Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 

Soil Mechanical Systems and Related Farming Machinery

A special issue of Agriculture (ISSN 2077-0472). This special issue belongs to the section "Agricultural Technology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 October 2023) | Viewed by 34227

Printed Edition Available!
A printed edition of this Special Issue is available here.

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Biosystems Engineering, Kangwon National University, 1 Kangwondaehak-gil, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of Korea
Interests: agricultural engineering; agricultural ergonomics; agricultural field machinery; digital agriculture; soil–machine systems; terramechanics
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Bioindustrial Machinery Engineering, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Republic of Korea
Interests: agriculture machinery; precision agriculture; soil and crop sensing; remote monitoring system; VIS–NIR spectroscopy; online soil measurement
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The mechanization of agricultural works has greatly contributed to the improvement of agricultural productivity and the reduction in production costs. Since the beginning of mechanization, various kinds of agricultural machinery related to soil preparation, sowing, harvesting, post-harvesting, etc. have been developed. In addition, customized agricultural machines that are suitable for cultivation type and soil characteristics of each country and region have been developed. Agricultural machinery, unlike other industrial machinery, targets living organisms and operates on the soil, so it should be designed in consideration of the interaction with the soil. It is possible to optimally design agricultural machinery by understanding both the characteristics of the soil and the characteristics of the mechanical system.

This Special Issue focuses on research regarding soil–machine systems in agriculture, including design, analysis, experimentation, etc. In addition to soil-related research, agricultural machinery and automation-related research is also of interest. This also includes off-road environments as well as greenhouse or smart farm applications. Both original research articles and comprehensive reviews are welcome.

Dr. Ju-Seok Nam
Dr. Yongjin Cho
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Agriculture is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • agricultural engineering
  • agricultural machinery
  • biosystems engineering
  • off-road farming
  • smart farming
  • soil–machine systems
  • precision agriculture
  • soil and crop

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (15 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research, Other

5 pages, 147 KiB  
Editorial
Soil Mechanical Systems and Related Farming Machinery
by Yongjin Cho and Ju-Seok Nam
Agriculture 2024, 14(9), 1661; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14091661 - 23 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1262
Abstract
The mechanization of agricultural work has contributed significantly to the improvement of agricultural productivity and reduced production costs [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soil Mechanical Systems and Related Farming Machinery)

Research

Jump to: Editorial, Other

11 pages, 5119 KiB  
Article
Development of a Modified Method for Measuring the Actual Draft Force Using a Tractor-Attached Dynamometer
by Hyo-Geol Kim, Jin-Woong Lee, Su-Chul Kim, Jooseon Oh and Sung-Bo Shim
Agriculture 2024, 14(4), 544; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14040544 - 29 Mar 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1205
Abstract
In this study, crank-locker kinematic equations were used to analyze the three-point hitch behavior when the dynamometer was connected to the work machine. The dynamometer was statically tested with a hydraulic actuator, and the accuracy of the three-way force and the moment was [...] Read more.
In this study, crank-locker kinematic equations were used to analyze the three-point hitch behavior when the dynamometer was connected to the work machine. The dynamometer was statically tested with a hydraulic actuator, and the accuracy of the three-way force and the moment was confirmed to be 96–99%. The calibrated dynamometer was put to the test on a real farm field, and data were collected using a data acquisition system. Using the transport pitch correction equation, the collected data can be transformed into more realistic data. International standards were used to determine the point of connection between the tractor, dynamometer, and implement. The results of this study made it possible to accurately measure force and moment, which will have an important role in future agricultural technologies such as autonomous agricultural operation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soil Mechanical Systems and Related Farming Machinery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Element of three-point hitch.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Component force direction of load cells.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Dynamometer and instrumentation components.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Moment direction of load cells.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The force–moment direction of the dynamometer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>New coordinate system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Traction data before and after revision.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Vertical force data before and after revision.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 4066 KiB  
Article
The Development of a Draft Force Prediction Model for Agricultural Tractors Based on the Discrete Element Method in Loam and Clay Loam
by Bo-Min Bae, Yeon-Soo Kim, Wan-Soo Kim, Yong-Joo Kim, Sang-Dae Lee and Taek-Jin Kim
Agriculture 2023, 13(12), 2205; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13122205 - 27 Nov 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2098
Abstract
In the field of agricultural machinery, various empirical field tests are conducted to measure design loads for the optimal design and implementation of tractors. However, conducting field tests is costly and time-consuming, with many constraints on weather and field soil conditions, and research [...] Read more.
In the field of agricultural machinery, various empirical field tests are conducted to measure design loads for the optimal design and implementation of tractors. However, conducting field tests is costly and time-consuming, with many constraints on weather and field soil conditions, and research utilizing simulations has been proposed as an alternative to overcome these shortcomings. The objective of this study is to develop a DEM-based draft force prediction model that reflects differences in soil properties. For this, soil property measurements were conducted in two fields (Field A in Daejeon, Republic of Korea, and Field B in Chuncheon, Republic of Korea). The measured properties were used as parameters for DEM-based particle modeling. For the interparticle contact model, the EEPA contact model was used to reflect the compressibility and stickiness of cohesive soils. To generate an environment similar to real soil, particle mass and surface energy were calibrated based on bulk density and shear torque. The soil property measurements showed that Field B had a higher shear strength and lower cone index and moisture content compared to Field A. The actual measured draft force was 19.47% higher in Field B than in Field A. In this study, this demonstrates the uncertainty in predicting draft force by correlating only one soil property and suggests the need for a comprehensive consideration of soil properties. The simulation results of the tillage operation demonstrated the accuracy of the predicted shedding force compared to the actual field experiment and the existing theoretical calculation method (ASABE D497.4). Compared to the measured draft force in the actual field test, the predictions were 86.75% accurate in Field A and 74.51% accurate in Field B, which is 84% more accurate in Field A and 37.32% more accurate in Field B than the theoretical calculation method. This result shows that load prediction should reflect the soil properties of the working environment, and is expected to be used as an indicator of soil–tool interaction for digital twin modeling processes in the research field of bio-industrial machinery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soil Mechanical Systems and Related Farming Machinery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of test fields and uniformed grid sampling methods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Modeling Procedures for Virtual Soil Environments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Configuration of field load measurement system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Results of cone penetration test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Calibration of shear torque using vane shear test: (<b>a</b>) field experiments and (<b>b</b>) EDEM simulation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Virtual large soil bed made based on measured soil properties by soil layer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparison of draft force between actual field test and DEM simulation at 16.5 cm tillage depth. (<b>a</b>) Field A and (<b>b</b>) Field B.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Comparison of draft force between Field A and Field B.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 3663 KiB  
Article
The Influence of Soil Physical Properties on the Load Factor for Agricultural Tractors in Different Paddy Fields
by Yi-Seo Min, Yeon-Soo Kim, Ryu-Gap Lim, Taek-Jin Kim, Yong-Joo Kim and Wan-Soo Kim
Agriculture 2023, 13(11), 2073; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13112073 - 29 Oct 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1656
Abstract
The load factor (LF) of a tractor represents the ratio of actual engine power and rated engine power, and is an important indicator directly used in calculating national air pollutant emissions. Currently, in the Republic of Korea, a fixed value of 0.48 is [...] Read more.
The load factor (LF) of a tractor represents the ratio of actual engine power and rated engine power, and is an important indicator directly used in calculating national air pollutant emissions. Currently, in the Republic of Korea, a fixed value of 0.48 is used for the LF regardless of the working conditions, making it difficult to establish a reliable national air pollutant inventory. Since tractors perform work under soil conditions, soil physical properties directly affect the tractor LF. Therefore, it is expected that more accurate LF estimation will be possible by utilizing soil physical properties. This study was conducted to assess the impact of soil physical properties on the LF. Experimental data were collected in ten different soil conditions. Correlation analysis revealed that the LF exhibited strong correlations with SMC, soil texture, and CI, in that order. The coefficient of determination for the regression model developed using soil variables ranged from 0.678 to 0.926. The developed regression models generally showed higher accuracy when utilizing multiple soil variables, as compared to using a single soil variable. Therefore, an effective estimation of the LF through non-experimental methods can be achieved by measuring various soil properties. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soil Mechanical Systems and Related Farming Machinery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The engine performance curve of the tractor used in this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Geospatial information of each experimental site.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Results of box plot analysis of soil physical properties measured on field experiment sites (e.g., S1 refers to site 1): (<b>a</b>) cone index (CI) and (<b>b</b>) soil moisture content (SMC).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Results of sand, silt, and clay proportion analysis of soil particles by field experiment sites, where S# refers to the number of sites (i.e., S1 = Site 1).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Classification results of the sampled soil by ten field experiment study sites mapped to the USDA soil texture triangle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Results of box plot analysis of engine load measured on field experiment sites (e.g., S1 refers to site 1): (<b>a</b>) engine torque (ET), (<b>b</b>) engine rotation speed, (<b>c</b>) engine power (EP), and (<b>d</b>) load factor (LF).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Load factor analysis results for each site on the engine performance curve.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Results of correlation analysis of soil physical properties and engine load characteristics.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 4085 KiB  
Article
Fertilization Mapping Based on the Soil Properties of Paddy Fields in Korea
by Juwon Shin, Jinho Won, Seong-Min Kim, Dae-Cheol Kim and Yongjin Cho
Agriculture 2023, 13(11), 2049; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13112049 - 26 Oct 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1807
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to construct a map of expected fertilization rates for nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P2O5) based on measurements of components in soil samples and to identify the spatial variabilities of four lots of a [...] Read more.
The purpose of this study was to construct a map of expected fertilization rates for nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P2O5) based on measurements of components in soil samples and to identify the spatial variabilities of four lots of a salt-affected paddy field in Korea. Four salt-affected paddy field lots in Korea were divided into 30 sectors for collecting soil samples. They were then analyzed for soil organic matter (SOM), silicon dioxide (SiO2), total nitrogen (TN), and available phosphorus (Av.P2O5) in accordance with international standards. Expected fertilization rates of N and P2O5 were developed as prescription standards for the application of fertilizer to paddy fields. They were derived using a model of the fertilization rates of N and P2O5. To determine the presence of spatial correlation and continuity in the given fields, a spherical variogram was used. Based on the spherical model with the application of a regular kriging interpolation, maps of the contents of TN and Av.P2O5 as well as the expected fertilization rates of N and P2O5 at each sector of 1×1 m2 were developed. The expected fertilization rate of N at each sector appeared in the range of min. 10.0 g to max. 25.7 g, while that of P2O5 appeared in the range of min. 0.68 g to max. 8.46 g. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soil Mechanical Systems and Related Farming Machinery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of soil sampling point in Hwaseong–si, Gyeonggi–do, Republic of Korea. All fields were divided into 30 sections. Each number was a soil sampling number.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Sill, range, and nugget on variogram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Expected N fertilization rate by section. All fields were divided into 30 sections. Each section size of field 1 to 4 was 11 × 9, 13 × 8, 13 × 9, and 13 × 9 m<sup>2</sup>, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Expected P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> fertilization rate by section. All fields were divided into 30 sections. Each section size of field 1 to 4 was 11 × 9, 13 × 8, 13 × 9, and 13 × 9 m<sup>2</sup>, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Variogram of N and P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> using spherical model. The blue and gray lines mean the spherical model and measured data, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Mapping of TN content in soil and estimated N fertilization rate. Each square color represents the appropriate N fertilization rate for a 1 m<sup>2</sup> divided field.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Mapping of Av.P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> content in soil and estimated P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> fertilization rate. Each square color represents the appropriate P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> fertilization rate for a 1 m<sup>2</sup> divided field.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 6639 KiB  
Article
Performance Evaluation of a Virtual Test Model of the Frame-Type ROPS for Agricultural Tractors Using FEA
by Ryu-Gap Lim, Wan-Soo Kim, Young-Woo Do, Md. Abu Ayub Siddique and Yong-Joo Kim
Agriculture 2023, 13(10), 2004; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13102004 - 15 Oct 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1748
Abstract
In this study, a model of the frame-type ROPS (rollover protective structure) for an agricultural tractor was developed using FEA (finite-element analysis). Various boundary conditions were applied as input variables to replace the actual test of the ROPS with a virtual test. An [...] Read more.
In this study, a model of the frame-type ROPS (rollover protective structure) for an agricultural tractor was developed using FEA (finite-element analysis). Various boundary conditions were applied as input variables to replace the actual test of the ROPS with a virtual test. An optimization study was carried out based on the boundary conditions of the bolt, considering the ROPS part directly mounted on the tractor and the folding connection to the ROPS. The results of the virtual test were compared with those of the actual test, and the error was determined. The maximum error of the evaluation model was 7.0% for the force applied on the load and 9.6% for the corresponding ROPS deformation. All mounting bolts of the ROPS required modeling. In particular, we had to establish free boundary conditions for axial rotation to implement the folding connection. In addition, a simulation of the frame-type ROPS was conducted according to the mesh size. A convenient simulation time was obtained for a mesh size of 8~10 mm. Compared with the actual test, the accuracy was the highest with a mesh size of 6~8 mm. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soil Mechanical Systems and Related Farming Machinery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Procedure to develop the virtual test model for ROPS described in this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Collimation between the FE model and real model for frame-type ROPS: (<b>a</b>) drawing of frame-type ROPS; (<b>b</b>) frame of FE model; (<b>c</b>) folding part, plate, pin, and bolt of FE model. * Boundary conditions of contact area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>True stress–strain of material used in this study. (<b>a</b>) SS400; (<b>b</b>) SPSR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Loading conditions in the ROPS FE model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Load plate of the ROPS, for rear and front loading. (<b>a</b>) Actual plate; (<b>b</b>) 2D load plate size and node identification in the FE model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Load plate of the ROPS for side loading. (<b>a</b>) Actual; (<b>b</b>) 2D load plate size in the FE model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Boundary conditions of the mounting parts. (<b>a</b>) Constraints for bolt hole; (<b>b</b>) bolt modeling; (<b>c</b>) constraints for modeled bolts.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Model of the 3D shell and 2D plate of the folding portion of a tractor ROPS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Mesh size of the ROPS in the FE model. Chosen mesh sizes: (<b>a</b>) 4 mm; (<b>b</b>) 6 mm; (<b>c</b>) 8 mm; (<b>d</b>) 10 mm; (<b>e</b>) 15 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Force–deformation curve; results of FEA 1. (<b>a</b>) Rear loading, (<b>b</b>) side loading, and (<b>c</b>) front loading.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Evaluation of the distribution stress and deformation on ROPS according to the loading direction. (<b>a</b>) Rear loading; (<b>b</b>) side loading; and (<b>c</b>) front loading.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Force–deformation curve; FEA 2 results. (<b>a</b>) Rear loading, (<b>b</b>) side loading, and (<b>c</b>) front loading.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Comparison of the force–deformation curves obtained with the ROPS FE model and the actual test according to the mesh size.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 7944 KiB  
Article
High-Throughput Plant Phenotyping System Using a Low-Cost Camera Network for Plant Factory
by Woo-Jae Cho and Myongkyoon Yang
Agriculture 2023, 13(10), 1874; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13101874 - 25 Sep 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2526
Abstract
Plant phenotyping has been widely studied as an effective and powerful tool for analyzing crop status and growth. However, the traditional phenotyping (i.e., manual) is time-consuming and laborious, and the various types of growing structures and limited room for systems hinder phenotyping on [...] Read more.
Plant phenotyping has been widely studied as an effective and powerful tool for analyzing crop status and growth. However, the traditional phenotyping (i.e., manual) is time-consuming and laborious, and the various types of growing structures and limited room for systems hinder phenotyping on a large and high-throughput scale. In this study, a low-cost high-throughput phenotyping system that can be flexibly applied to diverse structures of growing beds with reliable spatial–temporal continuities was developed. The phenotyping system was composed of a low-cost phenotype sensor network with an integrated Raspberry Pi board and camera module. With the distributed camera sensors, the system can provide crop imagery information over the entire growing bed in real time. Furthermore, the modularized image-processing architecture supports the investigation of several phenotypic indices. The feasibility of the system was evaluated for Batavia lettuce grown under different light periods in a container-type plant factory. For the growing lettuces under different light periods, crop characteristics such as fresh weight, leaf length, leaf width, and leaf number were manually measured and compared with the phenotypic indices from the system. From the results, the system showed varying phenotypic features of lettuce for the entire growing period. In addition, the varied growth curves according to the different positions and light conditions confirmed that the developed system has potential to achieve many plant phenotypic scenarios at low cost and with spatial versatility. As such, it serves as a valuable development tool for researchers and cultivators interested in phenotyping. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soil Mechanical Systems and Related Farming Machinery)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Crop-growth container system with controlled environment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Experimental layout of growing bed and camera network installation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Diagram of network structure of the system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Views of multi-camera network-based high-throughput phenotyping system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Overall flowchart for crop ROI extraction and phenotypic index.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Results of applying ExG conversion to crop images: (<b>A</b>) RGB and (<b>B</b>) ExG binary images.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Additional image processing to acquire images of the ROI: (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) noise removal through Lab color system, (<b>C</b>) binary image, and (<b>D</b>) mask image.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Changes in phenotypic indices according to crop growth: days (<b>A</b>) 1, (<b>B</b>) 3, (<b>C</b>) 5, (<b>D</b>) 7, (<b>E</b>) 9, (<b>F</b>) 11, and (<b>G</b>) 13.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Growth curves for Batavia lettuces in different light periods: (<b>A</b>) control group (con) and (<b>B</b>) pulse group (pul).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Analysis of phenotypic indices for Batavia lettuces in different light periods: (<b>A</b>) area, (<b>B</b>) contour length, (<b>C</b>) minimum radius, and (<b>D</b>) maximum length. The colored area indicates the standard deviations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Predicting crop ground truth data through area index: (<b>A</b>) fresh weight, (<b>B</b>) leaf length, (<b>C</b>) leaf width, and (<b>D</b>) number of leaves.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 5556 KiB  
Article
Quantifying Soil Particle Settlement Characteristics through Machine Vision Analysis Utilizing an RGB Camera
by Donggeun Kim, Jisu Song and Jaesung Park
Agriculture 2023, 13(9), 1674; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13091674 - 24 Aug 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2332
Abstract
Soil particle size distribution is a crucial factor in determining soil properties and classifying soil types. Traditional methods, such as hydrometer tests, have limitations in terms of time required, labor, and operator dependency. In this paper, we propose a novel approach to quantify [...] Read more.
Soil particle size distribution is a crucial factor in determining soil properties and classifying soil types. Traditional methods, such as hydrometer tests, have limitations in terms of time required, labor, and operator dependency. In this paper, we propose a novel approach to quantify soil particle size analysis using machine vision analysis with an RGB camera. The method aims to overcome the limitations of traditional techniques by providing an efficient and automated analysis of fine-grained soils. It utilizes a digital camera to capture the settling properties of soil particles, eliminating the need for a hydrometer. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the machine vision-based approach in accurately determining soil particle size distribution. The comparison between the proposed method and traditional hydrometer tests reveals strong agreement, with an average deviation of only 2.3% in particle size measurements. This validates the reliability and accuracy of the machine vision-based approach. The proposed machine vision-based analysis offers a promising alternative to traditional techniques for assessing soil particle size distribution. The experimental results highlight its potential to revolutionize soil particle size analysis, providing precise, efficient, and cost-effective analysis for fine-grained soils. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soil Mechanical Systems and Related Farming Machinery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Particle size distribution curve of soil samples obtained using sieve analysis and a particle size analyzer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Settling tank for soil particle size analysis: (<b>a</b>) dimensions of settling tank; (<b>b</b>) experimental setup.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Region of interest in settling tank: (<b>a</b>) position of the region of interest; (<b>b</b>) cropped image of the region of interest.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Conceptual diagram of machine vision-based soil particle size analysis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Calculation process of machine vision-based soil particle size analysis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Changes in the hydrometer (<span class="html-italic">γ</span>) reading and color in soil–water suspension according to time.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Changes of average gray value in soil–water suspension according to time.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Relationship of settling distance (<span class="html-italic">L</span>) and time (<span class="html-italic">T</span>) for soil B.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Calculation result of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>I</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>D</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> for various diameter of soil particles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Relationship between average image intensity of particle size D and percent finer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Particle size distribution curve predicted by machine vision-based soil particle analysis method for soil samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Soil texture triangle predicted by machine vision-based soil particle analysis method for soil samples.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 5823 KiB  
Article
Working Load Analysis of a 42 kW Class Agricultural Tractor According to Tillage Type and Gear Selection during Rotary Tillage Operation
by Yeon-Soo Kim, Bo-Min Bae, Wan-Soo Kim, Yong-Joo Kim, Sang-Dae Lee and Taek-Jin Kim
Agriculture 2023, 13(8), 1556; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13081556 - 3 Aug 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2135
Abstract
The objective of this study was to analyze the effect of tillage type (i.e., primary and secondary tillage) and gear selection (P1L2 to P1L4) on the working load of tractor–implement systems during rotary tillage. Soil properties change with depth, and differences in properties [...] Read more.
The objective of this study was to analyze the effect of tillage type (i.e., primary and secondary tillage) and gear selection (P1L2 to P1L4) on the working load of tractor–implement systems during rotary tillage. Soil properties change with depth, and differences in properties along the depth distribution, such as the location of formation of the hardpan layer, internal friction angle, and moisture content, affect the load of rotary tillage operations. Therefore, the physical properties of soil along the field depth distribution were measured to analyze the effect of tillage type and gear selection on workload in rotary tillage. In addition, a load measurement system equipped with PTO torque meter, axle torque meter, proximity sensor, and RTK-GPS were configured on the 42 kW agricultural tractor. The experimental results show that the combination of tillage type and gear selection has a wide-ranging effect on the tractor’s workload and performance when the rotavator operated at the same tilling depth. Overall working load was higher by up to 14% (engine) and 29.1% (PTO shaft) in primary tillage compared to secondary tillage when the gear selection was the same. When the tillage type is the same, it was analyzed that the overall average torque increased by up to 35.9% (engine) and 33.9% (PTO shaft) in P1L4 compared to P1L2 according to gear selection. Based on load analysis results, it was found that the effect of gear selection (Engine: 4–14%, PTO: 12.1–28.6%) on engine and PTO loads was higher than that of tillage type (Engine: 31.6–35.1%, PTO: 31.9–32.8%), and the power requirement tended to decrease in secondary tillage. Therefore, working load should be considered according to the soil environment and tillage type when designing agricultural machinery system. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soil Mechanical Systems and Related Farming Machinery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Sampling procedure of field soil property using uniformed grid method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Tractor–implement system used in this study: (<b>a</b>) rotavator (WJ185A, Woongjin, Republic of Korea); (<b>b</b>) 42 kW class agricultural tractor (TX58, TYM, Gongju, Republic of Korea).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Configuration of the field load measurement system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Load measurement test during rotary tillage: (<b>a</b>) primary tillage; (<b>b</b>) secondary tillage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Analysis of cone penetration test results; and (<b>b</b>) target tillage depth.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Results of engine torque data according to tillage type and gear selection during rotary tillage: (<b>a</b>) primary tillage; (<b>b</b>) secondary tillage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Results of PTO shaft torque as a function of tillage type and gear selection during rotary tillage: (<b>a</b>) primary tillage; (<b>b</b>) secondary tillage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Results of front wheel axle torque data according to tillage type and gear selection during rotary tillage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Results of rear wheel axle torque data according to tillage type and gear selection during rotary tillage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Analysis of power requirement as a function of tillage type and gear selection.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 4922 KiB  
Article
Theoretical Calculations and Experimental Studies of Power Loss in Dual-Clutch Transmission of Agricultural Tractors
by Hyoung-Jong Ahn, Young-Jun Park, Su-Chul Kim and Chanho Choi
Agriculture 2023, 13(6), 1225; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13061225 - 10 Jun 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2402
Abstract
Recent carbon neutrality policies have led to active research in the agricultural tractor sector to replace internal combustion engines, making it imperative to minimize power losses to improve efficiency. Dual-clutch transmissions (DCTs) have been employed in agricultural tractors primarily due to their short [...] Read more.
Recent carbon neutrality policies have led to active research in the agricultural tractor sector to replace internal combustion engines, making it imperative to minimize power losses to improve efficiency. Dual-clutch transmissions (DCTs) have been employed in agricultural tractors primarily due to their short shift time and smooth shift feel. However, DCTs have a relatively large number of components and complex structures owing to spatial constraints, making it challenging to predict power losses. Therefore, to predict DCT power losses, this study defined oil churning by considering the structural characteristics and oil circulation and comparing and analyzing the theoretical calculation and test results of power losses at different oil levels. Power loss was calculated based on ISO standards and fluid viscosity theory, and tests were performed to verify. We calculated power losses based on the defined oil churning of a DCT in agricultural tractors and confirmed that their consistency in test results improved when reflecting the lubrication state, considering the structural features and oil circulation. In addition, the factors contributing to power loss under low- and high-speed conditions were analyzed by calculating the power loss for each component. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soil Mechanical Systems and Related Farming Machinery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Oil levels of a dual-clutch transmission (DCT) in full-power shift.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Power loss measurement system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Input load conditions for experimental studies.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Theoretical calculation results of the power losses.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Power transmission efficiencies obtained by theoretical calculation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Power loss measurement results of the DCT.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparison between calculations and measurements of the power loss.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7 Cont.
<p>Comparison between calculations and measurements of the power loss.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Power loss analysis results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8 Cont.
<p>Power loss analysis results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Rotation speed variation of each gear step.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 5615 KiB  
Article
Bucket Size Optimization for Metering Device in Garlic Planter Using Discrete Element Method
by Dongu Im, Ho-Seop Lee, Jae-Hyun Kim, Dong-Joo Moon, Tae-Ick Moon, Seung-Hwa Yu and Young-Jun Park
Agriculture 2023, 13(6), 1199; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13061199 - 5 Jun 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1730
Abstract
In this study, the discrete element method was used to optimize the bucket size for the metering device in a garlic planter for enhancing the productivity of garlic farming according to the garlic size. Statistical information concerning the actual shape of garlic cloves [...] Read more.
In this study, the discrete element method was used to optimize the bucket size for the metering device in a garlic planter for enhancing the productivity of garlic farming according to the garlic size. Statistical information concerning the actual shape of garlic cloves was incorporated, and the mechanical properties of garlic were determined using the bulk density, sliding test, and repose angle test for enhancing the fidelity of the simulation model. The optimal bucket size achieving the target plant rate of 97.5% was determined using the developed discrete element model for the three garlic size groups. The linear search method was used for optimization, and batch simulation was performed to validate the optimized results and confirm the performance index of the metering device. A Gaussian distribution based on statistical information accounted for the various garlic sizes in each group. Finally, a metering test verified the reliability of the optimization technique. The differences between the simulation and test results were within 10% for all performance indices, including missing plant rate, multi-plant rate, and planting rate, indicating the high reliability of the analysis model. Subsequently, the larger garlic groups (Groups 2 and 3) exhibited metering performance close to the target plant rate. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soil Mechanical Systems and Related Farming Machinery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Configuration of metering device.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Mechanism of bucket size control in metering device. (<b>a</b>) Rotatable bucket guide. (<b>b</b>) Bucket size.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Contact calculation node for garlic clove. (<b>a</b>) Group 1. (<b>b</b>) Group 2. (<b>c</b>) Group 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Garlic 3D models. (<b>a</b>) Elongated model. (<b>b</b>) Average model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Contact calculation node for the bucket. (<b>a</b>) Finger-type bucket. (<b>b</b>) Contact calculation node for bucket.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Contact calculation node for the guide. (<b>a</b>) Bucket guide. (<b>b</b>) Contact calculation node for guide.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Bulk density measurement.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Sliding test for the determination of friction coefficient.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Repose angle test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>DEM parameter calibration using repose angle test. (<b>a</b>) Repose angle (test). (<b>b</b>) Repose angle (simulation).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Repose angle according to the friction coefficient of garlic-garlic.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>DEM simulation for the determination of optimal bucket size.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Metering simulation using DEM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Metering experiment equipment. (<b>a</b>) Metering device. (<b>b</b>) 1-row metering test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Overlapped garlic cloves causing multi plant. (<b>a</b>) Front view. (<b>b</b>) Side view.</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 1535 KiB  
Communication
Methodology for Assessing Tractor Traction Properties with Instability of Coupling Weight
by Anatoliy Lebedev, Mykhailo Shuliak, Stanislav Khalin, Sergei Lebedev, Katarzyna Szwedziak, Krzysztof Lejman, Gniewko Niedbała and Tomasz Łusiak
Agriculture 2023, 13(5), 977; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13050977 - 28 Apr 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2897
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to increase the efficiency of using the tractor hitch weight in traction mode by reducing the uneven distribution of vertical reactions between the wheels. This work is grounded on a methodology that involves summarizing and analyzing established [...] Read more.
The purpose of the study is to increase the efficiency of using the tractor hitch weight in traction mode by reducing the uneven distribution of vertical reactions between the wheels. This work is grounded on a methodology that involves summarizing and analyzing established scientific findings related to the theory of tractors operating in traction mode. The analytical method and comparative analysis were employed to establish a scientific problem, define research objectives, and achieve the goal. The key principles of probability theory were applied in developing the empirical models of the tractor. The main provisions of the methodology for evaluating the traction properties of the tractor with the instability of the coupling weight were formulated. The method of evaluating the vertical reactions on the wheels of the tractor is substantiated, which is based on the measurement of the vertical reaction on one of the four wheels. It was proven that tractors with a center of mass offset to the front or rear axles have the greatest probability of equal distribution of vertical reactions between the wheels of one axle, and tractors with a center of mass in the middle between the axles have the lowest probability. It is theoretically substantiated and experimentally confirmed that when the tractor performs plowing work with uneven distribution of loads on the sides, its operation with maximum traction efficiency is ensured by blocking the front and rear axle drivers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soil Mechanical Systems and Related Farming Machinery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Diagram of the forces acting on the tractor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Diagram of the forces acting on the John Deere 8335 R tractor in traction mode.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The density of the distribution of the specific load on one front wheel at the cut-off position of the tractor’s center of mass.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The zone of the most probable values of the reduction in the coefficient of use of the drawbar weight of a two-axle four-wheel drive tractor in traction mode (shaded).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Diagram of the action of forces on the tractor’s wheels during plowing operations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Universal characteristics of traction efficiency of the HTZ-170 tractor in plowing.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 13355 KiB  
Article
Comparison of Consumed Power and Safety of Two Types of Semi-Automatic Vegetable Transplanter: Cam and Four-Bar Link
by Sri Markumningsih, Seok-Joon Hwang, Jeong-Hun Kim, Moon-Kyeong Jang, Chang-Seop Shin and Ju-Seok Nam
Agriculture 2023, 13(3), 588; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13030588 - 28 Feb 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2028
Abstract
The consumed power and safety of cam and four-bar-link semi-automatic vegetable transplanters were analyzed and compared according to the engine speed and planting distances. A measurement system was constructed to obtain the torque, rotational speed, and strain at the corresponding locations of both [...] Read more.
The consumed power and safety of cam and four-bar-link semi-automatic vegetable transplanters were analyzed and compared according to the engine speed and planting distances. A measurement system was constructed to obtain the torque, rotational speed, and strain at the corresponding locations of both transplanters. Field tests were conducted at three engine speeds and three planting distances for each type of transplanter. The torque and rotational speed data of the input shaft of the transplanting devices were used to calculate the power consumed during transplanting. The strain data were converted into stress values to calculate the static safety factor and fatigue life. The results show that the torque and consumed power of the cam transplanter were greater than those of the four-bar-link transplanter under similar operational conditions, owing to its rigid and heavier design. The consumed power increased as the engine speed increased for both types. The static safety factor and fatigue life exhibited different values depending on the measurement location with a sufficient safety margin. Although more skill is required in planting distance control owing to its manual adjustment, the four-bar-link type is more economical under similar operating conditions because of its smaller power requirement. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soil Mechanical Systems and Related Farming Machinery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>View of cam semi-automatic vegetable transplanter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>View of four-bar-link semi-automatic vegetable transplanter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Shapes of the transplanting devices of the semi-automatic vegetable transplanter types: (<b>a</b>) cam and (<b>b</b>) four-bar link.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Measurement system for the cam vegetable transplanter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Measurement system for the four-bar-link vegetable transplanter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Location of torque and rpm sensors installed on cam vegetable transplanter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Location of torque and rpm sensor installed on four-bar-link vegetable transplanter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Reduction gear ratio of the transmission system: (<b>a</b>) cam and (<b>b</b>) four-bar-link types.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8 Cont.
<p>Reduction gear ratio of the transmission system: (<b>a</b>) cam and (<b>b</b>) four-bar-link types.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Location of the strain gauge on the transplanting device: (<b>a</b>) cam and (<b>b</b>) four-bar-link types.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9 Cont.
<p>Location of the strain gauge on the transplanting device: (<b>a</b>) cam and (<b>b</b>) four-bar-link types.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Fatigue life calculation procedure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Measured torque of transplanting device input shaft at a planting distance of 0.35 m: (<b>a</b>) cam and (<b>b</b>) four-bar-link types.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Measured torque of the transplanting device input shaft at an engine speed of 1250 rpm: (<b>a</b>) cam and (<b>b</b>) four-bar-link types.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Comparison of torque on the transplanting device input shaft between cam and four-bar-link types according to working conditions: (<b>a</b>) engine speed and (<b>b</b>) planting distance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13 Cont.
<p>Comparison of torque on the transplanting device input shaft between cam and four-bar-link types according to working conditions: (<b>a</b>) engine speed and (<b>b</b>) planting distance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Comparison of consumed powers on transplanting device input shafts between cam and four-bar-link types according to working conditions: (<b>a</b>) engine speed and (<b>b</b>) planting distance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Comparison of static safety factor between cam and four-bar-link types on every strain gauge location in the transplanting device according to working conditions: (<b>a</b>) engine speed and (<b>b</b>) planting distance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15 Cont.
<p>Comparison of static safety factor between cam and four-bar-link types on every strain gauge location in the transplanting device according to working conditions: (<b>a</b>) engine speed and (<b>b</b>) planting distance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Comparison of fatigue life between cam and four-bar-link types on every strain gauge location on the transplanting device according to working conditions: (<b>a</b>) engine speed and (<b>b</b>) planting distance.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 4804 KiB  
Article
Investigating the Effect of Tractor’s Tire Parameters on Soil Compaction Using Statistical and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) Methods
by Gholamhossein Shahgholi, Abdolmajid Moinfar, Ali Khoramifar, Sprawka Maciej and Mariusz Szymanek
Agriculture 2023, 13(2), 259; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13020259 - 20 Jan 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2332
Abstract
Many factors contribute to soil compaction. One of these factors is the pressure applied by tires and tillage tools. The aim of this study was to study soil compaction under two sizes of tractor tire, considering the effect of tire pressure and traffic [...] Read more.
Many factors contribute to soil compaction. One of these factors is the pressure applied by tires and tillage tools. The aim of this study was to study soil compaction under two sizes of tractor tire, considering the effect of tire pressure and traffic on different depths of soil. Additionally, to predict soil density under the tire, an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) was used. An ITM70 tractor equipped with a lister was used. Standard cylindrical cores were used and soil samples were taken at four depths of the soil inside the tire tracks. Tests were conducted based on a randomized complete-block design with three replications. We tested two types of narrow and normal tire using three inflation pressures, at traffic levels of 1, 3 and 5 passes and four depths of 10, 20, 30 and 40 cm. A grid partition structure and four types of membership function, namely triangular, trapezoid, Gaussian and General bell were used to model soil compaction. Analysis of variance showed that tire size was significant on soil density change, and also, the binary effect of tire size on depth and traffic were significant at 1%. The main effects of tire pressure, traffic and depth were significant on soil compaction at 1% level of significance for both tire types. The inputs of the ANFIS model included tire type, depth of soil, number of tire passes and tire inflation pressure. To evaluate the performance of the model, the relative error (ε) and the coefficient of explanation (R2) were used, which were 1.05 and 0.9949, respectively. It was found that the narrow tire was more effective on soil compaction such that the narrow tire significantly increased soil density in the surface and subsurface layers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soil Mechanical Systems and Related Farming Machinery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Determining the critical soil moisture using the proctor test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Passing the tractor with two types of tires on the field.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Placement of the cylinders inside the soil profile.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Structure topology of the neural-fuzzy adaptive fuzzy inference system (ANFIS).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Membership functions used to represent inputs (<b>a</b>) Triangular, (<b>b</b>) Trapezoidal, (<b>c</b>) Gaussian, (<b>d</b>) Bell-shaped.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5 Cont.
<p>Membership functions used to represent inputs (<b>a</b>) Triangular, (<b>b</b>) Trapezoidal, (<b>c</b>) Gaussian, (<b>d</b>) Bell-shaped.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The main effect of tire type and depth on soil bulk density (different English alphabets shows significant difference between treatments).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The main effect of tire type and traffic on soil bulk density (different English alphabets shows significant difference between treatments).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Relationship between measured and predicted values of soil bulk density.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Deviation distance of predicted values of ANFIS and regression models from measured values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Binary effect of tire type and soil depth on the soil bulk density.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Binary effect tire inflation pressure and traffic on the soil bulk density.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Tire type and traffic effect on the soil bulk density.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Three-dimensional surface curve of the main effect of tire type pressure and tire pressure on the soil bulk density of the soil.</p>
Full article ">

Other

Jump to: Editorial, Research

18 pages, 15171 KiB  
Technical Note
Development of Autofeeding Device Applicable to a Biodegradable Pot Tray
by Seok-Joon Hwang, Moon-Kyeong Jang and Ju-Seok Nam
Agriculture 2022, 12(12), 2097; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12122097 - 7 Dec 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1900
Abstract
In this study, a pot autofeeding device for a biodegradable pot tray was developed. The tensile strength and bending strength were measured to identify the physical properties of the biodegradable pot tray. As a result of the measurement, the tensile strength and bending [...] Read more.
In this study, a pot autofeeding device for a biodegradable pot tray was developed. The tensile strength and bending strength were measured to identify the physical properties of the biodegradable pot tray. As a result of the measurement, the tensile strength and bending strength of the biodegradable pot tray were 0.06 and 0.17 times smaller than those of the plastic pot tray. Therefore, a new type of pot tray extraction mechanism was designed, considering the physical properties, dimensions, and geometry of the biodegradable pot tray, and it was applied to the pot autofeeding device. The developed pot autofeeding device consists of a pot slot, pot-separating blades, pot holders, air cylinders, and a conveyor device. It can supply 240 pot trays per hour to the seeding process without deformation or damage to the biodegradable pot tray. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soil Mechanical Systems and Related Farming Machinery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Dimensions of the biodegradable pot tray.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Deflection shape of biodegradable pot tray caused by its self-weight.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Picture of the mechanical pot tray seeding machine commonly used in agriculture.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>View of the pot autofeeding device with a hook-type separator applied.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>View of the pot autofeeding device with a flat-type separator applied.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>View of the pot autofeeding device with a roller-type separator applied.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>View of the universal testing machine used.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>View of the specimen for measuring the tensile and bending stresses.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Shape of the pot slot.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Shape of the pot-separating blade.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Shape of the pot holder.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Shape of 3D model that the air cylinders applied to the pot autofeeding device.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Shape of the conveyor device.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Shape of the pot autofeeding device.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14 Cont.
<p>Shape of the pot autofeeding device.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Operating procedure of the pot autofeeding device for the biodegradable pot tray: (<bold>a</bold>) an initial condition; (<bold>b</bold>) supplying the biodegradable pot tray into the pot slot; (<bold>c</bold>) the shape of the pot separating blades before inserting; (<bold>d</bold>) inserting of pot separating blades into the spaces of biodegradable pot tray; (<bold>e</bold>) the shape of pot separating blades after inserting; (<bold>f</bold>) the pot holders move to the outside of the plot slot; (<bold>g</bold>) the lower pot-separating blade moves downward for separating the bottom biodegradable pot tray; (<bold>h</bold>) separated biodegradable pot tray drops onto the conveyor belt to be transported to the seeding process; (<bold>i</bold>) the pot holders return to the inside of the pot slot; (<bold>j</bold>) the pot-separating blades return toward the outside of the pot slot.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15 Cont.
<p>Operating procedure of the pot autofeeding device for the biodegradable pot tray: (<bold>a</bold>) an initial condition; (<bold>b</bold>) supplying the biodegradable pot tray into the pot slot; (<bold>c</bold>) the shape of the pot separating blades before inserting; (<bold>d</bold>) inserting of pot separating blades into the spaces of biodegradable pot tray; (<bold>e</bold>) the shape of pot separating blades after inserting; (<bold>f</bold>) the pot holders move to the outside of the plot slot; (<bold>g</bold>) the lower pot-separating blade moves downward for separating the bottom biodegradable pot tray; (<bold>h</bold>) separated biodegradable pot tray drops onto the conveyor belt to be transported to the seeding process; (<bold>i</bold>) the pot holders return to the inside of the pot slot; (<bold>j</bold>) the pot-separating blades return toward the outside of the pot slot.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>The picture of conduction the performance evaluation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Picture of the biodegradable pot tray used for confirming the deformation and damage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17 Cont.
<p>Picture of the biodegradable pot tray used for confirming the deformation and damage.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop