Kingslaay
Joined Mar 2014
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Ratings4K
Kingslaay's rating
Reviews1K
Kingslaay's rating
Married at First Sight UK is a fascinating mix of social experiment, romance, and reality TV chaos. While the concept of strangers marrying sight unseen is undeniably wild, it makes for incredibly entertaining viewing. The show thrives on its mix of genuine connections, dramatic clashes, and expert interventions, keeping you hooked from start to finish.
There's a solid balance between heartfelt moments and explosive confrontations, making it both engaging and unpredictable. Some couples genuinely try to make things work, while others seem more drawn to the drama than the relationship, but that's part of what makes it so watchable. The format is well-paced, with commitment ceremonies and dinner parties adding to the intensity.
While it sometimes leans into reality TV tropes, MAFS UK remains an enjoyable watch for those who love relationship dynamics and a bit of guilty-pleasure drama. A solid 7/10 for its addictive nature and emotional highs and lows!
There's a solid balance between heartfelt moments and explosive confrontations, making it both engaging and unpredictable. Some couples genuinely try to make things work, while others seem more drawn to the drama than the relationship, but that's part of what makes it so watchable. The format is well-paced, with commitment ceremonies and dinner parties adding to the intensity.
While it sometimes leans into reality TV tropes, MAFS UK remains an enjoyable watch for those who love relationship dynamics and a bit of guilty-pleasure drama. A solid 7/10 for its addictive nature and emotional highs and lows!
I have watched every episode of Yellowstone and feel that a lot of its popularity and strength lies in the star power of Kevin Costner and his portrayal of ruthless John Dutton. In essence the show is about land and has a very interesting premise. The first 2-3 seasons were by far the strongest but the last few seasons, especially the last season was really disappointing. Given how this series ended, I do not believe it deserves such an inflated rating. The writing, pacing, character development and overall quality is just not there. Some issues to I had:
Season 3 Storyline with Beck Brothers: Two brothers who were built up as formidable foes only to be easily taken down by the Dutton's with zero consequence. Really? It was a lackluster end and they could have been such stronger adversaries.
Character development: they missed the boat with Jamie and other key characters. Jamie's character had such potential but they made him take so many turns for a weak payoff in the end. He could have really been developed into something. Instead his storylines in later seasons and ultimately his fate was sadly tied to Beth and her hatred for him.
Beth: She has to be the most toxic and annoying character on the screen. The nonsense that they let Beth get away with was ludicrous and unrealistic. Some things would never fly in real life. She was a character that was screaming to be dealt some hard truths and face some karma, if only the writers did viewers a favour. It infuriated me how she often had ready access to Jamie's Attorney General's office and his house and faced no consequences. Plot armour at its worst.
Flimsy writing: similar to the Beck Brothers, the writing was weak often with a few loopholes. For example, the Market Equity Storyline was this firm was a multibillion dollar firm with so many resources who could have hired an army of lawyers only to be outplayed by a solo player, Beth who was able to outmaneuver a CEO as well, unrealistic writing.
The acting is strong overall and the realism of the setting should be praised. But this show is genuinely overhyped and inflated in my opinion, 6.8/10.
Season 3 Storyline with Beck Brothers: Two brothers who were built up as formidable foes only to be easily taken down by the Dutton's with zero consequence. Really? It was a lackluster end and they could have been such stronger adversaries.
Character development: they missed the boat with Jamie and other key characters. Jamie's character had such potential but they made him take so many turns for a weak payoff in the end. He could have really been developed into something. Instead his storylines in later seasons and ultimately his fate was sadly tied to Beth and her hatred for him.
Beth: She has to be the most toxic and annoying character on the screen. The nonsense that they let Beth get away with was ludicrous and unrealistic. Some things would never fly in real life. She was a character that was screaming to be dealt some hard truths and face some karma, if only the writers did viewers a favour. It infuriated me how she often had ready access to Jamie's Attorney General's office and his house and faced no consequences. Plot armour at its worst.
Flimsy writing: similar to the Beck Brothers, the writing was weak often with a few loopholes. For example, the Market Equity Storyline was this firm was a multibillion dollar firm with so many resources who could have hired an army of lawyers only to be outplayed by a solo player, Beth who was able to outmaneuver a CEO as well, unrealistic writing.
The acting is strong overall and the realism of the setting should be praised. But this show is genuinely overhyped and inflated in my opinion, 6.8/10.