foxymophandle
Joined Jun 2019
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Reviews5
foxymophandle's rating
I watched this in November 2023 in the aftermath of the 7/10 atrocities to try and get a wider understanding of the problems in a region that has been thrust into the spotlight.
I'll preface by saying I'm neither Jewish nor Israeli and my knowledge of the Israel/Palestine conflict is hardly extensive, but the good reviews of this documentary gave me hope that it would provide some good insight.
Within the first few minutes, words like 'apartheid' and 'colonialism' are banded around, which doesn't exactly set the scene for a balanced portrayal of the topic, but nevertheless the film does go on to attempt it.
As other reviewers have noted, this is wonderfully shot and generally well-made in terms of production values, but this is probably the best thing about it.
At nearly 2hrs long it still struggles not to rush over important events, and it begins abruptly with the assumption that the viewer is aware of the complex history of the region prior to 1948. This makes it rather fast-paced, with a lot of information to take in at once.
There are some wonderful and interesting characters interviewed on both sides but sadly their stories are not developed and we're not really able to connect or fully understand their daily lives in the West Bank, which seems a real shame.
In terms of narrative, the story is mainly rolled along by seemingly 'left-wing' talking head academics with some segues from the narrator, with the Settler side portrayed largely by themselves. The problem with this is that it clearly sets up a kind of 'official narrative' vs 'crackpot narrative' type scenario which starts to detract from the documentary's credibility of balance. Also, while highlighting a few major events, it generally skims over the Palestinian hatred and violence towards the settlements and Israelis, which is obviously a key element to why the region is so troubled.
In conclusion, this French/Isreali production certainly gives a good general timeline of the story of settlements in the West Bank, but felt rushed even at its 2hr length, and seemingly designed more to get awards at European film festivals than give an honestly balanced view of an exceedingly complicated situation.
Though it did try.
I'll preface by saying I'm neither Jewish nor Israeli and my knowledge of the Israel/Palestine conflict is hardly extensive, but the good reviews of this documentary gave me hope that it would provide some good insight.
Within the first few minutes, words like 'apartheid' and 'colonialism' are banded around, which doesn't exactly set the scene for a balanced portrayal of the topic, but nevertheless the film does go on to attempt it.
As other reviewers have noted, this is wonderfully shot and generally well-made in terms of production values, but this is probably the best thing about it.
At nearly 2hrs long it still struggles not to rush over important events, and it begins abruptly with the assumption that the viewer is aware of the complex history of the region prior to 1948. This makes it rather fast-paced, with a lot of information to take in at once.
There are some wonderful and interesting characters interviewed on both sides but sadly their stories are not developed and we're not really able to connect or fully understand their daily lives in the West Bank, which seems a real shame.
In terms of narrative, the story is mainly rolled along by seemingly 'left-wing' talking head academics with some segues from the narrator, with the Settler side portrayed largely by themselves. The problem with this is that it clearly sets up a kind of 'official narrative' vs 'crackpot narrative' type scenario which starts to detract from the documentary's credibility of balance. Also, while highlighting a few major events, it generally skims over the Palestinian hatred and violence towards the settlements and Israelis, which is obviously a key element to why the region is so troubled.
In conclusion, this French/Isreali production certainly gives a good general timeline of the story of settlements in the West Bank, but felt rushed even at its 2hr length, and seemingly designed more to get awards at European film festivals than give an honestly balanced view of an exceedingly complicated situation.
Though it did try.
..that was bad. Had high hopes, and the beginning was pretty intriguing. But as others have noted, by the third act it has completely disintegrated. And the ending is just hilarious!
If you like dark, moody sci-fi, you're probably thinking this might keep you occupied for a few hours, and hey what do you have to lose? Well, I was like you my friend, and I lost 2 hours of my life.
I don't think I've ever given a movie less than 4 stars before, as I can usually judge if it's a stinker in advance. But sad to say, not this time.
As other reviewers have also noted, this was a huge missed opportunity - and I think what makes it worse is that it actually fools you for about the first half that it might be a good movie. Unfortunately a triple shot of cliché, predictability and genericism are injected straight into its vertebrae, from which it is impossible to recover.
Wish I can time travel back to 2 hours ago and watch something else!
If you like dark, moody sci-fi, you're probably thinking this might keep you occupied for a few hours, and hey what do you have to lose? Well, I was like you my friend, and I lost 2 hours of my life.
I don't think I've ever given a movie less than 4 stars before, as I can usually judge if it's a stinker in advance. But sad to say, not this time.
As other reviewers have also noted, this was a huge missed opportunity - and I think what makes it worse is that it actually fools you for about the first half that it might be a good movie. Unfortunately a triple shot of cliché, predictability and genericism are injected straight into its vertebrae, from which it is impossible to recover.
Wish I can time travel back to 2 hours ago and watch something else!
I understand the negative reviews, as this movie is bleak and at times visually disturbing, however it certainly stays with you for a long time after viewing - which is more than can be said for a lot of modern movies.
It's a Kafka-esque mindtwister, and there are no unicorns and rainbows. It quite literally portrays what would happen to a few humans, some related, some complete strangers, mentally and physically if they were trapped in a spacial, but not temporal, loop.
If you want neat and happy endings, on-message moralising, famous comforting faces, this is not for you. It's not high-budget, and it's not going to win any Oscars, but it's an interesting idea, portrayed with terrifying realism. It's claustrophobic, limited settings are more akin to a screenplay, though the Mexican hills certainly make for a hauntingly beautiful backdrop to the road story.
If you like Borges, PKD, glitch_in_the_matrix, etc., certainly check it out, you won't be un-entertained. But be warned, it's... pretty weird.
It's a Kafka-esque mindtwister, and there are no unicorns and rainbows. It quite literally portrays what would happen to a few humans, some related, some complete strangers, mentally and physically if they were trapped in a spacial, but not temporal, loop.
If you want neat and happy endings, on-message moralising, famous comforting faces, this is not for you. It's not high-budget, and it's not going to win any Oscars, but it's an interesting idea, portrayed with terrifying realism. It's claustrophobic, limited settings are more akin to a screenplay, though the Mexican hills certainly make for a hauntingly beautiful backdrop to the road story.
If you like Borges, PKD, glitch_in_the_matrix, etc., certainly check it out, you won't be un-entertained. But be warned, it's... pretty weird.