Reviews

There are not many Stephen King novels left haven't got a movie adaption yet. Surfing on the wave of the mega successful new "It" movie comes such a first timer in the form of Netflix' "Gerald's Game".

I thought that I would never see a movie out of this story. While similar to "Misery" with a desperate character bound to a bed this one is tougher: after fifteen minutes you have only one living character left for almost the rest of the movie (as we see at the end, there are actually two). Now, how can you make an interesting movie out of that? The answer: Carla Gugino, Bruce Greenwood and a terrific script. Jesse begins to talk to an imagined Gerald (Greenwood) and an imagined twin of her who I would call Super-Jesse. The devilish Gerald tries to lure her into sleep, tries to convince her to give up and just wait for death. On the other hand Super-Jesse keeps her focused on surviving.

The movie shifts gears when dark secrets from Jesse's troubled childhood are shown in flashbacks. The scenes with the eclipse strongly reminded me of another genius King adaptation "Dolores" with Kathy Bates. Henry Thomas plays the father in the same luring and deceiving way as Gerald. Jesse is cursed with this pattern of male dominators, but in the end her past is the key to her future.

Finally a real monster appears in the form of the Moonlight Man. I think in the book King called this entity the "Space Cowboy", the "Gangster of Love" (based on Steve Miller's "The Joker"). It's the classic monster of our childhood: it hides in the shadows or under the bed and it comes at you at night. For sure it's just imagination, isn't it?

The final climax is something that is hard to watch, be prepared "it's gonna f*cking hurt".

Carla Gugino plays all of this physical and psychological torture absolutely convincingly. Bruce Greenwood is awesome, especially in imagined form. His ongoing monologue about how his and Jesse's dead bodies will be found is fantastic. Chiara Aurelia does a great job as young Jesse.

Last but not least I bow to Mike Flanagan. The script, co-written by him, stays very true to the book. There is some gore, yes, but the psychological interplay is much more frightening. The direction and camera work is great, I would say this is Darabont-Level. Hooray, Flanagan will also do "The Haunting of Hill House" for Netflix!

I really looked forward to see this movie, although the trailers already gave a lot of stuff away (which trailers do all the time these days). Now after seeing the movie I must say I'm deeply disappointed.

The movie starts off well, Ridley Scott knows how to shoot space stuff. We get a short look at the crew (including two main characters: a Ripley wanna-be-double and Fassbender-Android v2.0 "Walter") before they make a first stupid decision to cancel their original mission to follow a strange signal from another inhabitable planet. Almost the whole crew goes there unprotected and as expected, hell breaks loose when they get in contact with the black goo pathogens planted by nobody else as Fassbender-Android v1.0 "David". Crew members get infected and give birth to alien like monsters which in turn kill the crew one after another. Then evil David saves the day just to feed the other crew members to his homemade alien zoo.

It looks like a movie that the filmmakers made a u-turn in the middle of shooting. First they were on the path to Prometheus 2. Then the whole Blomkamp thing went viral and they probably thought they needed to put more original Alien ingredients into the sauce. That way the whole Shaw story line about the Engineers is scrapped in a two minute flashback, after that the movie is basically a reboot of the first Alien. All of that results in a disjointed "Promalien".

I found the CGI a lot worse than Prometheus. The CGI aliens look bad, especially the newly born babies which don't look disgusting anymore but almost cute. The neomorph looks fine but only has minimum screen time. The egg-facehugger-chestburster-xenomorph cycle is done in five minutes and our beloved xeno looks awful in CGI. It's not "Alien 3" badness, but still inferior to all predecessors (including AvP). It's really not threatening at all, it behaves more like an angry cat.

The action sequences had too much fast cuts. The attack sequence in the wheat field is happening too fast, in almost darkness and with too many similarly looking characters. When they try to defeat the xenomorph two times in the end I couldn't make any sense of the action on the screen, and honestly, I didn't care. The main actress is miscast as a Ripley replacement, I never believed her when showed toughness or bad-assery.

Fassbender is good as always but has too much screen time including a cringe-worthy scene with him showing his "brother" to play the flute. And he continues to be the villain for a potential followup movie. I don't know if I like this.

In the whole "Alien: Covenant" is a gigantic failure. I thought I would never say that but I think the Alien franchise would do better without Scott and his irritating decisions. Like with Star Wars, the whole idea of a sequence of prequels which need to somehow connect to a lot older movie seems to generate mediocre and forced story lines. Even worse they seem to damage the great mystery of the original movies: the xenomorph is now basically just the result of the experiments of a mad robot. That's it, really?

This episode proves how hard and complex it is to take your time to develop a story arc over multiple seasons and how rewarding the final climax can be. Not only once was I a little annoyed by the slow burning of the "Jimmy & Chuck" story line. I found the "Mike & Gus" stuff from the last episodes a lot more interesting.

Man, was I wrong. After the last episode you wondered how Jimmy would weasel himself out of the mess. And then we finally witness how cleverly Jimmy turns his brother's trap against him. Thanks to Bob Odenkirk's portrayal we also see how it hurts him to destroy his brother in front of his boss and ex-wife.

For me the greatest revelation was the acting of Michael McKean. During Chuck's breakdown the camera moves closer and closer to the actor's face and he manages to hold the tension, every nuance is perfect and utterly believable. The best acting on TV I saw in a long time, absolutely award worthy.

I was really hyped for this movie. The trailer was awesome, it captured the atmosphere of the ROTJ-Aftermath perfectly (mighty Star Destroyer wrecks lay in sand dunes). And after seeing the masked villain and the light sabers my imagination went off ... I thought, well, there are still some Sith sprinkled throughout the galaxy and they form a terrorist group which attacks the new established republic. There would be questions about who the leader of this group is and what they want to achieve. I thought of a Republican army which gets somehow undercut by a malicious figure. I thought of Han and Leia living a peaceful life in retirement but getting involved in the handling of the terrorist threat. I thought of Luke leading a Jedi academy. I thought of Lando educating young pilots. I thought that those beloved characters meet after a long time to support the Republic. I thought ... and then I watched TFA and everything went down the kitchen sink.

TFA is not a bad movie from a technical point of view. They created great visual and practical effects. The actors give good performances, a lot better than the ones of the miserable CGI- infested prequels. I also like the music better this time with a revived innocent quality like we had in ANH.

But all this didn't help to rescue a recycled plot. After half an hour into the movie you can predict every single story element because it's a more or less direct ripoff of ANH. A lot of other reviewers already listed so I will safe the space here.

What really hurts is that there is no invention, no surprises in this film. Everything is absolutely the way you expected it to be. Why has Han Solo still be a smuggler with the same clothes after thirty years ? Why not give him another role (politician, husband) first and then enjoy the satisfaction when he gets back into Solo- Mode with Chewie ? So many missed opportunities ...

George Lucas at least showed us new planets or environments in the prequels which we could look at in awe. In TFA: nothing new. The new locations look boring and there are almost no new vehicles. There is no sense of epicness about it, everything seems so ... "local". The space ships now fight over landscapes instead in space.

So for the technical merits I give this film two stars. Storywise it's a complete failure.

Lord of the Rings: so many moments which I vividly remember, some examples ...

Part 1: Beautiful landscapes; lovable characters; gradually expanding storyline; White Council at Rivendell; fight with the Balrog & the Uruk-Hai; heartbreaking scenes like Gandalf's or Boromir's death or the reunion of Frodo and Sam.

Part 2: Again beautiful movie; epic war at Helm's Deep and Isengard; goosebumps when the Ents march to fight Saruman; caring for Frodo & Sam; excited about the first real life CGI character Gollum.

Part 3: Breathtakingly towering Minas Tirith; epic war on the Pelennor fields; Frodo & Sam reaching Mount Doom after killing Shelob; moved to tears during the endings, especially Frodo's leaving to Grey Havens.

Hobbit: oh well ... Part 1: Beautiful Hobbiton; seeing Gandalf again; nice (but very similar and unfunny) dwarf characters; Stone Giants Part 2: Smaug (I hated Stephen Fry's role and the whole Laketown stuff) Part 3: Pfffff ...

Really I have problems to remember what really happened in the Hobbit trilogy because there was no real story line. Jackson tried hard to inject some emotions here and there but this didn't really work most of the time (Tauriel & Kili ? Epic fail). Even the music is much worse compared to the stuff that Howard Shore composed for LOTR, also emotionally lacking.

I'm glad it's over now.

I just left the cinema and want to write my review with the fresh impressions.

As most of the reviewers mentioned, the special effects are perfect. Kong is simply awesome, it's not a humanized ape but a very authentic silver-back with absolutely believable facial expressions. The whole Skull Island environment and its animals are beautifully crafted. New York looks great, especially the scenes with helicopter shots of Empire State Building.

So back to the story: we all knew it and it's a hard task to revive such a story for today's viewers. Jackson introduces the characters quite extensively, perhaps a little bit too long for those viewers that want non-stop action. Skull Island is mainly a roller-coaster ride with some breathtaking dinosaur scenes. The bug cave is really creepy and surreal with an unusual usage of very mellow music.

The actors deliver fine performances throughout the movie. Naomi Watts brings emotional intensity into the story without being too cheesy. I didn't expect Adrian Brody to fit so well in his first action movie.

One last remarks about James Newton Howard's music: he had a very tough job with replacing Howard Shore and write an epic, moving score within five weeks. Man, he did succeed in every aspect. The intense string sections work so well with the beautiful but also tragic images. The action music is top notch and unleashes the power of the full orchestra. Really great, James, you faced the challenge successfully. A sure Oscar contender.

I really wanted to give Bay another chance although I had sworn that I would never go to see another Bay movie after a painful watching of Armageddon. I read the rave reviews here and I finally decided to watch this movie.

The exposition is quite long but interesting. Nice production design although clichéd. Good actors like McGregor and Bean. But as soon as the chase begins it's all typical Bay: ultra-fast cuts, long crane and helicopter shots, slow-motion shots of the heroes, Zimmer-like music, ridiculous action scenes like the one on the R logo ... well, in short: BORING ! And as always there are scenes that make me (and not only me) cringe like the kiss scene or the final scene on the hilltop (slomo-on-acid).

It must be me but I never watched a Bay movie that sucked me in story wise. Too much cliché (as the bad black guy that converts instantly from bad to good) that makes me laugh, too obvious camera shots that shall make me think WOW. It's the story, stupid ! After that flop I hope that Bay finally learns how to tell a story.

This movie looks like Paris Hilton begged her daddy to finance some cool, retro horror movie for her private Halloween party. Expensive cameras, sophisticated makeup effects, creepy music.

It could have worked (even with that awful script) when the money would have been given to a more talented director than Eli Roth. The cuts are so dumb, leaving the viewer in total confusion. Cliché camera shots like the one which follows the tubes from the reservoir up to the cabin. No building up of tension, you can foresee the scare by two minutes. Oh, what scares ? The only thing that was mildly scaring was the girl getting stuffed into the shack.

But this could have been sooooo much better. A lot more paranoia between the group members (Eli, just watch Carpenter's "The Thing" please) and leave out this stupid policeman who IS NOT COOL ! The bunny man IS NOT COOL ! Gore without suspense IS NOT COOL.

Man, I really angry that I spent the money to buy this crap. Peter Jackson must have had strange visions when he watched this movie during his diet. It simply doesn't work.