Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Ratings12
tannerlu's rating
Reviews5
tannerlu's rating
I have watched this series over 15 times. And it never gets old. Avatar is an incredible television show full of heart and epic fantasy. The fight sequences are perfectly choreographed. The animation is beautiful and only improves over the course of the series. The female characters are some of the most-well written and complex in television to date, Azula being one of the best static characters of all time. Asian philosophy is intimately woven into the fabric of the show and educates the audience while breathing life into its universe. Even after 10 years, television and film alike fail to tell stories with the authenticity and wonder that Avatar has. Absolutely everyone should watch this show.
I would definitely recommend that those interested in watching skip this film.
Spielbergs' film imagines a grim colonial Shanghai, full of selfish and antagonistic individuals whose sinister traits are only exacerbated by the onset of war. I'm a history student and watched this for a paper I was writing over film in the British Empire. This film was long, meandering, and aimless. I have absolutely no idea what it was trying to say. Jim is an extremely annoying and privileged upper-class child of British colonists. I understand in part that this is meant to illustrate that he is extremely sheltered, but he fails to become more endearing as the film progresses, even as he gains more real-world experience.
Which brings me to my next point; no one in this film is likable. Basie is extraordinarily arrogant and rude, his affection for Jim feels entirely conditional, his dialogue feels anachronistic (lots of cheesy 80s cool guy one-liners), and his character ultimately feels pointless. The doctor and other characters who act as paternal figures for Jim are all cowardly or self-serving, or both. This is perhaps to portray how people become self-serving in times of war or disaster (which isn't supported by evidence; in times of disaster people are more pro-social), but it just makes everyone in the film unlikable and gives viewers no one to root for. Jim's parents are pretentious, underdeveloped, and it feels as if they have only the slightest affection for him.
The depiction of Chinese and Japanese people has not aged well, either. The Chinese characters in this film are depicted as ingratiating, subservient, or antagonistic toward the British. The Japanese (with the exception of one teenage boy who perhaps serves as an analogue to Jim) are depicted as bloodthirsty and uncompassionate warriors. While they were fascists who committed a number of war crimes during WW2, I still think their overall cruelty played up within this film.
This film felt like it was 30 or 45 minutes too long. There seemed to be no clear thesis or unifying purpose to the film. It's not even especially valuable historically, it mostly focuses on Jim's individual perceptions and experiences with war, but never seems to drive home a defined point about how war affects children or how they experience it, other than Jim acting downright irrational and bizarre towards the end.
Spielbergs' film imagines a grim colonial Shanghai, full of selfish and antagonistic individuals whose sinister traits are only exacerbated by the onset of war. I'm a history student and watched this for a paper I was writing over film in the British Empire. This film was long, meandering, and aimless. I have absolutely no idea what it was trying to say. Jim is an extremely annoying and privileged upper-class child of British colonists. I understand in part that this is meant to illustrate that he is extremely sheltered, but he fails to become more endearing as the film progresses, even as he gains more real-world experience.
Which brings me to my next point; no one in this film is likable. Basie is extraordinarily arrogant and rude, his affection for Jim feels entirely conditional, his dialogue feels anachronistic (lots of cheesy 80s cool guy one-liners), and his character ultimately feels pointless. The doctor and other characters who act as paternal figures for Jim are all cowardly or self-serving, or both. This is perhaps to portray how people become self-serving in times of war or disaster (which isn't supported by evidence; in times of disaster people are more pro-social), but it just makes everyone in the film unlikable and gives viewers no one to root for. Jim's parents are pretentious, underdeveloped, and it feels as if they have only the slightest affection for him.
The depiction of Chinese and Japanese people has not aged well, either. The Chinese characters in this film are depicted as ingratiating, subservient, or antagonistic toward the British. The Japanese (with the exception of one teenage boy who perhaps serves as an analogue to Jim) are depicted as bloodthirsty and uncompassionate warriors. While they were fascists who committed a number of war crimes during WW2, I still think their overall cruelty played up within this film.
This film felt like it was 30 or 45 minutes too long. There seemed to be no clear thesis or unifying purpose to the film. It's not even especially valuable historically, it mostly focuses on Jim's individual perceptions and experiences with war, but never seems to drive home a defined point about how war affects children or how they experience it, other than Jim acting downright irrational and bizarre towards the end.
Review pretty much sums it up. The last season was mediocre, the ending was a disaster. It's still a great show, don't get me wrong, and the first few seasons are still great if you'd consider watching. Sad that it had such a rushed and sloppy execution the last few seasons of what was once a gloriously detailed, rich and immersive fantasy series.
EDIT: I changed my rating from a 6 (which I believe is accurate when assessing the series as a wholes) to a 1 to bring the ratings down. It does not deserve a 9.3.
I've also thought more about how gratuitous the violence and sexual assault is in this show. Not only is it unnecessary and sensationalist, it's ahistorical. I am a history major and my medieval history professor made a point to point out the historical inaccuracies in this show. Yes, it's fantasy, but it still perpetuates negative false stereotypes about medieval life.
EDIT: I changed my rating from a 6 (which I believe is accurate when assessing the series as a wholes) to a 1 to bring the ratings down. It does not deserve a 9.3.
I've also thought more about how gratuitous the violence and sexual assault is in this show. Not only is it unnecessary and sensationalist, it's ahistorical. I am a history major and my medieval history professor made a point to point out the historical inaccuracies in this show. Yes, it's fantasy, but it still perpetuates negative false stereotypes about medieval life.