB  
Article
Machine Learning Approach for Local Atmospheric Emission Predictions
by Alessandro Marongiu, Gabriele Giuseppe Distefano, Marco Moretti, Federico Petrosino, Giuseppe Fossati, Anna Gilia Collalto and Elisabetta Angelino
Air 2024, 2(4), 380-401; https://doi.org/10.3390/air2040022 - 3 Oct 2024
Viewed by 292
Abstract
This paper presents a novel machine learning methodology able to extend the results of detailed local emission inventories to larger domains where emission estimates are not available. The first part of this work consists in the development of an emission inventory of elemental [...] Read more.
This paper presents a novel machine learning methodology able to extend the results of detailed local emission inventories to larger domains where emission estimates are not available. The first part of this work consists in the development of an emission inventory of elemental carbon (EC), black carbon (BC), organic carbon (OC), and levoglucosan (LG) obtained from the detailed emission estimates available from the Project LIFE PREPAIR for the Po Basin in north Italy. The emissions of these chemical species in combination with particulate primary emissions and gaseous precursors are very important information in source apportionment and in the impact assessment of the different emission sources in air quality. To gain a better understanding of the origins of atmospheric pollution, it is possible to combine measurements with emission estimates for the particulate matter fractions known as EC, BC, OC, and LG. To identify the sources of emissions, it is usual practice to use the ratio of the measured EC, OC, TC (Total Carbon), and LG. The PREPAIR emission estimates and these new calculations are then used to train the Random Forest (RF) algorithm, considering a large array of local variables, such as taxes, the characteristics of urbanization and dwellings, the number of employees detailed for economic activities, occupation levels and land cover. The outcome of the comparison of the predictions of the machine learning implemented model (ML) with the estimates obtained for the same areas by two independent methods, local disaggregation of the national emission inventory and Copernicus Air Modelling Service (CAMS) emissions estimates, is extremely encouraging and confirms it also as a promising approach in terms of effort saving. The implemented modelling approach identifies the most important variables affecting the spatialization of different pollutants in agreement with the main emission source characteristics and is suitable for harmonization of the results of different local emission inventories with national emission reporting. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Characterization of the Po Basin study area, with emphasis on urbanized area, road networks, and topographical features.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Processes for local and national emission inventories in Italy (adapted from SNPA 2016 [<a href="#B38-air-02-00022" class="html-bibr">38</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Spatial distribution of total OC emissions (<b>a</b>), non-industrial combustion (<b>b</b>) and road transport (<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Spatial distribution of total BC emission (<b>a</b>), non-industrial combustion (<b>b</b>) and road transport (<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparison of Emissions in Italian Provinces. ML calculation (_RF), Top-down of the National Emission Inventory (_NIR) and CAMS Emissions (_CAMS).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Emission density maps for PM<sub>2.5</sub>, OC, BC and LG estimated for Italy by ML propagation of the Po Basin inventories (t/km<sup>2</sup>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6 Cont.
<p>Emission density maps for PM<sub>2.5</sub>, OC, BC and LG estimated for Italy by ML propagation of the Po Basin inventories (t/km<sup>2</sup>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>NASA Worldview (<b>left</b>) and PM<sub>10</sub> emission map calculated by ML (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">
28 pages, 1573 KiB  
Article
Soil Properties Classification in Sustainable Agriculture Using Genetic Algorithm-Optimized and Deep Neural Networks
by Yadviga Tynchenko, Vadim Tynchenko, Vladislav Kukartsev, Tatyana Panfilova, Oksana Kukartseva, Ksenia Degtyareva, Van Nguyen and Ivan Malashin
Sustainability 2024, 16(19), 8598; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198598 - 3 Oct 2024
Viewed by 492
Abstract
Optimization of land management and agricultural practices require precise classification of soil properties. This study presents a method to fine-tune deep neural network (DNN) hyperparameters for multiclass classification of soil properties using genetic algorithms (GAs) with knowledge-based generation of hyperparameters. The focus is [...] Read more.
Optimization of land management and agricultural practices require precise classification of soil properties. This study presents a method to fine-tune deep neural network (DNN) hyperparameters for multiclass classification of soil properties using genetic algorithms (GAs) with knowledge-based generation of hyperparameters. The focus is on classifying soil attributes, including nutrient availability (0.78 ± 0.11), nutrient retention capacity (0.86 ± 0.05), rooting conditions (0.85 ± 0.07), oxygen availability to roots (0.84 ± 0.05), excess salts (0.96 ± 0.02), toxicity (0.96 ± 0.01), and soil workability (0.84 ± 0.09), with these accuracies representing the results from classification with variations from cross-validation. A dataset from the USA, which includes land-use distribution, aspect distribution, slope distribution, and climate data for each plot, is utilized. A GA is applied to explore a wide range of hyperparameters, such as the number of layers, neurons per layer, activation functions, optimizers, learning rates, and loss functions. Additionally, ensemble methods such as random forest and gradient boosting machines were employed, demonstrating comparable accuracy to the DNN approach. This research contributes to the advancement of precision agriculture by providing a robust machine learning (ML) framework for accurate soil property classification. By enabling more informed and efficient land management decisions, it promotes sustainable agricultural practices that optimize resource use and enhance soil health for long-term ecological balance. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>USA area distribution across soil workability constraints.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Histograms of slopes distribution by constraining field management categories.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Histograms of land-use categories by constraining field management categories.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Variation in slope aspect distribution across soil workability constraints.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Variation in soil qualities’ distribution across soil workability constraints.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Diagram showing the features used for mapping soil management and classifying soil properties.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Experimental pipeline of the proposed approach.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Evolution of model accuracy scores across individuals on the test set.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Variation of confusion matrices across best DNN architectures.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>t-SNE visualization of the soil workability dataset with ’SQ7’ classification.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Solutions and applications in soil properties classification.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 1874 KiB  
Article
An AI-Based Approach for Developing a Recommendation System for Underground Mining Methods Pre-Selection
by Elsa Pansilvania Andre Manjate, Natsuo Okada, Yoko Ohtomo, Tsuyoshi Adachi, Bernardo Miguel Bene, Takahiko Arima and Youhei Kawamura
Mining 2024, 4(4), 747-765; https://doi.org/10.3390/mining4040042 - 2 Oct 2024
Viewed by 458
Abstract
Selecting the most appropriate mining method to recover mineral resources is a critical decision-making task in mining project development. This study introduces an artificial intelligence-based mining methods recommendation system (AI-MMRS) for the pre-selection of underground mining methods. The study integrates and evaluates the [...] Read more.
Selecting the most appropriate mining method to recover mineral resources is a critical decision-making task in mining project development. This study introduces an artificial intelligence-based mining methods recommendation system (AI-MMRS) for the pre-selection of underground mining methods. The study integrates and evaluates the capability of two approaches for mining methods selection (MMS): the memory-based collaborative filtering (CF) approach aided by the UBC-MMS system to predict the top-3 relevant mining methods and supervised machine learning (ML) classification algorithms to enhance the effectiveness and novelty of the AI-MMRS, addressing the limitations of the CF approach. The results reveal that the memory-based CF approach achieves an accuracy ranging from 81.8% to 87.9%. Among the classification algorithms, artificial neural network (ANN) and k-nearest neighbors (KNN) classifiers perform the best, with accuracy levels of 66.7% and 63.6%, respectively. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness and viability of both approaches in MMS, acknowledging their limitations and the need for continuous training and optimization. The proposed AI-MMRS for the pre-selection stage supplemented by the direct involvement of mining professionals in later stages of MMS, has the potential to significantly aid in the MMS decision-making, providing data-driven and experience-based recommendations following the ongoing evolution of mining practices. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Mining Innovation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Methodology for developing the AI-MMRS (DMS: document management software: LogicalDOC Business version 8.7.3; ML: machine learning, CF: collaborative filtering, NMF: nonnegative matrix factorization) [<a href="#B10-mining-04-00042" class="html-bibr">10</a>,<a href="#B11-mining-04-00042" class="html-bibr">11</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Collaborative filtering recommendation system framework based on the user–item interaction dataset <span class="html-italic">X</span> composed of u-users and i-items with ratings ranging from 1 to 5, “?” unknown or missing rating.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Showing the data pre-processing: transformation of the input dataset for experiments to evaluate the proposed memory-based collaborative filtering approach.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Workflow of the proposed methodology for practical experiments: the memory-based collaborative filtering approach for predicting and recommending top-N mining methods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Performance of the proposed model in predicting primary and top-3 most relevant mining methods in terms of GAR and F1-score.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Confusion matrix of the artificial neural network (ANN) model showing the per-class Recall or True Positive Rate (TPR) and the True Negative Rate (TNR).</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 950 KiB  
Article
Combining Computational Fluid Dynamics, Structural Analysis, and Machine Learning to Predict Cerebrovascular Events: A Mild ML Approach
by Panagiotis K. Siogkas, Dimitrios Pleouras, Vasileios Pezoulas, Vassiliki Kigka, Vassilis Tsakanikas, Evangelos Fotiou, Vassiliki Potsika, George Charalampopoulos, George Galyfos, Fragkiska Sigala, Igor Koncar and Dimitrios I. Fotiadis
Diagnostics 2024, 14(19), 2204; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14192204 - 2 Oct 2024
Viewed by 297
Abstract
In order to predict cerebrovascular event occurrences, this work introduces a novel method that combines computational fluid dynamics (CFD), structural analysis, and machine learning (ML). The study presents a multidisciplinary approach to evaluate the risk of carotid atherosclerosis and cerebrovascular event prediction by [...] Read more.
In order to predict cerebrovascular event occurrences, this work introduces a novel method that combines computational fluid dynamics (CFD), structural analysis, and machine learning (ML). The study presents a multidisciplinary approach to evaluate the risk of carotid atherosclerosis and cerebrovascular event prediction by utilizing both imaging and non-imaging data. The study uses blood-flow simulations and 3D reconstruction techniques to identify important properties of plaque that may indicate cerebrovascular events. The analysis shows high accuracy of the model in predicting these events and is validated on a dataset of 134 asymptomatic individuals with carotid artery disease. The goal of this work is to improve clinical decision-making by providing a tool that blends machine learning algorithms, structural analysis, and CFD. The dataset imbalance was treated with two approaches in order to select the optimal one for the training of the Gradient Boosting Tree (GBT) classifier. The best GBT model yielded a balanced accuracy of 88%, having a ROC AUC of 0.92, a sensitivity of 0.88, and a specificity of 0.91. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vascular Imaging: Advances, Applications, and Future Perspectives)
40 pages, 2584 KiB  
Review
Bias in Machine Learning: A Literature Review
by Konstantinos Mavrogiorgos, Athanasios Kiourtis, Argyro Mavrogiorgou, Andreas Menychtas and Dimosthenis Kyriazis
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(19), 8860; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14198860 - 2 Oct 2024
Viewed by 496
Abstract
Bias could be defined as the tendency to be in favor or against a person or a group, thus promoting unfairness. In computer science, bias is called algorithmic or artificial intelligence (i.e., AI) and can be described as the tendency to showcase recurrent [...] Read more.
Bias could be defined as the tendency to be in favor or against a person or a group, thus promoting unfairness. In computer science, bias is called algorithmic or artificial intelligence (i.e., AI) and can be described as the tendency to showcase recurrent errors in a computer system, which result in “unfair” outcomes. Bias in the “outside world” and algorithmic bias are interconnected since many types of algorithmic bias originate from external factors. The enormous variety of different types of AI biases that have been identified in diverse domains highlights the need for classifying the said types of AI bias and providing a detailed overview of ways to identify and mitigate them. The different types of algorithmic bias that exist could be divided into categories based on the origin of the bias, since bias can occur during the different stages of the Machine Learning (i.e., ML) lifecycle. This manuscript is a literature study that provides a detailed survey regarding the different categories of bias and the corresponding approaches that have been proposed to identify and mitigate them. This study not only provides ready-to-use algorithms for identifying and mitigating bias, but also enhances the empirical knowledge of ML engineers to identify bias based on the similarity that their use cases have to other approaches that are presented in this manuscript. Based on the findings of this study, it is observed that some types of AI bias are better covered in the literature, both in terms of identification and mitigation, whilst others need to be studied more. The overall contribution of this research work is to provide a useful guideline for the identification and mitigation of bias that can be utilized by ML engineers and everyone who is interested in developing, evaluating and/or utilizing ML models. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances and Applications of Complex Data Analysis and Computing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Types of bias per ML lifecycle category.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Selection process of relative studies.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Relatively common domains and solutions with regard to data bias.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>A summarization of the most common estimators, optimizers and regularization techniques.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>How can engineers introduce bias in the ML lifecycle?</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Action plan for reducing bias during the evaluation of ML models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Number of research studies per bias type.</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 7709 KiB  
Article
A Machine Learning Approach for Mechanical Component Design Based on Topology Optimization Considering the Restrictions of Additive Manufacturing
by Abid Ullah, Karim Asami, Lukas Holtz, Tim Röver, Kashif Azher, Katharina Bartsch and Claus Emmelmann
J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2024, 8(5), 220; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp8050220 - 1 Oct 2024
Viewed by 583
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) and topology optimization (TO) emerge as vital processes in modern industries, with broad adoption driven by reduced expenses and the desire for lightweight and complex designs. However, iterative topology optimization can be inefficient and time-consuming for individual products with a [...] Read more.
Additive manufacturing (AM) and topology optimization (TO) emerge as vital processes in modern industries, with broad adoption driven by reduced expenses and the desire for lightweight and complex designs. However, iterative topology optimization can be inefficient and time-consuming for individual products with a large set of parameters. To address this shortcoming, machine learning (ML), primarily neural networks, is considered a viable tool to enhance topology optimization and streamline AM processes. In this work, a machine learning (ML) model that generates a parameterized optimized topology is presented, capable of eliminating the conventional iterative steps of TO, which shortens the development cycle and decreases overall development costs. The ML algorithm used, a conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN) known as Pix2Pix-GAN, is adopted to train using a variety of training data pairs consisting of color-coded images and is applied to an example of cantilever optimization, significantly enhancing model accuracy and operational efficiency. The analysis of training data numbers in relation to the model’s accuracy shows that as data volume increases, the accuracy of the model improves. Various ML models are developed and validated in this study; however, some artefacts are still present in the generated designs. Structures that are free from these artefacts achieve 91% reliability successfully. On the other hand, the images generated with artefacts may still serve as suitable design templates with minimal adjustments. Furthermore, this research also assesses compliance with two manufacturing constraints: the limitations on build space and passive elements (voids). Incorporating manufacturing constraints into model design ensures that the generated designs are not only optimized for performance but also feasible for production. By adhering to these constraints, the models can deliver superior performance in future use while maintaining practicality in real-world applications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Design, Processes and Materials for Additive Manufacturing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Illustration of the entire flowchart for this study with all the sub-steps involved.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Illustration of variable parameters and ToPy topology optimization workflow.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Graphical representation of steps for parametric model creation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Epochs 10–80 compared to topology optimization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparison between 100 and 500 epochs for Step 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparison between 10 and 100 epochs for Step 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparison between 10 and 100 epochs for Step 4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Comparison of the epochs of the first two models in Step 1 and Step 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparison across the epochs of the models in the third and fourth steps.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9 Cont.
<p>Comparison across the epochs of the models in the third and fourth steps.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Mean values compared across models with training data pairs 2000–5000.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The effects of training data growth on accuracy for Step 7 (epoch values of 10 and 50).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Correlation between the number of data pairs and deviation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Differences between models with different numbers of training data pairs for Step 7 (70–4800).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Generation of images from input data for which the model was not trained (deviating shapes).</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Validation problem based on pixel-to-pixel image data comparison.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Mean, minimum, maximum, and standard deviation of Model 2 and Model 2+3+4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Model 2 and Model 2+3+4 in relation to the test data pair of Step 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Approach with a ML model for iteration substitution compared to a classical approach.</p>
Full article ">
44 pages, 17947 KiB  
Review
The Intersection of Machine Learning and Wireless Sensor Network Security for Cyber-Attack Detection: A Detailed Analysis
by Tahesin Samira Delwar, Unal Aras, Sayak Mukhopadhyay, Akshay Kumar, Ujwala Kshirsagar, Yangwon Lee, Mangal Singh and Jee-Youl Ryu
Sensors 2024, 24(19), 6377; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24196377 - 1 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1117
Abstract
This study provides a thorough examination of the important intersection of Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) with machine learning (ML) for improving security. WSNs play critical roles in a wide range of applications, but their inherent constraints create unique security challenges. To address these [...] Read more.
This study provides a thorough examination of the important intersection of Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) with machine learning (ML) for improving security. WSNs play critical roles in a wide range of applications, but their inherent constraints create unique security challenges. To address these problems, numerous ML algorithms have been used to improve WSN security, with a special emphasis on their advantages and disadvantages. Notable difficulties include localisation, coverage, anomaly detection, congestion control, and Quality of Service (QoS), emphasising the need for innovation. This study provides insights into the beneficial potential of ML in bolstering WSN security through a comprehensive review of existing experiments. This study emphasises the need to use ML’s potential while expertly resolving subtle nuances to preserve the integrity and dependability of WSNs in the increasingly interconnected environment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Applications of WSNs and the IoT—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Taxonomy of the review.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Basic configuration of a WSN architecture.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Complex WSN flow.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Illustration of different wireless communication standards for WSNs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Topologies of Communication Protocols in WSNs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Overview of various deployment types in WSNs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Applications of WSNs across different sectors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Overview of common supervised learning algorithms in WSNs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Illustration of localisation techniques in WSNs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Common anomaly detection methods for WSN security: (<b>a</b>) normal flow, (<b>b</b>) black hole attack, (<b>c</b>) misdirection attack, (<b>d</b>) wormhole attack, (<b>e</b>) sinkhole attack.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Comparison of error detection techniques in WSNs [<a href="#B63-sensors-24-06377" class="html-bibr">63</a>,<a href="#B64-sensors-24-06377" class="html-bibr">64</a>,<a href="#B65-sensors-24-06377" class="html-bibr">65</a>,<a href="#B93-sensors-24-06377" class="html-bibr">93</a>,<a href="#B94-sensors-24-06377" class="html-bibr">94</a>,<a href="#B95-sensors-24-06377" class="html-bibr">95</a>,<a href="#B96-sensors-24-06377" class="html-bibr">96</a>,<a href="#B97-sensors-24-06377" class="html-bibr">97</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Performance comparison of machine learning models for authentication in WSNs [<a href="#B69-sensors-24-06377" class="html-bibr">69</a>,<a href="#B70-sensors-24-06377" class="html-bibr">70</a>,<a href="#B71-sensors-24-06377" class="html-bibr">71</a>,<a href="#B107-sensors-24-06377" class="html-bibr">107</a>,<a href="#B108-sensors-24-06377" class="html-bibr">108</a>,<a href="#B109-sensors-24-06377" class="html-bibr">109</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Illustration of congestion scenarios in WSNs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Diversified security performance comparison [<a href="#B73-sensors-24-06377" class="html-bibr">73</a>,<a href="#B112-sensors-24-06377" class="html-bibr">112</a>,<a href="#B114-sensors-24-06377" class="html-bibr">114</a>,<a href="#B115-sensors-24-06377" class="html-bibr">115</a>,<a href="#B116-sensors-24-06377" class="html-bibr">116</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Centralised design for securing WSNs using Blockchain.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Cluster-based design for WSN security using Blockchain.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Important features of Blockchain–machine-learning integration for securing WSNs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Architecture of Blockchain and machine learning integration in WSNs.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 1242 KiB  
Article
Text Analytics on YouTube Comments for Food Products
by Maria Tsiourlini, Katerina Tzafilkou, Dimitrios Karapiperis and Christos Tjortjis
Information 2024, 15(10), 599; https://doi.org/10.3390/info15100599 - 30 Sep 2024
Viewed by 240
Abstract
YouTube is a popular social media platform in the contemporary digital landscape. The primary focus of this study is to explore the underlying sentiment in user comments about food-related videos on YouTube, specifically within two pivotal food categories: plant-based and hedonic product. We [...] Read more.
YouTube is a popular social media platform in the contemporary digital landscape. The primary focus of this study is to explore the underlying sentiment in user comments about food-related videos on YouTube, specifically within two pivotal food categories: plant-based and hedonic product. We labeled comments using sentiment lexicons such as TextBlob, VADER, and Google’s Sentiment Analysis (GSA) engine. Comment sentiment was classified using advanced Machine-Learning (ML) algorithms, namely Support Vector Machines (SVM), Multinomial Naive Bayes, Random Forest, Logistic Regression, and XGBoost. The evaluation of these models encompassed key macro average metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. The results from GSA showed a high accuracy level, with SVM achieving 93% accuracy in the plant-based dataset and 96% in the hedonic dataset. In addition to sentiment analysis, we delved into user interactions within the two datasets, measuring crucial metrics, such as views, likes, comments, and engagement rate. The findings illuminate significantly higher levels of views, likes, and comments in the hedonic food dataset, but the plant-based dataset maintains a superior overall engagement rate. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 2nd Edition of Information Retrieval and Social Media Mining)
16 pages, 3635 KiB  
Article
Information FOMO: The Unhealthy Fear of Missing Out on Information—A Method for Removing Misleading Data for Healthier Models
by Ethan Pickering and Themistoklis P. Sapsis
Entropy 2024, 26(10), 835; https://doi.org/10.3390/e26100835 - 30 Sep 2024
Viewed by 289
Abstract
Misleading or unnecessary data can have out-sized impacts on the health or accuracy of Machine Learning (ML) models. We present a Bayesian sequential selection method, akin to Bayesian experimental design, that identifies critically important information within a dataset while ignoring data that are [...] Read more.
Misleading or unnecessary data can have out-sized impacts on the health or accuracy of Machine Learning (ML) models. We present a Bayesian sequential selection method, akin to Bayesian experimental design, that identifies critically important information within a dataset while ignoring data that are either misleading or bring unnecessary complexity to the surrogate model of choice. Our method improves sample-wise error convergence and eliminates instances where more data lead to worse performance and instabilities of the surrogate model, often termed sample-wise “double descent”. We find these instabilities are a result of the complexity of the underlying map and are linked to extreme events and heavy tails. Our approach has two key features. First, the selection algorithm dynamically couples the chosen model and data. Data is chosen based on its merits towards improving the selected model, rather than being compared strictly against other data. Second, a natural convergence of the method removes the need for dividing the data into training, testing, and validation sets. Instead, the selection metric inherently assesses testing and validation error through global statistics of the model. This ensures that key information is never wasted in testing or validation. The method is applied using both Gaussian process regression and deep neural network surrogate models. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue An Information-Theoretical Perspective on Complex Dynamical Systems)
33 pages, 7989 KiB  
Article
Emergency Vehicle Classification Using Combined Temporal and Spectral Audio Features with Machine Learning Algorithms
by Dontabhaktuni Jayakumar, Modugu Krishnaiah, Sreedhar Kollem, Samineni Peddakrishna, Nadikatla Chandrasekhar and Maturi Thirupathi
Electronics 2024, 13(19), 3873; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13193873 - 30 Sep 2024
Viewed by 433
Abstract
This study presents a novel approach to emergency vehicle classification that leverages a comprehensive set of informative audio features to distinguish between ambulance sirens, fire truck sirens, and traffic noise. A unique contribution lies in combining time domain features, including root mean square [...] Read more.
This study presents a novel approach to emergency vehicle classification that leverages a comprehensive set of informative audio features to distinguish between ambulance sirens, fire truck sirens, and traffic noise. A unique contribution lies in combining time domain features, including root mean square (RMS) and zero-crossing rate, to capture the temporal characteristics, like signal energy changes, with frequency domain features derived from short-time Fourier transform (STFT). These include spectral centroid, spectral bandwidth, and spectral roll-off, providing insights into the sound’s frequency content for differentiating siren patterns from traffic noise. Additionally, Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs) are incorporated to capture the human-like auditory perception of the spectral information. This combination captures both temporal and spectral characteristics of the audio signals, enhancing the model’s ability to discriminate between emergency vehicles and traffic noise compared to using features from a single domain. A significant contribution of this study is the integration of data augmentation techniques that replicate real-world conditions, including the Doppler effect and noise environment considerations. This study further investigates the effectiveness of different machine learning algorithms applied to the extracted features, performing a comparative analysis to determine the most effective classifier for this task. This analysis reveals that the support vector machine (SVM) achieves the highest accuracy of 99.5%, followed by random forest (RF) and k-nearest neighbors (KNNs) at 98.5%, while AdaBoost lags at 96.0% and long short-term memory (LSTM) has an accuracy of 93%. We also demonstrate the effectiveness of a stacked ensemble classifier, and utilizing these base learners achieves an accuracy of 99.5%. Furthermore, this study conducted leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) to validate the results, with SVM and RF achieving accuracies of 98.5%, followed by KNN and AdaBoost, which are 97.0% and 90.5%. These findings indicate the superior performance of advanced ML techniques in emergency vehicle classification. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in AI Engineering: Exploring Machine Learning Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Audio signal feature extraction and classification workflow.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Detailed procedure for pre-processing and augmentation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Categorization of feature extraction methods in the time domain and frequency domain.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>RMS of an input sound waveform.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>ZCR wave for the input waveform.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>RMS and ZCR extraction procedure from the pre-processed dataset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Spectral centroid of an audio signal.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The SBW representation of an audio signal.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Waveform of spectral roll-off for an input siren wave.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Chroma feature extraction of the wave.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>MFCC feature extraction of the wave.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Min and Max frequency representation of the audio sample.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Frequency domain feature extraction process for audio signals.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>The IF, chirp, and spectral flux representation of the audio signal over time.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Stacked ensemble classifier models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Confusion matrix insights for sound classification models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Comparison performance for basic models with LOOCV.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Classification report of the models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Training and validation accuracies of the models.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop