etsenberg

I have nothing against the fantasy genre unless it is disguised as other and more serious genres,like SF (Star Wars, Dune) or History. This film is related to history as much as, say, a movie about WWII, where General Reagan leads the US Army against Napoleon, who is, by the way, black. Eventually, Reagan's son, Prince Hamlet, is crowned as the new President in Rome, NY, This film could be watchable - nothing that we did not see 1000 times before, but watchable - if it took place in a fictional kingdom of a fictional world, But why the hell did they use the real names, pretending it to be based on real events?! I deeply regret the people, especially the young ones, who get their "knowledge" about history from such movies.

I totally absolutely hate every movie or book (or author) which propagates the ideas "human emotions are better than intellect, love is more important than science, "heart" is wiser than mind" and all that crap. I disgust this even in fantasy, and when something with such ideas even approaches the SF genre, it should be considered a felony! I hate Interstellar for that, but Interstellar still had some good visual effects and. Being mostly anti-scientific and illogical, had at least SOME (not many) scientifically-ground points. This film has none. It is totally stupid, based on the most primitive clichés, lacking both knowledge and imagination and just boring.