Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Ratings244
pomeu-63850's rating
Reviews76
pomeu-63850's rating
Do you like to see how a sausage is made? This true crime series might be for you. Do you want to be introduced to a crime, watch the leads develop and see the solution? Move along, this is going to bore the living skull out of you.
What seems to have happened is that Ridley Scott may have brought a cinematic quality to a procedural crime show that is incredibly heavy on procedure. This is a show that might become popular with law enforcement officers and wannabes who enjoy seeing the actual day to day activities that go into a cold crime investigation. You hear the same cops talking endlessly about the same subjects in that very vague legal speak that covers all bases and goes nowhere, for the most part.
This series is for these people. Not for casual true crime fans.
Also, the abrupt ending to the series, with DNA tests still pending, suggest that money on the production may have run out or that maybe the filmmakers decided to move onto other projects, but it definitely leaves the viewer with a feeling of having wasted 4 hours of their lives on this exercise in police interviewing. Cause that's basically what you get. Hours of cops talking about the same things, over and over.
But the production itself looks much better than your average show. The first episode, particularly, where they get a chance to recreate the crime as it happened, is dynamic and exciting.
The series title is a perfect giveaway and metaphor. "At Witt's End" perfect, exciting, engaging. "The Hunt for a Killer" incredibly boring, pedestrian, and overly long.
What seems to have happened is that Ridley Scott may have brought a cinematic quality to a procedural crime show that is incredibly heavy on procedure. This is a show that might become popular with law enforcement officers and wannabes who enjoy seeing the actual day to day activities that go into a cold crime investigation. You hear the same cops talking endlessly about the same subjects in that very vague legal speak that covers all bases and goes nowhere, for the most part.
This series is for these people. Not for casual true crime fans.
Also, the abrupt ending to the series, with DNA tests still pending, suggest that money on the production may have run out or that maybe the filmmakers decided to move onto other projects, but it definitely leaves the viewer with a feeling of having wasted 4 hours of their lives on this exercise in police interviewing. Cause that's basically what you get. Hours of cops talking about the same things, over and over.
But the production itself looks much better than your average show. The first episode, particularly, where they get a chance to recreate the crime as it happened, is dynamic and exciting.
The series title is a perfect giveaway and metaphor. "At Witt's End" perfect, exciting, engaging. "The Hunt for a Killer" incredibly boring, pedestrian, and overly long.
3 stars may be overly generous for this unbelievably bad Police Academy meets Generic 80's Sitcom piece of garbage. I saw this in theaters when I was teenage boy and remember not being impressed by it. Fast forward 35 years later and it's an unbearable stinkersaurus.
Andrew McCarthy recently made a whole documentary about how the Brat Pack label really hurt his career, but I suspect this movie did maybe a lot more damage than that magazine article. Among the other bombs, of course. So much promise, such weak filmography.
Watch this if your sense of humor is infantile, unsophisticated, and on the prudish side.
Oink oink oink oink oink, stinky meow.
Andrew McCarthy recently made a whole documentary about how the Brat Pack label really hurt his career, but I suspect this movie did maybe a lot more damage than that magazine article. Among the other bombs, of course. So much promise, such weak filmography.
Watch this if your sense of humor is infantile, unsophisticated, and on the prudish side.
Oink oink oink oink oink, stinky meow.
... Not. This Tubi special is anything but. It's a psychological thriller of the blandest kind. If this movie were a meal, it would be crock pot tofu. Slow to get done and severely lacking in flavor.
The main character is a standout and any positive that can be heaped on this movie should come through this actress, who is the best thing going for this very simple story. The story is so very thin and very little happens. And the less said about the other actors the better.
The twist is absolutely shocking. Shockingly obvious to the point that during the last 45 minutes of the movie I wanted to yell at the TV. It's him. C'mon, it's him. Can't you see it's HIM? Maybe that's what they were going for.
All in all, it's a watchable little trifle. No nudity, very little violence. A beginner's thriller, if you will.
Mooo, meow meow oink.
The main character is a standout and any positive that can be heaped on this movie should come through this actress, who is the best thing going for this very simple story. The story is so very thin and very little happens. And the less said about the other actors the better.
The twist is absolutely shocking. Shockingly obvious to the point that during the last 45 minutes of the movie I wanted to yell at the TV. It's him. C'mon, it's him. Can't you see it's HIM? Maybe that's what they were going for.
All in all, it's a watchable little trifle. No nudity, very little violence. A beginner's thriller, if you will.
Mooo, meow meow oink.