anh-93010

You can see that the movie has a high score, don't get trapped, don't be affected by the score.

What I don't like about the movie:

• The camera crew turned on vomiting mode

• Car chase or run + guns + a little fighting (should have been more because it was the best part of the movie) + boring conversations (narrative purpose for the ending) = Bourne.

• The movie is too dry and not like the first movie, it is a version of the second movie but worse

• Does not bring about emotional feelings of sadness or excitement.

• The movie is not for the elderly because it is too shaky, not for young people because it lacks emotions, not for middle-aged people because it lacks depth (Although the script has depth, the director cannot express it). Especially not for spies and police, you understand why.

• Noisy and redundant, I planned to watch all five series to catch the newest one but I have to drop it now.

They made a movie about an American and represented American pride but the filmmakers didn't understand anything about war, the characters weren't realistic. The most pointless, thoughtless movie I've ever seen.

I understand this is a brainless movie and made for entertainment but come on, it's stupid. The dialogue is bland and uninteresting, the story lacks depth and more.

The action scenes are like other 80s movies, not bad and there is a decent helicopter fight scene. But beyond that it has no value at all, flashy on the outside but meaningless on the inside.

Is this character iconic? For what, for annoying stupidity and nationalistic self-aggrandizement. Except for the first part, which shows the pain and obsession of soldiers after the war, the following parts take the character too far, a potential character but are exploited in the wrong way.

How to make a rambo movie: rambo + fabricated history and characters + national pride = action masterpiece.