aaronclawrence
Joined Jul 2002
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Reviews30
aaronclawrence's rating
We watched 4 episodes, and then gave up. The beginning seemed intriguing, although admittedly the 'science' parts were pretty bad, I could suspend disbelief. But then it just wandered: the plot, tone and characters seem to have no coherent plan.
It mostly.seemed like episodes of the Twilighr zone, or maybe just a writers workshop where they do exercises in varied motivations and ideas.
The thing that did my head in was really the characters. They change on a whim, and not even for dramatic purposes. One second they kill someone; next they are apologetic and sad, then they've forgotten this life changing trauma. Maybe the writers are trying to portray something - maybe everyone is supposed to be a pyschopath?? It's pretty weird.
In the end the lack of any ongoing plot or theme makes it not worth watching. How frustrating.
It mostly.seemed like episodes of the Twilighr zone, or maybe just a writers workshop where they do exercises in varied motivations and ideas.
The thing that did my head in was really the characters. They change on a whim, and not even for dramatic purposes. One second they kill someone; next they are apologetic and sad, then they've forgotten this life changing trauma. Maybe the writers are trying to portray something - maybe everyone is supposed to be a pyschopath?? It's pretty weird.
In the end the lack of any ongoing plot or theme makes it not worth watching. How frustrating.
As usual, an expensive cast can't help with a poor script of less than B-grade quality. Kevin Hart is mis-cast and has zero charisma as the supposed leader of an elite team of art thieves. A few other names show up but have little to do.
Action is kind of feeble, except for the initial Venice boat chase which is just OK. The actual plot, such as it is, makes very little sense, and seems essentially random.
Even my wife, who is very tolerant for basic fun movies, was openly mocking the ridiculous and predictable script by the end.
Yes, it's another half-hearted by the numbers effort by Netflix. No, it's really not worth your time. I regretted watching it.
Action is kind of feeble, except for the initial Venice boat chase which is just OK. The actual plot, such as it is, makes very little sense, and seems essentially random.
Even my wife, who is very tolerant for basic fun movies, was openly mocking the ridiculous and predictable script by the end.
Yes, it's another half-hearted by the numbers effort by Netflix. No, it's really not worth your time. I regretted watching it.
Although it has some good elements and makes a reasonable effort at character building, this film seems to struggle in tone. Is it a thriller? Well, there are perhaps 20 minutes that might count as thrilling. Is it an action movie? There's some action, but long sections of the movie have none. Is it a study in how terrorists are created? Maybe a little, but the motivations seem flimsy and more time is spent on a clumsy romance. Is it a gritty English drama? Kind of, but a lot of it is quite subdued and not dramatic at all. It also has some rather absurd plot moments (getting explosives through an elaborate attack on an arms dealer? Um, I don't think arms dealers carry around plastic explosives in a briefcase), and a ridiculous conspiracy that comes out of nowhere.
With some rewrites and a lot of editing this could be a pretty good film, but instead it's a somewhat boring mess.
With some rewrites and a lot of editing this could be a pretty good film, but instead it's a somewhat boring mess.