sreekirx

movie based on a history of Hindu culture lacks the depth of emotions and any sort of expressions on face. it was dumb and i felt like, it was a bit too bad. even though the thing loses its track, the movie has some key elements to quickly grasp the audience. the perfect cinematography and stunning camera work makes this a definite watch. all the cartoon pictures, had not been so much visually brilliant. the arrow heading for the attacks and swords slashes and some stunts on board with fused slow motions gave the grip. the climax battle seemed clichéd and was not impressive. looks like the animator has decided to bring upon the king Kong climax. climbing the building look alike of empire states and assaulting the baddie is something joyful, but seriously has done the damage. the initial scene, was confusing and till it was aboard, no one realized who is speaking to whom. until later we get to know it. then onwards things are really different and movie takes a turn after intermission. the last 30 minutes was definite watchable though clichéd was better than the first half. the movie seemed like a 2010 movie. the muscular build up and 6-pack like appearances , are quite funny but not good. it is a classic retold. how can they make such silly mistakes. lack of any emotions in characters and bland expressions and just drops of tears and eye blinking are seen here. looks like the animator has taken to rest for a while and was forced to do it. may be he did not get enough pay. the scenes looked clichéd and movie was way too small. just about 90 min. a classic retold well, not retold , just shown with some graphics and camera movement with some crisp art work and lackluster dialogs is this. take a stroll in the park and think to have a look at it. the previous movie was way better.

TEENMAAR review Opening statement: breezy love stories that declares generational differences The case: the love stories of Micheal and arjun. The fate: when two characters are involved, there must be ample scope for editing and narration

Evidence: The movie being similar to many old movies, has same old formula of love stories never stay forever. But in this case, it is clear and teenmaar has two love stories. On one side Micheal who has lot of girl friends and starts loving meera , but after 1 year they split up. Micheal listens to the story of arjun and how he had his chance for love. The two generations are different and trends are different , but yet love stays the same. Micheal realizes his mistakes and goes for meera. What happened to meera? Is she waiting for Micheal or settled herself is the story!! Coming to the point, the movie story is good. But the narration is perfect. Screenplay is good connecting both stories at a time. The movie has many evidences , to make it a very good film. Firstly is the screenplay, one can get perfect screenplay here. No where you find instances where the movie goes on the slow side. Once such cases occur, director immediately shifts the story towards next character. The last 30 minutes of the movie is real asset. Nice emotional filled dialogs , in the marriage scene will give the grip to the movie. Secondly is the music and the best 3 songs are perfectly picturized. Every song has a character and life in it. Thirdly , is the acting skills of pawan kalyan especially as arjun palwai. Trisha as meera , especially in second half last 20 minutes. She definitely showed her skills. Fourthly is the camera work especially the locales of Varanasi.

Judgement revealed: the movie stands different among others. Nice entertainer with hints of emotional content and pleasing climax.

Comments: some illogical stunts in the climax and over acting of Micheal in the first half. Average direction to some extent in first half.

Final statement: teenmaar is a generational love story that will appeal the youth and current audience. The old may not be satisfied with the content and children are too innocent to understand this concept.

Verdict: not guilty

title: gaganam

opening statement: definite innovative paced taut thriller that would keep the viewers edge of seats.

the case: hijack drama

the fate: predictable movie since many of such movies have been seen.

the charge: operation gaganam

evidence: there are definite proofs to show that this movie is different. the various evidences include the near 100% screenplay with perfect narration. secondly the direction of the movie. right from the title flying with, in the sky showing the map of India, with the introduction to various characters is perfect and the viewers are caught well with it, thirdly is the cinematography and the camera work done inside a hijacked plane. good movement of the camera along with subtitles at required stages gives a grip. fourthly is the change in screenplay from serious mood to a soothing humorous mood. some interjections of comedy for about 5 minutes would relieve the viewers from a serious mood. and finally the fifth and last is the cast performances. their performance is picture perfect and every character in the movie has got an important role.

facts regarding the charge: we see that the main hero nagarjuna as NSG commando utters the word. from then onwards the movie goes at a rapid pace. the climax almost builds well. the statement is really good and thus the viewers stick to the seats till the credits fall.

closing statement: a definite innovative thriller. the predictable script becomes unpredictable at the rapid pace the movie moves. the viewers are left stunned at the end as the movie concludes. this one is a sure shot movie that has hit the bulls eye

verdict: very good