Let me start by saying I'm generally a Brosnan fan, and also a Neeson fan. My problems with this movie are pretty sweeping, though.
These days, a revenge story needs at least a little something to set it apart - even if it's just in the execution, the direction, the performances - something. This film didn't have anything to help it rise above. In fact, some scenes are so predictable and contrived, that it felt very much like a B-movie to me.
The brief history we're given about Neeson's previous life feels fake, and sloppy. It's just there to tell us why there's a conflict between these two men, and it feels tacked on. Also, its execution is ridiculous and implausible. If you take it at face value, it's just a stupid accident that could've been avoided if *anyone* there did *anything* other than watch, open-mouthed. It's told in a flashback, and supposed to give Neeson's character his much-need pathos, but it feels as contrived as a comic book super villain's back story.
While Brosnan does give a somewhat likable and quirky performance for the most part, I couldn't help wondering why this Civil War officer couldn't shake his Irish/British accent. Maybe my memory's hazy but I thought both Brosnan and Neeson had (at one point in their careers) been able to affect convincing American accents. It's just one more little detail about this film that strikes me as lazy.
If Neeson himself was an ex-soldier, and had hired some trackers/bounty hunters to get Brosnan, then the number of times he times escapes (and how it happens on screen) is just plain embarrassing. This is part of why this whole thing feels like actors going through the motions. At this point, any viewer says to himself "Oh, well, he had to escape, so the rest of the pursuers can get killed off one-by-one, and then we can have the final showdown, Mano-a-Mano." Basically, you have to become an apologist for this ridiculous script in order to make it through to the end.
And, of course, before the end, the filmmaker desperately wanted to add some kind of psychobabble to give some depth to this paper-thin story, so we get Anjelica Huston hitting us over the head with some goofy, allegorical role. Totally unnecessary. Sloppy, ham-fisted direction. I feel pretty generous, giving this a 3 out of 10.
Skip this one, and save yourself the disappointment.
These days, a revenge story needs at least a little something to set it apart - even if it's just in the execution, the direction, the performances - something. This film didn't have anything to help it rise above. In fact, some scenes are so predictable and contrived, that it felt very much like a B-movie to me.
The brief history we're given about Neeson's previous life feels fake, and sloppy. It's just there to tell us why there's a conflict between these two men, and it feels tacked on. Also, its execution is ridiculous and implausible. If you take it at face value, it's just a stupid accident that could've been avoided if *anyone* there did *anything* other than watch, open-mouthed. It's told in a flashback, and supposed to give Neeson's character his much-need pathos, but it feels as contrived as a comic book super villain's back story.
While Brosnan does give a somewhat likable and quirky performance for the most part, I couldn't help wondering why this Civil War officer couldn't shake his Irish/British accent. Maybe my memory's hazy but I thought both Brosnan and Neeson had (at one point in their careers) been able to affect convincing American accents. It's just one more little detail about this film that strikes me as lazy.
If Neeson himself was an ex-soldier, and had hired some trackers/bounty hunters to get Brosnan, then the number of times he times escapes (and how it happens on screen) is just plain embarrassing. This is part of why this whole thing feels like actors going through the motions. At this point, any viewer says to himself "Oh, well, he had to escape, so the rest of the pursuers can get killed off one-by-one, and then we can have the final showdown, Mano-a-Mano." Basically, you have to become an apologist for this ridiculous script in order to make it through to the end.
And, of course, before the end, the filmmaker desperately wanted to add some kind of psychobabble to give some depth to this paper-thin story, so we get Anjelica Huston hitting us over the head with some goofy, allegorical role. Totally unnecessary. Sloppy, ham-fisted direction. I feel pretty generous, giving this a 3 out of 10.
Skip this one, and save yourself the disappointment.
Tell Your Friends