cynthia-boras

Very entertaining and uplifting movie. Just so very enjoyable for a change. Flora´s character is credible. She reminded me of myself as a child. She has quite a presence. Doesn´t compare to Dacota Fanning as a child actress, but a good choice as character lead.

Now let´s talk about the squirrel. The animations and scenes are very cute and well done. I fell in love with it and now want a squirrel, too. They didn´t put that much love to detail in the cat character. The story is quite simple, but it just brightened my day to watch that film. I nearly shed a tear at the end.

This movie provides a good mixture of entertainment, comedy and drama. No age limit on that one. Interesting approach to the superhero genre that I found very pleasant to watch. I was hesitant to take one star off since I disliked the ending, but I just couldn´t. This film brought a smile to my face and I will watch it again. Straight up to my favourite list. Thank you Disney for no singing included in the movie!

Even if you feel dead inside, give this movie a shot to warm your heart a little. We all deserve smiles and happiness.

Some all American dumbsters heading out to the wilderness because one of them has a camera? The people in front of the camera didn´t even make an effort. I wouldn´t go that far as to call them actors, not even characters bec they have none. I have seen better performances and content in pre-school plays.

Who volunteered to participate in that project after having read the script if there ever was one?

I do understand that making movies is expensive, but this was just stunning and below low budget.

One star for an idea that got ruined in various ways. Not sure why it is listed as comedy as well. Maybe because the sound effects that came from youtube are just ridiculous? Is it because the "actors" are so bad and the dialogues were probably written by the local McDonalds staff on their lunch break in a team effort? So many questions.

One additonal star for at least sparing the viewer amateur sex and nudity.

What you get: nice old mansion, crap story, horrible acting, special effects dating back to the 80s The idea for this movie is not too bad. The synopsis sounded interesting enough to me. It raises expectations the movie can't deliver.

Who casted these guys as actors? This is sometimes so bad that it gets funny. I have seen a lot better in music videos or even TV commercials for breakfast cereals. Who wrote the dialogues? Repetitive and boring. They talk so much about things nobody would ever find interesting.

What actually happens for 40 min is close to nothing. How is that even possible? They could have elaborated on the old mansion, on the story or on the characters. Thos is a whole new dimension of boring.

There was one scene with really outstanding visual effects. You get books flying around. That was so bad. Even adjusting them on a rope and moving the rope with the books would have been more impressive. I haven't seen something like that in ages.

So much potential wasted here. Do yourself a favour, go to the dentist, clean the filter of your vacuum cleaner or check if your vaccinations are up to date. Can think of so many other things I wouldn't like to do rather than having to watch that film again.

I give 1 for story idea and 1 for everybody involved to finish a project like that.