Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Next Issue
Volume 9, MaxEnt 2023
Previous Issue
Volume 7, ECU 2023
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 

Phys. Sci. Forum, 2023, NuFACT 2022

The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators

Salt Lake City, UT, USA | 31 July–6 August 2022

Volume Editors:
Carsten Rott, University of Utah, USA
Yue Zhao, University of Utah, USA

Number of Papers: 73
  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Cover Story (view full-size image): NuFACT 2022 is the 23rd out of a series of yearly international workshops which started in 1999 and which had previously been called the International Workshop on Neutrino Factories. The change of [...] Read more.
Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Other

8 pages, 501 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Potential Constraints to Neutrino–Nucleus Interactions Based on Electron Scattering Data
by Vishvas Pandey
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008001 - 6 Jun 2023
Viewed by 961
Abstract
A thorough understanding of neutrino–nucleus interaction physics is crucial to achieving precision goals in broader neutrino physics programs. The complexity of the nuclei comprising the detectors and the limited understanding of their weak response constitute two of the biggest systematic uncertainties in neutrino [...] Read more.
A thorough understanding of neutrino–nucleus interaction physics is crucial to achieving precision goals in broader neutrino physics programs. The complexity of the nuclei comprising the detectors and the limited understanding of their weak response constitute two of the biggest systematic uncertainties in neutrino experiments—both at intermediate energies affecting short- and long-baseline neutrino programs and at lower energies affecting coherent scattering neutrino programs. While electron and neutrino interactions are different at the primary vertex, many underlying relevant physical processes in the nucleus are the same in both cases, and electron scattering data collected with precisely controlled kinematics, large statistics, and high precision allow one to constrain nuclear properties and specific interaction processes. To this end, electron–nucleus scattering experiments provide vital complementary information to test, assess, and validate different nuclear models and event generators intended to be used in neutrino experiments. In fact, for many decades, the study of electron scattering off a nucleus has been used as a tool to probe the properties of that nucleus and its electromagnetic response. While previously existing electron scattering data provide important information, new and proposed measurements are tied closely to what is required for the neutrino program in terms of expanding kinematic reach, the addition of relevant nuclei, and information on the final-state hadronic system. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Diagrammatic representation of (<b>a</b>) electron–nucleus and (<b>b</b>) neutrino–nucleus scattering processes (<math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>l</mi><mo>=</mo><mi>e</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>μ</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>τ</mi></mrow></semantics></math>), where X represents outgoing hadronic final state.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Kinematic coverage of the ongoing and planned electron scattering experiments for electron scattering on targets, including argon and titanium, presented in the (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mo>(</mo><mo>|</mo><mi mathvariant="bold">q</mi><mo>|</mo><mo>,</mo><mi>ω</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></semantics></math> and (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mo>(</mo><mo>|</mo><mi mathvariant="bold">q</mi><mo>|</mo><mo>,</mo><mi>W</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></semantics></math> planes. The thin solid dashed and dotted lines correspond to the kinematics of quasielastic scattering, <math display="inline"><semantics><mo>Δ</mo></semantics></math> excitation, and the onset of deep-inelastic scattering at <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>W</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>1.7</mn></mrow></semantics></math> GeV on free nucleons. Figure taken from Ref. [<a href="#B2-psf-08-00001" class="html-bibr">2</a>].</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 1117 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Oscillation Physics Potential of JUNO
by Jinnan Zhang
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008002 - 19 Jun 2023
Viewed by 754
Abstract
The Jiangmen Underground Neutrino Observatory is a 20 kton multipurpose liquid scintillator detector located at a 700 m underground laboratory in South China (Jiangmen City, Guangdong Province). The exceptional energy resolution and the massive volume of the JUNO detector offer great opportunities for [...] Read more.
The Jiangmen Underground Neutrino Observatory is a 20 kton multipurpose liquid scintillator detector located at a 700 m underground laboratory in South China (Jiangmen City, Guangdong Province). The exceptional energy resolution and the massive volume of the JUNO detector offer great opportunities for addressing many essential topics in neutrino and astroparticle physics. JUNO’s primary goals are to determine the neutrino mass ordering and precisely measure the related neutrino oscillation parameters. With reactor neutrino data, JUNO can determine the neutrino mass ordering with significent precision and measure the neutrino oscillation parameters sin2θ12, Δm212, and Δm312/Δm322 to the sub-percent precision level. In addition, the atmospheric and solar neutrino measurements at JUNO can also provide important information for oscillation physics. This paper focuses on the oscillation physics potential of JUNO, including the sensitivity analysis and results based on the recent understanding of the detector. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p><b>Left:</b> Visible energy spectrum expected in JUNO detector as measured with (grey) and without (black) backgrounds. The inset shows the spectra of the expected backgrounds in log scale. <b>Right:</b> Visible energy spectra of reactor <math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mover><mi>ν</mi><mo>¯</mo></mover><mi>e</mi></msub></semantics></math> signal (blue) and total backgrounds (orange).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p><b>Left:</b> The NMO discriminator <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mo>Δ</mo><msubsup><mi>χ</mi><mi>min</mi><mn>2</mn></msubsup><mo>≡</mo><msubsup><mi>χ</mi><mi>min</mi><mn>2</mn></msubsup><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>IO</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo>−</mo><msubsup><mi>χ</mi><mi>min</mi><mn>2</mn></msubsup><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>NO</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></semantics></math> as a function of JUNO exposure time for both normal (red) and inverted (blue) ordering Asimov data set. The solid lines are for the cases of full systematic uncertainties, and the dashed lines are for the statistical-only case. <b>Right:</b> The impact of individual sources of uncertainty on the NMO sensitivity, for the exposure of JUNO reaches 3<math display="inline"><semantics><mi>σ</mi></semantics></math> significance. The filled boxes represent the sensitivity for considering only the statistical uncertainties of the reactor neutrinos. The impact of each source of systematic error is assessed by considering it alone with the statistical uncertainties of the reactor neutrinos, and the <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mo>Δ</mo><msubsup><mi>χ</mi><mi>min</mi><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow></semantics></math> decrease is represented by the empty boxes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Relative precision sensitivity of the oscillation parameters as a function of JUNO data-taking time. The markers and vertical lines stand for 100 days, 6 years, and 20 years of data taking. The green and red dotted lines are on top of each other since the statistical-only precision is essentially identical for the <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mo>Δ</mo><msubsup><mi>m</mi><mn>31</mn><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow></semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mo>Δ</mo><msubsup><mi>m</mi><mn>21</mn><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow></semantics></math> parameters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p><b>Left:</b> Expected visible energy spectra of all single event sources for 10 years of data taking. The upper right insert plot is illustrated for the energy range between 3 and 5 MeV in the linear scale. <b>Right:</b> Expected prompt visible energy spectra of the CC signal and backgrounds after the optimized cuts for 10 years of running.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparison of the sensitivity on the <sup>8</sup>B solar neutrino flux, <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msup><mo form="prefix">sin</mo><mn>2</mn></msup><msub><mi>θ</mi><mn>12</mn></msub></mrow></semantics></math>, and <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mo>Δ</mo><msubsup><mi>m</mi><mn>21</mn><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow></semantics></math> between the ES measurement (single events outside [3.5, 4.1] MeV) and the ES + NC measurement (all single events).</p>
Full article ">
9 pages, 1211 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
The Future of Experimental Muon Physics
by Kevin Lynch
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 3; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008003 - 27 Jun 2023
Viewed by 1070
Abstract
In this talk, I discuss a possible future for the global muon physics program. I focus on the future of flavor studies, precision measurements and searches that can be pursued with a new class of muonium beam sources, and emerging practical applications of [...] Read more.
In this talk, I discuss a possible future for the global muon physics program. I focus on the future of flavor studies, precision measurements and searches that can be pursued with a new class of muonium beam sources, and emerging practical applications of muons in the industrial, academic, and government sectors. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The historical progression of CLFV measurements in the muon and tau sectors over the previous 70 years. Sensitivities have improved by seventeen orders of magnitude, with an addition three orders achievable with plausible technical advancements in the coming years. Image produced by the Mu2e Collaboration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The Mu2e apparatus, one of two under-construction realizations of the MELC experimental concept for muon conversion searches. The full experiment is split into a production section housing the production target, a transport section that sign selects the muons of interest, and a detector section that includes a muon stopping target and detectors optimized to observe the conversion electron signal. More details can be found in the text. Image produced by the Mu2e Collaboration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>A cartoon of the components of the Advanced Muon Facility proposed for Fermilab. The system would require a series of new components—a proton compressor ring (not shown), a new production solenoid and target system, a muon transport line, and a Fixed Field Alternating (FFA) Gradient storage ring. Additional effort will be required to build and operate experiments that could be attached to the output of the FFA; shown here is a conversion search experiment. Image produced by the AMF Collaboration.</p>
Full article ">
7 pages, 10118 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Searching for Muon to Electron Conversion with the COMET Experiment
by Sam Dekkers
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 4; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008004 - 27 Jun 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1037
Abstract
Charged lepton flavour violation processes provide a well-motivated experimental probe into new physics beyond the Standard Model. Muon to electron conversion is one example that the COMET experiment aims to measure with increased sensitivity over previous searches. Taking a staged approach, the COMET [...] Read more.
Charged lepton flavour violation processes provide a well-motivated experimental probe into new physics beyond the Standard Model. Muon to electron conversion is one example that the COMET experiment aims to measure with increased sensitivity over previous searches. Taking a staged approach, the COMET experiment will measure muon to electron conversion with sensitivities of O(1015) and O(1017) in Phase-I and Phase-II, respectively. An important initial low-intensity beam run, Phase-α, is also planned to begin in 2023 with Phase-I following in 2024. This article summarises the COMET experiment and the recent progress made towards the beginning of physics runs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The COMET experiment is taking a phased approach with Phase-I (<b>top left</b>) and Phase-II (<b>top right</b>). An initial low-intensity beam run, Phase-<math display="inline"><semantics><mi>α</mi></semantics></math> (<b>bottom centre</b>), will take place first.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The CTH detector provides timing information for COMET Phase-I and utilises scintillator counters with MPPC photodetectors for photon readout. Recent progress includes preliminary beam tests with prototype counters using 100 MeV electrons at the Australian Synchrotron (<b>left</b>) and MPPC irradiation and cooling tests (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">
7 pages, 410 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Electron–Nucleus Scattering in the NEUT Event Generator
by Stephen Dolan, Jordan McElwee, Sara Bolognesi, Yoshinari Hayato, Kevin McFarland, Guillermo Megias, Kajetan Niewczas, Luke Pickering, Jan Sobczyk, Lee Thompson and Clarence Wret
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 5; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008005 - 28 Jun 2023
Viewed by 714
Abstract
The NEUT event generator is a widely used tool to simulate neutrino interactions for energies between 10 s of MeV and a few TeV. NEUT plays a crucial role in neutrino oscillation analyses for the T2K and Hyper-K experiments, providing the primary simulation [...] Read more.
The NEUT event generator is a widely used tool to simulate neutrino interactions for energies between 10 s of MeV and a few TeV. NEUT plays a crucial role in neutrino oscillation analyses for the T2K and Hyper-K experiments, providing the primary simulation of neutrino interactions, whose final-state products are measured to infer the oscillation parameters. NEUT is also capable of simulating nucleon decay and hadron scattering. These proceedings present an expansion of NEUT to simulate electron scattering before showing comparisons to experimental measurements and using discrepancies to derive an empirical correction to NEUT’s treatment of nuclear removal energy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Inclusive electron cross-section measurements [<a href="#B22-psf-08-00005" class="html-bibr">22</a>] (data points) compared to quasi-elastic electron-scattering generation in NEUT (blue histogram) as a function of energy transfer. The comparison is made for a number of different scattering angles and beam energies. The peaks are fitted with a fifth-order polynomial to extract the position (the smooth lines), and the difference between the peak positions is shown on each plot (“shift”, in GeV). The <math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>q</mi><mn>3</mn></msub></semantics></math> calculated at the peak position of the cross-section measurement (“<math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>q</mi><mn>3</mn></msub></semantics></math>”, in GeV/c).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The shifts derived from <a href="#psf-08-00005-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a> are shown as a function of momentum transfer to reveal an approximately linear relationship, as described by the fitted line (<b>a</b>). The derived shift is interpreted as an <math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>E</mi><mrow><mi>r</mi><mi>m</mi><mi>v</mi></mrow></msub></semantics></math> correction and applied within NEUT, and the shifts are re-derived for the corrected model, showing there is no need for further corrections (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The NEUT simulation for CCQE interactions applying (magenta) and not applying (red) the derived <math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>q</mi><mn>3</mn></msub></semantics></math>-dependent removal energy correction on a carbon target using the T2K <math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>ν</mi><mi>μ</mi></msub></semantics></math> flux. The upper plots show the cross-section shape as a function of the energy transfer (<b>left</b>) and reconstructed neutrino energy (<b>right</b>), using the neutrino energy estimator from T2K (using lepton kinematics only [<a href="#B20-psf-08-00005" class="html-bibr">20</a>]). The lower plots show the bias and spread of the neutrino energy estimators used by T2K (<b>left</b>) and NOvA (<b>right</b>, using total energy deposits estimated using <math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>E</mi><mrow><mi>a</mi><mi>v</mi><mi>a</mi><mi>i</mi><mi>l</mi></mrow></msub></semantics></math> from Ref. [<a href="#B26-psf-08-00005" class="html-bibr">26</a>]).</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 2474 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Status of the MEG II Experiment and Performance Results from the First Year’s Data Taking
by Dylan Palo
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 6; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008006 - 29 Jun 2023
Viewed by 838
Abstract
We report on the MEG II experiment, a search for the charged lepton flavor violating (CLFV) decay μ+e+γ. The experiment is designed to improve upon the most sensitive search for the decay, i.e., the MEG experiment, by [...] Read more.
We report on the MEG II experiment, a search for the charged lepton flavor violating (CLFV) decay μ+e+γ. The experiment is designed to improve upon the most sensitive search for the decay, i.e., the MEG experiment, by an order of magnitude. The MEG II experiment aims to reach a final sensitivity of 6×1014 at the 90% confidence level. The experiment completed its first year of data collection in 2021. This proceedings discusses preliminary positron and photon data-driven kinematic resolution measurements and compares them to those of the MEG experiment and the MEG II design expectation. Preliminary estimates of the first year and final experiment sensitivity are presented. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>An example double turn positron track in the 2021 dataset. The green dots represent intersected drift cells with signal in the drift chamber; the yellow tiles represent the pixelated timing counter tiles with signal.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The LXe measured 55 MeV CEX peak at varying depth (w).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The preliminary <math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>t</mi><mrow><mi>e</mi><mi>γ</mi></mrow></msub></semantics></math> resolution for RMD decays in the 2021 MEG physics trigger data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The preliminary sensitivity for the MEG II experiment extrapolated through the lifetime of the experiment.</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 17392 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Neutrino Mass Ordering with IceCube DeepCore
by Maria Prado Rodriguez
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 7; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008007 - 30 Jun 2023
Viewed by 1203
Abstract
The neutrino mass ordering (NMO) is one of the last undetermined properties in the three-neutrino paradigm. NMO studies aim to answer the question of whether the neutrino mass ordering is normal (m3>m2>m1) or inverted [...] Read more.
The neutrino mass ordering (NMO) is one of the last undetermined properties in the three-neutrino paradigm. NMO studies aim to answer the question of whether the neutrino mass ordering is normal (m3>m2>m1) or inverted (m2>m1>m3). We conduct a study of the NMO sensitivity with atmospheric neutrinos using 9.3 years of IceCube DeepCore data, where a new event selection, reconstruction method, particle identification, and systematic uncertainty modeling are used. The goals of this analysis consist of: (1) probing the NMO at neutrino baselines that are not accessible to long-baseline accelerator experiments, (2) contributing to NMO global fit studies in an important and unique way, (3) serving as a detailed study on the NMO in preparation for the upcoming IceCube Upgrade, which should significantly improve the DeepCore NMO sensitivity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Diagram showing the normal ordering (NO), where <math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>ν</mi><mn>3</mn></msub></semantics></math> is the heaviest mass state and <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mo>Δ</mo><msubsup><mi>m</mi><mn>31</mn><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow></semantics></math> is positive, and the inverted ordering (IO), where <math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>ν</mi><mn>3</mn></msub></semantics></math> is the lightest mass state and <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mo>Δ</mo><msubsup><mi>m</mi><mn>31</mn><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow></semantics></math> is negative. The NuFIT v5.1 [<a href="#B1-psf-08-00007" class="html-bibr">1</a>] best fit values were used to generate the color bars.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Oscillograms for the NO (<b>left</b>) and the IO (<b>right</b>) as functions of the <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mo form="prefix">cos</mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><msub><mi>θ</mi><mrow><mi>z</mi><mi>e</mi><mi>n</mi><mi>i</mi><mi>t</mi><mi>h</mi></mrow></msub><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></semantics></math>, which is proportional to the propagation length of the neutrino, and <math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>ν</mi></msub></semantics></math>, the true neutrino energy. Coherent forward scattering with electrons in matter distorts the oscillation probabilities for neutrinos in the case of the NO and for anti-neutrinos in the case of the IO. NuFIT v4.0 [<a href="#B6-psf-08-00007" class="html-bibr">6</a>] is used here for the oscillation parameter values except for <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mo>Δ</mo><msubsup><mi>m</mi><mrow><mn>31</mn></mrow><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow></semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>θ</mi><mn>23</mn></msub></semantics></math>, which use the most recent DeepCore results [<a href="#B7-psf-08-00007" class="html-bibr">7</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Reconstruction resolution for the <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mo form="prefix">cos</mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><msub><mi>θ</mi><mrow><mi>z</mi><mi>e</mi><mi>n</mi><mi>i</mi><mi>t</mi><mi>h</mi></mrow></msub><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></semantics></math> (<b>left</b>) and the neutrino energy (<b>right</b>). The resolution deteriorates at the lowest energies due to the wide spacing of the digital optical modules (DOMs) and, thus, the low number of event hits.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Projected DeepCore neutrino mass ordering (NMO) median sensitivity for a true NO and a true IO using 9.3 years of data. A dependence on the mixing angle, <math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>θ</mi><mn>23</mn></msub></semantics></math>, can be seen due to matter effects manifesting in the form of a change in the amplitude of the oscillation probabilities. This mixing angle is of particular interest for atmospheric neutrino oscillation experiments due to observations of <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msub><mi>ν</mi><mi>μ</mi></msub><mo>→</mo><msub><mi>ν</mi><mi>τ</mi></msub></mrow></semantics></math> oscillations.</p>
Full article ">
5 pages, 4821 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
The ENUBET Monitored Neutrino Beam for High Precision Cross-Section Measurements
by C.C. Delogu, F. Acerbi, I. Angelis, L. Bomben, M. Bonesini, F. Bramati, A. Branca, C. Brizzolari, G. Brunetti, M. Calviani, S. Capelli, S. Carturan, M.G. Catanesi, S. Cecchini, N. Charitonidis, F. Cindolo, G. Cogo, G. Collazuol, F. Dal Corso, G. De Rosa, A. Falcone, B. Goddard, A. Gola, L. Halić, F. Iacob, C. Jollet, V. Kain, A. Kallitsopoulou, B. Klicek, Y. Kudenko, Ch. Lampoudis, M. Laveder, P. Legou, A. Longhin, L. Ludovici, E. Lutsenko, L. Magaletti, G. Mandrioli, S. Marangoni, A. Margotti, V. Mascagna, N. Mauri, L. Meazza, A. Meregaglia, M. Mezzetto, M. Nessi, A. Paoloni, M. Pari, T. Papaevangelou, E.G. Parozzi, L. Pasqualini, G. Paternoster, L. Patrizii, M. Pozzato, M. Prest, F. Pupilli, E. Radicioni, A.C. Ruggeri, D. Sampsonidis, C. Scian, G. Sirri, M. Stipcevic, M. Tenti, F. Terranova, M. Torti, S.E. Tzamarias, E. Vallazza, F. Velotti and L. Votanoadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 8; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008008 - 30 Jun 2023
Viewed by 787
Abstract
The main source of systematic uncertainty on neutrino cross-section measurements at the GeV scale originates from the poor knowledge of the initial flux. The goal of reducing this uncertainty to 1% can be achieved through the monitoring of charged leptons produced in association [...] Read more.
The main source of systematic uncertainty on neutrino cross-section measurements at the GeV scale originates from the poor knowledge of the initial flux. The goal of reducing this uncertainty to 1% can be achieved through the monitoring of charged leptons produced in association with neutrinos, by properly instrumenting the decay region of a conventional narrow-band neutrino beam. Large-angle muons and positrons from kaons are measured by a sampling calorimeter on the decay tunnel walls, while muon stations after the hadron dump can be used to monitor the neutrino component from pion decays. Furthermore, the narrow momentum width (<10%) of the beam provides a O (10%) measurement of the neutrino energy on an event-by-event basis, thanks to its correlation with the radial position of the interaction at the neutrino detector. The ENUBET project has been funded by the ERC in 2016 to prove the feasibility of such a monitored neutrino beam and, since 2019, ENUBET is also a CERN neutrino platform experiment (NP06/ENUBET). The breakthrough the project achieved is the design of a horn-less neutrino beamline that would allow for a 1% measurement of νe and νμ cross-sections in about 3 years of data taking at CERN-SPS, using ProtoDUNE as far detector. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Latest beamline design. Focusing quadrupoles and bending dipoles are shown in gray and orange, respectively. Collimators are made of Iron (blue) or Inermet180 (violet). The decay tunnel (yellow), the hadron dump (light grey) and the proton dump (green) are also shown.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Particle budget at the decay tunnel entrance. The rates obtained for a momentum of 8.5 ± 5% GeV are <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>4.13</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mn>10</mn><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>3</mn></mrow></msup><mspace width="3.33333pt"/><msup><mi>π</mi><mo>+</mo></msup><mo>/</mo><mi>POT</mi></mrow></semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>0.34</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mn>10</mn><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>3</mn></mrow></msup><mspace width="3.33333pt"/><msup><mi>K</mi><mo>+</mo></msup><mo>/</mo><mi>POT</mi></mrow></semantics></math>. (<b>b</b>) Energy spectrum of the <math display="inline"><semantics><msubsup><mi>ν</mi><mi>e</mi><mrow><mi>C</mi><mi>C</mi></mrow></msubsup></semantics></math> interactions in the neutrino detector. Colored lines represent the neutrino contribution generated in a specific area of the transfer line, with the neutrinos generated inside the tagger (in red) representing ∼80% of spectrum above 1 GeV. The most relevant component below this threshold is the one coming from the proton dump (in cyan), whose position and shape are still to be fine−tuned.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Event topology for the ENUBET calorimeter. EM shower from a positron, top; EM shower from a <math display="inline"><semantics><msup><mi>π</mi><mn>0</mn></msup></semantics></math>, middle; hadronic shower from a <math display="inline"><semantics><msup><mi>π</mi><mo>+</mo></msup></semantics></math>, bottom. The modules involved in a typical <math display="inline"><semantics><msup><mi>e</mi><mo>+</mo></msup></semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics><msup><mi>π</mi><mn>0</mn></msup></semantics></math> or <math display="inline"><semantics><msup><mi>π</mi><mo>+</mo></msup></semantics></math> event are marked in red. In the <math display="inline"><semantics><msup><mi>π</mi><mn>0</mn></msup></semantics></math> case, photons coming from its decay do not leave any signal in the t0 doublet. (<b>b</b>) The demonstrator.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Reconstructed events after the application of the neural network. (<b>a</b>) Visible energy of <math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>K</mi><mrow><mi>e</mi><mn>3</mn></mrow></msub></semantics></math> positrons. (<b>b</b>) Impact point along calorimeter wall of muons from <math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>K</mi><mrow><mi>μ</mi><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></semantics></math>. In both plots, the background contributions are also reported as in the legend.</p>
Full article ">
5 pages, 386 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Can Deviation from Maximal θ23 Be Resolved in DUNE?
by Masoom Singh, Ritam Kundu, Sanjib Kumar Agarwalla and Suprabh Prakash
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 9; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008009 - 6 Jul 2023
Viewed by 617
Abstract
Current global analyses of 3ν oscillation data point towards non-maximal θ23, but the maximal value of θ23=45 is still allowed at 3σ confidence level. It is expected that DUNE will establish the non-maximal value of [...] Read more.
Current global analyses of 3ν oscillation data point towards non-maximal θ23, but the maximal value of θ23=45 is still allowed at 3σ confidence level. It is expected that DUNE will establish the non-maximal value of θ23 at high confidence level if θ2345 in nature. In this work, we present, in detail, the sensitivity of DUNE to establish the deviation from maximal θ23. We find that a 3σ (5σ) determination of non-maximal θ23 is possible in DUNE with an exposure of 336 kt·MW·years, if the true value of sin2θ230.465(0.450) or sin2θ230.554(0.572) for any value of true δCP and true choice of normal mass ordering. We also discuss the extent of individual contributions from appearance and disappearance channels and the impacts of systematic uncertainties and total exposure, while addressing the discovery of non-maximal of θ23 in DUNE. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The black curve depicts the potential of DUNE to establish the deviation from maximal <math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>θ</mi><mn>23</mn></msub></semantics></math> as a function of true <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msup><mo form="prefix">sin</mo><mn>2</mn></msup><msub><mi>θ</mi><mn>23</mn></msub></mrow></semantics></math>, assuming true NMO and <math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>δ</mi><mi>CP</mi></msub></semantics></math> (true) = 223<math display="inline"><semantics><msup><mrow/><mo>∘</mo></msup></semantics></math>, considering 336 kt·MW·years of exposure. The red band portrays the same for any true choice of <math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>δ</mi><mi>CP</mi></msub></semantics></math> in its current 3<math display="inline"><semantics><mi>σ</mi></semantics></math> range. In the fit, we marginalize over the current 3<math display="inline"><semantics><mi>σ</mi></semantics></math> range of <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mo>Δ</mo><msubsup><mi>m</mi><mn>31</mn><mn>2</mn></msubsup><mo>:</mo><mrow><mo>[</mo><mn>2.436</mn><mspace width="0.166667em"/><mo>,</mo><mspace width="0.166667em"/><mn>2.605</mn><mo>]</mo></mrow><mo>×</mo><msup><mn>10</mn><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>3</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></semantics></math> eV<math display="inline"><semantics><msup><mrow/><mn>2</mn></msup></semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msub><mi>δ</mi><mi>CP</mi></msub><mo>:</mo><mrow><mo>[</mo><msup><mn>139</mn><mo>∘</mo></msup><mspace width="0.166667em"/><mo>,</mo><mspace width="0.166667em"/><msup><mn>355</mn><mo>∘</mo></msup><mo>]</mo></mrow></mrow></semantics></math>, keeping all other oscillation parameters fixed at their benchmark values, as mentioned before. The dark- and light-shaded gray areas show the currently allowed <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>1</mn><mi>σ</mi></mrow></semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>2</mn><mi>σ</mi></mrow></semantics></math> ranges, respectively, in <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msup><mo form="prefix">sin</mo><mn>2</mn></msup><msub><mi>θ</mi><mn>23</mn></msub></mrow></semantics></math>, as obtained in the global fit study [<a href="#B1-psf-08-00009" class="html-bibr">1</a>]. The present best-fit value of <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msup><mo form="prefix">sin</mo><mn>2</mn></msup><msub><mi>θ</mi><mn>23</mn></msub><mo>=</mo><mn>0.455</mn></mrow></semantics></math> is shown by a vertical brown line. The horizontal orange lines show the sensitivities for the current best-fit and 1<math display="inline"><semantics><mi>σ</mi></semantics></math> upper and lower bounds of <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msup><mo form="prefix">sin</mo><mn>2</mn></msup><msub><mi>θ</mi><mn>23</mn></msub></mrow></semantics></math>. This figure is taken from Ref. [<a href="#B6-psf-08-00009" class="html-bibr">6</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Potential of DUNE to establish deviation from non-maximal <math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>θ</mi><mn>23</mn></msub></semantics></math> as a function of true <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msup><mo form="prefix">sin</mo><mn>2</mn></msup><msub><mi>θ</mi><mn>23</mn></msub></mrow></semantics></math>, assuming true NMO and <math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>δ</mi><mi>CP</mi></msub></semantics></math> (true) = 223<math display="inline"><semantics><msup><mrow/><mo>∘</mo></msup></semantics></math> with 336 kt·MW·years of exposure. The red-, blue-, and black-colored curves represent the potential of disappearance channel, appearance channel, and their combinations, respectively. The solid (dashed) lines depict the results with (without) systematic uncertainties. In the fit, we marginalize over the current 3<math display="inline"><semantics><mi>σ</mi></semantics></math> range of <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mo>Δ</mo><msubsup><mi>m</mi><mn>31</mn><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow></semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>δ</mi><mi>CP</mi></msub></semantics></math>. The present best-fit value of <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msup><mo form="prefix">sin</mo><mn>2</mn></msup><msub><mi>θ</mi><mn>23</mn></msub><mo>=</mo><mn>0.455</mn></mrow></semantics></math> is shown by a vertical brown line. The horizontal pink dotted line depicts the performance of DUNE at 3<math display="inline"><semantics><mi>σ</mi></semantics></math> C.L. This figure is taken from Ref. [<a href="#B6-psf-08-00009" class="html-bibr">6</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Sensitivity towards deviation from maximal <math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>θ</mi><mn>23</mn></msub></semantics></math> as a function of total exposure, equally divided into neutrino and antineutrino modes. Results are shown at <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>3</mn><mi>σ</mi></mrow></semantics></math> (yellow curves), <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>2</mn><mi>σ</mi></mrow></semantics></math> (blue curves), and <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>1</mn><mi>σ</mi></mrow></semantics></math> (green curves) C.L., assuming true NMO and <math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>δ</mi><mi>CP</mi></msub></semantics></math> (true) = 223<math display="inline"><semantics><msup><mrow/><mo>∘</mo></msup></semantics></math>. In the fit, we marginalize over <math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>δ</mi><mi>CP</mi></msub></semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mo>Δ</mo><msubsup><mi>m</mi><mn>31</mn><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow></semantics></math> in their 3<math display="inline"><semantics><mi>σ</mi></semantics></math> allowed ranges. This figure is taken from Ref. [<a href="#B6-psf-08-00009" class="html-bibr">6</a>].</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 292 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
From Inclusive to Semi-Inclusive One-Nucleon Knockout in Neutrino Event Generators
by Alexis Nikolakopoulos, Steven Gardiner, Afroditi Papadopoulou, Stephen Dolan and Raúl González-Jiménez
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 10; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008010 - 13 Jul 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 619
Abstract
In neutrino event generators, for models for neutrino and electron scattering, only inclusive cross sections are implemented. When these models are used to describe a semi-inclusive cross section, the event generator attaches the hadron variables based on some assumptions. In this work, we [...] Read more.
In neutrino event generators, for models for neutrino and electron scattering, only inclusive cross sections are implemented. When these models are used to describe a semi-inclusive cross section, the event generator attaches the hadron variables based on some assumptions. In this work, we compared the nucleon kinematics given by the method used in the GENIE event generator, e.g., in the implementation of the SuSAv2 model, to a fully unfactorized calculation using the relativistic distorted wave impulse approximation (RDWIA). We focused on kinematics relevant to the e4ν analysis and showed that observables obtained with RDWIA differ significantly from those of the approximate method used in GENIE; the latter should be considered unrealistic. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Distributions of nucleon kinetic energy (<b>left</b>) and scattering angle with respect to the electron beam (<b>right</b>). Results for scattering of <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>1.159</mn><mspace width="3.33333pt"/><mi>GeV</mi></mrow></semantics></math> electrons of carbon. The red lines show the unfactorized RDWIA calculation using the ED-RMF potential, the blue lines show the result of the algorithm used in GENIE that uses the same inclusive cross section as input.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Distributions of transverse momentum (<b>left</b>) and scattering angle with respect to the electron beam (<b>right</b>). Results for scattering of <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>1.159</mn><mspace width="3.33333pt"/><mi>GeV</mi></mrow></semantics></math> electrons of carbon. The solid lines correspond to the same calculations as in <a href="#psf-08-00010-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>. The corresponding dashed lines use in addition the GENIE hN INC model.</p>
Full article ">
5 pages, 834 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Energy Reconstruction and Calibration of the MicroBooNE LArTPC
by Wanwei Wu
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008011 - 14 Jul 2023
Viewed by 630
Abstract
The Liquid Argon Time Projection Chamber (LArTPC) is increasingly becoming the chosen technology for current and future precision neutrino oscillation experiments due to its superior capability in particle tracking and energy calorimetry. In LArTPCs, calorimetric information is critical for particle identification, which is [...] Read more.
The Liquid Argon Time Projection Chamber (LArTPC) is increasingly becoming the chosen technology for current and future precision neutrino oscillation experiments due to its superior capability in particle tracking and energy calorimetry. In LArTPCs, calorimetric information is critical for particle identification, which is the foundation for neutrino cross-sections and oscillation measurements, as well as searches for beyond-standard-model physics. One of the primary challenges in employing LArTPC technology is characterizing its performance and quantifying the associated systematic uncertainties. MicroBooNE, the longest-operating LArTPC to date, has performed numerous such measurements, including studies of detector physics and electromagnetic shower reconstruction. Here, we present results on the operation and performance of the detector during its data taking, highlighting accomplishments toward calorimetric reconstruction, calibration, and detector physics. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Event displays of an example neutrino candidate from MicroBooNE data (run 3493, event 41,075) showing a <span class="html-italic">Y</span>-plane view through each stage of signal processing. Figure is taken from Ref. [<a href="#B7-psf-08-00011" class="html-bibr">7</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Results of the calculation of electric field distortion magnitude for a central slice in <span class="html-italic">z</span>, comparing Monte Carlo simulation (<b>left</b>) to data (<b>right</b>). The distortion is due to SCE. Figure is taken from Ref. [<a href="#B9-psf-08-00011" class="html-bibr">9</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Calibrated and uncalibrated <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>d</mi><mi>Q</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>d</mi><mi>x</mi></mrow></semantics></math> from crossing muons in MicroBooNE data in the collection plane (<b>left</b>), and comparison between the predicted and fitted most probable <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>d</mi><mi>E</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>d</mi><mi>x</mi></mrow></semantics></math> values for stopping muons in MicroBooNE data using the collection plane (<b>right</b>). Plots are taken from Ref. [<a href="#B8-psf-08-00011" class="html-bibr">8</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Ratio (data/simulation) and fitted simulation modification functions for mean hit width vs. <span class="html-italic">x</span> on each of the three wire planes (<b>left</b>), and measured diphoton invariant mass distribution using BNB beam data with uncertainties (<b>right</b>). Plots are taken from Ref. [<a href="#B11-psf-08-00011" class="html-bibr">11</a>].</p>
Full article ">
7 pages, 1112 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Transverse Enhancement, Longitudinal Quenching and Coulomb Sum Rule in e-12C and e-16O Quasielastic Scattering
by Arie Bodek and Michael Eric Christy
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 12; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008012 - 18 Jul 2023
Viewed by 567
Abstract
We present a short summary of a phenomenological analysis of all available electron scattering data on 12C (about 6600 differential cross-section measurements) and on 16O (about 250 measurements) within the framework of the quasielastic (QE) superscaling model (including Pauli blocking). All [...] Read more.
We present a short summary of a phenomenological analysis of all available electron scattering data on 12C (about 6600 differential cross-section measurements) and on 16O (about 250 measurements) within the framework of the quasielastic (QE) superscaling model (including Pauli blocking). All QE and inelastic cross-section measurements are included down to the lowest momentum transfer 3-vector q (including photo-production data). We find that there is enhancement of the transverse QE response function (RTQE) and quenching of the QE longitudinal response function (RLQE) at low q (in addition to Pauli blocking). We extract parameterizations of a multiplicative low q “longitudinal quenching factor” and an additive “transverse enhancement” contribution. The fit can be used as a proxy to validate the modeling of cross sections in Monte Carlo event generators for electron and neutrino (νe,μ) scattering. Additionally, we find that the excitation of nuclear states contributes significantly (up to 30%) to the Coulomb sum rule SL(q). We extract the most accurate determination of SL(q) to date and find it to be in disagreement with random phase approximation (RPA) based calculations but in reasonable agreement with recent theoretical calculations, such as “first-principle Green’s function Monte Carlo”. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Top two panels: comparison of <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msub><mi>R</mi><mi>L</mi></msub><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi mathvariant="bold">q</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>ν</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></semantics></math> extracted from our <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msup><mrow/><mn>12</mn></msup><mi mathvariant="normal">C</mi></mrow></semantics></math> fit to a sample of experimental data [<a href="#B6-psf-08-00012" class="html-bibr">6</a>]. For excitation energies &lt;12 MeV, the values are multiplied by 1/6. Bottom two panels: the contributions of longitudinal nuclear excitations (between 2 and 55 MeV) to the Coulomb sum rule for <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msup><mrow/><mn>12</mn></msup><mi mathvariant="normal">C</mi></mrow></semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msup><mrow/><mn>16</mn></msup><mi mathvariant="normal">O</mi></mrow></semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Comparison of the fit to electron scattering <math display="inline"><semantics><mfrac><mrow><msup><mi>d</mi><mn>2</mn></msup><mi>σ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>d</mi><mi mathvariant="sans-serif">Ω</mi><mi>d</mi><mi>ν</mi></mrow></mfrac></semantics></math> measurements at <math display="inline"><semantics><mi mathvariant="bold">q</mi></semantics></math> values close to 0.30, 0.38 and 0.57 GeV (and different scattering angles). Shown are total <math display="inline"><semantics><mfrac><mrow><msup><mi>d</mi><mn>2</mn></msup><mi>σ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>d</mi><mi mathvariant="sans-serif">Ω</mi><mi>d</mi><mi>ν</mi></mrow></mfrac></semantics></math> (solid purple line), total minus the contribution of the nuclear excitations (solid blue), the QE cross section without TE (dashed blue), the TE(<math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi mathvariant="bold">q</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>ν</mi></mrow></semantics></math>) contribution (solid red) and inelastic pion production (dot-dashed black line).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p><b>Top left</b> panel: QE “longitudinal quenching factor” (dotted-black line with yellow error band). <b>Top right</b> panel: the various contributions to <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>S</mi><mi>L</mi><mo>(</mo><mi mathvariant="bold">q</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></semantics></math> for <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msup><mrow/><mn>12</mn></msup><mi mathvariant="normal">C</mi></mrow></semantics></math> (dotted blue with yellow error band) including QE with Pauli suppression only (dotted purple), QE suppressed by both “Pauli” and “longitudinal quenching” (solid green), and the contribution of nuclear excitations (red dashed with green error band). <b>Bottom left</b> panel: <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>S</mi><mi>L</mi><mo>(</mo><mi mathvariant="bold">q</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></semantics></math> for <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msup><mrow/><mn>12</mn></msup><mi mathvariant="normal">C</mi></mrow></semantics></math> (dotted blue with yellow error band) compared to theoretical calculations including Lovato et al. [<a href="#B11-psf-08-00012" class="html-bibr">11</a>] (solid purple), Mihaila and Heisenberg [<a href="#B12-psf-08-00012" class="html-bibr">12</a>] (dashed green), and RPA Cloet et al. [<a href="#B13-psf-08-00012" class="html-bibr">13</a>] (solid red). <b>Bottom right</b> panel: <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>S</mi><mi>L</mi><mo>(</mo><mi mathvariant="bold">q</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></semantics></math> for <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msup><mrow/><mn>16</mn></msup><mi mathvariant="normal">O</mi></mrow></semantics></math> (dotted dark blue with light blue error band) compared to theoretical calculations of Sobczyk et al. [<a href="#B14-psf-08-00012" class="html-bibr">14</a>] (red dashed) and Mihaila and Heisenberg [<a href="#B12-psf-08-00012" class="html-bibr">12</a>] (dotted dashed).</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 5290 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Options for PMT Electronics for the Hyper-Kamiokande Far Detector
by Shota Izumiyama
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 13; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008013 - 19 Jul 2023
Viewed by 789
Abstract
The Hyper-Kamiokande is a next-generation neutrinos and nucleon decay experiment. It consists of a huge Water Cherenkov detector and a high-intensity neutrino beam factory with a neutrino near detector complex. We are constructing the detector and planning to start operation in 2027. The [...] Read more.
The Hyper-Kamiokande is a next-generation neutrinos and nucleon decay experiment. It consists of a huge Water Cherenkov detector and a high-intensity neutrino beam factory with a neutrino near detector complex. We are constructing the detector and planning to start operation in 2027. The photo sensor is one of the key components of the Water Cherenkov detector, and we decided to use large aperture PMTs of 50cm diameter. It is required to prepare suitable digitizer for this particular PMT signal, which has twice as a good performance as those of the current PMTs. They should have sub-ns timing resolution and a wide dynamic range from 𝒪(mV) to 𝒪(V). We have developed three designs using different technologies. The first design processes the input signal in a pipeline of charge-to-time conversion and time-to-digital conversion. The second digitizes the input signal with flash-ADC. The third one uses the discrete components of discriminator and sampling ADC to record the timing and the charge of the input signal. Through a detailed evaluation, we have selected the “discrete design” for our readout system. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>This is a block diagram and a prototype board of the QTC+TDC design. (<b>a</b>) Block diagram; the top half is an overview of the whole design of <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>24</mn><mspace width="3.33333pt"/><mi>ch</mi></mrow></semantics></math> digitizer. Bottom left shows a diagram of QTC-ASIC for single channel input. Bottom right is a schematic of 8-phase TDC implemented in FPGA. (<b>b</b>) 12 ch prototype board. Top half includes TDC and data processor. Bottom half is a prototype board of input circuits and QTC-ASICs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>This is a block diagram of the FADC design and a prototype board. (<b>a</b>) Block diagram of one HKROC for <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>12</mn><mspace width="3.33333pt"/><mi>ch</mi></mrow></semantics></math> inputs. It embeds serial transmitters for digitized data transfer. (<b>b</b>) Prototype of a single HKROC chip and a data processor FPGA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>This is a block diagram and a prototype board of the discrete design. (<b>a</b>) Block diagram of a single channel circuit. It consists of a fast discriminator path for timing measurement and an integrator path for charge measurements. The output of discriminator will be digitized by TDC implemented in FPGA. (<b>b</b>) Prototype board of 24 signal inputs and FPGA system processor.</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 1365 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
T2K Latest Results on Neutrino–Nucleus Cross-Sections
by Andrew Cudd
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008014 - 20 Jul 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 678
Abstract
A detailed understanding of neutrino–nucleus interactions is essential for the precise measurement of neutrino oscillations at long baseline experiments, such as T2K. The T2K near detector complex, designed to constrain the T2K flux and cross-section models, also provides a complementary program of neutrino [...] Read more.
A detailed understanding of neutrino–nucleus interactions is essential for the precise measurement of neutrino oscillations at long baseline experiments, such as T2K. The T2K near detector complex, designed to constrain the T2K flux and cross-section models, also provides a complementary program of neutrino interaction cross-section measurements. Through the use of multiple target materials (carbon, water, lead, iron), and the ability to sample different neutrino spectra (with detectors located on- and off-axis with respect to the beam direction), T2K is able to investigate atomic number and energy dependence of interaction cross-sections in a single experiment. In particular, T2K has recently performed the first joint on-/off-axis measurement of the charged current channel without pion in the final state. Furthermore, dedicated efforts are devoted to investigating rare or poorly studied interaction channels. Indeed, an improved analysis of the coherent pion production cross-section was recently accomplished, including an anti-neutrino sample for the first time. Those results, together with an overview of the T2K measurement strategy, adopted to reduce the model dependence, will be presented in these proceedings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>ND280 and INGRID measured cross-sections in selected forward angle bins as a function of muon momentum with several model comparisons.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Charged current coherent pion selection for neutrino mode as a function of momentum transfer squared and vertex activity with data overlaid. Note that the signal events are concentrated at low <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mo>|</mo><mi>t</mi><mo>|</mo></mrow></semantics></math> and low vertex activity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Charged current coherent pion total cross-section on carbon using <math display="inline"><semantics><msup><mi>A</mi><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>/</mo><mn>3</mn></mrow></msup></semantics></math> scaling for neutrino (<b>left</b>) and anti-neutrino (<b>right</b>) compared to several Monte Carlo predictions using the Rein–Sehgal (RS) and Berger–Sehgal (BS) models.</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 402 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Calibrating for Precision Calorimetry in LArTPCs at ICARUS and SBN
by Gray Putnam
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 15; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008015 - 20 Jul 2023
Viewed by 626
Abstract
The Short-Baseline Neutrino (SBN) Program at Fermilab consists of multiple Liquid Argon Time Projection Chamber (LArTPC) detectors in a single neutrino beam. SBN will have a broad physics program that includes GeV-scale neutrino cross section measurements and physics searches beyond the Standard Model [...] Read more.
The Short-Baseline Neutrino (SBN) Program at Fermilab consists of multiple Liquid Argon Time Projection Chamber (LArTPC) detectors in a single neutrino beam. SBN will have a broad physics program that includes GeV-scale neutrino cross section measurements and physics searches beyond the Standard Model including a search for short-baseline neutrino oscillations. Especially for the oscillation program at SBN (and, looking ahead, at DUNE) it is imperative to have accurate and precise energy measurements that can be related to the true neutrino energy. At ICARUS, we have developed a precise energy scale calibration procedure to match the needs of these physics goals. Two innovations are important here. First, diffusion plays a role in determining the energy scale in LArTPC calibration in a manner unappreciated by previous experiments. Second, incorporating systematic uncertainties into the energy scale calibration fit allows for a precise determination of the uncertainty of calorimetric measurements in a way that could be propogated to higher-level analyses. The result from the calibration procedure outlined herein is now being applied to neutrino beam data at ICARUS. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>Left</b>) Profile of true most probable energy loss (<math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>d</mi><mi>E</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>d</mi><mi>x</mi></mrow></semantics></math>) for through-going cosmic muons as a function of drift time observed in ICARUS for the (biased) 1-wire measurement (<b>top</b>) and the (unbiased) 10-wire measurement (<b>bottom</b>). (<b>Right</b>) Profile of most-probable charge deposited (<math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>d</mi><mi>Q</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>d</mi><mi>x</mi></mrow></semantics></math>) from through-going cosmic muons in in ICARUS data as a function of drift time for the 1-wire and 10-wire measurements. In Monte Carlo, the energy loss of the 1-wire measurement increases with increasing drift time (due to the drift dependent effect of diffusion on wire-sensitive thickness). (The 10-wire measurement obtains a larger <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>d</mi><mi>E</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>d</mi><mi>x</mi></mrow></semantics></math> value (due to the higher wire-sensitive thickness from summing 10 adjacent wires) that is flat across the detector (because the 10-wire spacing dominates over the diffusion length). Correspondingly, in data the most probable value (MPV) of the 1-wire measurement increases relative to the 10-wire measurement with increasing drift time. We use the unbiased 10-wire measurement to extract the electron lifetime in the ICARUS calibration procedure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Example profile of <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>d</mi><mi>Q</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>d</mi><mi>x</mi></mrow></semantics></math> vs. residual range (a proxy for momentum) for cosmic muons in the gain measurement fit. Data are shown for one ICARUS TPC (WE) in two bins of drift time.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>Left</b>) Comparison of calibrated calorimetric energy and range reconstructed energy for cosmic muons, fit to a double Gaussian. (<b>Right</b>) Systematic uncertainty in energy scale calibration with and without applying correlation between gain and recombination (see <a href="#sec3dot2-psf-08-00015" class="html-sec">Section 3.2</a>).</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 953 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Sensitivity to Cabibbo-Suppressed Λ Production in MicroBooNE
by Christopher Thorpe
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 16; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008016 - 20 Jul 2023
Viewed by 647
Abstract
The MicroBooNE detector is a liquid argon time projection chamber (LArTPC) with an 85 ton active mass that receives flux from the Booster Neutrino and the Nutrinos from the Main Injector (NuMI) beams, providing excellent spatial resolution of the reconstructed final-state particles. Since [...] Read more.
The MicroBooNE detector is a liquid argon time projection chamber (LArTPC) with an 85 ton active mass that receives flux from the Booster Neutrino and the Nutrinos from the Main Injector (NuMI) beams, providing excellent spatial resolution of the reconstructed final-state particles. Since 2015, MicroBooNE has accumulated many neutrino and anti-neutrino scattering events with argon nuclei enabling searches for rare interaction channels. The Cabibbo-suppressed production of hyperons in anti-neutrino–nucleus interactions provides sensitivity to a range of effects, including second-class currents, SU(3) symmetry violations and reinteractions between the hyperon and the nuclear remnant. This channel exclusively involves anti-neutrinos, offering an unambiguous constraint on wrong-sign contamination. The effects of nucleon structure and final state interactions are distinct from those affecting the quasielastic channel and modify the Λ and Σ production cross sections in different ways, providing new information that could help to break their degeneracy. Few measurements of this channel have been made, primarily in older experiments such as Gargamelle. We present the sensitivity of the MicroBooNE experiment to the cross section for direct (Cabibbo-suppressed) Λ production in muon anti-neutrino interactions, using anti-neutrinos from the off-axis NuMI beam. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Event display of simulated signal event. The different colors indicate ionization of the argon in the detector, with green/red indicating weaker/stronger ionization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Kinematic variables employed by the selection, with the signal strength multiplied by 20 for visibility. Events with <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>1.09</mn><mo>&lt;</mo><mrow><mi>reconstructed</mi><mo> </mo><mi>invariant</mi><mo> </mo><mi>mas</mi></mrow><mo>&lt;</mo><mn>1.14</mn></mrow></semantics></math> GeV/c and <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>α</mi><mo>&lt;</mo><msup><mn>14</mn><mo>∘</mo></msup></mrow></semantics></math> are selected.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Three stages of the island finding, applied to a signal MC simulation event. The deconvolved wire activity is filtered, removing any pixels below a threshold value. The starting positions of the tracks, mapped into wire-time space coordinates, are used to determine if the proton and pion form a separate island to the muon. (<b>a</b>) Deconvolved wire signals. (<b>b</b>) After application of the threshold filter. (<b>c</b>) After generating islands. The blue region is the muon island, the pink the combined proton/pion island. Green represents unused activity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Bayesian posterior probability distributions of the cross section for different values of <math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>N</mi><mi>obs</mi></msub></semantics></math>, compared with the value predicted by MicroBooNE’s GENIE tune [<a href="#B17-psf-08-00016" class="html-bibr">17</a>].</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 1594 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
LDMX: The Light Dark Matter eXperiment and M3: The Muon Missing Momentum Experiment
by Matthew Solt
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 17; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008017 - 20 Jul 2023
Viewed by 850
Abstract
The constituents of dark matter are still unknown, and the viable possibilities span a very large mass range. The scenario where dark matter originates from thermal contact with familiar matter in the early Universe requires the DM mass to lie within approximately an [...] Read more.
The constituents of dark matter are still unknown, and the viable possibilities span a very large mass range. The scenario where dark matter originates from thermal contact with familiar matter in the early Universe requires the DM mass to lie within approximately an MeV to 100 TeV. Considerable experimental attention has been given to exploring weakly interacting massive particles in the upper end of this range (few GeV–TeV), while the MeV to GeV region has been steadily gaining more attention in recent years. If there is an interaction between light DM and ordinary matter, as there must be in the case of a thermal origin, then there is a production mechanism in accelerator-based experiments. The Light Dark Matter eXperiment (LDMX) is a planned electron-beam fixed-target missing-momentum experiment that has unique sensitivity to light DM in the sub-GeV range. Of particular interest to the NuFact muon working group is a proposal for a muon LDMX that uses a muon beam to probe the electron-phobic scenario. This contribution will provide an overview of the theoretical motivation, the main experimental challenges, how they are addressed, and the projected sensitivities in comparison to other experiments. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>A schematic of the LDMX detector. Mediators, such as dark photons, are produced on a thin tungsten target and decay into invisible particles. These mediators generally carry away most of the beam energy; thus, the only visible final state particle is a soft recoil electron. Measuring significant momentum loss between the initial beam electron and the final recoil electron is a clear sign of the production of invisible particles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The projected sensitivity of the LDMX experiment for Phase I (red) and Phase II (blue), as defined in the text, as well as when using the Ecal as an active target (green). In this figure, <span class="html-italic">y</span> is a dimensionless parameter, <math display="inline"><semantics><mi>ϵ</mi></semantics></math> is the kinetic mixing parameter, <math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>α</mi><mi>d</mi></msub></semantics></math> is the dark photon−dark matter coupling constant, <math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>m</mi><mi>χ</mi></msub></semantics></math> is the mass of the dark matter particle, and <math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>m</mi><msup><mi>A</mi><mo>′</mo></msup></msub></semantics></math> is the mass of the dark photon [<a href="#B9-psf-08-00017" class="html-bibr">9</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The proposed M<math display="inline"><semantics><msup><mrow/><mn>3</mn></msup></semantics></math> detector, which utilizes an LDMX-like apparatus with a muon beam for a missing momentum search. The major difference between the M<math display="inline"><semantics><msup><mrow/><mn>3</mn></msup></semantics></math> and LDMX detectors is the thick active target, as opposed to a thick tungsten target.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The projected sensitivity of M<math display="inline"><semantics><msup><mrow/><mn>3</mn></msup></semantics></math> for the two proposed phases defined in the text for (<b>left</b>) the dark photon model and (<b>right</b>) muon-philic mediators. For the muon-philic model, <math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>m</mi><msup><mi>Z</mi><mo>′</mo></msup></msub></semantics></math> is the mass of the <math display="inline"><semantics><msup><mi>Z</mi><mo>′</mo></msup></semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>g</mi><mrow><mi>D</mi><mi>M</mi></mrow></msub></semantics></math> is the gauge coupling of dark matter to the <math display="inline"><semantics><msup><mi>Z</mi><mo>′</mo></msup></semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">
5 pages, 457 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Coherent Neutrino Scattering and Quenching Factor Measurement
by Jiajun Liao
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 18; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008018 - 21 Jul 2023
Viewed by 762
Abstract
The latest direct measurements of the germanium quenching factor deviate significantly from the standard Lindhard model for nuclear recoil energies at the sub keV region. Here, we show that the recently measured coherent elastic neutrino–nucleus scattering (CEνNS) data from reactor antineutrinos [...] Read more.
The latest direct measurements of the germanium quenching factor deviate significantly from the standard Lindhard model for nuclear recoil energies at the sub keV region. Here, we show that the recently measured coherent elastic neutrino–nucleus scattering (CEνNS) data from reactor antineutrinos can be used to probe the quenching factor model, and a 2σ improvement can be achieved in the fit to the measured CEνNS data if the quenching factor is described by a modified Lindhard model with a negative value of q, which is also consistent with the direct quenching factor measurement. Constraints on the parameter space of a light vector or scalar mediator that couples to neutrinos and quarks, and on a neutrino magnetic moment, are also placed by using the measured CEνNS data, and we find that they are quite sensitive to the quenching factor model at low recoil energies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Left panel: The 1<math display="inline"><semantics><mi>σ</mi></semantics></math>, 90% CL, and <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>2</mn><mi>σ</mi></mrow></semantics></math> allowed regions in the (<span class="html-italic">k</span>, <span class="html-italic">q</span>) plane for the modified quenching factor model. The best fit point is marked by a star. Right panel: <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mo>Δ</mo><msup><mi>χ</mi><mn>2</mn></msup><mo>≡</mo><msup><mi>χ</mi><mn>2</mn></msup><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>q</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo>−</mo><msubsup><mi>χ</mi><mi>min</mi><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow></semantics></math> for a fixed <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>k</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0.157</mn></mrow></semantics></math> [<a href="#B18-psf-08-00018" class="html-bibr">18</a>].</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 1725 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
CEνNS Experiment Proposal at CSNS
by Chenguang Su, Qian Liu and Tianjiao Liang
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 19; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008019 - 24 Jul 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 735
Abstract
The detection and cross-section measurement of Coherent Elastic Neutrino–Nucleus Scattering (CEvNS) are vital for particle physics, astrophysics, and nuclear physics. Therefore, a new CEvNS detection experiment is proposed in China. Undoped CsI crystals, each coupled with two Photon Multiplier Tubes (PMTs), will be [...] Read more.
The detection and cross-section measurement of Coherent Elastic Neutrino–Nucleus Scattering (CEvNS) are vital for particle physics, astrophysics, and nuclear physics. Therefore, a new CEvNS detection experiment is proposed in China. Undoped CsI crystals, each coupled with two Photon Multiplier Tubes (PMTs), will be cooled down to 77 K and placed at the China Spallation Neutron Source (CSNS) to detect the CEvNS signals produced by neutrinos from stopped pion decays occurring within the Tungsten target of CSNS. Owing to the extremely high light yield of pure CsI at 77 K, even though it only has a neutrino flux 60% weaker than the COHERENT experiment, the detectable signal event rate is still expected to be 0.074/day/kg (0.053/day/kg for COHERENT). Low-radioactivity materials and devices will be used to construct the detector, and strong shielding will be applied to reduce the radioactive and neutron background. Dual-PMT readout should be able to reject PMT dark count background. Using all the strategies mentioned above, we hope to reach a 5.1σ signal detection significance within six months of data collection with four 3 kg CsI. This paper will discuss the experiment’s design, as well as the estimation of the signal, various kinds of background, and expected signal sensitivity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Neutrino energy spectra of reactors (<b>red</b>) and spallation neutron source (<b>blue</b>). The energy neutrinos from spallation neutron are significantly higher reactor neutrinos [<a href="#B9-psf-08-00019" class="html-bibr">9</a>,<a href="#B10-psf-08-00019" class="html-bibr">10</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Scene picture of the platform (<b>left</b>) and its relative postion in CSNS (<b>right</b>). The platfrom is <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>8.2</mn></mrow></semantics></math> m right above the Tungsten target.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>A schematic of the detector. The detector contains four sub-detectors in a Dewar filled with liquid nitrogen. Each sub-detector is composed of one 3 kg undoped CsI and two R11065 PMTs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>A schematic of the preliminary shielding structure design. The shielding components from the inside out are as follows. (<b>1</b>) Yellow green: 5 cm OHFC. (<b>2</b>) Gray: Dewar. (<b>3</b>) Yellow: 30 cm HDPE. (<b>4</b>) Green: 60 cm Lead. (<b>5</b>) Red: 5 cm <math display="inline"><semantics><mi>μ</mi></semantics></math> veto plastic scintillator. (<b>6</b>) Blue: 80 cm HDPE.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Efficiency of event selection criteria. <b>Green</b>: Efficiency of <math display="inline"><semantics><mi>μ</mi></semantics></math> veto cut [<a href="#B8-psf-08-00019" class="html-bibr">8</a>]. <b>Blue</b>: Efficiency of afterglow cut [<a href="#B8-psf-08-00019" class="html-bibr">8</a>]. <b>Black</b>: Total Efficiency.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Expected recoiled energy distribution of CE<math display="inline"><semantics><mi>ν</mi></semantics></math>NS interaction detected by a 12 kg cryogenic undoped CsI detector <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>10.5</mn></mrow></semantics></math> m away from the Tungsten target with a half-year of data collection. The contributions from different flavors of neutrinos and different isotopes are also shown.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Expected NPE spectra of CE<math display="inline"><semantics><mi>ν</mi></semantics></math>NS signal. Contributions from different flavors of neutrinos are also shown.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Neutron spectrum measured by a <math display="inline"><semantics><msup><mrow/><mn>3</mn></msup></semantics></math>He multi-sphere neutron spectrometer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The summary of contributions of background from different sources after all cuts applied. PMT dark count background (<b>green</b>) dominates in the low NPE region, while the BRN background (<b>orange</b>) prevails in the high NPE region. The radioactive background (<b>red</b>) contributes a low-flat component, and the environmental background (<b>purple</b>) is too weak to be seen. Four 3 kg undoped CsI sub-detectors are considered.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>PMT dark count spectra with (<b>blue</b>) and without (<b>orange</b>) applying event selection criteria 3. Four couples of PMTs of four sub-detectors are considered. Event selection criteria 3 can suppress this background by three magnitudes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The spectra of energy deposited in CsI from radioactive isotopes in different materials and devices. Four 3 kg undoped CsI sub-detectors are assumed. The background from CsI (<b>blue</b>) dominates, followed by background from stainless steel of the Dewar (<b>purple</b>), PMTs (<b>red</b>) and Copper (<b>orange</b>). The contribution from liquid nitrogen (<b>green</b>) is very small.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The environmental <math display="inline"><semantics><mi>γ</mi></semantics></math> background redraw from the measurement by CDEX collaboration in CJPL [<a href="#B22-psf-08-00019" class="html-bibr">22</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>The expected spectra of CE<math display="inline"><semantics><mi>ν</mi></semantics></math>NS events (<b>dashed red</b>), background events (<b>shadowed gray</b>) and their summation (<b>solid blue</b>) with all event selection criteria applied. Four 3 kg undoped CsI sub-detectors are considered. The first few bins of background and the summation reach out of the y-axis range because the PMT dark count background is very high in this region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>The expected confidence level varying with different detector mass and data-collection time. If a 12 kg CsI detector is employed and collecting data for half an year (180 days), the C.L. can reach <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>5.1</mn><mi>σ</mi></mrow></semantics></math> (the pentagram).</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 1773 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Interdigital H-Mode Drift Tube Linear Accelerator for a Muon Linear Accelerator
by Yuga Nakazawa, Ersin Cicek, Hiroyasu Ego, Yoshinori Fukao, Kenta Futatsukawa, Kazuo Hasegawa, Toru Iijima, Hiromi Iinuma, Kenji Inami, Katsuhiko Ishida, Naritoshi Kawamura, Ryo Kitamura, Yasuhiro Kondo, Tsutomu Mibe, Yasuhiro Miyake, Takatoshi Morishita, Masashi Otani, Naohito Saito, Koichiro Shimomura, Yuki Sue, Kazumichi Sumi, Kazuhito Suzuki, Tomohiro Takayanagi, Yusuke Takeuchi, Junji Tojo, Takayuki Yamazaki, Hiromasa Yasuda and Mai Yotsuzukaadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 20; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008020 - 24 Jul 2023
Viewed by 930
Abstract
The muon anomalous magnetic moment (g2) measurement at the Fermilab National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL-E989) is consistent with a previous experiment at the Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL-E821), and these results show a deviation of 4.2 standard deviations from the prediction [...] Read more.
The muon anomalous magnetic moment (g2) measurement at the Fermilab National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL-E989) is consistent with a previous experiment at the Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL-E821), and these results show a deviation of 4.2 standard deviations from the prediction of the Standard Model. This deviation may suggest the existence of unknown particles, and a completely different approach from previous experiments is needed for further verification. The J-PARC experiment’s objective is to measure the muon g-2 and the electric dipole moment (EDM) with high precision using a new method with a low-emittance muon beam generated by RF linear acceleration. In this paper, the development of an interdigital H-mode drift tube linac (IH-DTL) for the muon linear accelerator is described. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Overview of the muon linac.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Synchronous phase array of the APF method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The mechanical structure of the APF IH-DTL. The drift tubes are monolithically machined on the center plate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The fabricated center plate of the IH-DTL.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Top: the frequency shift along the beam axis by the bead pull method. Bottom: the field error in the on-axis field distribution of the gap area.</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 942 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
IsoDAR@Yemilab—A Definitive Search for Noble Neutrinos and Other BSM Physics
by Daniel Winklehner
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 21; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008021 - 25 Jul 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 822
Abstract
The IsoDAR neutrino source comprises a novel compact cyclotron capable of delivering 10 mA of 60 MeV protons in cw mode and a high-power neutrino production target. It has obtained preliminary approval to run at the new underground facility Yemilab in South Korea. [...] Read more.
The IsoDAR neutrino source comprises a novel compact cyclotron capable of delivering 10 mA of 60 MeV protons in cw mode and a high-power neutrino production target. It has obtained preliminary approval to run at the new underground facility Yemilab in South Korea. IsoDAR will produce a very pure, isotropic ν¯e source, with a peak neutrino energy of around 6 MeV and an endpoint around 15 MeV. Paired with a kton-scale detector like the planned Liquid Scintillator Counter (LSC) at Yemilab, IsoDAR can measure ν¯e disappearance through the inverse beta decay (IBD) channel. We expect about 1.67·106 IBD events and 7000 ν¯e – e elastic scatter events in the LSC in five years of running, letting us distinguish many different models for noble (aka sterile) neutrinos and significantly improving existing limits for Non-Standard Interactions (NSIs). Finally, IsoDAR@Yemilab is sensitive to new particles produced in the target (such as light X bosons that decay to ν¯eνe). We describe the accelerator developments for IsoDAR that enable us to produce about a mole of neutrinos in five years of running. These include direct injection through a radiofrequency quadrupole, exploiting complex beam dynamics, and applying machine learning in accelerator design and optimization. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>CAD model of the Liquid Scintillator Counter (LSC) and IsoDAR areas in the Yemilab facility. From right to left: The cyclotron provides a 10 mA proton beam that is guided through the beamline to the target where <math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mover accent="true"><mi>ν</mi><mo>¯</mo></mover><mi>e</mi></msub></semantics></math> are produced. The LSC counts inverse beta decay (IBD) events. All caverns are excavated (an example can be seen in the photograph).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>From left to right: A 3 + 1, a 3 + 2, and a 3 + 1-with-decay (of the noble neutrino) model. The decay model (right) does not include position and energy smearing expected from the Yemilab detector, while the other two do. The decay time is consistent with recent IceCube results [<a href="#B15-psf-08-00021" class="html-bibr">15</a>]. From [<a href="#B7-psf-08-00021" class="html-bibr">7</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>CAD rendering of an HCHC-60 and the HCHC-01 prototype. The beam is created in the ion source, pre-accelerated and bunched in the RFQ, and injected into the cyclotron through the spiral inflector (see text).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>Left</b>): CAD rendering of the IsoDAR high-power neutrino target. The beam enters from the left and strikes the torpedo with three hemispherical shells (orange). Neutrons flood into the surrounding sleeve (stainless steel vessel, green, filled with a mix of Li and Be) where neutrinos are produced. (<b>Right</b>): Close-up of the shells making up the beam target and temperature distribution in the water (heavy water is pumped through the shells to take away the 600 kW of power). From [<a href="#B2-psf-08-00021" class="html-bibr">2</a>].</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 20277 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Status of the Short-Baseline Near Detector at Fermilab
by Miquel Nebot-Guinot
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 22; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008022 - 25 Jul 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 872
Abstract
The Short-Baseline Near Detector (SBND) will be one of three Liquid Argon Time Projection Chamber (LArTPC) neutrino detectors positioned along the axis of the Booster Neutrino Beam (BNB) at Fermilab, as part of the Short-Baseline Neutrino (SBN) Program. The detector is currently in [...] Read more.
The Short-Baseline Near Detector (SBND) will be one of three Liquid Argon Time Projection Chamber (LArTPC) neutrino detectors positioned along the axis of the Booster Neutrino Beam (BNB) at Fermilab, as part of the Short-Baseline Neutrino (SBN) Program. The detector is currently in the construction phase and is anticipated to begin operation in 2023. SBND is characterized by superb imaging capabilities and will record over a million neutrino interactions per year. Thanks to its unique combination of measurement resolution and statistics, SBND will carry out a rich program of neutrino interaction measurements and novel searches for physics beyond the Standard Model (BSM). It will enable the potential of the overall SBN sterile neutrino program by performing a precise characterization of the unoscillated event rate, and by constraining BNB flux and neutrino–argon cross-section systematic uncertainties. In this proceedings article, the physics reach, current status, and future prospects of SBND are discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Fermilab map showing the locations of the three SBN detectors and the BNB [<a href="#B4-psf-08-00022" class="html-bibr">4</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Number of expected muon (<b>left</b>) and electron (<b>right</b>) neutrinos in SBND during 4 years of data collection, separated by interaction channel (note the different scales).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Picture of the assembled TPC showing the left-hand-side drift volume, with the main components labeled.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Picture of the right-hand-side TPC during the PDS installation, showing one of the PDS modules installed behind the APA.</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 402 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
First Result of the High Repetition Operation in J-PARC MR
by Takaaki Yasui, Susumu Igarashi, Yoichi Sato and Hideaki Hotchi
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 23; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008023 - 26 Jul 2023
Viewed by 693
Abstract
We performed beam studies with a cycling period of 1.36 s in the main ring synchrotron (MR) of Japan Proton Accelerator Research Complex (J-PARC) after hardware upgrade to enable high repetition operation. After optics tuning, we have successfully controlled the beam with an [...] Read more.
We performed beam studies with a cycling period of 1.36 s in the main ring synchrotron (MR) of Japan Proton Accelerator Research Complex (J-PARC) after hardware upgrade to enable high repetition operation. After optics tuning, we have successfully controlled the beam with an intensity of 2.7×1013 protons per bunch, corresponding to a beam power of 740 kW considering the beam survival ratio, during the beam injection period. We have verified the beam optics for the 740 kW FX operation. Split quadrupole families caused three-fold symmetry breaking of the beam optics, resulting in deterioration of the beam survivals. We are planning further beam loss reduction by adding correction quadrupole magnetic fields and recovering the three-fold symmetry. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Beta functions (<b>left</b>) and ratios of measured to model beta functions (<b>right</b>). The blue circles and red triangles denote horizontal and vertical measured results, respectively. The blue and red lines in the left panel show horizontal and vertical model betas, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Fourier spectra of horizontal beam center positions measured every 1 ms at high-dispersion positions. The blue and red lines show the spectra before and after the upgrade, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Beam survival ratio measured by DCCT before (blue) and after (red) adjusting split quadrupole families (<b>left panel</b>), and beam loss counts measured by proportional beam loss monitors during 220 ms (<b>right panel</b>). The beam intensity was <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>2.7</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mn>10</mn><mn>13</mn></msup></mrow></semantics></math> ppb. The horizontal axis of the right panel represents the address assigned based on the positions of the quadrupole magnets. The gains of the proportional beam loss monitors at non-collimator area (violet bars) were 8 times larger than those at collimator area (green bars).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Horizontal (<b>left</b>) and vertical (<b>right</b>) measured phase advances of the three arc sections in the MR before (blue triangles) and after (red circles) adjusting split quadrupole families. The error bars show the rms of 10 data.</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 555 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
A Monitored Neutrino Beam at the European Spallation Source
by Francesco Terranova, F. Acerbi, I. Angelis, L. Bomben, M. Bonesini, F. Bramati, A. Branca, C. Brizzolari, G. Brunetti, S. Capelli, S. Carturan, M. G. Catanesi, S. Cecchini, F. Cindolo, G. Cogo, G. Collazuol, F. Dal Corso, C. Delogu, G. De Rosa, A. Falcone, A. Gola, L. Halić, F. Iacob, C. Jollet, A. Kallitsopoulou, B. Klicek, Y. Kudenko, Ch. Lampoudis, M. Laveder, P. Legou, A. Longhin, L. Ludovici, E. Lutsenko, L. Magaletti, G. Mandrioli, A. Margotti, V. Mascagna, S. Marangoni, N. Mauri, L. Meazza, A. Meregaglia, M. Mezzetto, A. Paoloni, T. Papaevangelou, M. Pari, E. G. Parozzi, L. Pasqualini, G. Paternoster, L. Patrizii, M. Pozzato, M. Prest, F. Pupilli, E. Radicioni, A. C. Ruggeri, D. Sampsonidis, C. Scian, G. Sirri, M. Stipcevic, M. Tenti, M. Torti, S. E. Tzamarias, E. Vallazza and L. Votanoadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008024 - 25 Jul 2023
Viewed by 981
Abstract
Monitored neutrino beams are facilities where beam diagnostics enable the counting and identification of charged leptons in the decay tunnel of a narrow band beam. These facilities can monitor neutrino production at the single particle level (flux precision <1%) and provide [...] Read more.
Monitored neutrino beams are facilities where beam diagnostics enable the counting and identification of charged leptons in the decay tunnel of a narrow band beam. These facilities can monitor neutrino production at the single particle level (flux precision <1%) and provide information about the neutrino energy at the 10% level. The ENUBET Collaboration has demonstrated that lepton monitoring might be achieved not only by employing kaon decays but also by identifying muons from the π+μ+νμ decays and positrons from the decay-in-flight of muons before the hadron dump. As a consequence, beam monitoring can be performed using the ENUBET technique even when the kaon production yield is kinematically suppressed. This finding opens up a wealth of opportunities for measuring neutrino cross-sections below 1 GeV. In this paper, we investigate this opportunity at the European Spallation Source (ESS), which is an ideal facility to measure νμ and νe cross-sections in the 0.2–1 GeV range. We also describe the planned activities for the design of this beam at the ESS within the framework of the ESSνSB+ design study, which was approved by the EU in July 2022. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Layout of the ENUBET monitored neutrino beam at CERN. Protons impinging on the target produce secondaries that are sign- and momentum-selected using a static (i.e., hornless) transfer line. They are steered to the decay tunnel. Particles impinging on the tunnel wall are detected by the instrumentation (segmented calorimeters) installed in the tunnel. Undecayed secondaries are stopped by the hadron dump, while protons that did not interact with the target are stopped by the proton dump.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>View of the ENUBET demonstrator tested at CERN in 2022. The prototype corresponds to a fraction of the instrumented decay tunnel with a curvature radius of 1 m [<a href="#B9-psf-08-00024" class="html-bibr">9</a>]. It comprises a scintillator-based photon veto and a modular calorimeter. The scintillation light produced in the calorimeter and in the veto is brought to the outer part of the detector by means of wavelength-shifting fibers and read out by SiPMs. SiPMs are protected from fast neutrons by a borated plastic shield.</p>
Full article ">
2820 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
JUNO Status and Physics Potential
by Livia Ludhova
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 25; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008025 - 28 Jul 2023
Viewed by 905
Abstract
The Jiangmen Underground Neutrino Observatory (JUNO) is a neutrino experiment under construction in an underground laboratory with a 650 m rock overburden near Jiangmen in southern China. The detector’s main component will be 20 kton of liquid scintillator held in a spherical acrylic [...] Read more.
The Jiangmen Underground Neutrino Observatory (JUNO) is a neutrino experiment under construction in an underground laboratory with a 650 m rock overburden near Jiangmen in southern China. The detector’s main component will be 20 kton of liquid scintillator held in a spherical acrylic vessel. The experiment is designed for the determination of neutrino mass ordering, one of the key open questions in neutrino physics. This measurement will be based on observations of the vacuum oscillation pattern of antineutrinos from two nuclear power plants at a baseline of 53 km. The estimated sensitivity is 3σ in about six years with 26.6 GWth of reactor power. A key ingredient for the success is an excellent and extremely challenging energy resolution of 3% at 1 MeV. The light produced by the scintillator will be seen by 17,612 large twenty-inch PMTs and 25,600 small three-inch PMTs. The OSIRIS detector will monitor the radio purity of the liquid scintillator during the months-long filling process of the main detector. The unoscillated antineutrino spectrum from one reactor core will be measured with unprecedented precision by the Taishan Antineutrino Observatory (TAO), located at a baseline of about 30 m. JUNO is expected to substantially improve the precision of sin22θ12, Δm212, and Δm312 neutrino oscillation parameters. Astrophysical measurements of solar, geo-, supernova, DSNB, and atmospheric neutrinos, as well as searching for proton decay and dark matter, are integral parts of the vast JUNO physics program. This contribution reviews the physics goals and current status of the JUNO project. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p><b>Left:</b> The Jiangmen Underground Observatory (JUNO) is located in Guangdong province, South China. The locations of the Yangjiang and Taishan nuclear power plants (NPPs) are shown as well. <b>Right:</b> the expected JUNO reactor antineutrino energy spectrum after 2000 days of data taking in scenarios assuming no oscillations (solid black), oscillations under normal ordering (solid blue), and oscillations under inverted ordering (solid red). Features that depend on the four oscillation parameters are highlighted. From [<a href="#B2-psf-08-00025" class="html-bibr">2</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p><b>Left:</b> sketch of the JUNO detector indicating the main subsystems. From [<a href="#B1-psf-08-00025" class="html-bibr">1</a>]. <b>Right:</b> support structure of the central detector and the installation platform with workers (photo from June 2022).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Sensitivity of JUNO. <b>Left:</b> sensitivity for determining neutrino mass ordering by exploiting the reference reactor spectrum of TAO. <b>Right:</b> sensitivity for precisely measuring neutrino oscillation parameters [<a href="#B2-psf-08-00025" class="html-bibr">2</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The energy spectra of <math display="inline"><semantics> <msup> <mrow/> <mn>8</mn> </msup> </semantics></math>B solar neutrino signal and background components expected via measurement exploiting elastic scattering (ES) from electrons as well as CC and NC interactions on <math display="inline"><semantics> <msup> <mrow/> <mn>13</mn> </msup> </semantics></math>C [<a href="#B14-psf-08-00025" class="html-bibr">14</a>]. <b>Left:</b> plot representing the channel of single events. <b>Right:</b> plot representing the prompt signal of the delayed coincidence event characteristic for the CC interaction on <math display="inline"><semantics> <msup> <mrow/> <mn>13</mn> </msup> </semantics></math>C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p><b>Left:</b> various radiopurity scenarios considered in the JUNO solar neutrino sensitivity study compared to the expected energy spectra of <math display="inline"><semantics> <msup> <mrow/> <mn>7</mn> </msup> </semantics></math>Be, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msup> <mrow/> <mn>13</mn> </msup> </semantics></math>N, and <math display="inline"><semantics> <msup> <mrow/> <mn>15</mn> </msup> </semantics></math>O solar neutrinos for one year of statistics. A subtraction of the cosmogenic <math display="inline"><semantics> <msup> <mrow/> <mn>11</mn> </msup> </semantics></math>C background with the Three-Fold-Coincidence technique is assumed. The top scale is in the number of photoelectrons (p.e.). <b>Right:</b> expected IBD-like spectrum of JUNO for one year of statistics [<a href="#B10-psf-08-00025" class="html-bibr">10</a>]. The respective contributions of geoneutrinos, reactor antineutrinos, accidental background, and cosmogenic <math display="inline"><semantics> <msup> <mrow/> <mn>9</mn> </msup> </semantics></math>Li-<math display="inline"><semantics> <msup> <mrow/> <mn>8</mn> </msup> </semantics></math>He background are shown in red, yellow, blue, and green, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p><b>Left:</b> Comparison of model predictions (coloured bands) and existing experimental 90% confidence level upper limits (coloured markers) for the DSNB signal. The estimated sensitivity of JUNO (black markers) reaches the level of current model predictions. From [<a href="#B24-psf-08-00025" class="html-bibr">24</a>]. <b>Right:</b> JUNO’s expected reconstruction of the energy spectra of atmospheric neutrinos of <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>ν</mi> <mi>μ</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> (blue) and <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>ν</mi> <mi>e</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> (red) flavour [<a href="#B25-psf-08-00025" class="html-bibr">25</a>] with five years of data as compared with existing measurements in the same energy region. The fluxes are multiplied by <math display="inline"><semantics> <msup> <mi>E</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </semantics></math> for graphical reasons. From [<a href="#B1-psf-08-00025" class="html-bibr">1</a>].</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 511 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Searches for Dark Matter in the Sun with the IceCube Neutrino Telescope
by Christoph Tönnis
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 26; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008026 - 31 Jul 2023
Viewed by 744
Abstract
The IceCube detector is particularly sensitive to high-energy neutrinos due to its size and photosensor spacing. In this review we present results from the search for dark matter in the sun and earth, including a search for dark matter that annihilates into a [...] Read more.
The IceCube detector is particularly sensitive to high-energy neutrinos due to its size and photosensor spacing. In this review we present results from the search for dark matter in the sun and earth, including a search for dark matter that annihilates into a metastable mediator that subsequently decays into standard model particles and a search for solar atmospheric neutrinos that present a significant background to solar dark matter searches. We present the results from different searches for dark matter in the sun and the earth in this proceeding paper. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Sensitivities at a 90% confidence level [<a href="#B11-psf-08-00026" class="html-bibr">11</a>] compared to the latest results from ANTARES [<a href="#B12-psf-08-00026" class="html-bibr">12</a>] and SuperKamiokande [<a href="#B13-psf-08-00026" class="html-bibr">13</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Differential sensitivity for a power-law flux with <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>3.0</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> [<a href="#B16-psf-08-00026" class="html-bibr">16</a>]. Bins contributing to the 90% central sensitivity range have solid lines. Results from HAWC [<a href="#B18-psf-08-00026" class="html-bibr">18</a>] and FERMI-LAT [<a href="#B15-psf-08-00026" class="html-bibr">15</a>] are also shown.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The sensitivities of the most recent searches for DM in the sun with five and nine years of data [<a href="#B19-psf-08-00026" class="html-bibr">19</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The limits on the spin-dependent DM–nucleon scattering in comparison [<a href="#B25-psf-08-00026" class="html-bibr">25</a>] with other experiments [<a href="#B18-psf-08-00026" class="html-bibr">18</a>,<a href="#B26-psf-08-00026" class="html-bibr">26</a>,<a href="#B27-psf-08-00026" class="html-bibr">27</a>]. The results for the <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msup> <mi>τ</mi> <mo>+</mo> </msup> <msup> <mi>τ</mi> <mo>−</mo> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math> channel are shown in comparison with other experiments. In this plot a mediator mass of 100 GeV and a mediator decay length of one solar radius was assumed.</p>
Full article ">
5 pages, 299 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Charged-Meson-Induced New Physics in Beam-Focused Neutrino Experiments
by Doojin Kim
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 27; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008027 - 31 Jul 2023
Viewed by 667
Abstract
We discuss the phenomenology of dark-sector signals coming not only from the conventionally-used neutral meson decays but also from recently-realized charged-meson decays. We argue that charged mesons can be overlooked even though there are efficient sources of dark-sector particles. Two applications are presented: [...] Read more.
We discuss the phenomenology of dark-sector signals coming not only from the conventionally-used neutral meson decays but also from recently-realized charged-meson decays. We argue that charged mesons can be overlooked even though there are efficient sources of dark-sector particles. Two applications are presented: a dark-sector interpretation of the MiniBooNE excess and an anomalous appearance of ντ in the near detector of beam-focused neutrino experiments. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>An example fit to the MiniBooNE excess. The dark yellow (dark blue) histograms describe the combination of all known backgrounds (the signal events from our vector-portal dark-matter scenario). The black dots are the latest MiniBooNE measurement data along with their statistical uncertainty. See the text for more details.</p>
Full article ">
10 pages, 1460 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Muons: A Gateway to New Physics
by Jonathan Kriewald
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 28; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008028 - 1 Aug 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 757
Abstract
The discovery of neutrino oscillations is the first laboratory evidence of New Physics beyond the Standard Model. Oscillating neutrinos necessarily imply that neutrinos are massive and that (neutral) lepton flavour is violated. However, a signal of charged lepton flavour violation (cLFV) has so [...] Read more.
The discovery of neutrino oscillations is the first laboratory evidence of New Physics beyond the Standard Model. Oscillating neutrinos necessarily imply that neutrinos are massive and that (neutral) lepton flavour is violated. However, a signal of charged lepton flavour violation (cLFV) has so far eluded experimental discovery. In this proceeding, we review some phenomenological implications of the current experimental bounds (and future sensitivities) on observables related to muons, with particular attention to charged lepton flavour violating processes. In connection to neutrino masses, we also highlight some phenomenological implications of leptonic CP violation on cLFV observables. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>New Physics scales to be indirectly probed by the indicated observables. The darkened areas are the “naïve” New Physics scales, by assuming the Wilson coefficients of order one, the coloured bars indicate the inherent New Physics scales assuming weak interaction strengths, and the hatched areas account for loop suppression due to higher-order effects. Figure taken from ref. [<a href="#B37-psf-08-00028" class="html-bibr">37</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p><b>Left</b> Correlation of <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>μ</mi><mo>−</mo><mi>e</mi></mrow></semantics></math> cLFV observables, for varying values of the CPV Dirac and Majorana phases: vanishing values (blue), non-vanishing (orange), and “special grid” (green); see the description in the text. <b>Right</b> BR<math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>Z</mi><mo>→</mo><msup><mi>μ</mi><mo>±</mo></msup><msup><mi>τ</mi><mo>∓</mo></msup><mo>)</mo></mrow></semantics></math> vs. BR<math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>τ</mi><mo>→</mo><mi>μ</mi><mi>μ</mi><mi>μ</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></semantics></math>. The olive-green, cyan, and purple points denote an associated CP asymmetry <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mrow><mo>|</mo></mrow><msub><mi mathvariant="script">A</mi><mrow><mi>C</mi><mi>P</mi></mrow></msub><mrow><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>Z</mi><mo>→</mo><mi>μ</mi><mi>τ</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo>|</mo><mo>≥</mo></mrow></mrow></semantics></math> 10%, 20% and 30%, respectively, while the orange points denote CP asymmetries ≤ 10%. From [<a href="#B42-psf-08-00028" class="html-bibr">42</a>,<a href="#B43-psf-08-00028" class="html-bibr">43</a>].</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 334 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Total Neutron Cross-Section Measurement on CH with a Novel 3D-Projection Scintillator Detector
by Ciro Riccio, Anushka Agarwal, Howard Budd, Jordi Capó, Pooi Chong, Georgios Christodoulou, Mikhail Danilov, Anna Dergacheva, Albert De Roeck, Neha Dokania, Dana Douqa, Katherine Dugas, Sergei Fedotov, Sunwoo Gwon, Ryan Howell, Konosuke Iwamoto, Cesar Jesú-Valls, Chang Kee Jung, Siva Prasad Kasetti, Marat Khabibullin, Alexey Khotjantsev, Tatsuya Kikawa, Umut Kose, Yuri Kudenko, Soichiro Kuribayashi, Thomas Kutter, David Last, Shih-Kai Lin, Thorsten Lux, Steven Manly, David A. Martinez Caicedo, Sergei Martynenko, Tsunayuki Matsubara, Christopher Mauger, Kevin McFarland, Clark McGrew, Aleksandr Mefodiev, Oleg Mineev, Takeshi Nakadaira, Etam Noah, Andrew Olivier, Vittorio Paolone, Sandro Palestini, Alexander Paul-Torres, Rachel Pellegrino, Manuel Alejandro Ramírez, Jairo Rodriguez Rondon, Federico Sanchez, Davide Sgalaberna, Wilf Shorrock, Andriaseta Sitraka, Kim Siyeon, Nataliya Skrobova, Sergey Suvorov, Abraham Teklu, Martin Tzanov, Yoshi Uchida, Clarence Wret, Guang Yang, Nikolay Yershov, Masashi Yokoyama and Perri Zilbermanadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 29; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008029 - 1 Aug 2023
Viewed by 822
Abstract
Long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments rely on detailed models of neutrino interactions on nuclei. These models constitute an important source of systematic uncertainty, partially because detectors to date have been unable to detect final state neutrons. A novel three-dimensional projection scintillator tracker will be [...] Read more.
Long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments rely on detailed models of neutrino interactions on nuclei. These models constitute an important source of systematic uncertainty, partially because detectors to date have been unable to detect final state neutrons. A novel three-dimensional projection scintillator tracker will be a component of the upgraded off-axis near detector of the T2K experiment. Due to the good timing resolution and fine granularity, this technology is capable of measuring neutron kinematics in neutrino interactions on an event-by-event basis and will provide valuable data for refining neutrino interaction models. A prototype is exposed to the neutron beamline at Los Alamos National Laboratory with neutron energies between 0 and 800 MeV. In order to demonstrate the capability to measure neutron kinematics, the total neutron–scintillator cross section as a function of the neutron kinetic energy is measured. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Representation of a muon antineutrino interaction producing a positively charged muon and a neutron at time <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>t</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </semantics></math>. The neutron then interacts with a nucleus of the detector material and produces a proton and another neutron at time <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>t</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </semantics></math>. The ToF is given by the difference in time between the two interactions, and the distance (d) is the lever arm. Each square represents a single scintillator cube, and the lines represent true particle trajectories. This figures was adapted from Ref. [<a href="#B2-psf-08-00029" class="html-bibr">2</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>Left</b>) total neutron cross section as a function of the kinetic energy. Black error bars represent the total uncertainty and red bars the statistical uncertainty. The cross section is compared with reconstructed <span class="html-small-caps">Geant4</span> prediction obtained using the <span class="html-small-caps">QGSP_BERT</span> physics list (blue dotted line). (<b>Right</b>) Relative uncertainty on the neutron cross section as a function of the kinetic energy. Different colors correspond to different sources of uncertainty.</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 1845 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Searching for Charged Lepton Flavour Violation with Mu3e
by Ann-Kathrin Perrevoort
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 30; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008030 - 2 Aug 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 752
Abstract
The observation of lepton flavour violation (LFV) in the charged lepton sector would be an unambiguous sign of physics beyond the Standard Model (BSM), and thus, it is the channel of choice for many BSM searches. LFV searches in muon decays in particular [...] Read more.
The observation of lepton flavour violation (LFV) in the charged lepton sector would be an unambiguous sign of physics beyond the Standard Model (BSM), and thus, it is the channel of choice for many BSM searches. LFV searches in muon decays in particular benefit from the fact that muons can be easily produced at high rates. There is a global effort to search for LFV at high-intensity muon sources to which the upcoming Mu3e experiment at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI) will contribute. The Mu3e Collaboration aims to perform a background-free search for the LFV decay μ+e+ee+ with an unprecedented sensitivity in the order of 10−15 in the first phase of operation and 10−16 in the final phase—an improvement over the preceding SINDRUM experiment by four orders of magnitude. The high muon stopping rates and low momenta of the decay electrons make high demands on momentum and time resolution and on the data acquisition. The innovative experimental concept is based on a tracking detector built from novel ultra-thin silicon pixel sensors and scintillating fibres and tiles as well as online event reconstruction and filtering in real time. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Feynman diagrams of the <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msup><mi>μ</mi><mo>+</mo></msup><mo>→</mo><msup><mi>e</mi><mo>+</mo></msup><msup><mi>e</mi><mo>−</mo></msup><msup><mi>e</mi><mo>+</mo></msup></mrow></semantics></math> decay mediated via (<b>left</b>) neutrino mixing, (<b>centre</b>) supersymmetric particles, and (<b>right</b>) a <math display="inline"><semantics><msup><mi>Z</mi><mo>′</mo></msup></semantics></math> in models with an extended electroweak sector.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic of the Mu3e phase I detector shown (<b>left</b>) along the beam axis and (<b>right</b>) transverse to the beam axis. A potential <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msup><mi>μ</mi><mo>+</mo></msup><mo>→</mo><msup><mi>e</mi><mo>+</mo></msup><msup><mi>e</mi><mo>−</mo></msup><msup><mi>e</mi><mo>+</mo></msup></mrow></semantics></math> signal decay is shown with <math display="inline"><semantics><msup><mi>e</mi><mo>+</mo></msup></semantics></math> trajectories in red and the <math display="inline"><semantics><msup><mi>e</mi><mo>−</mo></msup></semantics></math> trajectory in blue.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Simulation studies of the phase I Mu3e experiment. (<b>Left</b>) Distribution of simulated signal and background events. (<b>Right</b>) Expected sensitivity of the <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msup><mi>μ</mi><mo>+</mo></msup><mo>→</mo><msup><mi>e</mi><mo>+</mo></msup><msup><mi>e</mi><mo>−</mo></msup><msup><mi>e</mi><mo>+</mo></msup></mrow></semantics></math> search in phase I.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Dalitz plots of the invariant mass of <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msup><mi>e</mi><mo>+</mo></msup><msup><mi>e</mi><mo>−</mo></msup></mrow></semantics></math> pairs in simulated and reconstructed <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msup><mi>μ</mi><mo>+</mo></msup><mo>→</mo><msup><mi>e</mi><mo>+</mo></msup><msup><mi>e</mi><mo>−</mo></msup><msup><mi>e</mi><mo>+</mo></msup></mrow></semantics></math> signal decays in the phase I Mu3e experiment assuming (<b>left</b>) phase-space distributed decays, (<b>centre</b>) an effective dipole interaction, and (<b>right</b>) an effective four-fermion interaction. The effective Lagrangian from [<a href="#B7-psf-08-00030" class="html-bibr">7</a>] has been deployed in this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Sensitivity of the Mu3e phase I experiment to certain BSM models. (<b>Left</b>) Reach of a search for <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msup><mi>μ</mi><mo>+</mo></msup><mo>→</mo><msup><mi>e</mi><mo>+</mo></msup><mi>a</mi></mrow></semantics></math> with subsequent <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>a</mi><mo>→</mo><msup><mi>e</mi><mo>+</mo></msup><msup><mi>e</mi><mo>−</mo></msup></mrow></semantics></math> decay in the parameter space of an axion-like <span class="html-italic">a</span> as presented in [<a href="#B6-psf-08-00030" class="html-bibr">6</a>]. (<b>Centre</b>) Reach of a search for promptly decaying dark photons emitted in muon decays. Lagrangian taken from [<a href="#B10-psf-08-00030" class="html-bibr">10</a>]. Plot adapted from [<a href="#B11-psf-08-00030" class="html-bibr">11</a>]. (<b>Right</b>) Sensitivity of Mu3e phase I to the branching ratio of <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msup><mi>μ</mi><mo>+</mo></msup><mo>→</mo><msup><mi>e</mi><mo>+</mo></msup><mi>X</mi></mrow></semantics></math> compared to the current strongest limits set by TWIST [<a href="#B9-psf-08-00030" class="html-bibr">9</a>]. If the calibration of the total momentum scale is performed with the Michel spectrum, the sensitivity deteriorates at low <math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>m</mi><mi>X</mi></msub></semantics></math> (sim. calib.). Alternative calibrations are currently under investigation (ext. calib.).</p>
Full article ">
5 pages, 710 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Calibration Strategy for the JUNO Experiment
by Davide Basilico
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 31; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008031 - 1 Aug 2023
Viewed by 760
Abstract
Jiangmen Underground Neutrino Observatory (JUNO) is a 20 kton liquid scintillator-based neutrino experiment, being built in the Guangdong province in Southern China. JUNO will act as a multipurpose observatory for neutrinos produced by artificial and natural sources. The detector calibration is a crucial [...] Read more.
Jiangmen Underground Neutrino Observatory (JUNO) is a 20 kton liquid scintillator-based neutrino experiment, being built in the Guangdong province in Southern China. JUNO will act as a multipurpose observatory for neutrinos produced by artificial and natural sources. The detector calibration is a crucial and challenging tile for the success of the JUNO rich physics programme; its strategy is based on the periodical deployment of radioactive sources within the liquid scintillator. The hardware design consists of several independent and low-background subsystems able to deploy the sources in multiple positions, to optimize the energy resolution and to provide a detailed assessment of the detector energy response. By exploiting this comprehensive calibration program, along with a dual calorimetry technique based on two independent photosensor systems, the JUNO central detector will be able to achieve a better than 1% energy linearity and a 3% effective energy resolution, which are crucial requirements for the neutrino mass ordering determination. In the following, the JUNO calibration strategy and requirements, along with the system hardware design and the simulation results, will be outlined. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Overview of the calibration system: the Automatic Calibration Unit (ACU), two Cable Loop Systems (CLSs), the Guide Tube (GT), and the Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The non–uniformity function <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>g</mi><mo>(</mo><mi>r</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>θ</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></semantics></math> in <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>φ</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn></mrow></semantics></math> plane as a function of <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mo form="prefix">cos</mo><mi>θ</mi></mrow></semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics><msup><mi>R</mi><mn>3</mn></msup></semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Physics non-linearity determination: <math display="inline"><semantics><mi>γ</mi></semantics></math> sources (<b>left panel</b>) and <math display="inline"><semantics><msup><mrow/><mn>12</mn></msup></semantics></math>B spectral (<b>right panel</b>) fit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Instrumental non-linearity, defined as the ratio of the total measured LPMT charge to the true charge for events uniformly distributed in the detector.</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 1321 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Online Machine-Learning-Based Event Selection for COMET Phase-I
by Yuki Fujii, Masaki Miyataki, MyeongJae Lee, Yu Nakazawa, Liam Pinchbeck, Kazuki Ueno and Hisataka Yoshida
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 32; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008032 - 3 Aug 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1076
Abstract
In many modern particle physics experiments, high-rate data handling is one of the most critical challenges due to the increase in particle intensity required to achieve higher statistics. We will tackle the challenge in the COMET experiment by developing the sub-microseconds ultra-fast machine [...] Read more.
In many modern particle physics experiments, high-rate data handling is one of the most critical challenges due to the increase in particle intensity required to achieve higher statistics. We will tackle the challenge in the COMET experiment by developing the sub-microseconds ultra-fast machine learning (ML) algorithm implemented inside FPGAs to search for the lepton flavour violation process, a μ-e conversion, using the world’s most intense muon beam. Our previous study showed that a trigger algorithm based on a gradient-boosted decision tree will realise the sufficient trigger performance within 3.2 μs with a cut-based event classification. In this paper, we further investigated neural network algorithms as event classifications. For the feasibility test, a multi-layer perceptron (MLP) model was implemented inside the FPGA, and the preliminary results are presented. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Alternating cross-section view of the CyDet in COMET Phase-I (<b>left</b>) and an event display with a signal electron trajectory and background hits in X-Y cross-section view in CyDet (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>An illustration describing the structure of the trigger system, including the central trigger system, called FC7 [<a href="#B5-psf-08-00032" class="html-bibr">5</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Examples of pseudo-signal + BG (<b>left</b>) and random BG-only (<b>right</b>) data prepared for this study. Original data before compression consist of 1-bit, 60 × 16 pixels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Comparisons of the QMLP signal classifier performance implemented inside the FPGA. (<b>a</b>) Score comparison. (<b>b</b>) ROC curve comparison.</p>
Full article ">
4 pages, 514 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Measurement of Double-Differential Cross-Sections for Mesonless Charged Current Neutrino Scattering on Argon with MicroBooNE
by Julia Book
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 33; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008033 - 8 Aug 2023
Viewed by 768
Abstract
The MicroBooNE liquid argon time projection chamber experiment is pursuing a broad range of neutrino physics measurements, including some of the first high-statistics results for neutrino–argon scattering cross-sections. At the neutrino energies relevant for MicroBooNE and its companion experiments in the Fermilab Short-Baseline [...] Read more.
The MicroBooNE liquid argon time projection chamber experiment is pursuing a broad range of neutrino physics measurements, including some of the first high-statistics results for neutrino–argon scattering cross-sections. At the neutrino energies relevant for MicroBooNE and its companion experiments in the Fermilab Short-Baseline Neutrino program, the dominant event topology involves mesonless final states containing one or more protons. A complete description of these events requires modeling the contributions of quasielastic and two-particle, two-hole neutrino interactions, as well as more inelastic reaction modes in which final state pions are reabsorbed by the residual nucleus. Refinements to the current understanding of these processes, informed by new neutrino cross-section data, will enable a precise and reliable interpretation of future measurements of neutrino oscillations and searches for exotic physics processes involving neutrinos. This proceeding presents the first double-differential cross-section results from MicroBooNE for mesonless charged current scattering of muon neutrinos on argon. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Neutrino cross-section as a function of energy [<a href="#B5-psf-08-00033" class="html-bibr">5</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic illustration of the transverse variables used in this work [<a href="#B3-psf-08-00033" class="html-bibr">3</a>]. The neutrino travels in the z direction, where the x–y plane is the plane of the page.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The single-differential <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>C</mi><mi>C</mi><mn>0</mn><mi>π</mi><mi>N</mi><mi>p</mi></mrow></semantics></math> event rate in terms of the reconstructed muon momentum <math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>p</mi><mi>μ</mi></msub></semantics></math> [<a href="#B4-psf-08-00033" class="html-bibr">4</a>]. This event rate is obtained by integrating the 2D event distribution (in terms of <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msub><mi>p</mi><mi>μ</mi></msub><mo>,</mo><mo form="prefix">cos</mo><msub><mi>θ</mi><mi>μ</mi></msub></mrow></semantics></math>) over all angles. The dashed lines indicate the total uncertainty in the GENIE Monte Carlo prediction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p><math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>C</mi><mi>C</mi><mn>1</mn><mi>p</mi><mn>0</mn><mi>π</mi></mrow></semantics></math> cross-sections as a function of (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>δ</mi><msub><mi>p</mi><mi>T</mi></msub></msub></semantics></math> for all events, and separated by (<b>b</b>) low (less than 45 degrees) and (<b>c</b>) high (above 135 degrees) <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>δ</mi><msub><mi>α</mi><mi>T</mi></msub></mrow></semantics></math>. We thereby present (<b>a</b>) single- and (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>) double-differential cross-section measurements. The black points indicate data, while the gray bands show normalized systematic uncertainty. The inner error bars show statistical uncertainty only, while the outer error bars show the combined total (statistical and shape) uncertainty. The colored lines compare the predictions of GiBUU (orange) and GENIE (G18, blue) event generators with and without FSIs [<a href="#B2-psf-08-00033" class="html-bibr">2</a>].</p>
Full article ">
5 pages, 908 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
ESSνSB from Source to Target and Plans for the Future
by Natalia Milas and Maja Olvegård
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 34; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008034 - 9 Aug 2023
Viewed by 634
Abstract
The European Spallation Source (ESS) will be the most powerful neutron source in the world. This facility offers a unique opportunity to study fundamental physics, in particular the matter–antimatter asymmetry in the Universe due to the development of a very intense neutrino superbeam. [...] Read more.
The European Spallation Source (ESS) will be the most powerful neutron source in the world. This facility offers a unique opportunity to study fundamental physics, in particular the matter–antimatter asymmetry in the Universe due to the development of a very intense neutrino superbeam. The ESS neutrino Super-Beam project proposes an accelerator complex, complimentary to the existing facility, and an additional target station to produce such a neutrino beam. We give an overview of the ESSνSB project with details on the accelerator complex, from source to target. We also present the proposed next steps for the ESSνSB project. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic layout of the required ESS upgrades. The ESS linear accelerator is shown in black, the transfer line from the linac to the accumulator ring is shown in blue, the accumulator ring and the switch yard are shown in black, the target station is shown in green, and the near detector site is shown in magenta. (Units in mm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The layout of the upgraded linac.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Accumulator ring layout.</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 1607 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Neutrino Oscillation Measurements with KM3NeT/ORCA
by Johannes Schumann
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 35; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008035 - 9 Aug 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 889
Abstract
KM3NeT/ORCA is an underwater neutrino telescope which is currently being deployed in the Mediterranean Sea. Its geometry has been optimized for the study of neutrino oscillations using atmospheric neutrinos (within an energy range of 1–100 GeV). In particular, this will allow to [...] Read more.
KM3NeT/ORCA is an underwater neutrino telescope which is currently being deployed in the Mediterranean Sea. Its geometry has been optimized for the study of neutrino oscillations using atmospheric neutrinos (within an energy range of 1–100 GeV). In particular, this will allow to measure the neutrino mass hierarchy as well as the oscillation parameters θ23 and Δm312. The data from the ORCA detector with a six string configuration and one year of exposure has already allowed to exclude the non-oscillation hypothesis with more than 5σ. In this contribution an overview of current results will be presented and the sensitivity of a fully deployed ORCA detector will be discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Measured oscillation parameters <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msup><mo form="prefix">sin</mo><mn>2</mn></msup><msub><mi>θ</mi><mn>23</mn></msub></mrow></semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mo>Δ</mo><msubsup><mi>m</mi><mn>31</mn><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow></semantics></math> with an ORCA6 livetime of 355 days (black) and the expected sensitivity at 90% CL for the increased livetime of 540 days and refined analysis (red). Taken from [<a href="#B3-psf-08-00035" class="html-bibr">3</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Estimated neutrino mass hierarchy sensitivity for a normal and inverted hierarchy of ORCA115 over the atmospheric mixing angle <math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>θ</mi><mn>23</mn></msub></semantics></math> for three years of livetime (<b>left</b>) and over the data collection period for fixed <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msub><mi>θ</mi><mn>23</mn></msub><mo>=</mo><msup><mn>48</mn><mo>∘</mo></msup></mrow></semantics></math> (<b>right</b>). Taken from [<a href="#B2-psf-08-00035" class="html-bibr">2</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Estimated neutrino mass hierarchy sensitivity for a normal (<b>left</b>) and inverted hierarchy (<b>right</b>) of ORCA115, JUNO, and both in a combined study. Taken from [<a href="#B8-psf-08-00035" class="html-bibr">8</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Plot of <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mo>Δ</mo><msup><mi>χ</mi><mn>2</mn></msup></mrow></semantics></math> over the parameters <math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>ε</mi><mrow><mi>μ</mi><mi>τ</mi></mrow></msub></semantics></math> with a 90% confidence level for ORCA in the six DU configuration, ANTARES [<a href="#B11-psf-08-00035" class="html-bibr">11</a>] and IceCube [<a href="#B12-psf-08-00035" class="html-bibr">12</a>,<a href="#B13-psf-08-00035" class="html-bibr">13</a>] (<b>left</b>); the list of optimised parameters of the ORCA6 result including their fitted values and Gaussian prior width (<b>right</b>).Taken from [<a href="#B14-psf-08-00035" class="html-bibr">14</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The mixing angle sensitivity estimate 99% confidence level for a fourth sterile neutrino at <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mo>Δ</mo><msubsup><mi>m</mi><mrow><mn>41</mn></mrow><mn>2</mn></msubsup><mo>=</mo><mn>1</mn><mo> </mo><msup><mrow><mi>eV</mi></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup></mrow></semantics></math> for ORCA115, ANTARES [<a href="#B11-psf-08-00035" class="html-bibr">11</a>], IceCube(DeepCore) [<a href="#B15-psf-08-00035" class="html-bibr">15</a>] and Super-Kamiokande [<a href="#B16-psf-08-00035" class="html-bibr">16</a>]. Taken from [<a href="#B10-psf-08-00035" class="html-bibr">10</a>].</p>
Full article ">
5 pages, 537 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
ESS Linac Overall Status and Normal-Conducting Linac Commissioning
by Ryoichi Miyamoto, Mamad Eshraqi, Yngve Levinsen, Natalia Milas and Daniel Noll
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 36; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008036 - 9 Aug 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 714
Abstract
The European Spallation Source (ESS), currently under construction in Lund, Sweden, will be the brightest spallation neutron source in the world, when its driving superconducting proton linac achieves the design power of 5 MW at 2 GeV. Such a high-power linac requires production, [...] Read more.
The European Spallation Source (ESS), currently under construction in Lund, Sweden, will be the brightest spallation neutron source in the world, when its driving superconducting proton linac achieves the design power of 5 MW at 2 GeV. Such a high-power linac requires production, efficient acceleration, and almost no-loss transport of a high-current beam (62.5 mA), thus making its design and beam commissioning challenging. Beam commissioning for the normal-conducting part of the linac is ongoing in stages. In 2022, the beam was accelerated up to the first tank of the five-tank drift-tube linac. This presentation provides a summary of the ESS linac project and presents highlights from ongoing beam commissioning. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>ESS linac schematic layout during the initial 2 MW Ops. The segments in the DTL and SC sections denote DTL tanks or cryomodules. The cryomodules in gray will not be powered during the initial Ops, making the beam energy and power 800 MeV and 2 MW for each.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>RFQ transmission vs. LEBT solenoids. <b>Left</b>: Measurement. <b>Middle</b>: simulations with a 95% SCC. <b>Right</b>: Simulation with 100% SCC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p><b>Left</b>: DTL1 transmission vs. phase. <b>Right</b>: FWHM vs. amplitude. The model predicts a 110 degrees FWHM for the design 3.05 MV/m amplitude, indicating the set field being off by −5%.</p>
Full article ">
5 pages, 785 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
A Demonstrator for Muon Ionisation Cooling
by Chris Rogers
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 37; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008037 - 11 Aug 2023
Viewed by 901
Abstract
The muon collider is an excellent prospect as a multi-TeV lepton collider, with the possibility for high luminosity and reaching 10 TeV or more. In order to realise such luminosity, high beam brightness is required. Ionisation cooling, which was demonstrated recently by the [...] Read more.
The muon collider is an excellent prospect as a multi-TeV lepton collider, with the possibility for high luminosity and reaching 10 TeV or more. In order to realise such luminosity, high beam brightness is required. Ionisation cooling, which was demonstrated recently by the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE), is the technique proposed to realise sufficient brightness. MICE demonstrated transverse emittance reduction of incident beams having relatively high emittance and without beam reacceleration. The international Muon Collider Collaboration proposes a Demonstrator for Muon Cooling that will demonstrate six-dimensional emittance reduction over a number of cooling cells, operating at beam emittance close to the ultimate goal for the muon collider. Together with a full R&D programme, this will pave the way for the construction of a muon collider. In this paper, initial considerations and possible implementations for the Demonstrator are discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Conceptual design of the Demonstrator for Muon Cooling.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The beam following collimation. (<b>Top left</b>) Longitudinal phase space of all buckets; (<b>top right</b>) longitudinal phase space of a single bucket; (<b>bottom left</b>) horizontal phase space; (<b>bottom right</b>) vertical phase space.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>Left</b>) Transverse beam optics of the system for different momenta. The on-axis solenoid field is shown as a dashed line. (<b>Right</b>) Simulated emittance change generated by the system: (red) longitudinal emittance; (blue) transverse emittance; (black) 6d emittance.</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 2516 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
The T2K Near Detector Upgrade
by Aoi Eguchi
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 38; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008038 - 15 Aug 2023
Viewed by 929
Abstract
The T2K experiment is a long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment conducted in Japan. It aims to precisely measure the neutrino oscillation parameters by measuring the muon neutrino beam produced at the J-PARC accelerator complex at both near and far detectors. The magnetized T2K [...] Read more.
The T2K experiment is a long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment conducted in Japan. It aims to precisely measure the neutrino oscillation parameters by measuring the muon neutrino beam produced at the J-PARC accelerator complex at both near and far detectors. The magnetized T2K near detector complex ND280 plays an important role in measuring the neutrino interactions before the oscillations and constraining the systematic uncertainties in the measurements of neutrino oscillation parameters. The physics goals of T2K are to test Charge-Parity (CP) symmetry in the lepton sector, to precisely measure the neutrino oscillation parameters θ23 and Δm322, and to determine the neutrino mass ordering and the octant of θ23. T2K has disfavored CP conservation with a significance level of 2σ, and the higher significance level can be achieved by increasing the statistics and reducing the systematic uncertainties. Thus, the T2K collaboration proposed upgrading ND280 by replacing the P0D detector with a new fine-grained scintillator detector SuperFGD and two Time-Projection Chambers (TPCs). In addition, these new detectors will be covered by six Time Of Flight (TOF) planes. The performances of these upgrade detectors have been tested and confirmed to satisfy the requirements of the ND280 upgrade program. The physics performances of the upgraded ND280 have also been studied and they show promising improvements in neutrino interaction measurements by introducing transverse kinematics variables. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic view of ND280.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic view of upgraded ND280.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Readout mechanism of SuperFGD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Measured charge distributions for protons and muons/pions (MIPs) at the beam test [<a href="#B6-psf-08-00038" class="html-bibr">6</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Schematic view of two types of Micromegas Modules [<a href="#B8-psf-08-00038" class="html-bibr">8</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Measured time resolution of TOFs [<a href="#B10-psf-08-00038" class="html-bibr">10</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparison of muon detection efficiencies with the current and upgraded ND280.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Physics performance studies of ND280 upgrade [<a href="#B11-psf-08-00038" class="html-bibr">11</a>]. (<b>a</b>) Transverse variables, (<b>b</b>) uncertainties in 1p1h interaction as a function of POT, (<b>c</b>) uncertainties in npnh interaction as a function of POT.</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 2717 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
DeeMe—Muon–Electron Conversion Search Experiment
by Kazuhiro Yamamoto
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 39; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008039 - 16 Aug 2023
Viewed by 714
Abstract
This experiment to search for the one of the charged lepton flavor-violating processes, muon-electron conversion, DeeMe, is being conducted at the J-PARC MLF H-Line in Japan. This experiment utilizes a pulsed proton beam from the Rapid Cycling Synchrotron (RCS). A graphite target is [...] Read more.
This experiment to search for the one of the charged lepton flavor-violating processes, muon-electron conversion, DeeMe, is being conducted at the J-PARC MLF H-Line in Japan. This experiment utilizes a pulsed proton beam from the Rapid Cycling Synchrotron (RCS). A graphite target is bombarded with a pulsed proton beam, negative pion production and pion-in-flight-decay to negative muon; then, the creation of muonic atoms is caused in the same pion production target. A converted electron is expected to be emitted after 1 ∼ 2 micro second-delayed timing. And two-body reaction of the new process, μ+(A,Z)e+(A,Z), results in 105 MeV monoenergetic electron. Thus, 1 ∼ 2 micro second-delayed 105 MeV monoenergetic electron is a searched signal. Electrons around 105 MeV are transported by the H-Line and analyzed using the dipole magnet (0.4 T) and four multi-wire proportional chambers (MWPCs). However, the burst pulse reaching 108 charged particles/pulse attributable to the RCS pulse leads to significant dead time for the MWPC. Thus, the HV switching scheme is introduced to handle the prompt burst. The target single event sensitivity is 1013. The H-Line construction was completed, and commissioning went well. The overview of the experiment and the current status are described in this article. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Photo of an overall perspective of J-PARC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic of the DeeMe experiment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Beam structure and the time window for analysis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Cross sectional view of the HV switching MWPC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Gas gain for the analysis time window.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Four MWPCs and a dipole magnet (PACMAN) in the H1 area. The beam comes from the right side.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Beam−profile for 105 MeV/<span class="html-italic">c</span> electrons.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Reconstructed momentum spectrum for a positron dataset at 50 MeV/<span class="html-italic">c</span>.</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 3164 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Machine Learning Applications to Maintain the NuMI Neutrino Beam Quality at Fermilab
by Don Athula Wickremasinghe, Yiding Yu, Eduardo A. Ossorio Alfaro, Sudeshna Ganguly, Katsuya Yonehara and Pavel Snopok
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 40; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008040 - 15 Aug 2023
Viewed by 707
Abstract
The NuMI target facility at Fermilab produces an intense muon neutrino beam for the NOvA (NuMI Off-axis νe Appearance) long baseline neutrino experiment. Three arrays of muon monitors located downstream of the hadron absorber in the NuMI beamline provide the measurements of [...] Read more.
The NuMI target facility at Fermilab produces an intense muon neutrino beam for the NOvA (NuMI Off-axis νe Appearance) long baseline neutrino experiment. Three arrays of muon monitors located downstream of the hadron absorber in the NuMI beamline provide the measurements of the primary beam and horn current quality. We have studied the response of muon monitors with the proton beam profile changes and focusing horn current variations. The responses of muon monitors are used to develop machine learning (ML) algorithms to monitor the beam quality. We present the development of the machine learning applications and future plans. This effort is important for future applications such as beam quality assurance, anomaly detection, and neutrino beam systematics studies. Our results demonstrate the advantages of developing useful ML applications that can be leveraged for future beamlines such as LBNF. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Muon flux centroid measurements as a function of proton beam position at the target. Blue, red and green distributions are the measured centroids on muon monitor 1, 2 and 3 respectively. The horizontal and the vertical scans are shown in the <b>left</b> and <b>right</b> plots, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The correlation between the number of nodes in the 1st and the 4th hidden layers. Example of the hyperparameter optimization to obtain the number of nodes in the hidden layers. The hyperparameters are tuned based on obtaining the lowest objective values as shown in the contour plot.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>A test of the model predictions (orange) of all four output variables for 12 December 2019 target scan data (blue). The beam position is horizontal and vertical; the beam intensity and the horn current are shown in the <b>top left</b>, <b>top right</b>, <b>bottom left</b>, and <b>bottom right</b>, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Horizontal beam position (<b>left</b>) and horn current predictions (<b>right</b>) using a linear regression model on simulation data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Beam position and horn current predictions using CNN model on simulation data. <b>Top left</b> and <b>right</b> show the horizontal and vertical beam positions. The <b>bottom</b> plot compares the horn current predictions.</p>
Full article ">
8 pages, 3959 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Hyper-Kamiokande
by Michael B. Smy
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 41; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008041 - 17 Aug 2023
Viewed by 1105
Abstract
Hyper-Kamiokande, featuring a 260 kton cylindrical water Cherenkov detector, is one of the defining next-generation neutrino experiments. In addition to investigating neutrino oscillations with a dedicated, high-intensity muon neutrino beam, it will study atmospheric neutrinos, solar neutrinos, supernova neutrinos, and other astrophysical neutrinos. [...] Read more.
Hyper-Kamiokande, featuring a 260 kton cylindrical water Cherenkov detector, is one of the defining next-generation neutrino experiments. In addition to investigating neutrino oscillations with a dedicated, high-intensity muon neutrino beam, it will study atmospheric neutrinos, solar neutrinos, supernova neutrinos, and other astrophysical neutrinos. Its physics sensitivity is similar but complementary to other next-generation neutrino experiments: DUNE, a 40 kton liquid Argon time projection chamber, and JUNO, a 20 kton liquid scintillator detector. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>“Box and line” (<b>left</b>) and “Venetian blinds” (<b>right</b>) PMT [<a href="#B3-psf-08-00041" class="html-bibr">3</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>CP violation for known and unknown, normal and inverted mass ordering from beam neutrinos and the combination of beam and atmospheric neutrinos.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>Left</b>): Atmospheric neutrino muon to electron flavor oscillation probability as a function of zenith angle and energy (normal ordering). (<b>Right</b>): Expected significance of the wrong mass ordering rejection as a function of HK running time.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>HK nucleon decay sensitivity: (<b>a</b>) Expected 90% C.L. limits for many modes in HK compared to Frejus, Kamiokande, IMB, SK, and HK. (<b>b</b>) Expected 90% C.L. limits for p→e<sup>+</sup>π<sup>0</sup> and p→K<sup>+</sup>ν in HK compared to SK, JUNO, and DUNE.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Expected HK recoil electron spectrum from solar neutrino-electron elastic scattering. Photocathode coverage is assumed to be 40%. The dominant <sup>8</sup>B component (red) has a smaller endpoint than <span class="html-italic">hep</span> (the blue line shows <sup>8</sup>B + hep combined).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p><b>Left</b>: Distance<sup>3</sup> of the “center of gravity” of “neutron clouds” from hadronic showers with the observed radioactive decays. <b>Right</b>: Angular distribution of additional solar neutrino recoil electron candidates with respect to the solar direction after employing new tagging methods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p><b>Left</b>: Sensitivity of HK to find a non-zero day/night asymmetry (red) and separate predictions based on the solar and KamLAND best-fit Δm<sup>2</sup><sub>21</sub> values. Solid lines are for 40% photo-cathode coverage and dotted lines for 20%. <b>Right</b>: Sensitivity of HK to find significant spectral distortions due to the MSW effect. The solid (dashed) lines are for a 3.5 MeV (4.5 MeV) threshold of recoil electron kinetic energy. The black (red) line assumes the best solar neutrino Δm<sup>2</sup><sub>21</sub> fit of 2019 (2020).</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 790 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Machine Learning Methods for Super-Kamiokande Solar Neutrino Classification
by Alejandro Yankelevich
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 42; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008042 - 18 Aug 2023
Viewed by 878
Abstract
Super-Kamiokande (SK) has observed 8B solar neutrino recoil electrons at kinetic energies as low as 3.49 MeV to study neutrino flavor conversion within the sun. At SK-observable energies, these conversions are dominated by the Mikheyev–Smirnov–Wolfenstein (MSW) effect. An “upturn” in the electron [...] Read more.
Super-Kamiokande (SK) has observed 8B solar neutrino recoil electrons at kinetic energies as low as 3.49 MeV to study neutrino flavor conversion within the sun. At SK-observable energies, these conversions are dominated by the Mikheyev–Smirnov–Wolfenstein (MSW) effect. An “upturn” in the electron neutrino survival probability in which vacuum neutrino oscillations become dominant is predicted to occur at lower energies, but radioactive background increases exponentially with decreasing energy. New machine learning approaches, including convolutional neural networks trained on photomultiplier tube data and boosted decision trees trained on reconstructed variables, provide substantial background reduction in the 2.49–3.49 MeV energy region such that the statistical extraction of solar neutrino interactions becomes feasible. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Predicted <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mrow> <mi>e</mi> <mi>e</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> vs. neutrino energy based on fits to electron energy spectrum of daytime events. The best quadratic fit for all solar experiments (green line), solar + KAMLAND (blue line), and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mi>σ</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> region for SK (green band), SNO (blue band), and SK + SNO (red band) are shown.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>A typical low-energy data event display with PMT relative times. The reconstructed Cherenkov cone is shown in white.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Standard true-positive rate (TPR) vs. false-positive rate (FPR) ROC curve (<b>left</b>) and background rejection (inverse of FPR) vs. MC signal efficiency (TPR) ROC curve (<b>right</b>) for considered classification methods. Legend shows area under curve (AUC) for the standard ROC curve.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Solar angle distribution for data selection (red), background shape (black), and signal + background shape (blue), all with <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mi>σ</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> statistical error bands for the BDT selection (<b>left</b>) and the traditional cut selection (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 675 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Analysis of T2K and MINERνA Semi-Inclusive νμ12C Measurements
by J. M. Franco-Patino, R. González-Jiménez, S. Dolan, M. B. Barbaro, J. A. Caballero, G. D. Megias and J. M. Udias
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 43; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008043 - 22 Aug 2023
Viewed by 668
Abstract
We compare the semi-inclusive νμ12C cross-section measurements via T2K and MINERνA collaborations with the predictions from the SuSAv2-MEC model implemented in the neutrino event generator GENIE and an unfactorized approach based on the relativistic distorted wave impulse [...] Read more.
We compare the semi-inclusive νμ12C cross-section measurements via T2K and MINERνA collaborations with the predictions from the SuSAv2-MEC model implemented in the neutrino event generator GENIE and an unfactorized approach based on the relativistic distorted wave impulse approximation (RDWIA). Results, which include cross-sections as a function of the final muon and proton kinematics as well as correlations between both, show that the agreement with data obtained via the RDWIA approach—which accounts for final-state interactions—matches or improves GENIE-SuSAv2 predictions for very forward angles, where scaling violations are relevant. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>MINER <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>ν</mi> </semantics></math>A [<a href="#B10-psf-08-00043" class="html-bibr">10</a>,<a href="#B11-psf-08-00043" class="html-bibr">11</a>] (<b>left</b>) and T2K [<a href="#B9-psf-08-00043" class="html-bibr">9</a>] (<b>right</b>) CC0<math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>π</mi> </semantics></math> semi-inclusive <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ν</mi> <mi>μ</mi> </msub> <msup> <mo>−</mo> <mn>12</mn> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>C cross sections as a function of the muon (<b>top</b>) and proton (<b>bottom</b>) kinematics. All curves include the 2p2h and pion absorption contributions (also shown separately), evaluated using GENIE. T2K results as a function of the muon kinematics correspond to <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>p</mi> <mi>N</mi> </msub> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mn>0.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> GeV, while the results as a function of the proton kinematics correspond to <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>p</mi> <mi>N</mi> </msub> <mo>&gt;</mo> <mn>0.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> GeV.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>MINER <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>ν</mi> </semantics></math>A [<a href="#B10-psf-08-00043" class="html-bibr">10</a>,<a href="#B11-psf-08-00043" class="html-bibr">11</a>] (<b>top</b>) and T2K [<a href="#B9-psf-08-00043" class="html-bibr">9</a>] (<b>bottom</b>) CC0<math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>π</mi> </semantics></math> semi-inclusive <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ν</mi> <mi>μ</mi> </msub> <msup> <mo>−</mo> <mn>12</mn> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>C cross-sections as a function of the transverse kinematic imbalances <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>δ</mi> <msub> <mi>p</mi> <mi>T</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>δ</mi> <msub> <mi>α</mi> <mi>T</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mfenced separators="" open="|" close="|"> <mi>δ</mi> <msub> <mi>ϕ</mi> <mi>T</mi> </msub> </mfenced> </semantics></math>. All curves include the 2p2h and pion absorption contributions (also shown separately), evaluated using GENIE.</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 3110 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
KM3NeT/ORCA Calibration Procedures and Capabilities
by Antonio De Benedittis
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 44; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008044 - 23 Aug 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 920
Abstract
The cubic-kilometre neutrino telescope (KM3NeT) is a piece of deep-sea infrastructure composed of two neutrino telescopes consisting of large-scale 3D arrays of photomultiplier tubes (PMTs). KM3NeT is currently under construction on the Mediterranean seabed. The two telescopes are ARCA, near Sicily, which is [...] Read more.
The cubic-kilometre neutrino telescope (KM3NeT) is a piece of deep-sea infrastructure composed of two neutrino telescopes consisting of large-scale 3D arrays of photomultiplier tubes (PMTs). KM3NeT is currently under construction on the Mediterranean seabed. The two telescopes are ARCA, near Sicily, which is designed for neutrino astronomy, and ORCA, near Toulon, France, designed for measurement of neutrino oscillations. The ORCA telescope, having a neutrino energy threshold in the GeV range, has as its main research goal the measurement of the neutrino mass ordering and atmospheric neutrino oscillation parameters. In this paper, we discuss the calibration procedures which are necessary to achieve these purposes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>Left</b>) Amplitude of the signal as a function of time; only the portion over the <span class="html-italic">threshold</span> is recorded. (<b>Right</b>) Example of the determination of a time offset for an arbitrary DU.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Time stability of fitted PMT gains of nine PMTs of one ORCA DU operated under the sea, selected from the period between September 2020 and March 2021. The discontinuous jump around run 9100 is due gain calibration operations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>Left</b>) View of a DOM and its ring nomenclature; (<b>Right</b>) time stability of the fitted PMT efficiencies of an arbitrarily chosen DU in the period between January 2020 and March 2022. The effect of sedimentation in the upper rings (<span class="html-italic">E</span> and <span class="html-italic">F</span>) is evident.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Comparison between static (in blue) and dynamic (in orange) calibration as a function of preferred orientation (<b>left</b>) and x-position (<b>right</b>) from reconstructed muon tracks. The preferred orientation and x-position are the time-dependent offsets from the true orientation and position of the DOMs. Because the movements of the DOMs are continuously monitored during dynamic calibration, the distribution is Gaussian with a peak around 0 (as demonstrated by the Gaussian fit in green).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p><b>Moon</b>: (<b>Left</b>) 1D Gaussian fit (in red) of the signal + background hypothesis of the flux of downgoing muons as a function of the angular distance (blue cross); the fit of the background using a constant appears in black. (<b>Center and Right</b>) Results from the 2D (xs, ys) scan with free amplitude.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p><b>Sun</b>: (<b>Left</b>) 1D Gaussian fit (in red) of the signal + background hypothesis of the flux of downgoing muons as a function of the angular distance (blue cross); the fit of the background using a constant appears in black. (<b>Center and Right</b>) Results from the 2D (xs, ys) scan with free amplitude.</p>
Full article ">
5 pages, 1204 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Investigating the Development of STEM-Positive Identities of Refugee Teens in a Physics Out-of-School-Time Experience
by Tino Nyawelo, Sarah Braden, John N. Matthews, Jordan Gerton, Bolaji Bamidele, Melanie Valera Garcia, Raquel Goldrup, Ricardo Gonzalez and Joseph Kiflom
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 45; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008045 - 24 Aug 2023
Viewed by 783
Abstract
Refugee youth resettled in the United States experience two main barriers to long-term participation in STEM fields: (a) access to STEM skills and knowledge which is impacted by relocation and interrupted schooling, and (b) access to crafting positive learner identities in STEM as [...] Read more.
Refugee youth resettled in the United States experience two main barriers to long-term participation in STEM fields: (a) access to STEM skills and knowledge which is impacted by relocation and interrupted schooling, and (b) access to crafting positive learner identities in STEM as multilingual, multicultural, and multiracial youth. In this paper, we share a model for engaging refugee teens in cosmic ray research through constructing scintillator cosmic ray detectors, creating digital stories about cosmic rays, and hosting family and community science events where students share their learning with their families. This context serves as the site for ongoing ethnography exploring how refugee-background teens construct STEM-related identities and identifying supportive and unsupportive instructional practices. This paper summarizes the key program details and findings to date. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic of air shower development.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Student activities.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Students celebrating the successful optical gluing of the light guide to the scintillator panel. (<b>b</b>) A student completing the light seal of a scintillator in preparation for attaching the photomultiplier tube.</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 2745 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
ARIADNE+: Large Scale Demonstration of Fast Optical Readout for Dual-Phase LArTPCs at the CERN Neutrino Platform
by Adam John Lowe, Pablo Amedo-Martinez, Diego González-Díaz, Alexander Deisting, Krishanu Majumdar, Konstantinos Mavrokoridis, Marzio Nessi, Barney Philippou, Francesco Pietropaolo, Sudikshan Ravinthiran, Filippo Resnati, Adam Roberts, Angela Saá Hernández, Christos Touramanis and Jared Vann
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 46; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008046 - 24 Aug 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 925
Abstract
Optical readout of large scale dual-phase liquid Argon TPCs is an attractive alternative to charge readout and has been successfully demonstrated on a 2 × 2 m active region within the CERN protoDUNE cold box. ARIADNE+ uses four Timepix3 cameras imaging the [...] Read more.
Optical readout of large scale dual-phase liquid Argon TPCs is an attractive alternative to charge readout and has been successfully demonstrated on a 2 × 2 m active region within the CERN protoDUNE cold box. ARIADNE+ uses four Timepix3 cameras imaging the S2 light produced by 16 novel, patent pending, glass THGEMs. ARIADNE+ takes advantage of the raw Timepix3 data coming natively 3D and zero suppressed with a 1.6 ns timing resolution. Three of the four THGEM quadrants implement readouts in the visible light range through wavelength shifting, with the fourth featuring a VUV light intensifier, thus removing the need for wavelength shifting altogether. Cosmic ray reconstruction and energy calibration were performed. Presented is a summary of the detector setup and experimental run, preliminary analysis of the run data and future outlook for the ARIADNE program. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The cold box at the Neutrino Platform in optical configuration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Cross-section of the ARIADNE<math display="inline"><semantics> <msup> <mrow/> <mo>+</mo> </msup> </semantics></math> LRP assembly (<b>Left</b>) and LRP integration (<b>Right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Visible events with a spatial resolution of approx. 4 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>VUV events with a spatial resolution of approx. 4 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>A 30 s cosmic ray exposure with visible light (<b>Left</b>) and VUV light (<b>Right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The dI/dX distribution (<b>Left</b>) and the distribution of events used for calculating the calibration and energy resolution (<b>Right</b>).</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 2709 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Characterization of the ERAM Detectors for the High Angle TPC of the T2K near Detector Upgrade
by Matteo Feltre
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 47; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008047 - 30 Aug 2023
Viewed by 902
Abstract
The High-Angle Time Projection Chambers (HA-TPCs) are a new set of detectors that will equip the off-axis near detector (ND280) of the T2K long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiment. A prototype of the Field Cage instrumented with one ERAM detector has been recently exposed to [...] Read more.
The High-Angle Time Projection Chambers (HA-TPCs) are a new set of detectors that will equip the off-axis near detector (ND280) of the T2K long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiment. A prototype of the Field Cage instrumented with one ERAM detector has been recently exposed to a DESY electron beam. In order to ensure that the HA-TPCs satisfy the required performances for the ND280 Upgrade (space point resolution better than 600 µm and dE/dx resolution smaller than 10%), the ERAM detectors have been characterized with X-ray sources and by exposing them to the DESY electron beam. In addition, a detailed simulation of the charge spreading phenomenon and of the electronic response is reported. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Section of a bulk Micromegas (<b>left</b>) compared to a ERAM sensor (<b>right</b>) [<a href="#B5-psf-08-00047" class="html-bibr">5</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Mean value of response from mesh pulsing for ERAM 11 for each pad (<b>a</b>) and histogram of mean values (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Map of gain for each pad of ERAM 11 (<b>a</b>) and ERAM 23 (<b>b</b>) obtained with X-ray test bench. Unexpected regular patterns are visible on ERAM 11.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Mean value of response from X-ray scan dependence on Voltage applied to DLC (<b>a</b>) and on gas pressure and temperature ratio with voltage applied to DLC V<math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mrow/> <mrow> <mi>D</mi> <mi>L</mi> <mi>C</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> = 350 V (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Spatial resolution comparison between data collected at DESY 2019 (<b>a</b>) and 2021 (<b>b</b>) test beams and MC simulations.</p>
Full article ">
5 pages, 3175 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Detection of High-Energy Neutrinos at the Large Hadron Collider with the Scattering and Neutrino Detector
by Masahiro Komatsu
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 48; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008048 - 31 Aug 2023
Viewed by 706
Abstract
SND@LHC is designed to perform measurements with neutrinos produced at the LHC in the pseudo-rapidity range of 7.2<η<8.4. The experiment is located 480 m downstream of the ATLAS interaction point in the TI18 tunnel. The detector is a [...] Read more.
SND@LHC is designed to perform measurements with neutrinos produced at the LHC in the pseudo-rapidity range of 7.2<η<8.4. The experiment is located 480 m downstream of the ATLAS interaction point in the TI18 tunnel. The detector is a hybrid system composed of an 830 kg target made from 1 mm thick tungsten plates interleaved with nuclear emulsion films, electronic trackers also acting as an electromagnetic calorimeter, a hadronic calorimeter and a muon identification system. The detector is able to distinguish three neutrino flavours using the emulsion detector which can identify primary electrons and taus in charged current neutrino interactions. This capability allows probing heavy flavour forward production at the LHC, which even LHCb cannot access. The LHC CM energy corresponds to the 1017 eV astronomical energy region, which is of interest for future detectors. The SND@LHC’s capabilities and current status are reported in this document. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Layout of the SND@LHC experiment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Interacted neutrino energy spectrum of the three neutrino flavours for 290 fb<sup>−1</sup>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Detector installation in the TI18 tunnel.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Muons from p–p collisions at 13.6 TeV recorded on 6 July 2022.</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 8566 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
The Camera System for the IceCube Upgrade
by Woosik Kang, Jiwoong Lee, Steven Rodan, Carsten Rott and Christoph Tönnis
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 49; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008049 - 1 Sep 2023
Viewed by 888
Abstract
As part of a currently ongoing upgrade to the IceCube Neutrino Observatory, seven new strings will be deployed in the central region of the detector to enhance the capability to detect neutrinos in the GeV range. A main science objective of the IceCube [...] Read more.
As part of a currently ongoing upgrade to the IceCube Neutrino Observatory, seven new strings will be deployed in the central region of the detector to enhance the capability to detect neutrinos in the GeV range. A main science objective of the IceCube Upgrade is to improve the calibration of the IceCube detector as a means of reducing systematic uncertainties related to the optical properties of the ice. A novel camera and illumination system, consisting of more than 1900 cameras, in 700 newly developed optical modules of the IceCube Upgrade, has been developed. A combination of transmission and reflection photographic measurements will be used to measure the optical properties of bulk ice between strings and refrozen ice in the drill hole, to determine module positions, and to survey the local ice environments surrounding the sensor module. In this contribution, we present the production, acceptance testing, and the plan for post-deployment calibration measurements with this camera system. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Images of the camera systems in the new optical sensors. Dashed red boxes indicate the cameras and LEDs. <b>Left</b>: A pair of cameras and LEDs for the mDOM that are integrated directly into the 3D-printed PMT holding structure. The cameras look through the glass of the pressure vessel via windows in the holding structure. <b>Right</b>: Cameras for the D-EGGs, which are attached to rings made from fibre-reinforced plastic (FR-4) using aluminium brackets. The rings are glued to the glass of the D-EGG pressure vessels using room-temperature vulcanizing silicone glue.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic of planned measurements of the IceCube Upgrade camera system. <b>Left</b>: Refrozen hole ice measurement utilising two vertically separated optical sensors on the same string. A downward-facing camera observes light from an upward-pointing LED of the optical sensor below. <b>Right</b>: Bulk ice measurement utilising two optical modules on two different strings. A camera is observing scattered light from an LED on an adjacent string pointing at an angle of <math display="inline"><semantics> <msup> <mn>60</mn> <mo>∘</mo> </msup> </semantics></math> to the camera. The schematics are not to scale.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The expected camera images from the simulations. <b>Left</b>: the image represents visualising a column of ice with different optical properties than the surrounding ice, known as the ‘Bubble column’ in the refrozen hole ice. <b>Right</b>: the image shows the light cone from an optical sensor observed from another optical sensor on the adjacent string in the simulation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The results from camera tests at a swimming pool and at the South Pole. <b>Top</b>: the images taken in the swimming pool water. The left image shows an IceCube DOM at mid-depth at 2 m distance from the camera. The details of the DOM are clearly seen. The right picture represents two light beacons with 10 cm separation facing upward on the swimming pool floor at a distance of 25 m from the camera. The camera resolves the two beacons well. <b>Bottom</b>: the plots for comparison of the dust logger [<a href="#B17-psf-08-00049" class="html-bibr">17</a>] and the camera brightness data as a function of depth between 1200 m and 1600 m. The upper panel gives the data points from each system and the lower panel shows the ratio of brightness between the camera data and the dust logger data. A detailed description is given in [<a href="#B15-psf-08-00049" class="html-bibr">15</a>].</p>
Full article ">
5 pages, 5675 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Status of the muEDM Experiment at PSI
by Kim Siang Khaw, Cheng Chen, Massimo Giovannozzi, Tianqi Hu, Meng Lv, Jun Kai Ng, Angela Papa, Philipp Schmidt-Wellenburg, Bastiano Vitali and Guan Ming Wong
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 50; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008050 - 4 Sep 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1004
Abstract
Permanent electric dipole moments (EDMs) are excellent probes of physics beyond the Standard Model, especially on new sources of CP violation. The muon EDM has recently attracted significant attention due to discrepancies in the magnetic anomaly of the muon, as well as potential [...] Read more.
Permanent electric dipole moments (EDMs) are excellent probes of physics beyond the Standard Model, especially on new sources of CP violation. The muon EDM has recently attracted significant attention due to discrepancies in the magnetic anomaly of the muon, as well as potential violations of lepton-flavor universality in B-meson decays. At the Paul Scherrer Institute in Switzerland, we have proposed a muon EDM search experiment employing the frozen-spin technique, where a radial electric field is exerted within a storage solenoid to cancel the muon’s anomalous spin precession. Consequently, the EDM signal can be inferred from the upstream-downstream asymmetry of the decay positron count versus time. The experiment is planned to take place in two phases, anticipating an annual statistical sensitivity of 3×1021e·cm for Phase I and 6×1023e·cm for Phase II. Going beyond 1021e·cm will enable us to probe various Standard Model extensions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>A sketch of the Phase I muEDM experiment at PSI. Side view (<b>left</b>) and front view (<b>right</b>) of the demonstrator device using an existing solenoid magnet with a field strength of 3 T.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p><b>Left</b>: A detailed three-dimensional CAD model of the muon entrance detector. <b>Right</b>: An image of the actual prototype entrance detector developed for the test beam at PSI. The close-up views (insets) display the SiPM readout boards designed for the telescope scintillators.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p><b>Left</b>: Event display from the WaveDAQ digitizer. <b>Right</b>: Correlation plot between the top and right scintillators of the prototype entrance detector.</p>
Full article ">
7 pages, 782 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Probing Light Mediators and Neutrino Electromagnetic Moments with Atomic Radiative Emission of Neutrino Pairs
by Shao-Feng Ge and Pedro Pasquini
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 51; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008051 - 6 Sep 2023
Viewed by 705
Abstract
We present the novel idea of using the atomic radiative emission of neutrino pairs to test physics beyond the Standard Model, including light vector/scalar mediators and the anomalous neutrino electromagnetic moments. With O(eV) momentum transfer, atomic transitions are particularly sensitive to light [...] Read more.
We present the novel idea of using the atomic radiative emission of neutrino pairs to test physics beyond the Standard Model, including light vector/scalar mediators and the anomalous neutrino electromagnetic moments. With O(eV) momentum transfer, atomic transitions are particularly sensitive to light mediators and can improve their coupling strength sensitivity by 3∼4 orders of magnitude. In particular, the massless photon belongs to this category. The projected sensitivity with respect to neutrino electromagnetic moments is competitive with dark matter experiments. Most importantly, neutrino pair emission provides the possibility of separating the electric and magnetic moments, even identifying their individual elements, which is not possible by existing observations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>Left</b>) The spectral function <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="script">I</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mi>ω</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> of Yb as a function of the trigger laser frequency <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>ω</mi> </semantics></math> for the normal ordering and lightest neutrino mass <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>m</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.01</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> eV for light vector/scalar mediators; also shown are the projected sensitivities for vector (<b>Middle</b>) and scalar (<b>Right</b>) mediators.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The first two panels show the spectral functions for the electric (<b>Left</b>) and magnetic (<b>Middle</b>) moments; also shown are the projected sensitivities for various elements of the neutrino electromagnetic moments (<b>Right</b>). In all cases, we use normal ordering and take the lightest neutrino mass to be <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>m</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.01</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> eV.</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 693 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Pion–Argon Inclusive Cross-Section Measurement on ProtoDUNE-SP
by Yinrui Liu
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 52; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008052 - 8 Sep 2023
Viewed by 901
Abstract
The pion–argon cross-section measurement is crucial to understanding effects such as final state interactions, which account for a large source of systematic uncertainty in neutrino oscillation experiments. ProtoDUNE-SP, with its beam of charged particles, can provide such experimental constraints. This paper elaborates on [...] Read more.
The pion–argon cross-section measurement is crucial to understanding effects such as final state interactions, which account for a large source of systematic uncertainty in neutrino oscillation experiments. ProtoDUNE-SP, with its beam of charged particles, can provide such experimental constraints. This paper elaborates on the methodology to measure the cross-section on large-scale liquid argon time projection chambers like ProtoDUNE-SP. We use the 1 GeV Monte-Carlo (MC) sample to demonstrate the analysis procedures. The cross-section measurements for pion kinetic energy ranging from 350 MeV to 950 MeV are performed on the MC sample. The consistency of the MC results with its input values serves as validation of the method and the procedures, which we will later use to perform measurements on the data sample. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Demonstration of the energy slicing method. In this example, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>E</mi> <mi>ini</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>866</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> MeV, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>E</mi> <mi>end</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>627</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> MeV.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Pion–argon inclusive cross-section results for the 1 GeV fake data sample.</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 1143 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
T2K Oscillation Analysis Results: Latest Analysis Improvements at the Far Detector
by Kenji Yasutome on behalf of the T2K Collaboration
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 53; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008053 - 11 Sep 2023
Viewed by 710
Abstract
T2K (Tokai to Kamioka) is a long baseline neutrino experiment that exploits a neutrino and antineutrino beam produced at the Japan Particle Accelerator Research Centre (J-PARC) to provide world-leading measurements of the parameters governing neutrino oscillation. Neutrino oscillations are analyzed by tuning the [...] Read more.
T2K (Tokai to Kamioka) is a long baseline neutrino experiment that exploits a neutrino and antineutrino beam produced at the Japan Particle Accelerator Research Centre (J-PARC) to provide world-leading measurements of the parameters governing neutrino oscillation. Neutrino oscillations are analyzed by tuning the neutrino rates and spectra at a near detector complex, located at J-PARC, and extrapolating them to the water Cherenkov far detector, Super-Kamiokande, located 295 km away, where oscillations are observed. The latest T2K results include multiple analysis improvements, in particular, a new sample is added for the far detector analysis, requiring the presence of a pion in muon-neutrino interactions. This is the first time that a pion sample has been included in the study of neutrino disappearance at T2K and the first time a sample with more than one Cherenkov ring has been included in the T2K oscillation analysis, opening a road for further samples with charged and neutral pion tagging. The inclusion of such a sample enables proper control of the oscillated spectrum in a larger neutrino energy range and on subleading neutrino interaction processes. Finally, T2K is engaged with the Super-Kamiokande collaboration to combine T2K neutrino beam data and Super-Kamiokande atmospheric data to perform a joint fit of the oscillation parameters. Such a combination allows the degeneracies between the measurement of the CP-violating phase δCP and the measurement of the ordering of the neutrino mass eigenstates to be lifted. A precise evaluation of the enhanced sensitivity of this joint fit will be presented. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Reconstructed energy distributions of the one decay electron sub-sample (<b>left</b>) and the two decay electrons sub-sample (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>One-dimensional contours of the Feldman and Cousins method for <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>δ</mi> <mi>CP</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> (<b>left</b>) and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msup> <mo form="prefix">sin</mo> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <msub> <mi>θ</mi> <mn>23</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>right</b>). Each confidence region is indicated by colored regions for both mass-ordering scenarios.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Comparisons of one-dimensional contours by the fixed chi-squared method between six samples with the new sample and five conventional samples without the new sample for the two kinds of oscillation parameters (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mi> <msubsup> <mi>m</mi> <mn>32</mn> <mn>2</mn> </msubsup> <mspace width="4pt"/> </mrow> </semantics></math>on the <b>left</b> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msup> <mo form="prefix">sin</mo> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <msub> <mi>θ</mi> <mn>23</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> on the <b>right</b>). For <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mi> <msubsup> <mi>m</mi> <mn>32</mn> <mn>2</mn> </msubsup> <mspace width="4pt"/> </mrow> </semantics></math>contours, additional Gaussian smearing (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>σ</mi> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <mo>=</mo> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <mn>0.031</mn> <mo>×</mo> <msup> <mn>10</mn> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </msup> <msup> <mi>eV</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <mo>/</mo> <msup> <mi mathvariant="normal">c</mi> <mn>4</mn> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>) was applied from the results of potential bias studies using alternative neutrino interaction models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Evolution plots for <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>δ</mi> <mi>CP</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> (<b>left</b>) and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msup> <mo form="prefix">sin</mo> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <msub> <mi>θ</mi> <mn>23</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>right</b>). Each color refers to the step-by-step evolution of analysis improvements. Blue (A): The previous analysis results shown at the Neutrino 2020 conference. Orange (B): A + updates on neutrino interaction models with the new near detector samples. Green (C): B + updates of constraints in <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msup> <mo form="prefix">sin</mo> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <msub> <mi>θ</mi> <mn>13</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> based on PDG2021. Red (D): C + the new sample added to the far detector samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Sensitivity studies in the joint fits to show the power of breaking <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>δ</mi> <mi>CP</mi> </msub> </semantics></math>-mass ordering degeneracy (<b>left</b>) and increasing power to reject wrong mass ordering (<b>right</b>). The study assumed the same statistics as in the latest oscillation analysis; <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mn>1.9664</mn> <mo>×</mo> <msup> <mn>10</mn> <mn>21</mn> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math> protons on target (POT) in neutrino mode and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mn>1.6346</mn> <mo>×</mo> <msup> <mn>10</mn> <mn>21</mn> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math> POT in anti-neutrino mode. The following true oscillation values are assumed in fits; <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msup> <mo form="prefix">sin</mo> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <msub> <mi>θ</mi> <mn>23</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math><math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.528</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mi> <msubsup> <mi>m</mi> <mn>32</mn> <mn>2</mn> </msubsup> <mspace width="4pt"/> </mrow> </semantics></math><math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2.509</mn> <mo>×</mo> <msup> <mn>10</mn> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </msup> <msup> <mi>eV</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <mo>/</mo> <msup> <mi mathvariant="normal">c</mi> <mn>4</mn> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msup> <mo form="prefix">sin</mo> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <msub> <mi>θ</mi> <mn>13</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math><math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.0218</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, mass ordering = normal ordering.</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 505 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Neutrino Oscillations in the Earth: A Unique Tool to Probe Dark Matter Inside the Core
by Anuj Kumar Upadhyay, Anil Kumar, Sanjib Kumar Agarwalla and Amol Dighe
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 54; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008054 - 11 Sep 2023
Viewed by 705
Abstract
Atmospheric neutrinos, due to their multi-GeV range of energies and wide range of baselines, can probe into the possible existence of dark matter inside the core of the Earth in a unique way via Earth matter effects in neutrino oscillations. We demonstrate that [...] Read more.
Atmospheric neutrinos, due to their multi-GeV range of energies and wide range of baselines, can probe into the possible existence of dark matter inside the core of the Earth in a unique way via Earth matter effects in neutrino oscillations. We demonstrate that an atmospheric neutrino detector such as the proposed 50 kt Iron Calorimeter detector at the India-based Neutrino Observatory with muon charge identification capability can be sensitive to the presence of dark matter at around a 2σ confidence level with 1000 kt·yr exposure if dark matter constitutes 40% of the mass inside the core. We further demonstrate that it is hard to identify the dark matter profile using neutrino oscillations, but the baryonic matter profile inside the core can be explored as a complement to the seismic measurements. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Baryonic density profiles of the Earth, obtained by reducing the density of the core by the DM fraction <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>f</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">D</mi> </msub> </semantics></math>. In the scenario without DM, the density profile is represented by the standard 25-layered PREM profile, given by the black curve. Different line-style curves correspond to different values of <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>f</mi> <mi>D</mi> </msub> </semantics></math>. The same will follow in the later figures. This figure is taken from Ref. [<a href="#B6-psf-08-00054" class="html-bibr">6</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Three-flavor <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>ν</mi> <mi>μ</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> survival probability oscillograms in the (<math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>E</mi> <mi>ν</mi> </msub> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo form="prefix">cos</mo> <msub> <mi>θ</mi> <mi>ν</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>) plane. (<b>Left panel</b>): PREM profile with no dark matter. (<b>Right panel</b>): modified PREM profile with DM fraction <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>f</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">D</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>40</mn> <mo>%</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> in the core. In the right panel, the NOLR/PR resonance around (5 GeV, −0.9) is significantly diluted as indicated by white circles. This figure is taken from Ref. [<a href="#B6-psf-08-00054" class="html-bibr">6</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The sensitivity with which ICAL may exclude a given value of <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>f</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">D</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> in terms of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>Δ</mo> <msubsup> <mi>χ</mi> <mi>DM</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math>. The thin (thick) curves correspond to 10 (20) years of exposure. The solid (dashed) curves correspond to with (without) CID capability of the ICAL detector. This figure is taken from Ref. [<a href="#B6-psf-08-00054" class="html-bibr">6</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>Top left</b>): some representative baryonic density profiles with the form <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ρ</mi> <mi>B</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>r</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mo>=</mo> <mi>a</mi> <mo>−</mo> <mi>b</mi> <msup> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>r</mi> <mo>/</mo> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mi>CMB</mi> </msub> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>Top right</b>): color gradients of <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>f</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">D</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> inside the core in the <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>a</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>b</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> plane. (<b>Bottom panels</b>): color gradients of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>Δ</mo> <msubsup> <mi>χ</mi> <mi>DM</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> in the <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>a</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>b</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> plane, the left panel without CID and the right panel with CID. The markers with different colors and types show density profiles in the top left panel corresponding to the markers with the same colors and types in the other three panels. The yellow line of the form <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>b</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mi>γ</mi> <mi>a</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> shows the various core density profiles that look almost similar to the scaled-down versions of the 25-layered PREM profile inside the core. This figure is taken from Ref. [<a href="#B6-psf-08-00054" class="html-bibr">6</a>].</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 1796 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Cosmogenic Background Suppression at ICARUS
by Biswaranjan Behera
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 55; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008055 - 15 Sep 2023
Viewed by 717
Abstract
The ICARUS detector will search for LSND-like neutrino oscillations exposed at shallow depths to the FNAL BNB beam, acting as the far detector in the short-baseline neutrino (SBN) program. Cosmic background rejection is particularly important for the ICARUS detector due to its larger [...] Read more.
The ICARUS detector will search for LSND-like neutrino oscillations exposed at shallow depths to the FNAL BNB beam, acting as the far detector in the short-baseline neutrino (SBN) program. Cosmic background rejection is particularly important for the ICARUS detector due to its larger size and distance from neutrino production compared to the near detector SBND. In ICARUS, the neutrino signal over the cosmic background ratio is 40 times more unfavorable compared to SBND, partly due to an out-of-spill cosmic rate that is over three times higher. In this paper, we will illustrate techniques for reducing cosmogenic backgrounds in the ICARUS detector with initial commissioning data. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>A sketch of the CRT geometry with coordinates (<b>left</b>). End point of primary neutrons and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>γ</mi> </semantics></math>s as seen in a Y/Z projection, without OB (<b>middle</b>) and with overburden (<b>right</b>) (the <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>ν</mi> </semantics></math> beam is along the z axis). The black square shows the position of the TPCs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Cosmic ray rates as functions of time for a set of the top CRT horizontal (<b>left</b>) and vertical (<b>right</b>) modules. Numbers in the legend indicate the module’s front-end boards and the black dot lines indicate the beginning and the end of 3 m overburden installation over the displayed modules. The rates were reduced from approximately 610 Hz to 330 Hz for horizontal modules and from 260 Hz to 180 Hz for vertical modules after the installation of the overburden.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The figure portrays the method of the CRT hit and TPC track association (<b>left</b>). The distance of the closest approaches (cm) for all tracks (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The figure depicts the method of the CRT hit and PMT flash matching (<b>left</b>). The quantity “<math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> <mi>R</mi> <mi>T</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> − <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>M</mi> <mi>T</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>” represents the time difference between the arrival of a signal at the cosmic ray tagger (CRT) and the corresponding signal at the photomultiplier tube (PMT). This time difference provides valuable information for distinguishing between different types of tracks in the detector. The time difference between CRT hits (from top CRT) and PMT flashes using the BNB spill (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>This is a real event taken in September 2021. Here, each track is of cosmic origin. The orange lines represent the anode, while the blue lines signify the cathode. The space between these two lines is referred to as the drift window.</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 17361 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
The Search for Short Baseline Neutrino Oscillation with the ICARUS Detector
by Biswaranjan Behera
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 56; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008056 - 15 Sep 2023
Viewed by 732
Abstract
The 476-ton active mass ICARUS T-600 Liquid Argon Time Projection Chamber (LArTPC) is a pioneering development that has become the template for neutrino and rare event detectors, including the massive next-generation international Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment. It began operation in 2010 at the [...] Read more.
The 476-ton active mass ICARUS T-600 Liquid Argon Time Projection Chamber (LArTPC) is a pioneering development that has become the template for neutrino and rare event detectors, including the massive next-generation international Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment. It began operation in 2010 at the underground Gran Sasso National Laboratories and was transported to Fermilab in the US in 2017. To ameliorate the impact of shallow-depth operation at Fermilab, the detector has been enhanced with the addition of a new high granularity light detection system inside the LAr volume along with an external cosmic ray tagging system. Currently in the final stages of commissioning, ICARUS is the largest LArTPC ever to operate in a neutrino beam. On this note, we describe the current status of the ICARUS detector and its achievements in this presentation, and review the plans for ongoing development of the analysis tools needed to fulfill its physics program. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The combined analysis of near and far detector data has permitted the currently allowed parameter region to be covered with 5<math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>σ</mi> </semantics></math> sensitivity in both the appearance and disappearance channels in three years of data taking.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The east and west ICARUS cryostats were placed in the SBN Far Detector pit at Fermilab in August 2018 (<b>left</b>). A picture of the side CRT is shown (<b>center</b>). Installation of the top CRT horizontal modules was completed in December 2021 (<b>right</b>). The bottom CRT is not visible in these pictures.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Trend of the drift in the electron lifetime in the two ICARUS cryostats during the commissioning phase. The sharp decreases in the lifetime are due to programmed interventions performed on the LAr recirculation pumps or the cryogenic system. It can be seen that the electron lifetime recovers quickly after these interventions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Using anode–cathode-crossing cosmic muon ICARUS data, the results show the ionization drift velocity measurement and Crystal Ball fits to the maximum ionization drift time distributions in the two TPCs of the west cryostat (<b>left</b>). Using ICARUS commissioning data, the spatial offsets in the drift direction were measured using anode–cathode-crossing cosmic muon tracks as a function of ionization drift distance in the west cryostat (2 TPC) and compared with Monte Carlo simulations of spatial distortions from calculation of the space charge effects (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Excess of neutrino interactions over cosmic rays in the spill as detected for the BNB (<b>left</b>) and NuMI (<b>right</b>) beams.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>CRT hit time relative to the neutrino gate start time in the south wall (side CRT) for the BNB (<b>left</b>) and NuMI (<b>right</b>) neutrino beams.</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 5440 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
ESSνSB+ Target Station Concept
by Tamer Tolba and Eric Baussan
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 57; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008057 - 18 Sep 2023
Viewed by 615
Abstract
In the search for the CP violation (CPV) in the leptonic sector, crucial information was obtained a decade ago from reactor and accelerator experiments. The discovery and measurement of the third neutrino mixing angle, θ13, with a value ∼9, [...] Read more.
In the search for the CP violation (CPV) in the leptonic sector, crucial information was obtained a decade ago from reactor and accelerator experiments. The discovery and measurement of the third neutrino mixing angle, θ13, with a value ∼9, allow for the possibility to discover the leptonic Dirac CP-violating angle, δCP, with long baseline neutrino Super Beams. ESSνSB is a long-baseline neutrino project that will be able to measure the CPV in the leptonic sector at the second oscillation maximum, where the sensitivity of the experiment is higher compared to that at the first oscillation maximum. The extension project, ESSνSB+, aims to address a very challenging task on measuring the neutrino–nucleon cross-section, which is the dominant term of the systematic uncertainty, in the energy range 0.2–0.6 GeV, using a Low-Energy nuSTORM (LEnuSTORM) and an ENUBET-like Low-Energy Monitored Neutrino Beam (LEMNB) facilities. The target station plays the main role in generating a well defined and focused pion, and hence muon, beam. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The ESS layout with the proposed modifications for the ESS<math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>ν</mi> </semantics></math>SB and ESS<math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>ν</mi> </semantics></math>SB+ experiments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>Top</b>) A 3D drawing of the four-horn target system. (<b>Bottom</b>) A 3D model of the target concept based on a packed bed of titanium spheres.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>A conceptual drawing of the ESS<math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>ν</mi> </semantics></math>SB+ target station facility, with the concept of the Pion Extraction and Initial Focusing System.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>Left</b>) Secondary beam distribution, with 2D Gaussian fit (black circles), at 10 <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi mathvariant="normal">m</mi> </semantics></math> from the horn exit. (<b>Right</b>) BGOOD dipole magnet at the ELSA facility in Bonn University [<a href="#B11-psf-08-00057" class="html-bibr">11</a>].</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 1458 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Photon Detection System for DUNE Low-Energy Physics Study and the Demonstration of a Timing Resolution of a Few Nanoseconds Using ProtoDUNE-SP PDS
by Ajib Paudel
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 58; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008058 - 18 Sep 2023
Viewed by 805
Abstract
Photon detection systems (PDS) are an integral part of liquid-argon neutrino detectors. Besides providing the timing information for an event, which is necessary for reconstructing the drift coordinates of ionizing particle tracks, photon detectors can be effectively used for other purposes, including triggering [...] Read more.
Photon detection systems (PDS) are an integral part of liquid-argon neutrino detectors. Besides providing the timing information for an event, which is necessary for reconstructing the drift coordinates of ionizing particle tracks, photon detectors can be effectively used for other purposes, including triggering events, background rejection, and calorimetric energy estimation. PDS in particular for the DUNE Far Detector Module 2 is designed to achieve a more extended optical coverage (→4 π) with new-generation large-size PD modules based on the ARAPUCA technology. This will provide enhanced opportunities for the study of low-energy neutrino physics using PDS. The ARAPUCA technology was extensively tested within the ProtoDUNE-SP detector operated at the CERN neutrino platform. Here, we present a study of the timing resolution of ARAPUCA detectors using light emitted from a sample of energetic cosmic ray muons traveling parallel to the PDS. An intrinsic timing resolution in the order of 3 ns is observed for the ARAPUCA detectors. The excellent timing resolution ability of PDS can be exploited for further enhancing physics studies using the DUNE far detectors. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Photon detectors using different technology embedded in APA; the photodetector arrays are shown in the inserts. Figure taken from [<a href="#B1-psf-08-00058" class="html-bibr">1</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Waveforms as seen by two different ARAPUCA channels (<b>a, b</b>) for the same cosmic muon event. Waveforms reprsent signal amplitude as a function of time.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Blue markers: five points of the waveform near the rising edge of the signal for two nearby ARAPUCA channels (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>); the first point is selected below the amplitude of a single photo-electron (SPE) and the remaining four points are selected above the amplitude SPE. Red line: fit of the waveform with Gaussian function. Using the fit, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>t</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> for a and b is measured to be 814.44 ticks and 815.03 ticks, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Difference in time measured by two different ARAPUCA channels. A timing resolution of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mn>5.2</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> ns is determined from the fit (red line). (<b>b</b>) Timing resolution taking different pairs of ARAPUCA detectors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Timing resolution vs. average number of photons detected. Error bars indicate statistical variability, representing the standard deviations of the mean values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) The VD R&amp;D path for an electrically isolated (only optically connected through fibers) low-noise photon detector concept. (<b>b</b>) The first signals seen on the digital scope when PoF was turned on for both the ON and OFF cathode HV modes. The figure is taken from [<a href="#B5-psf-08-00058" class="html-bibr">5</a>].The tests were carried out at LAr temperature.</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 1891 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
A Pion-Production Target for Mu2e-II: Design and Prototype
by David Neuffer, Ingrid Fang, Ao Liu, Kevin Lynch, Stefan Mueller, Vitaly Pronskikh, James Popp and David Pushka
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 59; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008059 - 20 Sep 2023
Viewed by 837
Abstract
The higher beam intensity available for Mu2e-II will require a substantially different target design. This paper discusses our recent advances in conceptual R&D for a Mu2e-II target station. The design is based on energy deposition and radiation damage simulations, as well as thermal [...] Read more.
The higher beam intensity available for Mu2e-II will require a substantially different target design. This paper discusses our recent advances in conceptual R&D for a Mu2e-II target station. The design is based on energy deposition and radiation damage simulations, as well as thermal and mechanical analyses, to estimate the survivability of the system. We considered rotated targets, fixed granular targets and a novel conveyor target with tungsten or carbon spherical elements that are circulated through the beam path. The motion of the spheres can be generated either mechanically or both mechanically and by a He gas flow. The simulations identified the conveyor target as the preferred approach, and that approach has been developed into a prototype. We describe this first prototype for the Mu2e-II target and report on its mechanical tests performed at Fermilab, which indicate the feasibility of the design, and discuss its challenges as well as suggest directions for further improvement. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Three target design options. (<b>Left</b>)—rotating elements target; (<b>Center</b>)—fixed granular target with gas cooling; (<b>Right</b>)—conveyor-type target. The incoming beam direction is indicated by the red arrows.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Simulation models of the W conveyor target within the HRS of the production solenoid. Red arrow indicates path of incident proton beam. (<b>Left</b>): MARS15. (<b>Right</b>): FLUKA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Energy deposition in W spheres as simulated with MARS15 and FLUKA. Target sphere # refers to the target sphere sequential number.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>ANSYS analysis of the conveyor target. (<b>Left</b>): maximum temperature in one cycle. (<b>Right</b>): maximum mechanical deformation in one cycle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The first prototype of the conveyor target. (<b>Left</b>): as constructed. (<b>Right</b>): a CAD model used in the fabrication.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>Left</b>): Belt driven drive for circulating spheres, as built in the first prototype. (<b>Right</b>): a sprocket-based drive for circulating spheres.</p>
Full article ">
5 pages, 1450 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
SBND Trigger System: Status and MTC/A Configuration
by G. V. Stenico
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 60; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008060 - 26 Sep 2023
Viewed by 737
Abstract
We present a brief description of the Short-Baseline Near Detector (SBND) hardware trigger system. The SBND experiment is a liquid argon neutrino detector that sits on the central axis of the Booster Neutrino Beam (BNB), located at Fermilab. The detector is currently being [...] Read more.
We present a brief description of the Short-Baseline Near Detector (SBND) hardware trigger system. The SBND experiment is a liquid argon neutrino detector that sits on the central axis of the Booster Neutrino Beam (BNB), located at Fermilab. The detector is currently being assembled and is expected to start operating in 2023. Neutrinos delivered by the BNB will interact with liquid argon inside the SBND, producing charge and scintillation light that will be collected, respectively, by the charge collection wires and the photon detection system. SBND will record over a million neutrino interaction events per year while simultaneously being exposed to a large flux of cosmic ray interactions. It is imperative to determine which events in the detector are of interest for analysis. This is the work of the SBND trigger system, which receives several prompt inputs, discriminates these inputs and qualifies them to form a trigger decision. In this work, we will focus on the general overview of the trigger system for SBND, and, specifically, we describe the configuration of the Analog Master Trigger Card used in the photon detection trigger. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Front view of the Photon Trigger Board (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA), showing connectors in the chassis for some electronic subsystems: PDS, timing and LArTPC (NEVIS) trigger board.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Summary of SBND Trigger System showing the main connections the Photon Trigger Board has with other trigger subsystems, timing and DAQ. The arrows show the direction of data stream and colors state the purpose of the connection, defined in the bottom right label.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Oscilloscope channels streaming the signals for programming 3.9 V in one single MTC/A threshold: channel 1 (yellow curve) represents the “high” threshold value, channel 3 (magenta curve) is the clock action and channel 4 (green curve) is the reset bar. The oscilloscope cursors “b” and “a” highlight the bit values changing at the clock-edge fall.</p>
Full article ">
4 pages, 246 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Favourable Conditions for Majorana Phase Appearance in Neutrino Oscillation Probabilities
by Khushboo Dixit, Akhila Kumar Pradhan and S. Uma Sankar
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 61; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008061 - 8 Oct 2023
Viewed by 792
Abstract
The Majorana phases of neutrino mixing matrix do not appear either in vacuum or in matter modified oscillation probabilities. It was previously shown that for some particular forms of decoherence, the neutrino oscillations do depend on Majorana phases. Here, we show that such [...] Read more.
The Majorana phases of neutrino mixing matrix do not appear either in vacuum or in matter modified oscillation probabilities. It was previously shown that for some particular forms of decoherence, the neutrino oscillations do depend on Majorana phases. Here, we show that such dependence also occurs for neutrino decay scenarios where mass eigenstates are not the decay eigenstates. We calculate two flavour survival/oscillation probabilities in such a scenario and discuss their CP and CPT properties. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
7 pages, 6869 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Measurement of Atmospheric Muon Neutrino Disappearance Using CNN Reconstructions with IceCube
by Shiqi Yu
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 62; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008062 - 8 Oct 2023
Viewed by 686
Abstract
The IceCube Neutrino Observatory is a Cherenkov detector located at the South Pole, instrumenting a cubic kilometer of ice. The DeepCore subdetector is located at the lower center of the IceCube array, and has denser configuration that has improved ability to see GeV-scale [...] Read more.
The IceCube Neutrino Observatory is a Cherenkov detector located at the South Pole, instrumenting a cubic kilometer of ice. The DeepCore subdetector is located at the lower center of the IceCube array, and has denser configuration that has improved ability to see GeV-scale neutrinos in the detector. Convolutional neural networks (CNN) are used to reconstruct neutrino interactions in DeepCore, achieving comparable performance to the current likelihood-based method but with roughly 3000 times faster processing speeds. In this study, we present a preliminary atmospheric muon neutrino disappearance analysis using the CNN-reconstructed neutrino sample, and the sensitivity to neutrino oscillation parameter measurements is shown and compared to the recent IceCube results. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>IceCube detector (<b>left</b>) and top view of detector strings (<b>right</b>) with eight DC strings (red filled).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>ν</mi> <mi>μ</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> disappearance probability as a function of the energy and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo form="prefix">cos</mo> <mo>(</mo> <msub> <mi>θ</mi> <mi>zenith</mi> </msub> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Training samples for energy (<b>left</b>) and <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>θ</mi> <mi>zenith</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Performance comparison of CNN (blue) and likelihood-based (orange) on reconstruction of (from top left to bottom right) the energy, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>θ</mi> <mi>zenith</mi> </msub> </semantics></math>, PID, and muon classifier, where random represents the baseline performance of particles being randomly assigned to different categories.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Selected sample purity when using CNN (<b>left</b>) and likelihood (<b>right</b>) methods reconstructed interaction vertex; the rows sum to 1, while the numbers corresponds to the fraction of unweighted events.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Preliminary sample in cascade (<b>left</b>), mixed (<b>middle</b>), and track (<b>right</b>) bins with flux, cross-section, and oscillation weights applied; the pink circle highlights the <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>ν</mi> <mi>μ</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> disappearance “valley”.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>MC distribution of CNN-reconstructed PIDs with stacked interaction types (colors) and boundaries used for binning (dashed).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Preliminary sensitivity using CNN reconstruction (black) projected from DeepCore 2021 result (yellow) compared to using likelihood-based reconstruction (red).</p>
Full article ">
7 pages, 1363 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Machine Learning Techniques to Enhance Event Reconstruction in Water Cherenkov Detectors
by Nicholas Prouse, Patrick de Perio and Wojciech Fedorko
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 63; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008063 - 13 Oct 2023
Viewed by 1204
Abstract
Hyper-Kamiokande (Hyper-K) is the next-generation water Cherenkov neutrino experiment, building on the success of its predecessor Super-Kamiokande. To match the increased precision and reduced statistical errors of the new detectors, improvements to event reconstruction and event selection are required to suppress backgrounds and [...] Read more.
Hyper-Kamiokande (Hyper-K) is the next-generation water Cherenkov neutrino experiment, building on the success of its predecessor Super-Kamiokande. To match the increased precision and reduced statistical errors of the new detectors, improvements to event reconstruction and event selection are required to suppress backgrounds and minimise systematic errors. Machine learning has the potential to provide these enhancements, enabling the precision measurements that Hyper-K aims to perform. This paper provides an overview of the areas where machine learning is being explored for Hyper-K’s water Cherenkov detectors. Results using various network architectures are presented, along with comparisons to traditional methods and a discussion of the challenges and future plans for applying machine learning techniques. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Configuration of the cylindrical detector onto a 2D image for CNN. The layout illustration on the left demonstrates how the cylinder is unwrapped onto a 2D surface. Shown on the right, the resulting image is divided into sections outlined by dashed lines, then duplicated and reconfigured into a double cover of the detector surface, with circular boundary conditions indicated by orange arrows.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Results of PID using ResNet (red), PointNet (green), and fiTQun (blue), showing the electron efficiency when requiring 99.9% muon rejection (<b>left</b>) or 80% gamma rejection (<b>right</b>) as a function of the electron’s true momentum.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Results of reconstruction, showing on the (<b>left</b>), the average position resolution as a function of distance from the detector wall for ResNet (red), PointNet (green), and fiTQun (blue); in the (<b>middle</b>), the direction resolution; and on the (<b>right</b>), the energy resolution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Example segmentation of two Cherenkov rings from gammas of a neutral pion decay, showing the simulated charge observed in the detector’s PMTs (<b>left</b>), true segmentation (<b>middle</b>), and reconstructed segmentation using U-Net (<b>right</b>). The true and reconstructed segmentation panels display PMT hits from one gamma coloured red and the other coloured blue; the reversal of colour labels identifying the gammas in the reconstructed segmentation occurs by chance due to the network being trained to segment the rings but not to reproduce their arbitrary ordering.</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 1266 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Structure Functions and Tau Neutrino Cross Section at DUNE Far Detector
by Barbara Yaeggy
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 64; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008064 - 17 Oct 2023
Viewed by 843
Abstract
DUNE’s Argon time-projecting chambers (TPC) detectors will allow us to conduct precise studies about phenomena that have, until now, seemed too challenging to measure, like tau neutrino (ντ) interactions. Cross section measurements are needed to understand how accurate our neutrino-nucleus [...] Read more.
DUNE’s Argon time-projecting chambers (TPC) detectors will allow us to conduct precise studies about phenomena that have, until now, seemed too challenging to measure, like tau neutrino (ντ) interactions. Cross section measurements are needed to understand how accurate our neutrino-nucleus interaction models are and how accurately we can use them to reconstruct neutrino energy. Quasi-elastic scattering (QE), Δ resonance production (RES), and deep inelastic scattering (DIS) processes are known to provide dominant contributions in the medium and high neutrino energy to the total cross-section of ντ(N) and ν¯τ(N). These cross-sections have large systematic uncertainties compared to the ones measured for νμ and νe and their antiparticles. Studies point out that the reason for these differences is due to the model dependence of the ντ(N) cross-sections in treating the nuclear medium effects described by the nucleon structure functions, F1N,,3N(x,Q2) for νμ and νe. These proceedings show the semi-theoretical and experimental approach to the estimation of the ντ(N) and ν¯τ(N) cross-sections in DUNE for the DIS region. We will check the contributions of the additional nucleon structure functions F4N(x,Q2) and F5N(x,Q2) and their dependence on Q2 and Bjorken-x scale. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>Left</b>): in blue, CP-optimized beam, here the design requires a 3 horns configuration; in red, tau-optimized beam, the design requires a 2 horns configuration. This is a future upgrade, and it is under investigation. (<b>Right</b>): Migration matrix for hadronically decaying <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>τ</mi> </semantics></math> leptons produced via <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>ν</mi> <mi>τ</mi> </msub> </semantics></math>-CC interactions. The assumed bias is <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mn>45</mn> <mo>%</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> and the resolution is <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mn>25</mn> <mo>%</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>. No migration exists below <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>E</mi> <mi>ν</mi> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>u</mi> <mi>e</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> <mo>≈</mo> <mn>3.4</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> GeV, as the scattering process is kinematically forbidden, Ref. [<a href="#B3-psf-08-00064" class="html-bibr">3</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>Left</b>): <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>F</mi> <mn>4</mn> </msub> </semantics></math>, the LO curve with <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>M</mi> <mi>N</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> shows that <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>F</mi> <mn>4</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, at NLO, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>F</mi> <mn>4</mn> </msub> <mo>≈</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>%</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> of <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>F</mi> <mn>5</mn> </msub> </semantics></math>; therefore, the AJ relations are good approximations to the NLO result. (<b>Right</b>): <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>F</mi> <mn>5</mn> </msub> </semantics></math>, at LO, AJ relation is violated, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <mi>x</mi> <msub> <mi>F</mi> <mn>5</mn> </msub> <mo>−</mo> <msub> <mi>F</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>≠</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>; this is due to the charm quark mass corrections; NLO corrections have an effect primarily at small-<span class="html-italic">x</span> [<a href="#B6-psf-08-00064" class="html-bibr">6</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>Left</b>), <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>ν</mi> <mi>τ</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> and (<b>right</b>), <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>ν</mi> <mi>τ</mi> </msub> </semantics></math>-CC cross sections. Notice the difference between the cross sections in the <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>F</mi> <mn>4</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>F</mi> <mn>5</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> hypothesis (dashed line) and the standard model prediction (solid line).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>Left</b>): <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>F</mi> <mn>5</mn> </msub> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo>,</mo> <msup> <mi>Q</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math> phase space for the SM prediction. (<b>Right</b>): <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>F</mi> <mn>5</mn> </msub> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo>,</mo> <msup> <mi>Q</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math> phase space for the case when <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>F</mi> <mn>4</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <msub> <mi>F</mi> <mn>5</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, which shows a greater region for nuclear interactions between <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>x</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.2</mn> <mo>−</mo> <mn>0.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>Left</b>): <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>F</mi> <mn>5</mn> </msub> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo>,</mo> <msup> <mi>Q</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math> phase space, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>F</mi> <mn>5</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> is sensitive in values for <span class="html-italic">x</span> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <msup> <mi>Q</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </semantics></math> that wrap different interactions models. (<b>Right</b>): the ratio between having <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>F</mi> <mn>5</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> or <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>F</mi> <mn>5</mn> </msub> <mo>≠</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, this ratio is greater than one, meaning that there is a chance to disentangle an overall normalization change from a scaling of <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>F</mi> <mn>5</mn> </msub> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">
7 pages, 905 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
The Design of the ENUBET Beamline
by E. G. Parozzi, F. Acerbi, I. Angelis, L. Bomben, M. Bonesini, F. Bramati, A. Branca, C. Brizzolari, G. Brunetti, M. Calviani, S. Carturan, M. G. Catanesi, S. Cecchini, N. Charitonidis, F. Cindolo, G. Cogo, G. Collazuol, F. Dal Corso, C. Delogu, G. De Rosa, A. Falcone, B. Goddard, A. Gola, L. Halić, F. Iacob, C. Jollet, V. Kain, A. Kallitsopoulou, B. Klicek, Y. Kudenko, C. Lampoudis, M. Laveder, P. Legou, A. Longhin, L. Ludovici, E. Lutsenko, L. Magaletti, G. Mandrioli, S. Marangoni, A. Margotti, V. Mascagna, N. Mauri, L. Meazza, A. Meregaglia, M. Mezzetto, M. Nessi, A. Paoloni, M. Pari, T. Papaevangelou, L. Pasqualini, G. Paternoster, L. Patrizii, M. Pozzato, M. Prest, F. Pupilli, E. Radicioni, A. C. Ruggeri, D. Sampsonidis, C. Scian, G. Sirri, M. Stipcevic, M. Tenti, F. Terranova, M. Torti, S. E. Tzamarias, E. Vallazza, F. Velotti and L. Votanoadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 65; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008065 - 19 Oct 2023
Viewed by 900
Abstract
The ENUBET project aims to reduce the flux-related systematics to 1% on a narrow band neutrino beam through monitoring the associated charged leptons in an instrumented decay tunnel. A key element of the project is the design of a meson transfer line with [...] Read more.
The ENUBET project aims to reduce the flux-related systematics to 1% on a narrow band neutrino beam through monitoring the associated charged leptons in an instrumented decay tunnel. A key element of the project is the design of a meson transfer line with conventional magnets that maximize the yield of K+ and π+ while minimizing the total length to reduce meson decay outside the instrumented region. In order to limit particle rates in the tunnel instrumentation, a high level of beam collimation is needed, thus allowing non-decayed mesons to reach the end of the tunnel. At the same time, fine-tuning of the shielding and the collimators is required to minimize any beam-induced background in the decay region. The magnetic lattice is optimized with TRANSPORT. The focusing of mesons from the target is performed with a static (quadrupole-based) system that, coupled with a slow proton extraction scheme, allows for a significant pile-up reduction at the tunnel instrumentation while retaining a particle yield large enough for high-precision neutrino cross-section measurements on a 3 year time scale. Charge and momentum selection in an 8.5GeV ± 10% momentum bite is performed by a double dipole system. Shielding elements are optimized with full simulation of the facility in Geant4. In particular, a powerful genetic algorithm is used to scan the parameter space of the collimators automatically in order to find a configuration that minimizes the halo background in the decay tunnel while preserving a large meson yield. This contribution will report the results of the optimization studies and the final design of the ENUBET beamline, together with dose estimation through a FLUKA simulation. The design of an alternative secondary beamline with a broad momentum range (4, 6, and 8.5 GeV/c) that could enhance the physics reach of the facility is additionally discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Kaon yields as a function of the graphite target length. A primary beam with 400 GeV/c momentum was used to evaluate the targets. The number of kaons of a given energy that enter and are transported along the beamline with <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>±</mo> <mn>20</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> mrad angular acceptance in both planes is the figure of merit for this study. Monte Carlo systematics are generally in the order of ∼10% and the simulated statistical errors are small (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>%</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>); thus, the error bars are not plotted to ease interpretation of the plot. Blue is 4 GeV/c, green is 6 GeV/c, and red is 8.5 GeV/c in terms of kaon momenta, whilst the marker style indicates the target radius: a dot is 10 mm, a square is 15mm, a cross is 20mm, and a star is 25mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Baseline layout of the G4Beamline showing the main stages of the line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Schematics of the last two collimators placed upstream of the tagger (<b>on the left</b>) and convergence plot of the beamline iterations to maximize the FOM (<b>on the right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Horizontal (<b>top</b>) and vertical (<b>bottom</b>) planes of the beamline optics. The R-matrix parameters are represented graphically by each line; the blue line corresponds to dispersive rays, the red line to angular rays, and the green line to cosine-like rays. The beam is set to have a smooth focus in both planes toward the decay tunnel.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>“Multi-momentum” beamline layout in the G4Beamline with the magnetic elements and the appearing collimating structures.</p>
Full article ">
5 pages, 555 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Oscillation and Decay of Neutrinos in Matter: An Analytic Treatment
by Dibya S. Chattopadhyay, Kaustav Chakraborty, Amol Dighe and Srubabati Goswami
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 66; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008066 - 30 Oct 2023
Viewed by 579
Abstract
We present compact analytic expressions for neutrino propagation probabilities in matter, with effects from the invisible decay of the ν3 mass eigenstate included. These will be directly relevant for long-baseline experiments. The inclusion of decay leads to a non-Hermitian effective Hamiltonian, with [...] Read more.
We present compact analytic expressions for neutrino propagation probabilities in matter, with effects from the invisible decay of the ν3 mass eigenstate included. These will be directly relevant for long-baseline experiments. The inclusion of decay leads to a non-Hermitian effective Hamiltonian, with the Hermitian part corresponding to oscillation, and the anti-Hermitian part representing the decay. In the presence of matter, the two components invariably become non-commuting. We employ the Cayley–Hamilton theorem to calculate the neutrino oscillation probabilities in constant density matter. The analytic results obtained provide a physical understanding of the possible effects of neutrino decay on these probabilities. Certain non-intuitive features like an increase in the survival probability P(νμνμ) at its oscillation dips may be explained using our analytic expressions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The top panels show the probabilities <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mrow> <mi>μ</mi> <mi>e</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mrow> <mi>μ</mi> <mi>μ</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> with <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>γ</mi> <mn>3</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, for <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>L</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1300</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> km, for the analytic expressions mentioned in these Proceedings, as well as for the One Mass Scale Dominance (OMSD) approximation [<a href="#B4-psf-08-00066" class="html-bibr">4</a>]. The bottom panels show the absolute accuracy <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mrow> <mo>|</mo> <mo mathvariant="sans-serif">Δ</mo> </mrow> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> <mi>β</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mrow> <mo>|</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math> of these approximations. The thick (thin) curves indicate positive (negative) signs of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo mathvariant="sans-serif">Δ</mo> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> <mi>β</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>. The figure is taken from [<a href="#B4-psf-08-00066" class="html-bibr">4</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The survival probability <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mrow> <mi>μ</mi> <mi>μ</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> at the first (<b>left</b>) and the second (<b>right</b>) oscillation dips <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mo mathvariant="sans-serif">Δ</mo> <mo>=</mo> <mstyle scriptlevel="0" displaystyle="false"> <mfrac> <mi>π</mi> <mn>2</mn> </mfrac> </mstyle> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="0.166667em"/> <mstyle scriptlevel="0" displaystyle="false"> <mfrac> <mrow> <mn>3</mn> <mi>π</mi> </mrow> <mn>2</mn> </mfrac> </mstyle> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> for a range of baselines <span class="html-italic">L</span>, with <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>θ</mi> <mn>23</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <msup> <mn>45</mn> <mo>∘</mo> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>γ</mi> <mn>3</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. The figure is taken from [<a href="#B4-psf-08-00066" class="html-bibr">4</a>].</p>
Full article ">
9 pages, 12044 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Neutrino Oscillations and CP Violation with the European Spallation Source Neutrino Super Beam
by Marcos Dracos
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 67; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008067 - 31 Oct 2023
Viewed by 612
Abstract
The European project ESSνSB, after a four-year feasibility study, has demonstrated that a neutrino facility based on the European Spallation Source and operated at the second oscillation maximum is not only compatible with the under construction neutron facility, but it also [...] Read more.
The European project ESSνSB, after a four-year feasibility study, has demonstrated that a neutrino facility based on the European Spallation Source and operated at the second oscillation maximum is not only compatible with the under construction neutron facility, but it also has a very high physics performance in the sector of discovery of CP violation in the leptonic sector and measurement of the CP-violating phase with high precision. This has been obtained by well optimising all parts of this neutrino facility going from the ESS proton linac up to the location of the neutrino far detector. Here, a summary of all these efforts based on the already published Conceptual Design Report is reported. A continuation of this work has recently been approved by EU. This new project includes investigations of implementation of low energy nuSTORM and ENUBET for cross-section measurements and sterile neutrino searches. Both options use mainly muons produced together with neutrinos. This “muon” orientation gives a new dimension to the project, enhancing its probability to be approved in the future. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>ESS proton linac.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>ESS<math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>ν</mi> </semantics></math>SB layout on top of the ESS facility.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Proton switchyard, target station, decay tunnel and beam dump.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Neutrino spectrum for positive horn polarity (neutrino mode).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Neutrino spectrum for negative horn polarity (antineutrino mode).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>ESS<math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>ν</mi> </semantics></math>SB near detector.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>ESS<math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>ν</mi> </semantics></math>SB far water Cherenkov detector (cylinder with 78 m diameter and 78 m height).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>CP violation discovery significance versus <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>δ</mi> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> <mi>P</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>CP violation discovery significance versus <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>δ</mi> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> <mi>P</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> fraction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Fraction of <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>δ</mi> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> <mi>P</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> covered at 5 <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>σ</mi> </semantics></math> versus data taking time.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Precision on <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>δ</mi> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> <mi>P</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> versus <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>δ</mi> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> <mi>P</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Momentum distribution for muons collected at 25 m, 50 m and 100 m from the target.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Layout of ESS<math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>ν</mi> </semantics></math>SB+ facility with the “low power” target station (yellow) followed by the low energy nuSTORM ring (red) and LEMNB (low energy ENUBET) decay tunnel.</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 1846 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Beyond the Standard Model New Physics Searches with SBND
by Supraja Balasubramanian
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 68; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008068 - 8 Nov 2023
Viewed by 681
Abstract
SBND (Short-Baseline Near Detector) is a 112-ton liquid argon time projection chamber located on the Booster Neutrino Beam at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, and is the near detector of the Short-Baseline Neutrino program. The primary goals of SBND are to provide flux constraints [...] Read more.
SBND (Short-Baseline Near Detector) is a 112-ton liquid argon time projection chamber located on the Booster Neutrino Beam at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, and is the near detector of the Short-Baseline Neutrino program. The primary goals of SBND are to provide flux constraints for sterile neutrino searches, conduct world-leading neutrino cross-section measurements on argon, and perform Beyond the Standard Model (BSM) new physics searches with its high-precision particle identification capabilities. SBND’s prospects and tools for detecting a variety of BSM phenomena produced in a neutrino beam, such as sub-GeV dark matter, dark neutrinos, heavy neutral leptons and millicharged particles, are discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Booster Neutrino Beam flux at SBND.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The SBND time projection chambers with photon detection system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>A schematic of the Booster Neutrino Beam showing charged and neutral meson production (<b>left</b>). Different off-axis angles (ranging from 0 to 1.8 degrees) for obtaining different neutrino energy spectra in SBND PRISM (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>SBND’s preliminary projected sensitivity in millicharged particle phase space.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The timing structure of the BNB via light production: the light reconstruction is able to resolve the neutrino “bucket” structure of the beam spill (<b>left</b>). A preliminary estimate of different accessible areas of heavy neutral lepton phase space by SBND (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">
5 pages, 1680 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
ESS Neutrino Super Beam ESSνSB Design and Performance for Precision Measurements of the Leptonic CP Violating Phase δCP
by Tord Ekelöf
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 69; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008069 - 28 Nov 2023
Viewed by 571
Abstract
A design study ESSνSB was carried out during the years 2018–2021 concerning how the five MW linear proton accelerators of the European Spallation Source, which are currently under construction in Lund, Sweden, can be used to generate a world-unique, intense neutrino Super Beam [...] Read more.
A design study ESSνSB was carried out during the years 2018–2021 concerning how the five MW linear proton accelerators of the European Spallation Source, which are currently under construction in Lund, Sweden, can be used to generate a world-unique, intense neutrino Super Beam for precision measurements of the leptonic CP violating phase δCP. As there are definite limits, which are related to uncertainties in neutrino–nucleus interaction modeling, to how far the systematic errors in such measurements can be reduced, the method chosen in this project is to make the measurements at the second oscillation maximum, where the CP violation signal is close to three times larger than at the first, whereas the systematic errors are approximately the same at the two maxima. As the second maximum is located three times further away from the neutrino source than the first maximum, a higher neutrino beam intensity and thus a higher proton driver power are required when measuring at the second maximum. The unique high power of the ESS proton linac will allow for the measurements to be made at the second maximum and thereby for the most precise measurements of the leptonic CP violation phase δCP to be made. This paper describes the results of the work made on the conceptual design of ESSνSB layout, infrastructure, and components as well as the evaluation of the physics performance for leptonic CP violation discovery and, in particular, the precision in the measurement of δCP. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Layout of the ESSνSB project showing the ESS proton linac, which will accelerate 14 additional 2.86 ms long H<sup>−</sup> ion pulses per second, interleaved with the ordinary proton pulses, which will be transferred to the accumulator ring where they will be stripped of their electrons at the injection point. The resulting proton pulses will be accumulated in the ring and then extracted in one turn, forming 1.3 μs short pulses that will be directed toward the target station, where they will produce a high flux of pi mesons. The neutrino beams resulting from the pi meson decay in the decay tunnel downstream of the target will be monitored by the near detector, and the neutrino flavor oscillations will be measured in the beam by the far detector, located 360 km from ESS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Diagrams showing to the top left the ESSνSB performance for leptonic CP violation discovery in terms of number of signal standard deviations for different values of the CP violating phase angle δ<sub>CP</sub> in degrees, in top right the precision in degrees with which δ<sub>CP</sub> can be measured as function of δ<sub>CP</sub>, and at the bottom the same quantity as function of experimental run time in years. In all three plots, a systematic error of 5% has been conservatively assumed.</p>
Full article ">
8 pages, 2328 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Searches for Dark Matter in the Galactic Halo and Extragalactic Sources with IceCube
by Minjin Jeong
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 70; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008070 - 5 Dec 2023
Viewed by 675
Abstract
Although there is overwhelming evidence for the existence of dark matter, the nature of dark matter remains largely unknown. Neutrino telescopes are powerful tools to search indirectly for dark matter, through the detection of neutrinos produced during dark matter decay or annihilation processes. [...] Read more.
Although there is overwhelming evidence for the existence of dark matter, the nature of dark matter remains largely unknown. Neutrino telescopes are powerful tools to search indirectly for dark matter, through the detection of neutrinos produced during dark matter decay or annihilation processes. The IceCube Neutrino Observatory is a cubic-kilometer-scale neutrino telescope located under 1.5 km of ice near the Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station. Various dark matter searches were performed with IceCube over the last decade, providing strong constraints on dark matter models. In this contribution, we present the latest results from IceCube as well as ongoing analyses using IceCube data, focusing on the works that look at the Galactic Halo, nearby galaxies, and galaxy clusters. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p><b>Upper limits (90% C.L.) on the velocity-averaged dark matter self-annihilation cross-section.</b> Left panel shows the limits obtained from the HESE 7.5-year analysis for the considered dark matter annihilation channels and the Einasto halo model. In the right panel, the limits for the <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msup> <mi>μ</mi> <mo>+</mo> </msup> <msup> <mi>μ</mi> <mo>−</mo> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math> channel are compared with limits from other experiments [<a href="#B19-psf-08-00070" class="html-bibr">19</a>,<a href="#B20-psf-08-00070" class="html-bibr">20</a>,<a href="#B21-psf-08-00070" class="html-bibr">21</a>,<a href="#B22-psf-08-00070" class="html-bibr">22</a>,<a href="#B23-psf-08-00070" class="html-bibr">23</a>,<a href="#B24-psf-08-00070" class="html-bibr">24</a>]. These plots are taken from [<a href="#B16-psf-08-00070" class="html-bibr">16</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p><b>Lower limits (90% C.L.) on the dark matter lifetime.</b> Left panel shows the limits obtained from the HESE 7.5-year analysis for the considered dark matter decay channels and the Einasto halo model. In the right panel, the limits obtained for the <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msup> <mi>μ</mi> <mo>+</mo> </msup> <msup> <mi>μ</mi> <mo>−</mo> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math> channel are compared with limits from other experiments [<a href="#B19-psf-08-00070" class="html-bibr">19</a>,<a href="#B20-psf-08-00070" class="html-bibr">20</a>,<a href="#B21-psf-08-00070" class="html-bibr">21</a>,<a href="#B22-psf-08-00070" class="html-bibr">22</a>,<a href="#B23-psf-08-00070" class="html-bibr">23</a>,<a href="#B24-psf-08-00070" class="html-bibr">24</a>]. These plots are taken from Reference [<a href="#B16-psf-08-00070" class="html-bibr">16</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p><b>Credible upper limits (90%) on the maximum dark matter–neutrino coupling strength, obtained from the HESE 7.5-year analysis.</b> Left panel shows the limits for fermionic dark matter with a vector mediator scenario. Right panel shows the limits for the scalar dark matter with a fermionic mediator scenario. In each of the panels, the limits are shown as a function of the mediator mass (<math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>m</mi> <mi>ϕ</mi> </msub> </semantics></math>) and dark matter mass (<math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>m</mi> <mi>χ</mi> </msub> </semantics></math>). The pink line separates the regions of parameter space where cosmology or IceCube gives stronger bounds. The plots are taken from Reference [<a href="#B16-psf-08-00070" class="html-bibr">16</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p><b>Limits on the velocity-averaged dark matter self-annihilation cross-section (left panel) and the dark matter lifetime (right panel).</b> The solid lines represent the limits obtained from the Neutrino Line analysis at 90% confidence level. They are compared with limits from other neutrino experiments [<a href="#B6-psf-08-00070" class="html-bibr">6</a>,<a href="#B9-psf-08-00070" class="html-bibr">9</a>,<a href="#B10-psf-08-00070" class="html-bibr">10</a>,<a href="#B24-psf-08-00070" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B27-psf-08-00070" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B28-psf-08-00070" class="html-bibr">28</a>]. The plots are taken from Reference [<a href="#B26-psf-08-00070" class="html-bibr">26</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p><b>Sensitivities (90% C.L.) of the low-energy Galactic Center analysis to the velocity-averaged dark matter self-annihilation cross-section.</b> Left panel presents the sensitivities calculated for the considered dark matter annihilation channels and the NFW halo model. Right panel shows the sensitivities for the <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msup> <mi>τ</mi> <mo>+</mo> </msup> <msup> <mi>τ</mi> <mo>−</mo> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math> channel compared with limits from other neutrino experiments [<a href="#B10-psf-08-00070" class="html-bibr">10</a>,<a href="#B11-psf-08-00070" class="html-bibr">11</a>,<a href="#B29-psf-08-00070" class="html-bibr">29</a>]. The plots are taken from [<a href="#B26-psf-08-00070" class="html-bibr">26</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p><b>Sensitivities of the extragalactic decaying dark matter analysis to the dark matter lifetime.</b> The solid lines represent the sensitivities of the analysis, calculated at 90% confidence level. The other lines are limits from recent IceCube and HAWC analyses [<a href="#B16-psf-08-00070" class="html-bibr">16</a>,<a href="#B23-psf-08-00070" class="html-bibr">23</a>,<a href="#B24-psf-08-00070" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B35-psf-08-00070" class="html-bibr">35</a>,<a href="#B36-psf-08-00070" class="html-bibr">36</a>,<a href="#B37-psf-08-00070" class="html-bibr">37</a>]. The confidence levels associated with the IceCube and HAWC limits are 90% and 95%, respectively.</p>
Full article ">
4 pages, 15553 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Three-Dimensional Visualization of Astronomy Data Using Virtual Reality
by Gilles Ferrand
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 71; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008071 - 5 Dec 2023
Viewed by 848
Abstract
Visualization is an essential part of research, both to explore one’s data and to communicate one’s findings with others. Many data products in astronomy come in the form of multi-dimensional cubes, and since our brains are tuned for recognition in a 3D world, [...] Read more.
Visualization is an essential part of research, both to explore one’s data and to communicate one’s findings with others. Many data products in astronomy come in the form of multi-dimensional cubes, and since our brains are tuned for recognition in a 3D world, we ought to display and manipulate these in 3D space. This is possible with virtual reality (VR) devices. Drawing from our experiments developing immersive and interactive 3D experiences from actual science data at the Astrophysical Big Bang Laboratory (ABBL), this paper gives an overview of the opportunities and challenges that are awaiting astrophysicists in the burgeoning VR space. It covers both software and hardware matters, as well as practical aspects for successful delivery to the public. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Collage of photos taken at the ABBL booth during RIKEN Open Day 2019. At the <b>top left</b> and <b>top right</b> one can see a snapshot of the evolution of the supernova remnant (volume-rendered); the <b>top center</b> panel shows the user interface to select iso-contours of elemental abundances in the supernova (meshes). Even though a flat display cannot convey the VR experience, having a monitor in the room is important so that everyone can have an idea of what is going on inside the headset. The <b>bottom right</b> photo illustrates the flow of the demo: on-boarding using info sheet, the VR navigation per se, and the questions/feedback corner.</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 515 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Development of a Clock Generation and Time Distribution System for Hyper-Kamiokande
by Lucile Mellet, Mathieu Guigue, Boris Popov, Stefano Russo and Vincent Voisin
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 72; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008072 - 18 Jan 2024
Viewed by 785
Abstract
The construction of the next-generation water Cherenkov detector Hyper-Kamiokande (HK) has started. It will have about a ten times larger fiducial volume compared to the existing Super-Kamiokande detector, as well as increased detection performances. The data collection process is planned from 2027 onwards. [...] Read more.
The construction of the next-generation water Cherenkov detector Hyper-Kamiokande (HK) has started. It will have about a ten times larger fiducial volume compared to the existing Super-Kamiokande detector, as well as increased detection performances. The data collection process is planned from 2027 onwards. Time stability is crucial, as detecting physics events relies on reconstructing Cherenkov rings based on the coincidence between the photomultipliers. The above requires a distributed clock jitter at each endpoint that is smaller than 100 ps. In addition, since this detector will be mainly used to detect neutrinos produced by the J-PARC accelerator in Tokai, each event needs to be timed-tagged with a precision better than 100 ns, with respect to UTC, in order to be associated with a proton spill from J-PARC or the events observed in other detectors for multi-messenger astronomy. The HK collaboration is in an R&D phase and several groups are working in parallel for the electronics system. This proceeding will present the studies performed at LPNHE (Paris) related to a novel design for the time synchronization system in Kamioka with respect to the previous KamiokaNDE series of experiments. We will discuss the clock generation, including the connection scheme between the GNSS receiver (Septentrio) and the atomic clock (free-running Rubidium), the precise calibration of the atomic clock and algorithms to account for errors on satellites orbits, the redundancy of the system, and a two-stage distribution system that sends the clock and various timing-sensitive information to each front-end electronics module, using a custom protocol. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Detailed scheme of the proposed timing system for HK (redundancy not included).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Overlapping Allan standard deviation (ADEV) for the free Rb clock and the GNSS receiver.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Evolution of time differences between the Rubidium clock (deterministic drift removed) and French UTC via GPS signals over 6 days.</p>
Full article ">
8 pages, 2751 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
NuMI Beam Monitoring Simulation and Data Analysis
by Yiding Yu, Thomas Joseph Carroll, Sudeshna Ganguly, Karol Lang, Eduardo Ossorio, Pavel Snopok, Jennifer Thomas, Don Athula Wickremasinghe and Katsuya Yonehara
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 8(1), 73; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2023008073 - 22 Apr 2024
Viewed by 603
Abstract
Following the decommissioning of the Main Injector Neutrino Oscillation Search (MINOS) experiment, muon and hadron monitors have emerged as vital diagnostic tools for the NuMI Off-axis νμ Appearance (NOvA) experiment at Fermilab. These tools are crucial for overseeing the Neutrinos at the [...] Read more.
Following the decommissioning of the Main Injector Neutrino Oscillation Search (MINOS) experiment, muon and hadron monitors have emerged as vital diagnostic tools for the NuMI Off-axis νμ Appearance (NOvA) experiment at Fermilab. These tools are crucial for overseeing the Neutrinos at the Main Injector (NuMI) beam. This study endeavors to ensure the monitor signal quality and to correlate them with the Neutrino beam profile. Leveraging muon monitor simulations, we systematically explore the monitor responses to variations in proton-beam and lattice parameters. Through the amalgamation of individual pixel data from muon monitors, pattern-recognition algorithms, simulations, and measured data, we devise machine-learning-based models to predict muon monitor responses and Neutrino flux. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 23rd International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic of the NuMI beamline [<a href="#B3-psf-08-00073" class="html-bibr">3</a>] featuring three muon monitors and two magnetic horns.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Two−dimensional histogram at MM1. On the (<b>left</b>) (simulation), pixels indicate event counts divided by <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>×</mo> <msup> <mn>10</mn> <mn>5</mn> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>. On the (<b>right</b>) (measurement), pixels display voltage signals normalized to beam intensity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The plot illustrates the muon momentum spectra for MM1 pixels, organized in a central row (X1–X9) and column (Y1–Y9). Noticeable is the shift of peaks to lower momentum as one moves from the center to the edge. Different color lines in the right plots represent spectra for distinct pixels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Slopes of muon beam position at MM1 to MM3 plotted against proton−beam position on the target, comparing data and simulation results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparison of MM1 pixels for normalized voltage signals and muon event counts across varying horizontal target beam positions. Blue represents data, while red indicates simulation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Model of Horn1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Two-dimensional histograms of ratios (muon events) at MM1–3 for tilt angle −3 mrads (<b>top</b>) and −3 mrads (<b>bottom</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Ratios of pixels vs. target vertical offset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Pixel map of muon monitors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Circles indicate differences exceeding 3 sigma at certain pixels, while crosses represent differences within 3 sigma. Here, sigma is the difference in the simulation divided by the statistical error of the simulation.</p>
Full article ">
Previous Issue
Back to TopTop