Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Reviews3
cruel_intentions-71527's rating
Acting and visual quality are alright. But even with the "deep," "artsy" meaning behind the plot, there are better, more fun things to do.
Like watch paint dry. Or looking at cheese aging. Or trying to count all hairs in your pet. Or trying to learn esperanto. Or trying to learn klingon. Or competing with yourself on how fast you can count to one billion. Or trying to find a real treasure using as a map "the Davinci Code". Or collecting all pokemon, shiny, and maxing their iv stats. Or making a cake for every person you hate. Or watching another movie. Or writing a review...
Like watch paint dry. Or looking at cheese aging. Or trying to count all hairs in your pet. Or trying to learn esperanto. Or trying to learn klingon. Or competing with yourself on how fast you can count to one billion. Or trying to find a real treasure using as a map "the Davinci Code". Or collecting all pokemon, shiny, and maxing their iv stats. Or making a cake for every person you hate. Or watching another movie. Or writing a review...
It's not necessary to mention the terrible use of CG (most of which could have been done with cheaper, more realistic non computer effects), because that's not really where this movie can use improvement.
While the acting is mostly good, the script is very weak. Character interactions are awkward. Their relationship seem forced, like there doesn't really look like there's enough motivation for them to stay together. The fighting scenes are really badly coordinated. With that same group and just a bit of tactics, victory would come easy (at least to enemies shown) but instead everyone fights like if they were drunk or disabled somehow; so whenever the heroes are defeated, being in good condition, it is not believable. Also, all heroes are unremarkable: the warrior is not a great fighter, the wizard cast magic sparingly or waits the worst moments to do so, the "thief" is not really stealthy or that quick on the feet, and the priest has no real divine magic or combat power (despite "being trained in combat", see the first part).
Also the name/title of the enemy seemed like inspired from a video game, thus awkward and forced... the ending felt forced as well.
In the end, unless they improve script and character development and interaction, not even "Hercules" can save this movie series...
While the acting is mostly good, the script is very weak. Character interactions are awkward. Their relationship seem forced, like there doesn't really look like there's enough motivation for them to stay together. The fighting scenes are really badly coordinated. With that same group and just a bit of tactics, victory would come easy (at least to enemies shown) but instead everyone fights like if they were drunk or disabled somehow; so whenever the heroes are defeated, being in good condition, it is not believable. Also, all heroes are unremarkable: the warrior is not a great fighter, the wizard cast magic sparingly or waits the worst moments to do so, the "thief" is not really stealthy or that quick on the feet, and the priest has no real divine magic or combat power (despite "being trained in combat", see the first part).
Also the name/title of the enemy seemed like inspired from a video game, thus awkward and forced... the ending felt forced as well.
In the end, unless they improve script and character development and interaction, not even "Hercules" can save this movie series...
The movie takes us through part of the life of a writer who goes through a traumatic experience. That's the only exciting moment of the movie. The rest is just seeing time pass and nothing really happens. Part of the story driving is even the cliché "we can not be happy because we can't have children".
The camera management was alright, and so is the acting(mostly), but the script is all over the place at the beginning and when it finally seems like the plot is going somewhere, it's really not. Calling it "art film" is not an excuse for such a poor movie. I had high hopes because James Franco was in it, but even he did could not redeem this.
The camera management was alright, and so is the acting(mostly), but the script is all over the place at the beginning and when it finally seems like the plot is going somewhere, it's really not. Calling it "art film" is not an excuse for such a poor movie. I had high hopes because James Franco was in it, but even he did could not redeem this.