sinjin321

Zero Stars, but that isn't an option. So bad, so bad.

This is the worst movie I have seen in years. Nothing is redeeming about it other than their ability to get this made and on a streamer. This movie's horror is that actual money was spent on making it.

The premise seemed well-intentioned, but the execution(what should be done to this movie) was deadly.

There are plenty of widely known horrible movies out there. Fortunately, this movie is so bad that it won't even make it onto the list of all-time bad movies because it won't get the satisfaction of being seen enough to make this dubious list. At least being on the "All-Time Worst Movies" will get you views and sales, but this piece of garbage won't even make that cut.

Zero stars if that was an option.

I guess the vigilante is supposed to be the "Messenger of Wrath?" He and his sidekick kind of just appear and could have been left out of the script completely and made this movie three stars instead of two. They seem to serve no purpose other than to kill the bad guys who are looking for other guys. The whole story is like three bad movies in one. There are a lot of questions and stuff in the movie that make no sense. Where is the money? Was the money behind the safe? I guess that was the money left on the nurse's windshield. Then there is the $9k that belongs to the owner of the home they randomly invade as a hideout. If you're going to make a bad movie, at least tie up some of the loose ends. The whole thing seems senseless. They could have done this low-budget flick on a lower budget by cutting out like six or seven parts. Seems like the writer/Director Callaway was just writing parts for friends or friends of the other actors to be in a movie. There was a lot of redundancy when it came to the characters. I expect to see cliched stereotypes in low-budget movies like this, but not three or four of the same character in one movie. Come on! 🤔🙄

So bad, so bad. The premise of the story had promise but it was just so frustrating. Two 40-year-old adults who waffle back and forth constantly. It was embarrassing to portray adults, even in a supposed love story like this in such a fickle manner. Hey, let's ak the two teenage kids what we should do? I don't know which character was more frustrating, the man or the woman. It's an hour 40 minutes I won't get back. The actors seemed to be mostly unknowns that were given bad dialougue and plot devices to work with that isn't going to do any wonders for their careers going forward. It was very predictable, but that was a given. However, how they got to the pridictability of the plot could have been done with some credibility instead of making the adults look so foolish. The teenagers in the film were more dependable and sensible than the adults, but I don't think that was intentional. Just nonsense. I wanted to like this movie so much becsause the core of the story is good, just bad execution.