adansantos
Joined Mar 2013
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Ratings1.2K
adansantos's rating
Reviews54
adansantos's rating
What an absolute pile of derivative, logic-devoid, predictable trash. From the ridiculous idea, the even-worse-than-chatgpt-generated dialoge (which has to be one of the cringiest ever), the total lack of chemistry between Miles & Anna (no doubt due to the awful dialogue lines). It just looks like you're watching a twicht stream of a video game. I was lured into thinking this would be ok (despite the ridiculous trailer), by the quite high rating, which has oviously been gamed by the usual stream of fake 10/10 reviews, and by people who like watching video games on their TV. Dumbest waste of two hours ever. AI would be proud of this movie.
Flight Risk, is a film that had the potential to be a gripping thriller but ultimately falls flat due to a combination of poor storytelling, lackluster performances, and a general sense of predictability. Despite the star power behind it, the movie fails to deliver on its promise of high-stakes tension and instead becomes a forgettable entry in the action-thriller genre.
One of the most glaring issues with it, is its uninspired and formulaic plot. The story revolves around a pilot (played by Wahlberg) who becomes embroiled in a dangerous situation while transporting a fugitive. While this premise could have been the foundation for a tense and engaging narrative, the execution is disappointingly bland. The plot unfolds in a predictable manner, with few surprises or twists to keep the audience engaged. The stakes never feel particularly high, and the resolution is both rushed and unsatisfying, leaving viewers with a sense of anticlimax.
Mark Wahlberg, who has proven his acting chops in other films, seems to be on autopilot here. His performance lacks the depth and intensity needed to make his character compelling. Instead, he comes across as one-dimensional, with little emotional range or development throughout the film. The supporting cast doesn't fare much better, with most characters feeling underdeveloped and serving as little more than plot devices. The lack of strong character arcs or meaningful interactions further detracts from the film's overall impact.
The direction by Mel Gibson is another weak point. Known for his work in front of and behind the camera, Gibson's efforts here feel uninspired and lack the visceral energy that has characterized some of his previous projects. The pacing is uneven, with long stretches of tedium punctuated by brief moments of action that fail to generate any real excitement. The film's attempts at building suspense often fall flat, as the tension is undermined by predictable plot developments and a lack of genuine stakes.
The screenplay is equally problematic, plagued by clichéd dialogue and a lack of originality. The characters frequently spout lines that feel forced and unnatural, making it difficult for the audience to connect with them or become invested in their fates. The film also struggles to balance its tone, veering awkwardly between moments of attempted seriousness and unintentional humor. This tonal inconsistency further detracts from the overall experience, making it hard to take the film seriously.
Visually, Flight Risk is equally unremarkable. The cinematography lacks creativity, with few memorable shots or sequences that stand out. The action scenes, which should be the film's highlight, are poorly choreographed and lack the intensity needed to leave a lasting impression. The special effects are serviceable but nothing more, failing to elevate the film or add any sense of spectacle.
One of the most glaring issues with it, is its uninspired and formulaic plot. The story revolves around a pilot (played by Wahlberg) who becomes embroiled in a dangerous situation while transporting a fugitive. While this premise could have been the foundation for a tense and engaging narrative, the execution is disappointingly bland. The plot unfolds in a predictable manner, with few surprises or twists to keep the audience engaged. The stakes never feel particularly high, and the resolution is both rushed and unsatisfying, leaving viewers with a sense of anticlimax.
Mark Wahlberg, who has proven his acting chops in other films, seems to be on autopilot here. His performance lacks the depth and intensity needed to make his character compelling. Instead, he comes across as one-dimensional, with little emotional range or development throughout the film. The supporting cast doesn't fare much better, with most characters feeling underdeveloped and serving as little more than plot devices. The lack of strong character arcs or meaningful interactions further detracts from the film's overall impact.
The direction by Mel Gibson is another weak point. Known for his work in front of and behind the camera, Gibson's efforts here feel uninspired and lack the visceral energy that has characterized some of his previous projects. The pacing is uneven, with long stretches of tedium punctuated by brief moments of action that fail to generate any real excitement. The film's attempts at building suspense often fall flat, as the tension is undermined by predictable plot developments and a lack of genuine stakes.
The screenplay is equally problematic, plagued by clichéd dialogue and a lack of originality. The characters frequently spout lines that feel forced and unnatural, making it difficult for the audience to connect with them or become invested in their fates. The film also struggles to balance its tone, veering awkwardly between moments of attempted seriousness and unintentional humor. This tonal inconsistency further detracts from the overall experience, making it hard to take the film seriously.
Visually, Flight Risk is equally unremarkable. The cinematography lacks creativity, with few memorable shots or sequences that stand out. The action scenes, which should be the film's highlight, are poorly choreographed and lack the intensity needed to leave a lasting impression. The special effects are serviceable but nothing more, failing to elevate the film or add any sense of spectacle.
It is little wonder that this ended on the most derivative and unoriginal streaming service.
It is even worse than the first part. From the slow motion being over used, even in the harvesting of wheat (!!!), to the feeling that this could have perfectly been the last 15 minutes of a 90 minute movie, and not four bloody hours.
Ed Shrkein is cartoonishly evil, Sofia Boutella seems to have the range of a constipated beetroot, and Zack has seemingly relegated the writing of the script to ChatGpt.
And that ending... Zack obviously wants to keep churning more episodes of this tripe. Let's hope Crapflix sees that it is really not worth it.
It is even worse than the first part. From the slow motion being over used, even in the harvesting of wheat (!!!), to the feeling that this could have perfectly been the last 15 minutes of a 90 minute movie, and not four bloody hours.
Ed Shrkein is cartoonishly evil, Sofia Boutella seems to have the range of a constipated beetroot, and Zack has seemingly relegated the writing of the script to ChatGpt.
And that ending... Zack obviously wants to keep churning more episodes of this tripe. Let's hope Crapflix sees that it is really not worth it.