Silicon Nanowire-Supported Catalysts for the Photocatalytic Reduction of Carbon Dioxide †
1
Clean Energy Technologies Research Institute (CETRI), Process Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Regina, 3737 Wascana Parkway, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada
2
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Toronto, 184 College Street, Toronto, ON M5S 3E4, Canada
3
Solar Fuels Group, Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, 80 St. George Street, Toronto, ON M5S 3H6, Canada
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Presented at the 1st International Conference on Industrial, Manufacturing, and Process Engineering (ICIMP-2024), Regina, Canada, 27–29 June 2024.
Eng. Proc. 2024, 76(1), 81; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024076081
Published: 15 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Industrial, Manufacturing, and Process Engineering (ICIMP-2024))
Download keyboard_arrow_down
Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) SEM images of the α-FeOOH@SiNWs catalyst and those of the (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) β-FeOOH@SiNWs catalyst.</p> "> Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) SEM images of the Cu@SiNWs catalyst.</p> "> Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) SEM images of the Ni@SiNWs catalyst and that of (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) Ni/NiO@SiNWs catalyst.</p> "> Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Band structure of silicon nanowires with respect to fermi energy level of the nickel catalyst; (<b>b</b>) band structure of silicon nanowires with respect to that of nickel oxide; (<b>c</b>) valence and conduction band positions of silicon and nickel oxide with respect to the fermi position of metallic nickel.</p> "> Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) SEM image of the RuO<sub>2</sub>@SiNWs catalyst; (<b>b</b>) TEM image of the RuO<sub>2</sub>@SiNWs catalyst. XPS showing (<b>c</b>) the 3d and (<b>d</b>) the O1s spectrum of the RuO<sub>2</sub>@SiNWs catalyst.</p> "> Figure 6
<p>The photocatalytic performance comparisons of α-FeOOH@SiNWs, β-FeOOH@SiNWs, Cu@SiNWs, Ni/NiO@SiNWs, and RuO<sub>2</sub>@SiNWs catalysts towards CO<sub>2</sub> reduction.</p> ">
Versions Notes
<p>(<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) SEM images of the α-FeOOH@SiNWs catalyst and those of the (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) β-FeOOH@SiNWs catalyst.</p> "> Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) SEM images of the Cu@SiNWs catalyst.</p> "> Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) SEM images of the Ni@SiNWs catalyst and that of (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) Ni/NiO@SiNWs catalyst.</p> "> Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Band structure of silicon nanowires with respect to fermi energy level of the nickel catalyst; (<b>b</b>) band structure of silicon nanowires with respect to that of nickel oxide; (<b>c</b>) valence and conduction band positions of silicon and nickel oxide with respect to the fermi position of metallic nickel.</p> "> Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) SEM image of the RuO<sub>2</sub>@SiNWs catalyst; (<b>b</b>) TEM image of the RuO<sub>2</sub>@SiNWs catalyst. XPS showing (<b>c</b>) the 3d and (<b>d</b>) the O1s spectrum of the RuO<sub>2</sub>@SiNWs catalyst.</p> "> Figure 6
<p>The photocatalytic performance comparisons of α-FeOOH@SiNWs, β-FeOOH@SiNWs, Cu@SiNWs, Ni/NiO@SiNWs, and RuO<sub>2</sub>@SiNWs catalysts towards CO<sub>2</sub> reduction.</p> ">
Abstract
:The conversion of carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas, into valuable chemicals using sunlight is highly significant technologically and holds the promise of providing a more sustainable alternative to fossil fuels. To effectively utilize the abundant solar irradiation, it is essential to develop catalysts that can absorb a significant portion of the solar spectrum, particularly in the UV, visible, and infrared regions. Silicon nanowire arrays grown on silicon substrates meet this criterion, as they can absorb over 85% of solar irradiation and show minimal reflective losses across the UV, visible, and infrared portions of the solar spectrum. Herein, we report the deposition of various catalysts, including iron oxyhydroxides, copper, nickel, and ruthenium, on silicon nanowires using different catalyst deposition techniques. The photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide was evaluated using these catalysts. The results show that silicon nanowires coated with nickel and ruthenium oxide had the highest activity towards the photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide, with photomethanation rates reaching 546 μmolgcat−1h−1 for RuO2@SiNWs and 278 μmolgcat−1h−1 for Ni/NiO@SiNWs. Continued improvement of photocatalysts using nanostructured silicon supports could enable the development of solar refineries for converting gas-phase CO2 into value-added chemicals and fuels.
1. Introduction
The concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere, mainly due to the combustion of fossil fuels, is rapidly rising and has reached unprecedented levels over the last decade. As global fossil fuel consumption increases, CO2 emissions are expected to continue climbing to potentially hazardous levels for life on Earth. To address this, researchers have explored the production of solar fuels, a process that uses sunlight to drive the chemical reaction between CO2 and water to produce useful fuels such as methanol, dimethyl ether, carbon monoxide, or methane [1,2,3]. If this process can be carried out with high technological efficiency, on a global scale, and at a cost that competes with fossil fuels, achieving a sustainable future becomes a realistic objective. This process requires the development of photoactive materials that can harness the abundant solar energy from the sun. This means the catalyst should be capable of absorbing a significant portion of the solar spectrum, particularly visible light [4]. One such material is silicon, particularly in its nanostructured form as silicon nanowires (SiNWs). Due to their unique structural, optical, and electronic properties, SiNWs have garnered significant interest as the material of choice in energy conversion and storage applications, including photovoltaics, thermoelectrics, and photocatalysis. Additionally, silicon is earth-abundant, low-cost, and scalable. Furthermore, with a band gap of 1.1 eV, SiNWs have broad-band and efficient solar spectral harvesting properties, traversing the near-infrared, visible, and ultraviolet wavelength range, and can be tailored to absorb over 85% of the solar irradiance [5]. In particular, when silicon nanowire arrays are produced from vertically etched silicon wafers, they allow for very low reflective losses across the solar spectral wavelength range [6]. However, SiNWs on their own have been shown not to catalyze CO2 reduction reactions [6]. As a result, different catalysts are deposited onto the SiNWs that can efficiently transform CO2 into useful products [7,8]. In this architecture, the SiNW arrays serve two purposes: to absorb most of the visible spectral range and to transport electronic charge to co-catalysts deposited on them to catalyze the chemical transformation of CO2. Herein, we describe the fabrication of vertically aligned SiNW arrays, which is accomplished by the use of a fast, cheap, and room-temperature synthetic route known as metal-assisted chemical etching (MaCE) of silicon [9]. We then use these SiNW arrays to deposit a variety of photocatalysts employed for the photocatalytic conversion of CO2 into useful chemical fuels and feedstocks.
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials
Silicon wafers (University wafers, 1–100 Ω/cm), ethanol (99.8%), acetone (99.5%), deionized water, sulphuric acid (99.99%), hydrofluoric acid (48%HF), silver nitrate (AgNO3) (99.0%), nitric acid (HNO3) (60%), Fe2(SO4)3 (97%), and FeCl3 (99.9%).
2.2. Silicon Nanowire Fabrication
Silicon nanowire arrays were fabricated using a top-down fabrication technique known as metal-assisted chemical etching (MaCE), as previously reported [10,11]. Briefly, p-type silicon wafers were cut into 1-inch squares and cleaned with ethanol, acetone, and deionized water. The wafers were further cleaned by soaking in piranha solution (H2SO4:H2O2 = 3:1 by volume) for 3 h and then rinsed with deionized water. To fabricate the silicon nanowires, the cleaned wafers were immersed in 23 mL of an etching solution consisting of 5 M HF and 0.02 M AgNO3 (VWR redi-pak) and allowed to etch for 1 h at room temperature. After etching, the sample was removed from the etching solution, and the silver dendrites covering the silicon nanowires were washed off with deionized water. To ensure complete removal of the silver nanoparticles and dendrites, the etched wafers were placed in concentrated nitric acid (18 M HNO3) for 1 h. The wafers were then washed, dried, and cut into 1 cm2 pieces. The different catalysts were deposited onto the silicon nanowire substrates through different techniques, as discussed in Section 3.
2.3. Catalyst Characterizations
Scanning and transmission electron microscopy were used to study the morphology and structure of the samples. A Hitachi S-5200 SEM was employed to examine the surface topography of the samples, while a Hitachi H-3300 TEM operating at a voltage of 300 kV was utilized for further characterization. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were conducted to analyze the surface and electronic structure of the samples. XPS was performed in an ultrahigh vacuum chamber with a base pressure of 10−9 mTorr. The system used a Thermo Scientific Kα XPS spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA), equipped with an Al Kα X-ray source operating at 12 kV and 6 A, with an X-ray energy of 1486.7 eV. The spectra were acquired with an analyzer pass energy of 50 eV and an energy spacing of 0.1 eV. All data analysis was carried out using Thermo Scientific AvantageTM V6 software.
2.4. Photocatalytic Measurements
The performance of the catalysts for the photocatalytic reduction of CO2 was evaluated using a custom-built photoreactor system. The reactor used is a 6.5 mL stainless steel vessel designed to hold a 1” by 1” (6.45 cm2) sample. The samples are placed in the photoreactor and the reactor, which operates at a temperature of 80 °C. Initially, the reactor is evacuated to remove any pre-existing gasses, then carbon dioxide and hydrogen gasses are injected. During the photocatalytic reaction, the samples are illuminated with a 400 W metal halide bulb. The concentrations of the products are determined by sampling the product gasses using either gas chromatography (GC) or combined gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS).
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Synthesis and the Characterizations of the Silicon Nanowire-Supported Catalysts
Various catalysts have been deposited onto silicon nanowires to create hybrid catalysts capable of driving the photocatalytic conversion of carbon dioxide into useful solar fuels. These catalysts include iron oxyhydroxide (FeOOH), copper, nickel, and ruthenium, as discussed in the subsequent sections.
3.1.1. Iron Oxyhydroxide/Silicon Nanowire Catalysts
Both α-FeOOH and β-FeOOH polymorphs were successfully grown onto the silicon nanowire substrate through a hydrothermal synthetic technique to produce α-FeOOH@SiNWs and β-FeOOH@SiNWs, respectively. An Fe2(SO4)3 precursor was used to grow the α-FeOOH on the SiNWs, while an FeCl3 precursor was used to grow the β-FeOOH on the SiNWs. To synthesize the α-FeOOH, 350 mg of Fe2(SO4)3 was placed in 20 mL of water, stirred, and sonicated until completely dissolved. The solution was poured into an autoclave containing a silicon nanowire substrate at the bottom. It was then heated for 6 h at 125 °C to produce α-FeOOH@SiNWs. The same procedure was used to grow the β-FeOOH onto the SiNWs, except an FeCl3 precursor was used instead of Fe2(SO4)3, and the solution was heated for 2 h at 125 °C instead of 6 h as the hydrothermal synthesis of β-FeOOH is a lot faster than that of α-FeOOH. The α-FeOOH@SiNWs and β-FeOOH@SiNWs catalysts are shown in Figure 1. While the morphology of the α-FeOOH of the α-FeOOH@SiNWs catalyst consists of a mixture of nanoparticles and nanorods (Figure 1a,b), that of the β-FeOOH of the β-FeOOH@SiNWs catalyst consists of rice-like nanoparticles (Figure 1c,d).
3.1.2. Copper/Silicon Nanowire Catalysts
Copper nanoparticles were deposited onto the SiNWs using an electroless deposition technique. This process involves the chemical reduction of copper ions from a solution onto the surface of SiNWs in the presence of a reducing agent. Specifically, a 1” by 1” (6.45 cm²) silicon wafer, etched at the top to form SiNWs, was immersed in a solution containing copper chloride (0.15 M) and HF (0.05 M) for 30 s. Finally, the plate was rinsed with deionized water and dried in atmospheric air. Figure 2a shows the top view, while Figure 2b shows the side view of the Cu@SiNWs samples produced. Various copper deposition times were tested, but a 30 s deposition provided sufficient and uniform copper coverage, resulting in an optimal CO2 photoreduction rate.
3.1.3. Nickel/Silicon Nanowire Catalysts
For the synthesis of Ni@SiNWs catalysts, nickel nanoparticles were deposited onto SiNWs using a solution of NiCl2 precursor. Briefly, 20 mg of NiCl2 was dissolved in 20 mL of water, and then 0.2 mL (0.015 M) of hydrazine was added. The solution was stirred and heated to 50 °C. SiNW substrates were placed in the solution for 15 min, resulting in the formation of Ni@SiNWs catalysts, as shown in Figure 3a,b.
The samples were then calcined at 300 °C for an hour, leading to the oxidation of some nickel nanoparticles to nickel oxide. This process resulted in the production of a Ni/NiO@SiNWs hybrid catalyst, as shown in Figure 3c,d. This heterojunction architecture of Ni/NiO@SiNWs was found to facilitate efficient CO2 photoreduction due to favorable electron flow facilitated by the positions of the silicon and NiO band gaps relative to the fermi energy of the metallic nickel illustrated in Figure 4. In a heterojunction comprising a metal and a p-type semiconductor—nickel and nickel oxide in this case—at the interface, the Fermi energy level of the nickel will align with that of the nickel oxide. This alignment causes band bending between the nickel and the nickel oxide, facilitating electron transfer from the nickel oxide to the nickel metal, as depicted in Figure 4a. Figure 4b illustrates the band structure of silicon and nickel oxide relative to the Fermi energy position of metallic nickel. In the Ni/NiO/Si heterostructure, such as in Ni/NiO@SiNWs, the alignment of the Fermi levels of the three components enables a cascade of electrons from the nickel oxide to the silicon and finally to the metallic nickel, where the carbon dioxide reduction reaction occurs (Figure 4c). Heterostructures not only facilitate electron transfers but also create charge separation junctions, allowing for the effective separation of electron-hole pairs, thereby providing sufficient time for surface reactions to occur.
3.1.4. Ruthenium Oxide/Silicon Nanowire Catalysts
The deposition of RuO2 on the silicon nanowires was achieved using a wet chemical deposition method. Initially, the SiNWs sample was immersed in a 48% hydrogen fluoride solution for 1–2 min to remove any SiO2 from the surface and to terminate the surface with hydrogen. The hydrogen-terminated samples were placed in a solution containing 30 mg of ruthenium (III) nitrosyl chloride hydrate (RuCl3NO.H2O) dissolved in 40 mL of water. This solution was heated in a water bath at 40–45 °C, and three to five drops of hydrazine were added to facilitate the reduction of ruthenium and the formation of RuO2 on the SiNWs substrate. The resulting RuO2@SiNWs catalyst is shown in Figure 5a. The RuO2 nanoparticles coated on the SiNWs were extremely small, ranging from 2 to 5 nm, making them unobservable under SEM. However, they are visible in the TEM image shown in Figure 5b.
Furthermore, we utilized XPS to analyze the electronic structure and determine the oxidation state of the ruthenium coated onto the silicon nanowires. Signals from 3d photoelectrons of ruthenium typically provide reliable information about the oxidation states of ruthenium species. As shown in Figure 5c, Ru 3d5/2 and Ru 3d3/2 peaks appeared at approximately 281.5 and 285.7 eV, respectively, which is consistent with the peak positions for RuO2[12]. Additionally, the O1s peak in Figure 5d reveals two distinct peaks. The peak around 530 eV is assigned to the lattice oxygen of RuO2, while the peak around 532 eV is attributed to oxygen from SiO2. The presence of SiO2 is due to the surface oxidation of the SiNWs, resulting in the formation of a silicon dioxide layer.
3.2. CO2 Photocatalysis Performance Comparisons of the Different Catalysts
The performance of the catalysts (α-FeOOH@SiNWs, β-FeOOH@SiNWs, Cu@SiNWs, Ni/NiO@SiNWs, and RuO2@SiNWs) for the photocatalytic reduction of CO2 was evaluated. The results, displayed in Figure 6, show the rates of product formation for these catalysts at 80 °C under illumination with a 400 W metal halide bulb. The only products obtained from the photocatalytic reduction of CO2 in a hydrogen environment are CO and CH4, as displayed in Figure 6.
Both α-FeOOH@SiNWs and β-FeOOH@SiNWs produced more CO than CH4, while the Cu@SiNWs, Ni/NiO@SiNWs, and RuO2@SiNWs exhibited higher CH4 selectivities. Although the silicon nanowires of Cu@SiNWs and Ni/NiO@SiNWs catalysts had similar nanoparticle coverages, the CH4 formation rate of the Ni/NiO@SiNWs catalyst was significantly higher (278 μmolgcat−1h−1) than that of Cu@SiNWs (124 μmolgcat−1h−1). This enhanced performance is attributed to the efficient electron separation facilitated by the alignment of the silicon and NiO band gaps relative to the fermi energy of the metallic nickel in Ni/NiO@SiNWs, which provides electrons for the efficient photoreduction of CO2. Of all the catalysts tested, RuO2@SiNWs had the highest CH4 production rates, reaching up to 546 μmolgcat−1h−1. Despite ruthenium being a very expensive rare earth metal, only a minimal amount of RuO2 was required to coat the SiNWs compared to other catalysts.
4. Conclusions
In summary, we have deposited several nanocrystal catalysts onto silicon nanowire arrays grown on silicon wafers. These catalysts have been characterized using SEM, TEM, and XPS techniques. Their performance for the photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide to useful fuels was then evaluated. The highest photomethanation rate was 546 μmolgcat−1h−1 for RuO2@SiNWs, followed by 278 μmolgcat−1h−1 for Ni/NiO@SiNWs. Utilizing silicon nanowire arrays, which can harvest nearly all incident photons from solar radiation as a photocatalytic support, has the potential to be an efficient method for converting carbon dioxide, a major greenhouse gas, into solar fuels.
Author Contributions
Writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, conceptualization, data curation: F.M.A.; conceptualization, supervision, funding acquisition, project administration: D.P., G.A.O.; writing—review and editing, funding acquisition: H.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
Strong and sustained financial support for this work was provided by the Department of Chemistry and the department of Materials Science and Engineering at the University of Toronto, the faculty of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Regina, the Ministry of Research Innovation (MRI), the Ministry of Economic Development, Employment, and Infrastructure (MEDI), the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (MOECC), the Connaught Innovation Fund, the Connaught Global Challenge Fund, Imperial Oil, and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available to the authors and can be obtained upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
F.M.A. thanks the Open Center for the Characterization of Advanced Materials (OCCAM) for access to state-of-the-art surface analytic equipment and electron microscopy techniques. F.M.A and H.I would like to express their sincere gratitude to the Clean Energy Technologies Research Institute (CETRI) for providing resources to support this article preparation and submission.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- Wong, A.P.Y.; Sun, W.; Qian, C.; Ali, F.M.; Jia, J.; Zheng, Z.; Dong, Y.; Ozin, G.A. Tailoring CO2 Reduction with Doped Silicon Nanocrystals. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 2017, 1, 1700118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, F.M.; Gouda, A.; Duchesne, P.N.; Hmadeh, M.; O’Brien, P.G.; Mohan, A.; Ghoussoub, M.; Tountas, A.A.; Ibrahim, H.; Perovic, D.D.; et al. In Situ Probes into the Structural Changes and Active State Evolution of a Highly Selective Iron-Based CO2 Reduction Photocatalyst. Chem. Catal. 2024, 4, 100983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosha, P.; Ali, F.M.; Ibrahim, H. Recent Advances in Hydrogen Production through Catalytic Steam Reforming of Ethanol: Advances in Catalytic Design. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2023, 101, 5498–5518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, F.M.; Hmadeh, M.; O’Brien, P.G.; Perovic, D.D.; Ozin, G.A. Photocatalytic Properties of All Four Polymorphs of Nanostructured Iron Oxyhydroxides. ChemNanoMat 2016, 2, 1047–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, K.; Lee, S. Silicon Nanowires for Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conversion. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 198–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hoch, L.B.; O’Brien, P.G.; Ali, F.M.; Sandhel, A.; Perovic, D.D.; Mims, C.A.; Ozin, G.A. Nanostructured Indium Oxide Coated Silicon Nanowire Arrays: A Hybrid Photothermal/Photochemical Approach to Solar Fuels. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 9017–9025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Roh, I.; Yu, S.; Lin, C.-K.; Louisia, S.; Cestellos-Blanco, S.; Yang, P. Photoelectrochemical CO2 Reduction toward Multicarbon Products with Silicon Nanowire Photocathodes Interfaced with Copper Nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 8002–8006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Torralba-Peñalver, E.; Luo, Y.; Compain, J.-D.; Chardon-Noblat, S.; Fabre, B. Selective Catalytic Electroreduction of CO2 at Silicon Nanowires (SiNWs) Photocathodes Using Non-Noble Metal-Based Manganese Carbonyl Bipyridyl Molecular Catalysts in Solution and Grafted onto SiNWs. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 6138–6147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Z.; Geyer, N.; Werner, P.; de Boor, J.; Gösele, U. Metal-Assisted Chemical Etching of Silicon: A Review. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 285–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Peng, K.-Q.; Yan, Y.-J.; Gao, S.-P.; Zhu, J. Synthesis of Large-Area Silicon Nanowire Arrays via Self-Assembling Nanoelectrochemistry. Adv. Mater. 2002, 14, 1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Li, J.B.; Gong, Q.H.; Teng, J.H.; Hong, M.H. High Aspect Ratio SiNW Arrays with Ag Nanoparticles Decoration for Strong SERS Detection. Nanotechnology 2014, 25, 465707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sarkar, S.; Mukherjee, D.; Harini, R.; Nagaraju, G. Ionic Liquid-Assisted Synthesis of Tri-Functional Ruthenium Oxide Nanoplatelets for Electrochemical Energy Applications. J. Mater. Sci. 2022, 57, 7680–7693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1.
(a,b) SEM images of the α-FeOOH@SiNWs catalyst and those of the (c,d) β-FeOOH@SiNWs catalyst.
Figure 1.
(a,b) SEM images of the α-FeOOH@SiNWs catalyst and those of the (c,d) β-FeOOH@SiNWs catalyst.
Figure 2.
(a,b) SEM images of the Cu@SiNWs catalyst.
Figure 3.
(a,b) SEM images of the Ni@SiNWs catalyst and that of (c,d) Ni/NiO@SiNWs catalyst.
Figure 4.
(a) Band structure of silicon nanowires with respect to fermi energy level of the nickel catalyst; (b) band structure of silicon nanowires with respect to that of nickel oxide; (c) valence and conduction band positions of silicon and nickel oxide with respect to the fermi position of metallic nickel.
Figure 4.
(a) Band structure of silicon nanowires with respect to fermi energy level of the nickel catalyst; (b) band structure of silicon nanowires with respect to that of nickel oxide; (c) valence and conduction band positions of silicon and nickel oxide with respect to the fermi position of metallic nickel.
Figure 5.
(a) SEM image of the RuO2@SiNWs catalyst; (b) TEM image of the RuO2@SiNWs catalyst. XPS showing (c) the 3d and (d) the O1s spectrum of the RuO2@SiNWs catalyst.
Figure 5.
(a) SEM image of the RuO2@SiNWs catalyst; (b) TEM image of the RuO2@SiNWs catalyst. XPS showing (c) the 3d and (d) the O1s spectrum of the RuO2@SiNWs catalyst.
Figure 6.
The photocatalytic performance comparisons of α-FeOOH@SiNWs, β-FeOOH@SiNWs, Cu@SiNWs, Ni/NiO@SiNWs, and RuO2@SiNWs catalysts towards CO2 reduction.
Figure 6.
The photocatalytic performance comparisons of α-FeOOH@SiNWs, β-FeOOH@SiNWs, Cu@SiNWs, Ni/NiO@SiNWs, and RuO2@SiNWs catalysts towards CO2 reduction.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Ali, F.M.; Perovic, D.; Ozin, G.A.; Ibrahim, H. Silicon Nanowire-Supported Catalysts for the Photocatalytic Reduction of Carbon Dioxide. Eng. Proc. 2024, 76, 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024076081
AMA Style
Ali FM, Perovic D, Ozin GA, Ibrahim H. Silicon Nanowire-Supported Catalysts for the Photocatalytic Reduction of Carbon Dioxide. Engineering Proceedings. 2024; 76(1):81. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024076081
Chicago/Turabian StyleAli, Feysal M., Doug Perovic, Geoffrey A. Ozin, and Hussameldin Ibrahim. 2024. "Silicon Nanowire-Supported Catalysts for the Photocatalytic Reduction of Carbon Dioxide" Engineering Proceedings 76, no. 1: 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024076081
Article Metrics
Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.