NullUnit
Joined Jul 2021
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Ratings3.1K
NullUnit's rating
Reviews274
NullUnit's rating
A series about an Amazon Prime employee would probably be more interesting.....
A "thriller" based on math... what a horrific idea.
Acting is pretty horrid.
Pacing is slower than glacial.
Storyline is just flat out stupid.
Shades of Good Will Hunting.. only far less interesting.
"Some of the greatest minds in math today" who don't know prime numbers off the top of their head??? Yeah.. sure...
Random spy cameras ANYWHERE and EVERYWHERE. And positioned at ANY angle necessary.
The first two episodes are quite possibly the absolute dumbest start to any Apple series I've seen to date. I thought Before was bad.. this is worse....
It doesn't make ANY sense whatsoever, not as a "maths series" nor a "thriller". It's just forced drama over apparently REALLY stupid storylines.
Watched 2.. and I'm out.....
------ PASS --------
A "thriller" based on math... what a horrific idea.
Acting is pretty horrid.
Pacing is slower than glacial.
Storyline is just flat out stupid.
Shades of Good Will Hunting.. only far less interesting.
"Some of the greatest minds in math today" who don't know prime numbers off the top of their head??? Yeah.. sure...
Random spy cameras ANYWHERE and EVERYWHERE. And positioned at ANY angle necessary.
The first two episodes are quite possibly the absolute dumbest start to any Apple series I've seen to date. I thought Before was bad.. this is worse....
It doesn't make ANY sense whatsoever, not as a "maths series" nor a "thriller". It's just forced drama over apparently REALLY stupid storylines.
Watched 2.. and I'm out.....
------ PASS --------
At the core, there's a "revenge story". That idea seems solid... the IDEA of it. Although, the storyline is similar to other western revenge stories.. while not the same.. think of the concept used for "The Quick and the Dead" - revenge years later.... that's the crux of the story.
Unfortunately, how the story is written is a convoluted mess. Jumping between time periods using characters that all look similar and don't stand out as unique, Even the protagonist in this film gets lost among other characters.
Any film that needs to put bright yellow text on the screen to show the character names is not written well. Character development within the scenes SHOULD do an adequate job of telling the viewer which character is which. So, when you see the names splashed across the screen in yellow type, you know that the director wants you to know which character is which because the writer did a poor job... but in this.. one of the directors IS the writer.. so.. yeah....
This film has all the trappings of a decent pseudo "spaghetti western" but it never comes together. It doesn't ever "gel". It's confusing, and takes some effort to even discern the storyline due to time jumping back and forth.
Unfortunately, I feel compelled to add.. I LOVE Jim Gaffigan as a COMEDIAN.. but he didn't do a great job in this playing a purely dramatic role and a narrative (while poorly attempting an accent). Gaffigan probably did the worst acting job out of all the cast.
There's no sex or nudity. There is some reference to more adult situations (bad western outlaws and women), however, nothing overly visual or notable. Far more of a connotation than any direct content.
There is western violence (shootouts with blood).
I can't recall any profanity whatsoever.
Meh.... it's not "horrible", but it's not exactly a "should see" either.
Unfortunately, how the story is written is a convoluted mess. Jumping between time periods using characters that all look similar and don't stand out as unique, Even the protagonist in this film gets lost among other characters.
Any film that needs to put bright yellow text on the screen to show the character names is not written well. Character development within the scenes SHOULD do an adequate job of telling the viewer which character is which. So, when you see the names splashed across the screen in yellow type, you know that the director wants you to know which character is which because the writer did a poor job... but in this.. one of the directors IS the writer.. so.. yeah....
This film has all the trappings of a decent pseudo "spaghetti western" but it never comes together. It doesn't ever "gel". It's confusing, and takes some effort to even discern the storyline due to time jumping back and forth.
Unfortunately, I feel compelled to add.. I LOVE Jim Gaffigan as a COMEDIAN.. but he didn't do a great job in this playing a purely dramatic role and a narrative (while poorly attempting an accent). Gaffigan probably did the worst acting job out of all the cast.
There's no sex or nudity. There is some reference to more adult situations (bad western outlaws and women), however, nothing overly visual or notable. Far more of a connotation than any direct content.
There is western violence (shootouts with blood).
I can't recall any profanity whatsoever.
Meh.... it's not "horrible", but it's not exactly a "should see" either.
6 episodes and the ONLY funny bit was when "Pray for Our Souls." was said.. in an accent. That's all the humor.. 15 seconds in 6 episodes.
It's not a comedy.. it was a half-decent "teen" thriller for the most part. At least the first 4 episodes... then they switched on the whole DEI thing.. and it went downhill. Just seems to really muddy up the story by suddenly throwing in DEI-related content. It wasn't necessary or needed. Not against it, but to wait 4 episodes then throw in a superfluous sub-plot at that point is just poor planning or writing.
Eventually this series even cited the horror film it was .. well .... just mimicking really. If you saw that film, you'll be wondering if that's what it's copying.. it is. This series is not terribly original.
None of the characters are really that likable or engaging.
It's exceptional in one way... just how mediocre it is.
------- Pass --------------
It's not a comedy.. it was a half-decent "teen" thriller for the most part. At least the first 4 episodes... then they switched on the whole DEI thing.. and it went downhill. Just seems to really muddy up the story by suddenly throwing in DEI-related content. It wasn't necessary or needed. Not against it, but to wait 4 episodes then throw in a superfluous sub-plot at that point is just poor planning or writing.
Eventually this series even cited the horror film it was .. well .... just mimicking really. If you saw that film, you'll be wondering if that's what it's copying.. it is. This series is not terribly original.
None of the characters are really that likable or engaging.
It's exceptional in one way... just how mediocre it is.
------- Pass --------------