RoboDan
Joined Dec 2006
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Ratings2.4K
RoboDan's rating
Reviews3
RoboDan's rating
I saw "Jack" aka "Smiling Jack" tonight at the Manulife center cinema in Toronto as an invitation from Pier21 films. As fate would have it I arrived late and ended up sitting right across the aisle from Jack Layton's wife (Olivia Chow), his son (Mike Layton), his daughter, and directly behind Mrs. Chow's mother - a fact I did not realize until the end of the presentation, despite Olivia Chow's bright yellow skirt and suit jacket.
To begin let me say that setting aside partisan politics is far from simple. Even though this film does actively attempt to separate the two it does not completely succeed. That could, however, be the result of the indelible link in my own mind between Jack Layton "the man" and Jack Layton "the Leader of the NDP" - likely because he had become such an iconic figurehead of the NDP. I will leave my own beliefs out of this review and comment only on the quality of the storytelling and the picture.
The film begins clearly enough with a retelling of the events of the 2011 Election from the perspective of a fly-on-the-wall in the Jack Layton camp. Throughout the story events from Jack's life are interspersed to give the audience an idea of the experience that made him who he was, although such events were perhaps too sparse. Although I had some knowledge of him beforehand I don't feel like the film made enough effort to make the audience understand Jack's character - and the man that everyone respected, even if they didn't like him. Perhaps it is done as to not come off too preachy or pro-left, but that is only this reviewer's conjecture. The film is distinctly Canadian both in its triumphs and failings, with choppy performances by some of the supporting actors early on, which eventually faded as the film began to flow. The core actors were believable, natural (human), and even quite likable. Overall, the set design, stock footage, and choice of filming locations was fairly seamless, however living in Toronto and Edmonton, and having traveled extensively across Canada over the past 2 decades, I did feel that part of it was contrived (which makes sense since many scenes that were set in Ottawa and Montreal were filmed in Winnipeg).
In the end I was left with the vague understanding of Jack as a remarkably genuine, kind, and real person (with all of our frailties and aspirations) who was born into politics and ran with it. It isn't necessarily the story of a partisan leader or of politics. This film may appear to some to become more left-leaning toward the end, but you cannot separate the man's triumphs from the people and party who got him there. My advice is to watch this film with as little hatred or love as possible and simply enjoy the story of a great Canadian - may we be so lucky as to have more like him, especially in politics. What you think of the man is your choice, but neither you nor his opponents could deny his grace, candor, and humanity.
I'd like to thank Pier21 films for the invitation to view the first public screening of this film. I applaud you on your work.
To begin let me say that setting aside partisan politics is far from simple. Even though this film does actively attempt to separate the two it does not completely succeed. That could, however, be the result of the indelible link in my own mind between Jack Layton "the man" and Jack Layton "the Leader of the NDP" - likely because he had become such an iconic figurehead of the NDP. I will leave my own beliefs out of this review and comment only on the quality of the storytelling and the picture.
The film begins clearly enough with a retelling of the events of the 2011 Election from the perspective of a fly-on-the-wall in the Jack Layton camp. Throughout the story events from Jack's life are interspersed to give the audience an idea of the experience that made him who he was, although such events were perhaps too sparse. Although I had some knowledge of him beforehand I don't feel like the film made enough effort to make the audience understand Jack's character - and the man that everyone respected, even if they didn't like him. Perhaps it is done as to not come off too preachy or pro-left, but that is only this reviewer's conjecture. The film is distinctly Canadian both in its triumphs and failings, with choppy performances by some of the supporting actors early on, which eventually faded as the film began to flow. The core actors were believable, natural (human), and even quite likable. Overall, the set design, stock footage, and choice of filming locations was fairly seamless, however living in Toronto and Edmonton, and having traveled extensively across Canada over the past 2 decades, I did feel that part of it was contrived (which makes sense since many scenes that were set in Ottawa and Montreal were filmed in Winnipeg).
In the end I was left with the vague understanding of Jack as a remarkably genuine, kind, and real person (with all of our frailties and aspirations) who was born into politics and ran with it. It isn't necessarily the story of a partisan leader or of politics. This film may appear to some to become more left-leaning toward the end, but you cannot separate the man's triumphs from the people and party who got him there. My advice is to watch this film with as little hatred or love as possible and simply enjoy the story of a great Canadian - may we be so lucky as to have more like him, especially in politics. What you think of the man is your choice, but neither you nor his opponents could deny his grace, candor, and humanity.
I'd like to thank Pier21 films for the invitation to view the first public screening of this film. I applaud you on your work.
Now far be if from me to judge how the owners of a franchise - beloved or not - handle their product, however I am entitled to right to my own opinion. If you disagree, fine. I respect your right to.
We open with the can of worms that is product placement. While it was always somewhat present in the Bond films, it has never been so blatant or counter-Bond as it has become, especially in Skyfall. James Bond drinking beer? Driving a Mercedes? Using a freaking Sony Vaio and Xperia S (some of the worst junk in tech today bears the name Sony). I have never cringed so hard while watching a beloved movie character whose mystique was built over 50 years be sold off to the highest bidder. No self respecting government agency would use Sony Vaio laptops (did anyone else notice the wobbly-to-hell screen when Bond tapped it with "that's the guy"). No secret agent would likely have a smartphone or iPhone without an OS that has the proper encryption. Bond would not shill for Heineken - a beer that is sold to the US by Holland which Dutch people will not drink because it is really that awful in comparison to European beer.
Bond once represented that which is refined - Vodka Martinis, Fine automobiles, a knowledge of Champagnes and Wines, Art and History, and even Science and technology. Now he really has been transformed into a skilled thug with a club.
While I like Daniel Craig in the role of secret agent, he never has been "Bond" and may never be. If things continue as they have, we might see him drive a Lexus, eat at Dominos Pizza or a street hot dog cart, and shotgun Jager with... well the women are still beautiful. At least that hasn't changed.
To borrow from the a prominent cliché in the film: It's a brave new world. It's Bond to the highest bidder.
We open with the can of worms that is product placement. While it was always somewhat present in the Bond films, it has never been so blatant or counter-Bond as it has become, especially in Skyfall. James Bond drinking beer? Driving a Mercedes? Using a freaking Sony Vaio and Xperia S (some of the worst junk in tech today bears the name Sony). I have never cringed so hard while watching a beloved movie character whose mystique was built over 50 years be sold off to the highest bidder. No self respecting government agency would use Sony Vaio laptops (did anyone else notice the wobbly-to-hell screen when Bond tapped it with "that's the guy"). No secret agent would likely have a smartphone or iPhone without an OS that has the proper encryption. Bond would not shill for Heineken - a beer that is sold to the US by Holland which Dutch people will not drink because it is really that awful in comparison to European beer.
Bond once represented that which is refined - Vodka Martinis, Fine automobiles, a knowledge of Champagnes and Wines, Art and History, and even Science and technology. Now he really has been transformed into a skilled thug with a club.
While I like Daniel Craig in the role of secret agent, he never has been "Bond" and may never be. If things continue as they have, we might see him drive a Lexus, eat at Dominos Pizza or a street hot dog cart, and shotgun Jager with... well the women are still beautiful. At least that hasn't changed.
To borrow from the a prominent cliché in the film: It's a brave new world. It's Bond to the highest bidder.